Democratic WV primary + NE fake contest results thread (1st polls close @7:30ET) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 01:13:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic WV primary + NE fake contest results thread (1st polls close @7:30ET) (search mode)
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: Democratic WV primary + NE fake contest results thread (1st polls close @7:30ET)  (Read 17502 times)
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #25 on: May 10, 2016, 08:10:31 PM »

"Other" is now breaking double digits.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #26 on: May 10, 2016, 08:17:35 PM »

I'm really hoping that WV keeps its trend of never picking my choice for president. If Sanders wins here, it'll look bad for him, and it would hurt my pride. LET'S GO, HILLDAWG! COME FROM BEHIND WIN IN WV!!

I'm sorry to disappoint you, but it looks as if West Virginia is yours.  Smiley

I'm still holding out hope that Charleston comes through for her...

It can join its brother Oklahoma Smiley

Yes! These were the only two states I wanted Hillary to lose. I'm so happy. Smiley
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #27 on: May 10, 2016, 08:20:09 PM »

Yes! These were the only two states I wanted Hillary to lose. I'm so happy. Smiley

Mississippi? Alabama?

Those states are hellholes, but in a Democratic primary it's the base of the party that is voting. No problems there.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #28 on: May 10, 2016, 08:23:57 PM »
« Edited: May 10, 2016, 08:27:52 PM by IceSpear »

Yes! These were the only two states I wanted Hillary to lose. I'm so happy. Smiley

Mississippi? Alabama?

Those states are hellholes, but in a Democratic primary it's the base of the party that is voting. No problems there.

No issues with Kentucky?

Coal country isn't the entire state, thankfully. I have nothing against Louisville and Lexington. Wink
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #29 on: May 10, 2016, 08:29:08 PM »

So... looking back, how did Hillary win SW PA?

There are nowhere near as many Dixiecrats in Western PA as there are in WV. On top of that, it was closed.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #30 on: May 10, 2016, 08:45:56 PM »

Judd pulls ahead of O'Malley!
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #31 on: May 10, 2016, 08:56:52 PM »

The margin will only continue to grow as the rest of the vote comes in. Could be a 20+ point margin. Also, a county sweep now looks likely. Excellent news! Smiley
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #32 on: May 10, 2016, 09:00:47 PM »

Clinton has been projected by AP to win the Nebraska beauty contest. She's up 61% to 39% with 17% in.

Excellent! Great job Hilldawg!

Caucuses are so awful. In a normal primary Nebraska probably would've been a tight race.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #33 on: May 10, 2016, 09:10:44 PM »

I bet Hillary has a good chance of winning in my state.

South Dakota? No. The only reason Hillary is winning Nebraska is because it awarded 0 delegates, so Bernie's campaign had no reason to care.

Agreed. However, it does make me think he's not a total lock in SD, which I would've thought yesterday.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #34 on: May 10, 2016, 09:16:02 PM »

lets hope that DWS does the right thing and refuses to seat Bernie's NE delegates after the people of Nebraska, when given a fair and democratic opportunity to do so, overwhelmingly reject him!

This would actually be a good way to abolish caucuses in the future. Just dictate that any states that have them will count for no delegates, or their delegates get cut in half. Iowa can be an exception because of muh traditionz.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #35 on: May 10, 2016, 09:23:29 PM »

lets hope that DWS does the right thing and refuses to seat Bernie's NE delegates after the people of Nebraska, when given a fair and democratic opportunity to do so, overwhelmingly reject him!

This would actually be a good way to abolish caucuses in the future. Just dictate that any states that have them will count for no delegates, or their delegates get cut in half. Iowa can be an exception because of muh traditionz.

I'm up for getting rid of caucuses in exchange for every state going to open primaries or at worst modified open/closed.

I'm hoping this happens at the DNC this year. Bernie is clearly going to push for more open primaries at the convention along with reducing the amount of superdelegates, and DWS and the Clintonites clearly want to nix caucuses. It would be a great compromise.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #36 on: May 10, 2016, 09:26:44 PM »

Could Farrell crack 10%? He's approaching 9%. Judd is still beating O'Malley.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #37 on: May 10, 2016, 09:33:05 PM »

Open primaries in all 50 states is a horrible idea. You'd have Republicans picking our nominee in years without competitive GOP primaries.

