Three Strikes Laws (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2024, 03:40:25 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Three Strikes Laws (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
support
 
#2
oppose
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 18

Author Topic: Three Strikes Laws  (Read 2990 times)
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


« on: September 03, 2005, 07:42:58 AM »

Oppose. Have a points system, with low-level crimes worth one point and high-level crimes worth up to 10 points. 10 points and you go to jail, but judicial discretion should be in place for sentencing.

That seems reasonably fair to me, much moreso then 'three strikes'.

BTW dazz, in many states juries have sentencing jurisdiction; for example in Indiana juries determine in murder cases if the death penalty should take effect.
Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


« Reply #1 on: September 03, 2005, 08:19:10 PM »

well, in the trial have victim impact statements, or during sentencing proceedings. I support them; I think they're aq good idea; but in our criminal justice system, perhaps unlike America's, our focus is on ensuring the right punishment is given to each individual-NO numerical sentencing, NO automatic jail, and no consideration of prior convictions in trial (pre-sentencing). Sure, some people get sentences that are too short, but I think that is a lot better then sentences that are too long.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 14 queries.