OK.
My buddy TNF has since written me that Section 1 might not be necessary, given that the
Sweet Sixteen Act makes sixteen the legal age of majority. I'm not sure that there'd be any harm in redundancy - at the time I conceived this idea, the
drinking age was eighteen.Regardless of the reduction in age, I think it's important that we discuss reforming the penalties. Assuming that these laws haven't previously been reformed, here's the status:
citationMy concern is that the level of enforcement is relative to how outraged a pissed off parent or overzealous judge is. Given how the law enforced, my concern is that this is inherently regressive (perhaps less so due to the Roscoe Conkling Equity Before Law Act.) However, I think we need to liberalize the penalties a bit.
Here's the Massachusetts statute:
citationThat doesn't seem very constructive to me.