Opinion of the Oxford Comma (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 08, 2024, 01:25:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Off-topic Board (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, The Mikado, YE)
  Opinion of the Oxford Comma (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: -skip-
#1
Freedom Practice
 
#2
Horrible Practice
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 43

Author Topic: Opinion of the Oxford Comma  (Read 1945 times)
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,899
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

« on: July 18, 2016, 11:41:04 AM »
« edited: July 18, 2016, 11:50:24 AM by Del Tachi »

I approve! It's useful, makes sense, and I use it often.

That's not an Oxford comma.  ", and" is a coordinating conjunction in this example.


Personally, I believe that the serial comma should only be used in cases where it reduces ambiguity.  There's absolutely no reason to use it in the following sentence, for example:

"The colors of the flag are red, white and blue."

However, as you can see here, sometimes its lack of use does create ambiguity:

"Lydia edits the social, garden and home and cooking sections."

Obviously the above construction is terrible, and an serial comma should be used.  However, the sentence could easily be rearranged to make use of the serial comma unnecessary:

"Lydia edits the home and cooking, social and garden sections."
 
So voted HP.
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,899
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

« Reply #1 on: July 18, 2016, 12:37:32 PM »

So, the positives of using it are reducing possible confusion and ambiguity, while the negatives are... Huh

It's extraneous.  In situations where it matters (like on old school typewriters or Twitter), it counts as a character space. 

Also, can you provide an example where the lack of a serial comma introduces ambiguity that cannot be resolved by simply re-ordering the named items in the series?
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,899
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

« Reply #2 on: July 18, 2016, 03:14:27 PM »

How about using it only when doing so results in the minimal ambiguity? No need to use it or reject it all the time.

This is obviously the best answer, but the point of grammar is to create a standardized set of rules that are universally applicable and understood.  Having a "sometimes do, sometimes don't" type philosophy runs counter to that. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.