Useless Defense Spending Repeal Bill (Withdrawn) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 06, 2024, 11:17:10 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Useless Defense Spending Repeal Bill (Withdrawn) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Useless Defense Spending Repeal Bill (Withdrawn)  (Read 2427 times)
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

« on: April 14, 2006, 06:17:30 PM »
« edited: April 14, 2006, 07:05:26 PM by Senator Dave Hawk »

As Secretary of Defense, I am coming out in opposition to this bill. As a country, we cannot simply give up on developing a workable missile defense system, as this bill calls for. If we can develop this system, it will enable us to better negotiate with the North Koreans in our efforts to get them to disband their nuclear arsenal. We can negotiate more effectively from a position of strength than one of weakness, and whether we can defend ourselves from an attack is part of what determines that. This is in reality a security measure, and if we can create a workable missile defense system, the Atlasian people will be safer. This is not some ego thing for the military to be even stronger than the rest of the world, this is a national security matter. We must be prepared. The risk is too big not to be.

It is worth noting that we are only spending $1 billion per year, which is only 10% of what was originally allotted in the old, real life budget.

I concur with the Secretary's oppostion to this Bill for the reasons he has stated

'Hawk'
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2006, 08:56:41 AM »

This Bill is not in our national interest. I'm of the firm conviction that having a missile defense system will strengthen our hand at the negotiating table

I, therefore, vote Nay

'Hawk'
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 11 queries.