Talk Elections

Mine moved almost five points to the left socially from the last time that I took the PM test.

Left economically, center-left socially. Mainstream Democrat.

Actually, most mainstream Democrats aren't pro-life, like I am. I see how you could have gotten that impression though. ;)

As for yours, it would be better if your social and economic scores were flipped around. Still, independent is probably an appropriate label for you.

A democrat that jump on the social moderate liberal from his social moderate conservative score.

looks good to me.

I'm okay with this.

Somewhat acceptable though I'd say a bit right wing for my tastes both ways.

It could use a higher social score.

Economic needs to be 10 points lower, social needs to be 5 points lower.

Eminently acceptable.

Seems to about right from his posts so far. I would have guess the social score to be a little lower but I'm not terribly suprised considering I find him to be one of the more likeable liberals on this forum. I'd prefer both scores to be about 10 points higher if I wanted agreement for voting purposes and such.

Not great, but it's not terribly accurate either. I would probably subtract about 2-3 points from each score TBH, or change the test questions substantially.

Multiply each score by negative one and I'm sold.

[@ TJ: Drugs and very conflicted feelings about abortion. The social score would probably be considerably lower if not for those two issues.]

Could work in West Virginia.

Fits him well.  Doesn't fit North Carolina, but then I'm pretty sure he's from Pennsylvania.

I just took the PM test again without critical checks and got:

E+2.97  S+5.57

As you can see it makes a pretty decent difference to the S+7.30 that Mint seems to think is too high. I guess I feel more strongly about the same set of issues I am the most conservative on. I also think the economic change is more about whether I clicked "Agree" or "Usually Agree" or some minor differences that will happen every time I take the test.

SKIP

Yelnoc should be up next.

SoCons scare me

I already regret posting in this thread, but I largely find it unoffensive. When thinking of what kinds of answers are necessary to reach such a score, I feel like it's realistic...if even a bit shy or tamed.

Looks good but could be more liberal both ways.

I'm actually surprised the economic score is so far to the right. I'm also not so far left socially (except on those special select LGBT issues that I will not give in on) but that is because of my upbringing and I find the sort of passion that often comes with social scores very far to the left sort of inspiring.

Seems waaaaaay too far left economicly.

Definitely fits our more moderate/sane libertarian member.

good

Good. Certainly very far to the left socially, but again, I'm okay with that.

Would be closer to mine if his economic and social scores swapped but his views seem more than acceptable.

Singing from the same hymnsheet.

Social far-left and economic center-right. One of the more interesting scores around here.

EDIT: This post was meant for Napoleon, but it's more than applicable to afleitch as well.

I am, just on vacation.

SKIP

Assemblyman MOPolitico: Could be a liberal Republican, but independent seems accurate.

A real but moderate conservative.
I almost envy his PM score ;D.

Very surprising that according to the PM he's to the left of me on economics. :P 

Very much a 21st C. European centrist ... which tends to mean left of centre socially, and slightly right of centre economically..

Could be more liberal but not bad by any measure.

A politician I'd vote for, but could use a shift to the economic left a little bit.

Pretty standard US hardcore liberal - but shows a lot of reason too

Switching the scores could help a little bit, but more than acceptable as-is.

Colbertiste trend of all Frenchies, probably :P

For Nathan, well, I don't know him well, so I guess it's pretty accurate, though a bit disappointing for my taste.

Too conservative IMO :P

Going by that score, he belongs in the Libertarian Party.

Somewhat odd score considering that most left-economic, right-social types seem to be just a little further left on both.

Tiny too leftist on ecomincs and not enough social libertarianism for me.

Fine.

I see the score went a little to the left of were it was last week. I'd have guessed based on his strong self-identification as a lefty it'd be even further, but the score seems a decent match for his views as far as I can tell. No surprise the social score is what it is.

Fine moderate libertarian. The sort that doesn't give me the willies and bad dreams about J.H. Blair.

Given the economic score I'd expect a Democrat to be more "left" socially, but I guess that's explained by your identification as a traditionalist-leaning lefty in your sig.

Standard American Democrat (SAD, in a good way :))

I have to wonder what Irish party he's a member of.

