Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 02:16:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET)  (Read 28316 times)
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,972
« on: March 26, 2016, 03:04:11 PM »
Hesus, Sanders is going to be around 80% here.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,972
« Reply #1 on: March 26, 2016, 03:27:49 PM »
So far, Clinton is doing about 10.5 points worse than in '08. That puts her at around 24%. This would be the first ever caucus where she did worse than in '08, except Nevada.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,972
« Reply #2 on: March 26, 2016, 03:29:30 PM »
Alcon, who did you caucus for?
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,972
« Reply #3 on: March 26, 2016, 03:31:03 PM »
Holy sh**t, Clinton may not even be viable.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,972
« Reply #4 on: March 26, 2016, 03:34:45 PM »
98% in a 17th of Seattle, though? The last time I saw 98% anywhere on Atlas for an election result was FDR's numbers from South Carolina in 1930s era elections.

Just to show you I'm not freaking out though, it heartens me to see that Clinton has actually won a precinct (called "Silver Spurs"):

https://twitter.com/katherinelong/status/713796204912443393
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,972
« Reply #5 on: March 26, 2016, 03:37:35 PM »
You could probably find more Sanders opponents at a Sanders rally than the West Seattle Caucus... I'm sure some people just went for the lolz or to accompany friends.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,972
« Reply #6 on: March 26, 2016, 03:39:26 PM »
I am sick and tired of Sanders supporters underplaying their man's chances. If you thought it wouldn't change anything, you guys wouldn't be out there supporting him. He was supposed to win by 30 points. This is absurd.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,972
« Reply #7 on: March 26, 2016, 03:53:37 PM »
Clinton's support in Cowlitz county nearly cut in half from 2008 (40% to 23%). She's going to be just ahead in viability if what comes in so far holds... below viability if the 98% in West Seattle holds.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,972
« Reply #8 on: March 26, 2016, 03:54:45 PM »
I also love all the people on here who are like "Beet! Quit being unreasonable! Your candidate only has 2% of the vote in 1/17th of a major urban center! Stop freaking out!"
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,972
« Reply #9 on: March 26, 2016, 03:58:19 PM »
Only Grand Rapids and Austin weren't caucuses. But he he probably would have won Boise, Salt Lake City at least.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,972
« Reply #10 on: March 26, 2016, 04:08:36 PM »
They don't have the population, but they sure as hell have the delegates. Sanders just made up over 500,000 vote deficit from Florida today.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,972
« Reply #11 on: March 26, 2016, 04:17:24 PM »
Someone on twitter is claiming the 98% Sanders thing is a lie.

https://twitter.com/withmeyourheart/status/713826069296451584

1484 is the number of the precinct, they say. The actual result is 28-11. If people would stop lying and posting bad information, we would maybe be able to have reasonable analysis.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,972
« Reply #12 on: March 26, 2016, 05:31:22 PM »
Soccer moms work too.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 11 queries.