Talk Elections

Atlas Fantasy Elections => Atlas Fantasy Government => Topic started by: Gabu on May 29, 2005, 04:45:13 PM



Title: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Gabu on May 29, 2005, 04:45:13 PM
As introduced by Sen. MasterJedi:

2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill

I.   The commonwealths of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands are hereby the 51st state of the union of the Atlasia with the name of Puerto Rico.
II.   The Senate shall vote on which region/district Puerto Rico shall be designated into.
III.   The State of Puerto Rico shall be given full rights from whichever district/region it’s placed into and be under full jurisdiction of the Atlasian constitution.


I hereby open debate on this bill.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: MasterJedi on May 29, 2005, 04:47:54 PM
Does anybody really need to ask me where I stand on this bill? :P


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Colin on May 29, 2005, 04:48:26 PM
Well if this is to pass I would rather see the Virgin Islands remain a territory and not lumped in with Puerto Rico since they are very different culturally and linguistically and would probably not work well together if they were one state.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: MasterJedi on May 29, 2005, 04:49:04 PM
Well if this is to pass I would rather see the Virgin Islands remain a territory and not lumped in with Puerto Rico since they are very different culturally and linguistically and would probably not work well together if they were one state.

If that needs to happen for this bill to pass I would vote for the change.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Gabu on May 29, 2005, 04:49:39 PM
Personally, I support this bill, although I agree with Colin Wixted's idea.  I also think it might be a good idea to say that this will only come into force after those from Puerto Rico approve of it, although simulating that when we have no one from Puerto Rico might be kind of hard.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Sam Spade on May 29, 2005, 04:54:50 PM
I oppose this bill and my feelings on this stuff are well-known. 

But if its admitted, I will vote for it to join the Southeast.  :)


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: 12th Doctor on May 29, 2005, 05:02:30 PM
I oppose this bill, so long as the Virgin Islands are in it.  Having been to both places, I can say that Puerto Rico and the VI are quite different from one another.  It would be like puting PA and New Jersey together.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Joe Republic on May 29, 2005, 05:04:11 PM
Is there any way we can add Puerto Rico to Dave's map generator?  Just so that we can still make accurate maps and stuff.  If not, I have my own custom maps that people can use if they want.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Gabu on May 29, 2005, 05:05:46 PM
As nobody really seems to support the Virgin Islands being included, I introduce this amendment:

Section I is hereby stricken and replaced with the following:

I.   The commonwealth of Puerto Rico is hereby the 51st state of the union of Atlasia under the name of Puerto Rico.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Emsworth on May 29, 2005, 05:09:15 PM
I'm sorry to interfere, but wouldn't it be simpler if, instead of holding a separate vote on the matter, the region designation is determined by bill itself?


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Colin on May 29, 2005, 05:09:20 PM
As nobody really seems to support the Virgin Islands being included, I introduce this amendment:

Section I is hereby stricken and replaced with the following:

I.   The commonwealth of Puerto Rico is hereby the 51st state of the union of the Atlasia under the name of Puerto Rico.


See no problems here.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: KEmperor on May 29, 2005, 05:10:13 PM
We had a similar bill several sessions ago.  It was an idiotic idea then, and it's an idiotic idea now.  Main reason?  We don't HAVE anyone from Puerto Rico on the forum!


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Joe Republic on May 29, 2005, 05:12:31 PM
We had a similar bill several sessions ago.  It was an idiotic idea then, and it's an idiotic idea now.  Main reason?  We don't HAVE anyone from Puerto Rico on the forum!

We don't have anybody from Utah either.  I think if Puerto Rico was a state in Atlasia, I'd be tempted to move there.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Colin on May 29, 2005, 05:13:55 PM
We had a similar bill several sessions ago.  It was an idiotic idea then, and it's an idiotic idea now.  Main reason?  We don't HAVE anyone from Puerto Rico on the forum!

We don't have anybody from Utah either.  I think if Puerto Rico was a state in Atlasia, I'd be tempted to move there.

We have people registered in Utah though. I would rather do something like have the GM make up some sort of referendum numbers, so we can say that we held a referendum, in Puerto Rico, since nobody is in Puerto Rico at this time.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Gabu on May 29, 2005, 05:14:16 PM
Is there any way we can add Puerto Rico to Dave's map generator?  Just so that we can still make accurate maps and stuff.  If not, I have my own custom maps that people can use if they want.

