Talk Elections

Election Archive => 2004 U.S. Presidential Election => Topic started by: © tweed on January 15, 2004, 05:08:36 PM



Title: My change of alliances
Post by: © tweed on January 15, 2004, 05:08:36 PM
I have changed my alliance from Dean to edwards, but will support Dean if Edwards falters in Iowa.

()


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: YRABNNRM on January 15, 2004, 05:10:47 PM
I have changed my alliance from Dean to edwards, but will support Dean if Edwards falters in Iowa.

()

Am I the only one that thinks he looks like a Kennedy in that picture?

What brings this change Miami?


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Michael Z on January 15, 2004, 05:12:42 PM
It looks like you're in the same dilemma as me. As I said before, my head says Edwards but my heart says Dean.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: © tweed on January 15, 2004, 05:13:20 PM
Edwards has always been my favorite, really---he reminds me alot of Clinton.  but, I never thought he could win the nomination until now.  He is in a statistical dead heat in Iowa, and if he wins that....Edwards2K4


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: TheWildCard on January 15, 2004, 05:13:24 PM
I have changed my alliance from Dean to edwards, but will support Dean if Edwards falters in Iowa.

()

Am I the only one that thinks he looks like a Kennedy in that picture?

What brings this change Miami?

Hmmm maybe a Kennedy but I think he looks a heck of a lot like Kerry in that photo anyway


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: © tweed on January 15, 2004, 05:13:58 PM
Only his hair looks like Kennedy.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Gustaf on January 15, 2004, 05:14:44 PM
It looks like you're in the same dilemma as me. As I said before, my head says Edwards but my heart says Dean.

I am all for Edwards, I like the guy.  


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: © tweed on January 15, 2004, 05:16:03 PM
Here is the Kucinich Kennedy:

()


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: TheWildCard on January 15, 2004, 05:17:08 PM
ROFL!!!!


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: jravnsbo on January 15, 2004, 05:19:03 PM
just like dean, flip flop Mr chairman? he he


I have changed my alliance from Dean to edwards, but will support Dean if Edwards falters in Iowa.

()


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: © tweed on January 15, 2004, 05:19:08 PM
I love the Kucinich Kennedy picture.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Michael Z on January 15, 2004, 05:19:43 PM
Edwards has always been my favorite, really---he reminds me alot of Clinton.  but, I never thought he could win the nomination until now.  He is in a statistical dead heat in Iowa, and if he wins that....Edwards2K4

In my opinion Edwards has a good chance of beating Bush. The only thing that speaks against him is his inexperience, but then they said the same about JFK. Still, something tells me he'd be more suited as a running mate. Call it a gut feeling.

Anything other than a Dean victory in Iowa would still shock me, regardless of the polls, but let's wait and see.

I'd be very happy to see Edwards as the nominee. (Rhyme unintentional.)


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Gustaf on January 15, 2004, 05:21:28 PM

Forgive my ignorance - what does ROFL stand for?


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: TheWildCard on January 15, 2004, 05:23:46 PM

Rolling On the Floor Laughing


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: MAS117 on January 15, 2004, 05:24:58 PM
thanks everyone for helping me.... i think edwards and besides kerry i would vote for him as my second choice


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: © tweed on January 15, 2004, 05:34:43 PM
That's a big picture, MAS....
Nice to see you got it up.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: MAS117 on January 15, 2004, 05:43:57 PM
thanks... i had a picture of a lapel pin..but it was too big.. so i took the bumper sticker... im trying to find a smaller one.. glad to see that you changed from dean to edwards... i like edwards hes a good guy.. hes my number 2 candidate


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Gustaf on January 15, 2004, 05:46:32 PM
thanks... i had a picture of a lapel pin..but it was too big.. so i took the bumper sticker... im trying to find a smaller one.. glad to see that you changed from dean to edwards... i like edwards hes a good guy.. hes my number 2 candidate

YOU REALLY FINALLY DID IT! Congatulations! :) :) :)


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: © tweed on January 15, 2004, 05:47:26 PM
All fo them probably are good guys.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Lt. Gov. Immy on January 15, 2004, 05:50:34 PM
My support has changed multiple times over the past months.  I orignally supported Kerry, then Edwards, then Karry, then Gephardt, then Dean, then Gephardt again.  Right now I'd like either Dean or Gephardt, but I'd perfer Gephardt.

Luckily (or not) I don't live in an early primary state so I have no say in the matter!


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: MAS117 on January 15, 2004, 05:54:28 PM
personally i would never vote for gephardt for president. how can you elect a man with no personality? i have always supported kerry, but in the very beginning i liked kerry,edwards, and clark... now im a kerry man... but i would without a doubt support edwards for the VP nom...


