Title: Opposite Party Targets 2013-2018 (SEN and GOV) Post by: ElectionsGuy on August 14, 2013, 04:40:06 PM A list of of republicans in Obama (2012) states and democrats in Romney states in the Senate and Governorships.
Democrats (Republican Targets): Senate: 2014: Mark Begich (D-AK) Mark Pryor (D-AR) Mary Landrieu (D-LA) OPEN (D-MT) Kay Hagan (D-NC) OPEN (D-SD) OPEN (D-WV) 2016: NONE 2018: Joe Donnelly (D-IN) Claire McCaskill (D-MO) Jon Tester (D-MT) Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND) Joe Manchin (D-WV) Governorships: 2013: NONE 2014: OPEN (D-AR) 2015: OPEN (D-KY) 2016: OPEN (D-MO) Steve Bullock (D-MT) OPEN (D-WV) Republicans (Democratic Targets): Senate: 2014: Susan Collins (R-ME) 2016: Marco Rubio (R-FL) Mark Kirk (R-IL) Chuck Grassely (R-IA) Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) Rob Portman (R-OH) Pat Toomey (R-PA) Ron Johnson (R-WI) 2018: Dean Heller (R-NV) Governorships: 2013: Chris Christie (R-NJ) (obviously safe) OPEN (R-VA) 2014: Rick Scott (R-FL) Terry Branstad (R-IA) Paul LePage (R-ME) Rick Snyder (R-MI) Brian Sandoval (R-NV) Susana Martinez (R-NM) John Kasich (R-OH) Tom Corbett (R-PA) Scott Walker (R-WI) 2015: NONE 2016: NONE Conclusion: The democrats should have a good Senate year in 2016, and a good governor year in 2014. Meanwhile the republicans should have good Senate years in 2014 and 2018, and possibly a good governor year in 2016. Title: Re: Opposite Party Targets 2013-2018 (SEN and GOV) Post by: RogueBeaver on August 14, 2013, 04:46:15 PM Only quibble: Pubs would target Bennet and Reid in '16, especially if Gardner/Sandoval can be recruited.
Title: Re: Opposite Party Targets 2013-2018 (SEN and GOV) Post by: Vosem on August 14, 2013, 04:50:39 PM Only quibble: Pubs would target Bennet and Reid in '16, especially if Gardner/Sandoval can be recruited. He's listing Democrats in Romney states/Republicans in Obama states. Otherwise, for a start, Collins and Manchin wouldn't be on the list. Title: Re: Opposite Party Targets 2013-2018 (SEN and GOV) Post by: ElectionsGuy on August 14, 2013, 05:02:02 PM Only quibble: Pubs would target Bennet and Reid in '16, especially if Gardner/Sandoval can be recruited. He's listing Democrats in Romney states/Republicans in Obama states. Otherwise, for a start, Collins and Manchin wouldn't be on the list. If you want, I'll star the ones that are/aren't vulnerable. Title: Re: Opposite Party Targets 2013-2018 (SEN and GOV) Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on August 14, 2013, 05:15:44 PM GOP targets
Begich Landrieu Pryor MT open SD WV Democratic targets GA open 2016 Democratic targets Kirk Johnson Toomey GOP targets Bennett Title: Re: Opposite Party Targets 2013-2018 (SEN and GOV) Post by: windjammer on August 14, 2013, 06:20:58 PM I agree with Roguebeaver. The Pubs will have 2 targets who could flip in a neutral year with the right candidate:
-In Nevada: Reid could lose against the governor -In Colorado: Bennnet isn't really strong, but the Pubs would have to pick a decent nominee, maybe Mike Coffman? And in a republican year, the washington senate seat could flip too: Patty Murray isn't really popular and I read that Dave Reichert could challenge her, and Reichert is obviously a strong candidate. Title: Re: Opposite Party Targets 2013-2018 (SEN and GOV) Post by: ElectionsGuy on August 14, 2013, 06:38:08 PM GOP targets Begich Landrieu Pryor MT open SD WV Democratic targets GA open 2016 Democratic targets Kirk Johnson Toomey GOP targets Bennett I would add Ayotte to Democratic targets and Reid to republican targets and your list looks good. Title: Re: Opposite Party Targets 2013-2018 (SEN and GOV) Post by: emcee0 on August 14, 2013, 08:06:39 PM 2014
Mitch McConnell- lots of people are laughing at this but I'm serious. Democrats really need to help recruit Allison Lundergan Grimes. McConnell is the biggest PoS in the Senate and we cannot let the rich crooks win and the big money and special interests cronies win another election for McConnell. I am Canadian and I feel like I would be very tempted to come to Kentucky to campaign for Grimes Hopefully the Democrats can win or make the open seat in Georgia competitive for Nunn. Title: Re: Opposite Party Targets 2013-2018 (SEN and GOV) Post by: Oldiesfreak1854 on August 14, 2013, 08:32:58 PM 2014 Mitch McConnell- lots of people are laughing at this but I'm serious. Anyway, here would be my list. This doesn't necessarily take into account how these states voted in 2012, and we