Will the foreign embassies crises be Obama's defining moment?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 12:56:08 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Will the foreign embassies crises be Obama's defining moment?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Will the foreign embassies crises be Obama's defining moment?  (Read 906 times)
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 15, 2012, 01:01:10 PM »

Please discuss.
Logged
Warren 4 Secretary of Everything
Clinton1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,209
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2012, 01:06:14 PM »

The killing of Osama Bin Laden, rescuing the manufacturing industry, or saving the country from economic free fall are probably Obama's defining moments. The embassies are foreign policy crisese that need to be addressed swiftly, and decisively by the administration for risk of them becoming defining moments.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,996


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2012, 01:06:40 PM »

Obama has already had plenty of defining moments. And they've defined him as a strong, hard-working and intelligent leader.
Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 15, 2012, 03:40:39 PM »

It's been Romney's defining moment.  The public's perception of Obama is pretty much gelled after he's been president for four years.  Romney on the other hand is more nebulous, by design; he's trying to give as few details about his plans as possible.  But, panicking a bit on account of Obama's post-convention surge and the clock running out, Romney tried to depart from his safe game and instead seized on an international crisis to launch a political attack against Obama and flopped.  The backlash against Romney was harsh and bipartisan.  With less than two months to go, he committed an unforced error and very possibly lost the election with it.
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,635
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 15, 2012, 03:59:22 PM »

No.
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2012, 04:16:05 PM »
« Edited: September 15, 2012, 04:42:30 PM by Politico »

It's been Romney's defining moment.  The public's perception of Obama is pretty much gelled after he's been president for four years.  Romney on the other hand is more nebulous, by design; he's trying to give as few details about his plans as possible.  But, panicking a bit on account of Obama's post-convention surge and the clock running out, Romney tried to depart from his safe game and instead seized on an international crisis to launch a political attack against Obama and flopped.  The backlash against Romney was harsh and bipartisan.  With less than two months to go, he committed an unforced error and very possibly lost the election with it.

Wishful thinking. Obama's failure to stand strong with Israel has cost him a lot more votes than anything Romney has said in the past week.

Being the first president since Carter to have an embassy overrun with its ambassador being assassinated is not exactly projecting an image of American strength. At best, it is the USS Cole for Obama (which probably hurt Gore, the incumbent, but only by a negligible amount); at worst, it is going to snowball into the Iranian Hostage Crisis circa November 1980 (i.e., devastating effect for the incumbent).
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 15, 2012, 04:30:47 PM »

Considering they're dying down already, probably not.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 15, 2012, 10:23:41 PM »

For the love of God, give it up.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 15, 2012, 11:21:52 PM »

For the love of God, Romney give it up.

Fixed.  While this issue isn't hurting Mitt directly, it is distracting his campaign from its main message of the economy, which is one that is far more likely to have a chance to work.  If Allah forbid, this should take a turn for the worse, then the blathering the Mittbots are doing now will be inconsequential in making this something that will damage The O.
Logged
wan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 455
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 15, 2012, 11:39:25 PM »

It's been Romney's defining moment.  The public's perception of Obama is pretty much gelled after he's been president for four years.  Romney on the other hand is more nebulous, by design; he's trying to give as few details about his plans as possible.  But, panicking a bit on account of Obama's post-convention surge and the clock running out, Romney tried to depart from his safe game and instead seized on an international crisis to launch a political attack against Obama and flopped.  The backlash against Romney was harsh and bipartisan.  With less than two months to go, he committed an unforced error and very possibly lost the election with it.

Wishful thinking. Obama's failure to stand strong with Israel has cost him a lot more votes than anything Romney has said in the past week.

Being the first president since Carter to have an embassy overrun with its ambassador being assassinated is not exactly projecting an image of American strength. At best, it is the USS Cole for Obama (which probably hurt Gore, the incumbent, but only by a negligible amount); at worst, it is going to snowball into the Iranian Hostage Crisis circa November 1980 (i.e., devastating effect for the incumbent).


Really? I don't think so. I just saw a poll where Obama was beating Romney with the Jewish vote 2-1. Lol...
Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 16, 2012, 01:05:01 AM »

This election, even less than usual, will not be decided on foreign policy. Which is a shame, really, because if both policies were properly and intelligently discussed by the electorate, whoever won, the US would be in a much stronger position.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.232 seconds with 13 queries.