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Huckleberry Finn on January 15, 2004, 05:54:40 PM
I thought that you're left liberal Miamiu? Doesn't Edwards be too conservative for you?

I also like him. Very charismatic guy and makes Bush seems like old man. Also as a vice president candidate...Edwards vs. Cheney. Edwards would increase to young voters and (with his looks) women support to Democrats. It's pretty  surprising that he is already 50. Looks younger. Personally I believe that Bush won in 2000 because he was more handsome than Gore (So ladies told) It was tight race. There are lot of people who don't understand anything about politics and go to vote nevertheless. I think that there was these few thousand voters in Florida who decided it in that way. Of cource there was several and several groups who decided to vote for bush for several other reasons. Beautycontest-thing was only one.


 


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Gustaf on January 15, 2004, 06:03:49 PM
I thought that you're left liberal Miamiu? Doesn't Edwards be too conservative for you?

I also like him. Very charismatic guy and makes Bush seems like old man. Also as a vice president candidate...Edwards vs. Cheney. Edwards would increase to young voters and (with his looks) women support to Democrats. It's pretty  surprising that he is already 50. Looks younger. Personally I believe that Bush won in 2000 because he was more handsome than Gore (So ladies told) It was tight race. There are lot of people who don't understand anything about politics and go to vote nevertheless. I think that there was these few thousand voters in Florida who decided it in that way. Of cource there was several and several groups who decided to vote for bush for several other reasons. Beautycontest-thing was only one.


 


That's an interesting theory...might well have been true of Kennedy in 1960.

MaimiU is not that far to the left, at least that's what he told us during the election campaign. Btw, Finn, why don't you register to vote in the forum-elections? We need every vote we can get, and we are allowed! :)


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: M on January 15, 2004, 06:08:08 PM
*this poll excludes the two remaining jokers

These are the democrats I wouldn't mind winning if there absolutely had to be a dem president:
Lieberman
Edwards

These are the dems with the worst chances in the gen. electeion:
Dean
Kerry

These are the dems with a decent chance in the gen. election:
Lieberman
Edwards
Clark

So, as you can see, Clark would be in my mind the worst possible outcome of the dem primary. e has a chance of winning if Bush maes mistakes, and he would be a terrible president.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Wakie on January 15, 2004, 10:00:46 PM
My loyalty in this one has been all over the board.  Fortunately the PA primary is a long way off.

I started off looking purely at resumes and supported Kerry.  Then I attended a Dean meetup and switched to him.  After watching several debates I found myself moving towards Edwards.  The other night I attended a John Kerry rally and heard Chris Heinz speak (impressive guy) and now I'm torn somewhere between Kerry & Edwards.

In a perfect world I would get Edwards with Kerry's resume.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home. on January 15, 2004, 10:29:00 PM
So, as you can see, Clark would be in my mind the worst possible outcome of the dem primary. e has a chance of winning if Bush maes mistakes, and he would be a terrible president.

Not after today.  


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: MAS117 on January 15, 2004, 10:41:52 PM
My loyalty in this one has been all over the board.  Fortunately the PA primary is a long way off.

I started off looking purely at resumes and supported Kerry.  Then I attended a Dean meetup and switched to him.  After watching several debates I found myself moving towards Edwards.  The other night I attended a John Kerry rally and heard Chris Heinz speak (impressive guy) and now I'm torn somewhere between Kerry & Edwards.

In a perfect world I would get Edwards with Kerry's resume.


Thats great I vote defiantly vote for a Edwards with kERyys resume


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: CHRISTOPHER MICHAE on January 15, 2004, 10:42:08 PM
I have changed my alliance from Dean to edwards, but will support Dean if Edwards falters in Iowa.

()
I like Edwards too. I will vote for Clark in Michigan's Primary, but my second choice would be Edwards. Thinking of it, Edwards reminds me of Kennedy, of course, but also of Dan Quale in a way, since Quale was a young Senator too, and Edwards is young and a junior Senator.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: MAS117 on January 15, 2004, 11:09:26 PM
its obvious that edwards wont win the nomination... so then why is he not seeking reelection to the senate or a possible vp nom?


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: jravnsbo on January 15, 2004, 11:44:09 PM
Because his senate reelection would be VERY tough.  He is running vs a Popular Rep in Richard Burr that raised 5 million dollars and has been campaigning a year already.

VP, who knows , I think that is his best bet and keeps him alive in 2008.


its obvious that edwards wont win the nomination... so then why is he not seeking reelection to the senate or a possible vp nom?


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: mossy on January 16, 2004, 01:06:45 AM
its obvious that edwards wont win the nomination... so then why is he not seeking reelection to the senate or a possible vp nom?

