The amount of non-military families that possess automatic weaponry is extraordinarily low.
Yes. What does that have to do with this topic though?
Nothing aside from the fact that automatic weaponry is a better term than "assault weapons" for this sort of topic. Maybe I should've clarified my statement: Any semi-automatic modification of an automatic weapon OR automatic weapon.
How is it's origins relevant? Isn't that sort of like classifying Coca-Cola as a narcotic since it used to have cocaine? Or advising an alcoholic not to drink Welch's grape juice?
Are there any real arguments as to how an AR-15 is more dangerous than the guns that people would use instead if it were banned?