SENATE BILL: Promoting Responsible Foreign Investment Act of 2014 (Failed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 20, 2024, 02:12:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: Promoting Responsible Foreign Investment Act of 2014 (Failed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: Promoting Responsible Foreign Investment Act of 2014 (Failed)  (Read 1718 times)
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« on: June 28, 2014, 06:52:08 AM »
« edited: July 07, 2014, 06:12:54 AM by Senator North Carolina Yankee »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsor: TNF
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2014, 06:58:24 AM »

You have 24 hours to begin advoacy, Senator.


Section 2 is a counter-productive protectionist measure that arbitrarily selects 50% and prefers to opt for 0% over 25% or 30%.

Section 3 could jeopardize our ability to recycle our debts when necessary and cause a spike in interest rates if not worse.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2014, 10:41:55 AM »

I am not really concerned about section one. Though I think a better approach would be to require that all foreign companies comply with all federal labor laws, which would include the "Employer Non-Interference Act".

Rebuilding a country in a world destroyed by War where there is only one economy left undamanged is one thing. Competing in a world where there is a global competition and millions of new customers coming online all the time in the Emerging Markets is another.

I am concerned as well, but a large part of the reason we depend on them for that is because of our deficits and these bonds are traded on a market. If we restrict the pool of buyers, then the prices of the bonds would drop, and the interest rates rise unavoidably and considering our present economic situation, that is not desirable.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #3 on: July 02, 2014, 02:11:31 AM »

This can be put to a vote in about five hours.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #4 on: July 03, 2014, 04:10:24 AM »

Senators, this is now at final vote, please vote Aye, Nay or Abstain.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #5 on: July 04, 2014, 04:26:54 AM »

This is one vote away from failing.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #6 on: July 04, 2014, 04:27:44 AM »

And apparently, I haven't voted yet so problem solved.

NAY

This has enough votes to fail, Senators have 24 hours to change their votes.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #7 on: July 05, 2014, 06:31:05 AM »

This can be ended as well.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #8 on: July 05, 2014, 10:05:36 AM »

Yea, bore is fine.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 10 queries.