SENATE BILL: 2011 Tax Code Bill (On the President's desk) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 05:38:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: 2011 Tax Code Bill (On the President's desk) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: 2011 Tax Code Bill (On the President's desk)  (Read 6713 times)
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,172


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
« on: September 26, 2011, 11:09:32 AM »

accepted as friendly.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,172


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2011, 07:27:56 PM »

It would be 60% on all income above $2.5 million, but yeah, I agree. That said, this new plan is better than our current system. I will support it over what we currently have.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,172


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2011, 12:50:06 AM »

I could potentially agree to a 50%+ tax on incomes above something like $5 million or to a level where the next dollar you earn really doesn't matter. I also think middle class taxes could go lower in this case,say 20% for incomes up to $80,000, but that is neither here nor there. Job persecution aside, the middle class is the class that will lead our continual economic recovery by spending money. This bill does not close loopholes and deductions though, so dropping rates too much may have a negative effect on the budget, which I want to avoid.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,172


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
« Reply #3 on: September 30, 2011, 08:58:56 PM »

Aye
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,172


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
« Reply #4 on: October 02, 2011, 02:51:10 PM »

JBrase's amendment would have to be complimented with a massive decrease in federal spending which, in turn, would have a detrimental effect on the economy in the short term. Like I said in the past, I am in favor of closing out loopholes and deductions and lowering overall rates, but that's only once the economy is on a firm footing and the budget is in check. Things like that much be done over time, not all at once.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,172


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
« Reply #5 on: October 04, 2011, 10:59:11 AM »

nay
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,172


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
« Reply #6 on: October 06, 2011, 11:38:39 AM »

Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 8 queries.