WinDis Polls - 1: Abortion
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 12:36:20 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  WinDis Polls - 1: Abortion
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7
Poll
Question: What is your position on abortion?
#1
Pro-life
 
#2
Pro-choice
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 58

Author Topic: WinDis Polls - 1: Abortion  (Read 11805 times)
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,125
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #125 on: March 02, 2010, 07:53:28 PM »

Jeez, you guys.  Look, if you don't like abortions, then don't get one.
Logged
SvenssonRS
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,519
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.39, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #126 on: March 02, 2010, 07:57:26 PM »

Jeez, you guys.  Look, if you don't like abortions, then don't get one.

Unfortunately, with Libertas around, things will never be that simple.
Logged
paul718
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,012


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #127 on: March 02, 2010, 08:23:00 PM »


     Besides the point. Many people deny that the fetus should be entitled to the rights of an adult human. From the perspective of an atheist libertarian, there isn't really any sensible reason why they would be.

Why not?  I've never understood why an atheist automatically has to be pro-choice.
Logged
Scam of God
Einzige
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,159
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.19, S: -9.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #128 on: March 02, 2010, 08:31:21 PM »


     Besides the point. Many people deny that the fetus should be entitled to the rights of an adult human. From the perspective of an atheist libertarian, there isn't really any sensible reason why they would be.

Why not?  I've never understood why an atheist automatically has to be pro-choice.

And I've never understood why a libertarian automatically has to be conservative. That's just the way the world works, I suppose.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #129 on: March 02, 2010, 08:33:00 PM »


     Besides the point. Many people deny that the fetus should be entitled to the rights of an adult human. From the perspective of an atheist libertarian, there isn't really any sensible reason why they would be.

Why not?  I've never understood why an atheist automatically has to be pro-choice.

And I've never understood why a libertarian automatically has to be conservative. That's just the way the world works, I suppose.

Uh, what? Who said a libertarian "automatically has to be conservative"? Huh
Logged
Scam of God
Einzige
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,159
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.19, S: -9.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #130 on: March 02, 2010, 08:33:40 PM »


     Besides the point. Many people deny that the fetus should be entitled to the rights of an adult human. From the perspective of an atheist libertarian, there isn't really any sensible reason why they would be.

Why not?  I've never understood why an atheist automatically has to be pro-choice.

And I've never understood why a libertarian automatically has to be conservative. That's just the way the world works, I suppose.

Uh, what? Who said a libertarian "automatically has to be conservative"? Huh

You seem to be trying your damndest to preserve fusionism.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,200
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #131 on: March 02, 2010, 08:43:29 PM »
« Edited: March 02, 2010, 08:45:49 PM by SE Legislator PiT »


     Besides the point. Many people deny that the fetus should be entitled to the rights of an adult human. From the perspective of an atheist libertarian, there isn't really any sensible reason why they would be.

Why not?  I've never understood why an atheist automatically has to be pro-choice.

     You don't automatically have to be anything. I just don't see there being any compelling reason for an atheist to be pro-life, at least from the perspective of a liberties-based world view.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #132 on: March 02, 2010, 08:45:34 PM »


     Besides the point. Many people deny that the fetus should be entitled to the rights of an adult human. From the perspective of an atheist libertarian, there isn't really any sensible reason why they would be.

Why not?  I've never understood why an atheist automatically has to be pro-choice.

     You don't automatically have to be anything. There just isn't any compelling reason for an atheist to be pro-life, at least from the perspective of a liberties-based world view.

Um, it has nothing to do with religion. You either believe in basic human rights, or you don't.
Logged
paul718
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,012


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #133 on: March 02, 2010, 08:49:02 PM »


     Besides the point. Many people deny that the fetus should be entitled to the rights of an adult human. From the perspective of an atheist libertarian, there isn't really any sensible reason why they would be.

Why not?  I've never understood why an atheist automatically has to be pro-choice.

     You don't automatically have to be anything. I just don't see there being any compelling reason for an atheist to be pro-life, at least from the perspective of a liberties-based world view.

I misinterpreted your statement.  Sorry.  Smiley
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,200
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #134 on: March 02, 2010, 09:03:31 PM »


     Besides the point. Many people deny that the fetus should be entitled to the rights of an adult human. From the perspective of an atheist libertarian, there isn't really any sensible reason why they would be.

Why not?  I've never understood why an atheist automatically has to be pro-choice.

     You don't automatically have to be anything. There just isn't any compelling reason for an atheist to be pro-life, at least from the perspective of a liberties-based world view.

Um, it has nothing to do with religion. You either believe in basic human rights, or you don't.

     We've been over this before. I believe in "human rights" because of a specific feature that distinguishes us from animals. It makes sense to me to think of it that way, since there must be some reason that we have rights & animals do not. Now, fetuses do not possess this specific feature...see what I'm getting at?
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #135 on: March 02, 2010, 09:19:35 PM »

Pro-life.


I am surprised that 42% is currently Pro-Life. That is probably higher then the National Average when talking about policy.
Logged
ScottM
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 299


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: 4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #136 on: March 02, 2010, 09:28:49 PM »

Pro-life.


