Talk Elections

Forum Community => Election and History Games => Topic started by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 27, 2010, 09:30:36 PM



Title: PEI Game
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 27, 2010, 09:30:36 PM
This is a combo of an idea I had for "the island" game, and a combo of my canadian political sim idea.

This is not some rough combo idea, in fact, this is a very old idea from back when I used to live on PEI and back before I had friends on the internet :P It was a game I'd play with myself. Since it fits in between these two ideas (which are also games I used to play with myself during that time) I think that it might be more successful.

First of all, get to know this map:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f8/PrinceEdwardIsland_map_1874.jpg
And this map:
http://atlanticportal.hil.unb.ca/acva/macdonald/images/gallery/zoom/pei_map.jpg

This is the island you will be playing on.
It is a real place: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Edward_Island


Here is a rail map I made: http://maps.google.ca/maps/ms?hl=en&geocode=&ie=UTF8&vps=1&jsv=289a&oe=UTF8&msa=0&msid=101714683938336514556.00049383c750da072fcdb

I will put this on the "game" map in a bit.


As for the "story" in short:

A number of people have been thrown back in time (or at least that is what you guys can figure) to PEI before it was developed. But, there is no one around, except you people of course.

You have been chosen as a leader of a Parish (or a group of Parishes) and as such, you sit on the Island wide council.

More to come! Sign up below!!




This is the game map: http://www.ridingbyriding.ca/AMSTAR/pei_map.gif

Note each Parish has a Capitol City (square dot)

This is a smaller reference map:
()


TABLE OF CONTENTS


Price Samples, Spring of year 1
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=126923.msg2701448#msg2701448

Lot Concerns, Spring of year 1
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=126923.msg2700679#msg2700679

Rail Travel Times:
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=126923.msg2700620#msg2700620

Spring Budget, year 1:
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=126923.msg2700609#msg2700609

Parliament
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=126923.msg2700520#msg2700520

Currency Info:
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=126923.msg2700234#msg2700234


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 27, 2010, 09:30:57 PM
JUMP TO PAGE 21


You may also pick one of these titles:

prefect
captain
commander
comptroller
magistrate
chair
(super)intendent
manager
chief
reeve
sheriff
provost
mayor
warden
dean
chancellor
director
(grand)archon
lord
(arch)duke
(vis)count
bishop


HOWEVER... only one person per title!!! So pick your favourite fast!

You will then be the ___ of that Parish.

IE the Chief of the Halifax Parish or the Director of the East Parish etc.


You may also submit your own for approval, but it should ideally be something in the vein of the above.

BANNED TITLES!

King, or anything like Emperor, Sultan etc.
I am King :P

President, Prime Minister, Governor etc.
We will elect that :P



NORTH - Anne, Countess
EGMONT - Temporarily Off Limits
HALIFAX - Zero, The Director
RICHMOND - oakvale, dean
ST. DAVID - Swedish Cheese, The Bishop
PRINCETON - Temporarily Off Limits
GRENVILLE - homelycooking, Provost
HILLSBOROUGH - Sewer, Duke
CHARLOTTE - Temporarily Off Limits
CHARLOTTETOWN - Bacon King, Mayor
BEDFORD - Vazdul, Chancellor
ST. JOHN - Libertas, Archon
ST. PATRICK - Barnes, Lord
ST. GEORGE - Temporarily Off Limits
ST. ANDREW - N!K, magistrate
GEORGETOWN - Temporarily Off Limits
EAST - RosettaStoned, Warden

Pronouncation tips:

Crapaud - "Crap O"
Gaspereaux - "Gasp Er O"
Montague - "Mont ah Q"
Souris - "SueRee"


TOO LATE!?

Each parish can have a deputy! You can apply to play and wait until someone accepts you, or, if you are smart, you will PM someone you already know who is playing and ask to be their deputy!

This will also help in the instance when someone goes AWOL, their parish will not fall into disorder.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 27, 2010, 09:31:20 PM
FULL CENSUS

IN EACH PARISH
saw mills   3    +/- 1
tanneries   1   
grist mills   2   
churches   4    +/- 1
schoolhouses   3    +/- 1
cooper stations   1   
boats   12    +/- 3
IN EACH RURAL PARISH (IE, Not Charlottetown)
horse   175    +/- 25
cattle   450    +/- 50
hogs   325    +/- 35
sheep   950    +/- 90
   
There is a Distillery in Charlottetown, and there are specialized mills in each of the three county seats.   

         
lot   1   -   672   -   2   
lot   2   -   307   -   1   
lot   3   -   216   -   1   
NORTH PARISH      -   1195   -   -   4
   Tignish   -   314         
                  
                  
lot   4   -   447   -   2   
lot   5   -   154   -   1   
lot   6   -   421   -   2   
lot   7   -   132   -   1   
EGMONT PARISH      -   1154   -   -   6
   Albeton   -   192         
   O'Leary   -   172         
                  
lot   8   -   159   -   1   
lot   9   -   190   -   1   
lot   10   -   188   -   1   
lot   11   -   201   -   1   
lot   12   -   370   -   1   
HALIFAX PARISH      -   1108   -   -   5
   Ellerslie   -   160         
                  
lot   13   -   464   -   2   
lot   14   -   198   -   1   
lot   15   -   160   -   1   
lot   16   -   378   -   1   
lot   17   -   1272   -   3   
RICHMOND PARISH      -   2472   -   -   8
   Summerside   -   984         
   Tyne Valley   -   204         
   Wellington   -   197         
                  
lot   18   -   202   -   1   
lot   19   -   489   -   2   
lot   25   -   187   -   1   
lot   26   -   458   -   2   
lot   27   -   190   -   1   
lot   28   -   394   -   1   
ST. DAVID PARISH      -   1920   -   -   8
   Kensington   -   333         
   Bedeque   -   198         
   Carleton   -   164         
                  
PRINCETON      -   109   -   -   1
                  
lot   20   -   188   -   1   
lot   21   -   190   -   1   
lot   22   -   409   -   1   
lot   23   -   420   -   2   
lot   67   -   520   -   2   
GRENVILLE PARISH      -   1727   -   -   7
   Breadalbane   -   247         
   Cavendish   -   191         
   Hunter River   -   170         
      -            
lot   29   -   620   -   2   
lot   30   -   457   -   2   
lot   31   -   209   -   1   
lot   65   -   202   -   1   
HILLSBOROUGH PARISH      -   1488   -   -   6
   Crapaud   -   399         
   Bonshaw   -   204         
                  
lot   24   -   498   -   2   
lot   32   -   798   -   2   
lot   33   -   444   -   2   
lot   34   -   289   -   1   
CHARLOTTE PARISH      -   2029   -   -   7
   Cornwall   -   503         
   Rustico   -   300         
   Winsloe   -   233         
                  
CHARLOTTETOWN      -   1284   -   -   3
                  
lot   35   -   129   -   1   
lot   36   -   130   -   1   
lot   37   -   341   -   1   
lot   48   -   602   -   2   
lot   49   -   416   -   2   
BEDFORD PARISH      -   1618   -   -   7
   Rosebank   -   417         
   Mount Stewart   -   240         
                  
lot   50   -   398   -   1   
lot   57   -   197   -   1   
lot   58   -   379   -   1   
lot   60   -   112   -   1   
lot   62   -   132   -   1   
ST. JOHN PARISH      -   1218   -   -   5
   Belfast   -   187         
   Vernon Bridge   -   186         
                  
lot   38   -   150   -   1   
lot   39   -   169   -   1   
lot   40   -   487   -   2   
lot   41   -   372   -   1   
lot   42   -   178   -   1   
ST. PATRICK PARISH      -   1356   -   -   6
   Morell   -   280         
   St. Peters   -   180         
                  
lot   43   -   176   -   1   
lot   44   -   140   -   1   
lot   45   -   602   -   2   
lot   46   -   155   -   1   
lot   47   -   121   -   1   
EAST PARISH      -   1194   -   -   6
   Souris   -   400         
                  
lot   51   -   609   -   2   
lot   52   -   149   -   1   
lot   53   -   420   -   2   
lot   54   -   126   -   1   
lot   55   -   148   -   1   
lot   56   -   157   -   1   
lot   66   -   102   -   1   
ST. GEORGE PARISH      -   1711   -   -   9
   Montague   -   393         
   Cardigan   -   203         
                  
GEORGETOWN      -   410   -   -   2
                  
lot   59   -   158   -   1   
lot   61   -   202   -   1   
lot   63   -   409   -   1   
lot   64   -   423   -   2   
ST. ANDREW PARISH      -   1192   -   -   5
   Murray Harbour   -   209         
   Murray River   -   189         

         


1284   -   CHARLOTTETOWN
984   -   Summerside
503   -   Cornwall
417   -   Rosebank
410   -   GEORGETOWN
400   -   Souris
399   -   Crapaud
393   -   Montague
333   -   Kensington
314   -   Tignish
300   -   Rustico
280   -   Morell
247   -   Breadalbane
240   -   Mount Stewart
233   -   Winsloe
209   -   Murray Harbour
204   -   Tyne Valley
204   -   Bonshaw
203   -   Cardigan
198   -   Bedeque
197   -   Wellington
192   -   Albeton
191   -   Cavendish
189   -   Murray River
187   -   Belfast
186   -   Vernon Bridge
180   -   St. Peters
172   -   O'Leary
170   -   Hunter River
164   -   Carleton
160   -   Ellerslie
109   -   PRINCETON


2472   -   RICHMOND PARISH
2029   -   CHARLOTTE PARISH
1920   -   ST. DAVID PARISH
1727   -   GRENVILLE PARISH
1711   -   ST. GEORGE PARISH
1618   -   BEDFORD PARISH
1488   -   HILLSBOROUGH PARISH
1356   -   ST. PATRICK PARISH
1284   -   CHARLOTTETOWN
1218   -   ST. JOHN PARISH
1195   -   NORTH PARISH
1194   -   EAST PARISH
1192   -   ST. ANDREW PARISH
1154   -   EGMONT PARISH
1108   -   HALIFAX PARISH
410   -   GEORGETOWN
109   -   PRINCETON
      
23,185   - ISLAND WIDE   
      



Charlottetown      -   1284   -   3
Lot   17   -   1272   -   3
Lot   32   -   798   -   2
Lot   1   -   672   -   2
Lot   29   -   620   -   2
Lot   51   -   609   -   2
Lot   45   -   602   -   2
Lot   48   -   602   -   2
Lot   67   -   520   -   2
Lot   24   -   498   -   2
Lot   19   -   489   -   2
Lot   40   -   487   -   2
Lot   13   -   464   -   2
Lot   26   -   458   -   2
Lot   30   -   457   -   2
Lot   4   -   447   -   2
Lot   33   -   444   -   2
Lot   64   -   423   -   2
Lot   6   -   421   -   2
Lot   23   -   420   -   2
Lot   53   -   420   -   2
Lot   49   -   416   -   2
Georgetown      -   410   -   2
Lot   22   -   409   -   1
Lot   63   -   409   -   1
Lot   50   -   398   -   1
Lot   28   -   394   -   1
Lot   58   -   379   -   1
Lot   16   -   378   -   1
Lot   41   -   372   -   1
Lot   12   -   370   -   1
Lot   37   -   341   -   1
Lot   2   -   307   -   1
Lot   34   -   289   -   1
Lot   3   -   216   -   1
Lot   31   -   209   -   1
Lot   18   -   202   -   1
Lot   61   -   202   -   1
Lot   65   -   202   -   1
Lot   11   -   201   -   1
Lot   14   -   198   -   1
Lot   57   -   197   -   1
Lot   9   -   190   -   1
Lot   21   -   190   -   1
Lot   27   -   190   -   1
Lot   10   -   188   -   1
Lot   20   -   188   -   1
Lot   25   -   187   -   1
Lot   42   -   178   -   1
Lot   43   -   176   -   1
Lot   39   -   169   -   1
Lot   15   -   160   -   1
Lot   8   -   159   -   1
Lot   59   -   158   -   1
Lot   56   -   157   -   1
Lot   46   -   155   -   1
Lot   5   -   154   -   1
Lot   38   -   150   -   1
Lot   52   -   149   -   1
Lot   55   -   148   -   1
Lot   44   -   140   -   1
Lot   7   -   132   -   1
Lot   62   -   132   -   1
Lot   36   -   130   -   1
Lot   35   -   129   -   1
Lot   54   -   126   -   1
Lot   47   -   121   -   1
Lot   60   -   112   -   1
Princeton      -   109   -   1
Lot   66   -   102   -   1
               
Assembly            -   95





Some occupations that people have:
Farmer (50%+1 of the population does this)
Distiller
Cabinet Maker
Schoolmaster
Shoemaker
Carpenter
Blacksmith
Weaver
Mason
Fisherman
Shipbuilder
Tailor
Miller
Cooper
Merchant
Mechanic
Sailor
Post Master
Priest/Reverend
Butcher
Hotelkeeper
Doctor


For those who don't know...
a cooper is someone who makes wooden staved vessels of a conical form, of greater length than breadth, bound together with hoops and possessing flat ends or heads. Examples of a cooper's work include but are not limited to casks, barrels, buckets, tubs, butter churns, hogsheads, firkins, tierces, rundlets, puncheons, pipes, tuns, butts, pins, and breakers.



Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 27, 2010, 10:39:16 PM
TABLE OF CONTENTS


Price Samples, Spring of year 1
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=126923.msg2701448#msg2701448

Lot Concerns, Spring of year 1
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=126923.msg2700679#msg2700679

Rail Travel Times:
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=126923.msg2700620#msg2700620

Spring Budget, year 1:
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=126923.msg2700609#msg2700609

Parliament
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=126923.msg2700520#msg2700520

Currency Info:
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=126923.msg2700234#msg2700234


CURRENT ACTIONS:

Cargo Vessel under construction, Bedford Parish


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political game)
Post by: Barnes on October 27, 2010, 10:43:55 PM
I'd like St. Patrick, plz.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political game)
Post by: Countess Anya of the North Parish on October 27, 2010, 10:57:30 PM
i will take north.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political game)
Post by: Barnes on October 27, 2010, 11:08:38 PM
I'll take Lord. ;)


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political game)
Post by: Countess Anya of the North Parish on October 27, 2010, 11:16:23 PM
I pick countess. :)


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political game)
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on October 27, 2010, 11:23:59 PM
Director of Halifax please.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political game)
Post by: Sewer on October 27, 2010, 11:30:12 PM
Parish: Hillsborough.
Title: I submit grand poobah for approval.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political game)
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on October 27, 2010, 11:32:56 PM
ArchangelZero, The Director of Halifax.

Nickname: The Director for easy reference :P

Lol, I just found something to add to my name.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political game)
Post by: Sewer on October 27, 2010, 11:41:08 PM
fine, i will take duke.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 28, 2010, 12:48:23 AM
Sounds like fun. I'll play.

Put me down as Chancellor of Bedford.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 28, 2010, 12:57:20 AM
Can the brewery be in Bedford?


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political game)
Post by: Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl on October 28, 2010, 12:59:28 AM
Not sure how exactly this game will work, but I'd be willing to give it a try as archon of St. John....


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political game)
Post by: !@#$%^&* on October 28, 2010, 03:20:01 AM
I am Warden of the East.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese on October 28, 2010, 09:03:34 AM
Can I be the Bishop of St. David.

If Bishop is not approved as title I'll take Commander of St. David instead, but I'd prefer Bishop.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Bacon King on October 28, 2010, 11:13:02 AM
Mayor of Charlottetown plz.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Oakvale on October 28, 2010, 11:49:10 AM
I shall be Dean of Richmond if no-one else has taken it.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 28, 2010, 12:24:11 PM
I object most strongly to the Province's usurpation of Governor's Island and the surrounding territorial waters in Hillsborough Bay. On behalf of the citizenry of Bedford Parish, I demand either their immediate return, or just compensation for the loss of our territory.

(I wanted to say something about this when I first noticed it last night, but then the site crashed.)


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: homelycooking on October 28, 2010, 12:34:59 PM
Might I have Grenville?


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 28, 2010, 05:17:34 PM

You may.


Charlottetown is yours; however "Mayor" as a title is taken.

I shall be Dean of Richmond if no-one else has taken it.

It is yours.


Yes, you may also pick a title.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 28, 2010, 05:23:26 PM
My mistake, Mayor is not taken, it is yours.

Also, map updated. St. Andrew is the only free parish!

Three rural parishes remain reserved for the purposes of giving all of you something to fight over.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: homelycooking on October 28, 2010, 06:44:18 PM
Excellent. Then I shall henceforth be known by the style and title of homelycooking, Provost of Grenville.

(It's not a big deal, Teddy, but could you correct the spelling of my name on your territory map? Provosts do not appreciate the misspelling of their most honorable and majestic names. :) )


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 28, 2010, 06:49:52 PM
Excellent. Then I shall henceforth be known by the style and title of homelycooking, Provost of Grenville.

(It's not a big deal, Teddy, but could you correct the spelling of my name on your territory map? Provosts do not appreciate the misspelling of their most honorable and majestic names. :) )

Your name is "too long"

I will call you "Provost" ;D


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 28, 2010, 07:00:54 PM
I, the Right Honorable Chancellor of the Parish of Bedford, am greatly displeased that the provincial government continues to deny Bedford's rightful jurisdiction over Governor's Island and the surrounding territorial waters. These territorial waters are an integral part of Bedford, yet the provincial government continues to ignore the plight of our budding shipping industry. A stately residence in Charlottetown would be more than suitable for the provincial government's needs.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 28, 2010, 07:13:07 PM
I, the Right Honorable Chancellor of the Parish of Bedford, am greatly displeased that the provincial government continues to deny Bedford's rightful jurisdiction over Governor's Island and the surrounding territorial waters. These territorial waters are an integral part of Bedford, yet the provincial government continues to ignore the plight of our budding shipping industry. A stately residence in Charlottetown would be more than suitable for the provincial government's needs.

The island belongs to me :P Not the provincial government (which you can also call federal, or national)


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 28, 2010, 07:58:54 PM
I, the Right Honorable Chancellor of the Parish of Bedford, am greatly displeased that the provincial government continues to deny Bedford's rightful jurisdiction over Governor's Island and the surrounding territorial waters. These territorial waters are an integral part of Bedford, yet the provincial government continues to ignore the plight of our budding shipping industry. A stately residence in Charlottetown would be more than suitable for the provincial government's needs.

The island belongs to me :P Not the provincial government (which you can also call federal, or national)

I do not remember granting you or anyone else the deed to the island. Since your claim to the island postdates my accession to the Chancellory of Bedford Parish, I demand, on behalf of the Parish, just compensation for the unlawful seizure of territory. Furthermore, the Parish retains its claim on the territorial waters in Hillsborough Bay, since said waters are a vital part of Bedford's shipping and fishing industries.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 28, 2010, 08:19:29 PM
Also note you are all Senators! Each parish sends two Senators to the Senate, with the exception of the non-Charlottetown county seats, which each send one.

This is also an assembly, but none of you get to play in that, sorry :P


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 28, 2010, 08:26:56 PM
Statement from the King

The island remains under the civil administration of the parish, however, is private property of the crown, but that ownership is no different than the ownership of a farm by a private citizen with the parish, except that the owner is the crown.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 28, 2010, 08:36:38 PM
The Parish of Bedford does not dispute the claims of the crown, so long as Bedford's industries are at liberty to exploit the resources of Hillsborough Bay at their leisure.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Sewer on October 28, 2010, 08:38:04 PM
It is of the opinion of the Duke of Hillsborough that Hillsborough Bay should belong to Hillsborough.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 28, 2010, 08:51:28 PM
It is of the opinion of the Duke of Hillsborough that Hillsborough Bay belong to Hillsborough.

That claim is preposterous. The bay is Hillsborough in name only, as the Crown's surveyors have rightly declared.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 28, 2010, 09:07:56 PM
How far upstream is the Hillsborough River navigable?


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 28, 2010, 09:14:17 PM
SPRING UPDATES

Each parish collects a tithe of 10% on all income. This is what the citizens expect.
Each parish in turn sends 1/3rd of their income to the national government.

There are three different currencies on the island.
The Pound of Stirling Silver £
The Pound of Gold €
the Pound of Copper $

Though there are no set prices for conversion, 90-110 $ can buy you one £, and 30-35 £ can buy you one €


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 28, 2010, 09:15:16 PM

Depends on the size of the boat. In general, anything wide enough to be shown as an open river on the large map (and not just a line) is navigable by at least the smallest of boats. 


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 28, 2010, 09:33:49 PM

Depends on the size of the boat. In general, anything wide enough to be shown as an open river on the large map (and not just a line) is navigable by at least the smallest of boats.  

Let's say (hypothetically) that I wanted to take an ironclad frigate up the Hillsborough River. How far could I go? And what's the largest boat that could dock in Mount Stewart?


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Barnes on October 28, 2010, 10:42:18 PM
I, Barnes, Lord of St. Patrick, do hereby decree that a small, iron rail bridge shall be constructed to cross the Morrell River, and to replace the current, dilapidated, track.  The construction of said track shall be in way that shall not upset the daily train fare through the town of Morrell and the surrounding countryside.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Psychic Octopus on October 28, 2010, 11:39:51 PM
Last one here, St. Andrew, and I wish to be the Magistrate.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 12:51:16 AM

Depends on the size of the boat. In general, anything wide enough to be shown as an open river on the large map (and not just a line) is navigable by at least the smallest of boats.  

Let's say (hypothetically) that I wanted to take an ironclad frigate up the Hillsborough River. How far could I go? And what's the largest boat that could dock in Mount Stewart?

Although you do have the pleasure of owning and operating the largest, most militarily powerful boat in the entire island, I think that you should be aware of it's size. Here is a picture of the vessel.
()


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 12:53:23 AM
Last one here, St. Andrew, and I wish to be the Magistrate.
It is done.
I, Barnes, Lord of St. Patrick, do hereby decree that a small, iron rail bridge shall be constructed to cross the Morrell River, and to replace the current, dilapidated, track.  The construction of said track shall be in way that shall not upset the daily train fare through the town of Morrell and the surrounding countryside.
The current rail bridge provides for two tracks and a rail connection in both directions. It is considered to be "adequate" by current standards.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on October 29, 2010, 12:53:37 AM
As the Right Honourable Director of Halifax, I do request that the Parish of Egmont be dissolved due to a lack of organization and leader, and it's territory absorbed by North and Halifax Parish.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 01:25:44 AM
NORTH
Countess Anni - PRESENT
Deputy Senator - PRESENT
4 Assembly Members - PRESENT

EGMONT (NPC)
Captain Jane - Not Present
Deputy Senator - Not Present
5 Assembly Members - Not Present -1, war

HALIFAX
The Director - PRESENT
Deputy Senator - PRESENT
6 Assembly Members - PRESENT +1, war

RICHMOND
Dean Oakvale - PRESENT
Deputy Senator - PRESENT
8 Assembly Members - PRESENT

ST. DAVID
The Bishop - PRESENT
Deputy Senator - PRESENT
8 Assembly Members - PRESENT

PRINCETON (NPC)
Commander Rupert - PRESENT
Deputy Seantor - Not Present
1 Assembly Members - Not Present

GRENVILLE
Provost - PRESENT
Deputy Senator - PRESENT
7 Assembly Members - PRESENT

HILLSBOROUGH
Duke Sewer - PRESENT
Deputy Senator - PRESENT
6 Assembly Members - PRESENT

CHARLOTTE (NPC)
Reeve Lance - Not Present
Deputy Senator - PRESENT
7 Assembly Members - PRESENT

CHARLOTTETOWN
Mayor Bacon King - PRESENT
Deputy Senator - PRESENT
3 Assembly Members - PRESENT

BEDFORD
Chancellor Vazdul - PRESENT
Deputy Senator - PRESENT
7 Assembly Members - PRESENT

ST. JOHN
Archon Libertas - PRESENT
Deputy Senator - PRESENT
5 Assembly Members - PRESENT

ST. PATRICK
Lord Barnes - PRESENT
Deputy Senator - PRESENT
6 Assembly Members - PRESENT

EAST
Warden RosettaStoned - PRESENT
Deputy Senator - PRESENT
6 Assembly Members - PRESENT

ST. GEORGE (NPC)
Manager Robert - Not Present
Deputy Senator - Not Present
9 Assembly Members - PRESENT

GEORGETOWN (NPC)
Intendent David - PRESENT
Deputy Senator - PRESENT
2 Assembly Members - PRESENT

ST. ANDREW
Magistrate N!K - PRESENT
Deputy Senator - PRESENT
5 Assembly Members - PRESENT

88 of 95 Assembly Members are present.
26 of 32 Senators are present.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 01:27:05 AM
As the Right Honourable Director of Halifax, I do request that the Parish of Egmont be dissolved due to a lack of organization and leader, and it's territory absorbed by North and Halifax Parish.

Patience my friend :P

It does have a leader, but, as noted, the leader did not bother to show herself to the Senate, has not shown a deputy, nor has sent any Assembly members.


Also, more in a bit.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Bacon King on October 29, 2010, 01:50:56 AM
I, the Right Honorable Chancellor of the Parish of Bedford, am greatly displeased that the provincial government continues to deny Bedford's rightful jurisdiction over Governor's Island and the surrounding territorial waters. These territorial waters are an integral part of Bedford, yet the provincial government continues to ignore the plight of our budding shipping industry. A stately residence in Charlottetown would be more than suitable for the provincial government's needs.

As Mayor of Charlottetown, I must give my thanks to you for recognizing the prestige of my city. While I do sympathize with your argument, as Charlottetown's maritime industries are similarly nascent, I believe the correspondence from the Crown on the issue demonstrates a problem does not exist as such.

This territorial dispute does raise another issue, however; I assume the vessels that berth at Charlottetown have a right of passage through the "territorial" waters of neighboring parishes, do they not? Raising this issue of coastal control gives me concern that rural parishes may seek to abuse their power and cause duress to the industries of our fair capital city. In particular, I was perturbed by your seemingly veiled threat to patrol the Hillsborough River with heavily armed vessels! Do understand that Charlottetown is the heart of our island, both culturally and economically. Any action you take that weakens my city will weaken you as a result. I do hope that cool heads will prevail.



In addition, as Mayor of the Queen's County Seat, I would like to suggest a county-wide conference regarding the future status of Charlotte Parish. Reeve Lance's utter negligence towards his duties is most striking.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 29, 2010, 02:38:38 AM
I, the Right Honorable Chancellor of the Parish of Bedford, am greatly displeased that the provincial government continues to deny Bedford's rightful jurisdiction over Governor's Island and the surrounding territorial waters. These territorial waters are an integral part of Bedford, yet the provincial government continues to ignore the plight of our budding shipping industry. A stately residence in Charlottetown would be more than suitable for the provincial government's needs.

As Mayor of Charlottetown, I must give my thanks to you for recognizing the prestige of my city. While I do sympathize with your argument, as Charlottetown's maritime industries are similarly nascent, I believe the correspondence from the Crown on the issue demonstrates a problem does not exist as such.

This territorial dispute does raise another issue, however; I assume the vessels that berth at Charlottetown have a right of passage through the "territorial" waters of neighboring parishes, do they not? Raising this issue of coastal control gives me concern that rural parishes may seek to abuse their power and cause duress to the industries of our fair capital city. In particular, I was perturbed by your seemingly veiled threat to patrol the Hillsborough River with heavily armed vessels! Do understand that Charlottetown is the heart of our island, both culturally and economically. Any action you take that weakens my city will weaken you as a result. I do hope that cool heads will prevail.



In addition, as Mayor of the Queen's County Seat, I would like to suggest a county-wide conference regarding the future status of Charlotte Parish. Reeve Lance's utter negligence towards his duties is most striking.

At the present time, the Parish of Bedford will allow all ships passage through the waters under its jurisdiction. My main concern regarding the issue of territorial waters was that the crown would deny Bedford its right to fish in the waters of Hillsborough Bay that, on the map, are shown to belong to Bedford. As for warships in the Hillsborough River, I was more concerned about the fact that I might wake up one morning to discover that Rosebank or Mount Stewart had been bombarded. I know not the motives of my fellow Senators, and the defense of Bedford is my foremost concern.

With regard to Charlotte Parish, I am of the opinion that Reeve Lance should be stripped of his rank, and the Parish be divided amongst its neighbors. I propose the following division:

Lot 24: To Grenville
Lot 32: To Hillsborough
Lot 33: To Charlottetown
Lot 34: To Bedford

Further, I propose ferry service be initiated between Charlottetown and Rosebank. It is ludicrous that I must travel by rail for forty-some miles to take my seat in the Senate when I reside just across the river.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 03:01:31 AM
Note that the division of power between parishes and the national government has never quite been defined!


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 03:06:47 AM

As the Right Honourable Director of Halifax, I do request that the Parish of Egmont be dissolved due to a lack of organization and leader, and it's territory absorbed by North and Halifax Parish.

A messenger has arrived from Egmont.

They inform the Senate and Assembly that Jane is living a "private" live, farming and fishing, in Alberton, and that she has "no interest" in governing Egmont. Lots have elected Assemblymen (he claims to be the member for Lot 5, but without signed papers from the Captain of the Parish, this could be legally questioned). He says the Captain has not appointed a Deputy Senator (and thus why no one of that rank has shown up).

Assemblymen from the North Parish back up certain parts of the story. They say they were also told Jane has "no interest" in governing, that there is no Deputy Senator, and that elections were held from what they know.

The messenger from Egmont further states
Quote
I beg you in Halifax and North to send forces into the Parish. You will be greeted as Liberators.

This is also a good time to note that each Parish has a militia of 35 men.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 03:11:12 AM
I, the Right Honorable Chancellor of the Parish of Bedford, am greatly displeased that the provincial government continues to deny Bedford's rightful jurisdiction over Governor's Island and the surrounding territorial waters. These territorial waters are an integral part of Bedford, yet the provincial government continues to ignore the plight of our budding shipping industry. A stately residence in Charlottetown would be more than suitable for the provincial government's needs.

As Mayor of Charlottetown, I must give my thanks to you for recognizing the prestige of my city. While I do sympathize with your argument, as Charlottetown's maritime industries are similarly nascent, I believe the correspondence from the Crown on the issue demonstrates a problem does not exist as such.

This territorial dispute does raise another issue, however; I assume the vessels that berth at Charlottetown have a right of passage through the "territorial" waters of neighboring parishes, do they not? Raising this issue of coastal control gives me concern that rural parishes may seek to abuse their power and cause duress to the industries of our fair capital city. In particular, I was perturbed by your seemingly veiled threat to patrol the Hillsborough River with heavily armed vessels! Do understand that Charlottetown is the heart of our island, both culturally and economically. Any action you take that weakens my city will weaken you as a result. I do hope that cool heads will prevail.



In addition, as Mayor of the Queen's County Seat, I would like to suggest a county-wide conference regarding the future status of Charlotte Parish. Reeve Lance's utter negligence towards his duties is most striking.

At the present time, the Parish of Bedford will allow all ships passage through the waters under its jurisdiction. My main concern regarding the issue of territorial waters was that the crown would deny Bedford its right to fish in the waters of Hillsborough Bay that, on the map, are shown to belong to Bedford. As for warships in the Hillsborough River, I was more concerned about the fact that I might wake up one morning to discover that Rosebank or Mount Stewart had been bombarded. I know not the motives of my fellow Senators, and the defense of Bedford is my foremost concern.

With regard to Charlotte Parish, I am of the opinion that Reeve Lance should be stripped of his rank, and the Parish be divided amongst its neighbors. I propose the following division:

Lot 24: To Grenville
Lot 32: To Hillsborough
Lot 33: To Charlottetown
Lot 34: To Bedford

Further, I propose ferry service be initiated between Charlottetown and Rosebank. It is ludicrous that I must travel by rail for forty-some miles to take my seat in the Senate when I reside just across the river.

The Deputy Senator for Charlotte contests this, saying that there is no need.
Quote
The Reeve is carrying out his duties to the Parish. He has taken residence in Cornwall and left his farm Lot 34 to his Wife to manage. He is reclusive, but, is managing the affairs of the Parish. He has sent me specifically to represent the Parish, and has signed off on all assemblymen as required.

