See, what you call evidence isn't actually evidence, you are committing a fallacy called Post hoc ergo propter hoc, whereby, because x follows y ("angry leftists" followed "rahm emmanuel") the the latter must have caused the former.
In actual fact, you have not provided any evidence that there is some leftist conspiracy to commit organised violence, beyond what exists in your imagination
See what I mean.
There's solid evidence that there was a planned riot at the Trump rally in Chicago and solid evidence that the top organisers of the riot were linked to the DNC. There is also solid evidence that CPD were given orders from their Democrat aligned bosses to stand down and that this allowed the riot to get out of control. In addition the circumstantial evidence strongly suggests that the later fact is linked to the first two facts.
Execpt you gave no such facts. You only post the delusions of those who are consumed with Trumpism and nothing more. You get why most people think you talk out the ass.