I am surprised that 42% is currently Pro-Life. That is probably higher then the National Average when talking about policy.

Actually, no. Recent Gallup polls have shown that more people identify themselves as pro-life than pro-choice.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #137 on: March 02, 2010, 09:34:09 PM »

Pro-life.


I am surprised that 42% is currently Pro-Life. That is probably higher then the National Average when talking about policy.

Actually, no. Recent Gallup polls have shown that more people identify themselves as pro-life than pro-choice.

Maybe, I haven't really been paying attention to recent polls on issues, just candidates. I do recall polls from like 2005 and 2006 that had Pro-Life in the high 30's and like 50% Pro-Choice. The numbers have definately been going in our direction. Which is a good sign. Its probably one of the few issues were the Generation coming up is more Conservative then their parents, on everything else though, thats a different matter entirely.
Logged
SvenssonRS
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,519
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.39, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #138 on: March 02, 2010, 10:47:06 PM »


I can guarantee he won't.
Logged
Electric Feel
ElectricFeel
Rookie
**
Posts: 212
Mexico


Political Matrix
E: -0.06, S: -5.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #139 on: March 03, 2010, 12:27:43 AM »

I like freedom so pro-choice.
Logged
paul718
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,012


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #140 on: March 03, 2010, 01:01:19 AM »


I like freedom, too, so pro-life.  Wink
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #141 on: March 03, 2010, 01:56:39 AM »


     Besides the point. Many people deny that the fetus should be entitled to the rights of an adult human. From the perspective of an atheist libertarian, there isn't really any sensible reason why they would be.

Why not?  I've never understood why an atheist automatically has to be pro-choice.

     You don't automatically have to be anything. There just isn't any compelling reason for an atheist to be pro-life, at least from the perspective of a liberties-based world view.

Um, it has nothing to do with religion. You either believe in basic human rights, or you don't.

     We've been over this before. I believe in "human rights" because of a specific feature that distinguishes us from animals. It makes sense to me to think of it that way, since there must be some reason that we have rights & animals do not. Now, fetuses do not possess this specific feature...see what I'm getting at?

Yeah, and once again, you want to believe in an arbitrary definition of humanity because it supports your personal agenda. Sorry, but you can't force your beliefs on others.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,200
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #142 on: March 03, 2010, 02:23:58 AM »


     Besides the point. Many people deny that the fetus should be entitled to the rights of an adult human. From the perspective of an atheist libertarian, there isn't really any sensible reason why they would be.

Why not?  I've never understood why an atheist automatically has to be pro-choice.

     You don't automatically have to be anything. There just isn't any compelling reason for an atheist to be pro-life, at least from the perspective of a liberties-based world view.

Um, it has nothing to do with religion. You either believe in basic human rights, or you don't.

     We've been over this before. I believe in "human rights" because of a specific feature that distinguishes us from animals. It makes sense to me to think of it that way, since there must be some reason that we have rights & animals do not. Now, fetuses do not possess this specific feature...see what I'm getting at?

Yeah, and once again, you want to believe in an arbitrary definition of humanity because it supports your personal agenda. Sorry, but you can't force your beliefs on others.

     I don't want to force my beliefs on the issue on anyone. That's why I'm pro-choice. Smiley
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #143 on: March 03, 2010, 02:31:18 AM »


     Besides the point. Many people deny that the fetus should be entitled to the rights of an adult human. From the perspective of an atheist libertarian, there isn't really any sensible reason why they would be.

Why not?  I've never understood why an atheist automatically has to be pro-choice.

     You don't automatically have to be anything. There just isn't any compelling reason for an atheist to be pro-life, at least from the perspective of a liberties-based world view.

Um, it has nothing to do with religion. You either believe in basic human rights, or you don't.

     We've been over this before. I believe in "human rights" because of a specific feature that distinguishes us from animals. It makes sense to me to think of it that way, since there must be some reason that we have rights & animals do not. Now, fetuses do not possess this specific feature...see what I'm getting at?

Yeah, and once again, you want to believe in an arbitrary definition of humanity because it supports your personal agenda. Sorry, but you can't force your beliefs on others.

     I don't want to force my beliefs on the issue on anyone. That's why I'm pro-choice. Smiley

Good, so am I. I fully support a woman's right to choose whether to have sex or not. Smiley
Logged
Countess Anya of the North Parish
cutie_15
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,561
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #144 on: March 03, 2010, 02:41:21 AM »


     Besides the point. Many people deny that the fetus should be entitled to the rights of an adult human. From the perspective of an atheist libertarian, there isn't really any sensible reason why they would be.

Why not?  I've never understood why an atheist automatically has to be pro-choice.

     You don't automatically have to be anything. There just isn't any compelling reason for an atheist to be pro-life, at least from the perspective of a liberties-based world view.

Um, it has nothing to do with religion. You either believe in basic human rights, or you don't.

     We've been over this before. I believe in "human rights" because of a specific feature that distinguishes us from animals. It makes sense to me to think of it that way, since there must be some reason that we have rights & animals do not. Now, fetuses do not possess this specific feature...see what I'm getting at?

