Talk Elections

Election Archive => 2012 Elections => Topic started by: Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook on May 17, 2012, 01:05:55 AM



Title: Which pair of candidates is/was worse?
Post by: Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook on May 17, 2012, 01:05:55 AM
Something about 2012 reminds me of 2004, so I made this.


Title: Re: Which pair of candidates is/was worse?
Post by: Young Lawyer on May 17, 2012, 01:17:02 AM
Bush/Kerry was far worse.


Title: Re: Which pair of candidates is/was worse?
Post by: LastVoter on May 17, 2012, 01:24:49 AM
Obama and Romney, Kerry is the best candidate among the four. I don't really see a difference between Mittens and Dubya.


Title: Re: Which pair of candidates is/was worse?
Post by: Napoleon on May 17, 2012, 03:17:40 AM
Bush and Kerry, really only Kerry.


Title: Re: Which pair of candidates is/was worse?
Post by: Donerail on May 17, 2012, 05:57:25 AM
Well, three of them are essentially the same, so I'll go with Kerry.


Title: Re: Which pair of candidates is/was worse?
Post by: BlueSwan on May 17, 2012, 07:42:21 AM
Romney >>> Bush
Obama = Kerry


Title: Re: Which pair of candidates is/was worse?
Post by: They put it to a vote and they just kept lying on May 17, 2012, 07:58:48 AM
All four are virtually the exact same people.


Title: Re: Which pair of candidates is/was worse?
Post by: GLPman on May 17, 2012, 01:46:06 PM
There are definitely similarities between both sets, particularly Romney and Kerry. Obama and Romney are better than Bush and Kerry, though. I'm surprised that some people favor Bush and Kerry. Both men were terrible choices.


Title: Re: Which pair of candidates is/was worse?
Post by: HagridOfTheDeep on May 17, 2012, 02:08:14 PM
I look at it like this. Romney and Kerry and Bush are equal. Obama is worse than the three.


Title: Re: Which pair of candidates is/was worse?
Post by: Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook on May 19, 2012, 02:52:51 PM
All four are virtually the exact same people.

Why do libertarians say stuff like this?


Title: Re: Which pair of candidates is/was worse?
Post by: They put it to a vote and they just kept lying on May 19, 2012, 03:28:52 PM
All four are virtually the exact same people.

Why do libertarians say stuff like this?

()


Title: Re: Which pair of candidates is/was worse?
Post by: SUSAN CRUSHBONE on May 19, 2012, 03:33:17 PM
Thus not actually answering the question.


Title: Re: Which pair of candidates is/was worse?
Post by: They put it to a vote and they just kept lying on May 19, 2012, 03:34:22 PM
I was more poking fun at Libertarians.

I guess the reason Libertarians say that they are "all the same" is because Obama and Romney both support NDAA, The Patriot Act, wars, etc.


Title: Re: Which pair of candidates is/was worse?
Post by: Napoleon on May 19, 2012, 05:29:14 PM
meaning better. I voted that Obama and Romney are worse.


Title: Re: Which pair of candidates is/was worse?
Post by: BaldEagle1991 on May 19, 2012, 06:39:12 PM
Romney > Bush
Kerry > Obama

But I picked Bush/Kerry because Bush was in it.


Title: Re: Which pair of candidates is/was worse?
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on May 19, 2012, 06:39:44 PM
Romney > Bush
Kerry > Obama

But I picked Bush/Kerry because Bush was in it.

This, more or less.


Title: Re: Which pair of candidates is/was worse?
Post by: Indy Texas on May 20, 2012, 08:16:49 PM
Obama > Romney > Bush > Kerry

Therefore, Obama/Romney > Bush/Kerry


Title: Re: Which pair of candidates is/was worse?
Post by: Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook on May 20, 2012, 08:40:21 PM
So, for those who say they are basiclly the same person...

Obama=Romney=McCain=Bush=Kerry=Gore=Dole=Clinton=Bush=Dukakis=Reagan=Mondale=Carter=Ford?