Rob Simmons: NRSC Enamored with Self-funders (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 01:15:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Rob Simmons: NRSC Enamored with Self-funders (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Rob Simmons: NRSC Enamored with Self-funders  (Read 2358 times)
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« on: December 25, 2010, 12:54:06 AM »

I guess that maybe another candidate might have ran better in California than Fiorina, but I wouldn't bet on it - Fiorina ran pretty much as generic R, and besides, didn't really self-fund much (note that who did self-fund performed worse...).  Still wouldn't have won.

As for Connecticut, we're basically talking the same issue. 

Just FYI, remember that in Illinois, Kirk got 1) an incredibly weak opponent; 2) an Illinois Dem party that doesn't mind him being in *that much*, especially if Giannoulias' legal problems are serious; 3) a year in 2010 where the swing in Illinois (and the upper Midwest in general) was quite stronger than the nation as a whole.

Pennsylvania is not comparable to California or Connecticut.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #1 on: December 25, 2010, 01:05:08 AM »

Didn't the NRSC spend a crapton of money in California? Like eight frickin' million dollars?  That's not an unknown fact, right?

I think anyone who pays attention to politics knows it.  Of course, spending $8 million in CA is akin to throwing money down the drain regardless of who is the Republican (self-funder or not).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 10 queries.