Talk Elections

Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion => Congressional Elections => Topic started by: Miles on July 02, 2012, 02:47:51 AM



Title: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 02, 2012, 02:47:51 AM
This was mostly inspired by Homely's great work on his thread. Basically, I wanted somewhere to post my maps other than the Gallery, ya know? Anyway, for now, this will be a repository for the maps that I have already made and I'll post new ones as I create them! Most of the maps I make are broken down by CD, so I thought that this would be the appropriate board for them!

To open this thread, I have the 2008 Louisiana Senate election by precinct; I've been working on it for the last week or so! I did CD6 a few months ago and just finished the other 5. Enjoy!

() (http://www.pictureshack.us/)

CD1
()

CD2
()

CD3
()

CD4
()

CD5
()

CD6
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: bore on July 02, 2012, 04:10:03 AM
Great work, and a very interesting map. What's really interesting is the spotty nature of the map (as in there is no stretch of uninterrupted republican or democratic territory, apart from maybe the south east). Is this because all the small democratic towns have high black populations, or is something else at play?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 02, 2012, 04:27:23 AM
Yes, the black vote, especially in the rural north, tends to be compressed into fairly compact precincts in the towns. In the rural river parishes (the middle part of CD2), the black voters are more spread out.

Landrieu really had a strong showing with white voters in the eastern part of the coastline (the bottom half of CD1) as well as in suburban New Orleans (where the Landrieu name plays well).

Here's a comparison of Landrieu and Obama by CD:

CD1
Obama- 25%
Landrieu- 43%

CD2
Obama- 73%
Landrieu- 79%

CD3
Obama- 34%
Landrieu- 48%

CD4
Obama- 39%
Landrieu- 51%

CD5
Obama- 36%
Landrieu- 47%

CD6
Obama- 31%
Landrieu- 43%

She outperformed Obama by the greatest margin in CD1, where she ran 36 points ahead of him. Again, even though its based in the conservative areas of Greater New Orleans, the Landrieu name is a venerable asset.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: homelycooking on July 02, 2012, 08:11:24 AM
Congratulations, Miles, you've done some great work here. Could we have some insets of the larger cities (NOLA, Red Stick, Shreveport, etc.)?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on July 02, 2012, 08:15:40 AM
Yes, the black vote, especially in the rural north, tends to be compressed into fairly compact precincts in the towns. In the rural river parishes (the middle part of CD2), the black voters are more spread out.

Landrieu really had a strong showing with white voters in the eastern part of the coastline (the bottom half of CD1)
The oil spill may have helped. (Beyond the obvious and larger factors of French Name and The Landrieu Name, obviously.)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 02, 2012, 08:59:07 AM
Yes, the black vote, especially in the rural north, tends to be compressed into fairly compact precincts in the towns. In the rural river parishes (the middle part of CD2), the black voters are more spread out.

Landrieu really had a strong showing with white voters in the eastern part of the coastline (the bottom half of CD1)
The oil spill may have helped. (Beyond the obvious and larger factors of French Name and The Landrieu Name, obviously.)

This was before the oil spill. Though, I think Landrieu's efforts to secure funds after Hurricane Katrina helped her in that region. The oil spill will help her going forward though.

Congratulations, Miles, you've done some great work here. Could we have some insets of the larger cities (NOLA, Red Stick, Shreveport, etc.)?


Sure, here are a few urban parishes: (I'll post Orleans and Jefferson later today)

Baton Rouge
()

Lake Charles
()

Shreveport
()

Lafayette
()

She won all of those parishes except Lafayette (where she lost by 10,000 votes, but its though sledding for any Democrat now there).

Also, I took a bit of a shortcut. DRA has Presidential data by precinct uploaded; with most of the cities, I assumed that if a precinct was >90% Obama, it was also >90% Landrieu. Thats probably the case for virtually all of them anyway.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on July 02, 2012, 09:01:54 AM
Yes, the black vote, especially in the rural north, tends to be compressed into fairly compact precincts in the towns. In the rural river parishes (the middle part of CD2), the black voters are more spread out.

Landrieu really had a strong showing with white voters in the eastern part of the coastline (the bottom half of CD1)
The oil spill may have helped. (Beyond the obvious and larger factors of French Name and The Landrieu Name, obviously.)

This was before the oil spill.
Brainfart. My apologies.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Fuzzybigfoot on July 02, 2012, 05:48:56 PM
This is very impressive work Miles.  Well done!  :)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 03, 2012, 11:14:07 AM
As promised, here's a close up of New Orleans!

This is most of Orleans parish plus northern Jefferson parish. (I grew up there and I've always considered those areas of Jefferson to be basically part of NOLA anyway, lol).

()

This is very impressive work Miles.  Well done!  :)

Thanks!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: timothyinMD on July 03, 2012, 04:03:32 PM
Good computer software skills there.

I do believe this will be the last map showing a Democratic Senate victory in Louisiana for quite some time


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 04, 2012, 12:35:16 PM
Happy 4th of July everyone!

My next post: NC 2010 Congress. I'll start rolling out individual CDs over the next few days.

()

Also, you can just right-click the image to view the larger version in a new tab, but just in case, here's a link to view the full size map.  (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/72727_nc2010cvi.png)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: homelycooking on July 04, 2012, 12:45:36 PM
I love you, Miles.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 04, 2012, 12:52:43 PM

Hahaha :)



Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Niemeyerite on July 04, 2012, 02:22:31 PM


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on July 04, 2012, 02:26:20 PM
Very nice.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 04, 2012, 03:29:02 PM
Here are the first 3 CDs:

()

()

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 06, 2012, 02:55:32 PM
And for everything else:

()

()

()

()

()

()

()

()

()

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 06, 2012, 05:50:04 PM
Finally, one last thing with the NC 2010 Congressional elections. This is the overall Democratic vote compared to the overall Republican vote.

One of the things I like about this particular election is it shows how an effective gerrymander works. The Democratic candidates, aggregately, only got 45% of the votes cast, but held 7 of the 13 seats (and barely lost the 8th one).

()
()
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: homelycooking on July 06, 2012, 08:01:07 PM

How narrow is that little connection that keeps this district contiguous?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Fuzzybigfoot on July 06, 2012, 09:15:43 PM
Damn Miles, this is incredible! :D


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 06, 2012, 10:09:35 PM

How narrow is that little connection that keeps this district contiguous?

It uses touch-point contiguity. When he drew the districts back in 2001, that was the most efficient way for Brad Miller to include that portion of central Greensboro into his 13th district (thereby picking up Democratic voters) while still keeping the 6th a contiguous GOP vote sink.

Here's a close-up from DRA:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 06, 2012, 11:28:26 PM

'Just trying to keep up with you and Homely ;)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on July 07, 2012, 03:56:35 AM
The Myrick map is hilarious.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: mondale84 on July 07, 2012, 06:54:25 AM
Good computer software skills there.

I do believe this will be the last map showing a Democratic Senate victory in Louisiana for quite some time

Famous last words...

BTW great job, Miles! Stunning work!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 07, 2012, 11:20:16 AM

That's actually the district where I'm registered. Myrick was always popular despite some many of her outlandish views.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on July 08, 2012, 04:12:34 AM

That's actually the district where I'm registered. Myrick was always popular despite some many of her outlandish views.
To be more precise: The way it chops into (somewhat more Republican, surely) precincts of the city it surrounds and the chops then actually being the only places voting for the Democrat looks hilarious. Of course, these are probably "maturing" (democratizing) inner suburbs where a lot changed over ten years, but, well.It looks funny.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: 🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸 on July 08, 2012, 06:16:09 PM

I'm a little surprised Hendersonville doesn't have any D precincts.  Some of the downtown area has an "old hippie" vibe.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 08, 2012, 07:28:02 PM

I'm a little surprised Hendersonville doesn't have any D precincts.  Some of the downtown area has an "old hippie" vibe.

Well, Jeff Miller was (is) based in Hendersonville. Even by state standards, its a very strong Republican county.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 09, 2012, 07:11:09 PM
Enjoy, everyone! I'll have CD breakdowns for this as well :)

()

Link to full-scale image. (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/43406_NC2008GOV.png)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 09, 2012, 10:26:59 PM
Perdue performance vs. McCrory performance:

()
()
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 10, 2012, 05:42:46 PM
'Thinking about what to do next. Hagan/Dole and SC 2010 Congress are what I'm considering.

Any thoughts?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Hash on July 10, 2012, 05:45:04 PM
What explains the Democratic strength in those small mountainous counties in the Smoky Mountains?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 10, 2012, 05:50:02 PM
What explains the Democratic strength in those small mountainous counties in the Smoky Mountains?

That handful of counties, centered around Buncombe, has usually been Democratic in state politics.

I'm actually not sure; my guess is that since its a very poor area, social issues aren't enough to make them a Republican-voting area.

With Perdue specifically, I'm sure her ad with Andy Griffith played well there.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 12, 2012, 09:20:21 PM
Ok, I've decided to do Hagan/Dole next.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 12, 2012, 09:51:04 PM
AHH!! I just realized that I forgot to account for absentee and one-stop voting in about a dozen counties in the NC Governor map. I'll work on fixing that too.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 14, 2012, 09:52:02 PM
Ok, here's the revised NC 2008 Governor map:

()

The one-stop/absentee votes, which I forgot to add in the first iteration, skewed noticeably towards Perdue.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 16, 2012, 03:31:32 PM
'Almost done with Hagan/Dole. Should be posted by tomorrow.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 17, 2012, 01:38:36 AM
'Almost done with Hagan/Dole. Should be posted by tomorrow.

Ok, I'm a bit early, but here we go:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: old timey villain on July 17, 2012, 03:09:24 AM
Pretty cool maps!

The Hagan Dole map actually looks more GOP friendly than the Perdue McCrory one, because I see more blue. I guess Hagan derived her support more from urban and suburban areas moreso that Perdue, who was stronger on rural areas.

My guess as to why NC Central mountains are more D? Well, this is just a guess, but it looks like the core area of Democratic strength centers right around the Great Smoky mountains national park. The area is dependent on government protection to maintain the pristine nature of the mountains, so it's more of a unique dependency on government rather than a fear of it that you find in other appalachian areas.

edit: Also maybe more Native Americans?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Niemeyerite on July 17, 2012, 03:10:41 AM
Hagan won by 8.5% while Perdue id by 3.4% and still she carried more precints than the senator? Surprising :)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on July 17, 2012, 08:32:55 AM
Pretty cool maps!
edit: Also maybe more Native Americans?
That's just a couple of precincts at the western edge of it.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 17, 2012, 10:47:51 AM
Pretty cool maps!
edit: Also maybe more Native Americans?
That's just a couple of precincts at the western edge of it.

Also in Robeson county, where the Lumbee tribe is located. Dole actually performed well there because she introduced bills aimed at recognizing the Lumbee. Perdue and Dalton each got 70% in Robeson, but Dole held Hagan to only 59%.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 17, 2012, 11:05:17 AM
Pretty cool maps!

The Hagan Dole map actually looks more GOP friendly than the Perdue McCrory one, because I see more blue. I guess Hagan derived her support more from urban and suburban areas moreso that Perdue, who was stronger on rural areas.

Hagan won by 8.5% while Perdue id by 3.4% and still she carried more precints than the senator? Surprising :)

Well, that attests to how urbanized the state is becoming; voters are becoming more concentrated in the smaller city precincts.

Perdure swept most of the rural east, but she got blown away in Greater Charlotte, so those kinda cancelled each other out.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 18, 2012, 11:53:00 PM
'Expanding my range to Virginia:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 19, 2012, 01:56:20 PM
Even though Etheridge lost the seat in 2010, he remained on good terms with Democrats in his old district. He beat Dalton there by 36 points in the Gubernatorial primary a few months ago.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Vern on July 19, 2012, 04:03:41 PM
It would be cool if you could do CD primary maps.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 19, 2012, 04:35:28 PM
It would be cool if you could do CD primary maps.

The GOP Pres primary this year wouldn't be very interesting, but yeah, I'll definitely look into doing those from 2008.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 19, 2012, 04:58:02 PM
Just from looking at the county results map (https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?fips=37&year=2012&f=0&off=5&elect=1), I'd say Etheridge also won the new 2nd; the old/new 7th would probably be close as well. I'll do those next.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 19, 2012, 07:07:37 PM
Etheridge also got a pretty decent win the new 7th:

()

Johnston county provided much of Etheridge's winning margin; without it, he still would have carried the district but only with 42.5% to Dalton's 41.5%.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: homelycooking on July 19, 2012, 08:44:12 PM
Etheridge also got a pretty decent win the new 7th:

()

Johnston county provided much of Etheridge's winning margin; without it, he still would have carried the district but only with 42.5% to Dalton's 41.5%.

Yeah baby! Who was the third candidate in this primary? where was his strength concentrated?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: nclib on July 19, 2012, 09:03:36 PM
Etheridge also got a pretty decent win the new 7th:

()

Johnston county provided much of Etheridge's winning margin; without it, he still would have carried the district but only with 42.5% to Dalton's 41.5%.

Yeah baby! Who was the third candidate in this primary? where was his strength concentrated?

Bill Faison, St. Rep. from Orange and Caswell counties. Won only Caswell county.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 19, 2012, 09:12:22 PM
Etheridge also got a pretty decent win the new 7th:

()

Johnston county provided much of Etheridge's winning margin; without it, he still would have carried the district but only with 42.5% to Dalton's 41.5%.

Yeah baby! Who was the third candidate in this primary? where was his strength concentrated?

Bill Faison, St. Rep. from Orange and Caswell counties. Won only Caswell county.

I only tallied totals for Etheridge and Dalton, but I'd say Faison pulled about 7-9% in this district. Faison's best county here was New Hanover, where he got 10%.

Other than  Dalton, Etheridge and Faison, the reaming 7% or so of the votes here were pretty fractured between 3 other minor candidates.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 19, 2012, 11:42:08 PM
I meant to post this here a few days ago, but I posted it over in the NC Congressional races thread instead. Anyway, I've moved it here:

This is a look at the swing between the 2002 and 2008 cycles.

()
()
()
()

The county that swung the most against Dole was Meckleburg, closely followed by Hagan's Guilford base. Pretty much, all the major urban areas swung D by at least 20 points or better.

A few observations:

-In 2002, Dole framed herself as something of a maverick who would work in a bipartisan manner. However, as evidenced by things like her 92% party loyalty score and her Godless as, by 2008, her image as a moderate has eroded.

-Dole made inroads with blacks (winning 25%) and women in 2002, however, nominating a woman for Senate and a black man for President in 2008 helped Democrats to neutralize Dole's advantages with them.

-Perdue, McCrory and Hagan all ran ahead of their party's Presidential nominees in their home counties. Hagan did 9 points better than Obama in Guilford, Perdue did 28 points better than him in Craven and McCrory did 25 points better than McCain in Mecklenburg. Dole was the exception to this rule. While McCain got 61% in Rowan county, Dole was limited to less than 54%.

-For some reason, Bowles performed really well in the northeastern region; thats the only way I can account for the swing towards Dole there.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 20, 2012, 11:42:13 AM
Here's the new 2nd. Etheridge didn't win here by as much he did in his old district, but he still got an outright majority.

()

The old 2nd was a gerrymander, but at least it had some rhyme and reason to it: it was anchored in Johnston county while on its periphery, it took in >70% Obama parts of Raleigh and Fayetteville. Overall, the liberal urban areas cancelled out Johnston to make it a Democratic-leaning seat.  

This new district is just an incoherent mix of central NC, Cary/Apex and Fayetteville cobbled together to be as Republican-friendly as possible.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 20, 2012, 11:50:40 AM
Other than the 3 I've done so far, probably the only other district which was competitive was the old 7th. I'll do that next; 'should be pretty close.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Vern on July 20, 2012, 01:28:29 PM
Love your maps.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 20, 2012, 01:42:58 PM

:)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 20, 2012, 04:05:29 PM
Finally, the old 7th. It was narrow Etheridge win, though the % going to the minor candidates was relatively high here.

Interesting how the two tied yellow precincts in the middle separate the green 'Etheridge side' from the  red 'Dalton side.'

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 20, 2012, 09:18:18 PM
What they look like paired together:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: 🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸 on July 20, 2012, 11:49:24 PM
'Expanding my range to Virginia:

()

I find this map oddly mesmerizing. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 21, 2012, 12:02:38 AM
'Expanding my range to Virginia:

()

I find this map oddly mesmerizing.  

Just from looking at it, I'd say Goode won. Charlottesville cancelled out all those >60% Goode precincts in the southern part though.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 21, 2012, 02:30:19 AM
Because of vern's idea, my next set of CD maps will be from the 2008 Democratic Presidential primaries!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 21, 2012, 03:40:40 PM
Kicking off my 2008 Pres Primary maps:

()


I did CD2 first.

Pretty much what I expected, though those few Clinton precincts in Fayetteville kinda stand out at me since they're surrounded by overwhelmingly Obama, heavily black precincts.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 22, 2012, 09:31:23 PM
I have another Obama/Clinton map coming soon...but it won't be from NC! ;)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 22, 2012, 10:55:51 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: homelycooking on July 22, 2012, 10:59:06 PM
Oh, that's gorgeous. Well done. (Can I recommend color-striping the tied precincts, though?)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 22, 2012, 11:02:38 PM
Oh, that's gorgeous. Well done. (Can I recommend color-striping the tied precincts, though?)

Yeah, I might start doing that as opposed to using another color (yellow in this case).


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 23, 2012, 01:25:45 AM
Comparing %'s for Obama and Clinton:

()
()
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: homelycooking on July 23, 2012, 03:27:05 PM
An aesthetic tip: The shades of green are not terribly distinct at the <50% level, you may want to use a different color. When I make a series of related strength maps, I prefer to use the same color for all of them - usually blue or red.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 28, 2012, 01:11:01 AM
As I mentioned before, I'm also working on breaking down my 2 previous statewide maps of NC by CD. I'll post them as I finish them; here are 3 sets of districts I've done so far:

()
()
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 28, 2012, 08:01:08 AM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 28, 2012, 10:45:43 AM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 31, 2012, 06:25:40 PM
An aesthetic tip: The shades of green are not terribly distinct at the <50% level, you may want to use a different color. When I make a series of related strength maps, I prefer to use the same color for all of them - usually blue or red.

Ok, good idea Homely.

I'll keep using the green for my regular mapping, but for these strength-related maps, I'll stick to red for Ds and blue for R's.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 31, 2012, 10:16:32 PM
Shifting gears back to the Democratic primary; here are 3 more districts. Thanks to Fuzzy for helping me crunch the numbers for these! :)

()
()
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 01, 2012, 01:31:34 AM
This is a pretty simple map, but I've been wondering for a while what the results of this race were on a CD-basis. With the runoff in TX last night, I thought I might as well do this map.

()

CD1: A pretty lackluster showing for Lincoln here, considering this was her base. Still, the results here almost exactly matched the state as a whole.

CD2: Lincoln performed very well in Little Rock, despite Halter's efforts to court Pulaski liberals; that accounts for Lincoln's fairly large margin here.

CD3: Also very close to the state as whole, but this historically R district has noticeably fewer registered Democrats than the other 3.

CD4: Texarkana served as a solid base for Halter in both the primary and runoff. There was a clear dichotomy here; Halter won the counties Texarkana corner of the district while Lincoln got stronger as the district moved towards the Delta. Halter's strength the west was enough for him to carry the district though, making CD4 a mirror opposite of the statewide picture.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 02, 2012, 03:40:48 AM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 02, 2012, 06:23:27 AM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 12, 2012, 01:00:33 AM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 12, 2012, 02:33:49 AM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 12, 2012, 03:42:13 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: nclib on August 12, 2012, 04:06:50 PM
Miles, could you do other state maps by CD, perhaps gay marriage. This seems like a good format:

This is a pretty simple map, but I've been wondering for a while what the results of this race were on a CD-basis. With the runoff in TX last night, I thought I might as well do this map.

()



Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 12, 2012, 04:09:22 PM
Miles, could you do other state maps by CD, perhaps gay marriage. This seems like a good format:

This is a pretty simple map, but I've been wondering for a while what the results of this race were on a CD-basis. With the runoff in TX last night, I thought I might as well do this map.

()


Yeah, sure. AR was easy because of its had whole counties, but I'll see what else I find :)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 12, 2012, 08:39:06 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 20, 2012, 08:38:45 AM
Ok, I'll pick up the pace here in a while with the Obama/Clinton maps.

I only have 3 or 4 more districts until I'm done with the entire state of NC!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on August 20, 2012, 06:09:12 PM
Ok, I'll pick up the pace here in a while with the Obama/Clinton maps.

I only have 3 or 4 more districts until I'm done with the entire state of NC!

I want to see the 6th!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 20, 2012, 07:51:44 PM
Ok, I'll pick up the pace here in a while with the Obama/Clinton maps.

I only have 3 or 4 more districts until I'm done with the entire state of NC!

I want to see the 6th!

Ok, I'll do CD6 next!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 24, 2012, 12:36:37 AM
This may be a bit random, but I did this set of maps today:

()

()

()

Turner was basically unopposed in 2000, so I skipped that cycle. It would be cool if I could get precinct results from these TX maps.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 27, 2012, 07:32:21 PM
()


I have the Greensboro and Burlington hands of CD13 done; I should only have CD4 left after that.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 28, 2012, 03:48:19 AM
More Arkansas maps:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 28, 2012, 03:32:11 PM

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 28, 2012, 04:42:01 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 28, 2012, 05:28:11 PM
And here we are:

()

Direct Link. (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/41331_NC2008PDF.png)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 29, 2012, 12:06:22 AM
Well, I guess I can't say I was disappointed when I crunched the numbers for this map; I knew going in that the result wasn't going to be something I liked!

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Fuzzybigfoot on August 29, 2012, 12:14:10 AM
And here we are:

()

Direct Link. (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/41331_NC2008PDF.png)

Great work!  :D


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: homelycooking on August 29, 2012, 07:39:38 AM
You're the best, Miles.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 29, 2012, 12:39:19 PM
Thanks guys!

I'll be off of class until Friday as the hurricane blows over, so what better to do than work on maps! lol


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Incipimus iterum on August 29, 2012, 12:41:47 PM
Thanks guys!

I'll be off of class until Friday as the hurricane blows over, so what better to do than work on maps! lol
agreed lol


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 29, 2012, 01:32:25 PM
Ughhh.....

Kissell's district was 15 points worse than McIntyre's.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 29, 2012, 01:48:47 PM
Here's how Amendment 1 is performing in the districts I've done son far:

()
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 29, 2012, 07:58:36 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 29, 2012, 10:15:40 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 30, 2012, 12:32:13 AM
And for the primary:

()

There were more Republicans running, but only these four actually carried precincts.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 30, 2012, 04:47:26 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 08, 2012, 12:49:36 PM
A pretty obvious dynamic here; the non-Buncombe part (82% of the district) voted 77% Yes while it failed by 20 points in Buncombe county.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 08, 2012, 01:08:12 PM
An updated statewide map:

()

(sorted by most to least conservative)
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: nclib on September 08, 2012, 08:27:53 PM
Miles, if you can, it would be interesting seeing those maps for the old (current) CD's which much better reflect communities of interest.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: morgieb on September 08, 2012, 08:53:24 PM
Looking at those maps, they really test the rules of contingency.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 10, 2012, 10:39:44 AM
Speaking of testing the rules of contingency, I don't think I posted CD4 on this thread:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 10, 2012, 10:42:47 AM
Miles, if you can, it would be interesting seeing those maps for the old (current) CD's which much better reflect communities of interest.

Once I make all the new CDs, I'll fit them together into a state map and them break that map down again into the old CDs :)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on September 10, 2012, 10:44:03 AM
So it had that southern appendage only to keep some Republicans out of the second district?

EDIT: Nope, that's the new map. Makes for an... odd... look.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 10, 2012, 10:47:15 AM
So it had that southern appendage only to keep some Republicans out of the second district?

Well, that was the most efficient way for CD4 to pick up Democratic voters in Fayetteville.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on September 10, 2012, 10:49:20 AM
So it had that southern appendage only to keep some Republicans out of the second district?

Well, that was the most efficient way for CD4 to pick up Democratic voters in Fayetteville.
Although they weren't all that Democratic.

But of course they didn't have much leeway trying to shore up the second, retake the 8th and not make the 7th less Republican in the process. There's quite a lot of people in Fayetteville after all.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 10, 2012, 10:58:36 AM
So it had that southern appendage only to keep some Republicans out of the second district?

Well, that was the most efficient way for CD4 to pick up Democratic voters in Fayetteville.
Although they weren't all that Democratic.

But of course they didn't have much leeway trying to shore up the second, retake the 8th and not make the 7th less Republican in the process. There's quite a lot of people in Fayetteville after all.

The 4th's part of Fayetteville is 71% Obama, so that went a long way towards shoring up Ellmers.

One Democratic legislator proposed an amended map (http://ncga.state.nc.us/GIS/Download/District_Plans/DB_2011/Congress/Fourth_Fair_Legal_and_Compact/Maps/mapSimple.pdf) putting Cumberland county almost entirely in CD2 and making CD4 much more compact. It would have brought CD2 to 52% McCain, down from 55.7%, while unpacking the 4th.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 15, 2012, 01:22:56 PM
()

CD13 was 12% less conservative than the states as whole; Amendment 1 actually fell short of 55%.

The most interesting part of the equation here was Wake county. Despite narrowly voting for McCain (he got 50-51% there, IIRC), the Wake part of the 13th voted 53% Against. The electorate there behaved very similarly to that of the Mecklenburg voters over in CD9.

There seemed to be either low turnout in the rurals, high turnout in Wake, or something of a combination between the two. Wake county cast 70% of the ballots, while, in terms of registered voters, makes up 62% of the district.

The numbers for the rural counties may be slightly off, as there was an rather excessive amount of precinct-splitting with CD1.

()
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Gass3268 on September 15, 2012, 01:56:00 PM
Miles, have you posted the gay marriage map for district 1? I looked through the thread and I couldn't find it. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Incipimus iterum on September 15, 2012, 02:09:19 PM
great maps miles :D


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 15, 2012, 02:25:38 PM
Miles, have you posted the gay marriage map for district 1? I looked through the thread and I couldn't find it.  

I actually did CD1 within a few weeks after the election, before I made this thread, so I guess I never got around to posting it.

Despite being heavily Democratic, it voted almost exactly the same as the state as a whole. In fact, outside of Durham, it passed with 67%.

()

I always thought this district looks like a jellyfish lol


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Gass3268 on September 15, 2012, 04:42:18 PM
Miles, have you posted the gay marriage map for district 1? I looked through the thread and I couldn't find it.  

I actually did CD1 within a few weeks after the election, before I made this thread, so I guess I never got around to posting it.

Despite being heavily Democratic, it voted almost exactly the same as the state as a whole. In fact, outside of Durham, it passed with 67%.

()

I always thought this district looks like a jellyfish lol

It does look like a jellyfish. I wonder how the vote in this district would have changed if it took place after Obama came out in favor of Gay Marriage?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 15, 2012, 06:33:36 PM

Looking at the statewide CD map, it would interesting to gerrymander a third Against district.

Actually, it probably wouldn't be that hard. You'd probably just have to give the Wake arm of the 4th to the 13th, as the 4th could absorb more For voters; the 13th would then shed some rural counties and should then be an Against district.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 15, 2012, 07:13:06 PM

Looking at the statewide CD map, it would interesting to gerrymander a third Against district.

Actually, it probably wouldn't be that hard. You'd probably just have to give the Wake arm of the 4th to the 13th, as the 4th could absorb more For voters; the 13th would then shed some rural counties and should then be an Against district.


Actually, a fourth Against district would also be feasible. You could give more Against voters in Charlotte to the 9th while pulling some strongly-For precincts in Union and Iredell out of the district. To keep the 12th Against, it could expand more into Greensboro and W-S.

If the VRA wasn't an issue, Durham could be used to possibly squeeze out a fifth district. But where would you use Durham? Maybe you could target CD2, as Ellmers was against the Amendment anyway.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on September 15, 2012, 08:11:13 PM
I noticed that Dare County (where I've been on vacation several times; it's in Jones's district) voted for McCain but against Amendment 1. Any reason for this?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 15, 2012, 08:22:03 PM
I noticed that Dare County (where I've been on vacation several times; it's in Jones's district) voted for McCain but against Amendment 1. Any reason for this?