Econ isn't bad.. social score is much too high.  Is it because of one issue (abortion perhaps?) or because you're a social conservative?

I wouldn't call myself socially conservative.  I don't reject change automatically at all, but I am a bit more authoritarian than the mainstream.  It was probably my abortion answer that drove up, though I did not prioritize the issue.  Basically, I don't believe the lowest common denominator man (or woman) is competent enough to behave in a way that doesn't harm society in someway, and thus needs a few nudges from the state in the right direction.  Like seat belt laws, taxes on fatty foods and drugs, etc.

Surprising. You must be a conservative. ;)

Flip the scores, then drag both a bit further left, and we're golden.

Pull him a little down on social issues, and we're good.

Seems to match him quite well.  If anything, he could go more negative on social I think.

Social score could be lower.

Too socially "librul" of course !
I'm astonished his economic score isn't more negative.

Too right-wing for my tastes.

I am more than okay with this.

The social score looks okay, economic not so much.

Normal-ish fiscon (judging solely by the PM score, I wouldn't say this is more generally valid). Eh.

Econ score is the same as mine, though the test obviously looks for certain things and not others; still I expect we agree pretty closely. My social score has come down over the years, but not likely to go below -4. Overall close to my political orientation so I approve. ; )

Fine.

Seems like a fairly standard liberal. I probably wouldn't agree with him on much but I'm not aware of anything unusual or "wrong" with his PM score.

This score makes me scared

Nothing wrong.

Fits him well and not too extreme.

A little more left on the econ score would be nice, but otherwise fine.

Nothing wrong.

Bumping--this was cool.

Social score is not to my liking.

Seems about right. Basically if Napoleon finally admitted to being a right-winger.

He's a libby lib, but not an extreme one. Pretty common around here.

Mirrors mine, so obviously a FF.

Pretty centrist.

Far too conservative.



I'm pretty sure that guy is a liberal too.

Make it more negative :P

Maybe a little extreme, but probably has to do with what he marked as critical (I didn't mark much)

Great, however I would have the social score 30 points higher or so.

Unbelieving far-left. Frankly I do not even know who to begin to understand where he is coming from. 

Generic far-right.

A little left economically, possibly, for my liking, but not bad.

Score should be more leftist IMO.

Good economic score, too socially liberal

Expected you to be a little less of a socon.

Too left wing for me :P

The economic score could use a decent drop. :)

Fine.

Great

Better than mine :P

All right.

Wish the economic score was negative. Overall, fine.

A lot more 'left' than me, but it's a score that seems to reflect ...him? and he? seems like a nice and reasonable person.

Could be more socially liberal

Could be more liberal on pocket book issues.

Social should be five points higher.

Don't post in a g 'Opinion of the previous poster's PM score' if you don't have a PM score.

Acceptable. ;) Though I'm surprised your economic PM isn't a couple points lower.

Thumbs up  :)

Probably an issue of what you marked as critical and I didn't.

Too much of an anarcho-socialist for my tastes :)

I liked the old one better but still not horrible.

Holy social score, Batman!

How are you a Republican with that score?

(Mine was -7; -0,5 when I tested it a while back.)

I just retested myself.  My politics have changed pretty much across the board over the last few months.  Considering the fact that I've abandoned much of the views I inherited from my parents.  But, you're right.  I think I've made it clear here for quite a while that I don't really find either party very attractive.

*Skip 

I didn't imagine you were to the centre on social issues.

Great though a bit more social liberal/libertarian would help

I don't think the real RFK would have a score quite that left-wing :P

Hello, Jon Huntsman.

Perfect

Far too fiscally liberal for my liking.

Fratboy.

I assume you're not actually a Republican.

Generic liberal. I'm not a huge fan of it and would have hoped for slightly better (ie. ~S: -2 or -3) considering Snowstalker has said before he wants the Democrats to focus on a working class coalition.

Too far to the right economically; even his social score is too conservative for my liking.

...lol

Even out the scores a tad.

@TJ: I'm probably less socially liberal than the test implies. Though I answered the more socially liberal answers on most of those issues, I really don't care that much about prostitution or euthanasia compared to labor rights or health care reform.

Should be more social liberal.

Generic Center-left Liberal.

