MW: The WAMSR Creation Bill (Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 10:17:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  MW: The WAMSR Creation Bill (Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MW: The WAMSR Creation Bill (Passed)  (Read 1868 times)
LeBron
LeBron FitzGerald
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,906
United States


« on: September 17, 2014, 06:07:01 PM »

When it comes to energy efficiency, I like to look for more cost effective and safer ways to address the issue especially solar energy panels.

So I'm not a huge fan of nuclear power plants either, and I would prefer to see an added clause to forbade the construction of any new nuclear power plants, but I like the intent of this bill to better stop nuclear waste from building up. Just the cost is kind of unsettling with nuclear energy becoming a thing of the past. I'm just not sure we that many new reactors.
Logged
LeBron
LeBron FitzGerald
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,906
United States


« Reply #1 on: September 18, 2014, 09:38:50 PM »

When it comes to energy efficiency, I like to look for more cost effective and safer ways to address the issue especially solar energy panels.

So I'm not a huge fan of nuclear power plants either, and I would prefer to see an added clause to forbade the construction of any new nuclear power plants, but I like the intent of this bill to better stop nuclear waste from building up. Just the cost is kind of unsettling with nuclear energy becoming a thing of the past. I'm just not sure we that many new reactors.
I agree that solar is the way to go, however, having a diversified energy sector which includes much safer Nuclear Reactors is the way to go. I am not a fan of banning all future construction of Nuclear Plants, but we can add language making it so only WAMS Reactors are allowed?
I would be okay with that, and the amendment's friendly!
Logged
LeBron
LeBron FitzGerald
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,906
United States


« Reply #2 on: September 23, 2014, 10:09:53 PM »

That's actually a really good revision. I would have never thought to do that, honestly. The original bill only covers CO, SD, MN and IA, but neglects ND and other states that have very serious problems with toxic waste evisceration. I support the amendment.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.