Never have I seen such a good line-up of Pres. hopefuls....was looking at a list the other day, with their qualifications, and I realized that every one could do a good job, whether as elected or in an emergency.  All presented  as well-grounded, and brought genuine experience.  No wonder people have a hard time choosing--they're good.  Al Sharpton was good, too, sharp as a tack (couldn't resist) and this is the first chance I've had to hear him speak.  I doubt we'll ever see such a broad, qualified field like this again.   Bush must have brought out even the most reluctant......

BTW, I'm started reading O'Neill's book, and Bush doesn't sound very affable at all, and would be impossible to like on even a personal level.--a spoiled jerk, that doesn't seem to track.......in fact, he gives people nicknames so he can put them down.   But I'm biased.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Gustaf on January 16, 2004, 06:02:49 AM
I have changed my alliance from Dean to edwards, but will support Dean if Edwards falters in Iowa.

()
I like Edwards too. I will vote for Clark in Michigan's Primary, but my second choice would be Edwards. Thinking of it, Edwards reminds me of Kennedy, of course, but also of Dan Quale in a way, since Quale was a young Senator too, and Edwards is young and a junior Senator.

Have you read about Clark's flip-flops on Iraq? And also, what's this I hear about his abortion stands, they seemed a little extreme, but I haven't understood it all yet.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: © tweed on January 16, 2004, 08:07:41 AM
I thought that you're left liberal Miamiu? Doesn't Edwards be too conservative for you?
Is he to the right of me?  Yes he is.  But all of the major candidates are to the right of me, so that matters very little.

He isn't so conservative that I can't identify with his beliefs.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: NHPolitico on January 16, 2004, 11:25:35 AM
I have changed my alliance from Dean to edwards, but will support Dean if Edwards falters in Iowa.

()

They say Edwards is everyone's second choice. It's interesting how that could play out with undecideds.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on January 16, 2004, 12:25:09 PM
Quote
They say Edwards is everyone's second choice. It's interesting how that could play out with undecideds.

Excellent point. Edwards is a "dark horse" candidate, ie; his % of the vote could go sharply up when the votes are counted.

I support Edwards because:

a) He is the closest ideological match to me of the candidates (ie; economic populist)
b) He seems like a nice guy


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: © tweed on January 16, 2004, 04:05:31 PM
Shut up with the "nice guy" crap.  Who cares if they are nice guys?


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on January 16, 2004, 04:14:24 PM
Swing voters do.
Seriously... it's an advantage for him :)
People like people that appear to be people that would like them.
Look at Lorne Calvert for example.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: © tweed on January 16, 2004, 04:15:30 PM
Who is Lorne Calvert?


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Gustaf on January 16, 2004, 04:21:02 PM

Yeah, who is that? Good point, btw, Al, the nice guy image is a valuable asset and is one of the things that pushed me towards Edwards.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Wakie on January 16, 2004, 04:21:09 PM
Shut up with the "nice guy" crap.  Who cares if they are nice guys?
I think it is another way of saying he's got charisma.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on January 16, 2004, 04:24:34 PM
The Premier of Saskatchwan (NDP) .
He was re-elected last year, despite trailing the Saskatchwan Party by 7% at the start of the election.
One reason for this was that he was seen as "a nice guy", while his opponent was seen as a slippery political operative.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Gustaf on January 16, 2004, 04:26:33 PM
The Premier of Saskatchwan (NDP) .
He was re-elected last year, despite trailing the Saskatchwan Party by 7% at the start of the election.
One reason for this was that he was seen as "a nice guy", while his opponent was seen as a slippery political operative.

Yes, looking professional is always bad. That's what happened in Sweden in the greatest political upset in our history last year.

Btw, RP, don't assume that we know all these obscure politicians that you know about...coz we don't! ;)


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: MAS117 on January 16, 2004, 04:28:14 PM
i care if hes a ncie guy. i want my president to have a good personality.Thats something that people like Gephardt lack, Edwards seems genuine.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Gustaf on January 16, 2004, 04:28:54 PM
i care if hes a ncie guy. i want my president to have a good personality.Thats something that people like Gephardt lack, Edwards seems genuine.

That's right! What about Kerry then? ;)


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: © tweed on January 16, 2004, 04:32:04 PM
i care if hes a ncie guy. i want my president to have a good personality.Thats something that people like Gephardt lack, Edwards seems genuine.

That's right! What about Kerry then? ;)
If you want a likeable candidate, Kerry ain't your guy.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Gustaf on January 16, 2004, 04:40:18 PM
i care if hes a ncie guy. i want my president to have a good personality.Thats something that people like Gephardt lack, Edwards seems genuine.

That's right! What about Kerry then? ;)
If you want a likeable candidate, Kerry ain't your guy.