'could be the furthest-left score I've ever seen on here.

Classic Dixiecrat.

Socialist.

Northeast liberal

Paulite/Buchananite.

RINO.

Northeastern liberal

Not bad at all.

Molotov chucking types make me sad inside :(

Too positive on both social and economic score.

Multiply both by negative 1 and I'd be happy. It's hard to judge the test's accuracy for RFK without a more detailed understanding of his positions.

TJ's PM score is even more perfect than mine. :P

Decent.

Fine.

Economic score is to negative for me.

No big complaints.  Good and moderate.

Typical Connecticut liberal :P

Even better then me on social issues.

Terrible

Quite fine :P ;)

Bad

Gene Clark - Teenage Fanclub

Libertarian :P

-ducks for cover-

You'll learn how the real world works soon enough.

Why would you wish that on anyone?

Paleo-consercative turned libertarian

Standard liberal left-winger, probably unhappy with Obama for compromising, etc, but will vote for him because the Republican field is unacceptable.

Fairly left-leaning centrist.

I approve of Miles's score; though he's more socially conservative overall than I am, you'd never really know.

Either he doesn't know the difference between a plus and a minus sign, or he is legitimately fascist.

According to the political matrix graphic (https://uselectionatlas.org/TOOLS/POLMTX/images/graph.jpg) I'm spiritually akin to Oswald Mosley. :-*

One minus and one plus is decent.
Two signs of the same kind, like in Nathan's political coordinates, are dangerous.

Worst post on PM scores ever?

Please don't post in this thread when you don't have a political score, ça ira.

I kind of like the social score though I may not so much like the logic behind it. Not a huge fan of the economic one but to me that's of secondary importance.

Are you not noticing George Wallace? Or for that matter Adolf Hitler?

You and FDR are kindred souls. Congratulations! :D

PS: You forgot to evaluate TJ's score.

Yikes.

You should look at my score, not at Merkel's breasts. :P

Your score is quite fine, though you ought to watch out for not making leeway into the libertarian quadrant.

TJ: About ten points too far to the right for me on both scales, but this shouldn't be construed as me disliking or having a problem with him.

Atheist2006: I've made my opinion pretty clear already.

You don't see a Democrat with an economic score that's noticeably more left-wing than their social score very often. I guess that's the 'traditionalist' part.

Fine by me. :P

Boring? I'm one of about five posters in the same quadrant as you. Please, boring on this forum is -E,-S or +E,-S.

This is true, your PM score's a rare one indeed.

White kid in who lives in a nice townhouse in Baltimore

Centrist left winger

Weird, to say least.

Actually somewhat less left-wing than I would have predicted from his posts. Probably fairly par-for-the-course for a European socialist, though. :)

Center-right.

Very left-wing for a Texan.

I'm not Texan, actually.

Also, hyper-authoritarian, much?

My buddy score

I probably hit the "critical" button less often than some other people, but I admit I was myself surprised I don't have 1 or 2 less points on economics.

SKIP

fascist lol

cohesion - minutemen awful

Liberta-*shot*

Getting less progressive

L.I.N.O.

Fitting for a Nazi, isn't it?

Disapprove.

lolwut

Standard forum Dem.

Center left

Close enough.

I don't approve of your economic score :P

I did not quite have you down as an anarcho-capitalist.

Left-leaning centrist.

Standard American liberal.

Awful.

Ehh.

Alright with my standards

Reverse both scores, and I shall be happy.

Too conservative

Not terrible economically, but way too liberal on social issues.

I approve.

That social score scares the crap out of me.

The best he's ever had. :P

Fits him well :)

Moderate hero.

Pretty good :D

Certainly by far the most reasonable Winston has ever been!

Reasonable fellow.

If he'd only flip the social and economic, it'd be golden.

What Ben said.


:P

Drag down the economics score and we're good.

Raise the economic score a tad bit and we're good.

