It's pretty laughable that Wulfric prefers Blunt to Kander because Kander is "too partisan". Don't get me wrong, Kander will probably be a pretty standard Democrat in the Senate but because of the state he'll represent, he'll at least have to pay some lip service to "moderate types" (whatever that means nowadays), which I'd think that someone like Wulfric would love. Blunt, on the other hand, is the definition of a partisan hack bought out by special interests; how can you say "VOTE OUT ALL CONGRESSIONAL LEADERS" and still back an ex-Minority Whip? That doesn't even make sense.
A Hillary Clinton national campaign chairman (yes, Kander is literally that) that has little to no actual policy differences with her aside from the Iran Deal is not a moderate in any sense of the word. Plus, he does his current job poorly, why promote him?
That's an interesting theory coming from someone living in Minnesota.
