Would Sittenfield be doing better than Strickland? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 05:57:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Would Sittenfield be doing better than Strickland? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Would Sittenfield be doing better than Strickland?  (Read 2113 times)
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« on: August 23, 2016, 04:09:05 PM »

Sittenfeld would have provided a much stronger debate. He could have won using the same method as Sherrod Brown used in 2012: campaign as a staunch, sane progressive and someone fully supportive of Obama besides on maybe TPP and healthcare. Granted, Portman's a stronger opponent than Mandel, but Clinton v. Trump could be more lopsided than Obama v. Romney was. I think his top surrogates in the state would be Sherrod Brown, Richard Celeste, Mark Mallory, Tracy Heard, Tom Sawyer, and Obama.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2016, 07:48:42 AM »

nah

I'm not sure if there's a Democrat out there that would be doing better - maybe Cordray?
But everyone on Atlas told me Tim Ryan is invincible and definitely not a paper tiger.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 8 queries.