A economic score around -4.00 would be helpful

Very good :D

I approve

Sidenote: Are you not supposed to hit the 'This is a critical issue to me.' box or something? I see very few people with +/- 8 for social or econ. I interpreted critical as strongly supportive or strongly opposed so I ended up checking the box for most all the issues though there were a few I just couldn't feel critical or strongly for/against so I went with neutral (such as the government funding museums/theaters if they couldn't financially survive on their own through fares and fees. I was like "meh... depends on the institution" and went with neutral)

edit: wording

I used to use them. Since I've returned to Atlas, I've declared a moratorium on em.

Your score rules btw

"Critical" tends to mean the issues most important to you. Your best bet is to check 3-4 issues as critical.

Pretty much what you'd expect for a rather left-wing Democrat. A little too negative economically for my liking, but it's fine.

Solid, could be more socially liberal I suppose. :P

Right-wing. :P

Approve very much.

Splendid.

Approve the score

I like the econ score; social score, not so much.

Social score would be much better if reversed :)

Economic score should be lower (and based on your PF 2012 positions, it probably is)

Decent

Obviously the problem with all these threads is you get the same people commenting on each others' PM scores over and over again. :P

Napoleon has a... Freedom Score?

A high Economic score would be nice...:D

I have a feeling that I have commented on you before.  But still, it bothers me.  You seem like too nice of a guy to be a Randite.

Moderate hero to the rescue!

What's that supposed to mean? :P :P :P

-skip-

Have you read that book? -_-

_skip_

Atlas Shrugged? 3 times! :D

Dear God, really? My condolences. :(

Not a huge fan of the PM score, but about what I'd expect for a fairly staunch libertarian.

Rather perfect.

Make the economic score a little more like the social score, and we're golden.

Pretty awesome, if more moderate within the stream of left-liberalism on both axes than I.

Eh...way to liberal for my tastes :P

I don't think Klecly is as much of a neocon as he thinks he is.  Give it a few years ;)

The moderate hero-est of moderate heroes.

A bit too much to the left, but not unreasonable

Remarkably well-centered!

Loving the social score; raise the economic score just a tiny bit.

Your econ score could be raised a few points :P

Pretty normal for a libertarian. Though I think he will move more towards the center as he gets older, no offense.

I liked the previous iteration of his score marginally better, but I still approve.

The economic score is fine by me, but I'll admit the social score scares me a bit. :P

Drop both a teeny bit

Economic score is fine.  I have to wonder how many boxes one has to check as a "critical issues" to get a score over +/-5, though.  I just retook the PM test and my score moved slightly closer to the center economically while flip-flopping socially.  I don't see how people get so far from the center (not that I think the PM test is particularly accurate).

Raise your economic score :P

You has less liberal social score plz?

E way to high...S only slightly high.

And that signature knocks your standing down a few points in my book ;)

Oh, good ol' Southern Blue Dog...

Seems about right for Texas although it would be nice to see that Social score move down a few points :)

Good social score, bad economic score.

Good score. Almost certainly stands with the working class, if you look at his signature. I am guessing the reason his Economic score isn't lower don't really matter.

Excellent

Pretty good.

Too liberal socially.

Downright scary.

Reverse the E score and it's just fine :)

()

Oh my! The odd thing is that the chap seems reasonably sane to me. How is this possible?  :P

I-CA

Economic score is basically fine, but the social score's a tad low. How's the hedonistic -8 lifestyle?

"-8"? Anyway, I just adore my life these days. I really do. Every day is a new adventure. 

I was actually posting after Scott. ;)

The -8 thing is a reference to a classic Politico post in which he expressed his horror at what kind of decadent, dionysian life someone with a social score of -8 would lead.

It's not that I endorse hedonistic lifestyles, I just don't want the government telling someone that they can't. ;) (skip)

Oakvale: Socially pretty good, perhaps a bit moderate-heroish economically.

His social core is, for a leftist, unusually high, which I think is positive. Most leftists on this forum tend to be very liberal both socially and economically.

You need a negative social score :P

Insane, insane, insane. As Torie said, it's weird that he seems so (generally) reasonable given such an extreme score on both axes. :P

Decent social score - even though I'm sure he picked the wrong issues to get there. :P

Meh.

Solid

Reverse the social and it'll be fine :)

I don't like his scores, but with Ron Paul in his signature something has to give, hopefully the economic score will be affected too.

Econ +7.74 plz? :)

Social +9.91 plz?