Well, during the debate on Amendment 1, the Democrats argued that it would hurt tourism in the state; I guess that argument sold well in Dare county.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: nclib on September 15, 2012, 09:07:17 PM

Looking at the statewide CD map, it would interesting to gerrymander a third Against district.

Actually, it probably wouldn't be that hard. You'd probably just have to give the Wake arm of the 4th to the 13th, as the 4th could absorb more For voters; the 13th would then shed some rural counties and should then be an Against district.


Actually, a fourth Against district would also be feasible. You could give more Against voters in Charlotte to the 9th while pulling some strongly-For precincts in Union and Iredell out of the district. To keep the 12th Against, it could expand more into Greensboro and W-S.

If the VRA wasn't an issue, Durham could be used to possibly squeeze out a fifth district. But where would you use Durham? Maybe you could target CD2, as Ellmers was against the Amendment anyway.

I would bet that the old 13th may be Against (or at least close). It would be interesting to gerrymander the most Against CD possible--would prob. be Orange, Durham, most of Wake, and part of Chatham.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 15, 2012, 09:53:05 PM
The old 13th was very close; it failed in Raliegh and Greensboro, but that wasn't enough to offset its landslide margins elsewhere:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: socaldem on September 20, 2012, 02:40:04 AM
And for the primary:

()

There were more Republicans running, but only these four actually carried precincts.

The Amendment 1 maps and the republican nominees weakness in Mecklenberg County are making me somewhat bullish on Jennifer Roberts. She seems kind of Kay Hagen-esque. I think this has potential to be one of the upsets of the cycle.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on September 20, 2012, 02:46:59 AM
Funny you say that. Roberts release an internal poll earlier this week showing the race as a dead heat: http://votejenniferroberts.com/new-poll-shows-race-a-dead-heat/


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 20, 2012, 03:21:25 AM
Well, both Roberts and Pittenger are well known in the district. Roberts has been on the Mecklenburg County Board of Commissioners for 8 years and Pittenger represented southern Charlotte in the State Senate.

That said, Myrick always overperformed the Republican bend of this district, and I don't think all of her unique strength will carry over to Pittenger. Also, I think Roberts was as good a Democrat as we could have run here.

Hagan came within 4 points of Dole there in 2008, losing 50-46; for now, I see that as more or less Roberts' ceiling. The district is obviously trending Democrat, so maybe when Pittenger retires (or makes a gaffe) the Democrats could pick this up down the line.

The poll has Roberts winning the Mecklenburg part of the district by 11, which I'm not sure I buy. Obama lost the Mecklenburg portion by a few tenths of a percentage point; Pittenger beat Dalton there by 12 points in 2008. Pittenger also got 68% in the Union part and 65% in Iredell in 2008, so I think its reasonable that he'll at least duplicate those margins this year.

Looking at the composition of the district, 71% of the vote comes from Mecklenburg, 14% from Union and 15% from Iredell.

If Pittenger matches his 2008 margins in Union and Iredell, and Roberts actually wins Mecklenburg by 10 points, Pittenger still wins 50-49.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 20, 2012, 05:59:00 PM
According to DRA, the Republican average of the Mecklenburg chunk of NC-09 is 57%, though it was only 50% McCain. Pretty tough sledding. Don't forget that Pittenger had no problem slapping down $2 million of his own wealth to win the nomination.

Don't get me wrong, I'd like to see Roberts win (I'll be voting for her), but I'm skeptical that this will end up being close.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 21, 2012, 08:56:02 AM
If there are any other insomniacs creative souls like myself who want to make precinct maps for NC, I hope this will help. I've uploaded my basic shape templates for each CD as well as a map of the entire state (where I've integrated the split precincts).

Just follow the links here, copy the maps into Paint/Paint.Net and you're good to start coloring.

This are for my standard-scale maps, though I'll have an even larger version coming down the pipe.


CD1  (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/2502_cd1rucho.png)
CD2 (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/81928_CD2RUCHO.png)
CD3 (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/52026_cd3rucho.png)
CD4 (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/28941_cd4rucho.png)
CD5 (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/63382_CD5RUCHO.png)
CD6 (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/53780_cd6rucho.png)
CD7 (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/37794_cd7rucho.png)
CD8 (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/12885_CD8RUCHO.png)
CD9 (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/58957_CD9RUCHO.png)
CD10 (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/64482_CD10RUCHO.png)
CD11 (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/28023_CD11RUCHO.png)
CD12 (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/85020_CD12RUCHO.png)
CD13 (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/4615_cd13rucho.png)


The individual districts should all be consistent with this statewide map (colors based on the standard DRA scheme):
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 27, 2012, 12:39:31 AM
Southeastern NC is one of my personal favorite places, electorally speaking; its an area where conservaDems, like Kissell and McIntyre do very well. So, I always watch results there especially closely.

Here's Senate District 13, consisting of Robeson and Columbus counties. Despite the new VRA Senate districts and vote-packing by the Republicans, this is still the most heavily Democratic Senate district; less than 13% of voters in this district are registered Republicans.

I'm pretty sure that this was also the most pro-Amendment 1 district. Between the Robeson and Columbus counties, it passed with 85.8%.

I thought the visual contrast between Amendment 1's 72-point win and the registration gap (72-13 Democratic) would be interesting.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 28, 2012, 01:26:04 AM
It actually passed with less than 60% in CD6!

()

This supports my observation of higher turnout in the more educated areas. Between Guilford, Orange and Durham Counties, it narrowly failed 50.4-40.6. Likewise, those three counties collectively make up about 46% of the district but they cast 54.6% of the ballots.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 28, 2012, 11:37:59 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 28, 2012, 11:41:51 PM
With all 13 CDs!

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 28, 2012, 11:59:21 PM
I've done the entire statewide precinct map, but does anyone know a website I can use to upload a 6600 X 2830 pixel image?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 29, 2012, 12:58:51 AM
'And here we go:

()

Link. (http://imageshack.us/a/img259/5858/nca1statewide.png)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 29, 2012, 12:42:27 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: nclib on September 29, 2012, 06:31:47 PM
'And here we go:

()

Link. (http://imageshack.us/a/img259/5858/nca1statewide.png)

That map really shows how dominant Amendment One was in rural areas. Only 40 (of 100) counties had even a single precinct against it.

In addition to the 8 counties that voted against (Orange, Durham, Wake, Mecklenburg, Chatham, Buncombe, Watauga, Dare), here are the others with the likely area in opposition to the amendment, in order of overall pro-gay vote:

Guilford   (Greensboro)
New Hanover   (Wilmington, coast)
Forsyth   (Winston-Salem)
Polk   (Tryon (artsy community))
Pitt   (Greenville (East Carolina U.))
Jackson   (Cullowhee (Western Carolina U.))
Transylvania   
Warren   
Moore   
Northampton   
Alamance   (Burlington/Elon)
Hyde   (coast)
Washington   (coast)
Craven   (New Bern, coast)
Pasquotank   (coast)
Hoke   
Carteret   (coast)
Franklin   
Henderson   
Halifax   
Currituck   (coast)
Cumberland   (Fayetteville)
Wilson   (Wilson)
Beaufort   (coast)
Nash   (Rocky Mount)
Lenoir   (Kinston)
Bertie   (coast)
Catawba   (Hickory)
Rowan   (Salisbury)
Davidson   (Thomasville)
Burke   
Stanly

Any comments about the others--perhaps a fluke in some cases...


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: homelycooking on September 29, 2012, 07:46:46 PM
If there are any other insomniacs creative souls like myself who want to make precinct maps for NC, I hope this will help.

For all our sakes, Miles, I hope your insomnia is never cured. ;D


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Skill and Chance on September 29, 2012, 08:32:43 PM

Very interesting map.  It looks like the GOP map drawers may have underestimated the amount of demographic change in the Charlotte suburbs.  That district doesn't look bad midterm proof at all. 

It also looks like FOR performed almost exactly at 2008 McCain levels in the 13th?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 30, 2012, 01:48:46 AM
As usual, thanks to everyone for their input!

I've gotten a request to sort out the Amendment 1 results by the old CDs, so I'll be rolling those out as my next batch of maps (in addition to some other miscellaneous projects I'm working on!).


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 30, 2012, 12:03:35 PM
This was the clown car highly-competitive Republican primary to replace Bart Gordon. I think this is a pretty neat map. 'Good thing for Black that Rutherford County was excised from the new district.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on October 02, 2012, 01:26:44 AM
Since the old iteration of the 11th included the entirety of Bumcombe county, it was considerably more Against than the Republican version. Comparing the districts, it dropped from 71% For, under the new map, to 63% under the old lines, still a few points more conservative than the state.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on October 02, 2012, 02:31:43 AM
Amendment 1 passed in the old 9th by a noticeably larger margin than it did in the new 9th; it passed by 14% in the former versus 6% in the latter. These are the purely geographic reasons that I can think of to account for the difference:

-The old 9th was less Mecklenburg-centric. 60% of its population came from Mecklenburg but it when it was redrawn, that number was up to 70%.

-The new 9th contains less of Union county. Likewise, the Union precicnts that the new 9th retained were collectively less For (69%) than the old 9th's chunk of Union (73%).

-The new 9th traded out 75.5% For Gaston precincts in favor of slightly more liberal Iredell precincts, 73.3%.


()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on October 02, 2012, 02:32:35 PM

Any comments about the others--perhaps a fluke in some cases...

Something that I noticed was the county discrepancy in Rocky Mount. It passed by relatively lukewarm margins in the Edgecombe half of the city but passed in a landslide in the Nash precincts.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on October 02, 2012, 05:23:45 PM
Well, since the old and new CD2 only share 29% of precincts, not much use in comparing them. Though, while the new CD2 is slightly more conservative than the state, Amendment passed by a heftier 2:1 in the old version.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on October 03, 2012, 01:25:26 AM
Here's how the statewide map is looking so far under the old lines:

()

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on October 08, 2012, 03:20:03 AM
I crunched the numbers for a few more districts (I'll try to have the actual individual CD maps out this week):

()
()

-The old 10th actually ties the new 8th in terms of highest % For (77.4%).

-The new 5th is a few points more liberal, as it loses Surry county but picks up more of Forsyth.

-The 7th is more or less unchanged. The old version was 69.6% and the new one is 69.9%. While the old one included all of New Hanover, liberal Wilmington was cancelled out by the presence of 86% For Robeson county.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on October 20, 2012, 01:17:35 AM
Here's what it looks like when a Republican wins a D+25 district:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Gass3268 on October 20, 2012, 11:17:31 AM
Here's what it looks like when a Republican wins a D+25 district:

()

So it looks like Cao did well with liberal whites, I'm I reading that right?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on October 20, 2012, 02:20:50 PM

So it looks like Cao did well with liberal whites, I'm I reading that right?

Yeah, there were quite a few >70% Obama white-majority precincts that Cao won.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on October 21, 2012, 02:02:11 AM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on October 21, 2012, 08:52:35 PM
Cazayoux would have lost in 2010 anyway, but this election was nonetheless very frustrating:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: nclib on October 21, 2012, 08:59:19 PM
I was comparing the pro-gay% in areas of counties in black-majority CDs vs. the county vote. It looks like the black areas were more pro-gay (though perhaps because of white liberals moreso in such areas).

New CD-1            
           Gay%   other CDs   Gay% (in other CDs)

Beaufort   46.8%   3   26.5%
Chowan   31.3%   3   20.1%
Craven     38.0%   3    35.4%
Durham    66.5%   4,6,13     71.2%
Edgecombe   31.7%   13   19.6%
Franklin      40.1%   13   30.9%
Gates      28.1%   3   25.1%
Granville      32.6%   6,13   32.3%
Greene      26.4%   3   21.9%
Lenoir      36.5%   3,7   21.7%
Martin      34.1%   3   20.9%
Nash      18.3%   13   26.5%
Pasquotank   37.0%   3   28.5%
Perquimans   41.2%   3   30.6%
Pitt      38.3%   3   38.6%
Vance      28.8%   13   20.9%
Wayne      33.2%   13   18.3%
Wilson      32.0%   13   28.3%

New CD-12         
        Gay%   other CD's    Gay% (in other CDs)

Cabarrus    43.6%   8   29.2%
Davidson    29.2%   5,8   24.4%
Forsyth      54.5%   5   46.8%
Guilford      52.8%   6   49.0%
Mecklenburg   55.0%   8,9   53.9%
Rowan     34.1%   5,8   22.9%


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Fuzzybigfoot on October 21, 2012, 09:08:01 PM
Wow, it's amazing to see so many of Cazayoux's solid precincts in BR drop 2 or more shades Democrat.  I guess that's what happens when another Democrat runs.  lol 



Great job, btw.  :)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 15, 2012, 11:40:50 AM
Here's a look at the non-Presidential statewide results in NC this year. I averaged the performance of the candidates from the 9 Council of State races on a county-level basis.

Democrats won the races for Auditor (Wood), Insurance Commissioner (Goodwin), SoS (Marshall), Superintendent of Public Institution (Atkinson) and Treasurer (Cowell). Jim Cooper was unopposed for AG, so he wasn't included here.

Republicans flipped the Governorship with McCrory and held their offices as Agriculture Commissioner (Troxler) and Sec. of Labor (Berry).

The LG race is currently too close to call with Dan Forest (R) ahead of Linda Coleman (D) 50.12%-49.88%.

Overall, between the 9 races, the parties were very close. Democrats got 50.3% of the share and Republicans got 49.7%.

()

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Sol on November 16, 2012, 03:21:42 PM
Here's a look at the non-Presidential statewide results in NC this year. I averaged the performance of the candidates from the 9 Council of State races on a county-level basis.

Democrats won the races for Auditor (Wood), Insurance Commissioner (Goodwin), SoS (Marshall), Superintendent of Public Institution (Atkinson) and Treasurer (Cowell). Jim Cooper was unopposed for AG, so he wasn't included here.

Republicans flipped the Governorship with McCrory and held their offices as Agriculture Commissioner (Troxler) and Sec. of Labor (Berry).

The LG race is currently too close to call with Dan Forest (R) ahead of Linda Coleman (D) 50.12%-49.88%.

Overall, between the 9 races, the parties were very close. Democrats got 50.3% of the share and Republicans got 49.7%.

()

()
How come Coleman won Jackson and Swain?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 16, 2012, 11:07:53 PM

How come Coleman won Jackson and Swain?

They're both pretty Democratic. Even in 2008, Obama won Jackson and only lost Swain by 2.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on November 21, 2012, 08:01:35 PM
Wow, this is a great thread.  You've put a lot of work into all of those maps.

If you are still doing maps, one that would be cool is the old District 7 vote for Congress this year.  I'm thinking McIntyre would've won it by a pretty large margin, seeing as he outperformed his 2010 numbers in many parts of the district that were left in tact (he barely won New Hanover in '10, but this year he won the gerrymandered Republican half of New Hanover narrowly).

A few questions I noticed in the thread, I'll answer them even though they're several months old.

Democratic strength in Smoky Mtns?  Partly because of economics.  Also because of the national park, which is obviously government run and brings a lot of tourism to the area.  And due to the environment; North Carolina doesn't have mining of any type (except in Mitchell County), so our mountain people are more pro-environment than the rest of Appalachia.

Elizabeth Dole strength in Northeastern North Carolina? Norfolk media market, most federal races are generic D vs. generic R.  State races lean more Democratic because the area has strong Democratic roots.

Do we have a shot at district 9?  Don't think so, unless the demographics change dramatically.  Obama worked really hard to GOTV in Charlotte so 60-61% is a ceiling for Democrats, unless you have a Democrat on the state level who is winning by a landslide.  South Charlotte is one of the few areas of NC that is more Republican in local/state races than federal ones.  Democrats rarely won Mecklenburg until Kerry won it in 2004.



Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 21, 2012, 08:15:12 PM
Wow, this is a great thread.  You've put a lot of work into all of those maps.

Thank you :) Did you check out my 2012 NC thread here too?
Quote
If you are still doing maps, one that would be cool is the old District 7 vote for Congress this year.  I'm thinking McIntyre would've won it by a pretty large margin, seeing as he outperformed his 2010 numbers in many parts of the district that were left in tact (he barely won New Hanover in '10, but this year he won the gerrymandered Republican half of New Hanover narrowly).

Yes, I'm guessing the old 7th would have been 57-58% Dem this year, up from 54% in 2010. McIntyre improved in the areas that he held, but there was some dropoff with the parts that went to the new 8th though; Kissell had most of Robeson county this year and he only got 69% there (McIntyre got 72% in 2010 and 86% in 2008).
 
Quote
Do we have a shot at district 9?  Don't think so, unless the demographics change dramatically.  Obama worked really hard to GOTV in Charlotte so 60-61% is a ceiling for Democrats, unless you have a Democrat on the state level who is winning by a landslide.  South Charlotte is one of the few areas of NC that is more Republican in local/state races than federal ones.  Democrats rarely won Mecklenburg until Kerry won it in 2004.

Pittenger will probably become entrenched. Otherwise, if he leaves, I could see it being competitive by 2016 or so. Roberts far exceeded by expectations this year. Just over the past 10 years, Mecklenburg has gone from 39% nonwhite to 49%; that trend has definitely bled over into south Charlotte.  


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 25, 2012, 05:56:50 PM
Wow, this is a great thread.  You've put a lot of work into all of those maps.

If you are still doing maps, one that would be cool is the old District 7 vote for Congress this year.  I'm thinking McIntyre would've won it by a pretty large margin, seeing as he outperformed his 2010 numbers in many parts of the district that were left in tact (he barely won New Hanover in '10, but this year he won the gerrymandered Republican half of New Hanover narrowly).

I did some preliminary math for the old CD7. For President, it wouldn't be statistically changed from 2008; I got 52.3/46.7 Romney. The Congressional vote was about 56.3/43.7 Democratic (up from 54/46 in 2010). 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 13, 2012, 06:06:19 AM
This has actually been in the works for a while; I just recently compiled all these maps into a coherent chart. This is West Virginia's Congressional history from 1952 to 2012. 1952 was the first year that Robert Byrd was elected to Congress.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on December 13, 2012, 07:00:15 AM
You are wonderful.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Gass3268 on December 13, 2012, 02:39:59 PM
Great West Virginia map series! It will  be crazy in 2020 when they in all likelihood slide down to two seats. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: homelycooking on December 13, 2012, 02:46:36 PM
This has actually been in the works for a while; I just recently compiled all these maps into a coherent chart. This is West Virginia's Congressional history from 1952 to 2012. 1952 was the first year that Robert Byrd was elected to Congress.

Oho! The gauntlet is thrown and the battle joined. ;)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 13, 2012, 08:55:44 PM
Thanks, everyone! :)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on December 14, 2012, 12:27:54 PM
Two notes: While you have different maps for 1968 and 1970, you have the same data. I suppose this is an error in the 1970 data?

What the hell happened in the first district in '72?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 14, 2012, 12:35:31 PM
Two notes: While you have different maps for 1968 and 1970, you have the same data. I suppose this is an error in the 1970 data?

What the hell happened in the first district in '72?

Thanks. I must have switched the D and R data for CD1 in 1972. Arch Moore held that seat, but Bob Mollohan won it in 1968 and held it until 1983.

I'll fix those things (there were a lot of maps to keep track of!).

My favorite map is 2000. The light blue Republican district (Capito) looks funny sandwiched between the two dark red districts (Rahall and Mollohan both going unopposed).  


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 21, 2012, 11:11:23 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Fuzzybigfoot on December 21, 2012, 11:19:51 PM
lol 9 precincts lol


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 21, 2012, 11:44:17 PM
'Easy to see why Bart Gordon retired!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: morgieb on December 22, 2012, 01:20:15 AM
I'm more surprised Gordon held the district for as long as he did. R+13 is pretty tough, particularly given it was more suburban than rural.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on December 23, 2012, 10:36:31 PM
I'm more surprised Gordon held the district for as long as he did. R+13 is pretty tough, particularly given it was more suburban than rural.

The district that Gordon held in the 2000's was about three points more Dem than the current TN-06.  It included only moderately Republican(for Tennessee) and somewhat locally Dem Rutherford county, which was removed, and didnt include some now super Republican counties like Coffee, Fentriss, and Cumberland that were added to the district for 2012. 

Ironically, Democrats drew this district in 2001 so that they would have a decent chance of holding it when Gordon retired by removing fast growing and overwhelmingly Republican and suburban Williamson county.  That sure turned out well. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 25, 2012, 10:49:10 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 04, 2013, 11:12:59 PM
LA-04 in 2008

()


If the election was in November instead of December, that would have probably done the trick for Carmouche; he would have had Presidential turnout and upticket help from Landrieu. Even so, I suppose this district would have been hard for any Democrat to hold down the line in 2010.

The results by parish:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 05, 2013, 04:47:07 PM
Fun fact about MilesC56: My aunt and uncle are in the FBI and they oversaw the prosecution of Bill Jefferson.


()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on January 05, 2013, 04:51:08 PM
Out of curiosity, how racially polarized is that map? At least some areas look like a sharp black/white divide.

(and on that note, did Obama win whites in New Orleans in either 2008 or 2012?)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 05, 2013, 05:09:20 PM
Out of curiosity, how racially polarized is that map? At least some areas look like a sharp black/white divide.

(and on that note, did Obama win whites in New Orleans in either 2008 or 2012?)

Basically, the wealthier (read whiter) a precinct was, the more likely it was to vote against Jefferson. Jefferson held serve in the 9th ward and into Mid-City and Gentilly, all heavily black areas.

I haven't sifted through 2012 yet, but in 2008, Obama won the majority-white VAP precincts in Orleans Parisg 58-39. The big exception to that was Lakeview, the neighborhood that I was born and raised in (its on the western end of the parish is actually in CD1). Lakeview is 85%-ish white and was 67-31 McCain.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on January 05, 2013, 07:15:58 PM
LA-04 in 2008

()


If the election was in November instead of December, that would have probably done the trick for Carmouche; he would have had Presidential turnout and upticket help from Landrieu. Even so, I suppose this district would have been hard for any Democrat to hold down the line in 2010.

The results by parish:

()

Democrats should have sued when Jindal tried to help Republicans by scheduling a needless runoff election in December.  There was no reason not to have the primary in early October as usual and then the general election/or runoff on election day in early November. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: homelycooking on January 05, 2013, 07:58:27 PM
Gray precincts in Vernon Parish?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 05, 2013, 08:03:45 PM

They were empty.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on January 06, 2013, 07:10:56 AM
Fun fact about MilesC56: My aunt and uncle are in the FBI and they oversaw the prosecution of Bill Jefferson.


()
This better become a series with the two 2006 elections and the 2008 general and ideally the 2010 and 2012 generals as well. Else I am going to be very disappointed.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 06, 2013, 03:56:58 PM
This better become a series with the two 2006 elections and the 2008 general and ideally the 2010 and 2012 generals as well. Else I am going to be very disappointed.


Ok, sure!

I already have the 2008 general. (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=155525.msg3474304#msg3474304)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on January 08, 2013, 05:49:17 AM
This better become a series with the two 2006 elections and the 2008 general and ideally the 2010 and 2012 generals as well. Else I am going to be very disappointed.


Ok, sure!

I already have the 2008 general. (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=155525.msg3474304#msg3474304)
Actually, strike 2012 I guess. (Not that I wouldn't like to see it - I would - but it'd not really part of the series.)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 18, 2013, 03:35:48 PM
Ok, guys, I just got off the phone with a guy from the NC State Board of Elections. He said that most early and absentee votes should be allocated by precinct by next week. Thats been the main holdup for me so far, otherwise I would have made tons of NC 2012 stuff out by now.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 20, 2013, 08:45:21 PM
I came across these maps of the 2011 legislative elections that I had forgotten about:

My uncle, Rep. Chris Hazel, won reelection in 2011. Chris holds a seat based in eastern Rapides Parish; his opponent was actually endorsed by Jindal. In the previous session, Chris and Jindal had crossed swords over the privatization of the state's prisons. (http://www.myopusmedia.com/view/full_story/19074699/article-Rep--Chris-Hazel-Speaks-Out?instance=video_player) Though I thought this would be closer, Chris swept all but 1 precinct in the district.

()

This was another interesting race that turned out quite nicley; Rep. Nick Larusso is a good family friend. Because of the population loss, New Orleans lost a seat in the State House. Nick was drawn with another Representative, Johnny Labruzzo. Labruzzo had a reputation for being an aggressive blowhard; among other things, he was known for being "unapologetically pro-life" (http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2011/04/metairie_legislator_files_bill.html) and advocated a plan that would sterilize welfare recipients. (http://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/2008/09/labruzzo_sterilization_plan_fi.html) Its politicians like LaBruzzo that make Louisiana look bad.

Nick and LaBruzzo had each represented about 50% of the new district. Nick's base was in the Orleans Parish neighborhood were I grew up, Lakeview. LaBruzzo is from an area across the canal in Jefferson Parish called Bucktown. Looking at the map, its pretty obvious where Orleans ends and Jefferson starts.

What worried me here was that LaBruzzo has campaign signs everywhere. It seemed like you saw his face at every darn intersection. Thankfully, on election day, Nick did a better job of turning out his base. In Nick won the Orleans precincts 70/30, while LaBruzzo only carried his Jefferson turf 60/40.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on January 21, 2013, 05:55:52 AM
Its politicians like LaBruzzo that make Louisiana pro-lifers look bad.
Corrected.
Quote
Looking at the map, its pretty obvious where Orleans ends and Jefferson starts.
Painfully obvious.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: morgieb on January 21, 2013, 06:51:33 AM
What sort of politics does your uncle have?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 21, 2013, 01:29:45 PM

I'd consider him a pretty generic R. He ran on 'family values' both times.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: morgieb on January 21, 2013, 04:02:13 PM

I'd consider him a pretty generic R. He ran on 'family values' both times.
Ah. Here I was thinking he was Tea Party lol.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 21, 2013, 04:44:02 PM

LOL, quite the opposite.

He's been accused of being a RINO in the past!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: smoltchanov on January 22, 2013, 07:15:31 AM

LOL, quite the opposite.

He's been accused of being a RINO in the past!

It's Louisiana after all)) You can't be "too conservative" there)) But easily - "too liberal")))


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on January 22, 2013, 08:08:17 AM
Both of these seem to have been races where the too-conservative guy lost... the cajun primary is back and no Democrat filed, so they were R-R races on a GE turnout. And in that situation you can still be quite easily too conservative.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: smoltchanov on January 22, 2013, 08:59:32 AM
Both of these seem to have been races where the too-conservative guy lost... the cajun primary is back and no Democrat filed, so they were R-R races on a GE turnout. And in that situation you can still be quite easily too conservative.

It was a sort of irony. There are no really moderate Republican officeholders in Louisiana i am aware of. Even moderate conservative... So, frequently, it's a fight between very and extremely conservative candidates. In SUCH situation very conservative candidate (Boustany, for example) can win over extremely conservative (Landry) of course, but that doesn't make him less conservative)))


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on January 22, 2013, 09:14:36 AM
Both of these seem to have been races where the too-conservative guy lost... the cajun primary is back and no Democrat filed, so they were R-R races on a GE turnout. And in that situation you can still be quite easily too conservative.

It was a sort of irony. There are no really moderate Republican officeholders in Louisiana i am aware of. Even moderate conservative... So, frequently, it's a fight between very and extremely conservative candidates. In SUCH situation very conservative candidate (Boustany, for example) can win over extremely conservative (Landry) of course, but that doesn't make him less conservative)))
It makes him less conservative than the other guy. -_-


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: smoltchanov on January 22, 2013, 09:39:34 AM
Both of these seem to have been races where the too-conservative guy lost... the cajun primary is back and no Democrat filed, so they were R-R races on a GE turnout. And in that situation you can still be quite easily too conservative.

It was a sort of irony. There are no really moderate Republican officeholders in Louisiana i am aware of. Even moderate conservative... So, frequently, it's a fight between very and extremely conservative candidates. In SUCH situation very conservative candidate (Boustany, for example) can win over extremely conservative (Landry) of course, but that doesn't make him less conservative)))
It makes him less conservative than the other guy. -_-

True...


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 22, 2013, 09:48:28 AM
Both of these seem to have been races where the too-conservative guy lost... the cajun primary is back and no Democrat filed, so they were R-R races on a GE turnout. And in that situation you can still be quite easily too conservative.

It was a sort of irony. There are no really moderate Republican officeholders in Louisiana i am aware of. Even moderate conservative... So, frequently, it's a fight between very and extremely conservative candidates. In SUCH situation very conservative candidate (Boustany, for example) can win over extremely conservative (Landry) of course, but that doesn't make him less conservative)))
It makes him less conservative than the other guy. -_-

True...