He has a big Kerry poster on his posts, so I thought it was reasonable to ask... ;)


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: MAS117 on January 16, 2004, 04:46:51 PM
there is others things that i look for in a candidate besides just that, i feel that Kerry is the best qualified,  he might not have the best personality but it suits me good enough... hes the most electable...to the personality if its extreme loser like gephardt well then defiantly not


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Gustaf on January 16, 2004, 04:58:19 PM
there is others things that i look for in a candidate besides just that, i feel that Kerry is the best qualified,  he might not have the best personality but it suits me good enough... hes the most electable...to the personality if its extreme loser like gephardt well then defiantly not

OK, then. Is Kerry really the most electable? I thought Edwards would definitely hold that position.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: MAS117 on January 16, 2004, 05:44:59 PM
im sorry gustaf i meant to me... yes edwards is very electable probably more then kerry in general... but i dont understand y edwards isnt seeking reelection for senate or a poss VP run...


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Gustaf on January 16, 2004, 05:48:18 PM
im sorry gustaf i meant to me... yes edwards is very electable probably more then kerry in general... but i dont understand y edwards isnt seeking reelection for senate or a poss VP run...

Ah, I get it. That's another way of looking at it, I suppose. What I hear of Edwards is that he wouldn't win reelection, so that wasn't an option, and he can't say he wants to be VP, his chances for that might actually improve if he manages a good campaign now.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: MAS117 on January 16, 2004, 07:03:50 PM
thats kinda sad, he cant win reelection to the senate but hes trying to be president...lol...


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: © tweed on January 16, 2004, 07:06:10 PM
Edwards probably wouldn't win senate re-election, and me might as weel keep himself alive with a VP run.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Nation on January 16, 2004, 09:57:20 PM
I'm torn between Dean and Edwards (will probably vote for Dean in primaries) but would absolutely love to see a Dean/Edwards candidacy. Edwards would make a solid presidential or VP nominee, without a doubt.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: MAS117 on January 21, 2004, 05:44:16 PM
who has changed candidates now that we are coming up on NH


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Michael Z on January 21, 2004, 06:25:14 PM
who has changed candidates now that we are coming up on NH

I was rooting for Dean until last week, but the past few days have been a bit of an eye-opener. Now it's either Kerry or Edwards, and I'm not just saying this because they were the top 2 in Iowa. They're the two most electable candidates the primaries have to offer.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: CHRISTOPHER MICHAE on January 21, 2004, 09:14:20 PM
who has changed candidates now that we are coming up on NH

I was rooting for Dean until last week, but the past few days have been a bit of an eye-opener. Now it's either Kerry or Edwards, and I'm not just saying this because they were the top 2 in Iowa. They're the two most electable candidates the primaries have to offer.
I like Edwards more than Kerry. Can you imagine how drawn out a Kerry State of the Union Address would be? The Pundits would fall asleep. And probably the First Lady.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: © tweed on January 22, 2004, 08:08:41 AM
Kerry is the worst speechmaker since....Bill Bradley, the human scarecrow.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: English on January 22, 2004, 08:35:27 AM
I too have changed to Edwards. I found Dean's 'speech' a little embarrasing!


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon on January 22, 2004, 09:27:41 AM
I'm for Bush so maybe I'm biased towards your most un-electable candidate... but I don't see what was so wrong with the speech?  He's just passionate.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Gustaf on January 22, 2004, 01:05:06 PM
I too have changed to Edwards. I found Dean's 'speech' a little embarrasing!

English - if you register before 3 p.m. Eastern time, you can participate in the Atlas Forum Fantasy election and help Nym90 to win. All you have to do is scroll down to the right board and post at the "important voter registration" thread. I don't think you will catch this in time, but I hope you do. We need every vote we can get...


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: jravnsbo on January 22, 2004, 01:07:27 PM
b/c he would have probably gotten beat int he senate run and edwards MAY be running for VP.


im sorry gustaf i meant to me... yes edwards is very electable probably more then kerry in general... but i dont understand y edwards isnt seeking reelection for senate or a poss VP run...


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: © tweed on January 26, 2004, 04:56:04 PM
This Just in:

David Holland, aka Miamiu1027, WILL support John Kerry in the general election if Sen. Kerry is the nominee.  The only major candidate that Mr. Holland says that he is not sure that he would support is Ret. Gen. Wesley Clark, "D"-Arkansas.

He maintains his support for Sen. John Edwards in the Democratic Primary.


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: 7,052,770 on January 26, 2004, 10:50:18 PM
So will you support Bush over Clark?


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: Gustaf on January 27, 2004, 01:09:29 PM
So will you support Bush over Clark?

He's not sure. Or at least, that's what he just said in his post!


Title: Re:My change of alliances
Post by: © tweed on January 27, 2004, 03:36:30 PM
So will you support Bush over Clark?
No.  But I may not support clark either.