NEVER >:O

:P

-skip me-

Not Skipping, I've already rated Pingvin. Multiply the Econ score by -1 please.

I'm curious where he would place on a more international test.  Seatown is certainly an American Liberal, but the PM score would lead me to believe he is a strand of socialist, which I haven't picked up in any of his posts.

Eminently reasonable! Approve!

E score is higher than his posts would indicate, but the score in itself is pretty decent :)

Whoa, there! You might want to tone down the libertarianism*, son.

Also, I've noticed that there's a [Inks]load of you E-Positive/S-Negatives out there. You guys could make Ronnie a force to be reckoned with eventually.


*My spell check says that that isn't a word: thoughts?

Skipping RP this time, next poster can choose to skip me if they want to.
Oakvale should retake the test, I think his score would be a lot more negative, especially in E department.
Here's your answer.
edit: Above poster's score is a freedom score.

Bump
Bad, but not that bad as it may be.

obviously inflated.

I wouldn't read too much into it if I were you.

You're not really someone who fits on the PM scale.

Freedom score, but his rhetoric seems more left-wing then his economic PM.

That E score needs to come up :(

Not exactly my cup of tea, but palatable.

Me gusta.

No me gusta your economic score :(

Rather good, but I don't see how it fits the Libertarian Party.

Excellent! :)

I vote Democrat when there's no decent Libertarians on the ballot (for President I'll probably vote for Gary Johnson, I'll vote Dem for Senate, maybe Libertarian for House, and Democrat in State House/Senate); I'm really only in the party because I don't want to be affiliated with Obama.

And quite good for Napoleon's scores.

Good :) The econ score can come up a little, but overall me gusta :)

The social score is very good, the economic score a bit too high for my likings.

Seems to me a lot more left than his score would indicate.

And you're a Romney supporter?

Eeyup! :P

As for you, the social score needs to be negative :P

()

20RP12 Y U NO SOCIALIST?

Meh, I guess it's kind of accurate.

Flip them and it would be very good!

Flip the economic and social scores :D

+ 7.30 soical and it will be fine.

The social score is a tad too high for my liking. Economic, however, is very nice indeed.

Bring em both down a tad.

E score could be lower, but it isn't horrible.

Decent. Your E score could stand to lower itself a bit, but I'm not complaining.

Flip that economic score plz :)

i don't believe it

Fine.

It sets off my internalized RWA alarm, but in fairness seems to suggest to me you are able to bring an interesting, albeit very underrepresented set of perspectives to the table in discussions here. :]

I can't find a PM score. :)

Fair enough :P

Subtract 10 from that E score and you're golden!

Just about right.

It's in his signature.

Bueno.

Agreeable enough to consider Snowstalker one of "us," not "them," so far as PM scores go. xD

I like it :)

No me gusta :(

Bad E, good S.

Too generic social democratic for me...but seems reasonable.

Great!

Good, but could need more economic socialism.

Ugh.

Perhaps lower the E score and flip the S score :P

not buying it

No me gusta your social score :(

Decent, for a libertarian.

Not bad and I'm always intrigued by posters with lower Econ than Social scores, however small the difference. :P

should try to be more 'interesting' then, i guess

:)


*-1 plz.

I like it.


That happens to me depending on my mood when taking the test.

Dat E :(

Too large for a signature.

Moderate the social and you'd almost be me

My score

Econ: 5.81
Social: 0.87

Surprisingly more moderate socially than I would've guessed. It's great!

Bad economic score.

Why are there so many E-moderate S-extremists? Y'all could do with a bit more leftism.

You're cool, though.

Could be more moderate but that is rare for youngs.

Besides marriage and abortion I'm much more moderate than many on this site think socially.  I'm still want further information regarding the drug issue (weed that is) i oppose the TSA's intrusion on our 4th Amendment rights, I oppose increasing presidential powers, I oppose CISPA and other online acts of censorship though I support a Christian's right to filter for their own moral and spiritual protection.

Napoleon: Perfect!


I'm a civil libertarian.

Fairly decent, all things considered.

We not very close...


(my score is in my sig)

Not good, though somewhat more moderate socially than I expected.

