2016 Senate Ratings and Predictions
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 04, 2024, 04:58:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2016 Senate Ratings and Predictions
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15
Author Topic: 2016 Senate Ratings and Predictions  (Read 52748 times)
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #250 on: December 12, 2015, 04:30:00 PM »

There you go again. The Pubs have a better chance of holding Wisconsin and Illinois than NH. Where is that laugh track you just linked to?  Tongue

Yes, IL and WI are much more Republican-friendly states than NH. Ayotte's at 42% right now, that's not good for an incumbent Republican in a blue state where most undecideds are Democrats. Also keep in mind that Carol Shea-Porter is going to Blanche Frank Guinta in the 1st district while Hillary Clinton is going to crush the Republican nominee, that won't help Ayotte in her reelection bid. I just don't think that enough women will split their ticket and support Clinton/Kuster or Shea-Porter/Ayotte. Hassan is quite beloved in NH, more so than Ayotte - especially among female voters. This would have been Leans/Likely R with Pappas, no doubt about it, but Hassan will be the nominee, so...

Come on...

Last Illinois Senate race... 11 point D margin vs 3 point D margin for NH
Last presidential race... 17 point D margin vs 6 point D margin for NH

Its ridiculous and you know it. Please stop before I ignore you.
Logged
Attorney General & Senator Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,731
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #251 on: December 12, 2015, 04:30:15 PM »

There you go again. The Pubs have a better chance of holding Wisconsin and Illinois than NH. Where is that laugh track you just linked to?  Tongue

Yes, IL and WI are much more Republican-friendly states than NH. Ayotte's at 42% right now, that's not good for an incumbent Republican in a blue state where most undecideds are Democrats. Also keep in mind that Carol Shea-Porter is going to Blanche Frank Guinta in the 1st district while Hillary Clinton is going to crush the Republican nominee, that won't help Ayotte in her reelection bid. I just don't think that enough women will split their ticket and support Clinton/Kuster or Shea-Porter/Ayotte. Hassan is quite beloved in NH, more so than Ayotte - especially among female voters. This would have been Leans/Likely R with Pappas, no doubt about it, but Hassan will be the nominee, so...

Guinta is going to be primaried by Dan Innis, who will easily defeat Shea-Porter.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,887
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #252 on: December 12, 2015, 04:46:41 PM »

IL, WI, CO & NH are lean D and NV & FL are tossup. While Pa leans GOP, Katie McGinty can unseat Toomey for a 51/49 senate.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #253 on: December 12, 2015, 04:53:14 PM »

Come on...

Last Illinois Senate race... 11 point D margin vs 3 point D margin for NH
Last presidential race... 17 point D margin vs 6 point D margin for NH

Its ridiculous and you know it. Please stop before I ignore you.

Republicans often come close to winning in NH but they never actually win there. Since 2010, Republicans have won six statewide races in WI, five statewide races in IL but just one statewide race in NH. And yet this forum seems to assume that NH is a much more competitive state than WI because reasons.

New Hampshire only has one statewide elected office - the Governor. Kind of unfair to judge it that way. Johnson is sitting at low 40's, and in the last poll he was at 38. Feingold is at nearly a majority in  all the polls conducted so far. How does Johnson have a better chance of winning than Ayotte?
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,839
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #254 on: December 19, 2015, 05:36:58 PM »

Iowa -- Senator Grassley is at 53% approval, according to PPP.

What happened to the map?
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,668
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #255 on: December 19, 2015, 05:48:57 PM »

There you go again. The Pubs have a better chance of holding Wisconsin and Illinois than NH. Where is that laugh track you just linked to?  Tongue

Yes, IL and WI are much more Republican-friendly states than NH. Ayotte's at 42% right now, that's not good for an incumbent Republican in a blue state where most undecideds are Democrats. Also keep in mind that Carol Shea-Porter is going to Blanche Frank Guinta in the 1st district while Hillary Clinton is going to crush the Republican nominee, that won't help Ayotte in her reelection bid. I just don't think that enough women will split their ticket and support Clinton/Kuster or Shea-Porter/Ayotte. Hassan is quite beloved in NH, more so than Ayotte - especially among female voters. This would have been Leans/Likely R with Pappas, no doubt about it, but Hassan will be the nominee, so...

Guinta is going to be primaried by Dan Innis, who will easily defeat Shea-Porter.

NH-1 will be a toss up regards of the candidates.
Logged
Attorney General & Senator Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,731
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #256 on: December 19, 2015, 06:03:49 PM »

Iowa -- Senator Grassley is at 53% approval, according to PPP.

What happened to the map?

Go through your posts and find it......
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #257 on: December 19, 2015, 07:57:55 PM »
« Edited: December 19, 2015, 08:02:06 PM by ElectionsGuy »

December Update:



 - NH still a toss-up, but predicting Hassan victory.
 - NV still a toss-up, but predicting Cortez-Matso victory.
 - PA now a toss-up, but still predicting Toomey victory.

Reasoning:

NH: Despite NH being a near toss-up in every poll, Ayotte is below 45% in nearly all polls conducted against Hassan, a somewhat weak position. There's reason to believe that the undecideds in New Hampshire are generally Democratic leaning, that's based on past presidential and Senate results. So Hassan is slightly favored at this point to take it

NV: With Trump increasingly likely to be the nominee, I see Democrats winning Nevada (with a large Latino vote) as increasingly likely. Joe Heck is a very strong contender, and polls are varied, but the fundamentals point towards Democrats winning this one.

