Which is the weirder assumption out of these options? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2024, 04:24:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Which is the weirder assumption out of these options? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Seriously
#1
Going without politics for a week would be a horrible challenge
 
#2
Eating vegan food for a week would be a horrible challenge.
 
#3
They are both equally bizarre assumptions. Neither is an unpleasant option.
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 68

Author Topic: Which is the weirder assumption out of these options?  (Read 1442 times)
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,641
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

« on: August 18, 2014, 04:54:35 PM »

Option 1.

I mean, I wouldn't find a vegan week some horrible challenge, but I can see that if you were used to a certain style of diet, it could be hard to think what would make a full, satisfying meal. But the idea of "politics" as some necessary sustenance is bizarre.

This (normal)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 14 queries.