1992 United States Presidential Election (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 09, 2024, 06:24:50 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  1992 United States Presidential Election (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Well that was all ado about nothing. Typical.
#1
Vice President Mario Cuomo (Democrat-New York)/Senator Albert Gore, Jr. (Democrat-Tennessee)		  
#2
Former Congressman Ronald E. "Ron" Paul (Republican-Texas)/Governor John McClaughry (Republican-Vermont)		  
#3
Businessman H. Ross Perot (Independent-Texas)/Former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Colin L. Powell (Independent-Pennsylvania)		  
#4
Dr. Mary Ruwart (Libertarian-Texas)/Mr. Richard B. Boddie (Libertarian-California)		  
#5
Activist Lenora Fulani (New Alliance-New York)/Activist Maria Elizabeth Muñoz (New Alliance-California)		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 87

Author Topic: 1992 United States Presidential Election  (Read 13469 times)
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04
« on: May 10, 2013, 04:47:46 PM »
With joy in my heart.
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04
« Reply #1 on: May 10, 2013, 05:21:11 PM »
Quote from: Californian Tony on May 10, 2013, 04:59:09 PM
Cuomo Paul, enthusiastically.

Fellow progressives freedom fighters, don't miss this chance to have one of our greatest heroes elected!
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04
« Reply #2 on: May 10, 2013, 06:10:14 PM »
Quote from: Californian Tony on May 10, 2013, 06:04:57 PM
Quote from: Ѕenator Αverroës on May 10, 2013, 06:01:29 PM
Cuomo, although I'm highly disappointed in him for picking Gore as his running mate.

Cathcon's last trick to sabotage his candidacy...
Give it a rest already.
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04
« Reply #3 on: May 10, 2013, 10:38:35 PM »
There is this year called 1996, luckily for you, and likely unfortunately for us.
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04
« Reply #4 on: May 10, 2013, 10:57:21 PM »
Quote from: LumineVonReuental on May 10, 2013, 10:41:47 PM
I have the feeling that 1992 will be the election that breaks the circle of boredom... 1996 will end up with the victory of the incumbent, and 2000... That's the year of Cain, Nader, and the Reform Party primary with Buchanan, Trump, Ventura and Hagelin... and I'm really going to enjoy that one.
Yeah, that will be good. Plus Bob Smith ran for the Taxpayers Party.
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04
« Reply #5 on: May 12, 2013, 01:39:10 PM »
If a tie between Perot and Paul is reached, I can see both coming together to get some form of electoral reform passed.
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04
« Reply #6 on: May 12, 2013, 06:01:08 PM »
I can't wait to see the "OMG ELECTION RIGGED BY PAULTARZ" comments if Ron wins.
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04
« Reply #7 on: May 12, 2013, 06:21:02 PM »
Quote from: Californian Tony on May 12, 2013, 06:03:01 PM
Quote from: ChairmanSanchez on May 12, 2013, 06:01:08 PM
I can't wait to see the "OMG ELECTION RIGGED BY PAULTARZ" comments if Ron wins.

Wait, what? Huh

If Paul wins, my reaction will simply be that the leftists on this game are a bunch of idiots.
I never directed that at you in particular, but rather at those who pestered Cathcon on the convention.

Quote from: Comrade Shmoo on May 12, 2013, 06:06:59 PM
Also, where were all the complainers during the Republican hegemony?
The GOP was the more progressive party at the time.
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04
« Reply #8 on: May 12, 2013, 06:26:13 PM »
Quote from: Comrade Shmoo on May 12, 2013, 06:23:54 PM
Quote from: ChairmanSanchez on May 12, 2013, 06:21:02 PM
Quote from: Comrade Shmoo on May 12, 2013, 06:06:59 PM
Also, where were all the complainers during the Republican hegemony?
The GOP was the more progressive party at the time.

...

Literally nothing you just said or implied is true. First, no they were not: the Socialists were more left-wing than them. Second, are you saying that Paul and/or Perot are more progressive than Cuomo?
Read my post again. It took a few elections before Debs got in. Do you seriously think that I believe Paul is more progressive than Cuomo. If he were more progressive than Cuomo, why would I have voted for Paul?
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04
« Reply #9 on: May 12, 2013, 06:31:59 PM »
When do the results come in?
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04
« Reply #10 on: May 12, 2013, 06:44:30 PM »
Quote from: Comrade Shmoo on May 12, 2013, 06:34:02 PM
Quote from: ChairmanSanchez on May 12, 2013, 06:26:13 PM
Quote from: Comrade Shmoo on May 12, 2013, 06:23:54 PM
Quote from: ChairmanSanchez on May 12, 2013, 06:21:02 PM
Quote from: Comrade Shmoo on May 12, 2013, 06:06:59 PM
Also, where were all the complainers during the Republican hegemony?
The GOP was the more progressive party at the time.

