1) Walker is very likely to win
2) the GOP US Senate candidate (probably Thompson) is likely to win
3) Obama v Romney is hard to call, could break either way.
I don't know. There haven't been any polls out since the video; I think Walker supporters may vote for him anyway, but it will energize the opposition. Thompson winning is likely, sure, but it's doubtful that it will be by more than a few percentage points. Same goes for Obama.
That video didn't say anything. "Divide and Conquer" from Scot Walker means: "be mild and practical"
http://news.yahoo.com/video-walker-explains-divide-conquer-strategy-141616914.html
No, it means go after one group and destroy its capacity for resistance to a right-wing agenda, and then after another so that Wisconsin can become a cheap-labor state with a crippled public sector on behalf of out-of-state interests who bought Scott Walker.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salami_tactics
1) Walker has strengthened the public sector
2) I don't know what will be proposed 5 years from now, so I can't argue your made up hypothetical. I can debate reality if you wish.
3) Diane Hendricks is from Wisconsin, so change that to "In-state-interests" on Walker's side and "out-of-state interests" on the democrats side.
4) He hasn't ever pushed anything on the private sector, so I don't see it anytime soon. Maybe something like re-certifying or opt-out-privileges for workers he would support someday.
