Title: 2000: John McCain/Tom Ridge vs Al Gore / Dick Gephard Post by: OSR stands with Israel on September 20, 2016, 06:44:02 PM Who wins and with what map
Title: Re: 2000: John McCain/Tom Ridge vs Al Gore / Dick Gephard Post by: Kingpoleon on September 20, 2016, 09:33:38 PM ()
326: John McCain/Tom Ridge - 50.6% 212: Al Gore/Dick Gephardt - 45.0% Others - 4.4% Gephardt's Midwestern appeal is blunted by suburban areas in Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey. With the GOP ticket on average being more pro-Kyoto Protocol than the Democrats, alongside McCain's unique appeal to suburban and urban areas of Hawaii and Gore/Gephardt being a terrible fit there, flips Hawaii. Title: Re: 2000: John McCain/Tom Ridge vs Al Gore / Dick Gephard Post by: OSR stands with Israel on September 20, 2016, 11:24:59 PM () 326: John McCain/Tom Ridge - 50.6% 212: Al Gore/Dick Gephardt - 45.0% Others - 4.4% Gephardt's Midwestern appeal is blunted by suburban areas in Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey. With the GOP ticket on average being more pro-Kyoto Protocol than the Democrats, alongside McCain's unique appeal to suburban and urban areas of Hawaii and Gore/Gephardt being a terrible fit there, flips Hawaii. Why is minn GOP but not Wisconsin Title: Re: 2000: John McCain/Tom Ridge vs Al Gore / Dick Gephard Post by: OSR stands with Israel on September 20, 2016, 11:27:07 PM () 326: John McCain/Tom Ridge - 50.6% 212: Al Gore/Dick Gephardt - 45.0% Others - 4.4% Gephardt's Midwestern appeal is blunted by suburban areas in Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey. With the GOP ticket on average being more pro-Kyoto Protocol than the Democrats, alongside McCain's unique appeal to suburban and urban areas of Hawaii and Gore/Gephardt being a terrible fit there, flips Hawaii. also why is West Virginia , Tennessee , Arkansas GOP McCain 2000 doesn't seem like a good fit |