This is why I'm a centrist.

'Forget ideological purity, its usually a choice between the lesser of two evils now..Boustany vs. Landry would be a good example.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 23, 2013, 01:12:13 AM
And here we geaux!!

I finally have the precinct data for NC!

Let's start off with one of my favorite results of the night! :D


()


Performance Maps:

MCINTYRE
()

ROUZER
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: old timey villain on January 23, 2013, 01:39:42 AM
Hey Miles, love your maps! I had a quick question about Landrieu.

We've seen so many of the southern dem senators fall since she took office in 1997, but she keeps getting reelected, even in '08 with Obama at the top of the ticket- I assume he was NOT popular there, even then. She's approaching legacy status, what with her family name and her three terms, but she's by no means safe. All of her elections have been very close. It seems like she's perennially unpopular with about half of the electorate but she keeps holding on, so how does she do it??

edit: she won by seven in 2008, so not that close, but still kinda close!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: smoltchanov on January 23, 2013, 02:04:14 AM
This is why I'm a centrist.

'Forget ideological purity, its usually a choice between the lesser of two evils now..Boustany vs. Landry would be a good example.

Me too (though i am more conservative fiscally and more liberal socially then you). And exactly by the same reasons)))


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on January 23, 2013, 08:08:26 AM
And here we geaux!!

I finally have the precinct data for NC!

Let's start off with one of my favorite results of the night! :D
Too close for comfort. Barrow's was much more heartening.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 23, 2013, 04:37:54 PM
()

Well, I'm a bit surprised here. I wasn't expecting south Charlotte to trend R. This kinda complicates my "NC-09 will be truly competitive within the next 10 years theory."

Romney's improvement seemed to radiate out from the South Park neighborhood, where I went to high school. South Park is a very wealthy area, so it makes sense that Romney would rebound there.

Generally speaking, Romney was a much better fit for south Charlotte than McCain. Romney's greater appeal coupled with Obama's overperformance there in 2008 made for a pretty noticeable Republican swing.

I was a bit disappointed with my own precinct, 114. If you look at the trend map, near the southern corner of the county, 114 is the light blue one directly on top the bright red precinct that looks like downward-facing crescent.

Despite swinging 20 points to Obama and voting Against Amendment 1, it trended about 4% Republican. Its pretty upper-middle class, though not nearly as wealthy as South Park, and heavily white, so Romney was a good candidate for the precinct.

For reference, here's how my precinct voted in the past:

2000: 66/34 Bush
2004: 67/32 Bush
2008: 57/42 McCain
2012: 61/38 Romney
Amendment 1: 53/47 Against



Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Skill and Chance on January 23, 2013, 05:02:11 PM
()

Well, I'm a bit surprised here. I wasn't expecting south Charlotte to trend R. This kinda complicates my "NC-09 will be truly competitive within the next 10 years theory."

Romney's improvement seemed to radiate out from the South Park neighborhood, where I went to high school. South Park is a very wealthy area, so it makes sense that Romney would rebound there.

Generally speaking, Romney was a much better fit for south Charlotte than McCain. Romney's greater appeal coupled with Obama's overperformance there in 2008 made for a pretty noticeable Republican swing.

I was a bit disappointed with my own precinct, 114. If you look at the trend map, near the southern corner of the county, 114 is the light blue one directly on top the bright red precinct that looks like downward-facing crescent.

Despite swinging 20 points to Obama and voting Against Amendment 1, it trended about 4% Republican. Its pretty upper-middle class, though not nearly as wealthy as South Park, and heavily white, so Romney was a good candidate for the precinct.

For reference, here's how my precinct voted in the past:

2000: 66/34 Bush
2004: 67/32 Bush
2008: 57/42 McCain
2012: 61/38 Romney
Amendment 1: 53/47 Against



Romney did seem to overperform in most of the Southern educated suburb counties that were touted as big D trending areas in 2008.  The federal government areas of VA were the only real exception to this.  What was also interesting to me was the D trend in the rural South this time in areas removed from coal mining.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Benj on January 23, 2013, 05:22:45 PM
Here's what it looks like when a Republican wins a D+25 district:

()

So it looks like Cao did well with liberal whites, I'm I reading that right?

Cao won almost literally every non-black voter in the district in 2008.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Bacon King on January 23, 2013, 05:42:51 PM
Democrats should have sued when Jindal tried to help Republicans by scheduling a needless runoff election in December.  There was no reason not to have the primary in early October as usual and then the general election/or runoff on election day in early November. 

There was one really big legitimate reason that the elections got delayed, you know:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: old timey villain on January 23, 2013, 05:58:32 PM
Does anybody have some precinct level data on Atlanta or metro Atlanta? Obama didn't lose too much ground there and some counties swung towards him, but I'd like to see it broken down.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 23, 2013, 06:46:37 PM
Does anybody have some precinct level data on Atlanta or metro Atlanta? Obama didn't lose too much ground there and some counties swung towards him, but I'd like to see it broken down.

I haven't done any GA maps in the past, though I'm trying to cobble together GA-12. Maybe after that I'll look at Atlanta. The problem with GA is that the names of the voting districts don't always match the shapefiles that I get from DRA.

Basically with Landrieu, there are a few things. There are a lot of people in some of the bigger parishes, like Livingston, Lafayette and Ouachita who I really don't think would ever vote Democrat. Her base obviously Greater New Orleans; she's been making inroads in other cities, like Baton Rouge, Shreveport and Lake Charles to help offset those three aforementioned parishes. She's also very popular along the River Parishes and along the Delta. The Cajun last name also helps in Acadiana.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Bacon King on January 23, 2013, 06:49:55 PM
Does anybody have some precinct level data on Atlanta or metro Atlanta? Obama didn't lose too much ground there and some counties swung towards him, but I'd like to see it broken down.

any specific counties you'd like to see?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: old timey villain on January 23, 2013, 07:46:47 PM
Does anybody have some precinct level data on Atlanta or metro Atlanta? Obama didn't lose too much ground there and some counties swung towards him, but I'd like to see it broken down.

any specific counties you'd like to see?

Gwinnett, Cobb, North Fulton. I doubt south dekalb/south fulton are that interesting and the data on the outer suburbs would just depress me.

Oh yeah, maybe douglas, newton, henry, rockdale


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 24, 2013, 02:11:55 AM
Nash County has the distinction of being one of only a handful of McCain -> Obama counties in the country.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 24, 2013, 04:41:32 AM
Cumberland (Fayetteville) and Robeson (Lumberton) counties, both strongly Democratic, swung to Obama.

Though Robeson was one of Amendment 1's best counties, it swung almost 4 points towards Obama. In fact, while southeastern NC was a very pro-Amendment 1 area, several other counties there actually swung towards Obama too. Ergo, I don't think Obama's stance on marriage was as detrimental to his standing in the state as some were making it out to be. (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=154810.msg3325668#msg3325668)

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Skill and Chance on January 24, 2013, 03:26:24 PM
That's all very fascinating to me, Miles.  What do you think was behind the swing toward Obama in East NC?  It also looks like it was mainly a rural phenomenon save for Fayetteville... 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 24, 2013, 04:22:19 PM
That's all very fascinating to me, Miles.  What do you think was behind the swing toward Obama in East NC?  It also looks like it was mainly a rural phenomenon save for Fayetteville... 

I think its similar to what happened in the rest of the deep south. McCain was a better fit for those areas than Romney.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 25, 2013, 01:51:45 AM
Despite being from Johnston County, Rouzer "only" carried it 60/40 over McIntyre while Romney won it 63/36 over Obama.

This compares Romney's margins to Rouzer's:

()

Romney performed better in every precinct. If Rouzer matched Romney's performance against McIntyre, he would have gone from a 50.1/49.9 loss to a 50.8/49.2 win districtwide.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 25, 2013, 05:41:34 AM
Happy Friday!

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: homelycooking on January 25, 2013, 08:24:07 AM
Must be nice to be making precinct maps of a state that didn't redraw its precinct boundaries after the Census. Jealous... >:(


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 25, 2013, 08:40:23 AM
Must be nice to be making precinct maps of a state that didn't redraw its precinct boundaries after the Census. Jealous... >:(

Yes! Its quite a luxury!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 26, 2013, 03:31:37 PM
My beloved Congressional district:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 26, 2013, 07:56:25 PM
This was probably the closest State Senate race in the country. Rep. Bill Cook upset Sen. Stan White by 21 votes out of about 87,000 cast.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on January 27, 2013, 12:08:56 AM
Wow, that Mecklenburg County map is really striking.  What happened in South Charlotte?  A few thoughts...

1) the DNC did a really good job of registering new minority voters
2) the DNC may have had a negative effect on downtown?  IDK, did the extra traffic piss everyone off or something?
3) Surprising that Myers Park would swing most heavily against Obama since it was already the most Republican part of South Charlotte... Republicans did not have as much room to improve
4) Hmm, not sure about the theory that Romney was more acceptable than McCain.  Romney seemed like more of a partisan a-hole to me.

Keep the maps coming, though.  A map of Watauga County would be interesting.

By the way - if there is a way to do a precinct map of any Atlanta area counties, as someone else mentioned, that would be interesting.  Since Atlanta, politically, seems like a bigger version of Charlotte, it would be interesting to see if the same patterns and trends place there.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Sol on January 27, 2013, 12:20:36 AM
Wow, that Mecklenburg County map is really striking.  What happened in South Charlotte?  A few thoughts...

1) the DNC did a really good job of registering new minority voters
2) the DNC may have had a negative effect on downtown?  IDK, did the extra traffic piss everyone off or something?
3) Surprising that Myers Park would swing most heavily against Obama since it was already the most Republican part of South Charlotte... Republicans did not have as much room to improve
4) Hmm, not sure about the theory that Romney was more acceptable than McCain.  Romney seemed like more of a partisan a-hole to me.

Keep the maps coming, though.  A map of Watauga County would be interesting.

By the way - if there is a way to do a precinct map of any Atlanta area counties, as someone else mentioned, that would be interesting.  Since Atlanta, politically, seems like a bigger version of Charlotte, it would be interesting to see if the same patterns and trends place there.
You can get map of Watauga county here:
http://results.enr.clarityelections.com/NC/Watauga/43018/114036/Web01/en/summary.html

The pattern is, predictably, Boone vs. the rest of the county.

Oh, and if we're doing requests, Foxx vs. Motsinger would be interesting.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 27, 2013, 12:21:24 AM
Yeah, those are good guesses.

Obama lost the Myers Park/South Park area 55/45 in 2008; the statewide average is 62/38 in the R's favor. Obama definitely overperformed there in 2008.
  
Watauga is coming!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 27, 2013, 01:32:31 AM

The pattern is, predictably, Boone vs. the rest of the county.

Yep. Only 3 precincts trended D, and two of those were in Boone.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on January 27, 2013, 02:13:18 PM
Cool.  Interesting to see that the movement towards Romney was not among college students  but the more rural parts of the county.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Horus on January 27, 2013, 02:32:51 PM

Looking at the Triangle trend map.. are we seeing the extremely early beginnings of the realignment of the Republican party? Rich, socially liberal fiscally conservative young college grads moving into the center of cities, gentrifying minority neighborhoods and moving the strongest D precincts further out. Or was Romney just a better fit for these voters? Or both?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Sol on January 27, 2013, 02:43:29 PM
Cool.  Interesting to see that the movement towards Romney was not among college students  but the more rural parts of the county.
Actually, one of the precincts that trended Romney contained ASU. That was more of a dead cat bounce than anything though.

Watauga County can be divided into several areas and communties, which explain the voting patterns:

-The Town of Boone, which is dominated by the University and the people associated with. It's dominated by transplants and Northern-Influenced southerners, and It tends to be strongly Democratic.

-The Town of Blowing Rock, which is the second largest town in the County. Blowing Rock is very touristy and is dominated by retirees from Florida. It tends to lean republican, although the Democrats can be competitive.

-The rest of the county tends to be fairly Republican and typically Appalachian, with a good smattering of White liberals and moderates who live in the country due to high housing prices in Boone. There are also some more retirees.

To win in Watauga county, a Democrat needs to either rack up large margins in the Boone Precincts and/or make inroads in the rest of the County.



Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on January 27, 2013, 05:43:33 PM

Looking at the Triangle trend map.. are we seeing the extremely early beginnings of the realignment of the Republican party? Rich, socially liberal fiscally conservative young college grads moving into the center of cities, gentrifying minority neighborhoods and moving the strongest D precincts further out. Or was Romney just a better fit for these voters? Or both?

That is a very interesting theory.  However, these trends are just comparing Obama '12 to Obama '08, but if you compared Obama '12 to Kerry '04, Gore '00, or Clinton, I think you would still see a strong Democratic trend in white areas of Wake and Mecklenburg County.
Cool.  Interesting to see that the movement towards Romney was not among college students  but the more rural parts of the county.
Actually, one of the precincts that trended Romney contained ASU. That was more of a dead cat bounce than anything though.

Watauga County can be divided into several areas and communties, which explain the voting patterns:

-The Town of Boone, which is dominated by the University and the people associated with. It's dominated by transplants and Northern-Influenced southerners, and It tends to be strongly Democratic.

-The Town of Blowing Rock, which is the second largest town in the County. Blowing Rock is very touristy and is dominated by retirees from Florida. It tends to lean republican, although the Democrats can be competitive.

-The rest of the county tends to be fairly Republican and typically Appalachian, with a good smattering of White liberals and moderates who live in the country due to high housing prices in Boone. There are also some more retirees.

To win in Watauga county, a Democrat needs to either rack up large margins in the Boone Precincts and/or make inroads in the rest of the County.



Good points.  You seem to be someone who is familiar with the area, so do you know why Mitchell & Avery Counties are so heavily Republican?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 27, 2013, 05:50:37 PM
Cool.  Interesting to see that the movement towards Romney was not among college students  but the more rural parts of the county.

I actually was kinda expecting Johnson to do better around Boone. He only cracked 4% in one precinct.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on January 27, 2013, 07:25:48 PM
I was surprised by Johnson's lackluster performance nationwide.  I thought with all the cynicism about both Obama and Romney, a third party would do better.  He only got 3% in New Mexico.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Sol on January 27, 2013, 08:06:45 PM
.
Cool.  Interesting to see that the movement towards Romney was not among college students  but the more rural parts of the county.
Actually, one of the precincts that trended Romney contained ASU. That was more of a dead cat bounce than anything though.

Watauga County can be divided into several areas and communties, which explain the voting patterns:

-The Town of Boone, which is dominated by the University and the people associated with. It's dominated by transplants and Northern-Influenced southerners, and It tends to be strongly Democratic.

-The Town of Blowing Rock, which is the second largest town in the County. Blowing Rock is very touristy and is dominated by retirees from Florida. It tends to lean republican, although the Democrats can be competitive.

-The rest of the county tends to be fairly Republican and typically Appalachian, with a good smattering of White liberals and moderates who live in the country due to high housing prices in Boone. There are also some more retirees.

To win in Watauga county, a Democrat needs to either rack up large margins in the Boone Precincts and/or make inroads in the rest of the County.



Good points.  You seem to be someone who is familiar with the area, so do you know why Mitchell & Avery Counties are so heavily Republican?
[/quote]
I think you might be asking the wrong question- Watauga is the anomaly. The counties of Northwestern NC are extremely conservative in that traditional Appalachian way- A bit like East Tennessee. Avery was one of Alf Landon's best counties in 1936. Mitchell County is particularly conservative, which seems to be due to the area's isolation and homogeneity.

Oh, & I live around Boone, so yeah.



Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: old timey villain on January 27, 2013, 09:45:59 PM
Miles, could you do Chatham County, GA?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 27, 2013, 10:02:07 PM
Miles, could you do Chatham County, GA?

I'll work on it. Chatham County changed around some precinct names between the elections, but I'll see.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on January 28, 2013, 05:44:42 AM
.
Cool.  Interesting to see that the movement towards Romney was not among college students  but the more rural parts of the county.
Actually, one of the precincts that trended Romney contained ASU. That was more of a dead cat bounce than anything though.

Watauga County can be divided into several areas and communties, which explain the voting patterns:

-The Town of Boone, which is dominated by the University and the people associated with. It's dominated by transplants and Northern-Influenced southerners, and It tends to be strongly Democratic.

-The Town of Blowing Rock, which is the second largest town in the County. Blowing Rock is very touristy and is dominated by retirees from Florida. It tends to lean republican, although the Democrats can be competitive.

-The rest of the county tends to be fairly Republican and typically Appalachian, with a good smattering of White liberals and moderates who live in the country due to high housing prices in Boone. There are also some more retirees.

To win in Watauga county, a Democrat needs to either rack up large margins in the Boone Precincts and/or make inroads in the rest of the County.



Good points.  You seem to be someone who is familiar with the area, so do you know why Mitchell & Avery Counties are so heavily Republican?
I think you might be asking the wrong question- Watauga is the anomaly. The counties of Northwestern NC are extremely conservative in that traditional Appalachian way- A bit like East Tennessee. Avery was one of Alf Landon's best counties in 1936. Mitchell County is particularly conservative, which seems to be due to the area's isolation and homogeneity.

Oh, & I live around Boone, so yeah.
[/quote]ASU has the coolest mascot ever.  That's just about all I know about the place.

Avery and Mitchell have been Republican since the Civil War.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 31, 2013, 11:01:04 AM
Ok, here's the plan for the next few weeks (or months): Hopefully, I'll begin rolling out Pres-by-CD maps of NC within the next day or so. I'll start with CD1 then go numerically until the entire map is done. I'll probably do the same for the Congressional, LG and Gubernatorial races (probably in that order). I'll also probably work in some LA maps along the way!

Also, I was looking back and I need to make a few relatively minor revisions to the Perdue/McCrory state map I posted over the summer.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: homelycooking on January 31, 2013, 11:13:50 AM
Ok, here's the plan for the next few weeks (or months): Hopefully, I'll begin rolling out Pres-by-CD maps of NC within the next day or so. I'll start with CD1 then go numerically until the entire map is done. I'll probably do the same for the Congressional, LG and Gubernatorial races (probably in that order). I'll also probably work in some LA maps along the way!

Also, I was looking back and I need to make a few relatively minor revisions to the Perdue/McCrory state map I posted over the summer.


Oh it must be so nice to work with official statewide data. I'd really like to make the maps I do without spending months and hundreds of dollars chasing county/municipal officials around for photocopies of their barely legible, hand-written canvass reports.

You're a lucky bastard, Miles. >:(


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 01, 2013, 05:09:54 PM
NC-01 was notable as it was among the fairly few CDs that swung to Obama. This map took me longer than I would liked, mostly because I had to do separate calculations for the (unnecessarily) split precincts in Greenville and Rocky Mount. The other districts should be faster as the precinct-splitting is more or less confined to CDs 1, 3 and 13.

()

CALCULATIONS. (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/12487_CD1SHEET.png)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 01, 2013, 07:59:48 PM
()

CALCULATIONS. (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/56948_CD2STATS.png)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: nclib on February 01, 2013, 08:49:24 PM
Miles, can you finish your Amendment 1 by old CD maps. Also, comparing Obama/Romney to Amendment One may be more telling than Obama/McCain esp. in fast-growing areas.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 01, 2013, 09:43:58 PM
Ok, I can do the old maps; I have the statewide map for Amendment 1, so I can just carve out the shapes of the old districts and run the county/precinct calculations on them.

I think the Romney/Obama map would be good to have though.

For the larger counties, I can do maps of 2008/2012 trend vs Amendment 1.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on February 01, 2013, 10:58:50 PM
Wow.  That one little precinct in Bertie County sure does hate Obama.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 03, 2013, 04:45:12 AM
Amendment 1 under the old CDs:

()

()

COUNTY-LEVEL CALCULATIONS BY CD (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/10287_NCA1STATS.png)

I'll have the shapefiles up later; the actual calculations were more important, so I did those first.

For comparison, here is the map by the new CDs.
 (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/18200_NCA1NEW.png)
A few points:

- Though I posted otherwise earlier, I actually revisited CD13; the amendment actually failed there by about 2,000 votes.

- This map is more consistent than the new one. For example, every district east of CD12 (excluding 4 and 13) are all the same shade of blue.

- The old 12th would have been narrowly in favor of the amendment while the new one was slightly Against. This was likely a result of the Democratic packing. Kissell's hand into Mecklenburg voted 62/38 Against; when those precincts were transferred from Kissell to Watt, that turned the new 12th into an Against district.

- As I suspected, despite being less Democratic than the new version, the old CD4 was more Against. This is because the old CD4 took in more of the Triangle and did not reach down to heavily Democratic but socially conservative Fayetteville. The removal of of most of Durham also made the 4th less Against, but conversely made the new CD1 less For.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 04, 2013, 03:46:00 PM
()

Precinct 42, the striped one south of Winston-Salem, had 0.00% swing.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Obamanation on February 04, 2013, 04:26:01 PM
Great maps, Miles! Were you thinking of putting together maps for other Southern states? I would love to see maps of the Appalachian region. Mississippi would also be pretty cool. I would also love to help out in any way I can.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 04, 2013, 04:45:08 PM
Great maps, Miles! Were you thinking of putting together maps for other Southern states? I would love to see maps of the Appalachian region. Mississippi would also be pretty cool. I would also love to help out in any way I can.

I'm doing a few with LA as well. I'll probably be doing more southern maps, but not for the swing/trend.

NC is convenient in that the precinct labels and shapes from 2008 are the same as they the ones from 2012. This makes calculating the swing/trend very simple; its a nice apples-to-apples comparison.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 05, 2013, 06:25:16 AM
The Jacksonville/New Bern area. These 5 counties also happen to make up State Senate districts 2 (Carteret, Craven, Pamlico) and 6 (Onslow, Jones).

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 06, 2013, 12:07:43 AM
For these swing/trend maps, I'll be doing two more; I'll have a swath of counties in southeatsern NC stretching from Columbus to Pender, plus I'll do Buncombe as well.

'Any more swing/trend trend requests for NC?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 06, 2013, 07:34:45 AM
Damn; I forgot to save the swing map for Southeastern NC. That will be be next; here's the trend:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 06, 2013, 07:42:09 AM
Whoah, this looks really neat:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Torie on February 06, 2013, 01:05:47 PM
Why did those inner city precincts in Winston-Salem and Greensboro trend so strongly Dem? Are they getting more black?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on February 06, 2013, 02:39:33 PM
^^More minority voters were registered to his election and that helped to bump Obama's numbers in some precincts.  Dems in NC really did a good job at getting out the vote, as it was one of few states where Obama got more votes in 2012 than 2008; Republicans just did better, though.

Miles:  Thanks for the Southeast NC maps.  It looks like parts of Wilmington had the same swings as Charlotte and Raleigh, with the $$$ money areas around Wrightsville Beach going strong for Romney.  Those areas were also against Amendment One.

An interesting map to add to your list would be an Obama/Dalton comparison map.  Believe it or not there were a few counties in the East and the West where Obama did worse than poor ol' Walter Dalton.  Dalton didn't do well enough to win any Romney counties, although he nearly won Columbus and Chowan.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 06, 2013, 02:49:32 PM
^^More minority voters were registered to his election and that helped to bump Obama's numbers in some precincts.  Dems in NC really did a good job at getting out the vote, as it was one of few states where Obama got more votes in 2012 than 2008; Republicans just did better, though.


This is what I was going to, Torie. I think the swing to Obama in black precincts was a function of the better OFA turnout operation.

The swing in the Triad lines up nicely with the racial map:

()

The heavily black precincts make a crescent shape in Greensboro and a backslash in W-S. Less than a handful of these precincts trended R.

Quote
Miles:  Thanks for the Southeast NC maps.  It looks like parts of Wilmington had the same swings as Charlotte and Raleigh, with the $$$ money areas around Wrightsville Beach going strong for Romney.  Those areas were also against Amendment One.

An interesting map to add to your list would be an Obama/Dalton comparison map.  Believe it or not there were a few counties in the East and the West where Obama did worse than poor ol' Walter Dalton.  Dalton didn't do well enough to win any Romney counties, although he nearly won Columbus and Chowan.

I think I'll add Sampson, Duplin, Scotland and Hoke counties to that big map; I think that would make it look more complete :D

Dalton even lost Columbus County; its voted for McCain and Romney, but no local Democrat should lose there. I think what was also embarrassing was the he lost his home county, Rutherford. I know that its though sledding for any Democrat, but he emphasized being from a "small town" in his ads and he won it by 20 points in hos 2008 LG race.

I can do an Obama vs. Dalton county map.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 09, 2013, 12:12:28 AM
The swing in the souteastern corner:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 09, 2013, 12:50:53 AM
'Finishing up Southeastern NC!

SWING
()

TREND
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 13, 2013, 01:10:51 AM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 15, 2013, 02:49:38 AM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 15, 2013, 02:51:35 AM
Breaking with the numerical order I've been going with, it made more geographical sense to do this CD next.

I usually like to crunch my own numbers for these, but between Wake County and all the precinct splits with CD1, I deferred to DKE here for the calculations.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 15, 2013, 11:57:28 PM
I thought this thread was getting a bit too NC-centric.

Here's a little change-up:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: nclib on February 16, 2013, 12:08:39 PM
Miles, it would be good to see NC county maps with the CD lines superimposed to see the effectiveness of the gerrymander. Wake County in particular looks like a maximum Dem pack in NC-4.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 16, 2013, 12:21:08 PM
Miles, it would be good to see NC county maps with the CD lines superimposed to see the effectiveness of the gerrymander. Wake County in particular looks like a maximum Dem pack in NC-4.

I made this a while back:

()

Thats based on the Congressional vote.

I'm keeping the county-level tallies of the Pres-by-CD maps, so I can do one like that with the Presidential data after I calculate all the districts.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on February 16, 2013, 12:46:32 PM
Miles, it would be good to see NC county maps with the CD lines superimposed to see the effectiveness of the gerrymander. Wake County in particular looks like a maximum Dem pack in NC-4.

I made this a while back:

()

Thats based on the Congressional vote.

I'm keeping the county-level tallies of the Pres-by-CD maps, so I can do one like that with the Presidential data after I calculate all the districts.

Why the Obama DOJ ever precleared this monstrosity is completely beyond me.  What Republicans did to NC-04 didnt even create a black majority district.  They should have argued that this took away black voter influence in the 2nd, 7th and 8th.  The 4th going any lower than Wake county should have been a clear red flag. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 16, 2013, 01:21:45 PM
I wish the Democrats had seen the writing on the wall (as they were trailing by 11 on the generic ballot going in November 2010) and passed an independent commission. Any commission map would be better than this.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on February 16, 2013, 02:52:37 PM
I wish the Democrats had seen the writing on the wall (as they were trailing by 11 on the generic ballot going in November 2010) and passed an independent commission. Any commission map would be better than this.

I guess they are just really, really stupid.  I saw this coming as early as June 2010, when polls of Democratic state House and Senate districts were coming out showing Democratic incumbents traiing badly.  They should have seen this and immediately got to work to pass an independent commission.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Badger on February 16, 2013, 03:14:06 PM
Any reason the gop couldn't have repealed the commission right after taking power? The commission probably wouldn't even have prepared a proposed map by january2011.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on February 16, 2013, 03:18:32 PM
Any reason the gop couldn't have repealed the commission right after taking power? The commission probably wouldn't even have prepared a proposed map by january2011.

Add a clause that makes it unrepealable like Republicans did with the RTW legislation in Michigan. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Badger on February 16, 2013, 03:28:06 PM
Any reason the gop couldn't have repealed the commission right after taking power? The commission probably wouldn't even have prepared a proposed map by january2011.

Add a clause that makes it unrepealable like Republicans did with the RTW legislation in Michigan. 

Are NC Dems that smart? :P

Re: MI's RTW law, you mean non-repealable by referendum? I can't see any provision saying a law can't be later repealed by legislation passing constitutional muster.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Gass3268 on February 16, 2013, 03:44:14 PM
They also could have changed the redistricting law that would given the Governor the right to veto.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on February 16, 2013, 03:46:47 PM
Any reason the gop couldn't have repealed the commission right after taking power? The commission probably wouldn't even have prepared a proposed map by january2011.

Add a clause that makes it unrepealable like Republicans did with the RTW legislation in Michigan. 