Actually, yes, there is.  I'm not sure if this is supposed to be a secret or not, but in the URL of the image produced by the EV Calculator, if you change the date to "2008" and then add a bit at the end that says "&PR=x;y;z" where x, y, and z are the winning party, the number of EVs, and the winning percentage, respectively, Puerto Rico is displayed on the map.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Sam Spade on May 29, 2005, 05:18:28 PM
As for practical realities, a good argument could be made that the Senate does not have the power to do this sort of thing under this Constitution and this bill could well face court challenge.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Gabu on May 29, 2005, 05:19:36 PM
As for practical realities, a good argument could be made that the Senate does not have the power to do this sort of thing under this Constitution and this bill could well face court challenge.

What would be the relevant sections of the Constitution to make that challenge?


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Sam Spade on May 29, 2005, 05:22:43 PM
As for practical realities, a good argument could be made that the Senate does not have the power to do this sort of thing under this Constitution and this bill could well face court challenge.

What would be the relevant sections of the Constitution to make that challenge?
I'm sorry, I misread the Constitution.  It does have the power to do this in the Powers of the Senate.  Apologies.  :)


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Gabu on May 29, 2005, 05:26:24 PM
As for practical realities, a good argument could be made that the Senate does not have the power to do this sort of thing under this Constitution and this bill could well face court challenge.

What would be the relevant sections of the Constitution to make that challenge?
I'm sorry, I misread the Constitution.  It does have the power to do this in the Powers of the Senate.  Apologies.  :)

Ah, okay.  I thought that was the case, but I figured I'd just make sure I wasn't missing something.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Joe Republic on May 29, 2005, 05:50:14 PM
Sorry for (kind of) spamming the thread, but I just wanted to test Gabu's map-jigging trick:

()

... Wow, it works!


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: A18 on May 29, 2005, 05:53:48 PM
Well if this is to pass I would rather see the Virgin Islands remain a territory and not lumped in with Puerto Rico since they are very different culturally and linguistically and would probably not work well together if they were one state.

^ I agree completely with this guy.

The Virgin Islands should remain a territory, or better yet, be given independence. They should never become a state.

Puerto Rico, on the other hand, is very American, and should be a state.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: King on May 29, 2005, 07:47:48 PM
I would rather support making all U.S. territories into registrable-Atlasian territories (which only vote for President) that will become states only if the registered voters of the territory wish to.  Those voters will also get to choose which region to join and what state they wish to be congruent to for redistricting.

That would, however, require this becoming a constitutional amendment.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: DanielX on May 29, 2005, 08:11:56 PM
Sounds good. Are there any Atlasian Puerto Ricans willing to vote, though?


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: jokerman on May 29, 2005, 09:21:06 PM
Altough I'd rather not see the Virgin islands grouped in with Puerto Rico, I give full support to the admission of Puerto Rico as the 51st state. 


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: King on May 29, 2005, 10:17:04 PM
I still support us changing this to a constitutional amendment with this policy:

I would rather support making all U.S. territories into registrable-Atlasian territories (which only vote for President) that will become states only if the registered voters of the territory wish to.  Those voters will also get to choose which region to join and what state they wish to be congruent to for redistricting.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: MAS117 on May 29, 2005, 11:42:23 PM
This bill is utterly stupid with the VI in it. Unless this bill is amended to read that the Puerto Ricans vote for statehood I intend to vote nay and filibuster this bill. I will not have this Senate force statehood on a island that has voted NO for statehood over 3 times in the past. And if they voted "None of the Above" that's still NO Sen. Jedi.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Sam Spade on May 29, 2005, 11:49:05 PM
I agree with my colleague MAS on this, 100%.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: 12th Doctor on May 30, 2005, 12:00:09 AM
We had a similar bill several sessions ago.  It was an idiotic idea then, and it's an idiotic idea now.  Main reason?  We don't HAVE anyone from Puerto Rico on the forum!

We don't have anyone from Utah either.  Not that I am all for this idea, but I don't think it hurts us by adding this.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: MAS117 on May 30, 2005, 12:04:42 AM
We had a similar bill several sessions ago.  It was an idiotic idea then, and it's an idiotic idea now.  Main reason?  We don't HAVE anyone from Puerto Rico on the forum!

We don't have anyone from Utah either.  Not that I am all for this idea, but I don't think it hurts us by adding this.

