Opinion of the French Revolution (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2024, 02:34:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Opinion of the French Revolution (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Well, are you a royalist or a Jacobin?
#1
Freedom Revolution
 
#2
Horrible Revolution
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 42

Author Topic: Opinion of the French Revolution  (Read 1013 times)
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,853
Ireland, Republic of


« on: November 03, 2013, 01:32:57 PM »

I'm annoyed that I'm the first person to reference Zhou Enlai in this thread.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,853
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2013, 01:55:54 PM »


FR until the Mountain seized power, HR afterwards

That's when it became a Freedom Revolution.

Because nothing says freedom like mass executions of political opponents.

The post-Robespierre executions of the Jacobins were actually worse in total number than the executions the Jacobins committed [/themoreyouknow]
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,853
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #2 on: November 03, 2013, 02:16:56 PM »

I see everyone has already successfully ignored my point.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,853
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #3 on: November 03, 2013, 02:28:53 PM »

I see everyone has already successfully ignored my point.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

It wouldn't be surprising that a ruling clase with absolutely no governing experience and nothing to guide them except beautiful but extremely abstract ideals would screw up big time. Considering that, the few things they did get more or less right (raising one of the first modern army and leading it to modest but significant success, reforming the administrative system and setting up a series of rules that would endure for a while) are what is most striking.

But again, the "quality of governance" (so to speak) is not really what matters about the Revolution. What matters is the broad principles it inspired and the effects these principles had over the 19th century, bringing about a paradigmatic change of unequaled proportions.

The gif is there is because what Cassius said is blatantly and obviously false. Perhaps the least historically accurate said in Atlas History that wasn't in a "Hitler was a leftist" thread.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,853
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #4 on: November 03, 2013, 03:02:47 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

This is another myth.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,853
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #5 on: November 03, 2013, 03:28:44 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

This is another myth.

Mind to elaborate? I have the memory that the European powers were scared sh*tless about what was going on in France and more or less ready to come over to "fix things up".

No. That's the myth. Rather the European powers stood on the sidelines unsure what to make of the situation (but were somewhat glad that France was self-destructing as it was clearly a threat to all of them; remember this was during a period of nearly endless European war). The war was caused by the Girondin government's paranoia that the European powers - especially Austria - were out to destroy the revolution (thus the myth). Danton was, ironically given what happened later, particularly prominent in whipping up both the sans cullotes and the General Assembly on this iirc.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,853
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #6 on: November 03, 2013, 03:58:53 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

This is another myth.

Mind to elaborate? I have the memory that the European powers were scared sh*tless about what was going on in France and more or less ready to come over to "fix things up".

No. That's the myth. Rather the European powers stood on the sidelines unsure what to make of the situation (but were somewhat glad that France was self-destructing as it was clearly a threat to all of them; remember this was during a period of nearly endless European war). The war was caused by the Girondin government's paranoia that the European powers - especially Austria - were out to destroy the revolution (thus the myth). Danton was, ironically given what happened later, particularly prominent in whipping up both the sans cullotes and the General Assembly on this iirc.

It is true that the Girondins' promptness played a key role in causing the war, but I would still think that the tangible possibility of an invasion to restore the monarchy existed at the time. There was Brunswick's ultimatum, which, as symbolic as it was, clearly that Europe wasn't willing to sit and watch while monarchy was being overthrown. And while these countries were traditional enemies of France, the familial connections between the French and other monarchs could certainly raise some reasonable suspicions of where their sympathies were.

Quite a lot of states were alarmed by what was happening to the Monarchs but not enough to launch a military campaign against Europe's most developed large state and the states were wrapped up in their own affairs anyway. Besides the Monarchs weren't fully overthrown until months after France had declared war and what worried those involved was partly that Marie Antoinette was an Austrian spy....
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 14 queries.