Battle of the bads 2.0 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 17, 2024, 02:04:32 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Battle of the bads 2.0 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who was the worse candidate?
#1
Martha Coakley
 
#2
Alex Sink
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 61

Author Topic: Battle of the bads 2.0  (Read 962 times)
Flake
Flo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


« on: October 26, 2014, 04:56:06 PM »

Sink's a really good candidate on paper, but a terrible campaigner. That's why she blew a double digit lead and lost to Scott in 2010. She shouldn't have visited every county in the state, she needed to focus on the major cities, and she needed to focus on hispanic voters. There's a reason she won Osceola by a measly 6%. She also didn't put much effort into her groundgame and like Mitt Romney, she's super awkward when talking to large audiences.

Of course that's nothing compared to how awful Coakley is.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 14 queries.