The Senator also indicates, privately, that Parish Unity is somewhat of a popular concept here, but that without a Reeve to tell him or his assemblymen how to vote, that he could be "persuaded" to support initiatives of "neighbours" if they were to "show their friendship" towards him. In other words, he indicates he can be bought for the right price. 


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 29, 2010, 03:21:23 AM
Privately, how does the Deputy Senator feel about £30 for Lot 34?


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 04:13:11 AM
He is outraged that this is even suggested.

It my be easier to buy votes and/or from this parish as a whole than to try and split it up.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Bacon King on October 29, 2010, 04:50:21 AM
Would a union between the town and parish of Charlotte be considerable to the Deputy Senator (who I'm going to give him the name Jameson for simplicity's sake, if that's okay)? Both would benefit immensely. As Mayor of Charlottetown I suggest a full partnership between our parishes, with myself, while remaining Mayor of my city, would simultaneously serve as the leader of a new Greater Charlotte Parish; I would charge the Reeve with governance of the existing rural territory; essentially the same job he has now without the national entanglements he deems undesireable. To demonstrate our unity I'd select Deputy Senator Jameson to continue his role for the combined Parish.

Such a union would be vastly beneficial to both Charlotte and Charlottetown; the city contains many wealthy merchants and thus has a sizable tax base, which then would be directly available to improving the communities of the rural Charlotte Parish and the lives of its people. In addition, the closer economic ties that unity brings would benefit all citizens of both regions. I also discretely note to Deputy Senator Jameson that, with the greater government funds, Charlottetown compensates its officials for their service a significantly greater amount than a rural parish could provide.

If such a complete union is not a possibility, however, the government of Charlottetown notes that it is always open to a closer partnership with its northern neighbor in any way it finds possible.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese on October 29, 2010, 04:55:52 AM
As Bishop of St. David, I'd like to extend blessings to all my fellow Senators, and to ask them not to quarrel about land and water in this manner, for we are all the children of God, and it is all God's land. For who makes Hillsborough Bay so rich if not God? Who makes the fish swim, who makes the ships sail, and who makes the seagulls fly? It is our Lord, and therefore I think that whoever Hillborough Bay belongs to in this mortal world, the Church (and as leader of the church on this island in extension me) has the right to at least 10% of all income made exploiting the Bay's Resources.   


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 04:58:51 AM
Would a union between the town and parish of Charlotte be considerable to the Deputy Senator (who I'm going to give him the name Jameson for simplicity's sake, if that's okay)? Both would benefit immensely. As Mayor of Charlottetown I suggest a full partnership between our parishes, with myself, while remaining Mayor of my city, would simultaneously serve as the leader of a new Greater Charlotte Parish; I would charge the Reeve with governance of the existing rural territory; essentially the same job he has now without the national entanglements he deems undesireable. To demonstrate our unity I'd select Deputy Senator Jameson to continue his role for the combined Parish.

Such a union would be vastly beneficial to both Charlotte and Charlottetown; the city contains many wealthy merchants and thus has a sizable tax base, which then would be directly available to improving the communities of the rural Charlotte Parish and the lives of its people. In addition, the closer economic ties that unity brings would benefit all citizens of both regions. I also discretely note to Deputy Senator Jameson that, with the greater government funds, Charlottetown compensates its officials for their service a significantly greater amount than a rural parish could provide.

If such a complete union is not a possibility, however, the government of Charlottetown notes that it is always open to a closer partnership with its northern neighbor in any way it finds possible.
He is open to this idea, but not of complete union at this time, rather, of working together in a close manner.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Bacon King on October 29, 2010, 05:09:01 AM
Further, I propose ferry service be initiated between Charlottetown and Rosebank. It is ludicrous that I must travel by rail for forty-some miles to take my seat in the Senate when I reside just across the river.

As mayor, I agree wholeheartedly. Such a link between our communities would be beneficial to us both; in principle you along with every citizen of your parish deserves the right to swift and efficient travel to their nation's capital. In addition, we know it will economically benefit both our regions, as your residents can travel more easily to purchase the rarer commodities found only in our regional hub and the businessmen of the city will find it more convenient to conduct transactions in your towns as well.

Would a union between the town and parish of Charlotte be considerable to the Deputy Senator (who I'm going to give him the name Jameson for simplicity's sake, if that's okay)? Both would benefit immensely. As Mayor of Charlottetown I suggest a full partnership between our parishes, with myself, while remaining Mayor of my city, would simultaneously serve as the leader of a new Greater Charlotte Parish; I would charge the Reeve with governance of the existing rural territory; essentially the same job he has now without the national entanglements he deems undesireable. To demonstrate our unity I'd select Deputy Senator Jameson to continue his role for the combined Parish.

Such a union would be vastly beneficial to both Charlotte and Charlottetown; the city contains many wealthy merchants and thus has a sizable tax base, which then would be directly available to improving the communities of the rural Charlotte Parish and the lives of its people. In addition, the closer economic ties that unity brings would benefit all citizens of both regions. I also discretely note to Deputy Senator Jameson that, with the greater government funds, Charlottetown compensates its officials for their service a significantly greater amount than a rural parish could provide.

If such a complete union is not a possibility, however, the government of Charlottetown notes that it is always open to a closer partnership with its northern neighbor in any way it finds possible.
He is open to this idea, but not of complete union at this time, rather, of working together in a close manner.

I shall see that his senatorial residence here in the capital is as stately as possible.

I'd also like to ask, although a full union is recognizably not possible currently, if he supports a degree of budgetary assistance to his parish's government. This would, of course, include a stipend for all members of the Charlotte Parish delegation. I seek the best for our sister parish. In return, I ask that I also be allowed (assuming this is possible- if it isn't just disregard this sentence) that I be allowed to be the Reeve's voting proxy here in the capital.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Bacon King on October 29, 2010, 05:21:29 AM
As Bishop of St. David, I'd like to extend blessings to all my fellow Senators, and to ask them not to quarrel about land and water in this manner, for we are all the children of God, and it is all God's land. For who makes Hillsborough Bay so rich if not God? Who makes the fish swim, who makes the ships sail, and who makes the seagulls fly? It is our Lord, and therefore I think that whoever Hillborough Bay belongs to in this mortal world, the Church (and as leader of the church on this island in extension me) has the right to at least 10% of all income made exploiting the Bay's Resources.   

While I have nothing but faith in our Lord, or your spiritual guidance, I find your demands frankly preposterous. You know as well as I that the fisherman of the bay are all good Christians, just like you and I and nearly everyone on this island, so the Church already receives exactly what you demand through the religious tithes of the sailors.

I'd like to question as well, your role leading St. David; specifically, the division between the worlds temporal and eternal. While you, most holy Bishop, have been selected to lead your parish, you are also the leader of our entire Christian community. I do hope your elected office does not lead you to, directly or indirectly, bias your judgement as Bishop. While I do trust in you, know that I will cry foul at the first instance of whatever political favoritism you attempt while proclaiming to speak on behalf of the Lord's Church. I am a wealthy man, and I give much to your church- but I could not stand to see a single pence being spent on corruption.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 05:28:49 AM
ASSETS / BUDGET
(Things owned by the various goverments)

NATIONAL GOVERNMENT
179 Horses
268 Cattle
111 Hogs
515 Sheep
21 Boats
41 €
1,209 £
172,114 $
3' 6" gauge track: Dual track; length of 460 miles.
3 lite locomotive (rail) boilers (wood burning) (attached to shells)
3 lite locomotive (rail) shells (One attached to each "train")
6 passenger rail cars (Two attached to each "train")
18 freight fail cars (Six attached to each "train")


NORTH
29 Horses
44 Cattle
14 Hogs
88 Sheep
3 Boats
4 €
140 £
19,994 $

EGMONT
30 Horses
42 Cattle
16 Hogs
90 Sheep
2 Boats
4 €
144 £
20,102 $

HALIFAX
32 Horses
47 Cattle
19 Hogs
89 Sheep
3 Boats
4 €
150 £
20,001 $

RICHMOND
46 Horses
62 Cattle
28 Hogs
122 Sheep
4 Boats
6 €
172 £
29,210 $

ST. DAVID
40 Horses
49 Cattle
21 Hogs
104 Sheep
3 Boats
5 €
160 £
23,333 $

PRINCETON
8 Horses
6 Cattle
2 Hogs
12 Sheep
2 Boats
2 €
50 £
12,406 $

GRENVILLE
34 Horses
53 Cattle
21 Hogs
107 Sheep
3 Boats
5 €
148 £
21,717 $

HILLSBORUGH
38 Horses
57 Cattle
18 Hogs
122 Sheep
3 Boats
6 €
147 £
22,525 $

CHARLOTTE
40 Horses
48 Cattle
20 Hogs
104 Sheep
4 Boats
4 €
164 £
22,012 $

CHARLOTTETOWN
12 Horses
8 Cattle
6 Hogs
8 Sheep
4 Boats
6 €
161 £ 50£
31,974 $
1 half-finished freight rail car (under construction)
2 Cargo Vessels (under construction)

BEDFORD
39 Horses
60 Cattle
26 Hogs
120 Sheep
3 Boats
4 €
129 £ -30
22,009 $
1 Cargo Vessel (Under Construction)

ST. JOHN
35 Horses
53 Cattle
19 Hogs
99 Sheep
2 Boats
5 €
141 £
20,154 $

ST. PATRICK
33 Horses
52 Cattle
24 Hogs
94 Sheep
3 Boats
6 €
139 £
21,077 $

EAST
31 Horses
48 Cattle
18 Hogs
89 Sheep
3 Boats
5 €
160 £
21,099 $

ST. GEORGE
36 Horses
56 Cattle
24 Hogs
112 Sheep
4 Boats
4 €
168 £
22,124 $

GEORGETOWN
15 Horses
12 Cattle
4 Hogs
18 Sheep
2 Boats
3 €
121 £
17,114 $



Note that Tithes come in once a season.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese on October 29, 2010, 06:01:38 AM


While I have nothing but faith in our Lord, or your spiritual guidance, I find your demands frankly preposterous. You know as well as I that the fisherman of the bay are all good Christians, just like you and I and nearly everyone on this island, so the Church already receives exactly what you demand through the religious tithes of the sailors.

I'd like to question as well, your role leading St. David; specifically, the division between the worlds temporal and eternal. While you, most holy Bishop, have been selected to lead your parish, you are also the leader of our entire Christian community. I do hope your elected office does not lead you to, directly or indirectly, bias your judgement as Bishop. While I do trust in you, know that I will cry foul at the first instance of whatever political favoritism you attempt while proclaiming to speak on behalf of the Lord's Church. I am a wealthy man, and I give much to your church- but I could not stand to see a single pence being spent on corruption.

Ah my dearest mayor, bless your heart, of course you are correct that it is indeed of great importance not to mix up one's spirtual commission with ones earthtly commission. As a high leader of this island I need to both advance the ideas and intrests of our Christian community as a whole, as well as the intrest of my parish. I assure you that there is no intent to abuse my power as leader of a Christian community, to enrich my own house or my own constituency. As a matter of fact I would love to take this oppertunity to invite his excellency the Chancellor of Bedford, and his grace the Duke of Hillsborugh to my humble church in Kensington for a peace and reconciliation mass, where I, as an independant servant of God, could help them to resolve this conflict in a way that benefits all parties involved.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 06:07:31 AM
RAIL TRAVEL TIMES:

Tignish to Summerside: 3 hours
Summerside to Emerald Junction (rail junction): 45 minutes
Emerald Junction to Carleton: 45 minutes
Emerald Junction to Royalty Junction (outside C'town): 1 hour 15 minutes
Royalty Junction to Charlottetown: 15 minutes
Royalty Junction to Mount Stewart Junction: 45 minutes
Mount Steward Junction to Lake Verde (south of Clarkin): 30 minutes
Lake Verde to Rosebank: 30 minutes
Lake Verde to Murray Habour: 1 hour 45 minutes
Mount Stewart Junction to Montague Junction: 45 minutes
Montague Junction to Montague: 15 minutes
Montague Junction to Georgetown: 15 minutes
Mount Stewart to Harmony Junction (in the east): 1 hour 15 minutes
Harmony Junction to Souris: 15 minutes
Harmony Junction to Elmira: 30 minutes


Train A departs Tignish at 6am and arrives in Summerside at 9am. It arrives then in Carleton at 10:30 and Charlottetown at 12:30.
Train A departs Charlottetown at 2:30pm for Carleton, arriving at 4:30. It arrives in Summerside at 6pm, and in Tignish at 9pm.

Train B departs Elmira at 6am and arrives in Souris at 7:15. It arrives in Mount Stewart at 8:45. It arrives in Rosebank at 9:45. at 10:00 it departs, and arrives in Mount Stewart at 11:00. It arrives in Charlottetown at 12:00
Train B departs Charlottetown at 3:00pm for Mount Stewart, arriving at 4pm. It arrives in Rosebank at 5pm. At 5:15pm it departs for Mount Stewart arriving at 6:15pm. It arrives in Souris at 7:45. It arrives in Elmira at 9pm.

Train C departs Murray Harbour at 6am and arrives in Rosebank at 8:15. It arrives in Mount Stewart at 9:15, and in Montague at 10:15. It arrives in Georgetown at 10:45, and in Mount Stewart at 11:45. It arrives in Charlottetown at 12:45.
Train C departs Charlottetown at 2:15pm and arrives in Mount Stewart at 3:15. It arrives in Georgetown at 4:15 and in Montague at 4:45. It arrives in Mount Stewart at 5:45 and in Rosebank at 6:45. It arrives in Murray Harbour at 9pm.

WHARFS (for ferry travel, or ship docking)
CHARLOTTETOWN
ROSEBANK
ALBERTON
TYNE VALLEY
SUMMERSIDE
PRINCETON
CARLTON
RUSTICO
CRAPAUD
VERNON BRIDGE
WOOD ISLAND
MURRAY HARBOUR
MONTAGUE
GEORGETOWN
CARDIGAN
MORELL
SOURIS

REGULAR FERRY ROUTES:
Charlottetown to Rosebank. Runs once every hour, departing Charlottetown on the :00 and Rosebank on the :30. Service from Sunrise, lasting to 2 hours after Sunset. Ends run in Chalottetown. Boat too small to handle much freight; passenger ferry only. Operated by the National Government.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 07:29:40 AM
The Deputy Senator for Charlotte is very happy with his new accommodations in Charlottetown, as well as that Parish's Assemblymen.

They however inform the Mayor that the parish will not require money itself.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Bacon King on October 29, 2010, 07:53:11 AM
The Deputy Senator for Charlotte is very happy with his new accommodations in Charlottetown, as well as that Parish's Assemblymen.

Glad to hear it!



While I have nothing but faith in our Lord, or your spiritual guidance, I find your demands frankly preposterous. You know as well as I that the fisherman of the bay are all good Christians, just like you and I and nearly everyone on this island, so the Church already receives exactly what you demand through the religious tithes of the sailors.

I'd like to question as well, your role leading St. David; specifically, the division between the worlds temporal and eternal. While you, most holy Bishop, have been selected to lead your parish, you are also the leader of our entire Christian community. I do hope your elected office does not lead you to, directly or indirectly, bias your judgement as Bishop. While I do trust in you, know that I will cry foul at the first instance of whatever political favoritism you attempt while proclaiming to speak on behalf of the Lord's Church. I am a wealthy man, and I give much to your church- but I could not stand to see a single pence being spent on corruption.

Ah my dearest mayor, bless your heart, of course you are correct that it is indeed of great importance not to mix up one's spirtual commission with ones earthtly commission. As a high leader of this island I need to both advance the ideas and intrests of our Christian community as a whole, as well as the intrest of my parish. I assure you that there is no intent to abuse my power as leader of a Christian community, to enrich my own house or my own constituency. As a matter of fact I would love to take this oppertunity to invite his excellency the Chancellor of Bedford, and his grace the Duke of Hillsborugh to my humble church in Kensington for a peace and reconciliation mass, where I, as an independant servant of God, could help them to resolve this conflict in a way that benefits all parties involved.

I'm glad we could come to an understanding, honorable Bishop.

As mayor of our capital city, at the center of of the bonds that tie all of this islands communities together, I am very interested in maintaining peace throughout the entire island. I therefore humbly request permission to attend your service as well.

REGULAR FERRY ROUTES:
Charlottetown to Rosebank. Runs once every hour, departing Charlottetown on the :00 and Rosebank on the :30. Service from Sunrise, lasting to 2 hours after Sunset. Ends run in Chalottetown. Boat too small to handle much freight; passenger ferry only. Operated by the National Government.

Awesome.

And as a curiosity, how many vessels capable of carrying cargo exist on the island? Who owns them?


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 08:00:05 AM
In the meantime, a man identifying himself as the representative of Lot 7 has arrived. He and the supposed member for Lot 5 have identical stories, and, they confirm each other's story.

Issues and Concerns, lot by lot.

Lot 1: No concerns at this time.
Lot 2: Improvement of the road from St. Lous to Miminegash from Dirt/Mud to Gravel or a mix of Gravel and wood chips. This is a Parish issue. (P)
Lot 3: No concerns at this time.

Lot 4: No representative to petition for concern.
Lot 5: Wishes annexation by North Parish.
Lot 6: No representative to petition for concern.
Lot 7: Wishes annexation by Halifax Parish.

Lot 8: Creation of a road from Dunblane to Hebron. Currently a forest trail. (P)
Lot 9: Creation of a road from Hebron to Coleman. Current a forest trail. (P)
Lot 10: No concerns at this time
Lot 11: Desires a wharf to be created at the mouth of the Foxley River. (P)
Lot 11: Additionally wishes for a rail junction and connection to the settlement. This issue could be a national issue, or if the Parish wishes, it can deal with this itself. (P/N)
Lot 12: No concerns.

Lot 13: Nothing of note, but there is some hostility towards Lot 12.
Lot 14: Nothing.
Lot 15: Settlers do more fishing than settlers in any other lot. Fishing does not bring in as much money as farming, and thus, they are looking for government support. (P/N)
Lot 16: Proposal to relocate the Parish Offices (Capitol) to Wellington.
Lot 17: Proposal from the rural parts of the lot to "look at" separating Summerside from the lot. (P)
Lot 17: Proposal from the town of Summerside to "look at" separating Summerside from the lot. (P)

Princeton: Nothing

Lot 18: Nothing
Lot 19: Proposal to double the size of the local church. (P/N)
Lot 25: Nothing
Lot 26: Nothing
Lot 27: Nothing
Lot 28: Proposal to send vessels to explore the distant but visible coastline (New Brunswick) south of the lot. (P/N)

Lot 20: Nothing
Lot 21: Nothing
Lot 22: Concern raised about the grade approaching and departing from Hunter River on the rail line, however, no solutions proposed (P/N)
Lot 23: Desire for a local Wharf (P/N)
Lot 67: This lot has the richest farmland in all of PEI, but is the only 'normal' landlocked lot. There is a proposal to move the Capital Buildings of PEI to Breadalbane while leaving Charlottetown as an "Urban Parish" (N)

Lot 29: Proposal to rename Crapaud to Victoria (P)
Lot 30: Bonshaw would like to host the Parish Capitol (P)
Lot 31: Proposal to annex the "strip" of lot 65 (P/N)
Lot 65: Nothing

Lot 24: Concerns raised over river fords on the road to the rest of the Parish. Residents would like real bridges (P/N)
Lot 32: Proposal to open a ferry from Ferry Point, east of Cornwall, to downtown Charlottetown (P/N)
Lot 33: Nothing
Lot 34: Nothing

Charlottetown: Concerns raised as Charlottetown is the only true and large "City" on the Island. Residents want to see how strong their City government will be and if it can be seen as a true Parish. (P)
Charlottetown: Concerns over the fact that, if looked at as a parish, is severely under-represented in the Assembly (N)

Lot 35: Concerns from residents south of the river that their portion of the lot is being ignored (P)
Lot 36: Concerns from residents north of the river that their portion of the lot is being ignored (P)
Lot 37: Nothing, in fact, these residents are happier than any other lot on the island.
Lot 48: Proposal for a bridge to Charlottetown to be examined (P/N)
Lot 49: Demands from the settlement of Pownal for a re-route of the rail line though their village. (P/N)

Lot 50: Demands that the Capitol be moved from Belfast to Vernon Bridge (P)
Lot 57: Considering how close the village of Orwell is to lot 50, residents would like the area re-surveyed (P/N)
Lot 58: Demand for a wharf in Belfast
Lot 60: Nothing.
Lot 62: Nothing.

Lot 38: nothing
Lot 39: nothing
Lot 40: nothing
Lot 41: nothing
Lot 42: controversy over a proposal to add a sixth house to the village of five houses, residents demand redress from the parish (P)

Lot 43: nothing
Lot 44: Desire for a wharf at Rollo Bay (P/N)
Lot 45: nothing
Lot 46: nothing
Lot 47: nothing

Lot 66: This lot legally belongs to the king, however, most of it has been sold to private farms. It is smaller than any other lot, and this has prompted concerns among residents. Some propose it be merged in whole with Lot 51, others propose it be split between lots 49, 50, and 57. There is a strong desire to make major changes to this lot but there is no clear suggestion as to how to do that. (P/N)
Lot 51: nothing
Lot 52: nothing
Lot 53: nothing
Lot 54: nothing
Lot 55: nothing
Lot 56: Demands for a local wharf.

Georgetown: concerns about the size of the city, concerns it is not growing as fast as Charlottetown, concerns it has been over-taken by Summerside, Cornwall, and Rosebank in terms of population, desire for redress. (P/N)

Lot 59: nothing
Lot 61: nothing
Lot 63: Desire for a local wharf
Lot 64: nothing




Concerns about other areas.

Princeton: Concerns that this "town" is too small to be a "county seat" and some suggestion that this role be transfered to Summerside.
Princeton: Some historic claim from Lot 18 to the area, however, there is also a claim from Lot 14.
Charlottetown: Winsloe residents, living a 90 minute walk from Charlottetown, would like the ability to work in the city. While nothing currently prevents them from doing so, they would like a local City/Parish law passed within Charlottetown that recognizes their right to do just this.
Georgetown: Some have proposed annexing this to a rural lot or parish.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 08:02:02 AM

And as a curiosity, how many vessels capable of carrying cargo exist on the island? Who owns them?

There are some larger vessels out there (note the picture of the one belonging to Bedford Parish)

There are rumors that a fisherman from Richmond owns a larger one, but this has not been confirmed.

There currently are no cargo vessels known to exist, however, there are enough sawmills to build one if some government were to wish to do so.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 08:27:26 AM
Note that this is the Calendar that we are using

()

Spring begins on what we would consider to be March 1.

It is now "Week 2" of Spring.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on October 29, 2010, 08:59:04 AM
I will have no issue with sending the local militia to Lot 7, and it has been done so immediately.  However, I am not clear on the procedures of annexation of a fellow parish, and in order to not offend the Crown, I shall wait for further instruction before taking full control of the area.

But that also leaves the fates of Lot 6.  I will resign the matter of Lot 4 to North Parish, seeing that the Countess will undoubtedly take full control of that situation herself.

I shall not move the militia into Lot 6 as of yet.  However, if given the authority by either the Government or the Crown, I will immediately annex Lot 6 as well.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: homelycooking on October 29, 2010, 10:07:43 AM
The Most Honorable and Majestic homelycooking, Provost of Grenville, offers his salutations to the various senators and leaders of the parishes of God's most glorious island. It is his sincere hope that through common cause we may gain lasting victory over the deleterious effects of ignorance, famine and insularity.

Taking up the major causes of concern for the good people of Grenville, then, the Provost wishes to express his support for the proposal that the administrative functions of the Government of Prince Edward Island be moved to the town of Breadalbane. It is in the interest of the entire island to have a capital located in a central location such as Lot 67 of Grenville, and the Provost is willing to offer any and all support to efforts moving in such a direction.

Second, it is imperative that the industrious yeoman farmers of Grenville be permitted a more convenient outlet for the sundry agricultural products of the parish. The Provost expresses his indignancy that the most fertile parish on the island has no outlet to the sea, and believes that the construction of a wharf and new rail line along the northern coast of the island running from Princeton to Charlottetown and passing through New London, Cavendish and Rustico would allow trade to flow more freely, permitting a newfound prosperity to pervade the island.

Third, the Provost is willing to allow the extant rail line currently passing through Hunter River to bypass the town and proceed straight from North Wiltshire to Breadalbane, in exchange for the aforementioned coastal link and necessary provisions for the economic well-being of Hunter River.

The Provost invites all other noble leaders of this most glorious island to confer with him so that the best possible solutions for our people may be arrived at.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Oakvale on October 29, 2010, 10:28:37 AM
As Dean of Richmond, I'd like to offer my greetings to my fellow leaders of the other parishes on our magnificent island. I hope that we can work together for the common good of our community.

Also, I have heard the aforementioned rumours about a large boat owned by a local fisherman, but as of yet we have not been able to find this legendary vessel.



Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 10:45:03 AM
I will have no issue with sending the local militia to Lot 7, and it has been done so immediately.  However, I am not clear on the procedures of annexation of a fellow parish, and in order to not offend the Crown, I shall wait for further instruction before taking full control of the area.

But that also leaves the fates of Lot 6.  I will resign the matter of Lot 4 to North Parish, seeing that the Countess will undoubtedly take full control of that situation herself.

I shall not move the militia into Lot 6 as of yet.  However, if given the authority by either the Government or the Crown, I will immediately annex Lot 6 as well.

It will take some hours to send the orders to the parish, and some further hours to get people into position. The "invasion" can begin in the morning.

35 citizens are registered in the Militia, how many do you wish to send? Do you wish to ask them to bring horses, and if, having none, equip them with horses?

Do you wish to issue a order of battle (IE direct the troops) or do you wish for the commanders of the militia to do that themselves?


The Most Honorable and Majestic homelycooking, Provost of Grenville, offers his salutations to the various senators and leaders of the parishes of God's most glorious island. It is his sincere hope that through common cause we may gain lasting victory over the deleterious effects of ignorance, famine and insularity.

Taking up the major causes of concern for the good people of Grenville, then, the Provost wishes to express his support for the proposal that the administrative functions of the Government of Prince Edward Island be moved to the town of Breadalbane. It is in the interest of the entire island to have a capital located in a central location such as Lot 67 of Grenville, and the Provost is willing to offer any and all support to efforts moving in such a direction.

Second, it is imperative that the industrious yeoman farmers of Grenville be permitted a more convenient outlet for the sundry agricultural products of the parish. The Provost expresses his indignancy that the most fertile parish on the island has no outlet to the sea, and believes that the construction of a wharf and new rail line along the northern coast of the island running from Princeton to Charlottetown and passing through New London, Cavendish and Rustico would allow trade to flow more freely, permitting a newfound prosperity to pervade the island.
It should be noted building rail lines is extremely cost prohibitive.

Third, the Provost is willing to allow the extant rail line currently passing through Hunter River to bypass the town and proceed straight from North Wiltshire to Breadalbane, in exchange for the aforementioned coastal link and necessary provisions for the economic well-being of Hunter River.

The Provost invites all other noble leaders of this most glorious island to confer with him so that the best possible solutions for our people may be arrived at.
Being in a valley, any diversion around the town would require a great deal of new rail.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Bacon King on October 29, 2010, 01:40:23 PM
First off, allow me to declare that my city is the only suitable location for our nation's capitol complex. We are the economic and cultural heart of our island; I mean no disrespect to the honorable Provost or the people of Breadalbane, but a farming community is simply not the proper location for our capital. Charlotte Town is not simply a parish, but a mighty city as well, and thus the only location with adequate infrastructure and facilities to be our nation's home.

The argument has also been made that Breadalbane is appropriate as a "central" location. Central for who? The majority of our island's parishes are closer to Charlotte Town. We are not only the social, cultural, and economic heart of Prince Edward Island, we are in fact the geographic heart as well. I have nothing but respect for all our island's leaders and citizens, but this issue is a matter of principle in which I will not compromise.



I must raise another issue- my city is grossly underrepresented in the national assembly. We have, for example, more citizens than either Egmont or East Parish but half the representatives.  As a matter of fairness, decency, and justice, I must demand that the people of Charlotte Town receive equal representation in our nation's legislature.



Regarding other issues that have been raised, I note my continued unwavering support for greater connectivity and trade amongst all parishes. I support a bridge across the Hillsborough River, the right of Winsloe residents (and all others, for that matter) to work within Charlotte Town, the construction of more whorfs across the island, and a national investment in larger transport vessels capable of carrying cargo. Economic ties make us all stronger.



On a closing note, I urge that the situation in the west be resolved with tact and caution- no man wants bloodshed to result.

I hope that we can all share our lives peacefully without undue dispute, so that greater prosperity may be shared by all.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 29, 2010, 02:08:46 PM
I begin by accepting His Grace the Bishop of St. David's gracious invitation to his church. It is my dearest wish to live in a state of peace and cooperation with my compatriots, in the highest order of Christian virtue.

Second, I decree that a settlement, with a wharf, be built on Bedford Bay in Lot 36, with good roads leading to Mount Stewart and Tracadie. A similar settlement shall be built at the confluence of the Hillsborough and Johnstone Rivers in Lot 35, with a good road leading to Mermaid.

Third, I ask that the railroad in the southern portion of Bedford Parish be rerouted through the town of Pownal, an integral part of Bedford's fishing industry.

Fourth, I decree that the sawmills in Mermaid and Mount Stewart begin producing large boats capable of carrying cargo posthaste.

Fifth, while I support the proposal for a bridge across the Hillsborough River between Rosebank and Charlottetown, it is imperative that this be done in such a manner that does not impede the potential flow of maritime traffic on the river east of Charlottetown. I will not approve of any bridge that does not allow a medium sized cargo ship to pass.

Sixth, I most wholeheartedly oppose any movement of the seat of the national government. Charlottetown is an ideal location. However, the parish of Bedford is willing to construct stately residences for Senators and other officials of the national government in upscale Rosebank, convenient to the national capital, but much more quiet and friendly than the city itself.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: homelycooking on October 29, 2010, 04:18:55 PM
The Chancellor's rhetoric is reasonable and well informed, and the Provost does not feel that the relocation of the island's capitol to Breadalbane needs to be a critical issue of concern, as economic inequities are much more relevant to the current condition of the island. After all, the good people of Grenville Parish care about the price of their wheat and barley, not obscure political machinations. It is the Provost's desire to facilitate trade between the people of our parishes, and would prefer the town of Breadalbane to be a prosperous economic trading city rather than an admittedly small (in population), landlocked political capitol.

The Provost wishes to propose that any funding provided by the national coffers be equitably distributed among the parishes. As such, he would support a bridge spanning the Hillsborough River if it were contained in an omnibus transportation package that adequately addresses transportation deficiencies across the entire island. This package should include the Provost's proposal to re-route the railway passing through Hunter River, as the dangerously steep grade on the only link between the island's East and West threatens commerce between the parishes. 



Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 29, 2010, 05:20:10 PM
Can we have a rough estimate of how much certain things cost? Is £1 of in-game money worth (in a real-life modern day setting) closer to one dollar, one thousand dollars, or one million dollars?


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: homelycooking on October 29, 2010, 05:23:09 PM
The Provost would also like to request an explicit deliniation of the powers relegated to various governmental bodies.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on October 29, 2010, 05:55:33 PM
I will have no issue with sending the local militia to Lot 7, and it has been done so immediately.  However, I am not clear on the procedures of annexation of a fellow parish, and in order to not offend the Crown, I shall wait for further instruction before taking full control of the area.

But that also leaves the fates of Lot 6.  I will resign the matter of Lot 4 to North Parish, seeing that the Countess will undoubtedly take full control of that situation herself.

I shall not move the militia into Lot 6 as of yet.  However, if given the authority by either the Government or the Crown, I will immediately annex Lot 6 as well.