Are NC Dems that smart? :P

Re: MI's RTW law, you mean non-repealable by referendum? I can't see any provision saying a law can't be later repealed by legislation passing constitutional muster.

Well then they could have passed it and then governor Perdue would have vetoed it in 2011-2012.  Then, Democrats probably would have won back a House of the legislature in 2012 and blocked repeal there. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: nclib on February 16, 2013, 08:25:09 PM
Miles, it would be good to see NC county maps with the CD lines superimposed to see the effectiveness of the gerrymander. Wake County in particular looks like a maximum Dem pack in NC-4.

I made this a while back:

()

Thats based on the Congressional vote.

I'm keeping the county-level tallies of the Pres-by-CD maps, so I can do one like that with the Presidential data after I calculate all the districts.

That is good, though I meant a county precinct map of split counties with the outline of the CD borders. BTW, on that map, Forsyth County looks reversed.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 16, 2013, 08:33:50 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 16, 2013, 08:35:28 PM

That is good, though I meant a county precinct map of split counties with the outline of the CD borders. BTW, on that map, Forsyth County looks reversed.

Ah, ok.

Actually, Foxx lost her part of Forsyth county.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: nclib on February 16, 2013, 08:43:12 PM

That is good, though I meant a county precinct map of split counties with the outline of the CD borders. BTW, on that map, Forsyth County looks reversed.

Ah, ok.

Actually, Foxx lost her part of Forsyth county.

And Watt's opponent won inner-city Winston-Salem? (or is that actually red--it's hard to tell esp. given no higher-resolution for that map.)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 16, 2013, 10:11:55 PM

That is good, though I meant a county precinct map of split counties with the outline of the CD borders. BTW, on that map, Forsyth County looks reversed.

Ah, ok.

Actually, Foxx lost her part of Forsyth county.

And Watt's opponent won inner-city Winston-Salem? (or is that actually red--it's hard to tell esp. given no higher-resolution for that map.)

Its the D >90% red.

I probably should have map the map bigger so it would be easier to distinguish.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 17, 2013, 01:01:17 AM
I'm doing some experimenting with GIFs!

This is NC Senate District 2.

Bev Perdue represented it for 10 years. In 2008, she carried it 53/45 against McCrory.

Fast forward 4 years, and Pat McCrory won the district 65/33.

Yikes.

The GIF is between 2008 (which is the one with all the red) and 2012 (which doesn't have much red).

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 17, 2013, 01:30:15 AM
Yeah, this GIF stuff is fun!

This is Mecklenburg County 2008 President vs. 2012 Amendment 1.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on February 17, 2013, 10:34:51 AM
Yeah, this GIF stuff is fun!

This is Mecklenburg County 2008 President vs. 2012 Amendment 1.

()

I am wondering why Republicans didnt just draw Watt a central city Charlotte district that wouldnt even have to leave Mecklenberg county.  It would have still been like 75% Obama, right?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 17, 2013, 11:33:45 AM

I am wondering why Republicans didnt just draw Watt a central city Charlotte district that wouldnt even have to leave Mecklenberg county.  It would have still been like 75% Obama, right?

Such a district would only be about 67% Obama. You'd also have to put his precincts in the Triad somewhere and there are lots of people in southern Charlotte who wouldn't want Watt as their Congressman.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Gass3268 on February 17, 2013, 05:14:05 PM
I would be interested to see what Mecklenburg County would have looked like on Amendment 1 if Obama had came out in favor of gay marriage before the vote. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 17, 2013, 06:10:10 PM
2008/2012 trend vs. Amendment 1.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 18, 2013, 01:37:18 AM
Buchanan County, VA 2000-2012:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Gass3268 on February 18, 2013, 01:39:30 AM

Very cool! I'd love to see a similar map for the NoVa area!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 18, 2013, 01:41:52 AM
Ok.

I want to some WV maps; precinct data there is hard to get, so I figured those old yellow dog counties in western VA would be the closest thing I could do for now.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 18, 2013, 06:45:55 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on February 18, 2013, 07:11:33 PM
Awesome.  Is NOVA possible?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 18, 2013, 07:14:02 PM

Yes, that is coming down the line.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 19, 2013, 01:35:11 AM
I really wonder what those counties in southwestern VA would look like if Hillary were on the ballot.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: smoltchanov on February 19, 2013, 01:48:24 AM
I really wonder what those counties in southwestern VA would look like if Hillary were on the ballot.

I wonder too. Personally - expect hodgepodge. Some counties (especially - after 2010) have, probably, gone Republican irreversibly, but there is no such almost universal "Appalachian hatred" of her, as is in Obama's case. Personally, i don't remember such heavy minority support and such rejection (almost visible hatred) on part of rural and southern whites, as in his case, during last 40 years i monitor US elections. It seems to me even Mondale vote in 1984 was "more balanced"


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 19, 2013, 02:05:23 AM
I really wonder what those counties in southwestern VA would look like if Hillary were on the ballot.

I wonder too. Personally - expect hodgepodge. Some counties (especially - after 2010) have, probably, gone Republican irreversibly, but there is no such almost universal "Appalachian hatred" of her, as is in Obama's case. Personally, i don't remember such heavy minority support and such rejection (almost visible hatred) on part of rural and southern whites, as in his case, during last 40 years i monitor US elections. It seems to me even Mondale vote in 1984 was "more balanced"

Yeah, I agree.

Hillary got over 80% in the primary in most of these counties. She'd be in a pretty strong position if those Democrats stuck with her in the general over the Republican.

What surprised me here was that relatively few people were willing to split there ticket for Kaine. Obama lost those counties 71/28; Kaine did only slightly better, as Allen won them 68/32.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: smoltchanov on February 19, 2013, 02:14:53 AM
Yeah, I agree.

Hillary got over 80% in the primary in most of these counties. She'd be in a pretty strong position if those Democrats stuck with her in the general over the Republican.

What surprised me here was that relatively few people were willing to split there ticket for Kaine. Obama lost those counties 71/28; Kaine did only slightly better, as Allen won them 68/32.

Nationalized Election? Phenomenon, which is quite frequent now. Is there ANY county in Virginia with relatively high difference (say, more then 7-8%) between Obama and Kaine?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 19, 2013, 02:28:47 AM
No; but I guess I underestimated the nationalization/polarization there.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 19, 2013, 05:04:37 PM
NoVA may be harder than I thought. For example, in 2000, Fairfaix County has 206 voting districts; by 2012, it was up to 243.

I'll probably start with 2004 and I'll have to make some educated guesses when filling in the precincts.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on February 19, 2013, 06:18:40 PM
I really wonder what those counties in southwestern VA would look like if Hillary were on the ballot.

I wonder too. Personally - expect hodgepodge. Some counties (especially - after 2010) have, probably, gone Republican irreversibly, but there is no such almost universal "Appalachian hatred" of her, as is in Obama's case. Personally, i don't remember such heavy minority support and such rejection (almost visible hatred) on part of rural and southern whites, as in his case, during last 40 years i monitor US elections. It seems to me even Mondale vote in 1984 was "more balanced"

Yeah, I agree.

Hillary got over 80% in the primary in most of these counties. She'd be in a pretty strong position if those Democrats stuck with her in the general over the Republican.

What surprised me here was that relatively few people were willing to split there ticket for Kaine. Obama lost those counties 71/28; Kaine did only slightly better, as Allen won them 68/32.

If the pro-gun and somewhat pro-life Kaine couldnt do that much better than Obama in those counties, I dont see how Hillary could. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on February 19, 2013, 06:48:23 PM
I really wonder what those counties in southwestern VA would look like if Hillary were on the ballot.

I wonder too. Personally - expect hodgepodge. Some counties (especially - after 2010) have, probably, gone Republican irreversibly, but there is no such almost universal "Appalachian hatred" of her, as is in Obama's case. Personally, i don't remember such heavy minority support and such rejection (almost visible hatred) on part of rural and southern whites, as in his case, during last 40 years i monitor US elections. It seems to me even Mondale vote in 1984 was "more balanced"

Yeah, I agree.

Hillary got over 80% in the primary in most of these counties. She'd be in a pretty strong position if those Democrats stuck with her in the general over the Republican.

What surprised me here was that relatively few people were willing to split there ticket for Kaine. Obama lost those counties 71/28; Kaine did only slightly better, as Allen won them 68/32.

If the pro-gun and somewhat pro-life Kaine couldnt do that much better than Obama in those counties, I dont see how Hillary could. 

Kaine got hurt by being on the same ticket as Obama.  If Hillary were at the top of the ticket I suspect Democrats would do a lot better in Appalachia.

Don't forget how popular the Clinton's were in Appalachia.  In 1996, Buchanan County was Bill Clinton's SECOND BEST county in the entire Commonwealth of Virginia, excluding super-Democratic cities like Richmond and Petersburg.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Skill and Chance on February 20, 2013, 03:25:33 PM
I really wonder what those counties in southwestern VA would look like if Hillary were on the ballot.

I wonder too. Personally - expect hodgepodge. Some counties (especially - after 2010) have, probably, gone Republican irreversibly, but there is no such almost universal "Appalachian hatred" of her, as is in Obama's case. Personally, i don't remember such heavy minority support and such rejection (almost visible hatred) on part of rural and southern whites, as in his case, during last 40 years i monitor US elections. It seems to me even Mondale vote in 1984 was "more balanced"

Yeah, I agree.

Hillary got over 80% in the primary in most of these counties. She'd be in a pretty strong position if those Democrats stuck with her in the general over the Republican.

What surprised me here was that relatively few people were willing to split there ticket for Kaine. Obama lost those counties 71/28; Kaine did only slightly better, as Allen won them 68/32.

If the pro-gun and somewhat pro-life Kaine couldnt do that much better than Obama in those counties, I dont see how Hillary could. 

Kaine got hurt by being on the same ticket as Obama.  If Hillary were at the top of the ticket I suspect Democrats would do a lot better in Appalachia.

Don't forget how popular the Clinton's were in Appalachia.  In 1996, Buchanan County was Bill Clinton's SECOND BEST county in the entire Commonwealth of Virginia, excluding super-Democratic cities like Richmond and Petersburg.

Maybe if Clinton had become president in 2008 these areas would still be voting Dem, but the realignment looks permanent now as long as coal is a national issue.  I don't doubt that Clinton/Warner or Clinton/Schweitzer would do better than Obama there, but it's a different electorate now.  You can't get 1996 back just by running a different candidate.  And Obama has shown that there isn't much need to try anyways...


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 20, 2013, 09:20:52 PM
()

Obama won three of the D >45% precincts (the two in Rockingham and the one in Durham) by exactly 1 vote.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Dave from Michigan on February 20, 2013, 10:49:06 PM
great thread and great maps. how do you make your maps look so professional?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 21, 2013, 12:16:09 AM
great thread and great maps. how do you make your maps look so professional?

Thanks!

Well, I've been working at this for 3 or 4 years now. The programs I use are DRA, SnagIt Editor and Paint.Net for the images and Excel for the data.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 22, 2013, 02:11:54 AM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 22, 2013, 11:53:21 AM
()

Excluding Buncombe County, the district was 64/35 R.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 22, 2013, 12:33:05 PM
()

I had few mistakes in the Congressional map of CD7 that I put out a month ago. When I went back and compared the Presidential map to the original Congressional map, I found a few Obama/Rouzer precincts, which seemed wrong. Here's the amended version:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 22, 2013, 01:03:54 PM
We're gettin' close!

Just a few more districts to geaux.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: nclib on February 22, 2013, 08:07:52 PM
Not a map, but comparing Obama's and McCrory's performances in NC in 2008 and 2012

2008 - best Obama/McCrory and McCain/Perdue gap (half of sum of major party margin)

Obama/McCrory   

Mecklenburg (McCrory's home county)   12.14%   
Union   6.22%   
Orange   5.00%   
Cabarrus   4.90%   
Wake   4.16%   

McCain/Perdue

Tyrrell   20.32%
Columbus   20.13%
Pamlico   18.04%
Martin   17.91%
Jones   17.58%

Obama/McCrory in 2012

Mecklenburg   11.55%
Cabarrus   9.25%
Union   8.11%
Catawba   7.95%
Burke   7.59%

Romney/Dalton

Rutherford (Dalton's home county)   10.06%
Cherokee   4.83%
Columbus   3.65%
Camden   3.51%
Gates   2.90%

Largest swing to McCrory:

Pamlico   23.17%
Tyrrell   22.68%
Carteret   21.00%
Hyde   20.59%
Alleghany   20.28%

Smallest swing to McCrory:

Mecklenburg   0.39%
Durham   0.49%
Rutherford   0.73%
Orange   1.38%
Wake   3.14%

Largest swing towards Obama

Northampton   2.21%
Anson   2.20%
Halifax   2.01%
Robeson   1.82%
Hertford   1.38%
   
Largest swing towards Romney
   
Alleghany   7.35%
Mitchell   4.77%
Ashe   4.71%
Macon   4.47%
Surry   4.36%


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 24, 2013, 02:32:03 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 24, 2013, 02:39:43 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 24, 2013, 02:40:20 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 24, 2013, 02:42:55 PM
And there it is, folks! :D

()


FULL SIZE. (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/82985_ncruchostatewide12.png)

Pres-by-CD calculations by county are coming.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on February 24, 2013, 02:47:54 PM
And there it is, folks! :D

()


FULL SIZE. (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/82985_ncruchostatewide12.png)

Pres-by-CD calculations by county are coming.
Now all you need to do to fulfill that above request (which I'd like to echo!) is to add the CD lines in white.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: smoltchanov on February 24, 2013, 03:24:34 PM

Are you sure that it's NC-12?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 24, 2013, 03:25:27 PM

Ah, I forgot to change the name.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 24, 2013, 09:40:17 PM
With lines distinguishing the CDs:

()

FULL SIZE. (http://http://www.pictureshack.us/images/94688_ncruchostatewide12silver.png)

On deck: the state Congressional vote.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on February 25, 2013, 07:14:41 AM
Thanks, awe-inspiring!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on February 25, 2013, 05:28:20 PM

Good God, I hate this district.  It and NC-04 should be destroyed and turned into something good looking(and less of a Dem vote sink). 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 25, 2013, 08:27:39 PM
This may be a bit random, but I thought it would make a good GIF.

This is NC Senate District 43, which is takes up most of Gaston County, NC.

In 2008, Senator David Hoyle (D) was reelected to a 9th term; despite spending $1 million of his own money, he hung on with 51.5%. Granted, Gaston is hostile to most any Democrat, Hoyle had won by much bigger margins in past years.

By the time 2010 rolled around, Hoyle saw the writing on the wall and called it quits. The Republican he beat in 2008, Kathy Harrington, ran for the open seat and won by 40 points.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Sol on February 25, 2013, 08:39:35 PM
A Democrat won Gaston County?!?!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 25, 2013, 08:46:36 PM

Yep. (http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/David_W._Hoyle) From 1993 to 2011.

Hoyle was mayor of Dallas, NC and could self-fund, so that helped. But still, yeah, Gaston County is rough.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Sol on February 25, 2013, 08:53:56 PM

Yep. (http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/David_W._Hoyle) From 1993 to 2011.

Hoyle was mayor of Dallas, NC and could self-fund, so that helped. But still, yeah, Gaston County is rough.
Maybe It'll swing back in 20+ years with the growth of Charlotte.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on February 25, 2013, 09:12:35 PM

Its really amazing.  That area hasnt had a trace of Democratic since 1976. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 26, 2013, 01:37:57 AM
I needed to make a few tweaks to the 2008 Governor map.

()

FULL SIZE. (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/93534_NCGOVERNOR2008.png)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Chancellor Tanterterg on February 26, 2013, 08:22:06 AM
With lines distinguishing the CDs:

()

FULL SIZE. (http://http://www.pictureshack.us/images/94688_ncruchostatewide12silver.png)

On deck: the state Congressional vote.

Could we please get a county map of this, by any chance?  Thanks :)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 27, 2013, 09:00:05 PM
I was wondering how the old CDs in NC would have voted in 2012. Thus, as usual, I wasted used some perfectly good sleep/study hours to find out!

This is what I came up with:

()

For comparison, this is what 2008 looked like:

()

General comments:

- I know the swing was less than three points, but I was amazed at how similar the maps were; no district changed parties and only 4 districts changed shades.

- Like with 2008, in 2012, CD2 most closely mirrored the country. Ellmers would have been swept out by any decent Democrat.

- Other than CD1, which I was expecting, CD8 also swung Democratic. My explanation: while Cabaurrus and Stanly counties swung R, the counties touching the SC border swung to Obama. Also, on either side of the district, most of the precincts its Charlotte and Fayetteville hands swung to Obama. This is quite tragically ironic, as Kissell would have likely won by double-digits if he had to run in that district again.

- Though CD9 was the most populous district, CD4 would have cast about 35k more votes. From my experience in mapping NC, turnout in the Triangle seems to be noticeably better than that around Charlotte.

- As you can conjecture by looking at a simple county swing map, the biggest part of Obama's slippage came from the mountains. Between CD's 5, 10 and 11, the average swing was 4.9 points towards Romney.

HERE ARE MY COUNTY-LEVEL CALCULATIONS.  (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/20549_2012oldcds.png)

I will say that when I went to add up my CD totals, I was about 9,000 votes short of the statewide total (about 4.5 million). I suspect that most of these are from absentee votes and split precincts. Still, that 9,000 vote gap only accounts for about .002% of all votes cast, so my numbers should be pretty solid.

Feel free to look over my calculations and let me know if you see anything off!

Finally, here are some other maps I got out of this.

The counties with the CDs overlaid:

()

SWING
()

TREND
()

()


On deck:

- NC Pres-by-precinct with county overlay.
- CD totals by county for the new CDs.
- More Louisiana districts.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 01, 2013, 06:22:22 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on March 01, 2013, 07:20:01 PM
I was wondering how the old CDs in NC would have voted in 2012. Thus, as usual, I wasted used some perfectly good sleep/study hours to find out!

This is what I came up with:

()

For comparison, this is what 2008 looked like:

()

General comments:

- I know the swing was less than three points, but I was amazed at how similar the maps were; no district changed parties and only 4 districts changed shades.

- Like with 2008, in 2012, CD2 most closely mirrored the country. Ellmers would have been swept out by any decent Democrat.

- Other than CD1, which I was expecting, CD8 also swung Democratic. My explanation: while Cabaurrus and Stanly counties swung R, the counties touching the SC border swung to Obama. Also, on either side of the district, most of the precincts its Charlotte and Fayetteville hands swung to Obama. This is quite tragically ironic, as Kissell would have likely won by double-digits if he had to run in that district again.

- Though CD9 was the most populous district, CD4 would have cast about 35k more votes. From my experience in mapping NC, turnout in the Triangle seems to be noticeably better than that around Charlotte.

- As you can conjecture by looking at a simple county swing map, the biggest part of Obama's slippage came from the mountains. Between CD's 5, 10 and 11, the average swing was 4.9 points towards Romney.

HERE ARE MY COUNTY-LEVEL CALCULATIONS.  (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/20549_2012oldcds.png)

I will say that when I went to add up my CD totals, I was about 9,000 votes short of the statewide total (about 4.5 million). I suspect that most of these are from absentee votes and split precincts. Still, that 9,000 vote gap only accounts for about .002% of all votes cast, so my numbers should be pretty solid.

Feel free to look over my calculations and let me know if you see anything off!

Finally, here are some other maps I got out of this.

The counties with the CDs overlaid:

()

SWING
()

TREND
()

()


On deck:

- NC Pres-by-precinct with county overlay.
- CD totals by county for the new CDs.
- More Louisiana districts.


Stupid, stupid Democrats for not passing independent redistricting here in summer 2010 when it was clear that they would lose the legislature(all they had to do was read those brutal SUSA polls of the districts to know this).

The map probably would have stayed much like this, but with Kissell losing his parts of Charlotte and gaining more of Union, which only would have shifted the seat a couple points to the right and would have been survivable. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on March 01, 2013, 09:55:28 PM
They should have handed redistricting responsibilities to the Council of State, then we still could've gotten a Democratic gerrymander.

Keep the great maps coming, Miles! :)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: nclib on March 01, 2013, 10:39:04 PM
Under the old NC districts, Obama (2012) ran ahead of gay marriage by:

NC-1   31.4%
NC-10   25.5%
NC-12   22.4%
NC-8   20.8%
NC-2   19.3%
NC-7   16.3%
NC-13   8.0%
NC-11   7.6%
NC-3   5.3%
NC-5   4.8%
NC-9   0.5%
NC-6   -0.1%
NC-4   -4.3%


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 02, 2013, 01:29:32 PM
()

Look at the all the red disappear...


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 02, 2013, 06:23:52 PM
This is NC in normal colors:

()

I like the Atlas colors better.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Gass3268 on March 02, 2013, 06:46:54 PM
This is NC in normal colors:

()

I like the Atlas colors better.

Blasphemy!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 02, 2013, 10:46:34 PM
I used that map for a Wikipedia entry, as most everyone else recognizes the normal colors.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Gass3268 on March 03, 2013, 02:05:23 AM
I used that map for a Wikipedia entry, as most everyone else recognizes the normal colors.

I had a professor last semester that went off for like 5 minutes on how the networks were so stupid to reverse the colors from the world standard. Too bad it will never change back to the way it should. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Chancellor Tanterterg on March 03, 2013, 11:50:01 AM
Could you make a North Carolina 2012 congressional results county map without any county splits.  In other words, Mecklenburg County is split so you'd combine the vote totals of Democratic congressional candidates in Mecklenburg parts of their districts to get the Democratic congressional vote in the county.  Or to be even more clear, how would a county map of North Carolina's congressional vote look if it were in the format of a statewide race map?  Does that make sense?  If you could make such a map, I'd appreciate it :)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 03, 2013, 12:52:08 PM
Could you make a North Carolina 2012 congressional results county map without any county splits.  In other words, Mecklenburg County is split so you'd combine the vote totals of Democratic congressional candidates in Mecklenburg parts of their districts to get the Democratic congressional vote in the county.  Or to be even more clear, how would a county map of North Carolina's congressional vote look if it were in the format of a statewide race map?  Does that make sense?  If you could make such a map, I'd appreciate it :)

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 03, 2013, 12:58:46 PM
Seriously though, I do plan on making a map of the Congressional vote, but I don't think I'm exactly clear on what you're asking, X.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on March 03, 2013, 01:04:42 PM
Seriously though, I do plan on making a map of the Congressional vote, but I don't think I'm exactly clear on what you're asking, X.
Just a county map of the congressional vote, split counties not split.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 03, 2013, 01:13:33 PM
Ah, ok. So  something like this (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=gallery;sa=view&id=3584) but for only NC.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on March 03, 2013, 01:20:24 PM
Ah, ok. So  something like this (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=gallery;sa=view&id=3584) but for only NC.
Although I would prefer a national map! :D


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 03, 2013, 01:25:10 PM
Ah, ok. So  something like this (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=gallery;sa=view&id=3584) but for only NC.
Although I would prefer a national map! :D

Maybe, thought lets start smaller ;)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 04, 2013, 11:26:50 AM
The Congressional vote by county:

()

Kinda odd to see Forsyth a darker shade of red than Guilford; probably has to do with Coble's likability and Foxx's polarization.

DATA (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/34164_CONGDATA.png)

These were the closest counties:

()

Here's a neat little GIF I put together. It compares the maps for President, Congress and the average of the non-Presidential statewide races (which I hammered out right after the election. (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=155525.msg3519747#msg3519747)).

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 04, 2013, 03:09:37 PM
I'm looking for some input from my great readers!

As ya'll have noticed, I'm working on LA Pres-by-CD. After that, I'm trying to decide which LA map to do next. Its going to be either Blanco/Jindal (https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?fips=22&year=2003&f=0&off=5&elect=0) or Obama/Hillary. (https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?fips=22&year=2008&f=0&off=0&elect=1)

Which would ya'll rather me do first?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Obamanation on March 04, 2013, 03:57:44 PM
I'm looking for some input from my great readers!

As ya'll have noticed, I'm working on LA Pres-by-CD. After that, I'm trying to decide which LA map to do next. Its going to be either Blanco/Jindal (https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?fips=22&year=2003&f=0&off=5&elect=0) or Obama/Hillary. (https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?fips=22&year=2008&f=0&off=0&elect=1)

Which would ya'll rather me do first?

Blanco/Jindal


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Gass3268 on March 04, 2013, 10:37:45 PM
Obama/Hillary


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on March 05, 2013, 04:36:14 PM
Blanco/Jindal... also Landrieu/Kennedy


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 05, 2013, 06:02:24 PM
Blanco/Jindal... also Landrieu/Kennedy

Landrieu/Kennedy is the first series of maps in this thread ;)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 05, 2013, 07:08:41 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 07, 2013, 12:12:01 AM
Its about 68/31 Romney between these three:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Napoleon on March 07, 2013, 01:03:14 AM
Obama/Hillary..


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 08, 2013, 12:47:47 PM
I hope to have NC Gov-by-CD out soon.

I hate to keep knockin' poor Dalton, but there really aren't any good ways to spin the results.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 08, 2013, 04:03:34 PM
()
()

Outside of the three safe districts, Dalton didn't crack 40% in any others.

'What 2008 looked like:

()
()


Here's McCrory vs. Romney:

()

This is pretty much what you'd expect.

McCrory overperformed the most in CD9, where he came close to tripling Romney's margin. My precinct, which is in south Charlotte, is a good example of this: 60/38 Romney and 77/21 McCrory.

Mecklenburg County makes up 52% of CD12, and McCrory did 13 points better there than Romney.

McCrory's three worst district compared to Romney were 1, 3 and 7. I guess my best explanation for this is that there was a contingent of eastern voters who didn't want a Governor from Charlotte.  


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 08, 2013, 08:55:41 PM
Dardenne is trying to walk back (http://www.nationaljournal.com/blogs/hotlineoncall/2013/03/dardenne-says-he-s-not-taking-steps-toward-a-senate-bid-07) speculation that he's taking steps towards runnnig.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on March 10, 2013, 02:15:41 AM
Wow.  I didn't realize Perdue won the 7th district.  I think 2012 really was the end of east vs. west politics in North Carolina... forever.  Democrats will have to win by uniting the two.  East vs. west politics in NC dates back to the Colonial era.

And... yes, now I see you did Landrieu vs. Kennedy at the beginning of the thread.  Thank you.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 10, 2013, 03:08:55 AM
Perdue won CD7 by 259 votes; if the Republicans just split or swapped around a few precincts, they could  have easily turned it into a McCrory district. Perdue's win there gave me hope for McIntyre. McIntyre, though, put together a slightly different coalition; he did better than Perdue around Wilmington but fared a tad worse in the northern counties.

Yeah, the east vs. west divide is gradually becoming less the norm with each cycle. NC, like most everywhere else, is becoming more uban vs. rural.

I heard some NC political sci professor a while back say that Perdue would likely be the last Governor from east of I-95 for the foreseeable future. I think I agree; the center of state politics has shifted westward.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on March 10, 2013, 10:24:09 AM
Perdue won CD7 by 259 votes; if the Republicans just split or swapped around a few precincts, they could  have easily turned it into a McCrory district. Perdue's win there gave me hope for McIntyre. McIntyre, though, put together a slightly different coalition; he did better than Perdue around Wilmington but fared a tad worse in the northern counties.

Yeah, the east vs. west divide is gradually becoming less the norm with each cycle. NC, like most everywhere else, is becoming more uban vs. rural.

I heard some NC political sci professor a while back say that Perdue would likely be the last Governor from east of I-95 for the foreseeable future. I think I agree; the center of state politics has shifted westward.

The fact that Perdue won the new third by near double digits makes me think that Democrats could very easily compete for that seat when it comes open in a non-1994/2010 style year.  Its essentially the same district that Marty Lancaster held in the 1980's.  Probably a bit bluer actually. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 11, 2013, 11:02:49 AM
I know, 'shame on me. I took the lazy way out and broke down Orleans Parish by ward instead of voting district. At this point, I just want to get through all the districts so we can get to the state map. I can always go back and redo Orleans Parish by voting district.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on March 11, 2013, 02:07:47 PM
I heard some NC political sci professor a while back say that Perdue would likely be the last Governor from east of I-95 for the foreseeable future. I think I agree; the center of state politics has shifted westward.

I'm thinking Roy Cooper will finally run for Governor in 2020, after McCrory's finished.  Isn't he from Rocky Mount or somewhere east of I-95?  He does want to move up, he's just afraid of running a race in which he's not the clear favorite.