...

Literally nothing you just said or implied is true. First, no they were not: the Socialists were more left-wing than them. Second, are you saying that Paul and/or Perot are more progressive than Cuomo?
Read my post again. It took a few elections before Debs got in. Do you seriously think that I believe Paul is more progressive than Cuomo. If he were more progressive than Cuomo, why would I have voted for Paul?

OK, now I have no idea what you're trying to say. You said the GOP was the more progressive party at the time in response to my question, correct? I'm assuming that means that you're implying that their progressiveness was what caused them to have such a hegemony, correct? That means that you are implying that progressiveness causes an un-protested hegemony, correct? Therefore, if you are implying all that I assume you are, your argument is that the Democrats are not the more progressive party at this time, which you just admitted was not true. Also, your original post did not mention Debs at all - are you saying that in fact conservatism is what leads to acceptance of a hegemony?
What are you talking about? The vast majority of this forum is Progressive, and voted straight Republican in the 1870-1900 era. The Republicans were the more Progressive Party until Debs and the Socialists started to appear. The last thirty something years of Democratic rule in this timeline shows that they are now the more Progressive Party. You have massively misread my post.
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04
« Reply #11 on: May 12, 2013, 06:59:58 PM »
Quote from: Comrade Shmoo on May 12, 2013, 06:55:43 PM
Quote from: ChairmanSanchez on May 12, 2013, 06:44:30 PM
Quote from: Comrade Shmoo on May 12, 2013, 06:34:02 PM
Quote from: ChairmanSanchez on May 12, 2013, 06:26:13 PM
Quote from: Comrade Shmoo on May 12, 2013, 06:23:54 PM
Quote from: ChairmanSanchez on May 12, 2013, 06:21:02 PM
Quote from: Comrade Shmoo on May 12, 2013, 06:06:59 PM
Also, where were all the complainers during the Republican hegemony?
The GOP was the more progressive party at the time.

...

Literally nothing you just said or implied is true. First, no they were not: the Socialists were more left-wing than them. Second, are you saying that Paul and/or Perot are more progressive than Cuomo?
Read my post again. It took a few elections before Debs got in. Do you seriously think that I believe Paul is more progressive than Cuomo. If he were more progressive than Cuomo, why would I have voted for Paul?

OK, now I have no idea what you're trying to say. You said the GOP was the more progressive party at the time in response to my question, correct? I'm assuming that means that you're implying that their progressiveness was what caused them to have such a hegemony, correct? That means that you are implying that progressiveness causes an un-protested hegemony, correct? Therefore, if you are implying all that I assume you are, your argument is that the Democrats are not the more progressive party at this time, which you just admitted was not true. Also, your original post did not mention Debs at all - are you saying that in fact conservatism is what leads to acceptance of a hegemony?
What are you talking about? The vast majority of this forum is Progressive, and voted straight Republican in the 1870-1900 era. The Republicans were the more Progressive Party until Debs and the Socialists started to appear. The last thirty something years of Democratic rule in this timeline shows that they are now the more Progressive Party. You have massively misread my post.

I think you have massively misread my post as well. I was asking of the people who are complaining about a Democratic hegemony why they weren't complaining about the Republican hegemony.

Also, no offense, but your history is off. Debs and the Socialists first appeared in 1904, and the Republican hegemony was 1900-1920, so that means they weren't the most progressive party during the majority of the hegemony - although, make no mistake, they were progressive. 1872-1900 was anything but a hegemony for anyone. We started with one term of Woodhull of the Equal Rights Party, then two terms of Tilden and one of Cleveland, both Democrats, then one term of Douglass, a Republican, then two terms of Weaver, a Populist.
Your right, I for whatever reason recalled Ben Butler, and several other Radical Republicans being President. The people complaining about a Democratic hegemony would have complained about the earlier Republican hegemony, as LaFollette, Roosevelt, and George Norris were very Progressive. The GOP of that era was the more leftwing party, until the Socialists came to power in the 1920's.
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04
« Reply #12 on: May 13, 2013, 04:29:24 PM »
15 minutes to go...
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04
« Reply #13 on: May 13, 2013, 04:52:40 PM »
Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad Sad
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,095
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04
« Reply #14 on: May 13, 2013, 06:11:52 PM »
I think I accidently voted for Pat Buchanan Tongue.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.073 seconds with 14 queries.