Talk Elections

Forum Community => Forum Community => Topic started by: Max Power on July 22, 2005, 11:58:40 PM



Title: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: Max Power on July 22, 2005, 11:58:40 PM
Here's some of his quotes:
as for hugh raping the guy, well, if he's in love with him, i dont think he'll do that. The worst you can do to someone you're in love with, is to force them to love you. but hey, nice try getting him. In my school, there's this dude i know who is gay... you can IM him. his sn is ducttapefairyboy.



with race I agree! but with homosexuality, it's different.

The bible doesn't say "Thou shalt not be black" but it does say "Thou shalt not sleep with mankind as with womankind, it is abomination"
The same Bible passage (Lev. 18) condemns homosexuality also condemns bestiality & incest.

The popinjay King of Sweden - a moral titmouse in the plumage of a peacock, who lives lavishly with his lazy, horny kids on Sweden's largest social security check - is King of Fags, King of Zoophiles, King of Pedophiles, and King of Incestuous Perverts.

()
although the king's daughter is a VERY HOT fine-ass bitch

Sweden had a priest arrested for speaking out against fags.

Doesn’t the bible teach that approving of someone’s sin is worse than the sin itself?
You're right. If you support and/or promote the sin, you are equally guilty. Anyone who supports gay rights is as guilty as the person who commits f****try. both should be halved by the sword.

http://direland.typepad.com/direland/2005/07/iran_executes_2.html

that would be AWESOME if imposed in the American continent! especially Canada.

Consensual gay sex in any way, shape or form should be punishable by death. And opebo should be the executioner.

Quote
Homosexuality is illegal, those charged with love-making are given   a choice of four deathstyles: being hanged, stoned, halved by a sword, or dropped from the highest perch. According to Article 152, if two men not related by blood are discovered naked under one cover without good reason, both will be punished at a judge's discretion. Gay teens (Article 144) are also punished at a judge's discretion. Rubbing one's penis between the thighs without penetration (tafheed) shall be punished by 100 lashes for each offender. This act, known to the English-speaking world as   "frottage" is punishable by death if the "offender" is a non-Moslem.   If frottage is thrice repeated and penalty-lashes have failed to stop such repetitions, upon the fourth "offense" both men will be put to death. According to Article 156, a person who repents and  confesses his gay behavior prior to his identification by four witnesses, may be pardoned. Even kissing "with lust" (Article 155) is forbidden. This bizarre law works to eliminate old Persian male-bonding customs, including common kissing and holding hands in public.

Who is the most intolerant, narrow-minded, islamic terrorist-like snob in the forums?

Richius, NixonNow, Opebo... anyone else?

well, I suggest he turns bisexual.... there'll be more open probabilities for him, instead of being a sole fag.

same here... Fags are filthier than dogs. Non-Human animals do not practice homosexuality like some members of our species do. so trying to mock mating with something incompatible, whether another man, or a duck is equally wrong.

I think Dave Leip should change "freedom" to "frenchdom" on the word filter.

As far as i'm concerned, most fags do not like the military anyways.

well, Fags don't deserve any of that, so why r u complaining?

Women should not belong in politics... they belong in the kitchen!!!

I wear a laced thong w/ chains all over... and a leather bondage suit!

Hitler Should have taken over Irak and Iran... It was retarded of him to even try invade Russia.

Oh No! another nation has fallen! begun, the Fag War has!


He constantly uses the word 'fag' and has relentlessly attacked one of our finest posters, hughento, and has used offensive , violent, and mean language and against him and other members. I say Yes/Yes.


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: Speed of Sound on July 23, 2005, 12:01:22 AM
i voted Yes/No because, while he is a troll, he has done anything wrong enough yet to be deserving of a ban in my opinion. but most certainly is a troll. :P


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: nini2287 on July 23, 2005, 12:02:44 AM
KillerPollo is a definitely a troll, but I think the only way to be banned is to do something beyond extreme.


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: MaC on July 23, 2005, 12:10:55 AM
well, don't be gay, then you don't have to worry about being called a fag :P



Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: Speed of Sound on July 23, 2005, 12:13:43 AM
well, don't be gay, then you don't have to worry about being called a fag :P


youre joking, right?