Yeah, and once again, you want to believe in an arbitrary definition of humanity because it supports your personal agenda. Sorry, but you can't force your beliefs on others.

     I don't want to force my beliefs on the issue on anyone. That's why I'm pro-choice. Smiley
good ownage there. Wink
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,713
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #145 on: March 03, 2010, 02:41:38 AM »


     Besides the point. Many people deny that the fetus should be entitled to the rights of an adult human. From the perspective of an atheist libertarian, there isn't really any sensible reason why they would be.

Why not?  I've never understood why an atheist automatically has to be pro-choice.

     You don't automatically have to be anything. There just isn't any compelling reason for an atheist to be pro-life, at least from the perspective of a liberties-based world view.

Um, it has nothing to do with religion. You either believe in basic human rights, or you don't.

     We've been over this before. I believe in "human rights" because of a specific feature that distinguishes us from animals. It makes sense to me to think of it that way, since there must be some reason that we have rights & animals do not. Now, fetuses do not possess this specific feature...see what I'm getting at?
                                                              what specific feature? We are talking about a development here of a being that is already human even if there is not as much intelligence or what have you. isn't it at least only a matter of degree rather than a difference in kind?
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #146 on: March 03, 2010, 02:42:28 AM »


     Besides the point. Many people deny that the fetus should be entitled to the rights of an adult human. From the perspective of an atheist libertarian, there isn't really any sensible reason why they would be.

Why not?  I've never understood why an atheist automatically has to be pro-choice.

     You don't automatically have to be anything. There just isn't any compelling reason for an atheist to be pro-life, at least from the perspective of a liberties-based world view.

Um, it has nothing to do with religion. You either believe in basic human rights, or you don't.

     We've been over this before. I believe in "human rights" because of a specific feature that distinguishes us from animals. It makes sense to me to think of it that way, since there must be some reason that we have rights & animals do not. Now, fetuses do not possess this specific feature...see what I'm getting at?

Yeah, and once again, you want to believe in an arbitrary definition of humanity because it supports your personal agenda. Sorry, but you can't force your beliefs on others.

     I don't want to force my beliefs on the issue on anyone. That's why I'm pro-choice. Smiley
good ownage there. Wink

Yeah, PiT was owned pretty badly. I'm glad you are here to comfort him.
Logged
Countess Anya of the North Parish
cutie_15
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,561
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #147 on: March 03, 2010, 02:44:45 AM »


     Besides the point. Many people deny that the fetus should be entitled to the rights of an adult human. From the perspective of an atheist libertarian, there isn't really any sensible reason why they would be.

Why not?  I've never understood why an atheist automatically has to be pro-choice.

     You don't automatically have to be anything. There just isn't any compelling reason for an atheist to be pro-life, at least from the perspective of a liberties-based world view.

Um, it has nothing to do with religion. You either believe in basic human rights, or you don't.

     We've been over this before. I believe in "human rights" because of a specific feature that distinguishes us from animals. It makes sense to me to think of it that way, since there must be some reason that we have rights & animals do not. Now, fetuses do not possess this specific feature...see what I'm getting at?

Yeah, and once again, you want to believe in an arbitrary definition of humanity because it supports your personal agenda. Sorry, but you can't force your beliefs on others.

     I don't want to force my beliefs on the issue on anyone. That's why I'm pro-choice. Smiley
good ownage there. Wink

Yeah, PiT was owned pretty badly. I'm glad you are here to comfort him.
oh please. he got you there. If you can't admit that then you take this stuff to seriously. Everyone gets burned once in a while. It just happen to be you this time libertas.
Logged
Electric Feel
ElectricFeel
Rookie
**
Posts: 212
Mexico


Political Matrix
E: -0.06, S: -5.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #148 on: March 03, 2010, 02:45:32 AM »

Please, guys, this argument never goes anywhere. NEVER.

Please stop.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #149 on: March 03, 2010, 02:47:19 AM »


     Besides the point. Many people deny that the fetus should be entitled to the rights of an adult human. From the perspective of an atheist libertarian, there isn't really any sensible reason why they would be.

Why not?  I've never understood why an atheist automatically has to be pro-choice.

     You don't automatically have to be anything. There just isn't any compelling reason for an atheist to be pro-life, at least from the perspective of a liberties-based world view.

Um, it has nothing to do with religion. You either believe in basic human rights, or you don't.

     We've been over this before. I believe in "human rights" because of a specific feature that distinguishes us from animals. It makes sense to me to think of it that way, since there must be some reason that we have rights & animals do not. Now, fetuses do not possess this specific feature...see what I'm getting at?

Yeah, and once again, you want to believe in an arbitrary definition of humanity because it supports your personal agenda. Sorry, but you can't force your beliefs on others.

     I don't want to force my beliefs on the issue on anyone. That's why I'm pro-choice. Smiley
good ownage there. Wink

Yeah, PiT was owned pretty badly. I'm glad you are here to comfort him.
oh please. he got you there. If you can't admit that then you take this stuff to seriously. Everyone gets burned once in a while. It just happen to be you this time libertas.

Except I didn't get "burned". Learn how to follow a conversation please.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.065 seconds with 11 queries.