Einzige has been banned

[Sewer]

Ein-zian.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Again, who's Einzige?

A German libertarian who hung around this Forum.

Einzige was neither German nor a libertarian.

He was libertarian IMO. A Mechaman-style Libertarian.

He wasn't really a libertarian. He was an Obama-supporting Democrat with an inconsistent ideology.

[Psychic Octopus]

Again, who's Einzige?

A German libertarian who hung around this Forum.

Einzige was neither German nor a libertarian.

He was libertarian IMO. A Mechaman-style Libertarian.

He wasn't really a libertarian. He was an Obama-supporting Democrat with an inconsistent ideology.

Lol, he is a libertarian who would've voted for TR. Humorous to the max.

[Associate Justice PiT]

Again, who's Einzige?

A German libertarian who hung around this Forum.

Einzige was neither German nor a libertarian.

He was libertarian IMO. A Mechaman-style Libertarian.

He wasn't really a libertarian. He was an Obama-supporting Democrat with an inconsistent ideology.

Lol, he is a libertarian who would've voted for TR. Humorous to the max.

     Really? Did he say why he would do that?

[Earth]

He wasn't really a libertarian.

Haha.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

He wasn't really a libertarian.

Haha.

Uh, he wasn't.

Why are you so personally invested in this in whitewashing Einzige's legacy. Were you his boyfriend or something?

[#CriminalizeSobriety]

Again, who's Einzige?

A German libertarian who hung around this Forum.

Einzige was neither German nor a libertarian.

He was libertarian IMO. A Mechaman-style Libertarian.

He wasn't really a libertarian. He was an Obama-supporting Democrat with an inconsistent ideology.

Lol, he is a libertarian who would've voted for TR. Humorous to the max.

     Really? Did he say why he would do that?

1912: Theodore Roosevelt

Made shortly before his banning, so I suppose we'll never know why, though he cited, in the past, his support as a "lesser of ____" evils (though I'd presume Taft was the least of 3 evils.)

[#CriminalizeSobriety]

Hamilton now should declare himself President of Atlasia in exile and form government from fellow banned troll and, finally, become An Untimate Joke.

He doesn't need to; his trolls and socks already basically control the Northeast.

[Joe Republic]

He wasn't really a libertarian. He was an Obama-supporting Democrat with an inconsistent ideology.

...says the "anarchist" who supports Republican candidates.  (I guess I'll let your current username slide.)

[Associate Justice PiT]

Again, who's Einzige?

A German libertarian who hung around this Forum.

Einzige was neither German nor a libertarian.

He was libertarian IMO. A Mechaman-style Libertarian.

He wasn't really a libertarian. He was an Obama-supporting Democrat with an inconsistent ideology.

Lol, he is a libertarian who would've voted for TR. Humorous to the max.

     Really? Did he say why he would do that?

1912: Theodore Roosevelt

Made shortly before his banning, so I suppose we'll never know why, though he cited, in the past, his support as a "lesser of ____" evils (though I'd presume Taft was the least of 3 evils.)

     Taft was also less likely to win than Roosevelt (not that either had a chance). Still, I find the notion of voting for the "lesser evil" quite repellant. If you have to resort to that line, you know that the person you are voting for is quite terrible.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

He wasn't really a libertarian. He was an Obama-supporting Democrat with an inconsistent ideology.

...says the "anarchist" who supports Republican candidates.  (I guess I'll let your current username slide.)

My ideology is consistent. Give it up, Joe.

[Joe Republic]

Wow, I'm convinced. 


(And since people always need to say so for you, that was sarcasm.)

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Wow, I'm convinced. 


(And since people always need to say so for you, that was sarcasm.)

[Sewer]

Libertas, you need to say how an anarchist can support Republican candidates.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Libertas, you need to say how an anarchist can support Republican candidates.

I support candidates that I believe will improve my country. I don't support Republicans or Democrats, just good principled people.

[Joe Republic]

... which shows, once again, that you have a very limited understanding of what anarchism actually means.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

... which shows, once again, that you have a very limited understanding of what anarchism actually means.

No, it shows once again how intellectually shallow you are.

[justW353]

Libertas, you need to say how an anarchist can support Republican candidates.

I support candidates that I believe will improve my country. I don't support Republicans or Democrats, just good principled people.

...

What?  So, you want to improve a country you don't believe should exist?  I'm really not following you here, but true anarchism believes in a state-less society...which once again begs the question why would you support Republican candidates?

I'm not even going to address the impracticality or evil of anarchy.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Libertas, you need to say how an anarchist can support Republican candidates.

I support candidates that I believe will improve my country. I don't support Republicans or Democrats, just good principled people.

...

What?  So, you want to improve a country you don't believe should exist?  I'm really not following you here, but true anarchism believes in a state-less society...which once again begs the question why would you support Republican candidates?

