|
Title: Most Radical Realistic Map Post by: Akno21 on January 30, 2005, 09:27:19 AM Going with serious 2008 contenders, what is the EV map that would differ the most from the 2004 one.
Guliani/Coleman vs. Bredesen/Nelson () 273-265 Bredesen. Don't ask me how I got that map. Title: Re: Most Radical Realistic Map Post by: nclib on January 30, 2005, 11:48:02 AM Ben Nelson (NE) or Bill Nelson (FL)?
Title: Re: Most Radical Realistic Map Post by: Akno21 on January 30, 2005, 01:24:45 PM Ben Nelson (NE) or Bill Nelson (FL)? FL, how else would Bredesen carry it? Title: Re: Most Radical Realistic Map Post by: Keystone Phil on January 30, 2005, 01:28:15 PM Ben Nelson (NE) or Bill Nelson (FL)? FL, how else would Bredesen carry it? Bill Nelson might not even have his Senate seat after 2006. I don't think Bredesen would carry the state because Nelson is the VP candiate. Title: Re: Most Radical Realistic Map Post by: nclib on January 30, 2005, 02:50:54 PM Giuliani would probably win Oregon.
Title: Re: Most Radical Realistic Map Post by: A18 on January 30, 2005, 08:11:50 PM ...
Title: Re: Most Radical Realistic Map Post by: A18 on January 30, 2005, 08:12:28 PM Iraq emerges as a peaceful Islamic republic, the economy is roaring, tax reform is popular, and young people like Social Security reform:
() Iraq is a blood bath and Great Depression 2.0 happens: () ;) Title: Re: Most Radical Realistic Map Post by: patrick1 on January 30, 2005, 08:22:58 PM Giuliani would probably win Oregon. He would also win New York. He would win Long Island, Northen Suburbs of NYC in a rout. He would also hold down loss rates in NYC through a patchwork coalition of white ethnics and Jews in the Outer boroughs of NYC that helped him win mayorship. He would also handily win Upstate. Title: Re: Most Radical Realistic Map Post by: Defarge on January 30, 2005, 08:50:03 PM Why does VA vote Republican? :)
meanwhile, I agree with Patrick. Guiliani would win NY. Even I would vote for him, unless it was between him and Bayh. Title: Re: Most Radical Realistic Map Post by: Smash255 on January 30, 2005, 09:18:17 PM interesting poll with guliani & Clnton. Giuliani would narrowly beat Clinton if he ran for 2006 Senate, but in a Presidential matchup Clinton edges out Rudy in NY
Title: Re: Most Radical Realistic Map Post by: Alcon on January 30, 2005, 10:00:13 PM Iraq emerges as a peaceful Islamic republic, the economy is roaring, tax reform is popular, and young people like Social Security reform: () Iraq is a blood bath and Great Depression 2.0 happens: () ;) Thank you for shading South Dakota darker. Title: Re: Most Radical Realistic Map Post by: ?????????? on February 01, 2005, 01:33:41 AM Ben Nelson (NE) or Bill Nelson (FL)? FL, how else would Bredesen carry it? Bill Nelson might not even have his Senate seat after 2006. I don't think Bredesen would carry the state because Nelson is the VP candiate. Don't be so sure on that last part Phil. Title: Re: Most Radical Realistic Map Post by: FerrisBueller86 on February 01, 2005, 10:56:30 PM Iraq is a blood bath and Great Depression 2.0 happens: () ;) In a 49-state landslide for the Democrats, why would Virginia be the last Republican holdout? I'd expect the last Republican holdout to be Utah, Mississippi, Alabama, or South Carolina. Title: Re: Most Radical Realistic Map Post by: ATFFL on February 01, 2005, 11:28:08 PM Iraq is a blood bath and Great Depression 2.0 happens: () ;) In a 49-state landslide for the Democrats, why would Virginia be the last Republican holdout? I'd expect the last Republican holdout to be Utah, Mississippi, Alabama, or South Carolina. He is tweaking all of the Democrats on the board who continually insist that Virginia is a swing state. Then, when it turns out not to be close, they come in and say it is trending Dem and will be a swing state in 4 years. |