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: Ebowed on July 23, 2005, 12:18:34 AM
Yes/No


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: Max Power on July 23, 2005, 12:21:50 AM
KillerPollo is a definitely a troll, but I think the only way to be banned is to do something beyond extreme.
Read his first quote.


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: Ebowed on July 23, 2005, 12:29:05 AM
KillerPollo is a definitely a troll, but I think the only way to be banned is to do something beyond extreme.
Read his first quote.
Silly free speech.


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: Alcon on July 23, 2005, 12:30:58 AM
KillerPollo is a definitely a troll, but I think the only way to be banned is to do something beyond extreme.
Read his first quote.
Silly free speech.

Considering the question is whether he is a troll or not, not whether what he is doing is Constitutional, I doubt that matters too much.


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: Jake on July 23, 2005, 12:33:06 AM
He is the extremist right wing opebo and deserves whatever opebo gets.


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: Ebowed on July 23, 2005, 12:33:38 AM
KillerPollo is a definitely a troll, but I think the only way to be banned is to do something beyond extreme.
Read his first quote.
Silly free speech.

Considering the question is whether he is a troll or not, not whether what he is doing is Constitutional, I doubt that matters too much.
It's a reference to something else.  Max Power used free speech as his defense in trying to get Jake to stay out of a caucus on the fantasy forum.


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: Speed of Sound on July 23, 2005, 12:38:41 AM
KillerPollo is a definitely a troll, but I think the only way to be banned is to do something beyond extreme.
Read his first quote.
Silly free speech.

Considering the question is whether he is a troll or not, not whether what he is doing is Constitutional, I doubt that matters too much.
It's a reference to something else.  Max Power used free speech as his defense in trying to get Jake to stay out of a caucus on the fantasy forum.
wow, that really bugged you, didnt Ebowed?


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: Max Power on July 23, 2005, 12:41:41 AM
KillerPollo is a definitely a troll, but I think the only way to be banned is to do something beyond extreme.
Read his first quote.
Silly free speech.

Considering the question is whether he is a troll or not, not whether what he is doing is Constitutional, I doubt that matters too much.
It's a reference to something else.  Max Power used free speech as his defense in trying to get Jake to stay out of a caucus on the fantasy forum.
Stupid Ebowed. I was referring to how you were attacking me for wanting to hold a vote rather then just have Jake join. I wasn't saying something like "Jake can't join because he hates the first amendment" (which I don't believe). I think you owe me an apology.

Yes, I agree with the freedom of speech plank; that is why I do not advocate making it hard for people like Jake to join this caucus.
I put it there because I have a right to free speech.


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: MaC on July 23, 2005, 12:45:02 AM
well, don't be gay, then you don't have to worry about being called a fag :P


youre joking, right?
yeah.  It's sad to see him like this.  When he wants to he can have really good points, but perhaps he's too immature to talk about homosexuality without name calling and such.  Other than that issue, I don't think you should have a problem with him.  (Keep in mind he alreay apologized for the Canada/Mexico thing)-which does show he can be mature at times.


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: Gabu on July 23, 2005, 12:49:11 AM
KillerPollo is a definitely a troll, but I think the only way to be banned is to do something beyond extreme.
Read his first quote.
Silly free speech.

Given that this is a private message board owned and operated by a private citizen, there really is no such thing as free speech here; we're here because Dave is fine with us being here.


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: Speed of Sound on July 23, 2005, 12:51:07 AM
well, don't be gay, then you don't have to worry about being called a fag :P


youre joking, right?
yeah.  It's sad to see him like this.  When he wants to he can have really good points, but perhaps he's too immature to talk about homosexuality without name calling and such.  Other than that issue, I don't think you should have a problem with him.  (Keep in mind he alreay apologized for the Canada/Mexico thing)-which does show he can be mature at times.
not that this has anything to do with what we are discussing, but your new sig is hilarious. :D


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: Ebowed on July 23, 2005, 12:58:11 AM



Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: ?????????? on July 23, 2005, 01:02:21 AM
Option 2.


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: John Dibble on July 23, 2005, 01:10:40 AM
If he's a troll, he's one I can at least get along with pretty easily - just a couple issues make him 'trollish', otherwise he's a normal poster.


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: Ebowed on July 23, 2005, 01:12:55 AM
If he's a troll, he's one I can at least get along with pretty easily - just a couple issues make him 'trollish', otherwise he's a normal poster.
I agree, and in fact it's not the gay insulting that makes me think of him as trollish, but rather the constant anti Canadian stuff.  It's relentless.


