French Legislative elections (post 1945) Survivor - 1986 is the survivor !

[Edu]

1968

[Edu]

1973
2007

[Edu]

Eliminate 2002
Keep 1956

[Edu]

4 for 1993
2 for 2007
1 for 1981

[Edu]

8 for 2007
4 for 1981
2 for 1958
1 for 1967

[Edu]

5 for 1981
3 for 1958
2 for 1967

[Edu]

8 to eliminate 1981

2 to Immunize 1978

[Edu]

5 for 1967
4 for 1946 (Nov)
3 for 1988
2 for 1945
1 for 1951

[Edu]

1967

[Edu]

2 for 1988
1 for 1945

[Edu]

Eliminate
5 for 1988

Keep
5 for 1945

[Edu]

3 for 1951
2 for 1956
1 for 1945

[Edu]

Oh god, a big responsability considering that we are near the end. Hope this works

1 for 1956

[Edu]

19 for 1962

I couldn't resist

[Edu]

I'm not Boycotting this, i must have missed that i didn't vote here

1997

[Edu]

What an honor

Eliminate 1978
1986 for survivor

[Edu]

First of all, I'd like to thank all of you for taking part in this survivor, which was never one of the "big ones" but still had its interests. However, I can't help feeling disturbed by how it has turned in last rounds. I still think I've done my best to make the survivor diverse and somewhat original, but I've made a big mistake on round 11 that caused some tensions in the late period, and ruined the ambiance of our last rounds. I feel sorry it has turned that way.

Now, this is not the first survivor I have done. After starting with a "modest" one about french PS leaders which was very quiet all the time, I ran a pretty thrilling and interesting one with US elections. I'm quite satisfied of both, but of course I'm not the right one to judge.

Recently, I've told Fab that I planned to start a new survivor in next months. It will be a bigger one, and I expect it to gather more people and last for a longer time. But sincerely, I don't want to start a survivor if I'm not able to run it properly. Until recently I thought I had no problem with that, but what happened here made me somewhat doubtful. I'm not Libertas, and I don't want to stubborly spoil good ideas with a new chaotic survivors every day. So if you, who have always been my most "loyal" voters, think the survivor would be better run by someone else, I will have no problem letting him run it. That's what I'd like to ask you now : is it worthwhile ? Please be honest.

I think you are a pretty good manager Antonio , you usually use interesting rules to vote for survivors and i enjoyed the US presidential elections one. As far as i can tell the problem with this survivor was that 1997 got immunity and while it was still immune...It got Immunity again. Apart from that, you have done a great job, patiently waiting for all the lazy regulars like myself to get to vote . And you shouldn't compare yourself to Libertas who regularly bends the rules to allow his favorites to survive.
I can say that i will be voting in whatever else you have in mind so i think you should go ahead with whatever survivor you are planning (just don't let an already immune option to have immunity again and all will be fine )