I'm not even going to address the impracticality or evil of anarchy.

Changes need to be made incrementally to weaken the federal government, decentralize power, and maximize individual liberty. There is no disconnect here, so please don't let Joe convince you that there is.

[justW353]

Libertas, you need to say how an anarchist can support Republican candidates.

I support candidates that I believe will improve my country. I don't support Republicans or Democrats, just good principled people.

...

What?  So, you want to improve a country you don't believe should exist?  I'm really not following you here, but true anarchism believes in a state-less society...which once again begs the question why would you support Republican candidates?

I'm not even going to address the impracticality or evil of anarchy.

Changes need to be made incrementally to weaken the federal government, decentralize power, and maximize individual liberty. There is no disconnect here, so please don't let Joe convince you that there is.

So you are an anti-federalist.  I find little relation between say...paleoconservatism and anarchism. 

You can't just call yourself an anarchist if you favor "small government".  An anarchist favors "no government".  That is a pretty huge disconnect.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Libertas, you need to say how an anarchist can support Republican candidates.

I support candidates that I believe will improve my country. I don't support Republicans or Democrats, just good principled people.

...

What?  So, you want to improve a country you don't believe should exist?  I'm really not following you here, but true anarchism believes in a state-less society...which once again begs the question why would you support Republican candidates?

I'm not even going to address the impracticality or evil of anarchy.

Changes need to be made incrementally to weaken the federal government, decentralize power, and maximize individual liberty. There is no disconnect here, so please don't let Joe convince you that there is.

So you are an anti-federalist.  I find little relation between say...paleoconservatism and anarchism. 

You can't just call yourself an anarchist if you favor "small government".  An anarchist favors "no government".  That is a pretty huge disconnect.

Um, no. Please stop misrepresenting my positions.

[justW353]

Libertas, you need to say how an anarchist can support Republican candidates.

I support candidates that I believe will improve my country. I don't support Republicans or Democrats, just good principled people.

...

What?  So, you want to improve a country you don't believe should exist?  I'm really not following you here, but true anarchism believes in a state-less society...which once again begs the question why would you support Republican candidates?

I'm not even going to address the impracticality or evil of anarchy.

Changes need to be made incrementally to weaken the federal government, decentralize power, and maximize individual liberty. There is no disconnect here, so please don't let Joe convince you that there is.

So you are an anti-federalist.  I find little relation between say...paleoconservatism and anarchism. 

You can't just call yourself an anarchist if you favor "small government".  An anarchist favors "no government".  That is a pretty huge disconnect.

Um, no. Please stop misrepresenting my positions.

haha, alright.  I'm simply stating that you oppose the Federal government, which would (in theory I suppose) make you an anti-Federalist...

[phk]

Libertas, you need to say how an anarchist can support Republican candidates.

I support candidates that I believe will improve my country. I don't support Republicans or Democrats, just good principled people.

...

What?  So, you want to improve a country you don't believe should exist?  I'm really not following you here, but true anarchism believes in a state-less society...which once again begs the question why would you support Republican candidates?

I'm not even going to address the impracticality or evil of anarchy.

Changes need to be made incrementally to weaken the federal government, decentralize power, and maximize individual liberty. There is no disconnect here, so please don't let Joe convince you that there is.

So you are an anti-federalist.  I find little relation between say...paleoconservatism and anarchism. 

You can't just call yourself an anarchist if you favor "small government".  An anarchist favors "no government".  That is a pretty huge disconnect.

Um, no. Please stop misrepresenting my positions.

haha, alright.  I'm simply stating that you oppose the Federal government, which would (in theory I suppose) make you an anti-Federalist...

Are you a Christian?

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Libertas, you need to say how an anarchist can support Republican candidates.

I support candidates that I believe will improve my country. I don't support Republicans or Democrats, just good principled people.

...

What?  So, you want to improve a country you don't believe should exist?  I'm really not following you here, but true anarchism believes in a state-less society...which once again begs the question why would you support Republican candidates?

I'm not even going to address the impracticality or evil of anarchy.

Changes need to be made incrementally to weaken the federal government, decentralize power, and maximize individual liberty. There is no disconnect here, so please don't let Joe convince you that there is.

So you are an anti-federalist.  I find little relation between say...paleoconservatism and anarchism. 

You can't just call yourself an anarchist if you favor "small government".  An anarchist favors "no government".  That is a pretty huge disconnect.

Um, no. Please stop misrepresenting my positions.

haha, alright.  I'm simply stating that you oppose the Federal government, which would (in theory I suppose) make you an anti-Federalist...

I favor decentralization in all things, so certainly I oppose the existence of the federal government.

[Bo]

If you're banned, how long is it for?