PA: We know by election day that the polls that have Toomey up double digits won't last. This will be a competitive race. Today's polarization and elections basically guarantee the race won't be a blowout for either party (case in point - Wolf vs Corbett was only a 10 point margin despite some polls polls showing upwards of 20 points). I'm still predicting a Toomey win, nontheless.

Some other comments...

FL: Don't know who the Republican nominee will be for months, most Republicans don't know either. This will be a toss-up and I will default to predicting a Republican win here (even with Murphy) until the nomination is settled

AZ: A poll just came out with McCain being over 50%, even though the fundamentals suggest McCain is in trouble. Right now I have it at 'Lean R', but if Kirkpatrick shows no sign of improvement, I will move it to 'Likely R'.

NC: Even though Burr has consistently led, a competitive presidential and governor race will probably limit Burr's margin, and I suspect most of the undecideds thus far are Democrats. So while I would want to move it to 'Likely R', I don't think its appropriate yet.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #258 on: December 20, 2015, 12:54:09 AM »

I'm amazed that people still think Kirkpatrick can beat McCain. AZ truly is the ultimate fool's gold state.

I don't think many people think Kirkpatrick can beat McCain.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,887
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #259 on: December 20, 2015, 05:43:44 PM »

AZ is going opposite of Ca, NM, NV, CO & OR.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,283
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #260 on: December 21, 2015, 01:57:35 AM »

I'm amazed that people still think Kirkpatrick can beat McCain. AZ truly is the ultimate fool's gold state.

I don't think many people think Kirkpatrick can beat McCain.

Then why rate the race "Lean R"?

Same reason you rate the NH senate race as "Lean D", when we all know that Ayotte is doomed in utlra-super-dark-blue-more-Democratic-than-DC-and-San-Francisco-combined New Hampshire Vermont.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #261 on: December 24, 2015, 11:46:39 PM »

I'm amazed that people still think Kirkpatrick can beat McCain. AZ truly is the ultimate fool's gold state.

I don't think many people think Kirkpatrick can beat McCain.

Then why rate the race "Lean R"?

Because McCain has an advantage but his approvals, Kirkpatrick being a strong and electable challenger, and Trump being the possible nominee all lead to a supposed close race. The fundamentals are far more important than the polls right now.

Same way I rate Colorado as Lean D, I don't expect a Republican to win Bennet's seat, but it could happen.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,887
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #262 on: December 25, 2015, 01:25:43 AM »
« Edited: December 25, 2015, 01:30:15 AM by OC »

Ayotte is the same moderate as Susan Collins, but Collins is unbeatable than Ayotte due to the fact that Collins in an entrenched incumbant & she voted as a tag team with Olympia Snowe  until she retired.  All three moderates King included voted to fund planned parenthood, which Ayotte voted against

Bennet isnt losing due to the fact planned parenthood, which is in the center of Colorado, and McConnell put GoP on record defunding it along with Cruz, in repeal of Obamacare.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,887
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #263 on: March 02, 2016, 05:15:10 PM »



Lol Sestak
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,533
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #264 on: May 25, 2016, 09:19:48 AM »

Lol Iowa at Safe R
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,276
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #265 on: May 25, 2016, 09:22:04 AM »


Sorry, but there is zero evidence that suggests that this race is even remotely competitive. Not even the Clinton campaign considers Grassley vulnerable.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #266 on: May 25, 2016, 10:01:06 AM »


Sorry, but there is zero evidence that suggests that this race is even remotely competitive. Not even the Clinton campaign considers Grassley vulnerable.
The only Democrat who could've made the race competitive is Vilsack, and he declined.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #267 on: May 25, 2016, 10:06:39 AM »


Sorry, but there is zero evidence that suggests that this race is even remotely competitive. Not even the Clinton campaign considers Grassley vulnerable.
The only Democrat who could've made the race competitive is Vilsack, and he declined.

We can be glad that Grassley is running in Iowa and not New Hampshire Smiley
Too bad Ayotte isn't facing a male Democrat. There's no way he'd win women by Climbing Maggie margins.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,283
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #268 on: May 25, 2016, 10:27:03 AM »

Logged
Pragmatic Conservative
1184AZ
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,735


Political Matrix
E: 3.00, S: -0.41

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #269 on: May 25, 2016, 02:23:10 PM »
« Edited: May 25, 2016, 02:25:16 PM by Pacific Councilor 1184AZ »



90% Shading Safe
60% Shading Likely
30% Shading Lean
Green Tossup

 
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #270 on: May 25, 2016, 02:26:37 PM »



90% Shading Safe
60% Shading Likely
30% Shading Lean
Green Tossup

 
I'd switch NH and FL.
Logged
Attorney General & Senator Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,731
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #271 on: May 31, 2016, 04:20:18 PM »

Assuming Killary is nominated:

All R-held seats but IL: Safe R
Likely R: IL, NV
Lean R: CO, MD, OR
Toss-Up: WA
Lean D: CT, VT
Likely D: HI, NY, CA
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #272 on: May 31, 2016, 09:52:21 PM »

Assuming Killary is nominated:

All R-held seats but IL: Safe R
Likely R: IL, NV
Lean R: CO, MD, OR
Toss-Up: WA
Lean D: CT, VT
Likely D: HI, NY, CA

Oh you're doing an annoying parody persona now?
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #273 on: June 17, 2016, 12:59:44 PM »



Arizona: Lean R --> Toss-Up
Iowa: Safe R --> Likely R
Nevada: Toss-Up --> Lean D

Florida stays Toss-Up even if Rubio runs for re-election.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,533
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #274 on: June 17, 2016, 01:57:28 PM »


Logged
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.08 seconds with 11 queries.