And folks think I'm a radical right winger. Maybe I could learn more from you to get my Econ score further right yet keep my social score right where it is.

Y u no +E score :(

Could stand for both to drop down a point or two, but decent.

Excellent.

so "moderate"!

An average Whig Party score. Positive! ;)

Wrong on everything.

Predictable on everything. ;)

a + would see again

You still have a .74 difference!  Haven't gamed them enough. :P

Effectively fascist due to the tyranny of the unrestricted free market.

this is the stupidest thing you have ever typed

Economic is okay. Social at face value is slightly too high for my liking.

Dreadful.

Almost perfect.

Bring the E up about 4 points and the S down about 5 points and you'd be perfect.

A seed of libertarianism.
A European guy like me doesn't understand what it means... :P
Or does understand it too well ;)

Eh, good social score.

:(

Fits his political views, but rather unrealistic and naive even in practice. ;)

Not bad. I'm surprised by your econ score, really.

Near perfect.

More conservative economically then I'd like, but pretty good on the whole.

Flip that E score and we'd have nearly the exact same score :P

I see you're moderating. It will be identical to my score any day now.

Could be worse, and it fits him relatively well.

Within the range of those who should be ruling the US. :)

Moderate hero! :D

Reasonable E score, the S score is a tad high though.

Yucky E score.

It is slightly moderate for my tastes but satisfactorily agreeable nonetheless.

E is bad :(

Decent.

Would be nice to see the economic score move north by about 12 or more points :P

Should moderate on economics. ;)

Btw I didn't know you were only 19.

As far as being a Connecticut Democrat goes, it's a great score :D

Have you been getting more moderate recently?

Why yes I have thank you for noticing :)

-skip-

Not that bad, although the PM score masks his transformation from excitable Paultard into party-line, cookie cutter Republican. :(

:(

Your score is great, though it's not exactly reflective of your views at times ;)

By Paultard standards, it ain't bad. By the time he's my age he'll probably be a European liberal rather than a libertarian.

Bumping.

Too liberal for my tastes on social issues, but good econ.

Move like 10 points to the left socially and he's about perfect. ;)

edit: Just realized I'm a teenage girl (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=171249.msg3673194#msg3673194)

Move a little to the right socially and its perfect ;)

Based on what I've seen of him in Atlasia, that score is bit misleading.

That's probably the lowest social score in all of Oklahoma. :P

Pretty classic libertarian-leaning Republican living in the West coast:  conservative on economic issues but a "live and let live" attitude on social issues.

Acceptable E, needs to move a bit left on social though.

I assume you mean social, right?

Love the economics score, but a bit too liberal on social issues IMO.

pretty good with me

Fits him well...and not as objectionable as it could be, certainly, for a Republican from Arkansas.

I don't see one. :P

Beautiful E score, acceptable S score.

Become a tad more authoritarian and we can be PM soulmates.

The enemy.

Dead center?

Really?

0.00, 0.00?  Or have you just not taken the test yet?

Moderate hero.

That's somewhat ironic, considering that the first post in this quote was directed at you. :P

*SKIP*

*sniff sniff* It's great to see how far you've come, Carl. I remember when it was weird that your E score was as low as +4.

FF if it hasn't changed- its not visible in his posts.

I approve.

Pretty close to mine, so I strongly approve.

Freedom score.

Your score's pretty similar to mine, so I'm gonna go with FS too.

Our S scores are almost the same, you just need to take the opposite of your Econ score and we'd be good :P

I sure hope they do make the right choice

Moderate Hero.

Not bad (I had to check it on your profile).

Good :)

Very nice.

It used to be much better, back when the E score was more around -1 or so. Now, it upsets me every-time I see it. :(

Pretty good, although I also wouldn't mind if that S score was a tad bit lower. ;)

Decent, very decent. The sticking point is the F score, which isn't included in the PM score.

Chandler was a nasty piece of work and then some.

It would be great if your E score was about 8 points to the right. :P

Not too bad. If they flipped, it would be better.

Speaking of which, why don't they have it?

*Skip*

Not bad. I'd prefer 3 or so points higher on both, but a clear A on the Atlas Forum curve :P

It seems to suit his views pretty well: left-centrist on economics, mildly conservative on social issues.