That's why I'd prefer semi-closed. Sure, Republicans could all re-register, but that would apply to closed primaries as well.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #38 on: May 10, 2016, 09:36:01 PM »

De La Fuente is the only "protest candidate" with less than 1% of the vote. Called it. I knew "other" would break double digits as well. Racist WV hicks (this can be my version of angry NH women) are so predictable.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #39 on: May 10, 2016, 09:49:35 PM »

So are there any primary by primary calculations of what the most sane way of getting Sanders to the nomination is?

There are no sane ways, unless you think he can win California by 40+ points.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #40 on: May 10, 2016, 10:13:47 PM »

Were independents allowed to vote in the NE beauty contest?
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #41 on: May 10, 2016, 10:20:42 PM »

So, despite the gloating, the Nebraska primary is likely to be pretty close after all, I guess?

I mean, even if it was a tie that would be a 14 point swing. That would actually be similar to Texas in 2008. The primary and caucus were held on the same day. Hillary won the primary by 4 but lost the caucus by 12.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #42 on: May 10, 2016, 10:56:06 PM »

Carson is beating Rubio in both Nebraska and West Virginia. lol
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #43 on: May 10, 2016, 11:10:46 PM »

Honestly, that map makes Ohio stand out just as much. I still don't get why Sanders collapsed so badly in Ohio. I mean, I'm not saying he should've won it, but if demographics really are destiny, he probably should've only lost it by 3-4%.

Looks like the theory about a lot of his voters crossing over for Kasich was true. On top of that, a lot of his would-be supporters in coal country likely crossed over for Trump.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #44 on: May 10, 2016, 11:13:16 PM »

Despite trailing, Bernie is currently getting more votes in Nebraska than both he and Hillary got combined in the caucus.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #45 on: May 10, 2016, 11:32:02 PM »

I kind of want one of the 3 completely out WV counties to go for Clinton just to see Icespear's reaction.

I actually didn't think there would be a county sweep. I figured she'd win Jefferson and Kanawha at least, and maybe a couple other random ones. It was a pleasant surprise rather than an expectation, so I wouldn't be too disappointed.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #46 on: May 10, 2016, 11:36:48 PM »

Despite trailing, Bernie is currently getting more votes in Nebraska than both he and Hillary got combined in the caucus.

Are those actual votes in the caucus, though? Usually, with caucuses, they count county delegates, not raw votes. A lot of people made that mistake in WA, where hundreds of thousands of people voted, but some people floated the argument that it was only 27,000, because WA counts district delegates instead of votes.

They're actual votes. Iowa, Nevada, Maine, Washington, and Wyoming were the ones that didn't release a popular vote total, according to Wikipedia.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #47 on: May 10, 2016, 11:51:39 PM »

Despite trailing, Bernie is currently getting more votes in Nebraska than both he and Hillary got combined in the caucus.

Are those actual votes in the caucus, though? Usually, with caucuses, they count county delegates, not raw votes. A lot of people made that mistake in WA, where hundreds of thousands of people voted, but some people floated the argument that it was only 27,000, because WA counts district delegates instead of votes.

They're actual votes. Iowa, Nevada, Maine, Washington, and Wyoming were the ones that didn't release a popular vote total, according to Wikipedia.

I see. Well, if that's the case, Hillary's margin of victory in the primary in terms of actual votes looks like it'll be pretty much identical to Sanders' in the caucus. I'd definitely bet on Sanders winning the beauty contest in WA, since WA was a far more substantial win for him, but it'll probably be by 5-10%.

On that note, Washington in particular not releasing a popular vote hurts him pretty bad in the PV count. The others are too small to really matter much.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #48 on: May 11, 2016, 01:07:23 AM »

The final county to report, mineral county, gives Bernie Sanders the sweep of West Virginia.

Source: New York Times

Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

« Reply #49 on: May 11, 2016, 01:14:34 AM »

Democrats should just go back to being pro-coal - it's difficult for republicans to get to 270 without West Virginia and Kentucky.

Alison Lundergan Grimes and Natalie Tennant were pro coal. Grimes even hit McConnell in ads for being not pro coal enough. How did that work out again?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 13 queries.