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: Gabu on July 23, 2005, 01:32:05 AM
If he's a troll, he's one I can at least get along with pretty easily - just a couple issues make him 'trollish', otherwise he's a normal poster.
I agree, and in fact it's not the gay insulting that makes me think of him as trollish, but rather the constant anti Canadian stuff.  It's relentless.

Oddly enough, I'm not really fazed by it at all.


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: TomC on July 23, 2005, 09:07:00 AM
i voted Yes/No because, while he is a troll, he has done anything wrong enough yet to be deserving of a ban in my opinion. but most certainly is a troll. :P

^^^


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: WalterMitty on July 23, 2005, 09:37:29 AM
if i remember correctl, this casey reese once called me a troll.

now this is just my opinion (for whatever it is worth), the real trolls on the board are the chicken littles who run around calling people trolls.


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: ATFFL on July 23, 2005, 09:40:03 AM
He is the extremist right wing opebo and deserves whatever opebo gets.

Very true.


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: Ebowed on July 23, 2005, 11:12:27 AM
if i remember correctl, this casey reese once called me a troll.
He calls everyone a troll.


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: Bono on July 23, 2005, 11:19:51 AM
He is the extremist right wing opebo and deserves whatever opebo gets.

Very true.

except Killerpolo is not rightwing at all.


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: MaC on July 23, 2005, 11:42:27 AM
the real trolls on the board are the chicken littles who run around calling people trolls.

Mitty, you're my hero for saying that.

If he's a troll, he's one I can at least get along with pretty easily - just a couple issues make him 'trollish', otherwise he's a normal poster.

point I've been trying to make.


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: Max Power on July 23, 2005, 12:21:39 PM
if i remember correctl, this casey reese once called me a troll.
He calls everyone a troll.
My dear Ebowed, I have only called Killerpollo, NixonNow, opebo, Winfield, and Waltermitty trolls. And Waltermitty, you deserved it:

nOT ONLY DO YOU WONT TO KILL BABYS BUT I BET YOU WONT QUEERS TO MARRY TO.

GOD MADE ADAM AND EVEN EVEN NOT ADAM AND STEVE.  ,Y BABTIST PREACHER TOLD ME THAT.

yOU SHOULD GO TO A LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE AND FIND THE lORD!!!111
Even when you're joking, you're still annoying.
[.....]Walter Mitty are the two most annoying posters (who I believe are trolls and aren't being serious).

And that's pretty hypocritical of you, Ebowed.


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: Ebowed on July 23, 2005, 12:26:14 PM
if i remember correctl, this max power once called me a troll.
He calls everyone a troll.
My dear Ebowed, I have only called Killerpollo, NixonNow, opebo, Winfield, and Waltermitty trolls.
Hehe, "only."

And Waltermitty, you deserved it:

nOT ONLY DO YOU WONT TO KILL BABYS BUT I BET YOU WONT QUEERS TO MARRY TO.

GOD MADE ADAM AND EVEN EVEN NOT ADAM AND STEVE.  ,Y BABTIST PREACHER TOLD ME THAT.

yOU SHOULD GO TO A LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE AND FIND THE lORD!!!111
Even when you're joking, you're still annoying.
[.....]Walter Mitty are the two most annoying posters (who I believe are trolls and aren't being serious).

And that's pretty hypocritical of you, Ebowed.
How so?  I never stated WalterMitty was a troll, just annoying.  Though that certain post was most certainly referring to Walter's lame parody of josh22 and other Christian fundamentalists on gay marriage, and my opinion of Walter has somewhat improved since then.  Calling him a troll is a serious charge; calling him annoying is not.


Title: Re: Is Killerpollo a troll?
Post by: afleitch on July 24, 2005, 09:28:17 AM
Yes he is a troll and I have crossed his path too many times recently. His anti-gay rhetoric (most likely a result of being a closet case himself) deeply, deeply offended me to the point that I was considering reporting some of his posts. He is clearly here to antagonise as many people as possible; he is immature, has little grasp of reality or reason and bloody annoying.

Having said that, don't ban him for now. He deserves to be challenged, debated and ridiculed if need be. If not- just ignore the beggar and don't reply to any of his nonsense.