The fact that Perdue won the new third by near double digits makes me think that Democrats could very easily compete for that seat when it comes open in a non-1994/2010 style year.  Its essentially the same district that Marty Lancaster held in the 1980's.  Probably a bit bluer actually. 

I think her big victory in Eastern NC was mostly regional, not party.  She even outperformed Roy Cooper in some counties there.  Counties like Carteret, Onslow, and even Craven Counties are hostile territory for Democrats even on the local level now.  And in the northeast, Currituck is very hostile territory, which is amazing since it was one of the most Democratic counties in the state just thirty years ago.

Still, it's possible that the 3rd could be competitive with a strong campaign from a conservative Democrat.  One possibility is Rep. Paul Tine (D-Outer Banks), I think he may be the only conservative Democrat left in the state legislature from the 3rd CD.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 11, 2013, 02:56:50 PM
I heard some NC political sci professor a while back say that Perdue would likely be the last Governor from east of I-95 for the foreseeable future. I think I agree; the center of state politics has shifted westward.

I'm thinking Roy Cooper will finally run for Governor in 2020, after McCrory's finished.  Isn't he from Rocky Mount or somewhere east of I-95?  He does want to move up, he's just afraid of running a race in which he's not the clear favorite.


Ah, good point.

Quote

I think her big victory in Eastern NC was mostly regional, not party.  She even outperformed Roy Cooper in some counties there.  Counties like Carteret, Onslow, and even Craven Counties are hostile territory for Democrats even on the local level now.  And in the northeast, Currituck is very hostile territory, which is amazing since it was one of the most Democratic counties in the state just thirty years ago.

Still, it's possible that the 3rd could be competitive with a strong campaign from a conservative Democrat.  One possibility is Rep. Paul Tine (D-Outer Banks), I think he may be the only conservative Democrat left in the state legislature from the 3rd CD.

This. Its hard to believe that Onslow County was almost a perfect bellwether for the state in that race. No Democrat other than Perdue would have carried it.

I think Democrats could be competitive in CD3 only in a wave year. In their respective races, Goodwin, Dalton and Atkinson all came within a point or so (http://ncga.state.nc.us/GIS/Download/District_Plans/DB_2011/Congress/Rucho-Lewis_Congress_3/Reports/DistrictStats/SingleDistAdobe/rptDistrictStats-3.pdf) of winning it in 2008 and Wood actually carried it.

The erosion of Democratic support along the east coast has been very severe. This is what the State Senate looked like (http://ncga.state.nc.us/GIS/Download/Maps_Reports/Party_Affiliation_Maps/2003/Interim_Senate_by_Party.pdf) just back in 2004.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on March 11, 2013, 04:14:18 PM
I heard some NC political sci professor a while back say that Perdue would likely be the last Governor from east of I-95 for the foreseeable future. I think I agree; the center of state politics has shifted westward.

I'm thinking Roy Cooper will finally run for Governor in 2020, after McCrory's finished.  Isn't he from Rocky Mount or somewhere east of I-95?  He does want to move up, he's just afraid of running a race in which he's not the clear favorite.


Ah, good point.

Quote

I think her big victory in Eastern NC was mostly regional, not party.  She even outperformed Roy Cooper in some counties there.  Counties like Carteret, Onslow, and even Craven Counties are hostile territory for Democrats even on the local level now.  And in the northeast, Currituck is very hostile territory, which is amazing since it was one of the most Democratic counties in the state just thirty years ago.

Still, it's possible that the 3rd could be competitive with a strong campaign from a conservative Democrat.  One possibility is Rep. Paul Tine (D-Outer Banks), I think he may be the only conservative Democrat left in the state legislature from the 3rd CD.

This. Its hard to believe that Onslow County was almost a perfect bellwether for the state in that race. No Democrat other than Perdue would have carried it.

I think Democrats could be competitive in CD3 only in a wave year. In their respective races, Goodwin, Dalton and Atkinson all came within a point or so (http://ncga.state.nc.us/GIS/Download/District_Plans/DB_2011/Congress/Rucho-Lewis_Congress_3/Reports/DistrictStats/SingleDistAdobe/rptDistrictStats-3.pdf) of winning it in 2008 and Wood actually carried it.

The erosion of Democratic support along the east coast has been very severe. This is what the State Senate looked like (http://ncga.state.nc.us/GIS/Download/Maps_Reports/Party_Affiliation_Maps/2003/Interim_Senate_by_Party.pdf) just back in 2004.

To be fair, isnt that map from before the Dem maps were struck down?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on March 11, 2013, 04:35:12 PM
I think Democrats could be competitive in CD3 only in a wave year. In their respective races, Goodwin, Dalton and Atkinson all came within a point or so (http://ncga.state.nc.us/GIS/Download/District_Plans/DB_2011/Congress/Rucho-Lewis_Congress_3/Reports/DistrictStats/SingleDistAdobe/rptDistrictStats-3.pdf) of winning it in 2008 and Wood actually carried it.

The erosion of Democratic support along the east coast has been very severe. This is what the State Senate looked like (http://ncga.state.nc.us/GIS/Download/Maps_Reports/Party_Affiliation_Maps/2003/Interim_Senate_by_Party.pdf) just back in 2004.

Speaking of which:  It would be cool if you could do a state map (like the Dalton-McCrory CD one) of some other 2012 downballot races.  I'm pretty sure Beth Wood won the 13th district and maybe the 2nd... and it would be interesting to see if any of them came close to winning the 3rd district.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 11, 2013, 05:39:20 PM

To be fair, isnt that map from before the Dem maps were struck down?

Yes, but I don't think the redraw radically affected any eastern coast districts in terms of partisanship.

I which:  It would be cool if you could do a state map (like the Dalton-McCrory CD one) of some other 2012 downballot races.  I'm pretty sure Beth Wood won the 13th district and maybe the 2nd... and it would be interesting to see if any of them came close to winning the 3rd district.


Yeah; I was thinking of at least doing LG, because it was almost exactly 50/50, but I can do a few others.

Wood lost CD12 55/45 in 2008 and she performed worse in 2012. The closest a non-Cooper Democrat came to winning there was Atkinson, who lost 51/49.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 14, 2013, 11:49:06 PM
Lt. Gov-by-CD

I was hoping that Coleman would crack 45% in CDs 3 and 8, but my humble hopes were shattered.


()


It would probably worth going back and calculating how the old CDs would have voted.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 15, 2013, 10:51:19 AM
A few more thoughts on the LG race:

Coleman vs Obama by county:

()

*The Presidential numbers are based on the two-party vote, as their were no third parties running in the LG race; this made for more of an apples-to-apples comparison.

- This is for the most part what I expected. Coleman outperformed the most in the northeast coast and in the southeast. Note Senate District 13 (Robeson and Columbus Counties); Coleman did about 17-18 points better here.

- There almost looks like the Amendment 1 map, as there is an obvious urban rural divide. Despite losing by a greater margin, Obama ran outran Coleman in 4 of the state's 5 largest counties (Cumberland was the largest county were Coleman performed better).

- Obama's overperformance in the urban counties was very slight, less than 3 points for each, but if Coleman had matched him in each, she would have won.

- Which brings me to my next thought: Coleman ran 1.1% behind Obama in her home county, Wake. If she matched him in Wake, I'm pretty sure that that alone would have pushed her over the top.

-Rutherford County looks like something an outlier. It was Dalton's home county, but he still lost it by 12; maybe Dalton actually helped Coleman there.

Coleman vs Obama by CD:

()

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 16, 2013, 10:12:48 AM
How the old districts would have voted:

()

The most pleasant surprise was that Coleman would have actually carried CD7.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on March 16, 2013, 12:12:14 PM
How the old districts would have voted:

()

The most pleasant surprise was that Coleman would have actually carried CD7.

Another reason why I am so mad at Democrats in 2010 for not preparing early on for what was clearly going to happen that year. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 17, 2013, 02:09:33 AM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian. on March 17, 2013, 02:12:30 AM
How the old districts would have voted:

()

The most pleasant surprise was that Coleman would have actually carried CD7.

Another reason why I am so mad at Democrats in 2010 for not preparing early on for what was clearly going to happen that year. 

I'm still mystified by how the North Carolina Republicans even managed to pull that off mathematically.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 17, 2013, 02:48:06 AM

I'm still mystified by how the North Carolina Republicans even managed to pull that off mathematically.

'Ya have to give credit where credit is due. They did a great job.

Its a masterwork of packing. There was a lot of GOP strength locked up in CDs 6, 9 and 10 that was dispersed very well during redistricting.

It helped Republicans that CD1 lost population; that way, they could cram Durham into it, making it even more of a sink.

For the new CD4, it was just a matter of grouping together the most Democratic voters from the old CDs 2, 4 plus some form 8 and 13.

CD12 was also packed more tightly, going from 71% Obama to 78%. It changed in three major ways: 1) Less rural voters; this is why new CD12 is thinner than the old one. 2) In the south, it took additional black voters from CD8's hand into Mecklenburg county. This of course, also helped to push Obama's % down in CD8. 3) Up in Greensboro, it took in the little hand of precincts from the old 13th; these were obviously heavily Democratic.

This is the absolute worst result, IMO:

()

Thats Hagan/Dole. If you were just looking at the map, you'd never guess that the Republican lost by 9 points.

Dole got 26% in CDs 1 and 4 and she didn't crack 20% in CD12 but won all the others 50/46-ish.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on March 17, 2013, 10:01:12 AM

I'm still mystified by how the North Carolina Republicans even managed to pull that off mathematically.

'Ya have to give credit where credit is due. They did a great job.

Its a masterwork of packing. There was a lot of GOP strength locked up in CDs 6, 9 and 10 that was dispersed very well during redistricting.

It helped Republicans that CD1 lost population; that way, they could cram Durham into it, making it even more of a sink.

For the new CD4, it was just a matter of grouping together the most Democratic voters from the old CDs 2, 4 plus some form 8 and 13.

CD12 was also packed more tightly, going from 71% Obama to 78%. It changed in three major ways: 1) Less rural voters; this is why new CD12 is thinner than the old one. 2) In the south, it took additional black voters from CD8's hand into Mecklenburg county. This of course, also helped to push Obama's % down in CD8. 3) Up in Greensboro, it took in the little hand of precincts from the old 13th; these were obviously heavily Democratic.

This is the absolute worst result, IMO:

()

Thats Hagan/Dole. If you were just looking at the map, you'd never guess that the Republican lost by 9 points.

Dole got 26% in CDs 1 and 4 and she didn't crack 20% in CD12 but won all the others 50/46-ish.

It really is a disgusting map.  Not only is it really ugly, but it goes against century plus precedents everywhere.  For example, the fourth was always a strictly Research Triangle district, not something that looks like an Octopus that goes all over the Eastern half of the state.  The seventh always had the Lumbees in it.  The 11th always had Asheville and all of Buncombe county. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Niemeyerite on March 17, 2013, 10:11:48 AM
It's disgusting.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on March 18, 2013, 05:42:57 AM
So was the previous one.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Niemeyerite on March 18, 2013, 07:38:09 AM

I'm not denying it.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on March 18, 2013, 07:38:41 AM
It just needs saying from time to time. :D


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on March 18, 2013, 04:29:25 PM

Nowhere near as bad as this one.  The only really sick thing they did was add that little hub of Charlotte to NC-08. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 18, 2013, 04:58:27 PM

Nowhere near as bad as this one.  The only really sick thing they did was add that little hub of Charlotte to NC-08.  

The touch-point between CDs 6 and 13 was pretty devious as well.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on March 18, 2013, 05:22:01 PM

Nowhere near as bad as this one.  The only really sick thing they did was add that little hub of Charlotte to NC-08.  

The touch-point between CDs 6 and 13 was pretty devious as well.

()


I dont disagree.  Im assuming a fair map would have created a more evenly balanced NC-13 in 2001, probably by making Wake county its own district.  However, by 2008 it would have had a distinct Dem lean. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on March 19, 2013, 04:46:58 PM
^Wow, that's a good point you bring up.  Wake County would have almost perfectly fit its own district in 2000, when the target population was 619,000.  However, by the end of the decade it would have been one of the largest districts in the country and Brad Miller might have gotten thrown out in 2010.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on March 19, 2013, 04:57:56 PM
^Wow, that's a good point you bring up.  Wake County would have almost perfectly fit its own district in 2000, when the target population was 619,000.  However, by the end of the decade it would have been one of the largest districts in the country and Brad Miller might have gotten thrown out in 2010.

Miller would have had a single digit race in 2010, but he almost certainly wouldnt have lost.  Even Elaine Marshall came within a point of carrying that district/Wake county in 2010. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 19, 2013, 05:06:04 PM
Hmm, yeah. Using 2000 numbers, Wake County would have been just 8700 people over the population of a Congressional district; only a precinct or two would need to be removed. The downside for Dems would be that Etheridge would lose his (heavily D) precincts there.

I might do a 2000 Democratic gerrymander with such a Wake district and see how it comes out.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on March 19, 2013, 05:12:36 PM
Hmm, yeah. Using 2000 numbers, Wake County would have been just 8700 people over the population of a Congressional district; only a precinct or two would need to be removed. The downside for Dems would be that Etheridge would lose his (heavily D) precincts there.

I might do a 2000 Democratic gerrymander with such a Wake district and see how it comes out.

Yeah, Etheridge's seat would probably revert back to the way it was from 1992-1996, which was pretty Republicans and getting more so with the growth of Johnston county.  Also, the 4th would have dropped the Republican leaning parts of the county and raised the Demo percentage further there. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 22, 2013, 10:46:48 AM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 22, 2013, 12:43:29 PM

I might do a 2000 Democratic gerrymander with such a Wake district and see how it comes out.

Yeah, Etheridge's seat would probably revert back to the way it was from 1992-1996, which was pretty Republicans and getting more so with the growth of Johnston county.  Also, the 4th would have dropped the Republican leaning parts of the county and raised the Demo percentage further there. 

I drew a map for this over here. (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=156282.msg3664854#msg3664854)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 22, 2013, 11:37:02 PM
As props to Blanco for calling out Jindal (http://www.wafb.com/story/21724622/former-la-governor-publicly-criticizes-jindal) this past week, I've decided to do the 2003 Governor map next.

I've broken down how the CDs would have voted:

()

Whats funny in this map is that (other than CD2) districts 4 and 6 were the most Democratic at the federal level; Blanco's performance in both 4 and 6 was actually worse than her state margin.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: smoltchanov on March 23, 2013, 01:56:32 PM
As props to Blanco for calling out Jindal (http://www.wafb.com/story/21724622/former-la-governor-publicly-criticizes-jindal) this past week, I've decided to do the 2003 Governor map next.

I've broken down how the CDs would have voted:

()

Whats funny in this map is that (other than CD2) districts 4 and 6 were the most Democratic at the federal level; Blanco's performance in both 4 and 6 was actually worse than her state margin.

If i remember correctly - Blanco ran that year as a rather "old school" Cajun Democrat (and rather conservative one), while Jindal - as a sort of "urban conservative reformer". In addition - Democratic ad, showing Jindal even mre dark-skinned that he really is, worked fairly well in rural Louisiana - Blanco won many conservative rural parishes, which Democrats seldom win.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 24, 2013, 01:44:23 PM

If i remember correctly - Blanco ran that year as a rather "old school" Cajun Democrat (and rather conservative one), while Jindal - as a sort of "urban conservative reformer". In addition - Democratic ad, showing Jindal even mre dark-skinned that he really is, worked fairly well in rural Louisiana - Blanco won many conservative rural parishes, which Democrats seldom win.


Exactly. One of Jindal's slogans (which he repeated alot later when Obama was running in 2008), was that in Louisiana, the Republicans are the party of change. Jindal even got Ray Nagin's endorsement.

Out of Obama's 5 worst parishes in 2012 (Cameron, LaSalle, Livingston, Grant and West Carroll) Blanco carried all of them except Livingston pretty comfortably.



Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on March 24, 2013, 01:49:15 PM

If i remember correctly - Blanco ran that year as a rather "old school" Cajun Democrat (and rather conservative one), while Jindal - as a sort of "urban conservative reformer". In addition - Democratic ad, showing Jindal even mre dark-skinned that he really is, worked fairly well in rural Louisiana - Blanco won many conservative rural parishes, which Democrats seldom win.


Exactly. One of Jindal's slogans (which he repeated alot later when Obama was running in 2008), was that in Louisiana, the Republicans are the party of change. Jindal even got Ray Nagin's endorsement.
And Kathleen Blanco enacted her revenge for that when Katrina hit.

That was truly a gun-to-your-head, escape-to-Nunavut election. Rare to have those be actually competitive.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 24, 2013, 01:50:24 PM
Well ya'll, I have to make a few minor changes, like Olreans Parish, but this is basically it!

()

FULL SIZE. (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/779_lafinalpres12v2.png)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: smoltchanov on March 24, 2013, 11:06:36 PM
It seems to me that substantial number of black-majority precincts along the river still somehow managed to vote Romney . How is it possible? Or am i wrong?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: smoltchanov on March 25, 2013, 02:05:13 AM

If i remember correctly - Blanco ran that year as a rather "old school" Cajun Democrat (and rather conservative one), while Jindal - as a sort of "urban conservative reformer". In addition - Democratic ad, showing Jindal even mre dark-skinned that he really is, worked fairly well in rural Louisiana - Blanco won many conservative rural parishes, which Democrats seldom win.


Exactly. One of Jindal's slogans (which he repeated alot later when Obama was running in 2008), was that in Louisiana, the Republicans are the party of change. Jindal even got Ray Nagin's endorsement.

Out of Obama's 5 worst parishes in 2012 (Cameron, LaSalle, Livingston, Grant and West Carroll) Blanco carried all of them except Livingston pretty comfortably.




Again, if i am correct - there is a big difference between Livingston and other four. Livingston is a suburban and rather upscale parish, full of rather well-to-do managerial types, who doesn't have a "nobless oblige" symptoms  (and sympathy to less successful people then they are) of their coastal counterparts (being, frequently, well-to-do only in first generation), while other four are relatively sparsely populated rural parishes. It's difficult to imagine to me - which sort of Democrat can win any of these parishes (only - extremely conservative (BTW - if you know such people - inform me, you know - i like the mavericks)), with Obama getting between 11% and 19% there. Of course - compared to local candidates Obama underperformed severely in these parishes, but still - ....


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on March 25, 2013, 01:10:55 PM

If i remember correctly - Blanco ran that year as a rather "old school" Cajun Democrat (and rather conservative one), while Jindal - as a sort of "urban conservative reformer". In addition - Democratic ad, showing Jindal even mre dark-skinned that he really is, worked fairly well in rural Louisiana - Blanco won many conservative rural parishes, which Democrats seldom win.


Exactly. One of Jindal's slogans (which he repeated alot later when Obama was running in 2008), was that in Louisiana, the Republicans are the party of change. Jindal even got Ray Nagin's endorsement.

Out of Obama's 5 worst parishes in 2012 (Cameron, LaSalle, Livingston, Grant and West Carroll) Blanco carried all of them except Livingston pretty comfortably.




Again, if i am correct - there is a big difference between Livingston and other four. Livingston is a suburban and rather upscale parish, full of rather well-to-do managerial types, who doesn't have a "nobless oblige" symptoms  (and sympathy to less successful people then they are) of their coastal counterparts (being, frequently, well-to-do only in first generation)
Suburban - exurban, with a population almost doubled over the past twenty years. But not exactly upscale. Richer than the places we're comparing it with here, richer than the state as a whole, but a lot poorer than Saint Tammany. And incredibly White by Southern standards and fairly uniform - unusually small difference between mean and median income (mean income is not that far above the state average actually), with the highest income brackets (200k+ households) underrepresented compared to the state as a whole.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: smoltchanov on March 25, 2013, 02:13:39 PM

If i remember correctly - Blanco ran that year as a rather "old school" Cajun Democrat (and rather conservative one), while Jindal - as a sort of "urban conservative reformer". In addition - Democratic ad, showing Jindal even mre dark-skinned that he really is, worked fairly well in rural Louisiana - Blanco won many conservative rural parishes, which Democrats seldom win.


Exactly. One of Jindal's slogans (which he repeated alot later when Obama was running in 2008), was that in Louisiana, the Republicans are the party of change. Jindal even got Ray Nagin's endorsement.

Out of Obama's 5 worst parishes in 2012 (Cameron, LaSalle, Livingston, Grant and West Carroll) Blanco carried all of them except Livingston pretty comfortably.




Again, if i am correct - there is a big difference between Livingston and other four. Livingston is a suburban and rather upscale parish, full of rather well-to-do managerial types, who doesn't have a "nobless oblige" symptoms  (and sympathy to less successful people then they are) of their coastal counterparts (being, frequently, well-to-do only in first generation)
Suburban - exurban, with a population almost doubled over the past twenty years. But not exactly upscale. Richer than the places we're comparing it with here, richer than the state as a whole, but a lot poorer than Saint Tammany. And incredibly White by Southern standards and fairly uniform - unusually small difference between mean and median income (mean income is not that far above the state average actually), with the highest income brackets (200k+ households) underrepresented compared to the state as a whole.

Thanks for correction! Neverthelless - such areas usually vote rather in uniform way: in this case heavily Republican.. Probably - less so because of race then rural parishes, but more so - because of general economic and social positions..


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 27, 2013, 02:02:21 AM
2012 President vs. Governor in Mecklenburg County.

Its pretty obvious which is which:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 27, 2013, 02:36:13 PM
Yikes....

My personal views aside, Dalton was a good candidate and had a much better resume than this result would indicate.

()

FULL SIZE. (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/81684_mccrorystate.png)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on March 28, 2013, 05:39:42 PM
Eeeek.  Patty Mac even won inside I-277.

It looks like the very few Romney-Dalton precincts are in Rutherford County.  I don't think Obama won any precincts in Rutherford County, but Dalton won a few around Rutherfordton and Forest City.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 28, 2013, 07:13:32 PM
McCrory vs. Romney in Mecklenburg County

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 29, 2013, 08:18:54 PM
While I'm on this topic, here are a few more maps.

I broke McCrory/Romney in Mecklenburg & Wake counties down by CD.

()
()

I used different color scales for the counties, so the maps aren't exactly consistent. The reason for this was that McCrory's range of overperformance was much wider in Mecklenburg, as you'd expect. There, he ran anywhere between 6 and 41 points ahead of his Presidential ticket. In Wake, he range was much more limited, ranging from 4 to 16 points.

'Looking at Mecklenburg first. The voters that were least willing to split their ballots were the Democrats in the CD12 portion of the county. Notice the contrast among the precincts in the inner border between CDs 9 and 12.
In the CD9 section of Mecklenburg, McCrory performed 27 points better than Romney, winning 65-33 as opposed to 52/47.
McCrory lost the CD12 precincts 74/24, but still 17 points better than Romney's 83-16 loss.
Finally, only three precincts from CD8 were still left in the county, which McCrory fared 19 points better than Romney (losing them 59/40 as opposed to 69/31).

For Wake county, the apex of McCrory's overperformance was, well, around Apex, Cary and along the western edge of the county. As such, McCrory ran the furthest ahead in the CD2 part of the county. Those precincts actually voted 52/47 for Obama but 53/44 for McCrory.
The consistency between CD4 and CD12 was pretty interesting. In both those areas, McCrory outpaced Romney by about 11 points.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 29, 2013, 09:16:22 PM
On the other side of the spectrum, I wanted to find an area where Romney ran ahead of McCrory. The first place that came to mind was NC Senate District 13, consisting of Robeson and Columbus counties (I had a shapefile of this on hand, so it worked out well). State Democrats here always outperform the Presidential ticket.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on March 29, 2013, 11:26:38 PM
Because I was bored I decided to map out the results of the 2012 Attorney General election in NC.  Roy Cooper won every county... or did he?  Comparing his actual vote totals to the total number of votes cast in the Secretary of State election (similar downballot status), you can see which counties had high percentages, and in some cases, majorities of voters not voting.  Unfortunately I'm not Paint-savvy so I only have one shade of red and blue on this map.

()

"Not Voting" Counties:

60% Avery
57% Mitchell
56% Randolph
56% Clay
55% Carteret
53% Lincoln
52% Stokes
52% Alexander
51% Yadkin
51% Wilkes
50% Moore

Ironically, Cooper won Moore County in 2008.

Cooper best counties (over 80%):

84% Warren
83% Durham
82% Halifax
82% Northampton
81% Hertford
81% Edgecombe
81% Robeson
80% Anson

Biggest improvements over Obama:

63% Allegheny (+32%)
60% Surry (+29%)
75% Tyrrell (+28%)
73% Columbus (+27%)
60% Rutherford (+27%)

And in case you were curious:

50% Currituck
51% Cherokee
52% Union
54% Gaston
56% Davidson
60% Brunswick
64% New Hanover
66% Alamance
66% Buncombe
68% Forsyth
70% Wake
71% Guilford
71% Mecklenburg
71% Nash
79% Orange

If you didn't support Cooper, it was very easy to simply abstain, skip, or "not vote" however Cooper probably did get many votes because he was the only name on the ballot.  If he had an actual Republican opponent, my guess is he would have gotten around 56-57% of the vote.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 30, 2013, 01:32:33 AM
Good idea.

I did the shades for Cooper's vote vs. the number of President votes cast, but I can do SoS as well.

()

DATA. (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/38042_agvepres.png)

Cooper would have fallen below 50% in 16 counties:

Caldwell   49.92%
Macon   49.69%
Cherokee   48.03%
Moore   47.97%
Currituck   47.60%
Wilkes   46.91%
Yadkin   46.79%
Alexander   46.73%
Stokes   46.65%
Graham   46.24%
Lincoln   45.55%
Carteret   43.95%
Clay   42.50%
Randolph   42.23%
Mitchell   38.97%
Avery   36.49%

After those, he was under 51% in three other counties:

Davie   50.97%
Henderson   50.72%
Union   50.58%

As I was filling out the map, I fully expected him to fall under 50% in Union, but that would have been the next one to flip.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 30, 2013, 02:07:16 AM
Cooper vs. the total SoS votes.

'The same map/calculations that you did, psychicpanda, but with the shading intervals.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on March 30, 2013, 09:57:49 AM
Nice.  Yes, it's shocking that anybody with (DEM) next to their name was able to win over a majority of Union County voters, no matter the circumstances.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on March 30, 2013, 09:59:53 AM
No One could be worse than a Democrat - any Democrat - huh?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on March 30, 2013, 10:02:33 AM
I have a request!

Swing map by precinct of coastal Louisiana (South of the mississippi - ie St Bernard to Cameron. Actually, to St Mary would probably be quite enough.)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 30, 2013, 11:33:01 AM
I have a request!

Swing map by precinct of coastal Louisiana (South of the mississippi - ie St Bernard to Cameron. Actually, to St Mary would probably be quite enough.)

Ok. I'll start with that next!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 31, 2013, 12:34:39 AM
Here's an interesting bit of history. I was digging around in archives and this is the original map in 1991 that the Democrats were pushing for before they had to draw CD12 in its current serpentine iteration.

()

The new 12th district, gained after the 1990 census, was originally set to be a Republican sink the upper Piedmont.

It looks like they were trying to salvage their hold on CD5 even as that area was trending away from them. It keeps all of Forsyth and Watauga and reaches down into the Piedmont to grab a few Democratic towns.

CD9 would have been most all of Meckleburg and Lincoln counties. Today, this would probably be Lean D, but back then Mecklenburg was swingy. Even as late as 2002, it voted for Liddy Dole and Bush even cleared 50% there in 2000. This CD9 still would have been at least Lean R throughout the 1990's with Myrick.

CD6 contained all of Guilford county, which would seem good for Democrats today, but like Mecklenburg, Guilford was swingy at the federal level up until recently. Coble was (is) quite popular and well entrenched, so I think he would have held this seat throughout the 1990's as well.

The only seats that would have certainly elected Democrats throughout the decade (excluding 1994) would be 1, 2, 4 and 7.

CD3 would have fallen permanently with Jones in 1994 and in 1998, Robin Hayes would have still still flipped CD8 when Bill Hefner retired.

I guess, in retrospect, it actually helped Democrats that CD12 was ultimately drawn the way it was because it gave them at least one seat in the western part of the state.

Despite the ugliness of this map, only 9 actual precincts were split.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on March 31, 2013, 07:05:59 PM
Here's an interesting bit of history. I was digging around in archives and this is the original map in 1991 that the Democrats were pushing for before they had to draw CD12 in its current serpentine iteration.

