|
Title: Rasmussen: Lamont leads in the primary and is tied in the general Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on July 22, 2006, 01:19:49 PM New Poll: Connecticut Senator by Rasmussen on 2006-07-20 (https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/SENATE/2006/polls.php?action=indpoll&id=9200607220)
Summary: D: 40%, I: 40%, R: 13%, U: 0% Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details (http://www.rasmussenreports.com) Title: Re: Rasmussen: Lamont leads in the primary and is tied in the general Post by: Eraserhead on July 22, 2006, 02:35:50 PM Oh yeaaah.
Title: Re: Rasmussen: Lamont leads in the primary and is tied in the general Post by: Alcon on July 22, 2006, 03:01:44 PM Would you mind formatting your polls thusly?
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=42699.0 Title: Re: Rasmussen: Lamont leads in the primary and is tied in the general Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on July 22, 2006, 03:02:35 PM The poll comes out like that when you enter the poll in the database. I have no control on how it is formatted.
Title: Re: Rasmussen: Lamont leads in the primary and is tied in the general Post by: Alcon on July 22, 2006, 03:05:11 PM The poll comes out like that when you enter the poll in the database. I have no control on how it is formatted. No, I mean the subject of the poll here. :) Sorry for the confusion. By the way, my thanks for posting all of these -- I'm glad someone does it, and you certainly have your finger on the pulse of the polls being released. Title: Re: Rasmussen: Lamont leads in the primary and is tied in the general Post by: Boris on July 22, 2006, 03:33:52 PM Wait a second...Something here makes absolutely no sense mathematically. If Lamont is leading Lieberman 51-41 in the primary, how can he be tied with Lieberman in the general? For this to happen, Lamont has to be only trailing by a slight margin among independents and Republicans.
Anyways, if further polls confirm this result, we've got a race going on in CT. Title: Re: Rasmussen: Lamont leads in the primary and is tied in the general Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on July 22, 2006, 05:31:12 PM Lieberman is running as an independent in the general.
Title: Re: Rasmussen: Lamont leads in the primary and is tied in the general Post by: Sam Spade on July 22, 2006, 11:37:34 PM Wait a second...Something here makes absolutely no sense mathematically. If Lamont is leading Lieberman 51-41 in the primary, how can he be tied with Lieberman in the general? For this to happen, Lamont has to be only trailing by a slight margin among independents and Republicans. Or you have a large (most likely, too large) sample of Democrats who will choose to back the party choice regardless of who they support in the primary. Title: Re: Rasmussen: Lamont leads in the primary and is tied in the general Post by: GOP = Terrorists on July 23, 2006, 09:31:47 AM Wait a second...Something here makes absolutely no sense mathematically. You are right. The numbers make no sense. He can win. But dont trust the general election numbers. Title: Re: Rasmussen: Lamont leads in the primary and is tied in the general Post by: minionofmidas on July 23, 2006, 11:21:12 AM Wait a second...Something here makes absolutely no sense mathematically. If Lamont is leading Lieberman 51-41 in the primary, how can he be tied with Lieberman in the general? For this to happen, Lamont has to be only trailing by a slight margin among independents and Republicans. Or you have a large (most likely, too large) sample of Democrats who will choose to back the party choice regardless of who they support in the primary. |