As is, you are FORCING statehood on Puerto Rico.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Gabu on May 30, 2005, 12:26:54 AM
As there appears to be no debate on my amendment, I hereby call a vote:

Section I is hereby stricken and replaced with the following:

I.   The commonwealth of Puerto Rico is hereby the 51st state of the union of Atlasia under the name of Puerto Rico.


All senators in favor, vote "aye"; all against, vote "nay".

---

Aye.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: MAS117 on May 30, 2005, 12:30:26 AM
Aye


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Sam Spade on May 30, 2005, 12:31:23 AM
Aye to the amendment.  We might as well get rid of something.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: King on May 30, 2005, 01:24:27 AM
Aye.

I also propose this filibuster amendment to beat MAS:

Every accurance of the letter "a" shall be changed to "å."



Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Gabu on May 30, 2005, 01:30:22 AM
Aye.

I also propose this filibuster amendment to beat MAS:

Every accurance of the letter "a" shall be changed to "å."



I support this amendment, as "accurance" is not a word, and thus this amendment will be completely ineffectual. :)


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Alcon on May 30, 2005, 01:39:09 AM
Someone should propose an amendment to make "accurance" a word. ;)


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Gabu on May 30, 2005, 05:03:51 AM
I'm sorry to interfere, but wouldn't it be simpler if, instead of holding a separate vote on the matter, the region designation is determined by bill itself?

As this comment appears to have been completely ignored, I'll address it.

The main reason why I personally like it in its current form is because the question of "Should Puerto Rico become a state?" is entirely different than the question of "What region should Puerto Rico be located in?"  If this bill both declared that Puerto Rico is made into a state and declared what region it would reside in, there would be a much higher chance of it failing purely because senators didn't like the region it was being put in, not because they didn't like the idea of Puerto Rico being a state.

When the two votes are separated, it allows us to first settle the issue of whether or not Puerto Rico should be a state at all, and then we can settle the issue of where it should go, without the fear that a location suggestion could torpedo its entire admission into the Union.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: MasterJedi on May 30, 2005, 07:01:28 AM
Aye on the amendment.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: DanielX on May 30, 2005, 08:35:39 AM
Aye to the amendment.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: jokerman on May 30, 2005, 09:05:23 AM
Aye


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: 12th Doctor on May 30, 2005, 11:46:37 AM
Aye


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: MasterJedi on May 30, 2005, 11:48:04 AM
Well this has defintily passed now. I hope the Senators who wouldn't have voted for it with the VI in the bill will now be able to commit their vote.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: JohnFKennedy on May 30, 2005, 11:57:45 AM
We had a similar bill several sessions ago.  It was an idiotic idea then, and it's an idiotic idea now.  Main reason?  We don't HAVE anyone from Puerto Rico on the forum!

We don't have anybody from Utah either.  I think if Puerto Rico was a state in Atlasia, I'd be tempted to move there.

We have people registered in Utah though. I would rather do something like have the GM make up some sort of referendum numbers, so we can say that we held a referendum, in Puerto Rico, since nobody is in Puerto Rico at this time.

I am sure a past GM did that, or something similar at the least upon my request. IIRC Statehood lost.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: MAS117 on May 30, 2005, 12:07:10 PM
Mr. President, I submit a amendment to the clerk's desk regarding the 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill:

Clause I is hereby stricken and replaced with:

I. After a majority vote of the citizens of Puerto Rico voting in the affirmative for statehood in a referendum administered by the territorial government of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is hereby entered in the Union of Atlasia as the 51st state under the name of Puerto Rico.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: MasterJedi on May 30, 2005, 12:16:56 PM
Mr. President, I submit a amendment to the clerk's desk regarding the 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill:

Clause I is hereby stricken and replaced with:

I. After a majority vote of the citizens of Puerto Rico voting in the affirmative for statehood in a referendum administered by the territorial government of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is hereby entered in the Union of Atlasia as the 51st state under the name of Puerto Rico.

I'll likely vote for it because it seems that Mas might give his vote for this bill if it passes.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: jokerman on May 30, 2005, 01:41:11 PM
I think it is somewhat implied that it would need the consent of Puerto Rico, but anyway, if you want the bill to say that, fine.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: MAS117 on May 30, 2005, 01:51:04 PM
I think it is somewhat implied that it would need the consent of Puerto Rico, but anyway, if you want the bill to say that, fine.

