James O'Keefe: "We have smoking gun evidence and it is incredibly damning."
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 16, 2024, 01:39:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  James O'Keefe: "We have smoking gun evidence and it is incredibly damning."
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7
Author Topic: James O'Keefe: "We have smoking gun evidence and it is incredibly damning."  (Read 9041 times)
PresidentTRUMP
2016election
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 945


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #125 on: October 24, 2016, 12:50:14 PM »

Man oh man, after reading these responses.....its becoming VERY obvious for the first time to me this is BreEXIT all over again just here in the united states. Yes the ABC poll showing Hillary up 12 points?! 12 points in a general election and people actually believe that?! This is actually comical.

Lol, you have no understating of what the Brexit polling looked liked. And yes we believe Hillary up 12 because there have been many other good polls with her in that range.

No, i think the Russians altered the video and gave it to O'Keefe.
Logged
BundouYMB
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 910


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #126 on: October 24, 2016, 12:50:25 PM »

Man oh man, after reading these responses.....its becoming VERY obvious for the first time to me this is BreEXIT all over again just here in the united states. Yes the ABC poll showing Hillary up 12 points?! 12 points in a general election and people actually believe that?! This is actually comical.

Lol, you have no understating of what the Brexit polling looked liked. And yes we believe Hillary up 12 because there have been many other good polls with her in that range.

If you actually believe shes up 12 points, no reason for a discussion. She may win easily but to suggest the popular vote is a 12 point range is literally hilarious.

You're so right! Every reliable poll has shown Clinton up 10~ but your fee fees say otherwise so of course she's not!
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,540
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #127 on: October 24, 2016, 12:52:02 PM »

The average as if yesterday for live caller polls was Clinton +8.3, so yes a couple of polls with the lead at 12 make sense.
Logged
Cashew
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,573
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #128 on: October 24, 2016, 12:57:18 PM »


Hillary Clinton loves Donald Duck confirmed. Guess she should drop out.
Logged
Ⓐnarchy in the ☭☭☭P!
ModernBourbon Democrat
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,324


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #129 on: October 24, 2016, 01:01:07 PM »

I love the circular logic Clinton supporters use to justify whether something matters or not. As if the media outlets that have been shown to be actively running stories past her campaign before publishing them are going to cover something that suggests she is complicit in inciting violence at Trump rallies.

Meanwhile, Trump speaking lewdly in private is an automatic disqualification from the presidency and is a BIG DEAL for some reason. Only far-right crazies care about voter fraud and corruption but talking like a frat boy is just too much.

Incidentally, Trump will still lose because Hillary could literally eat a baby on live television and her hack fraud supporters (including the ones on CNN that claim to be unbiased) would say "Hillary Clinton eating a baby is something only far right kooks care about" and carry on with the story about the pie eating contest.
Logged
PresidentTRUMP
2016election
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 945


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #130 on: October 24, 2016, 01:03:38 PM »

I love the circular logic Clinton supporters use to justify whether something matters or not. As if the media outlets that have been shown to be actively running stories past her campaign before publishing them are going to cover something that suggests she is complicit in inciting violence at Trump rallies.

Meanwhile, Trump speaking lewdly in private is an automatic disqualification from the presidency and is a BIG DEAL for some reason. Only far-right crazies care about voter fraud and corruption but talking like a frat boy is just too much.

Incidentally, Trump will still lose because Hillary could literally eat a baby on live television and her hack fraud supporters (including the ones on CNN that claim to be unbiased) would say "Hillary Clinton eating a baby is something only far right kooks care about" and carry on with the story about the pie eating contest.

Sadly, you are probably 100% right on exactly everything you said.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #131 on: October 24, 2016, 01:15:42 PM »


Meanwhile, Trump speaking lewdly in private is an automatic disqualification from the presidency and is a BIG DEAL for some reason. Only far-right crazies care about voter fraud and corruption but talking like a frat boy is just too much.
I don't give a damn about how lewd Trump is. If he used completely polite language as he described how he sexually assaults women, I would react the same way.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #132 on: October 24, 2016, 01:16:16 PM »

There isn't any circular logic: O'Keefe is a convicted criminal that has been successfully sued many times in relation to the videos he cuts and the unethical and libelous edits he makes to them. So, thus, we have no reason to believe the validity of these videos and every reason to believe he is using similar strategies. It is not reasonable people's fault that you cannot understand logic and common sense.
Logged
Confused Democrat
reidmill
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,055
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #133 on: October 24, 2016, 01:33:16 PM »

Meanwhile, Trump speaking lewdly in private is an automatic disqualification from the presidency and is a BIG DEAL for some reason. Only far-right crazies care about voter fraud and corruption but talking like a frat boy is just too much.