()

The new 12th district, gained after the 1990 census, was originally set to be a Republican sink the upper Piedmont.

It looks like they were trying to salvage their hold on CD5 even as that area was trending away from them. It keeps all of Forsyth and Watauga and reaches down into the Piedmont to grab a few Democratic towns.

CD9 would have been most all of Meckleburg and Lincoln counties. Today, this would probably be Lean D, but back then Mecklenburg was swingy. Even as late as 2002, it voted for Liddy Dole and Bush even cleared 50% there in 2000. This CD9 still would have been at least Lean R throughout the 1990's with Myrick.

CD6 contained all of Guilford county, which would seem good for Democrats today, but like Mecklenburg, Guilford was swingy at the federal level up until recently. Coble was (is) quite popular and well entrenched, so I think he would have held this seat throughout the 1990's as well.

The only seats that would have certainly elected Democrats throughout the decade (excluding 1994) would be 1, 2, 4 and 7.

CD3 would have fallen permanently with Jones in 1994 and in 1998, Robin Hayes would have still still flipped CD8 when Bill Hefner retired.

I guess, in retrospect, it actually helped Democrats that CD12 was ultimately drawn the way it was because it gave them at least one seat in the western part of the state.

Despite the ugliness of this map, only 9 actual precincts were split.


Can you figure 1988 and 1992 Presidential results for these districts?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 31, 2013, 08:11:20 PM
Can you figure 1988 and 1992 Presidential results for these districts?

Lol, you don't have to quote the whole thing for things like this. I'll know what you're talking about ;)

I'll try. I'll see what else I can dig up :)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 31, 2013, 08:43:49 PM
Hmm, there doesn't seem to be precinct-level data on the website for 1988 or 1992 :P


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on March 31, 2013, 09:01:52 PM
Here's an interesting bit of history. I was digging around in archives and this is the original map in 1991 that the Democrats were pushing for before they had to draw CD12 in its current serpentine iteration.

()

The new 12th district, gained after the 1990 census, was originally set to be a Republican sink the upper Piedmont.

It looks like they were trying to salvage their hold on CD5 even as that area was trending away from them. It keeps all of Forsyth and Watauga and reaches down into the Piedmont to grab a few Democratic towns.

CD9 would have been most all of Meckleburg and Lincoln counties. Today, this would probably be Lean D, but back then Mecklenburg was swingy. Even as late as 2002, it voted for Liddy Dole and Bush even cleared 50% there in 2000. This CD9 still would have been at least Lean R throughout the 1990's with Myrick.

CD6 contained all of Guilford county, which would seem good for Democrats today, but like Mecklenburg, Guilford was swingy at the federal level up until recently. Coble was (is) quite popular and well entrenched, so I think he would have held this seat throughout the 1990's as well.

The only seats that would have certainly elected Democrats throughout the decade (excluding 1994) would be 1, 2, 4 and 7.

CD3 would have fallen permanently with Jones in 1994 and in 1998, Robin Hayes would have still still flipped CD8 when Bill Hefner retired.

I guess, in retrospect, it actually helped Democrats that CD12 was ultimately drawn the way it was because it gave them at least one seat in the western part of the state.

Despite the ugliness of this map, only 9 actual precincts were split.


Kind of dumb how Democrats didn't also concede the 9th here as they did in their actual map in order to make the 8th safe by adding the most Dem parts of Charlotte and giving much of Union and Cabarrus to the 9th.  That way, they would have had five districts at the end of the decade and possibly even six if they had recruited a better candidate to take back the 5th in 1996 in a district that likely voted for Clinton in 1992.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on April 01, 2013, 01:26:33 PM
The swing for Terrebonne and Lafourche Parishes.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on April 02, 2013, 11:23:53 AM
Thanks!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on April 02, 2013, 10:31:47 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on April 04, 2013, 04:27:46 PM
Here's an interesting bit of history. I was digging around in archives and this is the original map in 1991 that the Democrats were pushing for before they had to draw CD12 in its current serpentine iteration.

()

The new 12th district, gained after the 1990 census, was originally set to be a Republican sink the upper Piedmont.

It looks like they were trying to salvage their hold on CD5 even as that area was trending away from them. It keeps all of Forsyth and Watauga and reaches down into the Piedmont to grab a few Democratic towns.

CD9 would have been most all of Meckleburg and Lincoln counties. Today, this would probably be Lean D, but back then Mecklenburg was swingy. Even as late as 2002, it voted for Liddy Dole and Bush even cleared 50% there in 2000. This CD9 still would have been at least Lean R throughout the 1990's with Myrick.

CD6 contained all of Guilford county, which would seem good for Democrats today, but like Mecklenburg, Guilford was swingy at the federal level up until recently. Coble was (is) quite popular and well entrenched, so I think he would have held this seat throughout the 1990's as well.

The only seats that would have certainly elected Democrats throughout the decade (excluding 1994) would be 1, 2, 4 and 7.

CD3 would have fallen permanently with Jones in 1994 and in 1998, Robin Hayes would have still still flipped CD8 when Bill Hefner retired.

I guess, in retrospect, it actually helped Democrats that CD12 was ultimately drawn the way it was because it gave them at least one seat in the western part of the state.

Despite the ugliness of this map, only 9 actual precincts were split.


If you could tell me which counties are which and in which districts they are in, I could actually try and estimate Presidential numbers in these districts. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on April 05, 2013, 05:08:29 PM
My first map from a northern state ! :D

I probably won't do many, as Homely does an excellent job of covering NY, but I was really interested in this race.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Fuzzybigfoot on April 05, 2013, 05:12:16 PM
Awesome!  :)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Incipimus iterum on April 05, 2013, 05:14:42 PM
Good job :)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Niemeyerite on April 05, 2013, 06:45:15 PM
Beautiful job, ugly map... Hochul was such a great Congresswoman...


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on April 06, 2013, 03:37:19 PM
Like I did with WV a few months ago, here is the Congressional history of NC; this is the last century's worth of elections. For some of the maps, I consulted Fuzzy's maps (hat tip to him) and Ourcampaigns.com. I just wanted to put all these maps into a standardized set.


FULL SIZE. (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/6938_nctempli.png)

()

Please tell me if you see any mistakes!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on April 06, 2013, 03:46:22 PM
I also made this set to go with the one in my last post. These are NC's Congressional maps grouped by decade. The number under them correspond to the first election cycle that they were used for.

A few things:

- There was no redistricting for the 1922 or 1952 cycles.

- There were some mid-decade changes in the 1960s and 1990s.

FULL SIZE. (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/69867_NVMAPFRAME.png)

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on April 07, 2013, 01:57:39 PM
Great job!  Wow, pretty crazy that a district stretching from Mecklenburg to Mitchell and Avery Counties was once a Republican vote sink.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on April 07, 2013, 02:57:00 PM
Great job!  Wow, pretty crazy that a district stretching from Mecklenburg to Mitchell and Avery Counties was once a Republican vote sink.

In the earlier decades, the Democrats did a good job of diluting the Republican strength in the west. The western Democrats were routinely reelected wit less than 60%.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on April 10, 2013, 08:03:20 PM
An assortment of State Senate districts I randomly felt like doing:


()

()

()

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on April 13, 2013, 01:22:18 PM
McIntyre vs. Obama

()

Columbus County is really in a category of its own here. Obama lost it 53/46 but McIntyre won it 65/35. In fact in Obama's worst precinct there was 85/14 Romney; McIntyre carried that precinct, though by a single vote.

New Hanover County was more uniform than I expected. I expected McIntyre overperformnace to be the most pronouced near the southern part of the county. Instead, he ran a consistent 20-ish points ahead of Obama throughout the county.

As you would expect, Johnston County, where Rouzer is from, is pretty low on the crossover spectrum. Even within Johnston, the closer you got to the Wake County suburbs, the less voters were willing to split their ballots.

Finally, Obama actually performed better in one precinct in Hoke County. It was heavily black, IIRC, and they each got at least 97%. Still, I'd like to meet those Obama/Rouzer voters so I can slap them silly.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: windjammer on April 13, 2013, 01:31:42 PM
You're doing a great job Miles. Congratulations!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on April 13, 2013, 09:37:26 PM
^I think the votes in Hoke County were probably undervotes, voting for Obama but then skipping the rest of the ballot.

Raleigh beltway politics is very interesting... if you thought the biggest swings between Obama performance and downballot Democratic performance were in rural eastern NC you would be wrong.  Raleigh had some crazy swings... this is precinct 1-11 which is a super-rich Country Club Republican precinct off of Glenwood Ave.

71/28 Mitt Romney (R-President)
75/23 Pat McCrory (R-Governor)
65/35 Beth Wood (D-Auditor)!
83/17 Steve Troxler (R-Agriculture)!
54/46 June Atkinson (D-Superintendent)
53/47 Janet Cowell (D-Treasurer)

Even this super Republican, urban precinct voted to keep some of the Democratic Constitutional Officers.  Beth Wood's performance compared to Obama's is a 73 point swing!  Debra Goldman had serious problems, if the rest of the state's media had covered them like Raleigh's media did, Wood would have had a landslide win across the state.  Even my precinct in Wilmington, which only voted 53/46 for Romney, gave Goldman a win.

And it was the flipside in some super-Democratic Raleigh precincts - while voting heavily for Obama and even giving Walter Dalton a pretty big win, they voted to keep Steve Troxler and Cherie Berry in office.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on April 14, 2013, 04:56:50 AM
Pretty map. I like.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on April 14, 2013, 05:49:15 PM

71/28 Mitt Romney (R-President)
75/23 Pat McCrory (R-Governor)
65/35 Beth Wood (D-Auditor)!
83/17 Steve Troxler (R-Agriculture)!
54/46 June Atkinson (D-Superintendent)
53/47 Janet Cowell (D-Treasurer)


No kidding.

The Lenoir County hand of CD7 was 71/28 Romney voted 51/47 for Perdue in 2008. I think McIntyre could improve his % there in going forward.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on April 16, 2013, 05:53:23 PM
The swing in the south from 2004 to 2012.

()

Of the 1373 counties, 54% of them swung to Romney. Romney's best was Knott, KY, which swung 75.2% towards him. Obama's best was Webb, TX, which swung 39.8% Democratic.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on April 19, 2013, 12:03:52 AM
Kissell vs. Obama

()

As you would expect, the further into the Piedmont you got, the less voters were willing to distinguish Kissell from Obama.

Kissell ran the furthest ahead in his homebase of Montegomery County, which is ordinarily slightly Republican-leaning by statewide standards. Sadly, only 4% of the districts votes came from there.

I was expecting Obama to perform better in a few Richmond County precincts because that dumb Demcorat who was running as write-in was from there. I didn't realized that while Kissell and Obama each got 50-51% in Richmond, Hudson only got 38% compared to Romney's 48%.

There are about 5 precincts oddly split in Union County that are relatively small; I just left those blank.

That one blue precinct in Robeson County kinda bugs me.

Finally though Hudson was from Concord, he failed to outrun Romney in any of the Cabarrus County precincts, reflecting his semi-carpetbagger status. Kissell, by contrast, has always lived in CD8.

Finally, on a bit of a personal note, while I was doing some research, I found that Hudson and I graduated from the same high school. Its kidna cool to have someone from my high school in Congress, but it sucks that it was at the expense of one of my favorite Congressmen.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on April 19, 2013, 03:55:26 AM
Pretty deep blue, too. Something wrong with the result possibly.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on April 19, 2013, 09:42:34 AM
Pretty deep blue, too. Something wrong with the result possibly.

I double-checked that precinct and its seems to be right, though it cast more Congressional votes than Presidential votes, which is unusual.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on May 05, 2013, 04:45:50 PM
These are the first in a series of maps I did the other day looking at PVI by county. Instead of using the national vote as a starting point, I calculated the PVI of each county compared to the state result. And, since this is PVI, I used data from 2012 as well as 2008.

Here's the Presidential PVIs per county:

()

The Presidential vote between 2008 and 2012 was 50.4/49.6 Republican.

Obama's best county was Durham, which was D+27. After that, Hertford and Orange were tied at D+22.

Yadkin was the most Republican at the Presidential level, R+24. Randolph, Avery and Mitchell were all R+23.

Obama lost Lenoir County both times but it still had a slightly D PVI.

These are the PVIs for non-Presidential statewide races (this would be compatible to the D/R Averages in DRA). For this, I crunched 18 races between 2008 and 2012: Gov., LG, Auditor, Ag. Commissioner, Insurance Commissioner, Labor Commissioner, SoS, Superintendent of Public Instruction and Treasurer. For the sake of symmetry, I excluded AG in 2008.

()

Overall, the average vote was 51.6/48.4 in favor of Democrats.

I guess the first thing I noticed is that Democratic strength is less intense, but more dispersed.

As I expected, the county that changed the most between the two maps was Columbus. There was a 29-point gap between the state average, 60.5/39.5 Democratic, and Obama's performance, he lost it 54/46 both times. This made its Presidential PVI R+4 but for state races, it was D+9.

Obama improved the most in Mecklenburg County; D+12 Presidentially but only D+8 on average. In Durham, Wake and Orange he also performed at least 3 points better than the average.

In GIF form:

()

'Should be pretty easy to tell which is which.

()
 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on May 07, 2013, 04:42:09 PM
I was looking at some old NC political maps today ('60s, '70s, '80s).  Here are some interesting things I discovered about NC politics:

The most shocking thing I found was Durham County voting for Jesse Helms in 1978.

Jesse Helms did very well in eastern NC.  He significantly overperformed Mitt Romney's performance in eastern NC (except on the coast).  That sort of goes against conventional wisdom that rural, eastern NC is trending Republican.

Terry Sanford's gubernatorial and senate elections best exemplify the eastern vs. western NC split in politics.

I can't find any election since 1960 in which Orange or Northampton Counties voted Republican.  They even voted for George McGovern in 1972.  Likewise, I can't find any election in which Avery or Mitchell Counties voted Democrat.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on May 07, 2013, 05:17:30 PM
The most shocking thing I found was Durham County voting for Jesse Helms in 1978.


No kidding.

Quote
Terry Sanford's gubernatorial and senate elections best exemplify the eastern vs. western NC split in politics.

Yeah. There were a few outliers though, as Sanford won Union County in 1986, which would be unheard of today.
Quote
I can't find any election since 1960 in which Orange or Northampton Counties voted Republican.  They even voted for George McGovern in 1972.  Likewise, I can't find any election in which Avery or Mitchell Counties voted Democrat.

For Orange, you have to go back to 1928!

I don't think Avery/Mitchell have ever voted Democratic. Those two belong over the boarder in eastern TN.

One county that always stuck out at me was Sampson. Its swingy today in statewide races, but going back in Presidential elections from the 1920's until the 1950's it was always considerably less D than the rest of eastern NC.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on May 07, 2013, 05:29:54 PM
The Parishes of LA

2008- 2012 PVIs

()

Since I didn't have a 'state average' to compare this to, I did calculations for the 2000-2004 PVIs.

()

Back then, the parish the state's two-party vote was 55.6/44.4 R and went up to 59/41 in 2008/2012.

'Hard to believe that Calcasieu and Allen parish were slightly Democratic when compared to the rest of the state. Acadiana was much 'swingier' back then.

The first map is more polarized, as you would expect. Orleans Parish, for instance, went from D+34 to D+40.



Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on May 07, 2013, 05:38:28 PM
The GIF for LA:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on May 07, 2013, 10:39:13 PM
Ah! I forgot to post data for LA. Oh well, I'll have that out soon.

I'd like to do the SC-01 election next :D


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on May 11, 2013, 02:50:45 PM
The most shocking thing I found was Durham County voting for Jesse Helms in 1978.


No kidding.

Quote
Terry Sanford's gubernatorial and senate elections best exemplify the eastern vs. western NC split in politics.

Yeah. There were a few outliers though, as Sanford won Union County in 1986, which would be unheard of today.
Quote
I can't find any election since 1960 in which Orange or Northampton Counties voted Republican.  They even voted for George McGovern in 1972.  Likewise, I can't find any election in which Avery or Mitchell Counties voted Democrat.

For Orange, you have to go back to 1928!

I don't think Avery/Mitchell have ever voted Democratic. Those two belong over the boarder in eastern TN.

One county that always stuck out at me was Sampson. Its swingy today in statewide races, but going back in Presidential elections from the 1920's until the 1950's it was always considerably less D than the rest of eastern NC.

Sanford actually narrowly lost Union in 1986 and also Johnston, while solidly losing Mecklenberg.  Crazy. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: old timey villain on May 11, 2013, 02:58:54 PM
Awesome NC maps.

It always baffles me how a lot of the mountain counties are so moderate while the Georgia mountain counties just a few miles south are so very Republican.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on May 11, 2013, 03:03:20 PM
Awesome NC maps.

It always baffles me how a lot of the mountain counties are so moderate while the Georgia mountain counties just a few miles south are so very Republican.

:D

Yeah, the three mountain counties at the very tip of NC (Cherokee, Clay, Graham) are all pretty Republican by state standards (65%-ish R average) but even they're not as R as those in northern GA. The big exceptions, as I've said are Avery and Mitchell; they were both about 75% Romney and belong in eastern TN.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on May 11, 2013, 03:13:47 PM
There is, of course, a mountain in the way.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on May 12, 2013, 04:17:46 PM
Swain County has a significant Native American population and Jackson County has Western Carolina University, as well as some Native Americans, which would explain those counties being so moderate.  Haywood County has the Great Smoky Mountains National Park which is run by the federal government, and I assume brings a lot of jobs to the area.  Madison and Yancey Counties, I have no idea... I actually have relatives in Yancey County and they're all Democrats but I don't know why.  It probably dates back to the civil war.

North Georgia was solidly Democratic locally until the 1990s, when everyone changed parties.  People like Zell Miller and Nathan Deal (former Dem) are from that area.  Northern Mississippi and Northern Alabama used to be bases for conservative Democrats in those states.  It's not like Eastern Tenn. or southeastern Ky. which has been Republican forever.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on May 12, 2013, 06:17:26 PM
Swain County has a significant Native American population and Jackson County has Western Carolina University, as well as some Native Americans, which would explain those counties being so moderate.  Haywood County has the Great Smoky Mountains National Park which is run by the federal government, and I assume brings a lot of jobs to the area.  Madison and Yancey Counties, I have no idea... I actually have relatives in Yancey County and they're all Democrats but I don't know why.  It probably dates back to the civil war.

North Georgia was solidly Democratic locally until the 1990s, when everyone changed parties.  People like Zell Miller and Nathan Deal (former Dem) are from that area.  Northern Mississippi and Northern Alabama used to be bases for conservative Democrats in those states.  It's not like Eastern Tenn. or southeastern Ky. which has been Republican forever.

Its hard to believe that North Georgia remained Democratic even locally past the late 1960's.  There is almost no black population there like there is in Northern Mississippi and Northern Alabama. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Sol on May 12, 2013, 09:35:56 PM
My understanding is that Democratic strength in many Western NC counties comes from the TVA, although I'm not sure. There's also a significant population of hippie types in a lot of those mountain areas.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on May 12, 2013, 11:24:30 PM
^Only in Asheville and Boone, and to a very small extent, Brevard and Tryon.  Most mountain counties gave Amendment One (gay marriage ban) more than 70% of the vote.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: 🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸 on May 15, 2013, 05:48:36 PM
^Only in Asheville and Boone, and to a very small extent, Brevard and Tryon.  Most mountain counties gave Amendment One (gay marriage ban) more than 70% of the vote.

There are some hippie types in Henderson County as well.  Nice little hemp enthusiast store on main street Hendersonville, right next to the arthouse cinema and the fairy sculpture shop.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on May 18, 2013, 11:06:25 PM
Going along with my swing map, here is the trend map for the south from 2004 to 2012.

()

The swing from Kerry 2004 to Obama 2012 was 6.3 points, so the swing map was adjusted to reflect that.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on June 06, 2013, 05:02:40 PM
The swing from 2004 to 2012 for the entire country:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on June 10, 2013, 07:39:42 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Fuzzybigfoot on June 10, 2013, 08:24:14 PM
Wasn't Boucher favored, even just before the election or something?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on June 10, 2013, 08:34:45 PM
Yeah, Nate Silver even had Boucher winning.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on June 13, 2013, 05:43:35 PM
This is the voter turnout shift from 2008 to 2012. Yellow counties cast more votes in 2012 than 2008 while turnout fell in the purple counties.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on June 13, 2013, 08:44:33 PM
Some people theorized the leftward shift in many southern counties was due to fewer evangelicals turning out for Romney, but it appears as though there was actually a rise in black turnout.  Surprising.

Miles, do you know which states had the largest increases and dropoffs in turnout?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on June 13, 2013, 10:24:27 PM
Miles, do you know which states had the largest increases and dropoffs in turnout?

On the state level, Dave Wasserman kept a spreadsheet of raw turnout (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjYj9mXElO_QdHpla01oWE1jOFZRbnhJZkZpVFNKeVE#gid=19), which was helpful; I just took that idea and applied it to the counties.

Biggest increases:

DC: +10.5%
CO: +7.0%
UT: +6.8%
NV: +4.9%
NC: +4.5%

Steepest drops:

OK: -8.7%
VT: -7.9%
NY: -7.5%
KS: -6.1%
WV: -6.0%

My favorite is NH, which cast two more votes in 2012 than 2008.

I was surprised that parts of central Appalachia cast more votes in 2012; I just thought lots of Democrats that didn't like Obama stayed home.

Also, the increase in western ND makes Heitkamp's win even more impressive.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Sol on June 13, 2013, 10:33:51 PM
I was surprised that parts of central Appalachia cast more votes in 2012; I just thought lots of Democrats that didn't like Obama stayed home.
I suppose the most definite conclusion that can be taken out of the 2012 election is that the Democratic Party's traditional manifestation in Appalachia is as dead as a doornail. I suspect that Elliott County will fall by 2016/2020, and the long death will be complete. KY and WV should have republican state legislatures within the the next 10 years or so, if not sooner.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on June 22, 2013, 10:36:26 PM
()

FULL SIZE. (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/97539_nc2sw.png)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Seattle on June 23, 2013, 04:27:35 PM
What's up with the huge swing in that one western/Tennessee border precinct?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on June 23, 2013, 05:33:18 PM
What's up with the huge swing in that one western/Tennessee border precinct?

Very few votes (less than 25) were cast in the precinct during either election.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Brittain33 on June 23, 2013, 06:41:52 PM
I was surprised that parts of central Appalachia cast more votes in 2012; I just thought lots of Democrats that didn't like Obama stayed home.

Must have been a switch from Dems staying home in 2008 to actively voting against Obama because of coal.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on June 25, 2013, 07:28:52 PM
This was one of the (increasingly rare) races where Wake was more Democratic than Mecklenburg, mostly due to Goldman's tumultuous tenure on the Wake County School Board.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on June 26, 2013, 08:17:13 PM
I've been sitting on this map for a few weeks now and just getting around to posting it.

2004-2012 Trend

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: windjammer on June 27, 2013, 05:05:20 PM
As the expert of redistricting of this forum, do you think you would manage to delete most of the majority minority districts in South Carolina, Alabama, Louisiana, Georgia and Texas?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on June 27, 2013, 05:11:49 PM
As the expert of redistricting of this forum, do you think you would manage to delete most of the majority minority districts in South Carolina, Alabama, Louisiana, Georgia and Texas?

Delete them? How so?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: windjammer on June 27, 2013, 05:13:53 PM
Because the Voting Rights Act was partially declared invalid, so I suppose the republicans can delete the majority minority district now?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on June 27, 2013, 05:17:17 PM
Because the Voting Rights Act was partially declared invalid, so I suppose the republicans can delete the majority minority district now?

No, as that would violate Section II.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: windjammer on June 27, 2013, 05:19:03 PM
Thank you! So what does it change?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on June 27, 2013, 05:21:17 PM

The states aren't obligated to send their draft maps to the DOJ for preclearance.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on June 27, 2013, 05:22:59 PM
Because the Voting Rights Act was partially declared invalid, so I suppose the republicans can delete the majority minority district now?

No, as that would violate Section II.

And additionally, Republicans like those majority minority districts because they keep minority voters out of what would be marginal adjacent districts.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on June 30, 2013, 12:49:41 PM
A PPP poll this week had Democrats leading the generic legislative ballot by seven points, and that got me thinking.  By how much would Dems have to win the generic ballot to flip one of the chambers (the Senate looks closer).

The Republicans really did do a good job with their gerrymander, however there are a lot of seats that might not be as Republican as they look on paper.  Take the 2012 Secretary of State race which Elaine Marshall (D) won 53.8-46.2, or 7.5 points - by my estimation she won several Republican-held Senate districts:

- Meridith (Cumberland)
- Goolsby (New Hanover)
- Rabin (Lee/Harnett/Johnston)
- Barefoot (Wake/Franklin)
- Hunt (Wake)

Then there are a couple of other Senate districts where she probably came pretty close to winning:

- Barringer (Wake)
- Jackson (Johnston/Sampson/Duplin)

Now consider a few more districts Marshall did not come close to winning but are winnable for Democrats on the state legislative level:

- Cook (Beaufort/Hyde/Dare/Currituck/Camden/Pasquotank/Perquimans/Gates)
- Davis (Cherokee/Clay/Graham/Macon/Swain/Jackson/Haywood)
- Newton (Nash/Wilson/Johnston)
- Hise (Rutherford/Polk/McDowell/Mitchell/Yancey/Madison)

Democrats would need to win nine seats to take control.  That seems like a tall order, something more reachable would be winning four seats to break the GOP's veto-proof majority in the Senate.  Then Pat McCrory would be forced to take ownership of what they pass.  In hindsight it would have been really helpful if Coleman could have eeked out a win in the Lt. Gov. race.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on June 30, 2013, 01:39:47 PM
A PPP poll this week had Democrats leading the generic legislative ballot by seven points, and that got me thinking.  By how much would Dems have to win the generic ballot to flip one of the chambers (the Senate looks closer).

The Republicans really did do a good job with their gerrymander, however there are a lot of seats that might not be as Republican as they look on paper.  Take the 2012 Secretary of State race which Elaine Marshall (D) won 53.8-46.2, or 7.5 points - by my estimation she won several Republican-held Senate districts:

- Meridith (Cumberland)
- Goolsby (New Hanover)
- Rabin (Lee/Harnett/Johnston)
- Barefoot (Wake/Franklin)
- Hunt (Wake)

Then there are a couple of other Senate districts where she probably came pretty close to winning:

- Barringer (Wake)
- Jackson (Johnston/Sampson/Duplin)

Now consider a few more districts Marshall did not come close to winning but are winnable for Democrats on the state legislative level:

- Cook (Beaufort/Hyde/Dare/Currituck/Camden/Pasquotank/Perquimans/Gates)
- Davis (Cherokee/Clay/Graham/Macon/Swain/Jackson/Haywood)
- Newton (Nash/Wilson/Johnston)
- Hise (Rutherford/Polk/McDowell/Mitchell/Yancey/Madison)

Democrats would need to win nine seats to take control.  That seems like a tall order, something more reachable would be winning four seats to break the GOP's veto-proof majority in the Senate.  Then Pat McCrory would be forced to take ownership of what they pass.  In hindsight it would have been really helpful if Coleman could have eeked out a win in the Lt. Gov. race.

By looking at the seats, it would seem that Merideth(Cumberland county) should be pretty low hanging fruit.  It's almost impossible to draw a seat wholly in that county that's any worse for Democrats than a toss up.  The New Hanover and Wake county seats should also be very good opportunities as the latter only continues to get more Dem. 

Those other seats that touch Johnston county and include a lot of fast trending GOP areas seem like a bridge too far.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on June 30, 2013, 08:25:14 PM
Those other seats that touch Johnston county and include a lot of fast trending GOP areas seem like a bridge too far.

That's true but Republican Ronald Rabin only won the Lee/Harnett/Johnston seat 51-49 despite his name rhyming with Republican Jesus.  He underperformed Mitt Romney very badly so Dems should definitely target that seat in 2014.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on June 30, 2013, 08:39:09 PM
Those other seats that touch Johnston county and include a lot of fast trending GOP areas seem like a bridge too far.

That's true but Republican Ronald Rabin only won the Lee/Harnett/Johnston seat 51-49 despite his name rhyming with Republican Jesus.  He underperformed Mitt Romney very badly so Dems should definitely target that seat in 2014.