No, its not implied Senator. This was why I was against this bill. My amendment is necessary to the passage of this bill, and yes I do want it in words.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: The Duke on May 30, 2005, 02:44:44 PM
Let me register my discomfort with being granted unquestioned authority over how the referendum turns out.  I'm not at all sure that I like the idea of me determining the outcome out of nothing.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: MAS117 on May 30, 2005, 02:56:29 PM
Let me register my discomfort with being granted unquestioned authority over how the referendum turns out.  I'm not at all sure that I like the idea of me determining the outcome out of nothing.

I'm not sure about how the dinamics would work about this at this time.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Colin on May 30, 2005, 04:05:01 PM
Aye on the amendment.


You guys need to start these votes at normal times.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Gabu on May 30, 2005, 04:44:53 PM
With nine votes in favor to none against (I'm assuming that Colin's vote was for the first one), the first amendment has passed.

As for this one:

Every accurance of the letter "a" shall be changed to "å."

...I'm going to ignore it per the Senate Procedural Resolution on Multiple Issue Bills.

And as for MAS':

Clause I is hereby stricken and replaced with:

I. After a majority vote of the citizens of Puerto Rico voting in the affirmative for statehood in a referendum administered by the territorial government of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is hereby entered in the Union of Atlasia as the 51st state under the name of Puerto Rico.

I hereby open voting on this amendment.

All senators in favor, vote "aye"; all against, vote "nay".


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: MasterJedi on May 30, 2005, 04:47:00 PM
Aye on Mas's amendment


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Gabu on May 30, 2005, 04:49:02 PM
Aye.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: King on May 30, 2005, 04:50:04 PM
ASye.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: jokerman on May 30, 2005, 05:46:57 PM
Aye


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Sam Spade on May 30, 2005, 05:53:03 PM
Aye on the Amendment. 

Since I lived in Texas, I know a little about the importance of this amendment.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: MAS117 on May 30, 2005, 06:57:25 PM
Aye


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Gabu on May 30, 2005, 06:59:08 PM
With six votes in favor to none against, this amendment has passed.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Colin on May 30, 2005, 07:09:19 PM
Aye


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: 12th Doctor on May 31, 2005, 12:23:33 AM
Aye


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: DanielX on May 31, 2005, 12:51:26 AM
Aye


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: jokerman on May 31, 2005, 09:45:05 AM
Aye


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: PBrunsel on May 31, 2005, 11:29:51 AM
Aye for the record.

Sorry I missed so many votes, I was in South Dakota having  wondeful time. :)


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: 7,052,770 on May 31, 2005, 11:35:05 AM
Well I'm glad people are more receptive this time :D


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: PBrunsel on May 31, 2005, 11:36:52 AM
Well I'm glad people are more receptive this time :D

I say might as well get rid of something like this Puerto Rico Bill now. :)


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: MasterJedi on May 31, 2005, 06:02:24 PM
If anybody doesn't have any more resignations or would like to continue to debate on this bill I would like to motion for a vote. If someone posts that they would just ignore the motioning. :)


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: jokerman on May 31, 2005, 06:11:53 PM
If anybody doesn't have any more resignations or would like to continue to debate on this bill I would like to motion for a vote. If someone posts that they would just ignore the motioning. :)
I agree, let's have a vote.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Colin on May 31, 2005, 06:26:45 PM
Well I am very leery about this bill. I do not want to force statehood upon those who do not want it. If the Puerto Ricans, in other words the GM, finds themselves in favour of this resolution then I see no reason to vote against it but if the opinions of the Puerto Ricans are not taken into account, again this is GM territory, then I am against this bill.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Gabu on May 31, 2005, 06:51:00 PM
Well I am very leery about this bill. I do not want to force statehood upon those who do not want it. If the Puerto Ricans, in other words the GM, finds themselves in favour of this resolution then I see no reason to vote against it but if the opinions of the Puerto Ricans are not taken into account, again this is GM territory, then I am against this bill.

MAS' amendment that just passed requires a majority of Puerto Ricans to be in favor of statehood for this to come into effect.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Colin on May 31, 2005, 07:04:02 PM
Well I am very leery about this bill. I do not want to force statehood upon those who do not want it. If the Puerto Ricans, in other words the GM, finds themselves in favour of this resolution then I see no reason to vote against it but if the opinions of the Puerto Ricans are not taken into account, again this is GM territory, then I am against this bill.

