Democrats: Is there ANY scenario in which you would possibly vote for Nader?

[Joe Republic]

Still not getting the message, are you?

[Joe Republic]

Why the heck is Ralph Nader *still* being talked about?

[Joe Republic]

What did he accomplish through his 2004 campaign?

Answer: He won dramatically less votes than he did in 1996 (in which he wasn't even the most notable third party candidate), thus returning him to the mysts of political irrelevance.  Therefore;

Why the heck is Ralph Nader *still* being talked about?

[Joe Republic]

Exactly. He made himself irrelevant and destroyed any clout he had as an activist. So what was the point?

Furthermore, Nader didn't challenge or damage the two-party system, he SOLIDIFIED it. Nader destroyed any possibility of a strong third party candidacy similar to Perot for 20 years at leasts.

Once again, you completely missed my point.  As I've already shown you - and you've agreed - Ralph Nader is now entirely irrelevant.  And yet you've created 83 threads so far that are either about him or mention him in some way.

Why are you *still* talking about him?

[Joe Republic]

Exactly. He made himself irrelevant and destroyed any clout he had as an activist. So what was the point?

Furthermore, Nader didn't challenge or damage the two-party system, he SOLIDIFIED it. Nader destroyed any possibility of a strong third party candidacy similar to Perot for 20 years at leasts.

Once again, you completely missed my point.  As I've already shown you - and you've agreed - Ralph Nader is now entirely irrelevant.  And yet you've created 83 threads so far that are either about him or mention him in some way.

Why are you *still* talking about him?

Probably conditioning from DU. He still gets trashed daily there.

That's nice, but here in the world of the sane and rational, people are getting extremely tired of your obsession with something that officially stopped being important nearly three years ago.

At least CARLHAYDEN's tedious pet issue is still politically relevant.