Title: Bush / Perot 92
Post by: Jerseyrules on August 16, 2012, 02:08:55 AM
Either Perot or Powell is tapped for VP, and either way Perot offers Bush his support. Economy is doing alright, with unemployment decreasing. What happens? Unemployment is 6.5% on election day, discuss with maps.
Title: Re: Bush / Perot 92
Post by: Adam Griffin on August 16, 2012, 03:45:44 AM
Starting my map, I fully expected Clinton to get creamed. With that being said, here's the result:
(
)
Clinton - 270
Bush - 268
(
Clinton - 270
Bush - 268
Title: Re: Bush / Perot 92
Post by: Jerseyrules on August 16, 2012, 03:23:51 PM
Starting my map, I fully expected Clinton to get creamed. With that being said, here's the result:
()
Clinton - 270
Bush - 268
(
Clinton - 270
Bush - 268
No offense but this doesn't look like an OFAK...
Title: Re: Bush / Perot 92
Post by: ask_not on August 16, 2012, 03:59:22 PM
In 1966, however there is rebublican fatique and senator bill bradly or dick gephardt become the next president.
Title: Re: Bush / Perot 92
Post by: Jerseyrules on August 16, 2012, 09:09:50 PM
In 1966, however there is rebublican fatique and senator bill bradly or dick gephardt become the next president.
I knew you were a troll
Title: Re: Bush / Perot 92
Post by: ask_not on August 17, 2012, 02:15:08 PM
In 1966, however there is rebublican fatique and senator bill bradly or dick gephardt become the next president.
I knew you were a troll
Title: Re: Bush / Perot 92
Post by: Tricky Dickie on August 17, 2012, 02:27:49 PM
I don't think Perot would have accepted being Bush's runnig mate.
Title: Re: Bush / Perot 92
Post by: Jerseyrules on August 21, 2012, 03:01:39 PM
In 1966, however there is rebublican fatique and senator bill bradly or dick gephardt become the next president.
I knew you were a troll
Oh ok
Title: Re: Bush / Perot 92
Post by: Jerseyrules on August 21, 2012, 03:02:26 PM
I don't think Perot would have accepted being Bush's runnig mate.
I don't either, but if he did, would his otl 19% go to Bush's column?
Title: Re: Bush / Perot 92
Post by: Oldiesfreak1854 on September 02, 2012, 09:42:55 AM
Really? I thought you meant if Perot ran as the Democratic nominee.
Title: Re: Bush / Perot 92
Post by: Jerseyrules on September 02, 2012, 05:17:34 PM
Really? I thought you meant if Perot ran as the Democratic nominee.
Oh no, that would've been interesting though.
Title: Re: Bush / Perot 92
Post by: Fuzzy Bear on September 25, 2012, 07:42:34 PM
Powell would have been a game-changer for Bush. Perot would never have been VP, never, ever.
The only thing that could have beaten Bush under those circumstances would have been a 3rd party conservative insurgency of folks peeved about the dumping of Quayle. Bush should have dumped Quayle, but he didn't want the flak.
The only thing that could have beaten Bush under those circumstances would have been a 3rd party conservative insurgency of folks peeved about the dumping of Quayle. Bush should have dumped Quayle, but he didn't want the flak.