MAS' amendment that just passed requires a majority of Puerto Ricans to be in favor of statehood for this to come into effect.

I'm guessing that would have to be simulated by the GM for that to take affect then?


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Gabu on May 31, 2005, 07:31:01 PM
Well I am very leery about this bill. I do not want to force statehood upon those who do not want it. If the Puerto Ricans, in other words the GM, finds themselves in favour of this resolution then I see no reason to vote against it but if the opinions of the Puerto Ricans are not taken into account, again this is GM territory, then I am against this bill.

MAS' amendment that just passed requires a majority of Puerto Ricans to be in favor of statehood for this to come into effect.

I'm guessing that would have to be simulated by the GM for that to take affect then?

I'm not really sure how that work work, actually.  Given that no actual Puerto Rican vote for statehood is coming up, it seems to me that having the GM do it would be akin to having the GM just make stuff up.  However, I don't know of any other way of doing it, so I don't know.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: MAS117 on May 31, 2005, 07:34:28 PM
I ask for a vote too.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: MasterJedi on June 01, 2005, 06:39:43 AM
Okay we have three people that want a vote (including me), can we get a vote Gabu or do we have to wait still?


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Gabu on June 01, 2005, 02:52:52 PM
Okay we have three people that want a vote (including me), can we get a vote Gabu or do we have to wait still?

I was mainly waiting to see if Colin Wixted had anything more to say, but it appears he doesn't, so okay, I'll call a vote on this bill.

The bill's final form is as follows:

2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill

I. After a majority vote of the citizens of Puerto Rico voting in the affirmative for statehood in a referendum administered by the territorial government of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is hereby entered in the Union of Atlasia as the 51st state under the name of Puerto Rico.
II.   The Senate shall vote on which region/district Puerto Rico shall be designated into.
III.   The State of Puerto Rico shall be given full rights from whichever district/region it’s placed into and be under full jurisdiction of the Atlasian constitution.


All senators in favor, vote "aye"; all against, vote "nay".


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: MAS117 on June 01, 2005, 02:53:48 PM
Aye


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: jokerman on June 01, 2005, 03:12:58 PM
Aye


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Sam Spade on June 01, 2005, 03:46:16 PM
Aye.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Gabu on June 01, 2005, 03:47:35 PM
Aye.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: PBrunsel on June 01, 2005, 03:55:00 PM
Nay


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: MasterJedi on June 01, 2005, 04:34:03 PM
Aye


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: King on June 01, 2005, 04:40:27 PM
Aye.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Gabu on June 01, 2005, 04:44:18 PM
This bill now has enough votes to pass; senators now have 24 hours to change their vote.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: MasterJedi on June 01, 2005, 04:50:07 PM
So let me see if I have this correctly, if nobody changes their mind on this we have to wait to see how Ford has it play out. And if the Puerto Rican's choose statehood then we start debate on the region to put it in?


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Gabu on June 01, 2005, 04:51:05 PM
So let me see if I have this correctly, if nobody changes their mind on this we have to wait to see how Ford has it play out. And if the Puerto Rican's choose statehood then we start debate on the region to put it in?

Yes, that's correct.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Colin on June 01, 2005, 05:20:58 PM
Aye


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: MAS117 on June 01, 2005, 07:30:51 PM
I say we wait until another referedum from the actual Puerto Rican government rather then leave it to the GM.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: MasterJedi on June 01, 2005, 07:38:31 PM
I say we wait until another referedum from the actual Puerto Rican government rather then leave it to the GM.

That could take years and it wouldn't happen for at least another couple of years. If we waited Atlasia might not be here anymore or we could be waiting forever!


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: MAS117 on June 01, 2005, 08:06:59 PM
I say we wait until another referedum from the actual Puerto Rican government rather then leave it to the GM.

That could take years and it wouldn't happen for at least another couple of years. If we waited Atlasia might not be here anymore or we could be waiting forever!

:)


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: DanielX on June 01, 2005, 09:37:32 PM
Aye


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Gabu on June 01, 2005, 09:39:45 PM
I say we wait until another referedum from the actual Puerto Rican government rather then leave it to the GM.

That could take years and it wouldn't happen for at least another couple of years. If we waited Atlasia might not be here anymore or we could be waiting forever!