I think for that district a Presidential electorate would be needed, but it should at least be on watch.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on July 01, 2013, 07:13:45 AM
Those other seats that touch Johnston county and include a lot of fast trending GOP areas seem like a bridge too far.

That's true but Republican Ronald Rabin only won the Lee/Harnett/Johnston seat 51-49 despite his name rhyming with Republican Jesus.  He underperformed Mitt Romney very badly so Dems should definitely target that seat in 2014.

I think for that district a Presidential electorate would be needed, but it should at least be on watch.

I would think that a district with Johnson county would be better for Dems in an off year.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 12, 2013, 11:27:10 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 17, 2013, 09:39:03 AM
Some exciting news! Today I was at Senator Hagan's office for breakfast. I thought it would be neat if I printed up a copy of my 2008 Senate map to bring to her. I brought three copies; I gave one to Senator Hagan and she signed the other two for me!

()

Yes, I had to flip the colors, as the Atlas scheme would have confused her!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JerryArkansas on July 17, 2013, 02:33:55 PM
Some exciting news! Today I was at Senator Hagan's office for breakfast. I thought it would be neat if I printed up a copy of my 2008 Senate map to bring to her. I brought three copies; I gave one to Senator Hagan and she signed the other two for me!

()

Yes, I had to flip the colors, as the Atlas scheme would have confused her!
That's awsome Miles :), wish I could meet her and other senators.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 17, 2013, 02:41:01 PM
That's awsome Miles :), wish I could meet her and other senators.

I passed by Mark Pryor's office when I was walking around. It was a neat trip. I stopped in and saw David Vitter and then Kay Hagan. When I was walking around the Hart building, I saw Al Franken and Mark Kirk talking with their of consituents.

I'm trying to schedule a meeting with Mary Landrieu...I met with her two years ago, but I never got the pic from it :P


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JerryArkansas on July 17, 2013, 02:49:47 PM
That's awsome Miles :), wish I could meet her and other senators.

I passed by Mark Pryor's office when I was walking around. It was a neat trip. I stopped in and saw David Vitter and then Kay Hagan. When I was walking around the Hart building, I saw Al Franken and Mark Kirk talking with their of consituents.

I'm trying to schedule a meeting with Mary Landrieu...I met with her two years ago, but I never got the pic from it :P
In the Summer of 2015 when i go to Washington,  I'm going to try and get a meeting with both arkansas senators, Claire, and a few others that I really like.  My dream is to meet dianne Feinstein


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: minionofmidas on July 18, 2013, 10:13:48 AM
The lovechild of Tom Hagen and Kay Corleone should have been able to deal with Atlas colours. :P


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 18, 2013, 04:26:27 PM
Senator Hagan when I showed her the map:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JerryArkansas on July 18, 2013, 04:27:34 PM
Senator Hagan when I showed her the map:

()
I love her face in that pic.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 30, 2013, 08:36:25 PM
County-level PVIs for 2008/2012:

()

EVEN Counties:

Granville, NC
Jefferson, AL
Racine, WI
Porter, IN
Calhoun, MI


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 31, 2013, 04:10:24 PM
I met with another Senator today ;)


()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: windjammer on July 31, 2013, 04:12:12 PM
Congratulations! :p
How is she in real life?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 31, 2013, 04:14:21 PM
She's awesome. I actually met with her two years ago and I stopped back. I asked her if she'd come speak with us College Democrats down at LSU and she said yes :D


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: windjammer on July 31, 2013, 04:19:31 PM
Well, I suppose you have photos with her? :p


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 31, 2013, 04:31:37 PM

Yeah, they'll be up soon :)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 31, 2013, 04:35:42 PM
Also, when I showed Landrieu the map, she said the exact same thing as Hagan: "We need to put more blue on that map!"


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: homelycooking on July 31, 2013, 04:39:19 PM
Cartographic leadership? Undoubtedly. But I don't think the honorable Senator was referring to that. ;)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: windjammer on July 31, 2013, 04:40:02 PM
Honestly, I'm confident about Landrieu. I expect her improving her margins!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 01, 2013, 11:40:40 PM
I'm still waiting on the pics from Mary, but at the College Democrats convention, I happened to run into my buddy Tim Kaine! Regrettably, I didn't have a map on hand to give him!

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on August 02, 2013, 01:36:14 AM
Tim Kaine is a great guy.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 05, 2013, 10:06:49 PM
2004/2008 PVI by County

()

Here's how the EVEN counties shifted between the 2004/2008 and 2008/2012 cycles:

Larimer CO: EVEN -> D
Granville NC: R -> EVEN
Jefferson AL: R -> EVEN
Chester PA: EVEN -> R
Sumter GA: EVEN -> D
Grant MN: EVEN -> R
Hill MT: EVEN-> D
Menominee MI: EVEN-> R
Delta MI: EVEN -> R
Racine WI: R -> EVEN
Porter IN: R -> EVEN
Calhoun MI: D-> EVEN
St. Genevieve MO: D -> EVEN

Major counties flipping from R to D :

San Diego CA
San Bernadino CA
San Joaquin CA
Hillsborough FL
Jefferson CO
Forsyth NC
Pitt NC
Loudoun VA
DuPage IL
Kane IL

Major counties flipping from D to R:

Jefferson TX
Madison IL
Bucks PA
Suffolk NY
Volusia FL
Stark OH
Montgomery OH


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 06, 2013, 02:34:12 PM
And here we are!

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 14, 2013, 12:29:19 AM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 15, 2013, 12:41:38 AM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 15, 2013, 10:44:10 AM
This is Wake County in 2012. Overall, Obama carried the county by 55,666 votes. However, with the voters who cast ballots only on election day, he lost by 8 votes.

Would any supporters of the NC voter suppression bill care to defend its cuts to early voting?

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 12, 2013, 08:50:00 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: 🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸 on September 12, 2013, 09:17:29 PM
County-level PVIs for 2008/2012:

()

EVEN Counties:

Granville, NC
Jefferson, AL
Racine, WI
Porter, IN
Calhoun, MI


Iowa's borders with NE and MO are striking, and much more pronounced than 04/08.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 13, 2013, 12:36:13 AM

Iowa's borders with NE and MO are striking, and much more pronounced than 04/08.

Yeah the IA line is weird; no other state borders have that much of a contrast. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 13, 2013, 12:45:21 AM
I'm experimenting with a new color scheme. I tested it out with these strength maps.

Obama

()

Romney

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Smid on September 13, 2013, 01:13:53 AM
These are all great maps! Loving the more detailed colour schemes!

The turnout one should be "fewer" votes instead of "less" votes, though, I think (I don't know the precise grammar rule, but I believe fewer is used when referring to something that can be counted... such as the number of votes).


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 13, 2013, 03:31:18 PM
I've settled on a color scheme (slightly different that the one above with NC), but I think the shades of green will always been harder to distguish than their red and blue equivalent. An example of the greens:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 14, 2013, 01:13:02 AM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 14, 2013, 12:17:13 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 21, 2013, 09:06:06 PM
Some credit to Smid here, as I used his enlarged version of my map. This is the swing from 2004 to 2012 by CD:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on September 21, 2013, 09:18:57 PM
The trend map to go with my last map:

()

15 quickest D-trending seats (other than the Hawaii districts):

CA-46 (Sanchez)
GA-13 (Scott)
CA-41 (Takano)
CA-51 (Vargas)
FL-09 (Grayson)
TX-28 (Cueller)
CA-21 (Valadao)
TX-34 (Vela)
CA-35 (McLeod)
AZ-07 (Pastor)
CA-06 (Matsui)
CA-16 (Costa)
NJ-08 (Sires)
TX-15 (Hinojosa)
FL-27 (Ros-Lethenin)

15 quickest R-trending seats:

KY-05 (Rogers)
WV-03 (Rahall)
AR-01 (Crawford)
AR-04 (Cotton)
TN-06 (Black)
OK-02 (Mullin)
AL-04 (Aderholt)
TX-36 (Stockman)
TX-04 (Hall)
TN-04 (DesJarlaias)
LA-03 (Boustany)
WV-01 (McKinley)
TN-07 (Blackburn)
TN-01 (Roe)
AZ-04 (Gosar)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JerryArkansas on December 09, 2013, 04:34:43 PM
Miles, could you do a map of the 2010 House races in Arkansas 1st, 2nd, and 4th/


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 09, 2013, 09:03:21 PM
I kinda have some other stuff in line atm and I'm still trying to find an AR map with updated precinct shapefiles. I'll put it on the list though!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 12, 2013, 04:08:07 AM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Sol on December 12, 2013, 07:16:31 PM
wow, McIntyre's overperformance in New Hanover and Cumberland is shocking.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 12, 2013, 08:47:39 PM
Actually, compared to his districtwide margin, he underpeformed in a lot of New Hanover County. There were quite a few precincts, especially in the south, where he did worse than the in the district as whole in 2008, but still went on to carry them in 2012.

He's always looked out for Fort Bragg, so that partially explains Cumberland County.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 15, 2013, 03:36:20 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on December 16, 2013, 07:04:46 PM
Any way you could post a close up of the Triangle area?  It's hard to believe how much more Republican that area was back then.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr. Illini on December 16, 2013, 07:15:44 PM
County-level PVIs for 2008/2012:

()

EVEN Counties:

Granville, NC
Jefferson, AL
Racine, WI
Porter, IN
Calhoun, MI


Iowa's borders with NE and MO are striking, and much more pronounced than 04/08.

This, and although they aren't quite as stark, the IL/MO border is very noticeable as well, despite southern Illinois being considered by us up here to be very Republican.

1) It disproves the whole "southern IL is basically Missouri culturally" (even I am guilty of saying it).
2) I guess everything is relative for Chicagoans, considering southern IL to be very Republican when it looks liberal next to Missouri.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 16, 2013, 11:12:30 PM
Any way you could post a close up of the Triangle area?  It's hard to believe how much more Republican that area was back then.

Did you try right-clicking?

Here's a GIF of 2002 and 2008. Some precincts were divided/consolidated in the interim, but ya'll get the idea.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Badger on December 17, 2013, 01:54:04 AM

Wow, The Professor was wrong: Spending time making election maps CAN help you meet girls!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on December 17, 2013, 05:21:40 AM
Any way you could post a close up of the Triangle area?  It's hard to believe how much more Republican that area was back then.

Did you try right-clicking?

Well, I have a Mac, so...

Thanks, though.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 17, 2013, 07:59:32 AM
Well, I have a Mac, so...

Thanks, though.

Ah, sorry; I'm Mac illiterate!

Anyway, yeah. The urban swings were just brutal for Dole. Mecklenburg, Wake, Guilford and Cumberland counties all swung 25 points against here. A 2002-2008 Senate precinct swing map might be worth doing down the line :D


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 17, 2013, 08:35:15 AM

Wow, The Professor was wrong: Spending time making election maps CAN help you meet girls!

I gave both Landrieu and Hagan maps; their staffers probably pitched them after I left! haha.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 17, 2013, 11:11:21 AM
Charlotte and the Triad:

()

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 21, 2013, 10:14:53 AM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 21, 2013, 11:16:57 AM
Any specific requests for NC maps from the last decade or so?

I'm doing 2004 President next. I'll probably do 2004 Governor then, so that I'll have maps for all the Gubernatorial races since 2000.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: windjammer on December 21, 2013, 11:19:34 AM
You're always doing a great job Miles :D


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 22, 2013, 09:20:10 PM
Well, lets consider this my Christmas present to the forum! :D

NC Bush/Kerry with CD lines/breakdowns.

()

FULL SIZE. (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/44493_BUSHKERRY04NC.png)

Let me know if you see any mistakes.

One of the best things about this site is that we're lucky to have some top notch cartographers; ya'll always make me want to do my best work!

As usual, I'm excited to see what we come up with next year!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Adam Griffin on December 22, 2013, 09:26:45 PM
Beautiful! Great job.

Also, this has to be the most Atlas photo I've ever seen. (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=155525.msg3800722#msg3800722)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: nclib on December 22, 2013, 09:34:50 PM
Miles, I'd be interested in seeing a 2012 Obama/Romney/Amendment One map. (i.e. red = Obama, pro-gay, pink = Obama, anti-gay, etc.) I actually started this myself before my computer crashed.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on December 31, 2013, 02:59:35 AM
I posted a diary over at DKE about the white vote in North Carolina.... http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/12/31/1266189/-Examining-the-White-Vote-pt-1-North-Carolina

I used your outline for my congressional map, Miles, hope ya don't mind.

Non-atlas colors, sorry. :)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 31, 2013, 03:19:30 AM
Wow, it came out good, psychicpanda! Great!

It would be interesting to contrast the Presidential white vote with the white vote in a state race, LG, for example.

I've been meaning to do a diary on DKE for a whole, but my plans for it always kinda get swept under the rug.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on December 31, 2013, 03:47:11 AM
Thanks!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 04, 2014, 03:42:15 AM
Obama performed pretty well in the LA capitol area in 2012.

Going into the election, I thought Obama would hold onto East Baton Rouge parish, but with less than 50%; it was a nice surprise that he improved over 2008! Actually, 2012 was the first time since 1952 that EBR parish was more Democratic than the national vote.

McCain carried this quartet of parishes 57.6/41.1. Romney slid to 56.5/41.8.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 04, 2014, 02:24:15 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 08, 2014, 05:53:47 PM
nclib's suggestion for 2012 Pres vs. Amendment 1.

()

FULL SIZE. (http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3683/11844152555_94ef3d245a_o.png)

I made a few similar maps a while ago, mostly of the urban areas, but I changed up the color scheme a bit for this one.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 08, 2014, 08:22:45 PM
The swing map for Jefferson Parish from 2008-2012:

()

Without that big swamp precinct:

()

My feeling here is that, as opposed to Baton Rouge which had higher turnout, lots of conservatives stayed home; turnout in Jefferson was down about 5-6K votes from 2008 to 2012. I was expecting Metairie and Kenner, the heavily R parts in the north, to be less elastic.

Many Republicans here are socons, so I guess some were less than enamored with Romney.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 09, 2014, 12:32:05 AM
The swing in NC from 2004 to 2008.

()

FULL SIZE. (http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3812/11849523036_b72bf40409_o.png)

I was about 85% done with this when I realized that the data I got for this from the General Assembly site didn't allocate the absentee votes by precinct. I know it will likely produce very minor differences, but at some point soon, I'd like to go back and recalculate the results with absentees factored in.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 15, 2014, 11:58:08 AM
Well, I know what my next map will be; I'll probably finish the 2011 LG map.

Jay Dardenne will probably be coming to my LA government class at some point this semester. We wouldn't him not to have a map to sign!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JerryArkansas on January 15, 2014, 07:26:08 PM
I got bored today, so I decided to map a make of the primary election Mary Landrieu was in in 1996.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 15, 2014, 07:32:52 PM
Thanks!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 16, 2014, 02:36:44 AM
'Rounding out my series on Jefferson Parish, the trend:

()

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 22, 2014, 02:29:27 AM
This is going to be part of a larger post eventually, but here's Blanco 03 vs Kerry 04:

()
()


I had to modify my usual 3% scale and it still wasn't enough. In some of those parishes in LA-05, Blanco was running 75%+ better than Kerry.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 25, 2014, 01:29:37 AM
Landrieu 2002 and Blanco 2003 both win by about 4 points; their coalitions were more different that I expected.

()

()

()

Landrieu put together more of a typical 'Presidential' coalition; she ran ahead of Gore/Kerry in CD1 and 22 points better than Blanco in CD2. Landrieu narrowly lost the the other rural districts. I'm actually surprised Terrell carried CD7. Laffayette Parish went 59-41 for Terrell so that did it.

Jindal held Blanco to only 68% in CD2 while even Kerry was getting 75%.

The coalitions that Blanco/Landrieu put together really remind me of Perdue/Hagan. I guess running for non-federal office helped Blanco/Perdue in the rural areas while their opponents were from urban areas.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: RedSLC on January 25, 2014, 01:42:32 AM
This is going to be part of a larger post eventually, but here's Blanco 03 vs Kerry 04:

()
()


I had to modify my usual 3% scale and it still wasn't enough. In some of those parishes in LA-05, Blanco was running 75%+ better than Kerry.

Wow. Why did Blanco run so badly behind Kerry in New Orleans, even while over-performing in pretty much every other part of the state?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 25, 2014, 01:54:00 AM
Wow. Why did Blanco run so badly behind Kerry in New Orleans, even while over-performing in pretty much every other part of the state?

Jindal was from New Orleans area and was elected to succeed Vitter to represent CD1 in 2004. Jindal cast himself as reformer, and had much more crossover appeal in the area, while Blanco ran as more an old school Democrat.

The only thing I remember firsthand about that election: My mom, a liberal Republican, complained that they elected the "old Cajun grandma" instead of Jindal.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 26, 2014, 02:49:32 AM
'03 Gov under the current lines:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 26, 2014, 07:18:44 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 28, 2014, 03:38:46 AM
2008 by CD:

()


I was expecting her margin in CD6 to be wider, but Livingston Parish is rough.

As for best overperformance, CDs 1 and 3 are tied; she ran 34 better than Obama in each.

CD1
Obama: -47
Landrieu: -13

CD3
Obama: -24
Landrieu: +10


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 30, 2014, 01:18:50 AM
Basically my last three Senate-by-CD races put into one:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 06, 2014, 05:07:24 AM
2004:

()

Vitter win outright in large part because he nationalized the hell out of the race. Chris John was a Democrat from Acadia Parish who represented CD7. John Kennedy was (is) the state Treasurer who switched parties to run against Landrieu in 2008.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 06, 2014, 01:46:11 PM
After running a close but unsuccessful bid for Majority Leader, Bennett Johnston was up for reelection in 1990. In running for a leadership post, he had to necessarily veer to the left. With that, some state legislator from Metairie named David Duke ran and won a majority of the white vote.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 22, 2014, 11:28:29 PM
This was a fun race to break down:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 27, 2014, 02:24:18 AM
Small change to Johnston/Duke. I forgot Rapides parish was split between CDs 5 and 8, not just in 5. Anyway, it pushes Duke over 50% in CD5.

FWIW, Duke got 56%-ish of the white vote.


()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on March 29, 2014, 03:37:03 PM
The 1991 Primary.

Crunching the numbers for Cleo Fields' district was so darn tedious.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: International Brotherhood of Bernard on March 29, 2014, 03:42:36 PM
The 1991 Primary.

Crunching the numbers for Cleo Fields' district was so darn tedious.

()
Good lord, that district is an abomination.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on April 07, 2014, 03:28:59 AM
This is one of my new favorites:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on April 10, 2014, 12:02:13 AM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Skill and Chance on April 10, 2014, 12:54:25 AM
If Landrieu won very narrowly in a runoff this cycle, would you expect her to only carry LA-02?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on April 10, 2014, 01:02:45 AM
^ Very possible. CD4 would be next, but its 2 points more Republican than the rest of the state:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on April 11, 2014, 07:00:36 AM
I'm pretty sure this is the most fractured race I've ever done.

I was actually expecting Landrieu to carry CD2. She got in the runoff because she got the most 2nd place finishes.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on April 12, 2014, 08:59:38 AM
Going off the last map of the 1996 Senate race, I combined the Republican and Democratic votes in the primary and then compared that to the runoff. Landrieu was very lucky that the runoff was held concurrently with the Presidential election (back then, the primaries were in September or October).

In the 1996 primary, Republicans candidates collectively got 56% of the two-party vote. Comparing the partisan numbers primary to the runoff might not be exactly apples to apples, as the jungle primary emphasizes candidates over parties. Still, Landrieu was lucky to be on the ballot with Clinton for the runoff.

Here's the breakdown by parish. The first map is the two-party primary vote, then the actual Landrieu/Jenkins runoff, then the swing:

()

61 out of the 64 parishes got more Democratic. Calcasieu (Lake Charles) and Cameron Parishes swung Republican. The Democrat that Landrieu narrowly beat in the primary, Richard Ieyoub was from Lake Charles, so his home-region effect didn't translate over to Landrieu. Ieyoub was very popular there; he served as Calcasieu Parish DA and then went on to serve as the AG.

West Baton Rouge Parish also swung slightly R. My guess is that there are a lot working-class whites there that would have reacted better to Ieyoub than Landrieu. Ieyoub was very much in the tradition of the Longs, while Landrieu was seen as more of a modern Democrat. Jenkins was (is) also from around Baton Rouge, so that may have helped.

Next, here's the breakdown by CD. Again, the first map is the primary two-party vote. Though this was 1996, this map turned out to be a good preview of how the CDs would go on to vote in the 2000's. For instance, other than CD1, CD5 was the first district to give a Republican over 60% (Bush in 2004).

The second map is the runoff and then the swing.

()

Finally, I did looked at the turnout. Overall, the turnout jump from the September primary to the November runoff was 38.4%, or about 500K votes. Higher turnout in urban parishes helped Landrieu. Still, there wasn't really an overwhelming correlation between increased turnout and partisan swing. For example, the turnout spiked around Shreveport but CD4 only swung 10% to Landrieu (less than the statewide swing). Also, while the parishes around Alexandria all swung markedly D, their turnout was fairly static.

Caldwell Parish was the only parish to cast less votes in the runoff. Its a very small, rural parish (population 10K), so that's likely why. David Duke always did well there (even carrying it in the primary), so perhaps election enthusiasm there decreased with him off the ballot.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on April 12, 2014, 12:27:10 PM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on April 23, 2014, 09:43:43 PM
Kinda boring, but here's how the old CDs would have voted in 2012:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on April 26, 2014, 10:11:52 AM
DKE has this race crunched under the current lines but I wanted to do the old ones too:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on May 02, 2014, 05:44:14 PM
Despite being a good year for Democrats, 1986 was one of the better pickup opportunities the GOP had in LA during the twentieth century. Russell Long (considered the best Senator in the state's history) was retiring.

Republicans had a top-tier recruit in Hensen Moore, who had rep'd CD6 for several terms. Democrats fielded a few candidates, the strongest being John Breaux who was rep'ing CD7 and was an Edwards ally.

The also-rans for the Democrats were Sammy Nunez who held the State Senate seat from Plaquemines and St. Bernard Parish since 1969; Nunez was also President of the State Senate. J.E Jumonville was also a State Senator who held a rural district based around western Baton Rouge.

I didn't do a second place map for this, as it was basically a matchup between Breax and Moore.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: smoltchanov on May 03, 2014, 12:34:14 AM
Speaking about geography - Shreveport area seems to be more conservative at that time then now, while Acadiana - vice versa (yes, i know that Breaux was a congressman from that area, but the same is true for many other races)...


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on May 03, 2014, 08:00:56 AM
Speaking about geography - Shreveport area seems to be more conservative at that time then now, while Acadiana - vice versa (yes, i know that Breaux was a congressman from that area, but the same is true for many other races)...

I was actually surprised to see that Moore cleared 50% in CD4. Shreveport strikes me as a very much a conservative 'old south' area and, locally, I think it was moving towards the GOP beginning in the early 80's. Shreveport had a decent population of older, upper-class Democrats; someone from Baton Rouge may have had more appeal to them than a populist like Breaux. Acadiana was usually more Democratic than the rest of the state and didn't start moving Republican until the early 90's (its trended R in every Pres. election since 1992).

Here's the runoff. Breaux had a better showing in CD4, but still lost Caddo parish by 12.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on May 03, 2014, 08:37:11 AM
Going along with that, here's the swing from Breaux/Moore '86 to Duke/Johnston '90.

Duke performed 5% worse than Moore but improved in 45 (!) parishes. 'Very obvious rural/urban contrast.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on May 11, 2014, 01:03:28 AM
Miles, this new NCSBE layout is really a problem.  Are you still able to find county and precinct maps like they had before?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on May 11, 2014, 09:44:45 AM
Miles, this new NCSBE layout is really a problem.  Are you still able to find county and precinct maps like they had before?

Yeah, its a shame. NC went from one of the best systems to one of the worst. I can still get precinct-level data, but the process is much messier. I'm waiting a while for the state to allocate the early/absentee votes by VTD, then I'll have some precinct maps for last week's races!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on July 11, 2014, 02:42:14 AM
Miles, I just found this cool map at N&O.  Does it look accurate to you?  Are all the votes allocated?  I know the "registered minorities" thing is wrong.

http://www.newsobserver.com/ncprecincts/


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on July 11, 2014, 12:28:55 PM
^ Thanks, good find. It mostly matches up to my precinct map (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=155525.msg3637980#msg3637980) but I've found a few differences. I guess I was bound to make a few errors going through all that data. I can't tell if they've allocated the absentees, etc. by VTD because they use percentages instead of the raw vote totals. The biggest error on that map looks like Greene County. They have Romney winning all the precincts; I know Obama won at least two. I'll check it out. 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JacobNC on July 11, 2014, 11:15:10 PM
I also see errors in Bladen and Gates Counties.  Shame, because the interactive precinct map is cool.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on August 15, 2014, 08:36:45 PM
This was when one of my favorites, ol' Bev Perdue was elected Governor:

()

LINK TO FULL SIZE MAP. (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/91403_perduewing1.png)

Actually started on this back in February! I got about 75-80% of the way through before realizing I forgot to calculate for absentee/early votes. In a state like NC, they usually account for 25-40% of the total vote, a significant chunk. After I realized that, this kinda feel to the wayside until a few weeks ago when I picked it back up!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: International Brotherhood of Bernard on December 24, 2014, 03:41:08 PM
I know the wounds are still fresh, but do you have/are you making precinct maps for NC-Sen and LA-Sen runoff this year? I'd be really thankful for them :)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 24, 2014, 06:31:29 PM
^ Its on my list, but I haven't gotten to the full statewide results yet; I did put some county/parish results on the LA/NC 2014 thread, though.

NC is usually easier and less complex, so I'll probably do it before LA.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: windjammer on December 24, 2014, 06:37:47 PM
This was when one of my favorites, ol' Bev Perdue was elected Governor:

()

LINK TO FULL SIZE MAP. (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/91403_perduewing1.png)

Actually started on this back in February! I got about 75-80% of the way through before realizing I forgot to calculate for absentee/early votes. In a state like NC, they usually account for 25-40% of the total vote, a significant chunk. After I realized that, this kinda feel to the wayside until a few weeks ago when I picked it back up!
I'm obviously not an expert at all in NC, but from all the maps you did about your North Carolina, East North Carolina has been really overperformed by Perdue, right? :P


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Fuzzybigfoot on December 24, 2014, 09:02:13 PM
This was when one of my favorites, ol' Bev Perdue was elected Governor:

()

LINK TO FULL SIZE MAP. (http://www.pictureshack.us/images/91403_perduewing1.png)

Actually started on this back in February! I got about 75-80% of the way through before realizing I forgot to calculate for absentee/early votes. In a state like NC, they usually account for 25-40% of the total vote, a significant chunk. After I realized that, this kinda feel to the wayside until a few weeks ago when I picked it back up!

Nice!  Most of the real decline came from the Charlotte area.  I wonder how McCrory will hold up there next time around.  


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 25, 2014, 10:27:33 PM
I'm obviously not an expert at all in NC, but from all the maps you did about your North Carolina, East North Carolina has been really overperformed by Perdue, right? :P

Yep, Perdue is from New Bern (in Craven County) and represented the area in the legislature from the late 1980's until she ran statewide in 2000. She was popular in her district and was reelected easily. For example, this was her last State Senate race before she ran for LG:
()

Nice!  Most of the real decline came from the Charlotte area.  I wonder how McCrory will hold up there next time around. 

Yep. McCrory was running as the very popular mayor of Charlotte. Just to show how much NC swung Democratic in 2008, McCrory, even with his regional appeal there, was still running behind Bush 04 in most of the counties around Charlotte.

Both McCrory and Perdue still had impressive crossover support in their respective regions.

I don't think there's any way McCrory carries Mecklenburg County again, though (assuming he's in a competitive race).


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 29, 2014, 01:54:51 AM
I'll migrate back over here to start posting my result maps, instead of in the LA/NC 2014 update thread.

I'll crosspost this here anyway:

Tillis vs Amendment 1 in Mecklenburg County:

()

As a percentage of his vote, I think there's a good chance Tillis had more Against voters than For voters.

I have a feeling that there were more Hagan/For voters than Tillis/Against voters (just going by the sheer margin Hagan carried the county by).

My precinct in southern Charlotte was 56% Tillis, but voted 53/47 against Amendment 1; a pretty typical result for that area.