Here, let me quote you some of that "frat boy" talk:

- “I did try and f--- her. She was married,”

- “I moved on her like a bitch, but I couldn’t get there. And she was married,”

- "I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait.”

- “Grab them by the p---y...You can do anything.”

These things describe sexual assault not "frat boy" talk. Nobody with a decent head on their shoulders would ever say these things.

Logged
‼realJohnEwards‼
MatteKudasai
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,867
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #134 on: October 24, 2016, 02:31:46 PM »

Releasing edited and misleading videos is O'Keefe's modus oprendi. Why should we trust him this time?

HAHAHAHAHA a PORN STAR comes out with a claim and her statements are taken for fact on here, go read them, amazing. Yet, three videos come out and they were "altered" this is actually comical. Unfortunately, they can't say that about wikileaks as everyone knows they are true and these VIDEOS are evidence of the wikileaks, but they were edited of course! .... it was the RUSSIANS who altered these videos is coming next. This is actually hilarious to read and shows how bias this board is. You want any credibility on this board you admit what went on is wrong and the videos are OBVIOUSLY true but in your opinion it wont make a difference and your still voting for Hillary. That would be fine. But the atlas democratic forum says the videos are "altered". This is getting funnier by the minute.  
Dude, if someone who poisoned your neighbor's dog offers to take care of yours, are you just going to go ahead and say "well, he's a petsitter"?
Logged
Ⓐnarchy in the ☭☭☭P!
ModernBourbon Democrat
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,324


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #135 on: October 24, 2016, 02:46:10 PM »

There isn't any circular logic: O'Keefe is a convicted criminal that has been successfully sued many times in relation to the videos he cuts and the unethical and libelous edits he makes to them. So, thus, we have no reason to believe the validity of these videos and every reason to believe he is using similar strategies. It is not reasonable people's fault that you cannot understand logic and common sense.

Okay, so he makes misleading cuts. Please explain to me how his recent videos could have been cut to make these completely innocent Democratic operatives look guilty.

Meanwhile, Trump speaking lewdly in private is an automatic disqualification from the presidency and is a BIG DEAL for some reason. Only far-right crazies care about voter fraud and corruption but talking like a frat boy is just too much.

Here, let me quote you some of that "frat boy" talk:

- “I did try and f--- her. She was married,”

- “I moved on her like a bitch, but I couldn’t get there. And she was married,”

- "I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait.”

- “Grab them by the p---y...You can do anything.”

These things describe sexual assault not "frat boy" talk. Nobody with a decent head on their shoulders would ever say these things.



I'm not sure whether you're lying outright or whether you live in some sort of alternate universe. I can imagine you walking into a college dorm and telling the freshmen "EXCUSE ME THAT IS SEXUAL ASSAULT HOW COULD YOU USE THAT KIND OF LANGUAGE"

Apparently talking like an immature college student is worse than "We came, we saw, he died!" followed by a sinister cackle at the thought of Gaddafi's corpse being mutilated and dragged through the streets.
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #136 on: October 24, 2016, 02:49:21 PM »

i guess james has shown his best cards last week...#duckgate is hilarious.

Logged
Confused Democrat
reidmill
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,055
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #137 on: October 24, 2016, 02:51:32 PM »

I'm not sure whether you're lying outright or whether you live in some sort of alternate universe. I can imagine you walking into a college dorm and telling the freshmen "EXCUSE ME THAT IS SEXUAL ASSAULT HOW COULD YOU USE THAT KIND OF LANGUAGE"

Apparently talking like an immature college student is worse than "We came, we saw, he died!" followed by a sinister cackle at the thought of Gaddafi's corpse being mutilated and dragged through the streets.

