TRUMP slays Clinton's record in new ad, vows to defends women's lib

[ProudModerate2]

I'm just glad that whoever wins the general, be it Clinton or Trump, they'll have run on an explicitly pro-feminist platform! What progress! Remember, just four years ago, Mitt Romney officially declared war on women. And now we have proud feminist Donald Trump! Wow!

Lief,
You are fooling no one.
Your "playing-dumb" wording in your comment does not make Trump pro-feminist.
Trump is worse than Romney regarding his record for women's rights.

Actually if anything, Trump is anti-women.
Trump has done nothing but insulted, belittled, sexualized and stereotyped women. He has insulted notable women like Sarah Jessica Parker, Rosie O'Donnell, Cher, Bette Midler, Fox News' Megyn Kelly during the debate and now Hillary. He has used words like ‘fat pigs’, ‘dogs’, ‘slobs’, and ‘disgusting animals,” to describe women in the past.

Trump obviously has a problem viewing women as "leaders" in business or government.
This is proven by his degrading words about Hillary using the bathroom during a debate (of all things!), his use of words "got schlonged" towards Hillary, and his comment towards Fiorina during the debate "Look at that face! Would anyone vote for that? Can you imagine that, the face of our next president." The list goes on, and on, and on ...

"Trump is Disgusting," is appropriate now, as it also was when it was spelled out via skywriting during the New Year's Rose Parade.

[ProudModerate2]

I'm just glad that whoever wins the general, be it Clinton or Trump, they'll have run on an explicitly pro-feminist platform! What progress! Remember, just four years ago, Mitt Romney officially declared war on women. And now we have proud feminist Donald Trump! Wow!

Are you being sarcastic? Because I can't tell.

Not sure myself.
It's just that Fox News brain-washing has done wonders to some Americans (and Atlas members).
You should have seen the "seriousness" of some Atlas members right before election night in 2012.
They seriously thought Romney was going to win by a landslide, due to many Fox News "senior" analysts which zombified them to believe it was going to take place. Completely going against almost every polling data available !
It was shocking .... but admit after the election, it was hilarious to see them squirm and hide in shame.

[ProudModerate2]

Criticizing women, especially biased hacks like Megyn Kelly, does not make you a sexist. Trump is critical of many people; there's no evidence he's focused his ire on women.

Lief,
Face the truth .... Trump is a sexist pig !

[ProudModerate2]

and his comment towards Fiorina during the debate "Look at that face! Would anyone vote for that? Can you imagine that, the face of our next president."

That wasn't during the debate.

You are right ... I think that was said during a Rolling Stone interview/article.
Trump has said so many disgusting things about so many groups of people, it's hard not to get one confused with another.

[ProudModerate2]

As seen over New Year's Day Rose Parade in Pasadena, California.
Skywriting spells out "TRUMP IS DISGUSTING" ....

[ProudModerate2]

and his comment towards Fiorina during the debate "Look at that face! Would anyone vote for that? Can you imagine that, the face of our next president."

That wasn't during the debate.

You are right ... I think that was said during a Rolling Stone interview/article.
Trump has said so many disgusting things about so many groups of people, it's hard not to get one confused with another.

It's not disgusting. It's just telling it like it is.
You are, obviously, completely PC brainwashed to understand that.

What does someone's facial appearance have anything to do with being President ?
Absolutely nothing of course.
Should a candidate have a specific "appearance" to be President ?
It seems to that bigot Trump, the Prez should be white and male ... I guess. What ever he (and his supporters) think, this is wrong and a degrading comment. (PS: I don't support Fiorina's bid for Prez, but will defend any candidate for attacks he/she may receive "because of appearance.")

Similar as if Trump would have said about Obama in 2008, "Look at his skin ? Would anyone vote for that? Can you imagine that ... that black skin (man) as our next president."
I have no doubts Trump would actually believe in something like this. And from the comments I read on Atlas, I have no doubt many of his supporters would harness that same bigotry within them (though they would never admit it openly in a forum).

You are, obviously, completely Fox-News brainwashed to understand that.

[ProudModerate2]

We are all boycotting Fox News for their anti Trump agenda yet you keep saying that.

Yes, maybe so.
But apparently that same "Fox News brainwashing" wacky effect, that took place 4 years ago, still lingers today, deep inside the minds of (now) Trump supporters.

[ProudModerate2]

Four things, just to set the record straight:

1) "Look at that face" was all about her persona and not about her physical appearance. He repeated that with Hillary ("Can you imagine having that as President?")
2) TRUMP loves women. He has a great relationship with women. And the women love TRUMP. He cares about the women's health issues and their equality rights, particularly workplace equality, unlike Clinton, as evidenced by the ad in the OP.
3) TRUMP would never attack anybody based on his ethnicity or color of his skin. When have you heard TRUMP doing that? And, by the way, he loves the blacks. He has a great relationship with the blacks. And the black love TRUMP too.
4) I don't watch FOX News. For the record, my primary source of news is CNN. I am immune to propaganda and brainwashing techniques, so to say.

If you just replace "He" and "TRUMP" with "I", then I could easily see myself mistaking your post for an actual Trump quote (minus the grammatical errors of course)

LMAO.
Yes you are right Virginia. It all sounds like Trump talking in that post. It's just a bunch of one-liners and talking points, that Trump Yes-Men have been trained to use.
Trump even has his zombie supporters believing that if you talk about someone's facial appearance, well that really means that you are talking about their "persona" ........ pfffffffff. Give me a break !