It will take some hours to send the orders to the parish, and some further hours to get people into position. The "invasion" can begin in the morning.

35 citizens are registered in the Militia, how many do you wish to send? Do you wish to ask them to bring horses, and if, having none, equip them with horses?

Do you wish to issue a order of battle (IE direct the troops) or do you wish for the commanders of the militia to do that themselves?

It is best for the commanders of the Militia to take charge.   My order is to split the militia into two groups, 13 troops and my top commander will annex Lot 7.  12 troops under the second-in-command will remain on the border of Halifax and will be prepared to move into Lot 6 when the need arises.  The remaining 10 shall stay within the Parish to keep ourselves defended.

It is by my decree that until this crisis is resolved, all other projects will be put on hold in Halifax Parish.

x The Director


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 06:58:40 PM
Starting with the military issue:
The men have been organized as such and will head out in the morning.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 07:14:08 PM
The Provost would also like to request an explicit deliniation of the powers relegated to various governmental bodies.
None was ever decided upon.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 07:25:42 PM
Can we have a rough estimate of how much certain things cost? Is £1 of in-game money worth (in a real-life modern day setting) closer to one dollar, one thousand dollars, or one million dollars?
All of the currencies are too "new" to have any such set value, however there are some rough ideas:

House 10-15£
Horse 4-6£
Cow 30-60$
Sheep 5-10$

Road building is cheap, rail building is very expensive.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 07:35:24 PM
I begin by accepting His Grace the Bishop of St. David's gracious invitation to his church. It is my dearest wish to live in a state of peace and cooperation with my compatriots, in the highest order of Christian virtue.

Second, I decree that a settlement, with a wharf, be built on Bedford Bay in Lot 36, with good roads leading to Mount Stewart and Tracadie. A similar settlement shall be built at the confluence of the Hillsborough and Johnstone Rivers in Lot 35, with a good road leading to Mermaid.
Workers will search for a suitable location along bedford bay and report back. Workers note that the southern end of lot 35 has some of the poorest people on the entire island as the land is very swampy and not suitable for farming. No suitable location for a wharf could be found in the southern portion of this lot.

Third, I ask that the railroad in the southern portion of Bedford Parish be rerouted through the town of Pownal, an integral part of Bedford's fishing industry.
A branch track of 2 miles could be constructed. Single track this would cost apx 65£

Fourth, I decree that the sawmills in Mermaid and Mount Stewart begin producing large boats capable of carrying cargo posthaste.
Construction of one large cargo vessel will take some 3 weeks, with a cost of 23£. Construction has begun, and your parish has 136£ remaining.

Fifth, while I support the proposal for a bridge across the Hillsborough River between Rosebank and Charlottetown, it is imperative that this be done in such a manner that does not impede the potential flow of maritime traffic on the river east of Charlottetown. I will not approve of any bridge that does not allow a medium sized cargo ship to pass.

Sixth, I most wholeheartedly oppose any movement of the seat of the national government. Charlottetown is an ideal location. However, the parish of Bedford is willing to construct stately residences for Senators and other officials of the national government in upscale Rosebank, convenient to the national capital, but much more quiet and friendly than the city itself.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese on October 29, 2010, 07:36:56 PM
Dear Chancellor, I am so glad that you've accepted my invetation. It is my belief that this conflict over the bay can be resolved by prayer, and friendly discussion between the leaders of the parishes involved. And to the dear mayor of Charlotteville, I'm more than happy to extend the invetation to you, and I shall be happy to see you here together with the hounerable chancellor and hopefully the Duke.

Also I must most desisevly insist on a peacful end to the Halifax military offensive. The church can not accept the bloodshed of fellow Christians on this island, and I therefore urge the Director to put down his weapons and find a way to resolve this in an orderly peacful manner.

      


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 07:49:42 PM
I will have no issue with sending the local militia to Lot 7, and it has been done so immediately.  However, I am not clear on the procedures of annexation of a fellow parish, and in order to not offend the Crown, I shall wait for further instruction before taking full control of the area.

But that also leaves the fates of Lot 6.  I will resign the matter of Lot 4 to North Parish, seeing that the Countess will undoubtedly take full control of that situation herself.

I shall not move the militia into Lot 6 as of yet.  However, if given the authority by either the Government or the Crown, I will immediately annex Lot 6 as well.

It will take some hours to send the orders to the parish, and some further hours to get people into position. The "invasion" can begin in the morning.

35 citizens are registered in the Militia, how many do you wish to send? Do you wish to ask them to bring horses, and if, having none, equip them with horses?

Do you wish to issue a order of battle (IE direct the troops) or do you wish for the commanders of the militia to do that themselves?

It is best for the commanders of the Militia to take charge.   My order is to split the militia into two groups, 13 troops and my top commander will annex Lot 7.  12 troops under the second-in-command will remain on the border of Halifax and will be prepared to move into Lot 6 when the need arises.  The remaining 10 shall stay within the Parish to keep ourselves defended.

It is by my decree that until this crisis is resolved, all other projects will be put on hold in Halifax Parish.

x The Director

The troops set out at 9am sharp and took a somewhat meandering route that lead them past the largest number of farms possible.

They arrived in the main settlement at 12 noon and saw no resistance. They were greeted in the village square by residents and invited into local homes where the troops were served a hearty lunch.

They returned to the parish by 2pm and informed messengers that the lot has agreed to become a part of Halifax parish and will pay their next set of tithing to Halifax. They confirmed the man claiming to be the assemblyman for Lot 7 is indeed so.

The Game Map: http://www.ridingbyriding.ca/AMSTAR/pei_map.gif has been updated to reflect this. If you do not see it, refresh.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 29, 2010, 07:56:15 PM
A branch track of 2 miles could be constructed. Single track this would cost apx 65£

How much would a station on the existing line just north of Pownal, and a good road into Pownal cost?


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 08:13:09 PM
A quality station could cost upwards of 10-15£, however the cheapest adequate station could be as little as 2£


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 29, 2010, 08:17:23 PM
A quality station could cost upwards of 10-15£, however the cheapest adequate station could be as little as 2£

I authorize the construction of such a station and road. Something in the middle ground, £7-8 price range.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 08:20:28 PM
A quality station could cost upwards of 10-15£, however the cheapest adequate station could be as little as 2£

I authorize the construction of such a station and road. Something in the middle ground, £7-8 price range.

Construction has begun at the cost of 7£ and is expected to be finished by Friday of this week (week 2)


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 08:26:23 PM
Being sunrise on Friday, the station is now complete.

Also note I added a "table of contents" on the first page that links to posts I've made in the thread that are of note.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 08:45:07 PM
Assembly.
I, the Right Honorable Chancellor of the Parish of Bedford, am greatly displeased that the provincial government continues to deny Bedford's rightful jurisdiction over Governor's Island and the surrounding territorial waters. These territorial waters are an integral part of Bedford, yet the provincial government continues to ignore the plight of our budding shipping industry. A stately residence in Charlottetown would be more than suitable for the provincial government's needs.

As Mayor of Charlottetown, I must give my thanks to you for recognizing the prestige of my city. While I do sympathize with your argument, as Charlottetown's maritime industries are similarly nascent, I believe the correspondence from the Crown on the issue demonstrates a problem does not exist as such.

This territorial dispute does raise another issue, however; I assume the vessels that berth at Charlottetown have a right of passage through the "territorial" waters of neighboring parishes, do they not? Raising this issue of coastal control gives me concern that rural parishes may seek to abuse their power and cause duress to the industries of our fair capital city. In particular, I was perturbed by your seemingly veiled threat to patrol the Hillsborough River with heavily armed vessels! Do understand that Charlottetown is the heart of our island, both culturally and economically. Any action you take that weakens my city will weaken you as a result. I do hope that cool heads will prevail.



In addition, as Mayor of the Queen's County Seat, I would like to suggest a county-wide conference regarding the future status of Charlotte Parish. Reeve Lance's utter negligence towards his duties is most striking.

Many assemblymen from the extremities of the island feel that Hillsborough Bay should be National property.

Many assemblymen from Queens County do not feel the need for any special county convention.


The Most Honorable and Majestic homelycooking, Provost of Grenville, offers his salutations to the various senators and leaders of the parishes of God's most glorious island. It is his sincere hope that through common cause we may gain lasting victory over the deleterious effects of ignorance, famine and insularity.

Taking up the major causes of concern for the good people of Grenville, then, the Provost wishes to express his support for the proposal that the administrative functions of the Government of Prince Edward Island be moved to the town of Breadalbane. It is in the interest of the entire island to have a capital located in a central location such as Lot 67 of Grenville, and the Provost is willing to offer any and all support to efforts moving in such a direction.

Second, it is imperative that the industrious yeoman farmers of Grenville be permitted a more convenient outlet for the sundry agricultural products of the parish. The Provost expresses his indignancy that the most fertile parish on the island has no outlet to the sea, and believes that the construction of a wharf and new rail line along the northern coast of the island running from Princeton to Charlottetown and passing through New London, Cavendish and Rustico would allow trade to flow more freely, permitting a newfound prosperity to pervade the island.

Third, the Provost is willing to allow the extant rail line currently passing through Hunter River to bypass the town and proceed straight from North Wiltshire to Breadalbane, in exchange for the aforementioned coastal link and necessary provisions for the economic well-being of Hunter River.

The Provost invites all other noble leaders of this most glorious island to confer with him so that the best possible solutions for our people may be arrived at.

Many assemblymen from west of Summerside are very supportive of proposals to move the Capitol, however, those from east of Summerside are generally opposed.

The assembly has voted to "examine" the costs of a new rail line.




First off, allow me to declare that my city is the only suitable location for our nation's capitol complex. We are the economic and cultural heart of our island; I mean no disrespect to the honorable Provost or the people of Breadalbane, but a farming community is simply not the proper location for our capital. Charlotte Town is not simply a parish, but a mighty city as well, and thus the only location with adequate infrastructure and facilities to be our nation's home.

The argument has also been made that Breadalbane is appropriate as a "central" location. Central for who? The majority of our island's parishes are closer to Charlotte Town. We are not only the social, cultural, and economic heart of Prince Edward Island, we are in fact the geographic heart as well. I have nothing but respect for all our island's leaders and citizens, but this issue is a matter of principle in which I will not compromise.



I must raise another issue- my city is grossly underrepresented in the national assembly. We have, for example, more citizens than either Egmont or East Parish but half the representatives.  As a matter of fairness, decency, and justice, I must demand that the people of Charlotte Town receive equal representation in our nation's legislature.



Regarding other issues that have been raised, I note my continued unwavering support for greater connectivity and trade amongst all parishes. I support a bridge across the Hillsborough River, the right of Winsloe residents (and all others, for that matter) to work within Charlotte Town, the construction of more whorfs across the island, and a national investment in larger transport vessels capable of carrying cargo. Economic ties make us all stronger.



On a closing note, I urge that the situation in the west be resolved with tact and caution- no man wants bloodshed to result.

I hope that we can all share our lives peacefully without undue dispute, so that greater prosperity may be shared by all.
There is some division within the assembly as to how to dole out seats. Small lots do not want to be left un-represented. The assembly suggests the Senate look into the issue.

The Chancellor's rhetoric is reasonable and well informed, and the Provost does not feel that the relocation of the island's capitol to Breadalbane needs to be a critical issue of concern, as economic inequities are much more relevant to the current condition of the island. After all, the good people of Grenville Parish care about the price of their wheat and barley, not obscure political machinations. It is the Provost's desire to facilitate trade between the people of our parishes, and would prefer the town of Breadalbane to be a prosperous economic trading city rather than an admittedly small (in population), landlocked political capitol.

The Provost wishes to propose that any funding provided by the national coffers be equitably distributed among the parishes. As such, he would support a bridge spanning the Hillsborough River if it were contained in an omnibus transportation package that adequately addresses transportation deficiencies across the entire island. This package should include the Provost's proposal to re-route the railway passing through Hunter River, as the dangerously steep grade on the only link between the island's East and West threatens commerce between the parishes. 



The assembly has voted to examine the possibility of a bridge.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 29, 2010, 08:50:02 PM
Over the weekend I hono(u)r my appointment with the Bishop. I tithe $30 to the church (from my own personal fortune, not from the coffers of Bedford Parish).


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 29, 2010, 08:51:07 PM
Extending rail, single-track to the north side of the Island near Cavendish would cost about 1€ per mile, and need to be 20 miles long. Given the length there may need to be a by-pass section of track built as dual track which would increase the cost.

The cost of a single-track rail bridge across the Hillsborough river could be as high as 5-7€


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 29, 2010, 08:54:15 PM
Has the survey team returned yet from Bedford Bay?

The cost of a single-track rail bridge across the Hillsborough river could be as high as 5-7€

Does that price take into account my requirement that medium-sized cargo ships be able to pass under it?


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 29, 2010, 09:29:43 PM
Many assemblymen from the extremities of the island feel that Hillsborough Bay should be National property.

Many assemblymen from Queens County do not feel the need for any special county convention.

Many assemblymen from west of Summerside are very supportive of proposals to move the Capitol, however, those from east of Summerside are generally opposed.

The assembly has voted to "examine" the costs of a new rail line.

There is some division within the assembly as to how to dole out seats. Small lots do not want to be left un-represented. The assembly suggests the Senate look into the issue.

The assembly has voted to examine the possibility of a bridge.

1. On the question of Hillsborough Bay, I support the status quo. The current division between the parishes of Bedford, Hillsborough, and St. John is adequate.

2. On the question of a county convention, I feel that it would be the most expedient and fairest way to resolve the controversy over Charlotte Parish.

3. On the question of the seat of national government, I oppose any measure that would move the capital to any place other than Charlottetown.

4. Before any decision is made on the issue of a new rail line, I must inform everyone that the Parish of Bedford is planning to begin work on a ferry system for the northern part of the island. A settlement will be built on Bedford Bay, which will be the hub of the ferry service. The plans include service to Morell, Rustico, Cavendish, Princeton, and Alberton. The ships used will allow for passengers and light cargo.

5. On the question of apportionment of Assembly seats, I support increasing the size of the Assembly to ensure every Parish and City is fairly represented. I suggest that the city of Charlottetown be divided into wards for the purposes of Assembly seats, much in the same manner as Parishes are divided into Lots.

6. As stated before, I am generally in support of a bridge over the Hillsborough River, but I require that medium-sized cargo ships be able to pass under it. I will not support any plans for a bridge that do not allow for this requirement.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Sewer on October 29, 2010, 10:21:17 PM
It is still of the opinion of the Duke of Hillsborough that Hillsborough Bay should belong to Hillsborough.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 29, 2010, 10:45:46 PM
It is clear that the Duke of Hillsborough not only has not refined his opinion on the issue of Hillsborough Bay, but he has also refused the invitation of the spiritual leader of our people, His Grace the Bishop of St. David, revealing himself not only to be an intransigent, but an infidel as well. I pray for his soul.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Bacon King on October 29, 2010, 11:54:28 PM
I believe that ideally Hillsborough Bay should be nationally shared territory, but the status quo is entirely acceptable as long as the right of passage is not infringed. It is clearly apparent that the Duke of Hillsborough is entirely out of line on this issue. I am also, frankly, appalled at his apparent rejection of the honorable Bishop's mediation. If the Duke does not change course rapidly, I feel that Hillsborough's lack of sane leadership must be rectified in any way possible, lest innocent lives be lost to his aggressive actions.

Also, on an unrelated note, I feel that my call for a County-wide convention was a result of my (then) lack of information regarding Charlotte Parish's status. I believe there is no need for any such convention.

A few proposals:

1. To prevent ambiguity in our economy, that the currency exchange be specifically defined by the national government, at a rate of $100 to £1, £33 to €1, and $3300 to €1.

2. To foster trade amongst the parishes, that the national government shall comprehensively assist communities across the island to build new docks, to improve rail infrastructure and access where needed, to expand ferry services, to construct a small fleet of cargo vessels, and to bridge rivers where needed. Specifics of this "omnibus trade improvement" may be determined after the acceptance of its general need.

3. To ensure a proper business climate for our merchants, that a national bank be established in the capital city, and with branches in Princeton and Georgetown or nearby areas.

Lastly, an issue for the Senate alone, since the Assembly forwarded it to us:

4. I propose that all parishes receive equal representation in the assembly, and that they shall each have one representative per 250 citizens, rounded. Distribution of representatives among a parish's lots shall be the responsibility of the parish government (with the expectation that it is done in an unbiased manner).


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Sewer on October 30, 2010, 12:07:55 AM
The Duke of Hillsborough is appalled by Mayor Bacon's threats and begins to start a militia to defend himself.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Bacon King on October 30, 2010, 12:11:06 AM
Also, I'd like to announce my fine city is building two cargo vessels. We're also ordering two specialized stagecoaches for a city fire department.

Also, my town government is prepared to spend €2.5 or its exchange equivalent towards the construction of a bridge into Lot 48. We would expect funding from Bedford Parish as well as the national government, of course.

We're also spending a bit on improving city streets, adding park space, maybe a few statues; basically, general measures to improve the city's prestige.

Last, we've streamlined procedures required to start/run/own a business or commercial property within the city. I assume plenty of undeveloped land still exists; allow some of it to be sold to prospective buyers.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Bacon King on October 30, 2010, 12:12:27 AM
The Duke of Hillsborough is appalled by Mayor Bacon's threats and begins to start a militia to defend himself.

I seek no conflict with you.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on October 30, 2010, 12:46:06 AM
By the order of the Right Honourable Director of Halifax, this State of Emergency is hereby ended.

I wish to make a formal declaration of open development of a "main street highway" so to say within Halifax Parish, beginning in Cape Wolfe in Lot 7, connecting Dublane, Hebron, Coleman, and ending in Foxley River.

I would like to create an exploratory committee as to the idea of the wharf.  This committee will determine it's feasibility, impact on the Halifax economy, and the surrounding enviornment, both short term and long term.

I would also like to announce the creation of a Habour in Egmont Bay, at the mouth of the Percival River.  Construction is to begin immediately on Harbour facilities and components for one patrol boat and two cargo ships are currently being produced in Ellersie and Dublane.

x The Director


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 30, 2010, 12:50:54 AM
The recent actions of the Duke of Hillsborough reflect a hostile intent. To that end, in my official capacity as Chancellor of Bedford, I decree the following:

1. Fishermen and other sailing vessels under the jurisdiction of Bedford Parish are instructed to keep out of the territorial waters of Hillsborough Parish.

2. The militia of the Parish of Bedford is to be reallocated in the following manner:

6 Naval Troops on 3 boats, stationed in Rosebank.
10 Cavalry (horsemen), stationed in Tracadie.
14 Infantry, stationed in Rosebank.
5 Infantry, stationed in Mount Stewart
This allocation is to remain in effect until further notice.

3. The militia will undergo a recruitment drive in Rosebank, Mount Stewart, and Tracadie. Any recruits in Mount Stewart in excess of five will be billeted to Rosebank. Any recruits in Tracadie will be made Cavalrymen. I stress that volunteers only will be recruited. This is not a draft.

Be advised that any attempt by the armed forces of Hillsborough to enter Bedford or Charlottetown will be viewed as a hostile action, and the militia of Bedford is prepared to defend both itself and its neighbours for the cause of righteousness.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on October 30, 2010, 12:53:03 AM
As I have observed the conflict between the Chancellor and the Duke, I cannot bear to witness my kinsmen rip each other apart.  We must stand together as one nation.

I hereby request a conference between the two within neutral ground (preferably the city of Cape Wolfe) and I offer my services as mediator.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 30, 2010, 01:02:57 AM
As I have observed the conflict between the Chancellor and the Duke, I cannot bear to witness my kinsmen rip each other apart.  We must stand together as one nation.

I hereby request a conference between the two within neutral ground (preferably the city of Cape Wolfe) and I offer my services as mediator.

I am willing to attempt mediation. I point out that I have already attempted mediation once before, and the Duke refused to attend. As there are several pressing matters to attend to in Rosebank, I will not commit to attend unless the Duke does likewise. And I reject the backwater village of Cape Wolfe as a suitable location for the negotiations.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on October 30, 2010, 01:07:57 AM
As I have observed the conflict between the Chancellor and the Duke, I cannot bear to witness my kinsmen rip each other apart.  We must stand together as one nation.

I hereby request a conference between the two within neutral ground (preferably the city of Cape Wolfe) and I offer my services as mediator.

I am willing to attempt mediation. I point out that I have already attempted mediation once before, and the Duke refused to attend. As there are several pressing matters to attend to in Rosebank, I will not commit to attend unless the Duke does likewise. And I reject the backwater village of Cape Wolfe as a suitable location for the negotiations.

I will brush off that offense good sir.  However Cape Wolfe is a small, kind town which has shown exemplary patriotism and unity, and does not deserve such an insult.  But, I am willing to offer the capital of Ellersie, and if not that, then I will negotiate with the Captain for a conference in Princeton.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Sewer on October 30, 2010, 01:11:36 AM
I would be glad to meet in the great town of Cape Wolfe.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 30, 2010, 01:13:31 AM
As I have observed the conflict between the Chancellor and the Duke, I cannot bear to witness my kinsmen rip each other apart.  We must stand together as one nation.

I hereby request a conference between the two within neutral ground (preferably the city of Cape Wolfe) and I offer my services as mediator.

I am willing to attempt mediation. I point out that I have already attempted mediation once before, and the Duke refused to attend. As there are several pressing matters to attend to in Rosebank, I will not commit to attend unless the Duke does likewise. And I reject the backwater village of Cape Wolfe as a suitable location for the negotiations.

I will brush off that offense good sir.  However Cape Wolfe is a small, kind town which has shown exemplary patriotism and unity, and does not deserve such an insult.  But, I am willing to offer the capital of Ellersie, and if not that, then I will negotiate with the Captain for a conference in Princeton.

Ellersie would be suitable.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on October 30, 2010, 01:14:45 AM
I would be glad to meet in the great town of Cape Wolfe.

Would you be willing to settle for Ellersie?  If you wish, I will take you on a tour through Halifax Parish afterwards of our work in progress, "Main Street", culminating in a Poutine Bar in Cape Wolfe.:)


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 30, 2010, 02:26:07 AM
Has the survey team returned yet from Bedford Bay?

The cost of a single-track rail bridge across the Hillsborough river could be as high as 5-7€

Does that price take into account my requirement that medium-sized cargo ships be able to pass under it?
It dies (without it, it would be cheaper)

Many assemblymen from the extremities of the island feel that Hillsborough Bay should be National property.

Many assemblymen from Queens County do not feel the need for any special county convention.

Many assemblymen from west of Summerside are very supportive of proposals to move the Capitol, however, those from east of Summerside are generally opposed.

The assembly has voted to "examine" the costs of a new rail line.

There is some division within the assembly as to how to dole out seats. Small lots do not want to be left un-represented. The assembly suggests the Senate look into the issue.

The assembly has voted to examine the possibility of a bridge.

1. On the question of Hillsborough Bay, I support the status quo. The current division between the parishes of Bedford, Hillsborough, and St. John is adequate.

2. On the question of a county convention, I feel that it would be the most expedient and fairest way to resolve the controversy over Charlotte Parish.

3. On the question of the seat of national government, I oppose any measure that would move the capital to any place other than Charlottetown.

4. Before any decision is made on the issue of a new rail line, I must inform everyone that the Parish of Bedford is planning to begin work on a ferry system for the northern part of the island. A settlement will be built on Bedford Bay, which will be the hub of the ferry service. The plans include service to Morell, Rustico, Cavendish, Princeton, and Alberton. The ships used will allow for passengers and light cargo.

5. On the question of apportionment of Assembly seats, I support increasing the size of the Assembly to ensure every Parish and City is fairly represented. I suggest that the city of Charlottetown be divided into wards for the purposes of Assembly seats, much in the same manner as Parishes are divided into Lots.

6. As stated before, I am generally in support of a bridge over the Hillsborough River, but I require that medium-sized cargo ships be able to pass under it. I will not support any plans for a bridge that do not allow for this requirement.

1 - Your assemblymen are voting in this track.

2 - Same as above, but, it does not make you any friends over in Charlotte

3 - Same as #1

4 - Noted

5 - The assembly will investigate this.

6 - Same as #1


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 30, 2010, 02:28:10 AM
I believe that ideally Hillsborough Bay should be nationally shared territory, but the status quo is entirely acceptable as long as the right of passage is not infringed. It is clearly apparent that the Duke of Hillsborough is entirely out of line on this issue. I am also, frankly, appalled at his apparent rejection of the honorable Bishop's mediation. If the Duke does not change course rapidly, I feel that Hillsborough's lack of sane leadership must be rectified in any way possible, lest innocent lives be lost to his aggressive actions.

Also, on an unrelated note, I feel that my call for a County-wide convention was a result of my (then) lack of information regarding Charlotte Parish's status. I believe there is no need for any such convention.

A few proposals:

1. To prevent ambiguity in our economy, that the currency exchange be specifically defined by the national government, at a rate of $100 to £1, £33 to €1, and $3300 to €1.

2. To foster trade amongst the parishes, that the national government shall comprehensively assist communities across the island to build new docks, to improve rail infrastructure and access where needed, to expand ferry services, to construct a small fleet of cargo vessels, and to bridge rivers where needed. Specifics of this "omnibus trade improvement" may be determined after the acceptance of its general need.

3. To ensure a proper business climate for our merchants, that a national bank be established in the capital city, and with branches in Princeton and Georgetown or nearby areas.

Lastly, an issue for the Senate alone, since the Assembly forwarded it to us:

4. I propose that all parishes receive equal representation in the assembly, and that they shall each have one representative per 250 citizens, rounded. Distribution of representatives among a parish's lots shall be the responsibility of the parish government (with the expectation that it is done in an unbiased manner).
1 - The assembly forwards this decision to the Senate

2 - The assembly proposes to fund 50% of all wharfs, rail lines, and such improvements, and wishes to seek senate approval.

3 - What would this bank do?


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 30, 2010, 02:29:13 AM
Also, I'd like to announce my fine city is building two cargo vessels. We're also ordering two specialized stagecoaches for a city fire department.

Also, my town government is prepared to spend €2.5 or its exchange equivalent towards the construction of a bridge into Lot 48. We would expect funding from Bedford Parish as well as the national government, of course.

We're also spending a bit on improving city streets, adding park space, maybe a few statues; basically, general measures to improve the city's prestige.

Last, we've streamlined procedures required to start/run/own a business or commercial property within the city. I assume plenty of undeveloped land still exists; allow some of it to be sold to prospective buyers.

I will add the vessels to your budget


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 30, 2010, 02:30:47 AM
The recent actions of the Duke of Hillsborough reflect a hostile intent. To that end, in my official capacity as Chancellor of Bedford, I decree the following:

1. Fishermen and other sailing vessels under the jurisdiction of Bedford Parish are instructed to keep out of the territorial waters of Hillsborough Parish.

2. The militia of the Parish of Bedford is to be reallocated in the following manner:

6 Naval Troops on 3 boats, stationed in Rosebank.
10 Cavalry (horsemen), stationed in Tracadie.
14 Infantry, stationed in Rosebank.
5 Infantry, stationed in Mount Stewart
This allocation is to remain in effect until further notice.

3. The militia will undergo a recruitment drive in Rosebank, Mount Stewart, and Tracadie. Any recruits in Mount Stewart in excess of five will be billeted to Rosebank. Any recruits in Tracadie will be made Cavalrymen. I stress that volunteers only will be recruited. This is not a draft.

Be advised that any attempt by the armed forces of Hillsborough to enter Bedford or Charlottetown will be viewed as a hostile action, and the militia of Bedford is prepared to defend both itself and its neighbours for the cause of righteousness.

Do you wish to start funding a standing army?


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 30, 2010, 02:31:11 AM
By the order of the Right Honourable Director of Halifax, this State of Emergency is hereby ended.

I wish to make a formal declaration of open development of a "main street highway" so to say within Halifax Parish, beginning in Cape Wolfe in Lot 7, connecting Dublane, Hebron, Coleman, and ending in Foxley River.

I would like to create an exploratory committee as to the idea of the wharf.  This committee will determine it's feasibility, impact on the Halifax economy, and the surrounding enviornment, both short term and long term.

I would also like to announce the creation of a Habour in Egmont Bay, at the mouth of the Percival River.  Construction is to begin immediately on Harbour facilities and components for one patrol boat and two cargo ships are currently being produced in Ellersie and Dublane.

x The Director

I will get back to you shortly on all of these


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 30, 2010, 02:34:24 AM
The recent actions of the Duke of Hillsborough reflect a hostile intent. To that end, in my official capacity as Chancellor of Bedford, I decree the following:

1. Fishermen and other sailing vessels under the jurisdiction of Bedford Parish are instructed to keep out of the territorial waters of Hillsborough Parish.

2. The militia of the Parish of Bedford is to be reallocated in the following manner:

6 Naval Troops on 3 boats, stationed in Rosebank.
10 Cavalry (horsemen), stationed in Tracadie.
14 Infantry, stationed in Rosebank.
5 Infantry, stationed in Mount Stewart
This allocation is to remain in effect until further notice.

3. The militia will undergo a recruitment drive in Rosebank, Mount Stewart, and Tracadie. Any recruits in Mount Stewart in excess of five will be billeted to Rosebank. Any recruits in Tracadie will be made Cavalrymen. I stress that volunteers only will be recruited. This is not a draft.

Be advised that any attempt by the armed forces of Hillsborough to enter Bedford or Charlottetown will be viewed as a hostile action, and the militia of Bedford is prepared to defend both itself and its neighbours for the cause of righteousness.

Do you wish to start funding a standing army?

Pending the results of negotiations with the Duke of Hillsborough, decree 3 above is temporarily on hold. Decrees 1 and 2 remain in effect.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 30, 2010, 02:44:30 AM
If you are stationing troops however it implies you will need them for a time, and a militia is normally private citizens that are called up to do just a few things for a short amount of time.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 30, 2010, 03:13:37 AM
If you are stationing troops however it implies you will need them for a time, and a militia is normally private citizens that are called up to do just a few things for a short amount of time.

Well, right now they're just being called up to stand at the ready in case of attack. I will fund them if necessary, however.



On the question of apportionment to the Assembly, I propose the following changes to body of the Assembly:

An increase in size to 200 members, to be apportioned as follows according to the most recent census figures:

Bedford Parish: 14 members
Charlotte Parish: 17 members
City of Charlottetown: 11 members
East Parish: 10 members
Edgmont Parish: 9 members
City of Georgetown: 4 members
Grenville Parish: 15 members
Halifax Parish: 11 members
Hillsborough Parish: 13 members
North Parish: 10 members
City of Princeton: 1 member
Richmond Parish: 21 members
St. Andrew Parish: 10 members
St. David Parish: 17 members
St. George Parish: 15 members
St. John Parish: 10 members
St. Patrick Parish: 12 members

This apportionment takes into account Halifax Parish's recent acquisition of Lot 7, and counts Lot 7's population as part of the population of Halifax Parish.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 30, 2010, 03:43:45 AM
A friend from another forum wishes to play. Seeing the kings county area parishes are not as active as others, I've told him he can be St. George as General Red. I will relay any of his orders until his account gets approved here at the atlas.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 30, 2010, 03:56:01 AM
If you are stationing troops however it implies you will need them for a time, and a militia is normally private citizens that are called up to do just a few things for a short amount of time.

Well, right now they're just being called up to stand at the ready in case of attack. I will fund them if necessary, however.



On the question of apportionment to the Assembly, I propose the following changes to body of the Assembly:

An increase in size to 200 members, to be apportioned as follows according to the most recent census figures:

Bedford Parish: 14 members
Charlotte Parish: 17 members
City of Charlottetown: 11 members
East Parish: 10 members
Edgmont Parish: 9 members
City of Georgetown: 4 members
Grenville Parish: 15 members
Halifax Parish: 11 members
Hillsborough Parish: 13 members
North Parish: 10 members
City of Princeton: 1 member
Richmond Parish: 21 members
St. Andrew Parish: 10 members
St. David Parish: 17 members
St. George Parish: 15 members
St. John Parish: 10 members
St. Patrick Parish: 12 members

This apportionment takes into account Halifax Parish's recent acquisition of Lot 7, and counts Lot 7's population as part of the population of Halifax Parish.

