Sam, quick question. Is there a difference between a poll and a tracking poll?
According to Lowry, Steele's internals have him down 8% today.
Yesterday:
Today:
Polls and tracking polls are essentially the same. With a poll, you do one two-three day sample of a certain number of people and it ends, you release the results.
In a tracking poll, you do a sample of say 500 likely voters on Friday, then the same on Saturday and Sunday. Then, you sample 500 likely voters on Monday and drop the Friday sample. Repeat and rinse. It's akin to what Rasmussen does on the Bush approval numbers and is thought to be better because you can catch day-to-day trends. Of course, you get outliers sometimes.
Look, with SUSA polling, it's obvious that they're either off or they're catching something we're missing. The easiest thing is to believe they're off, but the Governor's results they have been pulling with the same samples (here it is O'Malley +1) are along the lines of the other polls. I have sort of become convinced that the difference in numbers has to do with the way they ask the horse race question, with the addition of the lines, "if you were in the voting booth right now".
It comes down to this: do you believe there's going to be a sizable portion of the population (black) who's going to lie to pollsters until they're "in the voting booth", and then pull the Republican lever for Senate? If you do, then this race is a pure toss-up. If not, then it's a five-six point lead. That's the reason why I call this the most difficult race to predict right now.
One other thing: About these public pronouncements of internals from inside sources, "Do Not Believe Them!" In some races, these people will lie too liberally, in others they will lie too conservatively, in others they will simply just lie. I cannot get this point across enough; we will have so much of this in the next few days, it's quite easy to let it all get to you and cloud your thinking.