I supported Clark and he could've won, as could've Edwards. Though Kerry is unfairly attacked too much, he didn't do that horrible when all is said and done, not even Dukakis-level much less Mondale or McGovern, and could've won if he responded better.
Clark was my second choice after Dean but let's face it, the man had no political skill whatsoever.
Not completely true. His debate performances, for example, improved immensely over the course of the campaign. Had he started in early, rather than fall, 2003, he would have performed much better.