Some guffaws at the proposal, others are concerned about the removal of lots from the counting.

A proposal from a member of Lot 17 suggests that the number of members from Lot 17 be increased to 4, and from Charlottetown be increased to 4, while Lot 32 is increased to 3. Beyond this he proposes that each "Parish" would be limited to a minimum of 5 members, with Charlottetown being counted as a Parish for these purposes.

This would result in an increase for members from Charlottetown from 3 to 5, in Richmond from 8 to 9, and in Charlotte from 7 to 8, resulting in a 99 member assembly.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 30, 2010, 04:00:23 AM
The above has raised concerns about what to do with the other two "County Capitols".

Members from Prince County feel Princeton is
Quote
A pathetic excuse for a Capitol that does not even have an adequate courthouse, rather the leader's own kitchen is used for this purpose, weather or not his wife is cooking stew
They feel that Princeton should be downgraded. Some feel that it should be annexed into nearby Lot 18, but others point to sea rights and historical connections across the bay to Lot 14 in Richmond. Assemblymen for both St. David and Richmond are trying to use these facts to lay claim over Princeton, while the leader of Princeton is not impressed at all by the discussion.

Members from King county are more satisfied with Georgetown; being a larger centre it is seen as adequate for it's job as county seat.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese on October 30, 2010, 04:56:50 AM
I would be glad to meet in the great town of Cape Wolfe.

What? So my church isn't good enough for you, but you'll go to some peasant village even further away from you. This is most displeasing. We are not amused. I hope the Duke has a very good explanation for his rude behaviour towards the church, as well as his hostile behaviour towards his neighbours. Confess your sins Duke, and repent. I will pray for your soul.

I'd also like to send my congratulations to the hounarble Director of Halifax, and congratulate him on the fact that his annexation was calm, peacful, and ended in bloodshed. God bless your heart dear director. 


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 30, 2010, 05:13:14 AM
By the order of the Right Honourable Director of Halifax, this State of Emergency is hereby ended.

I wish to make a formal declaration of open development of a "main street highway" so to say within Halifax Parish, beginning in Cape Wolfe in Lot 7, connecting Dublane, Hebron, Coleman, and ending in Foxley River.

I would like to create an exploratory committee as to the idea of the wharf.  This committee will determine it's feasibility, impact on the Halifax economy, and the surrounding enviornment, both short term and long term.

I would also like to announce the creation of a Habour in Egmont Bay, at the mouth of the Percival River.  Construction is to begin immediately on Harbour facilities and components for one patrol boat and two cargo ships are currently being produced in Ellersie and Dublane.

x The Director

I will get back to you shortly on all of these

A "highway" could be created, but there is nothing to run on it. Increasing the road to the highest possibly qualify over that distance would cost about 5,000$

A wharf could be constructed at Cape Wolfe for the cost of 7£

There is no suitable location for a wharf in that area of egmont bay.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 30, 2010, 05:14:18 AM
Bedford Bay

After an exhaustive search of the north shore, reports are the the only location within the Parish that is suitable for a wharf on the north shore is in Lot 37, east of the Sand Bars.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese on October 30, 2010, 05:22:10 AM

Some feel that it should be annexed into nearby Lot 18, but others point to sea rights and historical connections across the bay to Lot 14 in Richmond. Assemblymen for both St. David and Richmond are trying to use these facts to lay claim over Princeton, while the leader of Princeton is not impressed at all by the discussion.

Although I support Princeton's continued indipendance if they so wish, if the city were to be intigrated to another parish, St. David would be the only reasonable alternative. Princeton is after all connected to St. David by land, while Richmond is separated from the city by the Richmond Bay. The hounarble leaders of Richmond must therefor see that a unification between the city and richmond would not be practical. I'm also sure, that such an alliance would be most unliked by our Lord and God.

I'd also like to note, that next to Princeton, the natural choice for County Capital would be Kensington, as it is already the centre of the Christian Church in this country, and a highly developed town with century old history.  


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 30, 2010, 07:03:06 AM
A member of your church approaches and asks you to build a large cathedral in Kensington.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese on October 30, 2010, 08:26:11 AM
A member of your church approaches and asks you to build a large cathedral in Kensington.

How much would such a construction cost the church approxemetly?


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: homelycooking on October 30, 2010, 09:12:45 AM
The Provost authorizes the dispatch of surveyors to the North Coast of Grenville Parish for the purpose of determining whether a wharf may be built on Grenville Bay and the cost and placement of a highway that would take the place of a North Coast link heretofore proposed.

The Provost wishes to thank the Chancellor for his magnanimous offer of a ferry service along the north coast of the island. However, the people of Grenville are averse to such a mode of transportation, as they fear the loss of their produce to the storms and vicious currents which plague the northern seas. They prefer the construction of railroads, or at the least good highways, to aid the transport of their goods.

The Provost is appalled at the disservice Reeve Lance has done to his Charlotte Parish. He wishes to make it known throughout the parish that an active parish government such as his or the Chancellor of Bedford's or the Duke of Hillsborough's is better equipped to deal with the local concerns of the people than a hermit who is necessarily disconnected, by the nature of his residence, from the needs of his parishoners.

Furthermore, the town of Rustico, located along the north coast, is closer to the Grenville Parish town of Cavendish than any other Charlotte Parish town, and can be more easily linked with Breadalbane than the town of Cornwall. If Lot 24 is willing to join with Grenville Parish, then the Provost is willing to treat the people of the Lot as equals and advocate accordingly for its welfare as a recluse cannot do. The Provost therefore approves of the Chancellor's plan to reappropriate the lots of Charlotte for the purpose of better governance.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on October 30, 2010, 10:41:40 AM
I'd also like to send my congratulations to the hounarble Director of Halifax, and congratulate him on the fact that his annexation was calm, peacful, and ended in bloodshed. God bless your heart dear director. 

Ended in bloodshed?  I don't know what you're smoking.;)

By the order of the Right Honourable Director of Halifax, this State of Emergency is hereby ended.

I wish to make a formal declaration of open development of a "main street highway" so to say within Halifax Parish, beginning in Cape Wolfe in Lot 7, connecting Dublane, Hebron, Coleman, and ending in Foxley River.

I would like to create an exploratory committee as to the idea of the wharf.  This committee will determine it's feasibility, impact on the Halifax economy, and the surrounding enviornment, both short term and long term.

I would also like to announce the creation of a Habour in Egmont Bay, at the mouth of the Percival River.  Construction is to begin immediately on Harbour facilities and components for one patrol boat and two cargo ships are currently being produced in Ellersie and Dublane.

x The Director

I will get back to you shortly on all of these

A "highway" could be created, but there is nothing to run on it. Increasing the road to the highest possibly qualify over that distance would cost about 5,000$

A wharf could be constructed at Cape Wolfe for the cost of 7£

There is no suitable location for a wharf in that area of egmont bay.

Well i would at the very least like to build upon the road.  Would I be able to get away with $3000 by flattening it out and then paving it using stones?

This wharf will then be put under construction.

Are there any suitable locations for one in the area that won't conflict with my good friend from Richmond?


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese on October 30, 2010, 11:00:53 AM
I'd also like to send my congratulations to the hounarble Director of Halifax, and congratulate him on the fact that his annexation was calm, peacful, and ended in bloodshed. God bless your heart dear director. 

Ended in bloodshed?  I don't know what you're smoking.;)

Oh good Lord, ended in no bloodshed. Sorry that's what I was suppouse to say.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Bacon King on October 30, 2010, 01:05:53 PM
How much would a wagon or stagecoach cost? How many roads Are fit for their travel?

Also, how is my city's cathedral?


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 30, 2010, 03:53:02 PM
Bedford Bay

After an exhaustive search of the north shore, reports are the the only location within the Parish that is suitable for a wharf on the north shore is in Lot 37, east of the Sand Bars.

Bugger. I suppose that means that ships would be unable to enter the northern seas?

I will be visiting the "rural" areas of Lots 35 and 36, specifically the southern part of Lot 35 and the northern part of Lot 36, with the intent to address the specific concerns of citizens of these Lots. I suggest to these citizens a possible adjustment of the boundaries of these Lots, with Lot 35 consisting of the area north of the Hillsborough River and Lot 36 consisting of the area south of the river. If I am met with a positive response, I propose these adjustments to the Senate.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 30, 2010, 04:12:55 PM
I agree with the Honourable Provost of Grenville that Reeve Lance's gross negligence in the administration of his Parish can no longer be ignored. The good citizens of Charlotte Parish deserve better. As Chancellor of Bedford, I offer to the citizens of Lot 34, should they be willing to join Bedford Parish, the same service, courtesy, and competent administration that the citizens of Lot 7 were offered by the Honourable Director of Halifax, and indeed the same as I offer my own citizens.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 30, 2010, 06:57:50 PM
A member of your church approaches and asks you to build a large cathedral in Kensington.

How much would such a construction cost the church approxemetly?

I will respond in a few hours (I just woke up)

The Provost authorizes the dispatch of surveyors to the North Coast of Grenville Parish for the purpose of determining whether a wharf may be built on Grenville Bay and the cost and placement of a highway that would take the place of a North Coast link heretofore proposed.

The Provost wishes to thank the Chancellor for his magnanimous offer of a ferry service along the north coast of the island. However, the people of Grenville are averse to such a mode of transportation, as they fear the loss of their produce to the storms and vicious currents which plague the northern seas. They prefer the construction of railroads, or at the least good highways, to aid the transport of their goods.

The Provost is appalled at the disservice Reeve Lance has done to his Charlotte Parish. He wishes to make it known throughout the parish that an active parish government such as his or the Chancellor of Bedford's or the Duke of Hillsborough's is better equipped to deal with the local concerns of the people than a hermit who is necessarily disconnected, by the nature of his residence, from the needs of his parishoners.

Furthermore, the town of Rustico, located along the north coast, is closer to the Grenville Parish town of Cavendish than any other Charlotte Parish town, and can be more easily linked with Breadalbane than the town of Cornwall. If Lot 24 is willing to join with Grenville Parish, then the Provost is willing to treat the people of the Lot as equals and advocate accordingly for its welfare as a recluse cannot do. The Provost therefore approves of the Chancellor's plan to reappropriate the lots of Charlotte for the purpose of better governance.

Assemblymen from Charlotte note that while Grenville and Bedford can only criticize, that Charlottetown has proven that they are "more than a friend"


I'd also like to send my congratulations to the hounarble Director of Halifax, and congratulate him on the fact that his annexation was calm, peacful, and ended in bloodshed. God bless your heart dear director. 

Ended in bloodshed?  I don't know what you're smoking.;)

By the order of the Right Honourable Director of Halifax, this State of Emergency is hereby ended.

I wish to make a formal declaration of open development of a "main street highway" so to say within Halifax Parish, beginning in Cape Wolfe in Lot 7, connecting Dublane, Hebron, Coleman, and ending in Foxley River.

I would like to create an exploratory committee as to the idea of the wharf.  This committee will determine it's feasibility, impact on the Halifax economy, and the surrounding enviornment, both short term and long term.

I would also like to announce the creation of a Habour in Egmont Bay, at the mouth of the Percival River.  Construction is to begin immediately on Harbour facilities and components for one patrol boat and two cargo ships are currently being produced in Ellersie and Dublane.

x The Director

I will get back to you shortly on all of these

A "highway" could be created, but there is nothing to run on it. Increasing the road to the highest possibly qualify over that distance would cost about 5,000$

A wharf could be constructed at Cape Wolfe for the cost of 7£

There is no suitable location for a wharf in that area of egmont bay.

Well i would at the very least like to build upon the road.  Would I be able to get away with $3000 by flattening it out and then paving it using stones?

This wharf will then be put under construction.

Are there any suitable locations for one in the area that won't conflict with my good friend from Richmond?


The cost is for a gravel road, 3,000$ may not provide for full year-round cover.

As for a wharf you will need to be more specific.

How much would a wagon or stagecoach cost? How many roads Are fit for their travel?

Also, how is my city's cathedral?

A coach could be constructed, but based on size (one horse or two) will be different costs.

Each town has a church, Charlottetown has many.

Bedford Bay

After an exhaustive search of the north shore, reports are the the only location within the Parish that is suitable for a wharf on the north shore is in Lot 37, east of the Sand Bars.

Bugger. I suppose that means that ships would be unable to enter the northern seas?

I will be visiting the "rural" areas of Lots 35 and 36, specifically the southern part of Lot 35 and the northern part of Lot 36, with the intent to address the specific concerns of citizens of these Lots. I suggest to these citizens a possible adjustment of the boundaries of these Lots, with Lot 35 consisting of the area north of the Hillsborough River and Lot 36 consisting of the area south of the river. If I am met with a positive response, I propose these adjustments to the Senate.

You can build a wharf on the northern seas, but only at the point noted.

Members of both lots think a re-adjustment would be a good idea, and wish for you to give the "go ahead"

I agree with the Honourable Provost of Grenville that Reeve Lance's gross negligence in the administration of his Parish can no longer be ignored. The good citizens of Charlotte Parish deserve better. As Chancellor of Bedford, I offer to the citizens of Lot 34, should they be willing to join Bedford Parish, the same service, courtesy, and competent administration that the citizens of Lot 7 were offered by the Honourable Director of Halifax, and indeed the same as I offer my own citizens.

Reports are that members of Lot 34 would "Rather join with Charlottetown" than your parish.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Bacon King on October 30, 2010, 07:05:51 PM
I agree with the Honourable Provost of Grenville that Reeve Lance's gross negligence in the administration of his Parish can no longer be ignored. The good citizens of Charlotte Parish deserve better. As Chancellor of Bedford, I offer to the citizens of Lot 34, should they be willing to join Bedford Parish, the same service, courtesy, and competent administration that the citizens of Lot 7 were offered by the Honourable
Director of Halifax, and indeed the same as I offer my own citizens.

The Honorable Reeve is a competent and capable adminstrator and does indeed show concern for his parish; please do not slander him so. His only fault is his disregard for direct involvement in extraprovincial affairs. The correct course of action here is not a crude disembowelment of Charlotte Parish! Hence my earlier proposal of a union between Charlotte Town and Charlotte Parish, in which Reeve Lance continues his administration of his current territory, but interprovincially his land shall be represented by a unified Greater Charlotte Parish. I believe this option is best for the people of the Reeve's parish. However, I understand the hesitance to alter the status quo, and suggest as a compromise that the honorable Reeve be allowed to select another Senator as his proxy in the Senate.

My city and it's rural counterpart are more closely linked than any other two parishes on the island, and I suggest that my representation would be best for the people of Charlotte Parish. I believe that Reeve Lance's deputy and his entire assembly delegation would agree on this.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 30, 2010, 07:11:04 PM
The Deputy Senator, who is currently relaxing in a pool of warm water while smoking a pope, wishes to point out that Charlotte Parish, under it's oldest definition, includes Queens Royalty http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlotte_Parish,_Prince_Edward_Island and that he is more than happy to discuss affairs including the internal operation of the parish with the mayor.

He also requests more beer, and wonders where his masseur is.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 30, 2010, 07:15:11 PM
A member of your church approaches and asks you to build a large cathedral in Kensington.

How much would such a construction cost the church approxemetly?

You could build a massive, awe-inspiring towering cathedral for 3€


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Bacon King on October 30, 2010, 07:17:48 PM
I propose to him the reunification of Charlotte Town and Parish- with the Deputy Senator to be my own Deputy, of course with an increased salary. The Reeve can maintain his title, if he desires, and serve as the administrator of the non-urban sections of the combined parish.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Bacon King on October 30, 2010, 07:18:39 PM
The Deputy Senator, who is currently relaxing in a pool of warm water while smoking a pope, wishes to point out that Charlotte Parish, under it's oldest definition, includes Queens Royalty http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlotte_Parish,_Prince_Edward_Island and that he is more than happy to discuss affairs including the internal operation of the parish with the mayor.

He also requests more beer, and wonders where his masseur is.

I propose to him the reunification of Charlotte Town and Parish- with the Deputy Senator to be my own Deputy, of course with an increased salary. The Reeve can maintain his title, if he desires, and serve as the administrator of the non-urban sections of the combined parish.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 30, 2010, 07:21:43 PM
Despite my previous attempt to make the Assembly more equitable for each Parish being met with ridicule, I have not given up on this endeavour. It is imperative that each Parish and City have a equitable distribution of Assemblymen with regard to its population. To that end, I propose the following legislation:

Quote
An increase in the membership of the Assembly to 127 members, to be apportioned among the various Parishes and Cities according to their population, as indicated by the latest censes figures. The apportionment is as follows:

Bedford Parish: 9 members
Charlotte Parish: 11 members
City of Charlottetown: 7 members
East Parish: 7 members
Edgmont Parish: 6 members
City of Georgetown: 2 members
Grenville Parish: 9 members
Halifax Parish: 7 members
Hillsborough Parish: 8 members
North Parish: 7 members
City of Princeton: 1 member
Richmond Parish: 13 members
St. Andrew Parish: 7 members
St. David Parish: 10 members
St. George Parish: 9 members
St. John Parish: 7 members
St. Patrick Parish: 7 members

The apportionment is based upon the sum totals of all Lots within a Parish. Lot 7 was counted as part of Halifax Parish. This legislation would leave the apportionment of each Parish's members among the lots the responsiblity of the Parish.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: homelycooking on October 30, 2010, 07:27:28 PM
I propose to him the reunification of Charlotte Town and Parish- with the Deputy Senator to be my own Deputy, of course with an increased salary. The Reeve can maintain his title, if he desires, and serve as the administrator of the non-urban sections of the combined parish.

Nonetheless, the Provost's assertion that Lot 24 is more easily incorporated within Grenville than a combined Charlotte parish (which the Provost does not object to, owing to the Mayor of Charlottetown's reknown for fair governance) remains lucid and relevant. A look at a map of the island shows clearly the geographic disconnect between Lot 24 and the other lots of Charlotte Parish and that Rustico is closer to any town in Grenville than Charlottetown. However, the Provost does not desire conflict and would not dare infringe upon the sovereignty of another parish. He only wishes to make the facts universally apparent so that the people of Charlotte may seek an enlightened self-determination.

The Provost is eager to acquire a map of roads, tracks and cartpaths on the island so that his decisions regarding transportation may become even more informed.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 30, 2010, 07:28:51 PM
I don't think the Bishop would approve of what the deputy senator from Charlotte is smoking... :P

I warn that it would be a grave mistake for Charlotte Parish to surrender its status to the Mayor of Charlottetown. The conflict between urban and rural interests makes it much more prudent that rural areas be represented in the Senate by a rural Parish. I will wholeheartedly oppose any attempt by Charlottetown to annex Charlotte Parish.

The best way to resolve this issue would be to either split Charlotte Parish amongst its rural neighbours, or to strip Reeve Lance of his title and appoint a new Reeve, who will actually take the trouble to represent his people in the Senate.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: homelycooking on October 30, 2010, 07:37:38 PM
In light of the honorable Chancellor's concerns regarding the Charlotte Parish/Charlottetown, the Provost would like to reassert that any dissolution of the Charlotte Parish government must result in the power most fit to govern having dominion over particular lots and towns. The Provost asserts that Grenville would indubitably be most able to govern Lot 24 and Rustico, while the Chancellor is most able to govern Lot 34 and York. If the Duke of Hillsborough so desires, he would be also be entitled to annex Lot 32 and Cornwall upon the dissolution of the government. In the Provost's eyes, any attempt to seize these towns by the Charlottetown government will be viewed as imperialist and bellicose.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 30, 2010, 07:45:42 PM
Bedford Bay

After an exhaustive search of the north shore, reports are the the only location within the Parish that is suitable for a wharf on the north shore is in Lot 37, east of the Sand Bars.

Bugger. I suppose that means that ships would be unable to enter the northern seas?

I will be visiting the "rural" areas of Lots 35 and 36, specifically the southern part of Lot 35 and the northern part of Lot 36, with the intent to address the specific concerns of citizens of these Lots. I suggest to these citizens a possible adjustment of the boundaries of these Lots, with Lot 35 consisting of the area north of the Hillsborough River and Lot 36 consisting of the area south of the river. If I am met with a positive response, I propose these adjustments to the Senate.

You can build a wharf on the northern seas, but only at the point noted.

Members of both lots think a re-adjustment would be a good idea, and wish for you to give the "go ahead"


My biggest concern is that the sandbars would impede the flow of naval traffic, making (for instance) a ferry service impractical or even impossible.



I propose the following legislation in the Senate:

Quote
A readjustment of the boundaries of Lots 35 and 36.

The boundaries of Lot 35 shall be readjusted as follows: Bedford Bay and the northern seas on the north, the Lot 34 border on the west, the Hillsborough River on the South, and the Lot 37 border on the east.

The boundaries of Lot 36 shall be readjusted as follows: The Hillsborough River on the north, the Lot 48 border on the west and south, and the Lot 37 border on the east.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Bacon King on October 30, 2010, 07:54:34 PM
(NOTE: Condensed multiple posts into one for simplicity.)

To the Honorable Chancellor of Bedford:

I have no desire to "seize" any territory, sir, and only seek the best interests of the Charlotte's citizens. Why not let the elected leaders of Charlotte decide what is right for their parish, rather than making grandiose self-interested assumptions while planning to chop the land into bits? If there was still somehow any doubt which of us Senators keeps the welfare of the people of Charlotte Parish at heart, it is now gone. I stand firmly beside the people of Charlotte, both town and parish, against your would-be imperialism.



The boundaries of Lot 36 shall be readjusted as follows: The Hillsborough River on the north, the Lot 48 border on the west and south, and the Lot 37 border on the east.

While I do agree with this proposal, I believe you are free to handle the issue internally. In fact, I am sure we would all agree that allowing Senators authority to redraw the lines in other's parishes to be a potentially dangerous precedent.



Despite my previous attempt to make the Assembly more equitable for each Parish being met with ridicule, I have not given up on this endeavour. It is imperative that each Parish and City have a equitable distribution of Assemblymen with regard to its population. To that end, I propose the following legislation:

Quote
An increase in the membership of the Assembly to 127 members, to be apportioned among the various Parishes and Cities according to their population, as indicated by the latest censes figures. The apportionment is as follows:

Bedford Parish: 9 members
Charlotte Parish: 11 members
City of Charlottetown: 7 members
East Parish: 7 members
Edgmont Parish: 6 members
City of Georgetown: 2 members
Grenville Parish: 9 members
Halifax Parish: 7 members
Hillsborough Parish: 8 members
North Parish: 7 members
City of Princeton: 1 member
Richmond Parish: 13 members
St. Andrew Parish: 7 members
St. David Parish: 10 members
St. George Parish: 9 members
St. John Parish: 7 members
St. Patrick Parish: 7 members

The apportionment is based upon the sum totals of all Lots within a Parish. Lot 7 was counted as part of Halifax Parish. This legislation would leave the apportionment of each Parish's members among the lots the responsiblity of the Parish.

I support, and would vote for, this distribution.

Also, note that the assembly recently suggested this to our esteemed body:

2 - The assembly proposes to fund 50% of all wharfs, rail lines, and such improvements, and wishes to seek senate approval.

With a lack of specific Senate guidelines, I hereby suggest we vote on these two proposals. For simplicity's sake I shall manage this vote. One may assume that a majority vote is sufficient to pass any proposals that do not deprive a parish of money or property (I believe some form of supermajority would be necessary in such a case to prevent abuse of specific regions through the Senate. I do believe a written set of guidelines will be required, however).

Therefore, let us vote!



Apportionment Proposal: Aye
Commerce and Transport Proposal: Aye


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: homelycooking on October 30, 2010, 07:58:24 PM
The Provost rejoins that unless the honorable Mayor of Charlottetown is prepared to extend a long rail or highway link to the town of Rustico, it cannot reasonably claim to be interested in its welfare, though the Provost believes that the highest judge in the Charlotte Parish case should be the parishoners themselves. Therefore, the Provost proposes that a referendum be held within the parish of Charlotte in which all able-minded and property-holding men will be given the opportunity to express their opinions as to whether they would wish to join the Parishes of Grenville, Bedford, Charlottetown or Hillsborough should the government of Charlotte dissolve. The Provost believes this to be a reasonable proposal and pledges to abide by the parishioners' decisions, as he hopes other governments will.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: homelycooking on October 30, 2010, 08:00:17 PM
The boundaries of Lot 36 shall be readjusted as follows: The Hillsborough River on the north, the Lot 48 border on the west and south, and the Lot 37 border on the east.

While I do agree with this proposal, I believe you are free to handle the issue internally. In fact, I am sure we would all agree that allowing Senators authority to redraw the lines in other's parishes to be a potentially dangerous precedent.

The Provost is fully in agreement with the Mayor of Charlottetown, and while he does not object to the Chancellor's reorganization scheme, he would be tempted to abstain from any vote on it in the Senate.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 30, 2010, 08:07:53 PM
I have no desire to "seize" any territory, sir, and only seek the best interests of the Charlotte's citizens. Why not let them decide what they want, rather than making grandiose self-interested assumptions while planning to chop their parish into bits? If there was still somehow any doubt which of us Senators keeps the welfare of the people of Charlotte Parish at heart, it is now gone. I stand firmly beside the people of Charlotte, both town and parish, against your would-be imperialism.

This hypocrisy is coming from the same man who has already attempted to gain for himself a second vote in the Senate by usurping the authority delegated to the Reeve of Charlotte Parish! The city of Charlottetown and the Parish of Charlotte are very different places with very different interests. I reassert my opinion that the administrator of an urban area cannot adequately represent the interests of a rural area- to do so would be a disservice to the people of both Charlotte Parish and Charlottetown.

I move that Reeve Lance be expelled from the Senate on the grounds of negligence, and that a replacement be appointed as soon as practicable. I further move that the administrator of a City or Parish be required to reside in that City or Parish, and that a person cannot be an administrator of more than one City and/or Parish simultaneously.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Bacon King on October 30, 2010, 08:09:13 PM
The Provost rejoins that unless the honorable Mayor of Charlottetown is prepared to extend a long rail or highway link to the town of Rustico, it cannot reasonably claim to be interested in its welfare, though the Provost believes that the highest judge in the Charlotte Parish case should be the parishoners themselves. Therefore, the Provost proposes that a referendum be held within the parish of Charlotte in which all able-minded and property-holding men will be given the opportunity to express their opinions as to whether they would wish to join the Parishes of Grenville, Bedford, Charlottetown or Hillsborough should the government of Charlotte dissolve. The Provost believes this to be a reasonable proposal and pledges to abide by the parishioners' decisions, as he hopes other governments will.

While their elected leaders already hold the power to represent them, I do agree to the formality of a vote, albeit with one caveat: there would be no "dissolution" of Charlotte should its former borders be restored, it would simply be a merger and union between its existing government and my city government.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 30, 2010, 08:09:35 PM
I withdraw my motion in the Senate to readjust the boundaries of Lots 35 and 36, and decree that the same be done in my official capacity as Chancellor.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: homelycooking on October 30, 2010, 08:16:56 PM
The Provost rejoins that unless the honorable Mayor of Charlottetown is prepared to extend a long rail or highway link to the town of Rustico, it cannot reasonably claim to be interested in its welfare, though the Provost believes that the highest judge in the Charlotte Parish case should be the parishoners themselves. Therefore, the Provost proposes that a referendum be held within the parish of Charlotte in which all able-minded and property-holding men will be given the opportunity to express their opinions as to whether they would wish to join the Parishes of Grenville, Bedford, Charlottetown or Hillsborough should the government of Charlotte dissolve. The Provost believes this to be a reasonable proposal and pledges to abide by the parishioners' decisions, as he hopes other governments will.

While their elected leaders already hold the power to represent them, I do agree to the formality of a vote, albeit with one caveat: there would be no "dissolution" of Charlotte should its former borders be restored, it would simply be a merger and union between its existing government and my city government.

The Provost, accounting for the Chancellor of Bedford's recent proposal, would prefer that no change be made to the current government of Charlotte Parish or its borders should a more competent replacement for Reeve Lance be installed. He wishes to clarify further that the aforementioned referendum would not be binding and serve only as a check on any of our imperial tendencies, and would take place only if the Reeve is stripped of his title and any change in government structure for Charlotte Parish is proposed.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Bacon King on October 30, 2010, 08:23:30 PM
edit: combined posts again to limit clutter.


I have no desire to "seize" any territory, sir, and only seek the best interests of the Charlotte's citizens. Why not let them decide what they want, rather than making grandiose self-interested assumptions while planning to chop their parish into bits? If there was still somehow any doubt which of us Senators keeps the welfare of the people of Charlotte Parish at heart, it is now gone. I stand firmly beside the people of Charlotte, both town and parish, against your would-be imperialism.

This hypocrisy is coming from the same man who has already attempted to gain for himself a second vote in the Senate by usurping the authority delegated to the Reeve of Charlotte Parish! The city of Charlottetown and the Parish of Charlotte are very different places with very different interests. I reassert my opinion that the administrator of an urban area cannot adequately represent the interests of a rural area- to do so would be a disservice to the people of both Charlotte Parish and Charlottetown.

You dare accuse me of hypocrisy? I simply seek the best for Charlotte Parish. My plan was suggested to allow the people of Charlotte proper representation in the Senate. I noted my availability for the position simply because I only trust myself among us to share their concerns; distant parishes are presumably apathetic, the Senator from Hillsborough has been acting as a madman, and Charlotte's other two neighbors have already made explicit imperialistic claims.

I can indeed properly manage a rural area. In fact, even if you don't trust my own judgement, note my proposal for the honorable Reeve to retain his administrative powers. There are thus only four differences that a union would mean for the people of Charlotte: more development thanks to an increased governmental budget, a stronger economy due to closer ties with my city, a strong voice in the Senate from my advocacy, and the increased prestige that comes from being politically joined to the national capital. While I mean no offense to you and believe you are an honorable gentleman sir, your argument here is wholly spurious.



Also, why must my fellow Senators bring disrepute upon the honorable Reeve? How is he negligent? Why should he be deposed at your whim? Are not the people of Charlotte Parish happy with the intraparish aspect of his rule?



The Provost rejoins that unless the honorable Mayor of Charlottetown is prepared to extend a long rail or highway link to the town of Rustico, it cannot reasonably claim to be interested in its welfare, though the Provost believes that the highest judge in the Charlotte Parish case should be the parishoners themselves. Therefore, the Provost proposes that a referendum be held within the parish of Charlotte in which all able-minded and property-holding men will be given the opportunity to express their opinions as to whether they would wish to join the Parishes of Grenville, Bedford, Charlottetown or Hillsborough should the government of Charlotte dissolve. The Provost believes this to be a reasonable proposal and pledges to abide by the parishioners' decisions, as he hopes other governments will.

While their elected leaders already hold the power to represent them, I do agree to the formality of a vote, albeit with one caveat: there would be no "dissolution" of Charlotte should its former borders be restored, it would simply be a merger and union between its existing government and my city government.

I conditionally withdraw this acceptance. It has become clear to me that any such referendum would only serve to legitimize the ludicrous idea that Charlotte Parish should be dismembered. You argue that some residents of Charlotte would rather live under your rule. Yet why has no resident or official within the parish made any comment regarding these issues you repeatedly announce, except for when they speak in support of Charlottetown?

Any vote would be entirely at the discretion of the Reeve's government, of course, but if it were to occur any options offering secession to another parish would, in my opinion, be nonsense. Why should they vote to be annexed by an imperialistic parish if not a single resident of Charlotte has expressed such an idea? If the people of Charlotte are to have a vote, it would be on whether to remain independent or gain the powerful benefits of a unity with Charlottetown. I'd like to know the Deputy Senator from Charlottetown's opinion on the matter, as I do believe he is authorized to make decisions about the parish in the honorable Reeve's absence.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 30, 2010, 08:45:44 PM
I withdraw my motion in the Senate to readjust the boundaries of Lots 35 and 36, and decree that the same be done in my official capacity as Chancellor.
This is done

(as for the rest of the discussion, I don't want to interrupt the debate!)


