|
Title: governor casey in 92? Post by: WalterMitty on August 06, 2005, 08:46:15 AM since all the democrats now have casey fever, im curious as to how then govenor casey would have fared in the 92 election.
make maps for: bush/quayle vs. casey/gore vs. perot/stockdale Title: Re: governor casey in 92? Post by: Keystone Phil on August 06, 2005, 10:47:28 AM Casey would have done better than Clinton but Perot would have picked up some more support, too.
Title: Re: governor casey in 92? Post by: George W. Hobbes on August 06, 2005, 05:29:48 PM Perot would be the only pro-choice candidate in the race, winning a lot of votes just from that.
Title: Re: governor casey in 92? Post by: Lincoln Republican on August 08, 2005, 09:21:46 PM I'm not so sure that Casey would have had the same charisma or appeal as Clinton had in the '92 election.
HW Bush may very well have been able to hold onto the Presidency had Casey been the Democratic nominee. Clinton was a master politician. Title: Re: governor casey in 92? Post by: nini2287 on August 08, 2005, 10:26:41 PM ()
Casey 42%/349 EV Bush 37%/185 EV Perot 21%/4 EV Title: Re: governor casey in 92? Post by: True Democrat on August 08, 2005, 10:39:20 PM I say a fairly solid Bush win:
() Title: Re: governor casey in 92? Post by: J. J. on August 26, 2005, 07:08:16 PM Clinton was a master politician. Carvell, who ran the Casey, Sr. campaign in 1986, was the master politician. Casey runs stronger as a "traditional Democrat" and does better than Bush. Title: Re: governor casey in 92? Post by: Ben. on August 28, 2005, 04:53:59 AM Clinton was a master politician. Carvell, who ran the Casey, Sr. campaign in 1986, was the master politician. Casey runs stronger as a "traditional Democrat" and does better than Bush. Would Carville still have worked for Casey? Or would he merely have run a good losing campaign for Clinton in the primaries. |