Yes, which is why my PM score is E: -0.06, S: -9.83, not E: HAPPY, S: CHANDLER

TJ: put negative signs on them (well, maybe not the E).

Getting better as you move further to the left on economic policy. You could probably stand to moderate your social score a bit, too. :P

TNF is E: -6.65 and S: -5.13

Nice social score, now just move over to the right a bit on economics and you'd be much better. ;)

Pretty good to me.

Well, you are in the right quadrant of the PM graph :)

E makes me sad :(

A year ago, the numbers were alright, now however... :P

S score looks pretty good, E score a little farther right than I'd prefer

Move at least five points to the left on both of those and we'll be good. But not too much; I don't want you to be Bandit.

I think we'd be fine if you just took that negative sign off your E score :)

A 3-5 point movement to the right on both counts would be good ;)

a perfect pm score

I little more to the center and I'd be enamored ;)

Just a few points to the left on both axes--or, hell, even just the economic--would be nice.

The last time I took it I got E -8.14, S -2.70 or thereabouts.

The E could be a little lower, but it's good :)

Reminds me of a pms'ing teenager........oh, wait.  ;)

Good, but multiply each by 1/2 and it would be better.

Good, but it would be better if you doubled each score. ;)

Good, but it would be better if a little smaller.  Mine doesn't really represent my views because I don't necessarily agree or disagree with the questions in every scenario.

Negative, because it really does represent your views so poorly.

Switch the E and S scores, and make them positive, then... it would be great. However.. I doubt that would happen. So. It's a 'no' from me.

Cool with me.

Moderate heroism >:(

-7.22 on the social scale? Anarchy at its best.

I explained that already.

SKIP

The raw score itself looks great to me.

Exquisite.

I like how they're both round numbers, although I wish the E score didn't have that pesky negative sign. ;)

I too was surprised when it came out that way.

SKIP

Remove the negative signs, and dilate it by a factor of 1/4.

Multiply the economic score by at least 5, and add a few to the social score

Eek.

Fits u well

()

Makes me weep.

Pretty conservative dawg

A tad to the left

I can live with the social score but the econ score...yikes.

I think it'd be different if he retook it. :)

Econ a little too left for me, but otherwise great.

It's fine.  I don't get on people for being moderate on economic matters.  And this person is even more to the left than me on social issues. 

Overall, solid.

Not bad at all.

Good, except for that pesky negative sign in his E score. ;)

Moderate the social score and you're golden

Pretty bad already, but still does not properly represent the mind-numbing absurdity of JCL's actual views.

Surprisingly moderate. I'd have guessed a -6 or more on at least one of them.

No problem with the S score, but you could afford to lob a couple points off of it and onto your E score.

Better than most, but that's to be expected. Can definitely do better than 6, though.

Dirty Librul

Your PM score isn't visible anywhere.



I was surprised as well. So I took the test again and now I'm back at 6.45. :) :P

That's more like it. It is, in his profile.

S score is fine, E score not so much. :P

How doesn't it properly represent my views.

Mind numbing absuridity...... that's a new one.

Scary,, the working class might have to spend a lot of time(unemployed & impoverished) praying at the church or other religious establishment if he gets into any kind of position of power.

Very, very liberal for me.  Frankly, I'd be scared of all the taxes I'd have to pay if you get into a position of power.

A bit too conservative, but within acceptable limits. :P

I just can"t understand why you're an independant in Germany with your PM. I have nothing against your PM, you're typically a leftist, even if I'm not totally agree with you, it doesn't scare me, your political ideas are correct!

Just seem generic centre-left (ish) to me. I wouldn't vote for anyone with that score, but I wouldn't be scared/despairing if they came into power. The social score isn't too bad to be fair.

A tad too conservative on both scales, but the scor e is fine with me.

I appreciate this kind of moderation. Indiana needs politicians like you, like Dick Lugar, like Donnelly. Even if I can disagree with you, you are the best we can have in Indiana to try to represend most of people and to do compromise!

Pretty good PM score with me.  A little to the left of me, but not bad.

good ol moderate

moderate hero

Pretty representative of today's liberal wing of the Democratic Party

A bit too moderate.