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: homelycooking on October 30, 2010, 08:52:31 PM
The Provost authorizes the dispatch of surveyors to the North Coast of Grenville Parish for the purpose of determining whether a wharf may be built on Grenville Bay and the cost and placement of a highway that would take the place of a North Coast link heretofore proposed.
The Provost is eager to acquire a map of roads, tracks and cartpaths on the island so that his decisions regarding transportation may become even more informed.

As intriguing as this debate is, the Provost must attend to the welfare of his people and seeks a report as to the progress of the survey.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 30, 2010, 08:53:51 PM
Charlotte's deputy senator says
Quote
The case for unity between the rural and urban parts of this parish is far stronger than it was only a short few weeks ago, however, we are not ready to commit to this just yet.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 30, 2010, 08:54:47 PM
My plan was suggested to allow the people of Charlotte proper representation in the Senate. I noted my availability for the position simply because I only trust myself among us to share their concerns; distant parishes are presumably apathetic, the Senator from Hillsborough has been acting as a madman, and Charlotte's other two neighbors have already made explicit imperialistic claims.

You are fooling no one. You claim to have Charlotte's best interests at heart, yet it never occurred to you to allow a native of Charlotte the Senate post, or its own Deputy Senator? Your actions were a blatant attempt to seize further power in the Senate!

I have made no imperialistic claims. I merely asserted my opinion that, should Charlotte Parish's government be dissolved, a division of its territory among its neighbours would be the best solution. This would allow the citizens of Charlotte Parish representation in the Senate without allowing any one Parish or City to become too large. I have since reversed that opinion, and I now feel that Charlotte Parish would be best served by one of its own.

I can indeed properly manage a rural area. In fact, even if you don't trust my own judgement, note my proposal for the honorable Reeve to retain his administrative powers. There are thus only four differences that a union would mean for the people of Charlotte: more development thanks to an increased governmental budget, a stronger economy due to closer ties with my city, a strong voice in the Senate from my advocacy, and the increased prestige that comes from being politically joined to the national capital. While I mean no offense to you and believe you are an honorable gentleman sir, your argument here is wholly spurious.

What exactly would be the Reeve's responsibilities under your plan? To act as a puppet? Who would hold the real power in Charlotte Parish?

Who would receive these alleged benefits, the people of Charlotte, or the people of Charlottetown? I can think of two valid reasons why you may not be up to the task of managing a union of Charlottetown and Charlotte Parish.

1. The conflict between urban interests and rural interests. As you are a competent Mayor, you may be able to manage one or the other, but it would be a great deal more difficult to deal with both simultaneously. And as you are unaccustomed to rural governance, I have grave concerns that you would be able to handle the latter at all.

2. The size of the union.  A union between Charlottetown and Charlotte Parish would have the largest population of any Parish on the island, by a significant amount. Combined with point 1, that would make your job much more demanding. I rather think you would be biting off far more than you can chew, so to speak. I must state again that you have no experience governing rural areas, and over 60% of the population of the union would be rural.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 30, 2010, 08:58:33 PM
I withdraw my motion in the Senate to readjust the boundaries of Lots 35 and 36, and decree that the same be done in my official capacity as Chancellor.
This is done

Any chance of this being reflected on the map? :P

I also insist that Pownal Station be placed on the map, as a reminder that Pownal is connected to the rail system.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 30, 2010, 09:24:54 PM
I withdraw my motion in the Senate to readjust the boundaries of Lots 35 and 36, and decree that the same be done in my official capacity as Chancellor.
This is done

Any chance of this being reflected on the map? :P

I also insist that Pownal Station be placed on the map, as a reminder that Pownal is connected to the rail system.

Done. Also note that you can reorganize the lots in your parish how you wish, but this is discouraged as the public tend to like where they live. Also note that you can not magic up new lots or magic away old ones without either senate support of heavy public support from the area.

Note I've added highest quality roads (in purple)

http://www.ridingbyriding.ca/AMSTAR/pei_map.gif

Petition for Redress
A group of a dozen citizens from Egmont Parish has arrived at the Parliament buildings to beg the government to do something. They favour annexation by nearby parishes.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 30, 2010, 09:56:31 PM
Despite my previous attempt to make the Assembly more equitable for each Parish being met with ridicule, I have not given up on this endeavour. It is imperative that each Parish and City have a equitable distribution of Assemblymen with regard to its population. To that end, I propose the following legislation:

Quote
An increase in the membership of the Assembly to 127 members, to be apportioned among the various Parishes and Cities according to their population, as indicated by the latest censes figures. The apportionment is as follows:

Bedford Parish: 9 members
Charlotte Parish: 11 members
City of Charlottetown: 7 members
East Parish: 7 members
Edgmont Parish: 6 members
City of Georgetown: 2 members
Grenville Parish: 9 members
Halifax Parish: 7 members
Hillsborough Parish: 8 members
North Parish: 7 members
City of Princeton: 1 member
Richmond Parish: 13 members
St. Andrew Parish: 7 members
St. David Parish: 10 members
St. George Parish: 9 members
St. John Parish: 7 members
St. Patrick Parish: 7 members

The apportionment is based upon the sum totals of all Lots within a Parish. Lot 7 was counted as part of Halifax Parish. This legislation would leave the apportionment of each Parish's members among the lots the responsiblity of the Parish.

I support, and would vote for, this distribution.

Also, note that the assembly recently suggested this to our esteemed body:

2 - The assembly proposes to fund 50% of all wharfs, rail lines, and such improvements, and wishes to seek senate approval.

With a lack of specific Senate guidelines, I hereby suggest we vote on these two proposals. For simplicity's sake I shall manage this vote. One may assume that a majority vote is sufficient to pass any proposals that do not deprive a parish of money or property (I believe some form of supermajority would be necessary in such a case to prevent abuse of specific regions through the Senate. I do believe a written set of guidelines will be required, however).

Therefore, let us vote!



Apportionment Proposal: Aye
Commerce and Transport Proposal: Aye

During our heated debate, I missed this post.

Apportionment Proposal: Aye

Commerce and Transport Proposal: I propose an amendment clause preventing the National Government from staking any claim to tolls or levies imposed by the Parishes beyond their existing right to 1/3 of Parish income.

I also suggest a vote on the Mayor of Charlottetown's proposal for a fixed exchange rate.

1. To prevent ambiguity in our economy, that the currency exchange be specifically defined by the national government, at a rate of $100 to £1, £33 to €1, and $3300 to €1.

Fixed Exchange Rate Proposal: Aye

(This edit corrects that the national government is entitled to 1/3 of Parish income, not 10%)


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Bacon King on October 30, 2010, 10:22:46 PM
I vote aye on your amendment to my proposal as well as the fixed exchange rates.

(OOC: posting on phone currently, will continue the heated debate when back at my computer! :) )


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: homelycooking on October 30, 2010, 10:54:30 PM
The Provost votes, on behalf of Grenville Parish:

Aye to Reapportionment
Aye to Currency Exchange Rate Proposal

Judgment on the Chancellor's amendment to the Commerce and Transport proposal will be withheld until tomorrow, as the Provost is greatly fatigued from his demanding daily schedule of debates and personal coercions. :)


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on October 30, 2010, 11:37:47 PM
I'd also like to send my congratulations to the hounarble Director of Halifax, and congratulate him on the fact that his annexation was calm, peacful, and ended in bloodshed. God bless your heart dear director.  

Ended in bloodshed?  I don't know what you're smoking.;)

By the order of the Right Honourable Director of Halifax, this State of Emergency is hereby ended.

I wish to make a formal declaration of open development of a "main street highway" so to say within Halifax Parish, beginning in Cape Wolfe in Lot 7, connecting Dublane, Hebron, Coleman, and ending in Foxley River.

I would like to create an exploratory committee as to the idea of the wharf.  This committee will determine it's feasibility, impact on the Halifax economy, and the surrounding enviornment, both short term and long term.

I would also like to announce the creation of a Habour in Egmont Bay, at the mouth of the Percival River.  Construction is to begin immediately on Harbour facilities and components for one patrol boat and two cargo ships are currently being produced in Ellersie and Dublane.

x The Director

I will get back to you shortly on all of these

A "highway" could be created, but there is nothing to run on it. Increasing the road to the highest possibly qualify over that distance would cost about 5,000$

A wharf could be constructed at Cape Wolfe for the cost of 7£

There is no suitable location for a wharf in that area of egmont bay.

Well i would at the very least like to build upon the road.  Would I be able to get away with $3000 by flattening it out and then paving it using stones?

This wharf will then be put under construction.

Are there any suitable locations for one in the area that won't conflict with my good friend from Richmond?


The cost is for a gravel road, 3,000$ may not provide for full year-round cover.

As for a wharf you will need to be more specific.

What would the costs of a wharf at Foxley River be?

And if $5000 is how much it costs then so be it.  I will alleviate funds from the local militia to compensate.

Oh, and aye to both proposals.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 30, 2010, 11:44:40 PM
Your assemblymen are begging you to invade the remainder of Egmont.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on October 30, 2010, 11:47:17 PM
Your assemblymen are begging you to invade the remainder of Egmont.

And I will not do so unless the Countess doesn't do anything and if and only if the Lots in that area wish for it.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 31, 2010, 12:11:32 AM
The situation in Edgmont is much akin to the situation in Charlotte. I would be a hypocrite if I did not advocate a similar course of action in Edgmont to the one I advocate for Charlotte. To that end, I move that Captain Jane be stripped of her title and expelled from the Senate, and that a replacement be appointed as soon as is practicable.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on October 31, 2010, 12:16:41 AM
The situation in Edgmont is much akin to the situation in Charlotte. I would be a hypocrite if I did not advocate a similar course of action in Edgmont to the one I advocate for Charlotte. To that end, I move that Captain Jane be stripped of her title and expelled from the Senate, and that a replacement be appointed as soon as is practicable.

She practically resigned already.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 31, 2010, 12:32:09 AM
Your assemblymen are begging you to invade the remainder of Egmont.

And I will not do so unless the Countess doesn't do anything and if and only if the Lots in that area wish for it.

They feel the Countess has abdicated her duty.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on October 31, 2010, 12:35:04 AM
Your assemblymen are begging you to invade the remainder of Egmont.

And I will not do so unless the Countess doesn't do anything and if and only if the Lots in that area wish for it.

They feel the Countess has abdicated her duty.

Once again, unless the people of Egmont wish for me to annex them, I will not do so;  It only results in unnecessary usage of resources, and I only annexed Lot 7 due to their dire need.

So, is there definite word by the various Lots about annexation?  If there is, then I will send for the militia.  If not, then I will leave the matter until it becomes a priority.

UPDATE:  Alright, I have reached the conclusion that this is a no win situation.  By the order of the Director of Halifax, 25 troops of the Militia are to annex all remaining areas of Egmont.  If I get word of any bloodshed or violence, I will immediately discharge and exile the soldier responsible.

x The Director


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 31, 2010, 12:37:00 AM
The situation in Edgmont is much akin to the situation in Charlotte. I would be a hypocrite if I did not advocate a similar course of action in Edgmont to the one I advocate for Charlotte. To that end, I move that Captain Jane be stripped of her title and expelled from the Senate, and that a replacement be appointed as soon as is practicable.

She practically resigned already.

That is true, but she technically must still be expelled before her replacement can be appointed.

(Incidentally, how are the adminstrators of the Parishes chosen? Are they elected? Appointed? By whom? And for how long?)


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 31, 2010, 01:59:40 AM

(Incidentally, how are the adminstrators of the Parishes chosen? Are they elected? Appointed? By whom? And for how long?)
Statement from the King
Hell if I know. People just show up and tell me who they are... so far there have been no disputes.

Your assemblymen are begging you to invade the remainder of Egmont.

And I will not do so unless the Countess doesn't do anything and if and only if the Lots in that area wish for it.

They feel the Countess has abdicated her duty.

Once again, unless the people of Egmont wish for me to annex them, I will not do so;  It only results in unnecessary usage of resources, and I only annexed Lot 7 due to their dire need.

So, is there definite word by the various Lots about annexation?  If there is, then I will send for the militia.  If not, then I will leave the matter until it becomes a priority.

UPDATE:  Alright, I have reached the conclusion that this is a no win situation.  By the order of the Director of Halifax, 25 troops of the Militia are to annex all remaining areas of Egmont.  If I get word of any bloodshed or violence, I will immediately discharge and exile the soldier responsible.

x The Director

ORDERS
These orders have been dispatched.


NEWS
A ferry carrying a dozen citizens has arrived from Ferry Point near Cornwall. Among them is the Reeve of Charlotte parish who quickly rushed a surprised Mayor of Charlottetown into a private meal where he informed him that he trusts his deputy, and has heard good things. He left on the next ferry out before having the chance to be questioned.

A ferry now operates every 45 minutes between these two points.

Also among the passengers was a fisherman from St. David who rushed here. He reports that he saw "no less than a dozen" humans across the water and wants the government to send vessels out to the area to investigate. Previously it had been presumed that these other areas were uninhabited.

The map has been updated. Rail lines are thicker now representing dual track. Purple roads are considered "all season" while brown roads may be impassible during very wet weather.

It should be noted that the remainder of the island is literally covered with dirt roads of poor quality that are quite often impassible in the spring, fall, winter, or after a summer downpour.



Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 31, 2010, 02:07:58 AM
NEWS

A popular opinion poll has been released, with over 25 people polled in each rural lot. The margin of error is +/- 20%, 19 times out of 20.

Leading the pack is the Chacellor who has the support of 100% of citizens polled in his parish.

The Mayor has the support of 96% while The Director, and The Bishop have the support of 92%.

Leaders of Grenville, Hillsborough, and St. George have the support of 88% of people polled.

Charlotte, North, East, St. Peters, St. Andrew, Richmond, and St. John each offer 84% support to their respective leaders.

In Georgetown, where only 5 people were polled, the local government has an 80% support ranking.

Egmont is the only parish with a negative ranking, with 24% approving, and 76% disapproving of local parish activities.

No one was able to enter Princeton due to guards at the border. It should be noted that other than the Commander of that city, no one from Princeton has been heard of, ever, as far as we know.

Island wide, a sample of 405 people (MoE 5% 19/20) gave an approval of 89% to the national government.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 31, 2010, 02:16:32 AM
Your assemblymen are begging you to invade the remainder of Egmont.

And I will not do so unless the Countess doesn't do anything and if and only if the Lots in that area wish for it.

They feel the Countess has abdicated her duty.

Once again, unless the people of Egmont wish for me to annex them, I will not do so;  It only results in unnecessary usage of resources, and I only annexed Lot 7 due to their dire need.

So, is there definite word by the various Lots about annexation?  If there is, then I will send for the militia.  If not, then I will leave the matter until it becomes a priority.

UPDATE:  Alright, I have reached the conclusion that this is a no win situation.  By the order of the Director of Halifax, 25 troops of the Militia are to annex all remaining areas of Egmont.  If I get word of any bloodshed or violence, I will immediately discharge and exile the soldier responsible.

x The Director


UPDATE - The northern portions of Lot 6 have been secured. Residents are reported to be very friendly towards the troops, and some have even joined the troops as they continue their march. Lot 5, in whole, has also been secured. Lot 4 is in the process of being secured, west to east.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 31, 2010, 02:21:29 AM
What day is it? I'd like to have some sense of how much time has elapsed.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 31, 2010, 02:23:30 AM
29 of Spring


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 31, 2010, 02:39:35 AM
Who conducted the opinion poll?


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 31, 2010, 02:53:31 AM
various local media outlets.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 31, 2010, 03:23:34 AM
I am deeply concerned about the situation in Princeton. The Commander has not appointed a Deputy Senator, nor an Assemblyman, and now guards have turned away newspaper reporters at the city gates. I propose that we appoint a representative of the national government to investigate the condition of the city.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: homelycooking on October 31, 2010, 09:22:00 AM
In light of the opinion polling conducted, the Provost feels that the Reeve of Charlotte, having clearly won over the vast majority of his citizens, ought to remain as his parish's leader. The Provost wishes to point out, however, that polling results may have varied among the lots and it is not clear whether the voters' disapproval is concentrated in one lot or spread evenly throughout the parish. The Provost inquires as to the existence of more in-depth polling results.

The Provost joins the Chancellor of Bedford in expressing his concern as to the state of governance in Princeton. Commander Rupert should be contacted forthwith and permitted to explain the peculiar state of his town.

The Provost believes that, in the interest of intra-island trade, the national and parish governments should endeavour to connect all towns on the island without reliable roads to their parish capitals. He therefore proposes the following:

Roads shall be constructed to connect all towns currently reliant upon poor-quality paths and tracks to the nearest town with a highway of sufficient quality for commerce and general transportation, at a cost shared equally by the Parishes in which the roads shall be constructed and the provincial government.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 31, 2010, 09:28:53 AM
WAR UPDATE:

http://www.ridingbyriding.ca/AMSTAR/pei_map.gif

Egmont Parish no longer exists.

Troops took Alberton, where they were greeted with some reservation but no opposition. They happened upon Jane who was on her way to market. When confronted that she had not been doing her duty she said
Quote
oh. OH. Yes. Right. Oh. Well, here.
and handed them her "seal of office" before saying she was busy and went about her way.

The only trouble spot was in O'Leary. Troops were denied access to this town by troops from within the town. They demanded one of two things. Either to speak, personally, with The Director, or, to have O'Leary become the capitol of the newly expanded Halifax Parish. They point out that O'Leary is much larger then Ellerslie, and that the latter is the smallest Parish Capitol on the entire island.

Citizens in Ellerslie are indifferent towards this, though, some 20-30 would need to be re-located (and are willing to do so if ordered)


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 31, 2010, 10:47:12 AM
In light of the opinion polling conducted, the Provost feels that the Reeve of Charlotte, having clearly won over the vast majority of his citizens, ought to remain as his parish's leader. The Provost wishes to point out, however, that polling results may have varied among the lots and it is not clear whether the voters' disapproval is concentrated in one lot or spread evenly throughout the parish. The Provost inquires as to the existence of more in-depth polling results.

The Provost joins the Chancellor of Bedford in expressing his concern as to the state of governance in Princeton. Commander Rupert should be contacted forthwith and permitted to explain the peculiar state of his town.

The Provost believes that, in the interest of intra-island trade, the national and parish governments should endeavour to connect all towns on the island without reliable roads to their parish capitals. He therefore proposes the following:

Roads shall be constructed to connect all towns currently reliant upon poor-quality paths and tracks to the nearest town with a highway of sufficient quality for commerce and general transportation, at a cost shared equally by the Parishes in which the roads shall be constructed and the provincial government.

If the citizens of Charlotte are content without an equal voice in the Senate, then I no longer call for Reeve Lance's removal. I share the Provost's concerns about whether dissatifaction is concentrated in one spot or spread evenly around the parish, and his call for more in-depth results. To that end, I propose to the Honourable Provost that his Parish and mine jointly fund an independent committee to conduct such polling in the individual Lots, particularly Lots 24 and 34. I stress that such a committee would be independent, and not acting on behalf of any government.

With regard to the Provost's road construction proposal, I propose that good roads be built to all towns, not only those with poor roads leading to them. It is ridiculous that towns the size of Cavendish and Rustico have no roads leading to them at all.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on October 31, 2010, 10:58:31 AM
The only trouble spot was in O'Leary. Troops were denied access to this town by troops from within the town. They demanded one of two things. Either to speak, personally, with The Director, or, to have O'Leary become the capitol of the newly expanded Halifax Parish. They point out that O'Leary is much larger then Ellerslie, and that the latter is the smallest Parish Capitol on the entire island.

Citizens in Ellerslie are indifferent towards this, though, some 20-30 would need to be re-located (and are willing to do so if ordered)

I wish to speak directly to the people of O'Leary in order to hear their concerns and demands.

Also, how is the construction of my road and the wharf at Foxley River?


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 31, 2010, 03:05:52 PM
As the tensions between Bedford and Hillsborough seem to have eased, the Chancellor rescinds the order regarding militia placement. Militiamen stationed in the cities of Rosebank, Tracadie, and Mount Stewart are free to return to their homes. However, 10 horses and 1 boat will continue to be reserved for militia use.

The decree regarding Bedford's fisherman and sailing vessels being prohibited from entering the territorial waters of Hillsborough Parish remains in effect.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: homelycooking on October 31, 2010, 03:47:10 PM

If the citizens of Charlotte are content without an equal voice in the Senate, then I no longer call for Reeve Lance's removal. I share the Provost's concerns about whether dissatifaction is concentrated in one spot or spread evenly around the parish, and his call for more in-depth results. To that end, I propose to the Honourable Provost that his Parish and mine jointly fund an independent committee to conduct such polling in the individual Lots, particularly Lots 24 and 34. I stress that such a committee would be independent, and not acting on behalf of any government.

The Provost would enthusiastically support a joint-funded independent poll for the purpose of determining lot by lot and town by town where the people's allegiances lie. He feels that no government can rationally oppose such a poll if it is conducted fairly, for more accurate information can only serve to smother ignorance and inform our deliberations.

With regard to the Provost's road construction proposal, I propose that good roads be built to all towns, not only those with poor roads leading to them. It is ridiculous that towns the size of Cavendish and Rustico have no roads leading to them at all.

In principle, the Provost whole-heartedly supports this amendment. However, he believes that an analysis of the cost of building high quality roads to all towns on the island would be necessary at first, as such an expense could be beyond the means of certain Parish governments.

The Provost authorizes a group of engineers to assess the risk posed by the steep grade on the rail line passing through Hunter River, and awaits a report as to their findings.

The Provost also awaits the report of his surveyors' journey to Grenville Bay and their proposal, if any, for wharf construction on said bay.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese on October 31, 2010, 04:10:01 PM
I'm shocked that the Duke of Hillsborough still continues to ignore me. As spiritual leader of the land I'm deeply insulted that he not only refuses my inventation to a peace and reconciliation mass, but also has also refused to explain or excuse his behaviour. This does him no credit, and cast a lot of doubt on both his faith in the church and his judgement as a leader. I'm afraid that if the Duke continus to fail at delivering his reply to me, I'll have to launch an inquisition to explore where his true faith lies.

Furthermore, as the situation in Princeton seems to be getting worse, I might have no other choice but to annex the city into God's graceful community and sieze it for the parish of St. David. I most humbly request the king to commision a poll in the city to find out if this course
of action would be favoured by the city's inhabitons.

Quote
You could build a massive, awe-inspiring towering cathedral for 3€
 

...


What could I get for 30$?

How about a smaller not so awe-inspiring, with one short tower and a leaking roof cathedral? Our lord teach us that less is more after all.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 31, 2010, 04:37:36 PM
Quote
You could build a massive, awe-inspiring towering cathedral for 3€
 

What could I get for 30$?

How about a smaller not so awe-inspiring, with one short tower and a leaking roof cathedral? Our lord teach us that less is more after all.


Considering that a house costs £10-15, I think $30 would get you something like this:

()

It is ill-fitting that our esteemed Bishop must conduct his services in an inadequate church. I propose that, as good Christians, we donate money to the church for the purposes of building a proper Cathedral in the city of Kensington. I propose that the national government contribute €1, one-third of the cost. By my calculations, if each Parish and City were willing to contribute £4, that would cover the entire cost of the Cathedral. On behalf of the good Christians of Bedford Parish, I will be the first to donate £4.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: homelycooking on October 31, 2010, 05:19:37 PM
The Provost is also eager to make a donation for the spiritual well-being of the parishoners of Saint David, but transportation deficiencies within his own parish necessitate a tightening of the purse-strings. The Provost means no ill will to his most honorable neighbors in Saint David, and would gladly contribute more in the future, but at this time he is prepared only to contribute £2 toward a cathedral.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese on October 31, 2010, 06:06:16 PM
Ah my dearest chancellor and provost. Your generosity and your faith are more than pleasing. God's blessing to both of you. I will say a special prayer for you and your parishes during this evening's cermon. You are both truly good Christian men. And if we can gather enough money to build this cathedral I promise that you'll be invited to a splendid mass in the new cathedral as well as a glouries banquet at my house.

And as Bishop I will of course set a good example and put aside 6 £ to the cause from my own parish.

   


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 31, 2010, 07:01:15 PM
The only trouble spot was in O'Leary. Troops were denied access to this town by troops from within the town. They demanded one of two things. Either to speak, personally, with The Director, or, to have O'Leary become the capitol of the newly expanded Halifax Parish. They point out that O'Leary is much larger then Ellerslie, and that the latter is the smallest Parish Capitol on the entire island.

Citizens in Ellerslie are indifferent towards this, though, some 20-30 would need to be re-located (and are willing to do so if ordered)

I wish to speak directly to the people of O'Leary in order to hear their concerns and demands.

Also, how is the construction of my road and the wharf at Foxley River?

You've met with them and they inform you directly of their demands, which are to in short relocate the capitol to O'Leary, though they'd also accept Alberton. Short of either of those they want a 10,000$ investment in the former Egmont Parish to be distributed as it's local citizens see fit.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 31, 2010, 07:27:24 PM
I am deeply concerned about the situation in Princeton. The Commander has not appointed a Deputy Senator, nor an Assemblyman, and now guards have turned away newspaper reporters at the city gates. I propose that we appoint a representative of the national government to investigate the condition of the city.

After some deliberation, I would like to nominate His Grace the Bishop of St. David for this task,
for the following reasons:

1. Of all Senators, he is the closest one to Princeton geographically, and thus would be the least inconvenienced.

2. If the city guards are indeed good Christians, they would not dare to turn away God's representative. This status may also gain him entry to places where others would be denied.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese on October 31, 2010, 07:40:30 PM
I would be honoured to take the assignment for the good of all Christians in Princeton. Unless the King objects I shall make the arrangements to make the journay to town as soon as the conditions allow it. I will be needing a personal guard of five to assist and protect me on my way to Princeton and if the king apporves this mission. 

   


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on October 31, 2010, 07:56:20 PM
The only trouble spot was in O'Leary. Troops were denied access to this town by troops from within the town. They demanded one of two things. Either to speak, personally, with The Director, or, to have O'Leary become the capitol of the newly expanded Halifax Parish. They point out that O'Leary is much larger then Ellerslie, and that the latter is the smallest Parish Capitol on the entire island.

Citizens in Ellerslie are indifferent towards this, though, some 20-30 would need to be re-located (and are willing to do so if ordered)

I wish to speak directly to the people of O'Leary in order to hear their concerns and demands.

Also, how is the construction of my road and the wharf at Foxley River?

You've met with them and they inform you directly of their demands, which are to in short relocate the capitol to O'Leary, though they'd also accept Alberton. Short of either of those they want a 10,000$ investment in the former Egmont Parish to be distributed as it's local citizens see fit.

$10,000 investment?  Can this be in the form of construction and infrastructure projects?


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: homelycooking on October 31, 2010, 07:58:07 PM
I would be honoured to take the assignment for the good of all Christians in Princeton. Unless the King objects I shall make the arrangements to make the journay to town as soon as the conditions allow it. I will be needing a personal guard of five to assist and protect me on my way to Princeton and if the king apporves this mission.  

If the Bishop so desires, the Provost would gladly provide three of his sturdiest, most capable militiamen to protect His Grace on his journey.



Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Bacon King on October 31, 2010, 08:10:57 PM

You are fooling no one. You claim to have Charlotte's best interests at heart, yet it never occurred to you to allow a native of Charlotte the Senate post, or its own Deputy Senator? Your actions were a blatant attempt to seize further power in the Senate!

The Senate, as an intentionally more prestigious body versus the Assembly, should only consist of the rightful leaders of the parishes. We have two interconnected tasks: to govern our own parish and represent it in the Senate. A Deputy's intended job is to take over the role of the Parish leader when he leaves office. Considering we do not have any legal provision for a leader doing one job but not the other, I suggested that the honorable Reeve select a proxy among other Senators as the simplest possible solution.

However, if it is indeed acceptable, I completely accept recognizing Charlotte's current deputy to be the parish's official Senator.

Quote
I have made no imperialistic claims. I merely asserted my opinion that, should Charlotte Parish's government be dissolved, a division of its territory among its neighbours would be the best solution. This would allow the citizens of Charlotte Parish representation in the Senate without allowing any one Parish or City to become too large. I have since reversed that opinion, and I now feel that Charlotte Parish would be best served by one of its own.

Making such plans when there was no hint of instability or disunity from Charlotte Parish? Can you not deny such an action, even with the best of intentions, reeks of suspicion? However, as you have recanted your earlier statements I shall speak on the subject no more. I do agree with you that Charlotte's deputy may officially represent his parish, rather than only doing so de facto. In celebration, I shall throw a lavish party in his honor. He shall also receive an increased stipend more fitting of his position.

Quote
What exactly would be the Reeve's responsibilities under your plan? To act as a puppet? Who would hold the real power in Charlotte Parish?

Who would receive these alleged benefits, the people of Charlotte, or the people of Charlottetown? I can think of two valid reasons why you may not be up to the task of managing a union of Charlottetown and Charlotte Parish.

1. The conflict between urban interests and rural interests. As you are a competent Mayor, you may be able to manage one or the other, but it would be a great deal more difficult to deal with both simultaneously. And as you are unaccustomed to rural governance, I have grave concerns that you would be able to handle the latter at all.

2. The size of the union.  A union between Charlottetown and Charlotte Parish would have the largest population of any Parish on the island, by a significant amount. Combined with point 1, that would make your job much more demanding. I rather think you would be biting off far more than you can chew, so to speak. I must state again that you have no experience governing rural areas, and over 60% of the population of the union would be rural.

Should a reunification of my city with Charlotte Parish commence, 90% of tithes raised in the rural areas will be under the sole jurisdiction of the Reeve. The other 10% would also be forbidden to be allocated towards local improvements within Charlottetown. Considering no such restrictions will exist on tithes from Charlottetown, I do believe the rural areas will benefit the most, indeed.

You raise the issue that I could not manage the size of the parish or understand the nature of the rural areas, hence my proposal for the honorable Reeve to manage exactly the land he does currently!

The truth of the matter is that Charlottetown and Charlotte Parish have much more similarities than differences, and share many similar virtues, beliefs, and opinions that transcend this superficial "urban-rural" divide of which you allege.



The situation in Edgmont is much akin to the situation in Charlotte. I would be a hypocrite if I did not advocate a similar course of action in Edgmont to the one I advocate for Charlotte. To that end, I move that Captain Jane be stripped of her title and expelled from the Senate, and that a replacement be appointed as soon as is practicable.

I beg your pardon? "Much akin to the situation in Charlotte?" How dare you insult the honorable Reeve in such a manner!


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on October 31, 2010, 08:27:13 PM
The situation in Edgmont is much akin to the situation in Charlotte. I would be a hypocrite if I did not advocate a similar course of action in Edgmont to the one I advocate for Charlotte. To that end, I move that Captain Jane be stripped of her title and expelled from the Senate, and that a replacement be appointed as soon as is practicable.

I beg your pardon? "Much akin to the situation in Charlotte?" How dare you insult the honorable Reeve in such a manner!

I'm pretty sure there's no love lost between Jane and the other Senators.:P

I'm saddened that I had to annex Egmont, because I believe I may have opened a can of worms that will lead to the downfall of this country.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 31, 2010, 08:53:07 PM
The only trouble spot was in O'Leary. Troops were denied access to this town by troops from within the town. They demanded one of two things. Either to speak, personally, with The Director, or, to have O'Leary become the capitol of the newly expanded Halifax Parish. They point out that O'Leary is much larger then Ellerslie, and that the latter is the smallest Parish Capitol on the entire island.

Citizens in Ellerslie are indifferent towards this, though, some 20-30 would need to be re-located (and are willing to do so if ordered)

I wish to speak directly to the people of O'Leary in order to hear their concerns and demands.

Also, how is the construction of my road and the wharf at Foxley River?