Lol, you've obviously never lived in a college dorm before because only creeps talk like that.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,700
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #138 on: October 24, 2016, 02:52:08 PM »

There isn't any circular logic: O'Keefe is a convicted criminal that has been successfully sued many times in relation to the videos he cuts and the unethical and libelous edits he makes to them. So, thus, we have no reason to believe the validity of these videos and every reason to believe he is using similar strategies. It is not reasonable people's fault that you cannot understand logic and common sense.

Okay, so he makes misleading cuts. Please explain to me how his recent videos could have been cut to make these completely innocent Democratic operatives look guilty.

Meanwhile, Trump speaking lewdly in private is an automatic disqualification from the presidency and is a BIG DEAL for some reason. Only far-right crazies care about voter fraud and corruption but talking like a frat boy is just too much.

Here, let me quote you some of that "frat boy" talk:

- “I did try and f--- her. She was married,”

- “I moved on her like a bitch, but I couldn’t get there. And she was married,”

- "I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait.”

- “Grab them by the p---y...You can do anything.”

These things describe sexual assault not "frat boy" talk. Nobody with a decent head on their shoulders would ever say these things.



I'm not sure whether you're lying outright or whether you live in some sort of alternate universe. I can imagine you walking into a college dorm and telling the freshmen "EXCUSE ME THAT IS SEXUAL ASSAULT HOW COULD YOU USE THAT KIND OF LANGUAGE"

Apparently talking like an immature college student is worse than "We came, we saw, he died!" followed by a sinister cackle at the thought of Gaddafi's corpse being mutilated and dragged through the streets.

There's a difference, he didn't say he WANTED to do it, he said he DID IT. I know that's hard to understand but it would be if I said "hey dude, I want to f*** your girlfriend vs "hey dude, I just f***ed your girlfriend".
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,133
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #139 on: October 24, 2016, 02:53:45 PM »

There isn't any circular logic: O'Keefe is a convicted criminal that has been successfully sued many times in relation to the videos he cuts and the unethical and libelous edits he makes to them. So, thus, we have no reason to believe the validity of these videos and every reason to believe he is using similar strategies. It is not reasonable people's fault that you cannot understand logic and common sense.

Okay, so he makes misleading cuts. Please explain to me how his recent videos could have been cut to make these completely innocent Democratic operatives look guilty.

Meanwhile, Trump speaking lewdly in private is an automatic disqualification from the presidency and is a BIG DEAL for some reason. Only far-right crazies care about voter fraud and corruption but talking like a frat boy is just too much.

Here, let me quote you some of that "frat boy" talk:

- “I did try and f--- her. She was married,”

- “I moved on her like a bitch, but I couldn’t get there. And she was married,”

- "I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait.”

- “Grab them by the p---y...You can do anything.”

These things describe sexual assault not "frat boy" talk. Nobody with a decent head on their shoulders would ever say these things.



I'm not sure whether you're lying outright or whether you live in some sort of alternate universe. I can imagine you walking into a college dorm and telling the freshmen "EXCUSE ME THAT IS SEXUAL ASSAULT HOW COULD YOU USE THAT KIND OF LANGUAGE"

Apparently talking like an immature college student is worse than "We came, we saw, he died!" followed by a sinister cackle at the thought of Gaddafi's corpse being mutilated and dragged through the streets.
Dude, I'm an immature college student and not once have I heard that. Sure, we talk about sex a lot, but not in such a creepy, rapey way.

Unless you're one of THOSE people.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,667
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #140 on: October 24, 2016, 02:58:06 PM »

There isn't any circular logic: O'Keefe is a convicted criminal that has been successfully sued many times in relation to the videos he cuts and the unethical and libelous edits he makes to them. So, thus, we have no reason to believe the validity of these videos and every reason to believe he is using similar strategies. It is not reasonable people's fault that you cannot understand logic and common sense.

Okay, so he makes misleading cuts. Please explain to me how his recent videos could have been cut to make these completely innocent Democratic operatives look guilty.

Meanwhile, Trump speaking lewdly in private is an automatic disqualification from the presidency and is a BIG DEAL for some reason. Only far-right crazies care about voter fraud and corruption but talking like a frat boy is just too much.

