House Bill: The Department of Peace Resolution (Failed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 30, 2024, 01:00:46 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  House Bill: The Department of Peace Resolution (Failed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: House Bill: The Department of Peace Resolution (Failed)  (Read 2935 times)
Unconditional Surrender Truman
Harry S Truman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,139


« on: April 09, 2017, 09:06:24 PM »

I offer my thanks to the governor for his amendment, which adequately addresses the concerns I had raised with regard to the constitutionality of this legislation. I would suggest that the language of Section 1 be amended as follows, in order to codify this proposal as a resolution (i.e. a formal recommendation) as opposed to an ordinary law.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Unconditional Surrender Truman
Harry S Truman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,139


« Reply #1 on: April 14, 2017, 11:46:28 PM »

I still don't like the idea of Congress establishing "executive offices." The whole point of the ConCon reforms in this area was to take that power away from the legislature and give it to the president; while technically the POA still has the final say on whether this becomes a thing (as result of his veto power), establishing this office as an Act of Congress rather than through an Executive Order prevents him from making unilateral changes to the structure of this office as may be necessary.

I get the feeling I'm talking to a brick wall here, but I would urge Congress not to establish a precedent of legislative meddling in the structure of the Executive Branch. A "resolution" is no better than a bill if it mandates the creation of a new office (which is what this does), and making the "Special Commissioner" independent of oversight by the officers of the cabinet is even worse. That the president may unilaterally create and disband executive offices is one of the great strengths of our Constitution; it allows administrations to rapidly adapt to meet changes in the structure and needs of the game and allows the president to quickly reorganize the cabinet to fit the priorities of their administration. That power will be far less useful if Congress gets into the business of creating new "executive" offices whenever it sees fit, and as someone who has been both president and a federal legislator, I find that prospect most unsatisfactory.
Logged
Unconditional Surrender Truman
Harry S Truman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,139


« Reply #2 on: April 27, 2017, 08:26:21 PM »


Whenever a bill suggests something, a player comes out to denounce suggestions in bills.
Right. Bills should never phrase their provisions in the form of suggestions, because they are bills (i.e. their purpose is to become binding law). A resolution, on the other hand, is definitionally a suggestion, and so ought be phrased as such. That is the distinction.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 11 queries.