You've met with them and they inform you directly of their demands, which are to in short relocate the capitol to O'Leary, though they'd also accept Alberton. Short of either of those they want a 10,000$ investment in the former Egmont Parish to be distributed as it's local citizens see fit.

$10,000 investment?  Can this be in the form of construction and infrastructure projects?

It would be for whatever they demand. You can negotiate with them if you wish, you can do it here, or via PM with me.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 31, 2010, 08:53:59 PM
The Senate, as an intentionally more prestigious body versus the Assembly, should only consist of the rightful leaders of the parishes. We have two interconnected tasks: to govern our own parish and represent it in the Senate. A Deputy's intended job is to take over the role of the Parish leader when he leaves office.

And since the Reeve of Charlotte has vacated the office of Senator, then it stands to reason that the Deputy should assume that office, not any other person, and certainly not one who is not a resident of Charlotte Parish himself.

Quote
Making such plans when there was no hint of instability or disunity from Charlotte Parish? Can you not deny such an action, even with the best of intentions, reeks of suspicion?

I most certainly do deny any suspicious intent! My only concern was that the parishioners of Charlotte were represented by a competent government not only at the parish level, but at the national level as well. You cannot deny that Reeve Lance has abandoned the latter duty.

Quote
Should a reunification of my city with Charlotte Parish commence, 90% of tithes raised in the rural areas will be under the sole jurisdiction of the Reeve. The other 10% would also be forbidden to be allocated towards local improvements within Charlottetown. Considering no such restrictions will exist on tithes from Charlottetown, I do believe the rural areas will benefit the most, indeed.

This only stands to reinforce my point. As you would begin to focus more money and effort into maintance of the rural region, you would also begin to neglect the needs of Charlottetown residents.

Quote
I beg your pardon? "Much akin to the situation in Charlotte?" How dare you insult the honorable Reeve in such a manner!

While the situation in Charlotte is not as severe as the situation in Edgmont, there are definite similarities in that the Parish Administrator has neglected at least part of his or her duties.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 31, 2010, 09:04:04 PM
I would be honoured to take the assignment for the good of all Christians in Princeton. Unless the King objects I shall make the arrangements to make the journay to town as soon as the conditions allow it. I will be needing a personal guard of five to assist and protect me on my way to Princeton and if the king apporves this mission.  

  

As Chancellor of Bedford Parish, I offer to Your Grace the temporary services of two of my most competent militiamen- James Ruston of Rosebank, and Henry Jacobs of Mount Stewart. I know both of these men personally, and I can attest to their competence in discretion, valour, and combat ability.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 31, 2010, 09:23:11 PM
The O'Leary protesters have been dispersed due to agreement with the government.

The parish will pay 6,000$ and fresh elections will be held in the former egmont parish.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 31, 2010, 09:32:40 PM
UPDATE:

ASSETS / BUDGET
(Things owned by the various goverments)

NATIONAL GOVERNMENT
179 Horses
268 Cattle
111 Hogs
515 Sheep
21 Boats
41 €
1,209 £
172,114 $
3' 6" gauge track: Dual track; length of 460 miles.
3 lite locomotive (rail) boilers (wood burning) (attached to shells)
3 lite locomotive (rail) shells (One attached to each "train")
6 passenger rail cars (Two attached to each "train")
18 freight fail cars (Six attached to each "train")


NORTH
29 Horses
44 Cattle
14 Hogs
88 Sheep
3 Boats
4 €
140 £
19,994 $

EGMONT
0 Horses 3 Missing - 27 to Halifax
0 Cattle 4 Missing - 32 to Halifax
0 Hogs 2 Missing - 14 to Halifax
0 Sheep 10 Missing - 80 to Halifax
0 Boats 2 to Halifax
0 € 4 € Missing
0 £ 44£ Missing - 100£ to Halifax
0 $ 2$ Missing - 20,100$ to Halifax

HALIFAX
59 Horses 27
79 Cattle 32
33 Hogs 14
169 Sheep 80
5 Boats 2
4 €
243 £   93£
31,001 $  11,100$
1 Wharf under construction (north shore)
Highway Project

RICHMOND
46 Horses
62 Cattle
28 Hogs
122 Sheep
4 Boats
6 €
172 £
29,210 $

ST. DAVID
40 Horses
49 Cattle
21 Hogs
104 Sheep
3 Boats
5 €
160 £
23,333 $

PRINCETON
8 Horses
6 Cattle
2 Hogs
12 Sheep
2 Boats
2 €
50 £
12,406 $

GRENVILLE
34 Horses
53 Cattle
21 Hogs
107 Sheep
3 Boats
5 €
148 £
21,717 $

HILLSBORUGH
38 Horses
57 Cattle
18 Hogs
122 Sheep
3 Boats
6 €
147 £
22,525 $

CHARLOTTE
40 Horses
48 Cattle
20 Hogs
104 Sheep
4 Boats
4 €
164 £
22,012 $

CHARLOTTETOWN
12 Horses
8 Cattle
6 Hogs
8 Sheep
4 Boats
6 €
161 £ 50£
31,974 $
1 half-finished freight rail car (under construction)
2 Cargo Vessels (under construction)

BEDFORD
39 Horses
60 Cattle
26 Hogs
120 Sheep
3 Boats
4 €
129 £ 30£
22,009 $
1 Cargo Vessel (Under Construction)
1 Wharf under construction (north shore)

ST. JOHN
35 Horses
53 Cattle
19 Hogs
99 Sheep
2 Boats
5 €
141 £
20,154 $

ST. PATRICK
33 Horses
52 Cattle
24 Hogs
94 Sheep
3 Boats
6 €
139 £
21,077 $

EAST
31 Horses
48 Cattle
18 Hogs
89 Sheep
3 Boats
5 €
160 £
21,099 $

ST. GEORGE
36 Horses
56 Cattle
24 Hogs
112 Sheep
4 Boats
4 €
168 £
22,124 $

GEORGETOWN
15 Horses
12 Cattle
4 Hogs
18 Sheep
2 Boats
3 €
121 £
17,114 $



Note that Tithes come in once a season.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 31, 2010, 09:33:41 PM
I would be honoured to take the assignment for the good of all Christians in Princeton. Unless the King objects I shall make the arrangements to make the journay to town as soon as the conditions allow it. I will be needing a personal guard of five to assist and protect me on my way to Princeton and if the king apporves this mission. 

   

You go, and, are met with the same roadblock.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on October 31, 2010, 09:36:27 PM
Missing?  What do you mean missing? >:(


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 31, 2010, 09:41:14 PM

Stolen likely.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on October 31, 2010, 09:51:20 PM

*sigh*  You know what, I'm so happy I'm finished with this annexing BS, I'll let that slide.

I'll just wait for the Highway pricing update.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: homelycooking on October 31, 2010, 10:27:14 PM

If the citizens of Charlotte are content without an equal voice in the Senate, then I no longer call for Reeve Lance's removal. I share the Provost's concerns about whether dissatifaction is concentrated in one spot or spread evenly around the parish, and his call for more in-depth results. To that end, I propose to the Honourable Provost that his Parish and mine jointly fund an independent committee to conduct such polling in the individual Lots, particularly Lots 24 and 34. I stress that such a committee would be independent, and not acting on behalf of any government.

The Provost would enthusiastically support a joint-funded independent poll for the purpose of determining lot by lot and town by town where the people's allegiances lie. He feels that no government can rationally oppose such a poll if it is conducted fairly, for more accurate information can only serve to smother ignorance and inform our deliberations.

With regard to the Provost's road construction proposal, I propose that good roads be built to all towns, not only those with poor roads leading to them. It is ridiculous that towns the size of Cavendish and Rustico have no roads leading to them at all.

In principle, the Provost whole-heartedly supports this amendment. However, he believes that an analysis of the cost of building high quality roads to all towns on the island would be necessary at first, as such an expense could be beyond the means of certain Parish governments.

The Provost authorizes a group of engineers to assess the risk posed by the steep grade on the rail line passing through Hunter River, and awaits a report as to their findings.

The Provost also awaits the report of his surveyors' journey to Grenville Bay and their proposal, if any, for wharf construction on said bay.

The Provost grows impatient at the inaction on his decrees, and fears that his loyal engineers and surveyors may have been devoured by the local fauna.

I would be honoured to take the assignment for the good of all Christians in Princeton. Unless the King objects I shall make the arrangements to make the journay to town as soon as the conditions allow it. I will be needing a personal guard of five to assist and protect me on my way to Princeton and if the king apporves this mission.  

  

You go, and, are met with the same roadblock.

The Provost has not heard from his three crack militiamen, Angus MacLeary, John Carlyle, and Matthew Tucker in some days. Honorable Bishop, are they with you?

The Provost also wishes to make known that his government, in hopes of exploiting the resources of his parish to the greatest extent possible, does offer a subsidy to any enterprising lad who wishes to till the most fertile soils of the parish. The Provost's government will share the cost of purchasing any unimproved parcel of land equally with the buyer for the remaining days of spring. However, the Provost reserves the right to deny this subsidy to speculators and non-resident landlords.


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 31, 2010, 10:46:49 PM
All attempts to move into princeton are met with a roadblock (if you want more, you'll have to tell the troops to do when they reach said roadblock)

The prospectors are still searching the bay


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 31, 2010, 10:57:51 PM
IMPORTANT NOTICE

I'm going to fast forward the game by a few weeks.

Why?
I need to try to organize this hodge-podge of stuff. I am also going to open a new thread for the game to help keep it better organized.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 31, 2010, 11:14:22 PM
I've decided to keep this as the "main thread" where assembly/senate discussions/decisions are, and, where news will be posted by me.

Note however the results of your actions will be posted in the actions thread.

When the game resumes in 15 minutes it will be week 7 of Spring.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 31, 2010, 11:31:40 PM
GAME UNPAUSED.
Business Before the Senate

There is still some wonder about the people sighted across the straight.

There is still the concern about Princeton.

The island has been undertaken in rapid inflation due to the fact that currency is running out. There are no sources for any of the metals in existence on the island and barter is beginning to replace currencies. There are reports of Gold ( € ) being traded for 50 silver ( £ ) and silver for 200 Copper ( $ )


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on October 31, 2010, 11:37:30 PM
Should we raise prices of commodities then?

I thought I paid for all-season roads?


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 31, 2010, 11:46:20 PM
I propose that representatives of the national government be sent across the southern strait to explore the lands to the south, and make contact with residents there.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 31, 2010, 11:46:53 PM
That would cost more :P

You can upgrade if you wish

also
Militiamen in Bedford wonder if they are going to get paid? The militia is a volunteer service but the Chancellor has been using them as a standing army. They uurge the chancellor to create a standing army so that they can be paid.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on October 31, 2010, 11:49:51 PM
That would cost more :P

You can upgrade if you wish

How much more would it cost?


Title: Re: Prince Edward Island (election/political/war game)
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on October 31, 2010, 11:50:43 PM
also
Militiamen in Bedford wonder if they are going to get paid? The militia is a volunteer service but the Chancellor has been using them as a standing army. They uurge the chancellor to create a standing army so that they can be paid.

As the tensions between Bedford and Hillsborough seem to have eased, the Chancellor rescinds the order regarding militia placement. Militiamen stationed in the cities of Rosebank, Tracadie, and Mount Stewart are free to return to their homes. However, 10 horses and 1 boat will continue to be reserved for militia use.

The decree regarding Bedford's fisherman and sailing vessels being prohibited from entering the territorial waters of Hillsborough Parish remains in effect.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 31, 2010, 11:55:04 PM
In particular this is in response to your requests for a naval expedition.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on October 31, 2010, 11:59:46 PM

1€ to upgrade every road in your expanded parish to all-season


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on November 01, 2010, 12:01:26 AM

Nevermind then.  That price is way too high.  How many times that it rain too much anyways?:P

Besides, I need to pay for my Infrastructure Acts (they're in the Actions thread if you wanna see)


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on November 01, 2010, 12:07:05 AM
In particular this is in response to your requests for a naval expedition.

The Chancellor is willing to pay those who take part in active duty for an extended period, but wishes to refrain from creating a standing army, as he does not wish to appear belligerent. The Bedford Parish Militia remains primarily a volunteer service.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 01, 2010, 12:12:57 AM
Note - A government may convert between currencies at any time they wish, they just need to contact a merchant who will give them his prices.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on November 01, 2010, 12:16:56 AM
Note - A government may convert between currencies at any time they wish, they just need to contact a merchant who will give them his prices.

I take it that the fixed currency legislation failed in the Senate?


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl on November 01, 2010, 12:17:52 AM
As Ἄρχων Ἅγιου Ιωάννου, I would like to voice support for a free market in currency.

 But if there is a shortage of currency currently, shouldn't we be seeing some price deflation?


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on November 01, 2010, 12:22:34 AM
As Ἄρχων Ἅγιου Ιωάννου, I would like to voice support for a free market in currency.

 But if there is a shortage of currency currently, shouldn't we be seeing some price deflation?

Says the guy who hasn't governed in weeks.:P ;)


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 01, 2010, 12:22:41 AM
Note - A government may convert between currencies at any time they wish, they just need to contact a merchant who will give them his prices.

I take it that the fixed currency legislation failed in the Senate?

When inflation took hold, many senators lost interest.

As Ἄρχων Ἅγιου Ιωάννου, I would like to voice support for a free market in currency.

 But if there is a shortage of currency currently, shouldn't we be seeing some price deflation?

People are hoarding larger currencies hoping that the values will rise. € are becoming especially scarce as people do not want to pay with them.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Psychic Octopus on November 01, 2010, 12:29:01 AM
I, the Magistrate of the land called St. Andrew, have awoken from my long slumber. I concur that an expedition should be sent into the Southern lands, and offer my harbors as refuge for adventurers.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on November 01, 2010, 12:30:55 AM
Note - A government may convert between currencies at any time they wish, they just need to contact a merchant who will give them his prices.

I take it that the fixed currency legislation failed in the Senate?

When inflation took hold, many senators lost interest.

And what of the other proposals (Reapportionment of the Assembly, and Omnibus Transportation Act)?


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Psychic Octopus on November 01, 2010, 12:40:11 AM
I, the Magistrate of the Parish of Saint Andrew, do hereby decree that a national harbor shall be built at the so aptly named Murray Harbour.

For my second decree, I decree that roads shall be built between Murray Harbour, Murray River, Albion, and Gaspereaux.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on November 01, 2010, 01:02:21 AM
What is the purpose of counties? There is no government at the county level: all government is handled either by the Parishes or by the national government. So what duties, responsibilities, powers, and rights are held by the counties?


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 01, 2010, 01:24:25 AM
I, the Magistrate of the Parish of Saint Andrew, do hereby decree that a national harbor shall be built at the so aptly named Murray Harbour.

For my second decree, I decree that roads shall be built between Murray Harbour, Murray River, Albion, and Gaspereaux.
you should do this in the actions thread


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese on November 01, 2010, 04:06:41 AM
My fellow senators, as you all know I rencently returned from an expedition to investigate the situation in Princeton. I was unfortuntaley stopped by a roadblock from properly entering the town. It is my fear, that when not even a good Bishop of right hounarble church is allowed enterance to the city, something really fishy is going on, and I therefore ask for your and national govement's premission to have a melitia take it by force.   


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on November 01, 2010, 04:20:10 AM
You know what, I'm going to go to Princeton myself to see what the hell is going on over there.  This is getting way too weird.

I'm taking the whole damn militia with me, both the old Egmont and the Halifax.  That should be enough to scare those guards.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: homelycooking on November 01, 2010, 07:26:20 AM
You know what, I'm going to go to Princeton myself to see what the hell is going on over there.  This is getting way too weird.

I'm taking the whole damn militia with me, both the old Egmont and the Halifax.  That should be enough to scare those guards.

The Provost urgently inquires as to whether you will use force to seize the town if you are denied access. He would not approve of such an expedition if it is for the purpose of conquest, though he feels that the government of Princeton has clearly proven itself incapable of rule.



Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on November 01, 2010, 09:10:06 AM
You know what, I'm going to go to Princeton myself to see what the hell is going on over there.  This is getting way too weird.

I'm taking the whole damn militia with me, both the old Egmont and the Halifax.  That should be enough to scare those guards.

The Provost urgently inquires as to whether you will use force to seize the town if you are denied access. He would not approve of such an expedition if it is for the purpose of conquest, though he feels that the government of Princeton has clearly proven itself incapable of rule.



I am not there for conquest purposes.  Simply, the idea of sending the entire militia was to scare away the guards so I could enter the city personally.

Sadly that doesn't seem to be working out to well.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese on November 01, 2010, 09:18:51 AM
You know what, I'm going to go to Princeton myself to see what the hell is going on over there.  This is getting way too weird.

I'm taking the whole damn militia with me, both the old Egmont and the Halifax.  That should be enough to scare those guards.

The Provost urgently inquires as to whether you will use force to seize the town if you are denied access. He would not approve of such an expedition if it is for the purpose of conquest, though he feels that the government of Princeton has clearly proven itself incapable of rule.



I am not there for conquest purposes.  Simply, the idea of sending the entire militia was to scare away the guards so I could enter the city personally.

Sadly that doesn't seem to be working out to well.

If there are any problems my militia is standing ready at Lot 18 and will be there to assist you as soon as you need it. If the Princeton militia continues trying to keep us away I'm afraid we will have no other choice but to take the city by armed force. If both our militias work together we could probably defeat the corrupt guards quite easily and with minimal bloodshed.

 


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Bacon King on November 01, 2010, 09:29:56 AM
The people of Princeton have no access to the outside world and no method of producing food. We have a humanitarian crisis on our hands, gentlemen. While I would oppose any annexation of Princeton I believe that force is morally required here.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on November 01, 2010, 09:36:25 AM
If there are any problems my militia is standing ready at Lot 18 and will be there to assist you as soon as you need it. If the Princeton militia continues trying to keep us away I'm afraid we will have no other choice but to take the city by armed force. If both our militias work together we could probably defeat the corrupt guards quite easily and with minimal bloodshed.


The people of Princeton have no access to the outside world and no method of producing food. We have a humanitarian crisis on our hands, gentlemen. While I would oppose any annexation of Princeton I believe that force is morally required here.

I want to make this clear.  There has been no bloodshed on this island, and I intend to keep it that way.

That being said, I will talk to the guards personally and "persuade" them to let me in (flanked by all my men of course).  If worse comes to worse, I'll either gag them or go with Trojan Horse.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 01, 2010, 11:17:59 AM
I wish the excursion to Princeton all the best.

Also, I think we should revisit my national bank idea. It'd be better for business and all consumers on the island and open up the possibility of using paper money.

It should also be noted at this time that the inflation of £ continues, while the inflation of € is begging to get out of hand, with it becoming very difficult to even purchase one.

$ meanwhile is seeing price deflation, which only pushes up the value of the other two currencies.

Some assembly members are proposing to "de-currency" €, to only keep it for it's value as gold. Others want to do the same to £ as well.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: homelycooking on November 01, 2010, 11:51:02 AM
The Provost is receptive to the idea of a single, non-convertible paper currency standard to replace the current scheme which is wreaking havoc upon our island's economy.

However, the Provost feels that a National Bank, if it is to be incorporated, must be devised in a way so as to grant to the interests of farmers and of rural parishes the right to veto any bank policies. The Provost recognizes the Mayor of Charlottetown's desire to promote and stabilize commerce, and shares it, but will not permit the farmers of this island to be overrun and subjugated by a Bank that could be reasonably expected to serve as a tool of speculators, industrialists and mercantilists.

Regarding the Princeton crisis, the Provost wishes to express his horror at the squalor and dysfunction of the town, and encourages the Director of Halifax and the Bishop of Saint David to use any means necessary short of siege and warfare to re-establish magnanimous Christian rule over the people of Princeton.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on November 01, 2010, 05:08:47 PM
Regarding the Princeton crisis, the Provost wishes to express his horror at the squalor and dysfunction of the town, and encourages the Director of Halifax and the Bishop of Saint David to use any means necessary short of siege and warfare to re-establish magnanimous Christian rule over the people of Princeton.

I am doing my best to diffuse the situation.  However, I will challenge the idea of "Christian" rule, as I do not wish for this to be a Christian nation (we were thrown back in time, remember?  Which means we still have the ideals of modern society)


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese on November 02, 2010, 02:58:52 AM
Regarding the Princeton crisis, the Provost wishes to express his horror at the squalor and dysfunction of the town, and encourages the Director of Halifax and the Bishop of Saint David to use any means necessary short of siege and warfare to re-establish magnanimous Christian rule over the people of Princeton.

I am doing my best to diffuse the situation.  However, I will challenge the idea of "Christian" rule, as I do not wish for this to be a Christian nation (we were thrown back in time, remember?  Which means we still have the ideals of modern society)

Heretic! :P


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 02, 2010, 03:38:49 AM
Statement from the King
I have a headache and am tired.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 03, 2010, 02:56:36 AM
still a bit burnt out from the election and other things. I can do simple actions, or actions for which I already have a planned conclusion (princeton) but anything that requires calculations and costings will have to, sadly, wait another day.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on November 03, 2010, 03:09:44 AM
still a bit burnt out from the election and other things. I can do simple actions, or actions for which I already have a planned conclusion (princeton) but anything that requires calculations and costings will have to, sadly, wait another day.

(The election burned me too, Teddy...)

The Chancellor wishes to express his irritation that the Senate is seemingly impotent in its ability to enact legislation. He wishes that the situation in Princeton would be resolved quickly, so that the Senate may focus its attention on other pressing matters, like the currency crisis.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on November 03, 2010, 08:39:34 AM
still a bit burnt out from the election and other things. I can do simple actions, or actions for which I already have a planned conclusion (princeton) but anything that requires calculations and costings will have to, sadly, wait another day.

Breaking kayfabe: Can we just end the Princeton storyline?


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 03, 2010, 09:24:51 PM
Clue: The situation will not end without some sort violence.

I've also been informed by many of our inactive leaders that they wish to quit. Therefore I think the only the active leaders are around - I will be working up a workaround for the fact that 5 of you are packed in tightly.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on November 03, 2010, 10:54:12 PM
Can I just have my men knock out the guards?


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 04, 2010, 01:42:28 AM
you should you want to try that


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on November 04, 2010, 01:51:03 AM
Just do it already!


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on November 04, 2010, 01:52:04 AM
Yeah, probably a good idea.

I'm ordering two of my men to do that.:P


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on November 04, 2010, 02:09:50 PM
The Chancellor of Bedford is visiting relatives over the weekend. During the period between now and Sunday evening (November 7th), he may be unable to attend to matters of state. However, he issues a statement that he would be most displeased if his road from Mount Stewart to North Bedford Docks has not been constructed upon his return.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 05, 2010, 04:46:24 PM
REQUEST: Vacation

TIME: 36 hours

RATIONALE: drunk


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 05, 2010, 04:47:35 PM
No, the game is NOT dead, but, I need to figure out for sure who is still with us before I go any further. Plus, I'm drunk.

I'm giving BK to the end of my "vacation" to respond, otherwise, I am presuming the only Bedford, St.David, Halifax, and the two in the middle are still around.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on November 05, 2010, 10:23:37 PM

With all due respect, the Chancellor feels that the king's intoxication does not set a good example for his subjects, particularly those who hold leadership positions themselves. :P

Statement from the King
I have a headache and am tired.

A related incident, perhaps?


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on November 07, 2010, 07:40:52 PM
The Chancellor of Bedford announces that he has returned to his home in Rosebank, and is now able to devote his full attention to matters of state. When he discovered that the road from Mount Stewart to North Bedford Docks was not yet complete, he was very angry. He sacked all of the road workers on the spot and hired new ones.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese on November 08, 2010, 03:19:39 AM
I'm still hear King Teddy


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Bacon King on November 08, 2010, 11:00:55 AM
Still here. Been busy with work, but here.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: homelycooking on November 08, 2010, 12:40:45 PM
The Provost wishes to inform the King that he is present, but growing somewhat impatient with inaction on the island.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on November 08, 2010, 01:18:07 PM
The Provost wishes to inform the King that he is present, but growing somewhat impatient with inaction on the island.

The Chancellor echoes the Provost's sentiments- he would really like to get things moving.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on November 08, 2010, 09:26:59 PM
The Director would like for the King to appoint a pro-tempore when he's out on a drinking binge.:)


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on November 09, 2010, 05:13:02 AM
Having received no response from the Mayor of Charlottetown, I assume that I do not have the Mayor's permission to proceed with my request. When I next see him in the Senate chamber, I inform him that a simple refusal would have been more courteous.

Having received no response from the Reeve of Charlotte or his Deputy Senator regarding the possibility of ferry service from Cornwall to Rosebank, I assume that Charlotte parish has severed all ties with Bedford. I regret their decision in this matter, and make it clear that Bedford is always open to diplomatic negotiations.

Since the road from Mount Stewart to North Bedford Docks is not yet complete, I assume that there is a problem which prevents its completion. I investigate the matter personally.

As the siege of Princeton enters its ninth day, with no news having reached Rosebank, I take ten militiamen to Princeton to investigate that matter personally as well.

Finally, I write a formal letter to the king in which I express my increasing concern over his recent lack of executive action. I warn that if the king continues to neglect the needs of his subjects, I shall resign from my post in protest.

(This post translates to "Let's play the game, already!")


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 12, 2010, 03:53:12 PM
I forgot about this. I'll get everything up to speed in a bit.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on November 12, 2010, 05:51:52 PM
I forgot about this. I'll get everything up to speed in a bit.

I was about to give up on you.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on November 13, 2010, 10:01:15 PM
I forgot about this. I'll get everything up to speed in a bit.

Well?


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: homelycooking on November 14, 2010, 07:00:23 PM
Teddy: you've got 48 hours. Otherwise, I'm out.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on November 14, 2010, 07:13:11 PM
I'll probably play no matter when you decide to come back, but I am beginning to get just a little bit pissed at you, Teddy.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 15, 2010, 04:20:17 AM
give me a few days


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Bacon King on November 15, 2010, 10:44:19 AM
For the record, I've been waiting before Teddy gets back and does things to do things myself, because I don't want us to get ahead of him. Hence my lack of a response to anything earlier :)


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on November 15, 2010, 02:58:00 PM
For the record, I've been waiting before Teddy gets back and does things to do things myself, because I don't want us to get ahead of him. Hence my lack of a response to anything earlier :)

Initially I did the same thing. Then I figured that maybe Teddy forgot that there were already some actions being taken, so I posted a little reminder.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: homelycooking on November 18, 2010, 07:39:34 PM
We're still waiting, Teddy.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on November 18, 2010, 08:13:49 PM


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on November 21, 2010, 08:47:43 PM


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on November 22, 2010, 07:37:28 PM
Have you guys tried PMing him?  That usually results in an answer. :P


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on November 22, 2010, 08:51:43 PM

That's how I got him to respond last time. He PMed me back, saying that he'll update, then he posted on this board asking for a few more days. I haven't heard from him since. Maybe if we all PM him, he'll get off his ass and do something.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 23, 2010, 01:51:13 AM
this
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=120461.msg2730067#msg2730067


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: homelycooking on November 23, 2010, 02:14:56 PM
sh**t. I'm sorry, Teddy. Would you like me (or someone else) to take over for you?


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on November 23, 2010, 05:30:14 PM
I'm so sorry, man! Please don't take what I said the wrong way, I thought you were just being a jerk. If there's anything I can do, please don't hesitate to ask.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on November 24, 2010, 10:05:37 AM
I am sorry for this my friend.  It there's anything you need, lemme know.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on April 10, 2011, 09:24:15 PM
This game is coming back to life in a new incarnation - mixed with another game idea of mine.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: homelycooking on April 11, 2011, 07:52:03 AM
Yes, yes, yes! :D

I can't wait to start calling myself "Provost" again! Even Vazdul stuck out the six months of waiting with "Chancellor" as his display name.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on April 11, 2011, 11:16:42 AM
Yes, yes, yes! :D

I can't wait to start calling myself "Provost" again! Even Vazdul stuck out the six months of waiting with "Chancellor" as his display name.

Mostly because I'm too lazy to switch it back. ;)

I'm very excited about playing this again. It's sort of like a cross between the roleplaying aspect of D&D and a political simulation. As a person who enjoys both of those types of games, the uniqueness of this game holds my interest very well.

I know that we were originally supposed to act as we would in the position of parish leader, but as we've played the Chancellor has drifted away from me in his motivations and to some extent his political ideals as well. Dealing with the Chancellor is not the same as dealing with me.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on April 12, 2011, 08:13:56 AM
The game wont begin until May 6th, as I'll be busy following real-world elections until that time.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on April 12, 2011, 08:49:16 AM
The game wont begin until May 6th, as I'll be busy following real-world elections until that time.

That's fine, as I'll be on vacation all next week.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on April 20, 2011, 12:17:42 AM
The Chancellor and BK have expressed an interest in continuing, and will be given first preference in the next game.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: homelycooking on April 22, 2011, 08:16:16 PM
The Chancellor and BK have expressed an interest in continuing, and will be given first preference in the next game.

And not me? :(


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on April 23, 2011, 12:33:33 PM
The game wont begin until May 6th, as I'll be busy following real-world elections until that time.

That's fine, as I'll be on vacation all next week.

I have returned from my vacation, and am ready to start at any time.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on April 23, 2011, 11:58:03 PM
The Chancellor and BK have expressed an interest in continuing, and will be given first preference in the next game.

And not me? :(

Sure, you too


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on April 30, 2011, 09:31:17 PM
So, the game will be structured as such, in basic.

Like the other island game, you guys appeared on PEI and don't know what the heck is up.

The difference is that you've all been here for 5 years and have built a civilization.

The island has somewhere around a medieval tech level. There is a "Senate" which is elected. The distribution of powers has not yet been settled upon, so there is much room for conflict. You can/do control a parish, but at the same time, your control can be disputed.

Each Parish elects 3 Senators.

More to come.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on May 01, 2011, 02:36:51 PM
May I keep my reluctant expansionist military power? :D


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Bacon King on May 01, 2011, 04:27:45 PM
Dibs on the same province, if the system stays the same.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on May 01, 2011, 06:14:28 PM
Dibs on the same province, if the system stays the same.

Same here, without Egmont please.  I don't need Alberton *****ing at me again.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 01, 2011, 08:38:53 PM
The "Royal" areas (like Charlottetown) will become under Federal control, so you'd have to pick a new parish. Also a map soon.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 01, 2011, 08:54:30 PM
I don't think it even needs to be mentioned that I still want Bedford.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Cincinnatus on May 01, 2011, 08:56:41 PM
I'm just going to claim the title Commander.  I'll leave the rest up to Teddy :)


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 01, 2011, 09:00:53 PM
()

These will be the new parishes.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 01, 2011, 09:02:13 PM
Bedford, Halifax, and Grenville? have clainants.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: homelycooking on May 01, 2011, 09:08:39 PM
Bedford, Halifax, and Grenville? have clainants.

You're quite correct in insinuating that the Noble and Majestic Provost should wish to reassert his claim to the Parish of Grenville. ;D


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on May 01, 2011, 11:55:34 PM

Isn't Egmont to my left? ???


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 02, 2011, 12:24:16 AM
Not anymore!


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on May 02, 2011, 12:28:26 AM

They're not going to have another crappy leader are they?  Because if they are, I might as well just lay siege to whatever the hell their capital is once the game starts.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 02, 2011, 12:49:25 AM

They're not going to have another crappy leader are they?  Because if they are, I might as well just lay siege to whatever the hell their capital is once the game starts.

Why don't you give, say, St. John or St. Patrick a crappy leader? The Chancellor would love to have an excuse to annex some territory...

Er... I mean... The Chancellor is committed to the welfare of the people of Bedford Parish.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on May 02, 2011, 06:12:40 PM

They're not going to have another crappy leader are they?  Because if they are, I might as well just lay siege to whatever the hell their capital is once the game starts.

Why don't you give, say, St. John or St. Patrick a crappy leader? The Chancellor would love to have an excuse to annex some territory...