:)

Oh, no, you don't. :P


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Sam Spade on June 01, 2005, 09:54:04 PM
I say we wait until another referedum from the actual Puerto Rican government rather then leave it to the GM.

That could take years and it wouldn't happen for at least another couple of years. If we waited Atlasia might not be here anymore or we could be waiting forever!

Just as my minor legal observation of this whole bill and everything:

Since there is no part of this bill that specifically calls immediately for a referendum on statehood by the people of Puerto Rico, no referendum can legally be called right now by anyone.

That's how the courts will call it; that's how it will be interpreted legally.

Once again, I will continue to advise everyone to read what you vote for before you vote.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Nation on June 02, 2005, 12:55:36 PM
Well I'm glad people are more receptive this time :D

Blah. Well, it is an entirely different Senate.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Sam Spade on June 02, 2005, 03:28:03 PM
Well I'm glad people are more receptive this time :D

Blah. Well, it is an entirely different Senate.

Doesn't matter.  As I stated above, nothing will happen will this bill, because it doesn't really specify doing anything.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Sam Spade on June 02, 2005, 06:48:07 PM
Also, it's been 24 hours on this thing.  We can send this to the President.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Gabu on June 02, 2005, 06:52:20 PM
With seven votes in favor to one against, this bill has passed.

I hereby present it to the president for his signature.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Nation on June 03, 2005, 02:19:25 AM
I strongly advise the President to veto this bill. Not that anyone cares what a former Senator has to say, but I might as well try.



Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Bono on June 03, 2005, 03:07:01 AM
I strongly advise the President to veto this bill. Not that anyone cares what a former Senator has to say, but I might as well try.




Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: MasterJedi on June 03, 2005, 06:58:00 AM
I strongly advise the President to sign this bill!


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Ebowed on June 03, 2005, 03:53:40 PM
I strongly advise the President to sign this bill!
But the bill is apparently useless...


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: MasterJedi on June 03, 2005, 03:54:35 PM
I strongly advise the President to sign this bill!
But the bill is apparently useless...

Ford is holding a plebescite on Monday, without this bill it can't happen so yes it needs to be signed. :)


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Gabu on June 03, 2005, 07:26:48 PM
Alcon San Croix

I would like to put down my foot here: I'd rather not see areas being admitted we have no avatars for. Puerto Rico is enough, at least for now. Let's give some time for settling.

Areas we have no avatars for?  I'm pretty sure this is a Puerto Rican avatar:

()


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Gabu on June 03, 2005, 08:08:10 PM
Alcon San Croix

I would like to put down my foot here: I'd rather not see areas being admitted we have no avatars for. Puerto Rico is enough, at least for now. Let's give some time for settling.

Areas we have no avatars for?  I'm pretty sure this is a Puerto Rican avatar:

()

Which is why I signed this. :)

Oh, I thought you were saying "this is the only area without an avatar that I will allow."


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Joe Republic on June 03, 2005, 08:13:36 PM
Can the Senate get started on the next bill please?  :P


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Gabu on June 03, 2005, 08:20:12 PM
Can the Senate get started on the next bill please?  :P

Since the Official Senate Procedural Resolution is now in effect, I need to wait 24 hours after a bill passes or fails before bringing a new one to the floor.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Joe Republic on June 03, 2005, 08:23:39 PM
Ah crap.

Please excuse my impatience, by the way.  If you hadn't already figured, I'm quite keen to get the Secret Ballot Bill to the floor in time for the next federal election.  A week before it would be even better. ;)

Okay I'll shut up now.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Sam Spade on June 03, 2005, 08:26:45 PM
Can the Senate get started on the next bill please?  :P

Since the Official Senate Procedural Resolution is now in effect, I need to wait 24 hours after a bill passes or fails before bringing a new one to the floor.

If you want to, you could start a motion to override the specific clause making you wait 24 hours and with a majority vote, you could introduce something faster. 

It's much easier with a President of the Senate actually serving.  Then you two could just start a new bill by letting us know you wanted to start it.


Title: Re: 2005 Puerto Rican Statehood Bill
Post by: Gabu on June 03, 2005, 08:32:51 PM
If you want to, you could start a motion to override the specific clause making you wait 24 hours and with a majority vote, you could introduce something faster. 

Getting six votes on that would probably take around 24 hours anyway, so I figure I might as well not expend the effort.