Here, let me quote you some of that "frat boy" talk:

- “I did try and f--- her. She was married,”

- “I moved on her like a bitch, but I couldn’t get there. And she was married,”

- "I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait.”

- “Grab them by the p---y...You can do anything.”

These things describe sexual assault not "frat boy" talk. Nobody with a decent head on their shoulders would ever say these things.



I'm not sure whether you're lying outright or whether you live in some sort of alternate universe. I can imagine you walking into a college dorm and telling the freshmen "EXCUSE ME THAT IS SEXUAL ASSAULT HOW COULD YOU USE THAT KIND OF LANGUAGE"

Apparently talking like an immature college student is worse than "We came, we saw, he died!" followed by a sinister cackle at the thought of Gaddafi's corpse being mutilated and dragged through the streets.
Dude, I'm an immature college student and not once have I heard that. Sure, we talk about sex a lot, but not in such a creepy, rapey way.

Unless you're one of THOSE people.

Yeah.... pretty much. No one just talks about just having had their way with someone. I talk with friends and even my brothers about this. Sometimes we will be like, "See that girl that gave us ride to the gym/on facebook, I ed her once" or "dude, I wish I could totally screw her". The worst it ever gets is "Gee! Everyone is just grinding on everyone on the dance floor in here!" but no one ever talks about just going up to a random girl in public and grabbing her by her titties or something.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #141 on: October 24, 2016, 02:58:11 PM »

Trump wasn't in college, he was fifty nine years old.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,233
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #142 on: October 24, 2016, 03:09:51 PM »

There isn't any circular logic: O'Keefe is a convicted criminal that has been successfully sued many times in relation to the videos he cuts and the unethical and libelous edits he makes to them. So, thus, we have no reason to believe the validity of these videos and every reason to believe he is using similar strategies. It is not reasonable people's fault that you cannot understand logic and common sense.

Okay, so he makes misleading cuts. Please explain to me how his recent videos could have been cut to make these completely innocent Democratic operatives look guilty.

Meanwhile, Trump speaking lewdly in private is an automatic disqualification from the presidency and is a BIG DEAL for some reason. Only far-right crazies care about voter fraud and corruption but talking like a frat boy is just too much.

Here, let me quote you some of that "frat boy" talk:

- “I did try and f--- her. She was married,”

- “I moved on her like a bitch, but I couldn’t get there. And she was married,”

- "I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait.”

- “Grab them by the p---y...You can do anything.”

These things describe sexual assault not "frat boy" talk. Nobody with a decent head on their shoulders would ever say these things.



I'm not sure whether you're lying outright or whether you live in some sort of alternate universe. I can imagine you walking into a college dorm and telling the freshmen "EXCUSE ME THAT IS SEXUAL ASSAULT HOW COULD YOU USE THAT KIND OF LANGUAGE"

Apparently talking like an immature college student is worse than "We came, we saw, he died!" followed by a sinister cackle at the thought of Gaddafi's corpse being mutilated and dragged through the streets.

Uh, yeah, seeing as how Gaddafi was a murderous dictator and not an innocent sexual assault victim. F[inks] that POS.
Logged
Ⓐnarchy in the ☭☭☭P!
ModernBourbon Democrat
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,324


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #143 on: October 24, 2016, 05:32:14 PM »

There isn't any circular logic: O'Keefe is a convicted criminal that has been successfully sued many times in relation to the videos he cuts and the unethical and libelous edits he makes to them. So, thus, we have no reason to believe the validity of these videos and every reason to believe he is using similar strategies. It is not reasonable people's fault that you cannot understand logic and common sense.

Okay, so he makes misleading cuts. Please explain to me how his recent videos could have been cut to make these completely innocent Democratic operatives look guilty.

Meanwhile, Trump speaking lewdly in private is an automatic disqualification from the presidency and is a BIG DEAL for some reason. Only far-right crazies care about voter fraud and corruption but talking like a frat boy is just too much.

Here, let me quote you some of that "frat boy" talk:

- “I did try and f--- her. She was married,”

- “I moved on her like a bitch, but I couldn’t get there. And she was married,”

- "I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait.”