Er... I mean... The Chancellor is committed to the welfare of the people of Bedford Parish.

Because it worked so well when I took over Egmont.::)


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 02, 2011, 07:23:43 PM
Think less of your own fiefdoms and more of the national government. It will play a much larger role this round.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 02, 2011, 08:49:45 PM
Think less of your own fiefdoms and more of the national government. It will play a much larger role this round.

Depending on how much of a larger role, the Chancellor may end up quite different politically from his previous incarnation, even though his personality and goals would remain the same.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Bacon King on May 06, 2011, 06:56:57 PM
I suppose I'll take St. George.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 06, 2011, 08:54:37 PM
()

MAP UPDATE!

A few lots changed hands.

This map is a modern one, and thus, includes incorporated towns.

Hillsborough lost one lot, but makes up for it with gains in the Charlottetown area. Grenville lost parts of a lot, but makes up for it with a new railway to what is now the only port with rail access on the north shore of the Central part of the Island (a good economic place to be). Bedford also gains one Charlottetown "burb"

I may make another change to Richmond and Egmont, depending.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Bacon King on May 06, 2011, 10:01:05 PM
you forgot to label Bedford


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 06, 2011, 10:14:43 PM
see page 21


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 07, 2011, 05:23:59 AM
x
see page 21


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 07, 2011, 05:26:24 AM
()

This map should be final. I don't see any reason to make any changes.
The map is a "blank" map that I can edit very easily, and hence, very good for making the game easier to GM.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 07, 2011, 05:27:24 AM
CENSUS OF THE ABOVE
STATS - POPULATION - NAME - ASSEMBLY SEATS (Total: 126 seats)

CTY   -   16,157   -   Charlottetown    -   11
CTY   -   8,023   -   Summerside   -   6
TWN   -   4,009   -   Stratford   -   3
TWN   -   3,001   -   Cornwall   -   2
TWN   -   1,497   -   Cavendish   -   1
TWN   -   1,426   -   Montague   -   1
LOT   -   1,411   -   Lot 34   -   1 etc...
LOT   -   1,294   -   Lot 65
LOT   -   1,210   -   Lot 1
LOT   -   1,203   -   Lot 19
LOT   -   1,186   -   Lot 48
LOT   -   1,159   -   Lot 2
TWN   -   1,156   -   Kensington
LOT   -   1,114   -   Lot 31
LOT   -   1,086   -   Lot 35
LOT   -   1,054   -   Lot 24
LOT   -   989   -   Lot 59
LOT   -   986   -   Lot 5
TWN   -   983   -   Souris
VLG   -   953   -   Miltonvale Park
LOT   -   952   -   Lot 4
LOT   -   942   -   Lot 15
TWN   -   916   -   Alberton
LOT   -   915   -   Lot 25
LOT   -   901   -   Lot 49
LOT   -   890   -   Lot 33
LOT   -   872   -   Lot 57
LOT   -   859   -   Lot 18
LOT   -   842   -   Lot 26
LOT   -   833   -   Lot 63
LOT   -   826   -   Lot 64
LOT   -   810   -   Lot 29
LOT   -   805   -   Lot 21
LOT   -   793   -   Lot 3
LOT   -   786   -   Lot 52
LOT   -   783   -   Lot 44
LOT   -   780   -   Lot 6
LOT   -   776   -   Lot 23
LOT   -   773   -   Lot 28
LOT   -   771   -   Lot 50
LOT   -   770   -   Lot 67
LOT   -   768   -   Lot 12
VLG   -   767   -   O'Leary
VLG   -   746   -   Tignish
LOT   -   741   -   Lot 61
LOT   -   740   -   Lot 27
LOT   -   731   -   Lot 43
LOT   -   729   -   Lot 20
VLG   -   727   -   Borden
LOT   -   719   -   Lot 51
LOT   -   711   -   Lot 14
LOT   -   707   -   Lot 30
VLG   -   704   -   Miscouche
LOT   -   700   -   Lot 36
LOT   -   666   -   Lot 13
TWN   -   665   -   Georgetown
LOT   -   619   -   Lot 16
LOT   -   609   -   Lot 8
VLG   -   597   -   Rustico
LOT   -   590   -   Lot 39
VLG   -   581   -   Clyde River
LOT   -   540   -   Lot 47
LOT   -   534   -   Lot 7
LOT   -   527   -   Lot 22
LOT   -   523   -   Lot 17
LOT   -   518   -   Lot 37
LOT   -   511   -   Lot 58
LOT   -   510   -   Lot 11
LOT   -   508   -   Lot 62
VLG   -   502   -   Victoria
LOT   -   498   -   Lot 38
LOT   -   484   -   Lot 40
LOT   -   479   -   Lot 45
LOT   -   465   -   Lot 56
LOT   -   453   -   Lot 41
VLG   -   447   -   Murray River
LOT   -   444   -   Lot 55
LOT   -   438   -   Lot 54
LOT   -   432   -   Lot 53
VLG   -   422   -   Wellington
LOT   -   413   -   Lot 9
LOT   -   412   -   Lot 46
VLG   -   411   -   Cardigan
VLG   -   401   -   Meadowbank
VLG   -   397   -   Brackley
VLG   -   396   -   Murray Harbour
VLG   -   394   -   Hunter River
VLG   -   387   -   Abrams Village
VLG   -   386   -   Warren Grove
VLG   -   384   -   Bedeque
VLG   -   378   -   Linkletter
VLG   -   377   -   Morell
VLG   -   373   -   Kinkora
VLG   -   361   -   Mount Stewart
LOT   -   360   -   Lot 60
LOT   -   358   -   Lot 42
LOT   -   351   -   Lot 10
LOT   -   347   -   Kings, Royalty
VLG   -   330   -   St. Peters
VLG   -   328   -   Union Road
VLG   -   322   -   Winsloe South
VLG   -   309   -   Tyne Valley
VLG   -   280   -   Miminegash
VLG   -   270   -   Sherbrooke
VLG   -   265   -   Breadalbane
LOT   -   208   -   Lot 66   -   1 etc...
VLG   -   124   -   St. Louis   -   1
VLG   -   110   -   Wood Island   -   1
LOT   -   15   -   Governor's Island   -   0
LOT   -   9   -   Prince Royalty   -   0


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 07, 2011, 06:14:49 AM
      17,193   -   CHARLOTTE PARISH      
CTY   -   16,157   -   Charlottetown    -   11
TWN   -   665   -   Georgetown   -   1
LOT   -   347   -   Kings, Royalty   -   1
LOT   -   15   -   Governor's Island   -   0
LOT   -   9   -   Prince Royalty   -   0
                  
                  
      12,804   -   RICHMOND PARISH      
CTY   -   8,023   -   Summerside   -   6
TWN   -   1,156   -   Kensington   -   1
VLG   -   378   -   Linkletter   -   1
VLG   -   270   -   Sherbrooke   -   1
LOT   -   1,203   -   Lot 19   -   1
LOT   -   915   -   Lot 25   -   1
LOT   -   859   -   Lot 18   -   1
                  
                  
      10,500   -   BEDFORD PARISH      
TWN   -   4,009   -   Stratford   -   3
VLG   -   361   -   Mount Stewart   -   1
VLG   -   328   -   Union Road   -   1
LOT   -   1,411   -   Lot 34   -   1
LOT   -   1,186   -   Lot 48   -   1
LOT   -   1,086   -   Lot 35   -   1
LOT   -   901   -   Lot 49   -   1
LOT   -   700   -   Lot 36   -   1
LOT   -   518   -   Lot 37   -   1
                  
                  
      8,759   -   HILLSBOROUGH PARISH      
TWN   -   3,001   -   Cornwall   -   2
VLG   -   953   -   Miltonvale Park   -   1
VLG   -   581   -   Clyde River   -   1
VLG   -   401   -   Meadowbank   -   1
VLG   -   386   -   Warren Grove   -   1
VLG   -   322   -   Winsloe   -   1
LOT   -   1,294   -   Lot 65   -   1
LOT   -   1,114   -   Lot 31   -   1
LOT   -   707   -   Lot 30   -   1
                  
                  
      7,666   -   GRENVILLE PARISH      
TWN   -   1,497   -   Cavendish   -   1
VLG   -   597   -   Rustico   -   1
VLG   -   397   -   Brackley   -   1
VLG   -   394   -   Hunter River   -   1
LOT   -   1,054   -   Lot 24   -   1
LOT   -   890   -   Lot 33   -   1
LOT   -   805   -   Lot 21   -   1
LOT   -   776   -   Lot 23   -   1
LOT   -   729   -   Lot 20   -   1
LOT   -   527   -   Lot 22   -   1
                  
                  
      6,960   -   NORTH PARISH      
TWN   -   916   -   Alberton   -   1
VLG   -   746   -   Tignish   -   1
VLG   -   280   -   Miminegash   -   1
VLG   -   124   -   St. Louis   -   1
LOT   -   1,210   -   Lot 1   -   1
LOT   -   1,159   -   Lot 2   -   1
LOT   -   952   -   Lot 4   -   1
LOT   -   793   -   Lot 3   -   1
LOT   -   780   -   Lot 6   -   1
                  
                  
      6,186   -   ST DAVID PARISH      
VLG   -   727   -   Borden   -   1
VLG   -   502   -   Victoria   -   1
VLG   -   384   -   Bedeque   -   1
VLG   -   373   -   Kinkora   -   1
VLG   -   265   -   Breadalbane   -   1
LOT   -   842   -   Lot 26   -   1
LOT   -   810   -   Lot 29   -   1
LOT   -   773   -   Lot 28   -   1
LOT   -   770   -   Lot 67   -   1
LOT   -   740   -   Lot 27   -   1
                  
                  
      5,329   -   ST GEORGE PARISH      
TWN   -   1,426   -   Montague   -   1
VLG   -   411   -   Cardigan   -   1
LOT   -   786   -   Lot 52   -   1
LOT   -   719   -   Lot 51   -   1
LOT   -   465   -   Lot 56   -   1
LOT   -   444   -   Lot 55   -   1
LOT   -   438   -   Lot 54   -   1
LOT   -   432   -   Lot 53   -   1
LOT   -   208   -   Lot 66   -   1
                  
                  
      5,283   -   EGMONT PARISH      
VLG   -   704   -   Miscouche   -   1
VLG   -   422   -   Wellington   -   1
VLG   -   387   -   Abrams Village   -   1
VLG   -   309   -   Tyne Valley   -   1
LOT   -   942   -   Lot 15   -   1
LOT   -   711   -   Lot 14   -   1
LOT   -   666   -   Lot 13   -   1
LOT   -   619   -   Lot 16   -   1
LOT   -   523   -   Lot 17   -   1
                  
                  
      4,938   -   HALIFAX PARISH      
VLG   -   767   -   O'Leary   -   1
LOT   -   986   -   Lot 5   -   1
LOT   -   768   -   Lot 12   -   1
LOT   -   609   -   Lot 8   -   1
LOT   -   534   -   Lot 7   -   1
LOT   -   510   -   Lot 11   -   1
LOT   -   413   -   Lot 9   -   1
LOT   -   351   -   Lot 10   -   1
                  
                  
      4,232   -   ST ANDREW PARISH      
VLG   -   447   -   Murray River   -   1
VLG   -   396   -   Murray Harbour   -   1
LOT   -   989   -   Lot 59   -   1
LOT   -   833   -   Lot 63   -   1
LOT   -   826   -   Lot 64   -   1
LOT   -   741   -   Lot 61   -   1

               
      3,928   -   EAST PARISH      
TWN   -   983   -   Souris   -   1
LOT   -   783   -   Lot 44   -   1
LOT   -   731   -   Lot 43   -   1
LOT   -   540   -   Lot 47   -   1
LOT   -   479   -   Lot 45   -   1
LOT   -   412   -   Lot 46   -   1
                  
                  
      3,132   -   ST JOHN PARISH      
VLG   -   110   -   Wood Island   -   1
LOT   -   771   -   Lot 50   -   1
LOT   -   872   -   Lot 57   -   1
LOT   -   511   -   Lot 58   -   1
LOT   -   508   -   Lot 62   -   1
LOT   -   360   -   Lot 60   -   1
                  
                  
      3,090   -   ST PATRICK PARISH      
VLG   -   377   -   Morell   -   1
VLG   -   330   -   St. Peters   -   1
LOT   -   498   -   Lot 38   -   1
LOT   -   590   -   Lot 39   -   1
LOT   -   484   -   Lot 40   -   1
LOT   -   453   -   Lot 41   -   1
LOT   -   358   -   Lot 42   -   1


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 07, 2011, 06:43:39 AM
The Senate has 29 members. 2 from each parish (including "Charlotte Parish" which is run by the national government) and 1 seat for me, the Emperor of the Island.

Assembly seats are elected.

Senators are not elected, they are appointed by the Emperor, however the Emperor tends to appoint people whom the Assembly elect.

Each parish has it's own Assembly, made up of their National Assemblymen and Senators.

When in the National Assembly, members tend to vote in a bloc with the rest of their Parish, however inside each Parish, assembly members are much more independent and outspoken.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 07, 2011, 06:48:51 AM
In the event anyone missed it.

There are 4 "Magic Rooms" on the Island. They are made of an unknown material, that has proven indestructible, and is extremely light, making for easy transport.

Three of the rooms are identical. They are 15ft by 15ft by 15ft, and have 5 walls, with one open side. The open side is covered with a curtain that has also proven indestructible, and inflammable. On a regular interval, items can be requested from these magic rooms.

There is a 4th room that is much larger, 75ft by 75ft by 75ft, and requests can be made more often.

The three smaller rooms are located in each county capital, while the 4th room is located in Charlottetown.

The smaller rooms accept requests from the parishes, split equally among all parishes, while the larger room is controlled by the national government.

As you've all been here for a number of years, a number of things have already been requested, including most of the materials used to build the railroad, most rail equipment, and most locomotives/railcars etc.

Along the Rail lines, and, expanding to each town, is a telegraph like line. Each town has one laptop computer that can be used, among other things, for communication though this network. Text is the only way to do so. There is also a primitive electrical system in each town powered by solar panels and smaller windmills. There are batteries to store power when not in use.

Each parish has a diesel powered generator for use at will, and a supply of diesel. Currently, no natural sources of diesel have been found, and thus, all must be requested from the rooms. Diesel also powers all trains on the island.

Natural sources of Iron and other such things are on the Island despite the fact that no such things exist in the real world. Also, other areas near PEI such as New Brunswick are nowhere to be found. All there is there is ocean.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 07, 2011, 07:04:11 AM
A special note on RELIGION

Each leader will be required to pick one religion. The Island is divided between two religions.

Exactly 50% of the Island is Catholic.
Exactly 50% of the Island is Protestant.

Both religions are distributed around and there is not much of a geographic concentration to any great degree, though some lots can be as high as a 66%-33% split, though no higher.

Of the Protestants, 50% are United*, ~17% are Presbyterians,  ~17% are Anglican,  ~17% are Baptist.

*United  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Church_of_Canada)= Congregationalist, Methodists, and some Presbyterians.

Every leader must pick one religion and this will determine how your population reacts to you.



Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 07, 2011, 02:12:49 PM
In the event anyone missed it.

There are 4 "Magic Rooms" on the Island. They are made of an unknown material, that has proven indestructible, and is extremely light, making for easy transport.

Three of the rooms are identical. They are 15ft by 15ft by 15ft, and have 5 walls, with one open side. The open side is covered with a curtain that has also proven indestructible, and inflammable. On a regular interval, items can be requested from these magic rooms.

There is a 4th room that is much larger, 75ft by 75ft by 75ft, and requests can be made more often.

The three smaller rooms are located in each county capital, while the 4th room is located in Charlottetown.

The smaller rooms accept requests from the parishes, split equally among all parishes, while the larger room is controlled by the national government.

As you've all been here for a number of years, a number of things have already been requested, including most of the materials used to build the railroad, most rail equipment, and most locomotives/railcars etc.

Along the Rail lines, and, expanding to each town, is a telegraph like line. Each town has one laptop computer that can be used, among other things, for communication though this network. Text is the only way to do so. There is also a primitive electrical system in each town powered by solar panels and smaller windmills. There are batteries to store power when not in use.

Each parish has a diesel powered generator for use at will, and a supply of diesel. Currently, no natural sources of diesel have been found, and thus, all must be requested from the rooms. Diesel also powers all trains on the island.

Natural sources of Iron and other such things are on the Island despite the fact that no such things exist in the real world. Also, other areas near PEI such as New Brunswick are nowhere to be found. All there is there is ocean.

Just for clarification, Charlottetown is the capital of Queen's county, right? So Charlottetown has both the large room and a small room?

A special note on RELIGION

Each leader will be required to pick one religion. The Island is divided between two religions.

Exactly 50% of the Island is Catholic.
Exactly 50% of the Island is Protestant.

Both religions are distributed around and there is not much of a geographic concentration to any great degree, though some lots can be as high as a 66%-33% split, though no higher.

Of the Protestants, 50% are United*, ~17% are Presbyterians,  ~17% are Anglican,  ~17% are Baptist.

*United  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Church_of_Canada)= Congregationalist, Methodists, and some Presbyterians.

Every leader must pick one religion and this will determine how your population reacts to you.



Since the Chancellor sucked up to the Bishop last time, I'll roll with Catholic.


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 07, 2011, 07:56:50 PM
Yes, the small room is near the rail juncton, while the larger one is downtown, between the "Imperial Palace" and the "Parliament Building"


Title: PEI Game
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 07, 2011, 10:29:12 PM
()


()


()


()


Title: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 07, 2011, 10:29:53 PM
Actions and Decisions, as well as Senate debates, will be done here.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 07, 2011, 10:30:43 PM
CENSUS OF THE ABOVE
STATS - POPULATION - NAME - ASSEMBLY SEATS (Total: 126 seats)

CTY   -   16,157   -   Charlottetown    -   11
CTY   -   8,023   -   Summerside   -   6
TWN   -   4,009   -   Stratford   -   3
TWN   -   3,001   -   Cornwall   -   2
TWN   -   1,497   -   Cavendish   -   1
TWN   -   1,426   -   Montague   -   1
LOT   -   1,411   -   Lot 34   -   1 etc...
LOT   -   1,294   -   Lot 65
LOT   -   1,210   -   Lot 1
LOT   -   1,203   -   Lot 19
LOT   -   1,186   -   Lot 48
LOT   -   1,159   -   Lot 2
TWN   -   1,156   -   Kensington
LOT   -   1,114   -   Lot 31
LOT   -   1,086   -   Lot 35
LOT   -   1,054   -   Lot 24
LOT   -   989   -   Lot 59
LOT   -   986   -   Lot 5
TWN   -   983   -   Souris
VLG   -   953   -   Miltonvale Park
LOT   -   952   -   Lot 4
LOT   -   942   -   Lot 15
TWN   -   916   -   Alberton
LOT   -   915   -   Lot 25
LOT   -   901   -   Lot 49
LOT   -   890   -   Lot 33
LOT   -   872   -   Lot 57
LOT   -   859   -   Lot 18
LOT   -   842   -   Lot 26
LOT   -   833   -   Lot 63
LOT   -   826   -   Lot 64
LOT   -   810   -   Lot 29
LOT   -   805   -   Lot 21
LOT   -   793   -   Lot 3
LOT   -   786   -   Lot 52
LOT   -   783   -   Lot 44
LOT   -   780   -   Lot 6
LOT   -   776   -   Lot 23
LOT   -   773   -   Lot 28
LOT   -   771   -   Lot 50
LOT   -   770   -   Lot 67
LOT   -   768   -   Lot 12
VLG   -   767   -   O'Leary
VLG   -   746   -   Tignish
LOT   -   741   -   Lot 61
LOT   -   740   -   Lot 27
LOT   -   731   -   Lot 43
LOT   -   729   -   Lot 20
VLG   -   727   -   Borden
LOT   -   719   -   Lot 51
LOT   -   711   -   Lot 14
LOT   -   707   -   Lot 30
VLG   -   704   -   Miscouche
LOT   -   700   -   Lot 36
LOT   -   666   -   Lot 13
TWN   -   665   -   Georgetown
LOT   -   619   -   Lot 16
LOT   -   609   -   Lot 8
VLG   -   597   -   Rustico
LOT   -   590   -   Lot 39
VLG   -   581   -   Clyde River
LOT   -   540   -   Lot 47
LOT   -   534   -   Lot 7
LOT   -   527   -   Lot 22
LOT   -   523   -   Lot 17
LOT   -   518   -   Lot 37
LOT   -   511   -   Lot 58
LOT   -   510   -   Lot 11
LOT   -   508   -   Lot 62
VLG   -   502   -   Victoria
LOT   -   498   -   Lot 38
LOT   -   484   -   Lot 40
LOT   -   479   -   Lot 45
LOT   -   465   -   Lot 56
LOT   -   453   -   Lot 41
VLG   -   447   -   Murray River
LOT   -   444   -   Lot 55
LOT   -   438   -   Lot 54
LOT   -   432   -   Lot 53
VLG   -   422   -   Wellington
LOT   -   413   -   Lot 9
LOT   -   412   -   Lot 46
VLG   -   411   -   Cardigan
VLG   -   401   -   Meadowbank
VLG   -   397   -   Brackley
VLG   -   396   -   Murray Harbour
VLG   -   394   -   Hunter River
VLG   -   387   -   Abrams Village
VLG   -   387   -   Linkletter
VLG   -   386   -   Warren Grove
VLG   -   384   -   Bedeque
VLG   -   377   -   Morell
VLG   -   373   -   Kinkora
VLG   -   361   -   Mount Stewart
LOT   -   360   -   Lot 60
LOT   -   358   -   Lot 42
LOT   -   351   -   Lot 10
LOT   -   347   -   Kings, Royalty
VLG   -   330   -   St. Peters
VLG   -   328   -   Union Road
VLG   -   322   -   Winsloe South
VLG   -   309   -   Tyne Valley
VLG   -   280   -   Miminegash
VLG   -   270   -   Sherbrooke
VLG   -   265   -   Breadalbane
LOT   -   208   -   Lot 66   -   1 etc...
VLG   -   124   -   St. Louis   -   1
VLG   -   110   -   Wood Island   -   1
LOT   -   15   -   Governor's Island   -   0
LOT   -   9   -   Prince Royalty   -   0











      17,571   -   CHARLOTTE PARISH      
CTY   -   16,157   -   Charlottetown    -   11
TWN   -   665   -   Georgetown   -   1
LOT   -   347   -   Kings, Royalty   -   1
LOT   -   15   -   Governor's Island   -   0
VLG   -   387   -   Linkletter   -   1    
                  
      12,426  -   RICHMOND PARISH      
CTY   -   8,023   -   Summerside   -   6
TWN   -   1,156   -   Kensington   -   1
VLG   -   270   -   Sherbrooke   -   1
LOT   -   1,203   -   Lot 19   -   1
LOT   -   915   -   Lot 25   -   1
LOT   -   859   -   Lot 18   -   1
                  
                  
      10,500   -   BEDFORD PARISH      
TWN   -   4,009   -   Stratford   -   3
VLG   -   361   -   Mount Stewart   -   1
VLG   -   328   -   Union Road   -   1
LOT   -   1,411   -   Lot 34   -   1
LOT   -   1,186   -   Lot 48   -   1
LOT   -   1,086   -   Lot 35   -   1
LOT   -   901   -   Lot 49   -   1
LOT   -   700   -   Lot 36   -   1
LOT   -   518   -   Lot 37   -   1
                  
                  
      8,759   -   HILLSBOROUGH PARISH      
TWN   -   3,001   -   Cornwall   -   2
VLG   -   953   -   Miltonvale Park   -   1
VLG   -   581   -   Clyde River   -   1
VLG   -   401   -   Meadowbank   -   1
VLG   -   386   -   Warren Grove   -   1
VLG   -   322   -   Winsloe   -   1
LOT   -   1,294   -   Lot 65   -   1
LOT   -   1,114   -   Lot 31   -   1
LOT   -   707   -   Lot 30   -   1
                  
                  
      7,666   -   GRENVILLE PARISH      
TWN   -   1,497   -   Cavendish   -   1
VLG   -   597   -   Rustico   -   1
VLG   -   397   -   Brackley   -   1
VLG   -   394   -   Hunter River   -   1
LOT   -   1,054   -   Lot 24   -   1
LOT   -   890   -   Lot 33   -   1
LOT   -   805   -   Lot 21   -   1
LOT   -   776   -   Lot 23   -   1
LOT   -   729   -   Lot 20   -   1
LOT   -   527   -   Lot 22   -   1
                  
                  
      6,960   -   NORTH PARISH      
TWN   -   916   -   Alberton   -   1
VLG   -   746   -   Tignish   -   1
VLG   -   280   -   Miminegash   -   1
VLG   -   124   -   St. Louis   -   1
LOT   -   1,210   -   Lot 1   -   1
LOT   -   1,159   -   Lot 2   -   1
LOT   -   952   -   Lot 4   -   1
LOT   -   793   -   Lot 3   -   1
LOT   -   780   -   Lot 6   -   1
                  
                  
      6,186   -   ST DAVID PARISH      
VLG   -   727   -   Borden   -   1
VLG   -   502   -   Victoria   -   1
VLG   -   384   -   Bedeque   -   1
VLG   -   373   -   Kinkora   -   1
VLG   -   265   -   Breadalbane   -   1
LOT   -   842   -   Lot 26   -   1
LOT   -   810   -   Lot 29   -   1
LOT   -   773   -   Lot 28   -   1
LOT   -   770   -   Lot 67   -   1
LOT   -   740   -   Lot 27   -   1
                  
                  
      5,329   -   ST GEORGE PARISH      
TWN   -   1,426   -   Montague   -   1
VLG   -   411   -   Cardigan   -   1
LOT   -   786   -   Lot 52   -   1
LOT   -   719   -   Lot 51   -   1
LOT   -   465   -   Lot 56   -   1
LOT   -   444   -   Lot 55   -   1
LOT   -   438   -   Lot 54   -   1
LOT   -   432   -   Lot 53   -   1
LOT   -   208   -   Lot 66   -   1
                  
                  
      5,283   -   EGMONT PARISH      
VLG   -   704   -   Miscouche   -   1
VLG   -   422   -   Wellington   -   1
VLG   -   387   -   Abrams Village   -   1
VLG   -   309   -   Tyne Valley   -   1
LOT   -   942   -   Lot 15   -   1
LOT   -   711   -   Lot 14   -   1
LOT   -   666   -   Lot 13   -   1
LOT   -   619   -   Lot 16   -   1
LOT   -   523   -   Lot 17   -   1
                  
                  
      4,938   -   HALIFAX PARISH      
VLG   -   767   -   O'Leary   -   1
LOT   -   986   -   Lot 5   -   1
LOT   -   768   -   Lot 12   -   1
LOT   -   609   -   Lot 8   -   1
LOT   -   534   -   Lot 7   -   1
LOT   -   510   -   Lot 11   -   1
LOT   -   413   -   Lot 9   -   1
LOT   -   351   -   Lot 10   -   1
                  
                  
      4,232   -   ST ANDREW PARISH      
VLG   -   447   -   Murray River   -   1
VLG   -   396   -   Murray Harbour   -   1
LOT   -   989   -   Lot 59   -   1
LOT   -   833   -   Lot 63   -   1
LOT   -   826   -   Lot 64   -   1
LOT   -   741   -   Lot 61   -   1

              
      3,928   -   EAST PARISH      
TWN   -   983   -   Souris   -   1
LOT   -   783   -   Lot 44   -   1
LOT   -   731   -   Lot 43   -   1
LOT   -   540   -   Lot 47   -   1
LOT   -   479   -   Lot 45   -   1
LOT   -   412   -   Lot 46   -   1
                  
                  
      3,132   -   ST JOHN PARISH      
VLG   -   110   -   Wood Island   -   1
LOT   -   771   -   Lot 50   -   1
LOT   -   872   -   Lot 57   -   1
LOT   -   511   -   Lot 58   -   1
LOT   -   508   -   Lot 62   -   1
LOT   -   360   -   Lot 60   -   1
                  
                  
      3,090   -   ST PATRICK PARISH      
VLG   -   377   -   Morell   -   1
VLG   -   330   -   St. Peters   -   1
LOT   -   498   -   Lot 38   -   1
LOT   -   590   -   Lot 39   -   1
LOT   -   484   -   Lot 40   -   1
LOT   -   453   -   Lot 41   -   1
LOT   -   358   -   Lot 42   -   1


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 07, 2011, 10:33:21 PM
LAND
PEI is 1.4 million acres square.
18% of the land is used for farming or other activities, 82% is wooded.
Red Spruce, Balsam Fir, Maple, Yellow Birch
Mixed broadleaf and conifer stands.
Soils: Brunisolic, luvisolic; moraine,colluvium,marine.





The Senate has 29 members. 2 from each parish (including "Charlotte Parish" which is run by the national government) and 1 seat for me, the Emperor of the Island.

Assembly seats are elected.

Senators are not elected, they are appointed by the Emperor, however the Emperor tends to appoint people whom the Assembly elect.

Each parish has it's own Assembly, made up of their National Assemblymen and Senators.

When in the National Assembly, members tend to vote in a bloc with the rest of their Parish, however inside each Parish, assembly members are much more independent and outspoken.








There are 4 "Magic Rooms" on the Island. They are made of an unknown material, that has proven indestructible, and is extremely light, making for easy transport.

Three of the rooms are identical. They are 15ft by 15ft by 15ft, and have 5 walls, with one open side. The open side is covered with a curtain that has also proven indestructible, and inflammable. On a regular interval, items can be requested from these magic rooms.

There is a 4th room that is much larger, 75ft by 75ft by 75ft, and requests can be made more often.

The three smaller rooms are located in each county capital, while the 4th room is located in Charlottetown.

The smaller rooms accept requests from the parishes, split equally among all parishes, while the larger room is controlled by the national government.

As you've all been here for a number of years, a number of things have already been requested, including most of the materials used to build the railroad, most rail equipment, and most locomotives/railcars etc.

Along the Rail lines, and, expanding to each town, is a telegraph like line. Each town has one laptop computer that can be used, among other things, for communication though this network. Text is the only way to do so. There is also a primitive electrical system in each town powered by solar panels and smaller windmills. There are batteries to store power when not in use.

Each parish has a diesel powered generator for use at will, and a supply of diesel. Currently, no natural sources of diesel have been found, and thus, all must be requested from the rooms. Diesel also powers all trains on the island.

Natural sources of Iron and other such things are on the Island despite the fact that no such things exist in the real world. Also, other areas near PEI such as New Brunswick are nowhere to be found. All there is there is ocean.

Who created the rooms? Unknown, however, they can be spoken to, and the largest rooms "Rules" over the smaller ones, so that the owner/operator of the largest room can prohibit items from being requested from the smaller ones.




A special note on RELIGION

Each leader will be required to pick one religion. The Island is divided between two religions.

Exactly 50% of the Island is Catholic.
Exactly 50% of the Island is Protestant.

Both religions are distributed around and there is not much of a geographic concentration to any great degree, though some lots can be as high as a 66%-33% split, though no higher.

Of the Protestants, 50% are United*, ~17% are Presbyterians,  ~17% are Anglican,  ~17% are Baptist.

*United = Congregationalist, Methodists, and some Presbyterians.

Every leader must pick one religion and this will determine how your population reacts to you.






ELECTRICITY
Each village, town, and city, has a number of large windmills equal to the number of Rep's it has. Each also has a number of solar panels attached to various buildings. This is enough to provide about 10% of the real-world 2011 electricity needs of Prince Edward Island. Note that in the game, the Island has a population of exactly 100,000, and IRL, 141,000.

There is no "Electricity grid" to speak of. Outside of the towns, there is no electricity, except where private individuals and companies have purchased solar panels.






MATERIALS
Wood is the primary material for everything.




CURRENCY
There is no Nickel available anywhere on the Island, in addition, the National Government has banned the smaller rooms from creating them, thus, only the National Government may request and use Nickel. Currently, other than a small reserve, all Nickel is used in Currency.