I'm hoping to eventually do a similar statewide map of the Senate race vs Amendment 1, but if there are any requests for specific counties, I'm happy to entertain them.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Flake on December 29, 2014, 03:25:23 PM
Buncombe county :)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 01, 2015, 03:18:58 AM
I revised my color scale and redid Meckleburg County:

()

Hopefully the color nuances are easier to distinguish with this map than with the previous version.

Buncombe will be next.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 01, 2015, 06:28:40 AM
Buncombe County:

()

Interestingly enough, the only anti-Hagan/pro-SSM precinct was the one that contains the Biltmore Estate (the lavender precinct south of the light-pink ones in downtown Asheville). I guess the country club Republicans there managed to stomach Tillis.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 01, 2015, 08:41:12 PM
Orleans Parish: Landrieu Edition

()

I compared Mary's % in the Senate runoff to Mitch's % in the Mayoral primary.

There wasn't a Republican running the Mayoral race, and Mitch's main opponent was a black Democrat, Michael Bagneris. Thats why most of the white-majority precincts, such as my home neighborhood of Lakeview (the cluster of purple precincts in the northwest) were pro-Mitch/anti-Mary.

Conversely, Mitch's worst precincts were black-majority and went >90% for Mary in the Senate race.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 02, 2015, 02:48:42 PM
The runoff electorate was actually more Democratic than the state as a whole; Democrats made up a slight majorty of the electorate while their overall registration advantage is 47/28/25. The Independent share was down the most, compared to the statewide registration; probably a function of partisans mobilizing their base voters.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: smoltchanov on January 02, 2015, 03:22:49 PM
Well, as i got accustomed, that doesn't means much in the South. A tangible percentage of registered Democrats there almost always votes Republican (while almost no one - vice versa), and most of the Southern Indies are conservative too....


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 03, 2015, 08:43:41 AM
Hagan 2014 vs Amendment I 2012 by County; eventually I'll make this into a statewide precinct-level map.

Basically, the gist of this map, in regards to the color scheme is: redder= more Democratic, bluer= less Democratic, darker= anti-SSM, lighter= pro-SSM.

()

Watauga and Dare were the only two anti-Hagan/pro-SSM counties.

I did a few other maps for comparison (they all use the same color scale):

Hagan 2008 vs Amendment I:

()

Lots more red/fuchsia, especially out east. Despite the statewide swing against her, in both the 2008 and 2014 maps, Wake and Mecklenburg counties are, respectively, the exact same color shades.

Obama 2012:

()

Hagan's 2014 map looks much more like this than her 2008 map.

2012 Statewide Democratic Average:

()

Democrats took a slight majority of the total non-Presidential statewide vote in 2012. Because of the nationalization of the Senate race, Hagan's map still looks more like Obama's than this one.

And finally, this was for my own curiosity more than anything else, here's Perdue 2008 vs Amendment I:

()

This is the only map in this quintet where all the pro-SSM counties voted Democratic (Perdue carried Dare County, unlike the other maps).


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 03, 2015, 11:43:03 PM
Sort of random here, but I'm starting a sub-series on New Orleans mayoral races.

I'll start with the 2002 primary:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: smoltchanov on January 04, 2015, 01:01:18 AM
Miles, in such races, where almost all candidates belong to one party (Democrats in this case) some clarifications (black/white, liberal/centrist/conservative, and so on), are, IMHO, necessary. Not everyone knows all candidates and their positions...


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 04, 2015, 01:13:19 AM
^ I just make the maps. You probably know more than me about some of these races.

The 2002 mayor race was the first non-Presidential that I ever remember following. As an elementary school kid, I obviously didn't know much about the nuances of the race other than that my family supported and campaigned for Nagin.

Its pretty obvious Nagin became the de-facto Republican, winning the majority-white precincts. I'm also going to do precinct maps comparing % Nagin to % white. The change between 2002 and 2006 should be pretty interesting.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: smoltchanov on January 04, 2015, 01:15:44 AM
Pennington (chief of police/black) and Singleton (city councilman/black) completely escaped my mind))) Other are relatively well-known. Thanks!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: nclib on January 07, 2015, 12:31:54 AM
Miles, can you make a swing/trend map for KS-Sen, treating Orman as a Dem?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 09, 2015, 12:40:00 AM
The KS maps really help show why Orman didn't carry KS-02; outside of that Kansas City-Topeka stretch, much of the district swung to Roberts.

Swing: (http://www.openheatmap.com/view.html?map=GangliosidesVoronoffsParachronisms)

()

Trend: (http://www.openheatmap.com/view.html?map=UngassedFreeholdGeomaly)

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: nclib on January 09, 2015, 07:28:29 PM
What were the strongest swings?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 09, 2015, 07:58:53 PM
^ You can click the links and the counties show you the swing/trend values if you hover over them ;)

Ellsworth, McPherson, Saline, Riley, Morris, and Douglas counties were all over 20% swing to Orman.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: nclib on January 09, 2015, 08:56:23 PM
^ You can click the links and the counties show you the swing/trend values if you hover over them ;)

Ellsworth, McPherson, Saline, Riley, Morris, and Douglas counties were all over 20% swing to Orman.

I misread the map and thought red was republican. Why is there more blue on the second map? Or is this compared to the state rather than the nation?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 09, 2015, 09:59:46 PM
^ You can click the links and the counties show you the swing/trend values if you hover over them ;)

Ellsworth, McPherson, Saline, Riley, Morris, and Douglas counties were all over 20% swing to Orman.

I misread the map and thought red was republican. Why is there more blue on the second map? Or is this compared to the state rather than the nation?

For non-Presidential races, I almost always do trends based on the state, not the country. I should have clarified that. I think given the differences between the candidates in each each state, it makes more sense to do it that way.

The statewide swing was 12.98% to Orman, so any counties that swung to him less than that are purple or blue on the second map.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 11, 2015, 07:55:21 AM
I'll dedicate this map to Tmth :)

()

And for Phil:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JerryArkansas on January 11, 2015, 08:00:09 AM
Miles, could I request a map?  I would love one of Washington and Benton Counties in Arkansas.  By the way, they look amazing as per usual.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Oldiesfreak1854 on January 11, 2015, 09:28:20 AM
Johnson County must be swinging GOP, because I thought it was a Dem-leaning county (or at least a swing county.)

How do you get the precinct maps if they aren't available on OpenHeatMap?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 11, 2015, 03:54:52 PM
^ Not really. It was never especially Dem-leaning, to say the least. FDR and, I guess ironically, LBJ never even carried it. In the past few decades, its moved from being to the right of the state to being a few points to the left now.

I generally use DRA for precinct-level maps. I'm a fan of OpenHeatMap, but it only goes down to the county-level.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on January 11, 2015, 04:45:20 PM
^ Not really. It was never especially Dem-leaning, to say the least. FDR and, I guess ironically, LBJ never even carried it. In the past few decades, its moved from being to the right of the state to being a few points to the left now.



Its certainly a must-win for any Democrat in a statewide race. 



Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Senator Cris on January 11, 2015, 04:53:02 PM
Miles, your maps are wonderful. :)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 11, 2015, 05:36:09 PM
Jerry, I'm working on your AR maps.

I actually just got done with this map of Jefferson County, CO. I suppose I'll 'dedicate' it to Cris, as our number one Gardner fan. Yes, Gardner didn't actually carry the county, but one of his bragging points is that he won statewide without winning Jefferson.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JerryArkansas on January 11, 2015, 05:44:32 PM
Jerry, I'm working on your AR maps.
Thanks Miles, and Jefferson county looks great.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Senator Cris on January 12, 2015, 08:40:23 AM
Thank you Miles! :)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Oldiesfreak1854 on January 13, 2015, 04:54:03 PM


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Ashbringer on January 13, 2015, 05:06:52 PM
great maps


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 15, 2015, 12:23:12 AM
()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Fuzzybigfoot on January 15, 2015, 12:30:36 AM
Excellent work! 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: JerryArkansas on January 15, 2015, 07:41:37 AM
Great work Miles.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 18, 2015, 03:18:16 AM
Ross was shut out of Benton County and Pryor was four votes away from losing his only precinct.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: MarkUterus on January 21, 2015, 08:03:15 AM
Just wanted to say that I just spent a good hour scouring this thread. Thanks for the maps! Wow, it really goes to show just how unpopular Brownback is if he lost half of Mission Hills (even though he won re-election)...


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 21, 2015, 08:23:02 AM
^ Thanks!

Yeah, Brownback won Mission Hills barely (51/49); also, FWIW, the rest of the municipal breakdowns for the Governor' race are on page 55/56 of this report. (http://www.jocoelection.org/Archives/Results/GEMS%20SOVC%20REPORTofficialfinal111014.pdf) The biggest municipality that Davis won was Overland Park.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 21, 2015, 08:16:15 PM
Now for something quite different; I suppose I'm a few Hours early for this to be a #ThrowbackThursday post, but here ya go.

One of the fun facts about Louisiana is that its had more constitutions (11) than any other state. The current version was the product of a convention called during Edwin Edwards' first term, in 1973. The Constitution before that was from the early 1920's and had over 500 (!) amendments. The convention of 1973 started with a great deal of hope and enthusiasm, but turned into something of a cluster. Still, the legislators came up with a draft and put it up for a vote in April 1974.

I've been looking around for a while for a parish-level map of the vote; I couldn't find it anywhere until I recently thought to just request data from the secretary of state!

(And yes, as I've done a few times before, I used the LA colors (purple/gold) instead of red/blue ;) )

()

As far as the coalitions go, I was actually expecting something that looked like the current D/R coalition. The new constitution expanded the jurisdiction/taxing power of local governments, so I naturally expected the more fiscally conservative areas to be against it. That pretty much holds up in the north. From what I understand, most of the younger, reform-minded legislators who pushed hardest for the new constitution were from the New Orleans metro/eastern Acadiana, which must be why it did so well there.

Also of note is that the jungle primary was established through this constitution.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Fuzzybigfoot on January 25, 2015, 02:17:56 AM
Could you make a precinct map of the 2012 Presidential Election in West Virginia?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 25, 2015, 02:24:36 AM
^ Sadly, in all the years I've been going to the WV SOS site, I've never seen precinct results.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Fuzzybigfoot on January 25, 2015, 02:37:55 AM
^ Sadly, in all the years I've been going to the WV SOS site, I've never seen precinct results.

Darn!  Could you do Salt Lake County, Utah for 2012?  Or Adams County for the 2014 Senatorial Race? 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 25, 2015, 02:52:34 AM
^ I'll see about Salt Lake, UT.

Adams, CO was literally the only county in CO that I had issues getting precinct results for.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Fuzzybigfoot on January 25, 2015, 02:56:31 AM
^ I'll see about Salt Lake, UT.

Adams, CO was literally the only county in CO that I had issues getting precinct results for.

Cool, thanks!
 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 28, 2015, 01:00:11 PM
^ I'll see about Salt Lake, UT.

Adams, CO was literally the only county in CO that I had issues getting precinct results for.

Cool, thanks!

For Salt Lake County, I can't find a shapefile for 2012. The good news is that I requested precinct results from the county and they also sent me a list of precinct codes/locations for 2012. Hopefully, the lines didn't change that much from 2008 and I'll be able to cobble something together using the DRA shapefile.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 29, 2015, 05:32:38 AM
Many thanks to Cinyc, who helped me understand the program(s) that I used to generate this; it would have taken me at least a few more weeks to get to this otherwise.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 31, 2015, 05:24:52 PM
Sean Haugh's performance by precinct:

()

Columbus and Swain counties would have almost certainly flipped to Hagan without Haugh on the ballot, likely Cawsell too. Haugh acted more like a conservaDem protest vote more than anything else.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: badgate on January 31, 2015, 06:47:31 PM
Many thanks to Cinyc, who helped me understand the program(s) that I used to generate this; it would have taken me at least a few more weeks to get to this otherwise.

()

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 05, 2015, 02:00:19 AM
Continuing my streak of #TBT posts, as he's been in the news lately, this was the last time that David Duke was on the ballot. This was LA-01, which happens to by my home district, in 1999. There was a special election after Bob Livingston resigned his seat.

The contest basically turned into a three-way between candidates named "David." Dave Treen was the former Governor; he was probably the most non-ideological of the bunch and I'm sure my family members would have supported him. David Duke carried LA-01 the last time he ran for Congress, (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?action=gallery;sa=view&id=10604) in his race against Bennett Johnston. And finally, David Vitter was an up-and-coming younger legislator from Metairie.

Duke retained strong support from 1) rural voters in the Florida Parishes and 2) (presumably white) working-class voters in southern Jefferson Parish.

Vitter beat out Duke largely by putting up overwhelming margins in his State House seat (the cluster of dark blue). Notice that if you move just east of the Vitter's blue cluster, his support drops off noticeably. Thats my home neighborhood of Lakeview; its the Republican-leaning part of Orleans Parish. Its generally more socially moderate, so Vitter and Duke were relatively bad fits for the area.

Treen's formula for getting first place was run up the score in St. Tammany Parish plus finishing second in Jefferson.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Joe Republic on February 05, 2015, 02:09:00 AM
"Monica Monica"?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 05, 2015, 02:12:36 AM
^ Yep! Not a typo! (http://www.ourcampaigns.com/CandidateDetail.html?CandidateID=3859)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: smoltchanov on February 05, 2015, 03:11:05 AM
And Bill Strain seems to be a rural conservative Democrat from NW part of the district. Am i correct? If so - he is, probably, a person Vitter owes his victory over Duke here, and all career that followed...


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on February 05, 2015, 04:17:34 AM
^ That might be a good way to look at it. He's the cousin of Mike Strain (R), the current Ag Commissioner.

Maybe, but I'm sure if Vitter didn't win this, it would have have found something else.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 13, 2016, 11:16:33 AM
The Louisiana Senate primary!

Kennedy (blue) - 25%
Campbell (red) - 17.5%
Boustany (purple) - 15%
Fayard (yellow) - 12.5%
Fleming (green) - 10.5%

Cao (cyan) and Duke (orange) only carried two or three precincts each. Any other candidate who won a precinct is teal.

()

New Orleans:

()

^ As expected, Campbell did better in black areas, while Fayard won white liberal areas. In New Orleans east, there's a fair Vietnamese population - notice Cao won three precincts there, despite taking 1.09% overall.

Baton Rouge/Lafayette:

()

Lake Charles, where Gary Landrieu won one random precinct:

()

Alexandria:

()

Northern LA:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Torie on November 13, 2016, 11:36:37 AM
Wonderful maps showing regional voting patterns, just wonderful. :)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 13, 2016, 04:09:54 PM
^ Thanks!

Here's one of MN. Comparing HRC 's margins (red) to the DFL Congressional candidates (blue):

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Heisenberg on November 13, 2016, 07:56:48 PM
Miles, since you didn't mention it, and I couldn't find them, could you please tell me where the precincts Duke won are? And thanks for the maps, I love them!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 13, 2016, 08:21:54 PM
^ They were very small. He carried one precinct in each of Avoyelles, Tangipahoa, and Evangeline parishes.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Fuzzybigfoot on November 13, 2016, 09:31:06 PM
Epic!

Do you have the CD tallies for the presidential race in Minnesota? 


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 14, 2016, 12:31:12 AM
^ Yeah, from the SOS site:

CD1: 53/38 Trump
CD2: 46/45 Trump
CD3: 50/40 Clinton
CD4: 61/30 Clinton
CD5: 73/18 Clinton
CD6: 58/33 Trump
CD7: 61/31 Trump
CD8: 54/38 Trump


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Heisenberg on November 14, 2016, 12:49:47 AM
^So basically, 1 and 6-8 were pretty Trumpy, and 2 remained pretty even, yet MN-03 swung against Trump enough to deliver the state to Clinton. Anyone have an idea why 3 swung hard left but not 2?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Torie on November 14, 2016, 11:06:44 AM
^So basically, 1 and 6-8 were pretty Trumpy, and 2 remained pretty even, yet MN-03 swung against Trump enough to deliver the state to Clinton. Anyone have an idea why 3 swung hard left but not 2?

MN-03 is the most upscale CD in MN in SES by far. So it moved hard against Trump, while more middle class MN-02 was about static. So this fits the expected pattern well.

Off topic a tad, but the biggest shock to me, is that Trump did about the same with white voters as Romney (just a one point difference), but cut into the Dem percentages with respect to persons of color. That combined with a drop in black turnout, was what swung the election. The static nature of the white split shows just how dramatic whites diverged when it comes to swing by SES status, and "cosmopolitanism."


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 15, 2016, 07:37:13 PM
LA-03

A close result for Scott Angelle. I didn't expect him to avoid a runoff, but I thought he'd finish clearly ahead in the primary.

Angelle actually carried the district with a larger % share (https://twitter.com/JMilesColeman/status/658275539376058368) last year in the Governor primary than he got here.

Scott Angelle (R - orange) - 28.6%
Clay Higgins (R - blue) - 26.5%
Jacob Hebert (D - red) - 8.9%
Larry Rader (D - yellow) - 8.7%
Gus Rantz (R - purple) - 8.0%
Greg Ellison (R - cyan) - 7.8%
Brett Geymann (R - teal) - 6.7%

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon on November 15, 2016, 07:41:34 PM
What are the chances of Angelle losing the runoff?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 15, 2016, 08:16:37 PM
It should be very nasty - a good follow-up to Boustany/Landry.

Angelle is being compared to Neil Riser from LA-05 in 2013. Higgins is running as the 'outsider' as McAllister did, but Angelle should get more support from Democrats. That said, Higgins has a more dedicated base.

Angelle's strength in Calcasieu Parish is probably encouraging, as its the area furthest from his PSC district.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 18, 2016, 10:07:36 PM
Maricopa County Sheriff

Penzone (D) - 56.4%
Arpaio (R) - 43.6%

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 19, 2016, 11:28:10 AM
Erie, PA

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 20, 2016, 12:42:23 PM
Lackawanna County

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: diptheriadan on November 20, 2016, 10:30:55 PM
Do you have a map for Tennessee or Montgomery County?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 20, 2016, 10:50:45 PM
^ Tennessee doesn't have precinct data out yet. I'm working on several PA counties.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: publicunofficial on November 20, 2016, 11:40:50 PM

#1 Reason we should've gone with Joe.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: ElectionsGuy on November 20, 2016, 11:45:09 PM
Maricopa County Sheriff

Penzone (D) - 56.4%
Arpaio (R) - 43.6%

()


Sad!

That is one DAMNING result, especially in such a large county.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 21, 2016, 12:35:07 AM
Franklin County, OH

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Fuzzybigfoot on November 21, 2016, 01:28:46 AM
You wouldn't happen to have the results for OH-3, would you?  ;)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 21, 2016, 01:35:10 AM
^ Yep!

Clinton - 65.9%
Trump - 28.5%
Other - 5.6%


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Fuzzybigfoot on November 21, 2016, 01:36:36 AM
^ Yep!

Clinton - 65.9%
Trump - 28.5%
Other - 5.6%

Thanks!  ;D ;D ;D ;D


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon on November 21, 2016, 01:39:53 AM

How Clinton lost PA: Exhibit A

The next democrat to win PA will need to realize that there is something that is not Philadelphia and Allegheny counties.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Chancellor Tanterterg on November 21, 2016, 07:45:13 AM

Fascinating.  I kept telling people Hillary wouldn't over-perform so much in Hilliard.  I remember when a Republican who did that badly in Dublin was a goner in Ohio elections :P  It's also nice to see that Gahanna was almost certainly on the right side of history this time around; don't blame us :P  That said, without having checked the county results my guess from that map is that Franklin County actually swung 1-3% away from the Democrats this year, no way she cracked 60% (then again, Obama was a great candidate for Franklin County for a wide variety of reasons; Hillary Clinton...not so much).


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 21, 2016, 06:54:57 PM
Bucks County

()

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon on November 21, 2016, 08:20:16 PM

Why Clinton lost PA: Exhibit B - forget that Erie County exists and likes to vote republican once in a while.


Why Clinton lost PA: Exhibit C - allow bucks county to narrow from a 1.3% margin to a 0.6% margin + lose at least a full 1% to Johnson + Stein



Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: publicunofficial on November 21, 2016, 08:35:02 PM
Clinton's Pennsylvania strategy seemed to be: "Go after wealthy voters in Philly suburbs, assume left-leaning blue collar workers will stay the same as 2012"


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: publicunofficial on November 21, 2016, 08:56:50 PM
Miles, can I request Orange County?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 21, 2016, 09:45:29 PM
^ Yes, but the LA Times is keeping an interactive map over here. (http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-pol-ca-california-neighborhood-election-results/)


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 21, 2016, 11:11:03 PM
A few TX maps:

Bexar County

()


Travis County

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon on November 22, 2016, 07:49:33 PM
Interesting that Bexar has a number of precincts with no votes cast.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 23, 2016, 11:24:17 AM
^ Some were just empty, but my shapefile was slightly old, so maybe a few that just didn't match up.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Torie on November 23, 2016, 11:56:53 AM
^ Yes, but the LA Times is keeping an interactive map over here. (http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-pol-ca-california-neighborhood-election-results/)

Trump carried my old precinct in Orange County by but 3 points, at least a 7 point swing to Clinton from 2012. That is no surprise. The precinct has next to no working class white voters, and is highly educated, with a fair number of high income Asians.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 23, 2016, 08:46:46 PM
Luzerne County

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 24, 2016, 10:16:16 PM
Cook, DuPage, and Lake Counties

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: LLR on November 25, 2016, 08:08:13 AM
Could I request Hamilton County, Ohio?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Green Line on November 26, 2016, 12:43:57 AM

God bless Mt. Greenwood! LOL


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: libertpaulian on November 28, 2016, 05:07:36 PM
Do you happen to have Lake County, Indiana? :D


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 28, 2016, 05:13:39 PM
^ Not ATM, but can look into it!


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 28, 2016, 05:14:09 PM
Salt Lake County, UT

I was expecting more green for McMullin...only a few precincts.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: jamestroll on November 28, 2016, 05:50:08 PM
Thanks Miles!

Can you do St Louis County, MO?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on November 28, 2016, 06:34:34 PM
FWIW, HRC carried Salt Lake City itself with 66% to Trump's 16% and McMullin's 11%.


I'll have to look for St. Louis shapefiles, but it works I'll post it.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: RI on November 28, 2016, 07:29:40 PM
FWIW, HRC carried Salt Lake City itself with 66% to Trump's 16% and McMullin's 11%.

I'll have to look for St. Louis shapefiles, but it works I'll post it.

In my experience, St. Louis County is a pain for this.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Skye on November 29, 2016, 06:26:12 AM
FWIW, HRC carried Salt Lake City itself with 66% to Trump's 16% and McMullin's 11%.


I'll have to look for St. Louis shapefiles, but it works I'll post it.
Hey! Do you know what the results of the City were for Romney v. Obama? I'm interested in those.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Fuzzybigfoot on November 29, 2016, 07:14:15 AM
FWIW, HRC carried Salt Lake City itself with 66% to Trump's 16% and McMullin's 11%.


I'll have to look for St. Louis shapefiles, but it works I'll post it.
Hey! Do you know what the results of the City were for Romney v. Obama? I'm interested in those.

It was probably 60%-40% Obama, or something close to that.  It was about 68%-29% in 2008.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 01, 2016, 12:57:03 AM
I'm waiting on a few more counties for PA by municipality:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: ProgressiveCanadian on December 01, 2016, 07:20:01 AM
She did terrible in Pennsylvania.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon on December 01, 2016, 10:31:13 PM

She got margins that should have been enough in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, but they weren't because she seemed to just assume the suburbs would go for her without any effort. While that was true in the inner suburbs (which is why she came within 50k votes of winning the state), the outer ones (Allentown, Lackawanna, Luzerne, and so on) it wasn't true. Plus the T turned out in record numbers for Trump. The growth of the cities in PA even as rural areas shrink could mean that this result is just a "last hurrah" for the state's conservatives though.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 04, 2016, 01:32:26 AM
Ohio by town:

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 19, 2016, 07:51:37 PM
ILLINOIS

HRC - 55.8%
TRUMP - 38.8%


()

SENATE
DUCKWORTH - 54.9%
KIRK - 39.8%


()

COMPTROLLER
MENDOZA - 49.4%
MUNGER - 44.4%


()

HRC (blue) vs DUCKWORTH (red)

()


HRC (blue) vs MENDOZA (red)

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon on December 19, 2016, 07:57:21 PM
Kirk is such an embarrassment to the Illinois Republican Party.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 21, 2016, 10:47:23 PM
Orange County CA President

Clinton - 50.9%
Trump - 42.4%

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Sbane on December 22, 2016, 07:33:44 PM
Love how solid Irvine is. You can definitely have a Democratic congressional district anchored by Irvine, Costa Mesa, Laguna Beach, Tustin and Aliso Viejo. Throw in some of Santa Ana and Garden Grove and you seal the deal. And getting rid of Royce in north OC shouldn't be so hard either....California should get rid of the redistricting commission for congressional districts (keep it for state assembly and state senate though).


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 23, 2016, 12:23:33 AM
Senate

Harris (gold) - 53.3%
Sanchez (purple) - 46.7%

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on December 26, 2016, 11:50:02 PM
LOS ANGELES

()

()

()

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 02, 2017, 04:54:08 AM
My district!

()

()

Comstock (blue) vs Trump (red):

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr. Illini on January 02, 2017, 10:59:23 AM
Need a Democrat that can limit that crossover in McLean and vicinity. Those are big crossover margins.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 07, 2017, 01:25:35 PM
Harris (gold)
Sanchez (purple)

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Miles on January 08, 2017, 04:14:55 PM
CO-06

Coffman beat State Sen. Morgan Carroll 51/43.

()


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon on January 08, 2017, 04:36:50 PM
^ And he did that with Clinton carrying the district by 9 points. It's pretty clear that he would have defeated Bennet had he been persuaded to run for Senate.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Gass3268 on January 08, 2017, 06:05:52 PM
^ And he did that with Clinton carrying the district by 9 points. It's pretty clear that he would have defeated Bennet had he been persuaded to run for Senate.

Dynamics change when you go statewide, can't always extrapolate from the district level.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Mr.Phips on January 09, 2017, 05:06:00 PM
^ And he did that with Clinton carrying the district by 9 points. It's pretty clear that he would have defeated Bennet had he been persuaded to run for Senate.

Dynamics change when you go statewide, can't always extrapolate from the district level.

Yeah and the fact that Bennett was the incumbent in a state that Hillary won.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Figueira on January 09, 2017, 06:16:16 PM
^ And he did that with Clinton carrying the district by 9 points. It's pretty clear that he would have defeated Bennet had he been persuaded to run for Senate.

Just like Patrick Murphy's impressive win in a Republican-leaning district in 2014 proved that he would easily beat Rubio?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon on January 09, 2017, 06:21:49 PM
^ And he did that with Clinton carrying the district by 9 points. It's pretty clear that he would have defeated Bennet had he been persuaded to run for Senate.

Just like Patrick Murphy's impressive win in a Republican-leaning district in 2014 proved that he would easily beat Rubio?


Rubio is flawless, Bennett is not.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Nyvin on January 09, 2017, 06:28:06 PM
^ And he did that with Clinton carrying the district by 9 points. It's pretty clear that he would have defeated Bennet had he been persuaded to run for Senate.

Just like Patrick Murphy's impressive win in a Republican-leaning district in 2014 proved that he would easily beat Rubio?


Rubio is flawless, Bennett is not.

His primary loss in Florida would say otherwise.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Heisenberg on January 09, 2017, 07:50:13 PM
Miles, could you please do MO-06 (President, Senate, and House)?


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Bidenworth2020 on June 03, 2018, 09:55:38 PM
come back miles.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Oryxslayer on June 03, 2018, 10:01:02 PM

I sat down for lunch with him last week, he mentioned he had to leave Atlas because of some commitment or issue.


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Bidenworth2020 on June 03, 2018, 10:56:51 PM

I sat down for lunch with him last week, he mentioned he had to leave Atlas because of some commitment or issue.
well, I wish him the best then :(


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: Adam Griffin on June 04, 2018, 02:44:49 PM
I always figured it was because of his DDHQ commitments (i.e. them not allowing him to post content on other sites), but thinking back, it might also be an employer requirement (if he still works for the same entity he once did).


Title: Re: Miles' Election Map Thread
Post by: 🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸 on June 05, 2018, 12:46:08 AM

I sat down for lunch with him last week, he mentioned he had to leave Atlas because of some commitment or issue.
well, I wish him the best then :(



you can follow him here:  https://twitter.com/JMilesColeman