don't even know who's running in some of these races (colors are for the party currently holding the office): 2013 Governor Virginia 2014 Governor Arkansas Florida Illinois Maine Michigan Ohio Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina 2014 Senate Alaska Arkansas Georgia Iowa Kentucky Louisiana Michigan Montana New Hampshire North Carolina South Dakota West Virginia[/color] 2015 Governor Kentucky Louisiana 2016 Governor Delaware Missouri Montana North Carolina Washington West Virginia 2016 Senate Arizona Colorado Florida Illinois Kentucky Louisiana Missouri Nevada New Hampshire North Dakota Ohio Pennsylvania Wisconsin 2017 Governor New Jersey Virginia (Depends on who wins this year) 2018 Governor None (Depends on who wins in 2014) 2018 Senate Arizona Florida Indiana Maine (For both parties) Massachusetts Michigan Missouri Montana Nebraska New Mexico North Dakota Ohio Virginia West Virginia Wisconsin Conclusion: 2014 could be a good year for Republicans in the Senate but for either party for Governors; 2016 should be good for Democrats for Senate and Republicans for Governors; 2018 should be good for Republicans for Senate. Title: Re: Opposite Party Targets 2013-2018 (SEN and GOV) Post by: Mr.Phips on August 14, 2013, 08:47:38 PM Only quibble: Pubs would target Bennet and Reid in '16, especially if Gardner/Sandoval can be recruited. If Bennett and Reid couldn't be beaten in a year like 2010, they won't lose in a Presidential year. Neither of those states are getting any easier for Republicans. Title: Re: Opposite Party Targets 2013-2018 (SEN and GOV) Post by: free my dawg on August 14, 2013, 10:10:46 PM 2014 Mitch McConnell- lots of people are laughing at this but I'm serious. Anyway, here would be my list. This doesn't necessarily take into account how these states voted in 2012, and we don't even know who's running in some of these races (colors are for the party currently holding the office): 2013 Governor Virginia 2014 Governor Arkansas Florida Illinois Maine Michigan Ohio Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina 2014 Senate Alaska Arkansas Georgia Iowa Kentucky Louisiana Michigan Montana New Hampshire North Carolina South Dakota West Virginia[/color] 2015 Governor Kentucky Louisiana 2016 Governor Delaware Missouri Montana North Carolina Washington West Virginia 2016 Senate Arizona Colorado Florida Illinois Kentucky Louisiana Missouri Nevada New Hampshire North Dakota Ohio Pennsylvania Wisconsin 2017 Governor New Jersey Virginia (Depends on who wins this year) 2018 Governor None (Depends on who wins in 2014) 2018 Senate Arizona Florida Indiana Maine (For both parties) Massachusetts Michigan Missouri Montana Nebraska New Mexico North Dakota Ohio Virginia West Virginia Wisconsin Conclusion: 2014 could be a good year for Republicans in the Senate but for either party for Governors; 2016 should be good for Democrats for Senate and Republicans for Governors; 2018 should be good for Republicans for Senate. Looks okay, except you might want to add Connecticut and Massachusetts to 2014 Gov seats your party's targeting. Malloy has mediocre approvals, and Democrats might be running Martha f()ing Coakley again in MA. For Senate that year NH is likely out of the question, given how hard of a time the Republicans are having finding candidates. 2015/2016 looks good. Maybe I'd put Iowa in there if Grassley leaves and take out Delaware (Castle seems to be the only one who's able to win, and Beau Biden is waiting in the wings). ND won't be targeted at all either. Hoeven was more popular than Jesus Christ when he left for the Senate, and I don't assume that's changed. We've got a better chance at picking up Utah or Wyoming than North Dakota. For 2017 I'd definitely put both down. Virginia only lets its governors serve for one term, and New Jersey's going to be heavily targeted by Democrats whether Guadagno takes over or not. 2018 I'd switch out Nebraska for Nevada and take off MA. Warren is a good fit for the state and it was reasonably difficult for Democrats to beat Fischer without incumbency. Nevada's trending Atlas red though. Hell, even New Jersey could find its way on here. Title: Re: Opposite Party Targets 2013-2018 (SEN and GOV) Post by: Maxwell on August 14, 2013, 10:13:16 PM Only quibble: Pubs would target Bennet and Reid in '16, especially if Gardner/Sandoval can be recruited. If Bennett and Reid couldn't be beaten in a year like 2010, they won't lose in a Presidential year. Neither of those states are getting any easier for Republicans. I get you on Bennet, but Reid faced an awful candidate. If Governor Sandoval runs, I find it hard to believe Reid would win re-election. Other than Sandoval, though, Nevada's bench looks not too great. Title: Re: Opposite Party Targets 2013-2018 (SEN and GOV) Post by: Orser67 on August 15, 2013, 11:35:42 AM Taking into account potential retirements
