yes, there probably are at least tens of thousands of people like that. so?
OK, here's my point:
1. A more extreme ideological candidate will hurt the Dems no matter what.
2. A Fraternal Order of Police endorsement can shift margins in a close race.
3. Many people with families/relatives in law enforcement will be indirectly swayed by this.
Look, my point is that these small factors can be enough to tip a close race in crucial swing states. That's all. I'm not saying De Blasio would get only 125 EVs or something, just that he would lose winnable states in part due to his loss of police support.
It's also not just police officers voting against him that would hurt.
The police are relatively popular. It would be catastrophic for Democrats if support for the police becomes a partisan issue.
De Blasio is NOT a mainstream Democrat.
he managed the sitting Democratic president's wife's Senate campaign in 2000. it doesn't get much more "mainstream" than that.
Michelle Obama ran for senate in 2000?
In 2000, Bill Clinton was the sitting President.
De Blasio has plenty of elements in his record that suggest he has more of a liberal activist background than most presidential contenders. He backed Dinkins for mayor (Keep in mind Dinkins won a close race and lost a close race in New York City) and managed Charles Rangel's campaign as well.