Public Utility Holding Company Act (PUHCA) of 1935 repealed (almost) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 03, 2024, 12:35:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Public Utility Holding Company Act (PUHCA) of 1935 repealed (almost) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Public Utility Holding Company Act (PUHCA) of 1935 repealed (almost)  (Read 739 times)
Richard
Richius
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,369


Political Matrix
E: 8.40, S: 2.80

« on: June 30, 2005, 10:11:01 AM »
« edited: June 30, 2005, 10:29:44 AM by Richard R. »

http://dailykos.com/story/2005/6/29/17388/9747

Excellent news.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


Seeing the neo-commies cry:

The Senate, with bipartisan support, voted to repeal one of the most hard fought and important components of FDR's New Deal Tuesday and there's narily a mention of it anywhere.

The component I'm referring to is PUHCA (Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935). Both the Senate and House bills repeal this historic measure. And though it's not as big as repealing Social Security, it comes awefully close.

Get this straight people: This is the most important legislation to pass the Senate in years. It is a green-light for a return of the energy monopolies of the 20s and 30s. It is a green-light for the kind of market manipulation and price gouging that Enron engaged in in California -- except on a national scale.


Good thing, eh?  Now since the House and Senate versions differ, it is going to a committee for reconciliation.  Hopefully the end will result will be the PUHCA being dead.
Logged
Richard
Richius
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,369


Political Matrix
E: 8.40, S: 2.80

« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2005, 10:20:54 AM »

And it was bipartison too!  The only Democrats that voted against this were:

Corzine (D-NJ)
Feingold (D-WI)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Nelson (D-FL)
Reed (D-RI)
Schumer (D-NY)
Wyden (D-OR)
Logged
Richard
Richius
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,369


Political Matrix
E: 8.40, S: 2.80

« Reply #2 on: July 01, 2005, 10:17:12 AM »

Another step towards the world of 1890!

I hope we don't get that socialist.

Anyway, what's the name of the bill/act?
The energy bill.  It was tacked on somewhere in the bill, a one liner.
Logged
Richard
Richius
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,369


Political Matrix
E: 8.40, S: 2.80

« Reply #3 on: July 01, 2005, 10:53:40 AM »

Richius voices his disapproval of markets. Smiley
Don't be absurd numbnuts.  I firmly believe anyone should be able to buy shares in any company they choose to do so.
Logged
Richard
Richius
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,369


Political Matrix
E: 8.40, S: 2.80

« Reply #4 on: July 01, 2005, 11:38:51 AM »

Richius voices his disapproval of markets. Smiley
Don't be absurd numbnuts.  I firmly believe anyone should be able to buy shares in any company they choose to do so.
Even if nobody wants to sell them any?
Then what?  That is the market.  You certainly don't have a right to buy something if no one wants to sell you something.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.