- “Grab them by the p---y...You can do anything.”

These things describe sexual assault not "frat boy" talk. Nobody with a decent head on their shoulders would ever say these things.



I'm not sure whether you're lying outright or whether you live in some sort of alternate universe. I can imagine you walking into a college dorm and telling the freshmen "EXCUSE ME THAT IS SEXUAL ASSAULT HOW COULD YOU USE THAT KIND OF LANGUAGE"

Apparently talking like an immature college student is worse than "We came, we saw, he died!" followed by a sinister cackle at the thought of Gaddafi's corpse being mutilated and dragged through the streets.

There's a difference, he didn't say he WANTED to do it, he said he DID IT. I know that's hard to understand but it would be if I said "hey dude, I want to f*** your girlfriend vs "hey dude, I just f***ed your girlfriend".

People telling sex stories tend to leave out "unnecessary" details, context, etc. They also tend to embellish if they think they can get away with it, which is more or less what Trump was doing The gist of what he was saying was "I'm so rich/famous/charismatic that I could come onto a married woman and she'd welcome it", not "I'm so rich/famous/charismatic that I could rape a woman and get away with it"


Trump wasn't in college, he was fifty nine years old.

Sure, and what he said was pretty pathetic to come from a grown ass man rather than a college undergrad, but that it is considered to be the big scandal of his campaign is just ridiculous, especially while blowing off anything from Wikileaks or O'Keefe as "a non issue" or "irrelevant".

Hell, even with neither of those in the mix, there are plenty of things Hillary has done that are thousands of times worse than anything Trump has ever done or even been accused of doing. Say what you will of Trump, he hasn't destabilized any foreign countries or advocated for sanctions that led to hundreds of thousands of deaths. In modern America, crude, sophomoric speech is considered to be worse than mass murder.
Logged
calvinhobbesliker
Rookie
**
Posts: 33


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #144 on: October 24, 2016, 09:40:22 PM »

Ah, the stupid argument: "Since Hillary made some bad decisions and Trump never had the power to make bad decisions (in politics), let's elect him even though what he proposes to do is worse."
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #145 on: October 24, 2016, 10:20:27 PM »

There isn't any circular logic: O'Keefe is a convicted criminal that has been successfully sued many times in relation to the videos he cuts and the unethical and libelous edits he makes to them. So, thus, we have no reason to believe the validity of these videos and every reason to believe he is using similar strategies. It is not reasonable people's fault that you cannot understand logic and common sense.

Okay, so he makes misleading cuts. Please explain to me how his recent videos could have been cut to make these completely innocent Democratic operatives look guilty.

Well, when he has been sued in the past and ordered to release the unedited tapes, it has become incredibly evident how he edited them to make them much worse than they actually were. I have every reason to believe that after this cycle is over and he is sued for libel by these people, a similar series of events will occur. If O'Keefe were willing to release the unedited tapes (he isn't), we could put this to bed. Until then, there is no reason for any reasonable person to believe that the edited tapes are accurate in any way.
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #146 on: October 31, 2016, 12:51:33 AM »
« Edited: October 31, 2016, 12:57:00 AM by ApatheticAustrian »

and next week....according to james....

COMES THE NEEDED EVIDENCE THAT THE DEMOCRATS HATE BLACK PEOPLE!!!!!!

https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/792507399097708544
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #147 on: October 31, 2016, 12:53:08 AM »

and next week....accord to james....

COMES THE NEEDED EVIDENCE THAT THE DEMOCRATS HATE BLACK PEOPLE!!!!!!

https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/792507399097708544

I would stop paying attention to the sad hack that is O'Keefe.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,719


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #148 on: November 01, 2016, 04:14:10 PM »

James O'Keefe
‏@JamesOKeefeIII
Tomorrow @PVeritas_Action and @POTUS will be in NC. One of us will be releasing hidden camera footage of a Dem racist statement. Stay tuned.

https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/793558797235134464
Logged
ApatheticAustrian
ApathicAustrian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,603
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #149 on: November 01, 2016, 04:15:26 PM »

black statement in NC.....

and he wonders why he isn't taken seriously?

(ok, paling around with roger stone and alex jones could be another reason)
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.073 seconds with 12 queries.