2016 Senate 1st Tier: Kirk (IL) Johnson (WI) Toomey (PA) Portman (OH) Ayotte (NH) Rubio (FL) Bennet (CO) Reid (NV) 2nd Tier: McCain (AZ) Grassley (IA) Isakson (GA) Coats (IN) Paul (KY) Vitter (LA) Blunt (MO) Burr (NC) Thune (SD) Murray (WA) 2018 Senate 1st Tier: Heller (NV) Donnelly (IN) McCaskill (MO) Tester (MT) Heitkamp (ND) Baldwin (WI) Manchin (WV) 2nd Tier: Flake (AZ) Cruz (TX) Nelson (FL) Stabenow (MI) King (ME) Klobuchar (MN) Heinrich (NM) Brown (OH) Casey (PA) Kaine (VA) Murphy (CT) Title: Re: Opposite Party Targets 2013-2018 (SEN and GOV) Post by: hopper on August 15, 2013, 12:43:37 PM Only quibble: Pubs would target Bennet and Reid in '16, especially if Gardner/Sandoval can be recruited. If Bennett and Reid couldn't be beaten in a year like 2010, they won't lose in a Presidential year. Neither of those states are getting any easier for Republicans. I get you on Bennet, but Reid faced an awful candidate. If Governor Sandoval runs, I find it hard to believe Reid would win re-election. Other than Sandoval, though, Nevada's bench looks not too great. Title: Re: Opposite Party Targets 2013-2018 (SEN and GOV) Post by: PolitiJunkie on August 15, 2013, 03:05:45 PM Only quibble: Pubs would target Bennet and Reid in '16, especially if Gardner/Sandoval can be recruited. If Bennett and Reid couldn't be beaten in a year like 2010, they won't lose in a Presidential year. Neither of those states are getting any easier for Republicans. I get you on Bennet, but Reid faced an awful candidate. If Governor Sandoval runs, I find it hard to believe Reid would win re-election. Other than Sandoval, though, Nevada's bench looks not too great. Agreed, likeliest bet is that in 2016, Reid retires and Cortez-Masto wins the open seat. I don't really see Sandoval running for Senate in 2016. Title: Re: Opposite Party Targets 2013-2018 (SEN and GOV) Post by: publicunofficial on August 15, 2013, 03:20:49 PM 2013 Governor
Virginia 2014 Governor Arizona Arkansas Colorado Connecticut Florida Illinois Maine Michigan Ohio Pennsylvania South Carolina 2015 Governor Kentucky Louisiana 2016 Governor Indiana Missouri Montana North Carolina West Virginia 2017 Governor New Jersey Virginia 2018 Governor ??? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *=Possible Retirement 2014 Senate Alaska Arkansas Georgia Iowa Kentucky Louisiana Michigan Montana South Dakota West Virginia 2016 Senate Arizona* Colorado Florida* Illinois Iowa* Kentucky* Nevada* New Hampshire North Carolina Ohio Pennsylvania Wisconsin 2018 Senate Arizona Florida* Indiana Maine* Missouri Montana Nevada North Dakota Ohio Pennsylvania Virginia West Virginia* Wisconsin Title: Re: Opposite Party Targets 2013-2018 (SEN and GOV) Post by: Mr.Phips on August 15, 2013, 04:05:40 PM Only quibble: Pubs would target Bennet and Reid in '16, especially if Gardner/Sandoval can be recruited. If Bennett and Reid couldn't be beaten in a year like 2010, they won't lose in a Presidential year. Neither of those states are getting any easier for Republicans. I get you on Bennet, but Reid faced an awful candidate. If Governor Sandoval runs, I find it hard to believe Reid would win re-election. Other than Sandoval, though, Nevada's bench looks not too great. Sandoval is probably the only Republican who could win that seat and even then, it would be very close in a Presidential year. Title: Re: Opposite Party Targets 2013-2018 (SEN and GOV) Post by: hopper on August 16, 2013, 12:30:43 AM The R's almost had Reid beat in 1998. He only beat John Ensign by 400 votes that year. Reid being pro-life and pro-gun may have saved him that year. NV was still Moderately Republican back then. It wasn't a battleground state back then.
Title: Re: Opposite Party Targets 2013-2018 (SEN and GOV) Post by: Mr.Phips on August 16, 2013, 02:51:32 PM The R's almost had Reid beat in 1998. He only beat John Ensign by 400 votes that year. Reid being pro-life and pro-gun may have saved him that year. NV was still Moderately Republican back then. It wasn't a battleground state back then. Yeah, Nevada was more like how Arizona is now back in 1998. |