All three: £ € $ are acceptable to use to refer to the Currency, though the Government itself prefers €.

The average daily income is 1€, compared to $150 canadian dollars, at current, in PEI. Every cent is therefore about equal to $1.50 Canadian.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 07, 2011, 10:35:01 PM
BUDGET

Government revenue comes from 3 sources. Taxes, the sale of Electricity, and the sale of goods from the Magic Rooms.

There are two taxes on the Island.

TITHES
10% of all income earned. This is collected 4 times a year, at the start of each season. The National Government administers the collection of the tax, and remits 9/10ths of all revenue to the parish from which they originated.

PROPERTY TITHES
10% of the of all items owned; with "The first 9 of every 10 exempt". This means an effective rate of 1% not 10%. Most items are taxed individually, for example, 100 cows is taxes as cows, and hence, the tax owing is 1 cow, and not the value of 1 cow in €

Not all items are taxed. All foodstuffs are taxed at harvest time. Animals are taxed, however do to the wording of the law, anyone with less than 99 of any particular animal, can avoid the tax.

Land is taxed, based on it's value. All of these taxes are collected by the national government, and 10% of the revenue raised is sent back to the parish from which it originated.



Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 07, 2011, 10:36:48 PM
The trains used are of the 0-4-4 design

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0-4-4

Also known as a Forney

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forney_locomotive

()

http://www.forneymuseum.org/FE_Forney_Locomotive.html

The gauge of the rail across the Island is 1 metre - 1000mm - 3ft 3+3/8in


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 07, 2011, 10:37:36 PM
http://www.otherpower.com/steamengine.shtml
2000W generator


TV - 50W
Fridge - 110W (with freezer)
Microwave - 1150W
Laptop - 25W


Title: Re: PEI - Island Wide Government and News
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 07, 2011, 10:38:02 PM
--> https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=135359.0


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 07, 2011, 10:46:26 PM
I've also decided that Mayor of Charlottetown WILL be a playable position, but, the powers of said position are somewhat limited.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 07, 2011, 10:58:14 PM
Placeholder 5 of 5

You may post your religion choice.

In case you missed it in the other thread, I chose Catholic.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 08, 2011, 06:17:20 AM
http://goo.gl/maps/wl0y A fun map I'm working on, or, was, until Google Maps decided to stop co-operating. The basics are all there, but I do plan to betterify the map.

Also, a Charlottetown map!

()

Note the road map underneith it is not accurate to the game.

Red outlines the Boroughs within Charlottetown. The numbers in each determine how many Assemblymen they elect. This is an indication of population.

Green is the Rail line.

Charlottetown - 8,500
Parkdale - 3,000
Sherwood - 2,000
West Royalty - 1,750
East Royalty - 1,000
Winsloe - 750


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 08, 2011, 06:36:53 AM
Similar map of Summerside

()

Summerside - 5,000
St. Eleanors - 2,000
Wilmot - 1,250
Sherbrooke - 750


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Bacon King on May 08, 2011, 07:29:15 AM
I'm very interested in returning as mayor of Charlottetown. What limitations would I have, exactly?


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 08, 2011, 08:29:25 AM
Not yet decided. There are certain things you'd clearly not be able to do, like parish-to-parish relations, but in terms of "domestic" things within your parish, you'd have just as much power as the others do.

You'd also be Mayor of Charlottetown and thus have no Limited say in other areas of "Charlotte Parish" - You'd be a member of the "Legislature" of the parish, though, and may try to extend your influence in this way. You would also remain a Senator.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: homelycooking on May 08, 2011, 09:42:29 AM
The Provost of Grenville is Catholic.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 09, 2011, 01:20:24 AM
Anyone else want to play? Remember that St.George is still temporarily reserved in case BK wants to go there, as is the Mayorship of Charlottetown.

Richmond Parish will also remain reserved until after the game begins as there may or may not be a crisis here *tries to look innocent*


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: bullmoose88 on May 09, 2011, 01:24:35 AM
Erm.  What exactly would one have to do?


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 09, 2011, 02:27:50 AM
Lots! You are effectively like a governor of a part of the island. The difference is that you could go to "war" with other governors, though this is discouraged of course. Don't get into this thinking it's a wargame. It's a combo of a wargame and a political simulation.

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=126923.0
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=127263.0

Thumb through these to see how the last round progressed


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 09, 2011, 02:42:35 AM
Anyone else want to play? Remember that St.George is still temporarily reserved in case BK wants to go there, as is the Mayorship of Charlottetown.

Richmond Parish will also remain reserved until after the game begins as there may or may not be a crisis here *tries to look innocent*

Time to get into character...

Statement from the Chancellor
"I am deeply disturbed by the growing unrest in Richmond Parish. I urge the Parish's illustrious leader to take steps to bring the situation under control. The Parish of Bedford is prepared to do whatever it can to assist in this matter, should such assistance be required."


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 09, 2011, 02:47:56 AM
The game has not started yet (another day or two), and nobody said the problems the parish would cause come from within the parish ;)


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 09, 2011, 03:00:35 AM
The game has not started yet (another day or two), and nobody said the problems the parish would cause come from within the parish ;)

Well, as you can see, I'm obviously quite itching to get started. :P


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 09, 2011, 03:04:16 AM
If you can scan this thread and the old ones and point out anything I'm missing (like more currency info, or a map showing travel times - things I am working on) it will help me get going faster.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 09, 2011, 03:58:36 AM
The first motion before the Senate is a debate on the possibility of creating a single unified National electricity grid - including, of course, more generating capacity.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 09, 2011, 08:14:25 AM
I've updated the rail map to be more true-to-life.

I've also created a Religion map. Remember it's not too late to change your religion.

One of the reasons these things take so long is that I use real data. This is a real true-to-life religion map for PEI at current.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 09, 2011, 12:48:03 PM
I've updated the rail map to be more true-to-life.

I've also created a Religion map. Remember it's not too late to change your religion.

One of the reasons these things take so long is that I use real data. This is a real true-to-life religion map for PEI at current.

()

I see no reason to change...


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 09, 2011, 05:54:21 PM
The first motion before the Senate is a debate on the possibility of creating a single unified National electricity grid - including, of course, more generating capacity.

1. Is this just a debate, or is there an actual proposal?

2. Is the current electrical system run by the national government, or the parishes?


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 09, 2011, 05:57:38 PM
Is there a more efficient transportation link between Stratford and Charlottetown, or is the best route really by train via Mt. Stewart?


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 09, 2011, 06:27:35 PM
All wind generators are owned by the National Government, and sales from it are remitted to said government, however currently there are only generators in towns, and those are thus operated by said towns.

As for the debate, it is a bill before the Senate, and hence, will be what the Senate will be discussing when the game begins.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 09, 2011, 06:35:18 PM
There are roads everywhere and a roadmap will be published in a short time.

There is also a regular ferry route between Stratford and Charlottetown, as well as between both locations and Cornwall.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 09, 2011, 07:04:49 PM
An ethnic map has been added. Keep in mind this is the primary ethnicity, and that each area includes a mix of all ethnicities.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: homelycooking on May 09, 2011, 07:05:29 PM
The Provost of Grenville kindly requests that Emperor Teddy reprint and enlarge the maps in his original post.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 09, 2011, 07:07:42 PM
Right click, and click on open in new tab/window :P


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 09, 2011, 07:47:25 PM
What does yellow represent on the religion map?


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 09, 2011, 08:43:43 PM
Mix

Green is Catholic and Orange is Protestant.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 09, 2011, 09:56:45 PM
GAME BEGINS TOMORROW EVENING


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Cincinnatus on May 09, 2011, 10:08:18 PM
[23:08] <TheNewTeddy> well for now just post in the thread that you plan to play

This


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 10, 2011, 06:58:29 AM
GAME STARTS NOW


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 10, 2011, 07:02:08 AM
The Emperor (Speaker) of the Senate:

Statistics P.E.I. is still gathering the census data from the census that has been completed in the past month. Data will still be streaming in over the next little while.

Also, a congrats, we've now been here on this Island for 15 months.

Reminder that Senate meetings occur 4 times a month on Fridays, and that 4 times a year we sit for an entire week. This is an in-game statement, it means nothing for gameplay

Is there any new business?


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 10, 2011, 07:46:42 AM
Thank you, your majesty.

I would like to begin by stating that the gross underrepresentation of the more populated parts of the island in the Assembly is appalling. Lot 34, for instance, has nearly seven times the population of Lot 66, yet has the same amount of representation! I demand that this issue be addressed pending the receipt of the census data.

I cannot give my opinions on the current bill, as I've yet to see a copy, but I have a few concerns as to the cost. I am also concerned as to how much space would be required for the proposal. I've no intention of seeing Bedford's farmland inundated with windmills to suit the electricity needs of Charlottetown residents.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 10, 2011, 08:09:17 AM
Speaker
The decision was made of the last Senate that every 1,500 persons shall have an assemblyman, and also that each lot, and settlement, shall have at least one. Changes would need to apply to that bill.


2nd Senator, Bedford
As with my Chancellor, I am curious as to this national electricity bill. While 82% of our Island is woodland, we can not chop it all down. We'd need to use magic room requests to get the materials, what would this cost us in terms of loss of other room requests?


1st Senator, Richmond (Bill Mover)
We will need to examine this, of course, and I will instruct Senate Staff to look into this right away.


Speaker
The Clerk has data he would like to present.


Clerk
I present data regarding the budget of the past year.
Quote
Total Value of all owned Property = €30,240,000 After excemptions and rates, total property taxes collected, €302,400

Entitlement To The NG (National Government): €272,160
Collected: €68,000
To the Parishes: €30,100
To each parish (based on senate agreement) €2,150 (Includes Charlotte Parish)
Added to the NSA (National Savings Account) €300

Property Taxes
Total Population: 100,000
Total income of all individuals on PEI €26,000,000
Tax income: €2,600,000
To the National Government: €260,000
To each Parish: €167,000
Added to the NSA €20,000

Electricity Sales
€6,307,200
To NG: €6,300,000
To NSA: €7,200

Total addition to NSA: €27,500


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 10, 2011, 08:10:47 AM
The Bedford Assembly suggests to the Chancellor that in order to increase representation, that Lot 34 be split, with a new "suburb" be created.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 10, 2011, 08:47:35 AM
The Bedford Assembly suggests to the Chancellor that in order to increase representation, that Lot 34 be split, with a new "suburb" be created.

Chancellor, to the Bedford Assembly
I had considered that option, but I don't think it addresses the greater problem. I don't think that one assemblyman per 1,500 people is an adequate ratio, especially since only four of our lots and settlements have population in excess of that number. I think a fair apportionment would give one assemblyman per 400 people, and that one should round up if the remainder is greater than half of that 400. (So two assemblymen at 600 population, three at 1,000, and so on.) Even this would only double the size of the assembly, since the small lots and villages are so overrepresented that many of them would not gain another assemblyman from this proposal.

OOC: Is the splitting of a lot something that I could do unilaterally, or would it require approval from the National Government? If it's the former, then that power could be abused to a great degree.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 10, 2011, 09:08:18 AM
OOC - The Senate would need to approve it. As well, there is very little public appetite for this sort of change, many people feel the national government is "big enough as it is"


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on May 10, 2011, 01:26:25 PM
Just letting you all know I'm still alive.  Oh, and I'm Catholic....because well, I am.:P


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 10, 2011, 03:09:30 PM
I have a proposal to put before the Senate.

Quote
Several Lots have populations in excess of one thousand people. This poses several problems:

1.) High-population Lots are underrepresented in the Assembly.
2.) The high populations of these Lots impose a heavier burden on the Assemblymen representing them, as they have more constituents to serve.
3.) Local issues are more difficult to address within a high-population Lot.

To address these problems, the Chancellor of Bedford Parish proposes that all Lots with population in excess of one thousand people be split into two Lots of roughly equal population. The Lots that would be affected by this legislation are Lots 1, 2, 19, 24, 31, 34, 35, 48, and 65. The Chancellor also proposes that special elections be held as soon as practicable so that the new Lots may receive representation in the Assembly.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Bacon King on May 10, 2011, 05:45:49 PM
(OOC)

I'll take St. George's. I'll be Duke Bacon: Scottish, United Protestant (one of the Presbyterians therein, if it matters) and a resident of Montague.

Questions: What do the colors mean on the religion map? And how exactly is the Catholic Church's hierarchy set up, considering we have no contact with Rome?


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 10, 2011, 06:32:17 PM
(OOC)

I'll take St. George's. I'll be Duke Bacon: Scottish, United Protestant (one of the Presbyterians therein, if it matters) and a resident of Montague.

Questions: What do the colors mean on the religion map? And how exactly is the Catholic Church's hierarchy set up, considering we have no contact with Rome?

Each Parish has a bishop. There is as of yet no head-bishop for the island, though one has been proposed.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 11, 2011, 01:21:00 AM
No one else is playing. I is sad. :(


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 11, 2011, 01:45:17 PM
Your Majesty, I move for a quorum call.

OOC Translation: Bump!


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 11, 2011, 09:38:12 PM
I have a proposal to put before the Senate.

Quote
Several Lots have populations in excess of one thousand people. This poses several problems:

1.) High-population Lots are underrepresented in the Assembly.
2.) The high populations of these Lots impose a heavier burden on the Assemblymen representing them, as they have more constituents to serve.
3.) Local issues are more difficult to address within a high-population Lot.

To address these problems, the Chancellor of Bedford Parish proposes that all Lots with population in excess of one thousand people be split into two Lots of roughly equal population. The Lots that would be affected by this legislation are Lots 1, 2, 19, 24, 31, 34, 35, 48, and 65. The Chancellor also proposes that special elections be held as soon as practicable so that the new Lots may receive representation in the Assembly.

Some debate (which I'll dispense with) shows that many in the Senate do not like this idea, especially those in parishes that will not see any benefit from this, or those who feel that this would put too many people into an already (literally) overcrowded assembly (room)


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Bacon King on May 12, 2011, 12:02:26 AM
Indeed, my fellow Senators, I see no reason to divide existing lots.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 12, 2011, 01:35:58 AM
Noble Duke, I notice that the town of Montague is underrepresented as well. Perhaps this amended version of the legislation will meet with your satisfaction?

Quote
Several Lots and Towns have excessive populations. This poses several problems:

1.) High-population Lots are underrepresented in the Assembly.
2.) The high populations of these Lots impose a heavier burden on the Assemblymen representing them, as they have more constituents to serve.
3.) Local issues are more difficult to address within a high-population Lot.

To address these problems, the Chancellor of Bedford Parish proposes that all Lots with population in excess of nine hundred and fifty people be split into two Lots of roughly equal population. The Lots that would be affected by this legislation are Lots 1, 2, 4, 5, 19, 24, 29, 31, 34, 35, 48, and 65. The Chancellor also proposes that an additional assemblyman be apportioned to each of the towns of Cavendish, Kensington, Miltonvale Park, Montague, and Souris, and to the city of Charlottetown. Finally, the Chancellor proposes that special elections be held as soon as is practicable so that the new Lots and affected towns may receive their due representation in the Assembly.

As to the legitimate concerns as to the overcrowding of our Assembly Hall, I think it fitting that proper facilities be constructed.

OOC: This benefits 10 of the 14 parishes.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 12, 2011, 01:52:24 AM
Senators are still not convinced. Some are proposing fixing this by disenfranchising certain lots, others suggest that lots could be combined and get a single representative. Bedford's own assemblymen (while supporting the official stance of the parish) are beginning to express concerns as their chats with their own citizens (even those in the "under-represented" lots) are showing that this idea is unpopular at this time.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 12, 2011, 02:13:39 AM
OOC: I can see this is a losing battle, but I'll still have one more trick up my sleeve. I fear this one will be as futile as the others, however.

IC: Very well, gentlemen, I shall withdraw my previous piece of legislation. However, since it is taking so incredibly long for the Senate Staff to give us the report on the costs for the energy proposal, I have had enough time to draft yet another proposal.

Quote
The current system of apportioning Assemblymen to Lots and Settlements results in gross under representation for more populated areas. To correct this problem, The Chancellor proposes that, effective the next general election, Assemblymen be apportioned to each parish by its population, in accordance with the most recent census figures. The apportionment shall be as follows:

21 Assemblymen for Charlotte Parish
16 for Richmond Parish
13 for Bedford Parish
11 for Hillsborough Parish
10 for Grenville Parish
9 for North Parish
8 for St. David Parish
7 for St. George Parish
7 for Egmont Parish
6 for Halifax Parish
5 for St. Andrew Parish
5 for East Parish
4 for St. John Parish, and
4 for St. Patrick Parish.

Each Parish shall retain the responsibility for how these Assemblymen shall be apportioned within the Parish.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 12, 2011, 02:21:03 AM
Senators proposed this proposal be put away for a little while and returned to.

Senate staff respond they are still compiling the budget and that info on the cost of a national electricity grid will come after this. Other Senators wish to begin discussion on if such a grid is needed, desired, and/or how it would be implemented.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 12, 2011, 02:27:09 AM
2nd Senator for Richmond proposes a nationwide poll be taken to gauge the issues most important to the public.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 12, 2011, 02:30:46 AM
I believe that there are definite benefits to having a national electricity grid, but those benefits must be weighed against the costs. The potential costs in monetary value, magic room requests, and sheer space could outweigh any benefits such a grid would provide. I am officially undecided on this issue until the senate staff give their report.

I also second the proposal by the Senator from Richmond.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 12, 2011, 02:36:04 AM
CoS (Chief of Staff) for the Department of Electricity:

The wires and polls would be run along the rail grid and roads. Not a single tree would have to be chopped down, or, a single square metre of farmland occupied, in order to fit in the transmission lines. Generating stations would either need to be placed in towns, or, would require the chopping down of perhaps a dozen trees each.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 12, 2011, 02:40:46 AM
That sounds good so far. Any word on the other costs?


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 12, 2011, 02:43:24 AM
The 2nd Senator from Egmont presents the following: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fykeQNVadYk which he has built. He suggests that wood powered steam generators can be central in the new grid.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 12, 2011, 02:53:20 AM
That looks promising, Senator. It is bound to reduce the some of the other costs as well, since it runs on wood. How many of those generators would be needed, and what would they cost us in terms of materials?


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 12, 2011, 02:59:00 AM
BREAKING NEWS

Reports are coming in from North Parish, that the Prince County "Magic Room" has disappeared, and "drag marks" have been spotted heading towards the southern shore of Prince Royalty.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 12, 2011, 03:01:23 AM
Speaker - Senators, we have an urgent issue

BREAKING NEWS

Reports are coming in from North Parish, that the Prince County "Magic Room" has disappeared, and "drag marks" have been spotted heading towards the southern shore of Prince Royalty.

Currently present are 2 senators from each Parish, except, only 1 from each St. Andrew and St. John, and NO senators from either Richmond or Egmont.

Communiqués to both parishes have not been responded to. All assemblymembers from both parishes are also home.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 12, 2011, 03:06:35 AM
CoS for the department of national security has provided a map of two possible routes that magic room has taken:

()

CoS for the department for the magic rooms has suggested the Senate quickly vote to "turn off" said box, as we no longer know who has it, and North Parish is due to make use of it next.

Senators for North Parish are enraged.



Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 12, 2011, 03:09:51 AM
Statement from the Chancellor
"The disappearance of the Prince County Magic Room is a serious problem. The national government should do everything in its power to investigate this matter and, if possible, return the room to its rightful location. In the meantime, I suggest that requests by Prince County Parishes be directed to the national government, which should forward those requests to the National Magic Room."


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 12, 2011, 03:18:38 AM
I propose the following:

1.) The Prince County Magic Room shall be turned off immediately.
2.) Military personnel for the national government shall be immediately assigned to guard the magic boxes for Kings and Queens Counties, as well as the one for the national government.
3.) The Department of National Security shall continue their investigation of the disappearance of the Magic Room, focusing their initial efforts on the areas around Tyne Valley and Sherbrooke.
4.) That any requests made by Prince County Parishes shall be directed to the national government, which will forward those requests to the National Magic Room.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 12, 2011, 03:32:27 AM
Senators generally agree with this and have put it up for a vote.

(I'll give 24 hours for other players to vote on this crisis! Note that in game-time only a few minutes, perhaps an hour, has passed since the news was received)


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 13, 2011, 10:05:28 AM
Vote passes.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 13, 2011, 12:43:29 PM

It would be nice if some of the other players were active...


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 13, 2011, 12:47:35 PM
The entire parliamentary delegation for both Egmont and Richmond are approaching the capitol via Train. A message sent ahead of them says they wish to address the Senate.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 13, 2011, 12:59:46 PM
The 1st Senator (leader) of Richmond Parish brings news.

He has taken the magic room (to which he calls "the box")

Quote
I've taken the Box. I've ordered it moved, after consultation with my friend in Egmont.
Currently, the Box is in Summerside, near the harbour. It is awaiting use by it's next rightful user, North Parish. Formerly, this was the only Box to not be located on a rail line, access was by sea, and difficult due to the shallow harbour at Princetown. Now, the Box is located in a major habour and, along the rail line.

I plan to move the Box to Linkletter. This is an idea that my friend in Egmont has come up with. I have spoken to all residents of Princetown, and all of them have moved to be with the Box and continue to administer it. I have spoken to the residents of Linkletter and all of them have agreed to my plan. Egmont has agreed to my plans as well.

I will move the box to Linkletter as outlined on the map. I will annex Prince Royalty's main portion, while Egmont annexes it's island. These areas are currently uninhabited. They will be added to lots 16 and 18. Princetown and Prince Royalty will cease to exist.

In return, I will hand over the town of Linkletter to the national government. Linkletter will become the new Prince Royalty, and, the new Capitol of Prince County. Residents of Linkletter are aware of what this means, and I have their support. Linkletter's assemblyman will attest to this. The Box will be placed on the rail line at the major concentration of Linkletter's population, which is near the border with Summerside. The Box will be administered by the Feds, as is at current. The only change shall be it's location. Now that it is located on a rail line, access will be much easier for all Prince County parishes.

I hope that my fellow Senators will see the wisdom of this proposal, and will accept it.

()


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 13, 2011, 01:00:20 PM
The entire parliamentary delegation for both Egmont and Richmond are approaching the capitol via Train. A message sent ahead of them says they wish to address the Senate.

(OOC: I recommend that the Director of Halifax launch a full-scale invasion of Egmont immediately! And move on to Richmond afterwards. [/joke])

IC: I see no reason to deny the rightful officials of our government their right to address the Senate.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 13, 2011, 01:13:39 PM
Is it possible for the Senate to expel Senators for illegal activity?

Also, St. David Parish straddles the real-life border of Prince and Queens county. To which does it belong, particularly for the purpose of the magic boxes?


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 13, 2011, 01:18:53 PM
It's been known to collect from both from time to time, as deficits can be made up for by the national government. Technically, it collects from Queens.

And yes, the Senate can expel members.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 13, 2011, 01:35:07 PM
Firstly, I would remind the senators from Richmond and Egmont that taking such action without the consent of the national government is illegal, and you can be incarcerated should the national government wish to prosecute. You can also be expelled from the Senate.

Secondly, while the proposal seems sound to me, it is hardly my concern. As the issue affects all of Prince County's parishes, I will not support the proposal without the unanimous consent of all of Prince County's senators.

Thirdly, I move that a delegation representing North Parish be taken to the supposed new location of the box, under armed escort by the national military and North Parish militia. They will verify that the box is there. Upon doing so, we will turn on the Prince County box for a period of five minutes, whereupon North Parish will use the box, to determine if it is genuine.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 13, 2011, 02:00:12 PM
The delegation from North Parish has spoken to the delegation from Richmond. They have made arrangements to get their items from the box. North Parish has decided to support this new move.

St. John Parish however is incensed. They demand that the entire government of Egmont and Richmond be arrested, and the National Government take over both parishes.

The senate is having trouble keeping itself in order.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Bacon King on May 13, 2011, 02:01:11 PM
Firstly, I would remind the senators from Richmond and Egmont that taking such action without the consent of the national government is illegal, and you can be incarcerated should the national government wish to prosecute. You can also be expelled from the Senate.

Secondly, while the proposal seems sound to me, it is hardly my concern. As the issue affects all of Prince County's parishes, I will not support the proposal without the unanimous consent of all of Prince County's senators.

Thirdly, I move that a delegation representing North Parish be taken to the supposed new location of the box, under armed escort by the national military and North Parish militia. They will verify that the box is there. Upon doing so, we will turn on the Prince County box for a period of five minutes, whereupon North Parish will use the box, to determine if it is genuine.

I entirely echo the concerns of the esteemed Senator from Bedford.

I believe we should seriously consider the expulsion from the Senate of those who attempted to circumvent the authority of the National Government, especially if the senators from Richmond and Egmont held any malicious intent with their actions. At the very least, assuming the problem was only negligence and a lack of judgement, they should still at least be formally censured for their actions.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 13, 2011, 02:08:37 PM
The 1st Senator from Egmont has made a startling revelation.

Quote
The only reason I am here is that I caught him in the act
Referring to the 1st Senator from Richmond
Quote
His original plan was to take the box to Summerside and keep it there, to allow access, but to have it in his parish. His 2nd Senator and I were the ones who came up with the Linkletter idea

Richmond's 2nd senator would confirm this
Quote
It was his idea. We, the entire delegation, had to talk him out of it. What we ended up with was a compromise.

St. John parish demands the 1st Senator from Richmond be removed from the Senate, at minimum, if not arrested.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 13, 2011, 02:09:42 PM
Rumblings are that the Assembly delegation from Richmond has turned against it's leader. Rumour is that they plan to remove their dear leader from his position.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Bacon King on May 13, 2011, 02:14:38 PM
I call for the expulsion 1st Senator from Richmond, and also call for the establishment of an ad-hoc investigation committee (that would have power of arrest) in order to determine the scope of the wrongdoing and punishments for those responsible.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 13, 2011, 02:18:41 PM
I call for the expulsion 1st Senator from Richmond, and also call for the establishment of an ad-hoc investigation committee (that would have power of arrest) in order to determine the scope of the wrongdoing and punishments for those responsible.

I second the proposal by the Senator from St. George. This indicates a clear abuse of power by the Senator from Richmond.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 13, 2011, 02:21:19 PM
I urge the Assembymen from Richmond to keep cool heads. The Senate has already moved for the expulsion of the Leader of Richmond, and for further investigation into the matter.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 13, 2011, 02:34:19 PM
Senators from both Egmont and North parish are upset at the idea that the leader of Richmond could be arrested, citing that proposals to extend the rail line to the box in Prince County have been "ignored in the Senate for months prior to this"

The (Emperor) Speaker suggests that a legal committee could be formed, but that there does exist a Supreme Court which could also look at the case.

He also points out that technically no law has been broken, as all laws referring to the Boxes only refer to someone preventing others from using it, which now that the Box is in use again, is no longer required.

Senators from North Paris meanwhile wait for the box to be re-activated.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 13, 2011, 02:40:51 PM
BREAKING NEWS

The leader of Richmond Parish has resigned from his position and his Senate Seat.

(OOC - this ends the "crisis". Now is the "aftermath" where I'll say much less and you guys will - hopefully - say much more)


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 13, 2011, 02:43:00 PM
Oh, btw, this means Richmond is now playable.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 13, 2011, 02:54:22 PM
The speaker has boiled down the recent events to a series of motions.

Proposal 1001 - That the current de-facto arrangement and proposal, of moving Prince Royalty to Linkletter and dissolving the old Prince Royalty, be made official in law. (This would include turning the box back on, and undo the previous vote etc.)

Proposal 1002 - To charge the former leader of Richmond Parish with Treason.

The speaker opens the floor for debate on either of these.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Bacon King on May 13, 2011, 03:24:31 PM
Ooc- what is the punishment for treason?


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 13, 2011, 03:29:37 PM
There is no punishment on the books.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 13, 2011, 05:40:02 PM
The speaker has boiled down the recent events to a series of motions.

Proposal 1001 - That the current de-facto arrangement and proposal, of moving Prince Royalty to Linkletter and dissolving the old Prince Royalty, be made official in law. (This would include turning the box back on, and undo the previous vote etc.)

Proposal 1002 - To charge the former leader of Richmond Parish with Treason.

The speaker opens the floor for debate on either of these.


It is clear that Senators from Richmond, Egmont, and North Parishes are in favor of moving Prince Royalty to Linkletter. I will withhold my vote on this matter until the Senators from Halifax give their opinions.

As for the second proposal, while I most strongly disapprove of the actions taken by the former leader of Richmond Parish, I do not think they equate to treason. I move to downgrade the charge to theft  of government property.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 14, 2011, 12:07:31 AM
OOC - Halifax is a played parish. His Senators are under his control. His assemblymen however can be spoken to, and, they generally support this move, but will wait for further instruction from their leader.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 14, 2011, 06:54:53 PM
Speaker - A call for a vote on proposal 1001, to move the capital of Prince County to Linkletter.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 14, 2011, 07:16:55 PM
Speaker - A call for a vote on proposal 1001, to move the capital of Prince County to Linkletter.

Abstain.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Bacon King on May 15, 2011, 05:58:53 PM
Abstain. Should be a matter for Prince County to decide.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 15, 2011, 06:59:59 PM
RESULTS

yes votes: 11 (North, Egmont, Richmond, St. David, Hillsborough, East)
no votes: 2 (St. John)
abstentions: 10 (remainder)

Motion passes. Map will be updated shortly.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on May 15, 2011, 09:35:45 PM
I agree with the Chancellor that this is a matter for Prince Country to decide.  However, since the motion has been passed I think at this point it is best to decide what to do with the Senators from Richmond.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 15, 2011, 09:58:22 PM
()

Census data has been updated as well.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 15, 2011, 11:16:55 PM
I believe the former First Senator from Richmond should be charged with theft of government property. By all accounts, the First Senator acted completely on his own initiative and without the knowledge or consent of the Second Senator, or the Senators from Egmont. They only became involved after the fact. I move that no charges be pressed against them.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on May 16, 2011, 08:44:44 AM
I believe the former First Senator from Richmond should be charged with theft of government property. By all accounts, the First Senator acted completely on his own initiative and without the knowledge or consent of the Second Senator, or the Senators from Egmont. They only became involved after the fact. I move that no charges be pressed against them.

I second this motion.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 16, 2011, 08:49:39 AM
Senators are generally in favour of this.

The minister of justice can arrest the suspect himself, he is looking to the Senate for guidance.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 16, 2011, 01:21:38 PM
Shall we bring it to a vote, then?


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 16, 2011, 01:29:17 PM
Aye



Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 16, 2011, 03:48:10 PM
Over the next month, officials of Bedford Parish, on the Chancellor's orders, will be conducting surveys in the Parish to determine issues of concern to Bedford's residents. The schedule for the surveys is as follows:

Week 1: Stratford
Week 2: Lots 48 and 49
Week 3: Lots 35, 36, 37, and Mount Stewart
Week 4: Lot 34 and Union Road


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on May 16, 2011, 08:48:22 PM
Aye.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Main Thread.
Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on May 16, 2011, 08:51:10 PM
Over the next month, officials of Bedford Parish, on the Chancellor's orders, will be conducting surveys in the Parish to determine issues of concern to Bedford's residents. The schedule for the surveys is as follows:

Week 1: Stratford
Week 2: Lots 48 and 49
Week 3: Lots 35, 36, 37, and Mount Stewart
Week 4: Lot 34 and Union Road

I would like to conduct a survey on the same system, with the following schedule:

Week 1:  O'Leary, Lot 5 and 6
Week 2:  Lots 7, 8 and 9
Week 3:  Lots 10, 11 and 12


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 16, 2011, 09:22:21 PM
Aye.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Bacon King on May 16, 2011, 09:25:41 PM
Aye.


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on May 16, 2011, 09:31:39 PM
Motion passes


Title: Re: PEI Game - Senate
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on May 18, 2011, 07:56:22 PM
Now that the crisis has been resolved, I propose that we go back to the energy issue. Does anyone else have anything to suggest on that matter?