Talk Elections

Go ...

10! you democratic "Hack"

14

3

Bandwidth would be exceeded if i typed the number.

infinite

1

5

4

3

7

To infinity... And beyond!

4

Eh, I'd probably go with a 3. 

6

4

1. He is a freedom fighter.

62

Thank you sir may I have another.

100

101

102

103. :P

104

-105

+ 106

107

108

8

Approximately 2π; rouhly 6.28.

About a 4

1.

And that's probably too high.

1 maybe?

0.0000038943

10

8

1

1

6

900 quadrillion

1, what could be wrong with a green party man?

From what I've read so far, around a 9.

Why am I so hackish?:'(

Anyone who puts Straha's hackishness at anything lower than an 8 is automatically a hack. Plus, what you've posted so far doesn't defend yourself.

4- Sure, he reasons well and looks at the facts, but has a pretty oversimplified view of human nature of being overly objective.

South Park Conservative is a racist who wants to put all latinos in concentration camps then move on to blacks, gays and jews.

A 1. He is a socialist yes but not an idiot.

10

6

3

2

7.999999999999 (hey SPC, I guess I'm a hack! ;) )

7

8

8.1

9.975

Pi * 3

2

How the hell did you know I just had 3 slices of pizza?

Consistency.

4

10

5

0. He is a true freedom fighter.

Is this a joke?

No. Your posts are funny and witty.

10

8.5

Thanks, then.


Cpt.Mikey is a 3 or 4.  A Neo-Conservative military man, but very loyal to the american way.

What makes me so hackish?

5

8

2

4

3

3

<1

1

Moose knows a putrid, awful, incompetent (etc) Republican when he sees one. Every bit as much I can a Democrat of that sort :)

Dave

9.5, as I have often said he should change his name to Democratic Hack. :P

5.

Leaps to 6 or falls to 4 depending on the issue :)

5

Over 9000

0

Good you heeled(skip this post)

3

Maybe a 2

9 (that's a good thing)

11 (that's an even better thing)

10

This is a rather hard one to judge.

A 1 in terms of being anything like a typical Republican, but much higher than that in terms of refusing to support Democrats over Republicans.

3

7 or 8

1

1-2

1.5

1.3

<1

10

1

1

0 I'm not even sure what party he is most of the time

8 - You're not fooling me kiddo.

12; this (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=58167.msg1353804#msg1353804) is the height of hackery.

3

2

Bigger Switzerland hack than GOP hack.

13

15

Yes, let's leave it at that.

2

1 from what I have seen at least.

6

3

7

2

5

6

9

It's beyond metrics.

Just like rating your stupidity? :D

7

4

3

3

4

4

3

2

1

4

2

Well, Alcon can be hackishly independent... :P

2.5

Not really hackish. 3-4.

4

1

1

2

1

2

2

1.5

<1

My computer is spazzing trying to make a number so high

10

Yes, Josh I am huge hack except for the fact that I support more Dems than Reps for the most part

For Josh:
Republican: 9
Democrat: 7
Indy: 5
Leadership Confrence: 10

5

1, great guy who supports person over party from what I can see

5 libertarian hack
0 party hack

I appreciate that, but it isn't true.  I don't think I'm a huge hack, but I'm a hack.


2.  As far as I can see so far.

5?

3

5

4

10.

5

6

Oh, and...

()

2

1.2

1

3.  I can't tell if he is a conservative or a liberal.  Seems like a Guiliani or Richardson voter. A good canary on most issues.

8

0

0.5

4 at the highest.

2

3

1

-2. I liked it better when you were I-AU.

2

5

1.5

Thank you. Change that to -3.

5

2

3.

4

5

Zero so far......good job PiT

1

3. Revised down a lot over time as I got to know him better.

1. He's the ultimate un-hack. He calls the balls and strikes as honestly as he can.

1, for lack of lower.

2

1

for anything not concerning Israel: 1
Israel: 10

:)

2

1

8

0

1, nothing really hackish except for his football dreams (18-1, 18-1, 18-1 :) )

*please don't respond w/4-12 b/c I know :P*

6.72

5.1396385028475921874328374239864023650732065023

∑{1, 2, 3, 4}

Just kidding, more like ∑{1, 2}

0.75

17

3

Only from being an ideological hardliner

0.8

2. Something like that. I find him surprisingly (for his scores) unbiased.

2

6

1

2

He's definitely partisan, but not overly hackish.. i'll say 4 for good measure.

2, not very hackish at all

5

10

4 (UMP hack)

False. I'm a Nouveau Centre hack.

     10. Bonapartist hack. :P

1-2

:D

Skippy.

Fine. Right-wing hack.

---

2.

Partisan, but not a hack.  I guess 1ish

7

2

3

2.

2

I'll downgrade him to 3. 

1.70

1.69

0

6

4.7

1 or 2

1 maybe 2 max......and only because of his Maoist PM score.  ;)

1, though he's usually closer to a 0.

6.5

4

     4.

4.5

3.2388

5

4.5

3¾

off the charts

:P

Pi.

2

7

8

3 (Green hack)

4.75

I am not sure Ben has posted enough of late on policy or predictions, or candidate analysis, to earn a score. But whatever it is, it is lower than it once was no doubt. Maybe a 3.

As the campaign heats up, I suspect most of our hack scores will rise a bit. ;D

2

8.5

Democratic Party: 2-3
Israel: 10 (or the maximum value)

3

3.9

8

5

7

6

3

2

8

7.75

5

7

5

6.777

5

1

1

1, I guess.

2

I'm posting in this thread in order to break the scale. :)

8

He has some reasonable moderate views, but he's a real hack for his party.

5

Impossible to scale.

2

1 or less, assuming the lower numbers mean least hackish.  Franzl is aces!

<1

Used to be a ten, but now is down to an 8 or 7.

10.  10 because he isn't even an original hack, he's a copy-and-paste one.

The null set aka 0

0.5

1

1 [if that]

9

3

3.75

10. He has no actual beliefs and just spouts whatever terrible idea he's heard appeals to dixie whites the most.

Not really true, no.

You go from being a typical liberal to being a 'Moderate Hero'. Enough said.

10

10

definitely not a partisan hack, but he has some hackish traits....but still...overall not really hackish (if that makes sense)

let's say: 3

1.0000000000000001.

1

1

3

0 on politics

10 on football, where it should be, given his (sane) allegiances.

1

"hackish" is not the same thing as party loyalty.

1

8-9ish

6

3.5

He exists not so much on a vertical scale than a diagonal one. Perhaps a cartesian system/political compass is better: In which case 0,0.

Gully is one of the least hackish posters on Atlas, in the traditional "partisan" sense. I'll give him a 2/10, anyway, just because no one is completely free of unfair bias. ;)

8/10 :P

8

has some moderate qualities, but truly meets the defintion of partisan hack, in my opinion.

(no offense, Ronnie :))

1

4

3

1

1

8

1

1

2

10, if only for his sig.

2.5

     1

10

LOL.

9.75

5

10

LOL.  Fezzy is in no way a hack.

9.75 for you.

9

1

     1

2

4

0.91

6

-10

;)

He actually can sometimes be OK when he does not bash conservatives. The fact that he does is why I consider him a hack.

As for px75, 10.

8?

1.

2

2.5