Recent Posts
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 20, 2024, 06:35:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Filter Options Collapse
        


Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10

 1 
 on: Today at 06:34:40 PM 
Started by KaiserDave - Last post by Steve from Lambeth
Mayor Weinberger also not running. Philslide inbound.
I am now imagining Phil Scott physically gliding down an actual playground slide

 2 
 on: Today at 06:33:55 PM 
Started by GAinDC - Last post by GAinDC
I guess we're really embracing a broad definition of what constitutes "US general discussion"

Target is a major nationwide retailer….

 3 
 on: Today at 06:32:42 PM 
Started by PeteB - Last post by PeteB
I am putting this topic here, as the movie was apparently bankrolled by Trump donor Dan Snyder, in order to help Trump in the election.  Instead, it shows him in a buffoonish light and includes a scene which uses Ivana's original claim (since retracted) that he raped her.

The Apprentice will be shown at the Cannes film festival - no idea when it will be released in the US.

https://www.theguardian.com/film/article/2024/may/20/donald-trump-biopic-the-apprentice-ali-abbasi-cannes

 4 
 on: Today at 06:28:46 PM 
Started by OSR stands with Israel - Last post by pppolitics
I am not surprised.

Biden isn't very smart.

If he is, he would have used this opportunity to wash his hands of Netanyahu.

 5 
 on: Today at 06:25:34 PM 
Started by Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers - Last post by Minnesota Mike
2024 Washington Governor Race:

Bob Ferguson (D) 35% (+7)
Dave Reichert (R) 28%
Semi Bird (R) 11%
Mark Mullet (D) 4%
.
Head-2-Head:
Bob Ferguson (D) 48% (+6)
Dave Reichert (R) 42%

.@ppppolls/
@nwprogressive
 (D), 615 LV, 5/15-16

 6 
 on: Today at 06:24:35 PM 
Started by Tekken_Guy - Last post by Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
No they won't

 7 
 on: Today at 06:24:13 PM 
Started by 2016 - Last post by Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
IAN helped Vance and Johnson and Budd tremendously they were endangered before IAN and the Rs held onto the H due to NY due to Zeldin overperform

 8 
 on: Today at 06:23:32 PM 
Started by GAinDC - Last post by HisGrace
I guess we're really embracing a broad definition of what constitutes "US general discussion"

 9 
 on: Today at 06:19:35 PM 
Started by Obama24 - Last post by HisGrace
Crimea+Donetsk+Luhansk going to Russia and Ukraine joining NATO (or some other defensive agreement that has teeth to ensure this doesn't happen again) is the absolute floor. Ideally of course, Russia leaving entirely and Ukraine joining NATO, but that seems unlikely.

One of the few serious posts here and about what I would say.

Good lord Putin got under you guys's skin with the election interference stuff which is about the only reason I can think of why you're being so intense about this. You wuss out in Afghanistan, want Israel to roll over and just let Hamas take over their country, but then you don't want Ukraine to give up one foot of land even if it means WWII casualties. Some of you are even talking about regime change in Russia which presumably means starting WWIII and invading and hoping it goes better than all the other times in history that's been tried.

As I've said before if this is what it looks like when you're on someone's side in a war than you clearly weren't on the US's side against the Taliban in Afghanistan.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bucha_massacre Now kindly go shove it

Well the Taliban committed all kinds of atrocities against civilians and it took significantly less loss of life to stop them than it would for the kind of total victory against Russia that all of you seem to want here. Yet most of you were fine letting them take over Afghanistan, it's not logical so have those two positions in concert, there's just some kind of emotional bias here.
Or Afghanistan was a 20 year, several thousand US troops died, trillion dollar project that ended up being in vain as the local population didn’t care if the Taliban was in charge or not vs Ukraine a 3 year war, no U.S. troop death project for a country that actually wants to fight the enemy. But why worry about details when you can do a fake virtual signal like a douche

Well a hell of a lot more than "several thousand people" have gotten killed here and Russia's certainly not worse than the Taliban, so the moral calculus doesn't make any sense. If anything you could argue the other way around: taking relatively light casualties to stop the Taliban in Afghanistan would be worth it but with hundreds of thousands getting killed in Ukraine the war needs to end as quickly as possible to stop loss of life on that scale even if it means a non optimum outcome. Or you could support both or be opposed to both, but not do what you guys are doing.

The rhetoric is just so much tougher here from the left than for any other armed conflict I can think of, usually you just want to roll over and let the aggressor push everyone around because you're so afraid of war.  We have a guy arguing on the second page that the US should be willing to get nuked for Ukraine. So a few thousand soldiers dying to stop the Taliban is too much but hundreds of thousands or even millions dying for Ukraine is ok.

 10 
 on: Today at 06:18:59 PM 
Started by Sestak - Last post by
Day 1/3 down for quals and it's not looking good.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 12 queries.