Talk Elections

Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion => Presidential Election Trends => Topic started by: Reaganfan on June 08, 2008, 01:49:27 PM



Title: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on June 08, 2008, 01:49:27 PM
Just for kicks.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on June 08, 2008, 01:51:23 PM
Sen. John McCain (2009-2013)
Sen. Mark Warner (2013-2021) (narrowly def. Gov. Bobby Jindal)
Fmr. Gov. Bobby Jindal (2021-?)

Certainly not certain or anything close, but I think McCain wins and Warner faces Jindal in 2012


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on June 08, 2008, 01:52:35 PM
Barack Obama (D-IL, 2009-2017)
Mark Warner (D-VA, 2017-2021)
Bobby Jindal (R-LA, 2021-2025)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: I spent the winter writing songs about getting better on June 08, 2008, 01:57:18 PM
These threads are absolutely inane and retarded. Ask this in 1992. How many would say the Governor of Arkansas, the current President's son, and either a Chicago community organizer or Senator just involved in the Keating Five? There's a ton of other similar scenarios.

Of course the sheer stupidity of them and the idea that in the 2020s we'll still be dealing with the same people we have today is probably why they appeal so much to people like Naso, DWTL and constine.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on June 08, 2008, 01:58:54 PM
These threads are absolutely inane and retarded.
Well, the expert has chimed in


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: I spent the winter writing songs about getting better on June 08, 2008, 02:03:16 PM
1981:

-the Vice-President
-the former Governor of Arkansas who just lost reelection
-the son of the Vice-President.

1965:

-the former Vice-President
-the new House Minority Leader
-a State Senator from Georgia

etc. etc.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Ronnie on June 08, 2008, 02:46:28 PM
Senator Obama: 2008-2012
Gov. Bobby Jindal: 2013-2020
Senator Mark Warner: 2021-2028


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kevin on June 08, 2008, 03:32:46 PM
Senator Barack Obama(2009-2013)
Governor Bobby Jindal(2013-2021)
?(2021-)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Albus Dumbledore on June 08, 2008, 03:58:06 PM
John McCain, Harold Ford, Bill Richardson


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: exopolitician on June 08, 2008, 04:25:02 PM
People really think Jindal will run for higher office? Odd....I dont really see it happening.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: 7,052,770 on June 08, 2008, 05:07:25 PM
Barack Obama (2009-17)
Mark Warner (2017-25)
Tate Reeves (2025-29)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Lief 🗽 on June 08, 2008, 05:11:06 PM
Barack Obama, 2009-2017
Obama's VP, 2017-2021
Youngish Non-Southern Republican who is currently a state legislator, 2021-2029


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Josh/Devilman88 on June 08, 2008, 10:48:10 PM
Barack Obama(D): 2009-2017
Jim Web(D): 2017-2021 (Obama VP)
Pat McCrory(R): 2021-?? ( Pat McCrory loses the Governor race, in 2014 he runs for the Senate of NC, betting Kay Hagan. He then runs for President of the USA)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Albus Dumbledore on June 08, 2008, 10:57:30 PM
People really think Jindal will run for higher office? Odd....I dont really see it happening.
We can hope he doesn't since the consequences would be truly dire if he were to be elected. Like Huckabee, he belongs to the theocon wing of the GOP.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mr. Morden on June 09, 2008, 12:42:11 AM
These threads are absolutely inane and retarded. Ask this in 1992. How many would say the Governor of Arkansas, the current President's son, and either a Chicago community organizer or Senator just involved in the Keating Five? There's a ton of other similar scenarios.

I think we've had this argument before.  You're right that it's crazy to suggest that anyone can predict for sure who it'll be two presidents from now, and especially not three presidents from now, but there are definitely certain people who we'ver heard of who are more likely than others to be the 45th or even 46th president.  Bill Clinton was already a rising star in the Democratic Party in 1988, so it would hardly be crazy to guess him as one potential future president back then.  It would hardly be crazy to guess George Bush as a potential future president in 1980, or even 1976.  It would hardly be crazy to guess Reagan as a potential future president as far back as the Nixon years.

To be honest, a great many of the things people try to predict on this board are "inane and retarded".  (The idea that one can perfectly predict the percentage margins in every state in the 2008 presidential election is crazy, for example.)  But people do it anyway, just for kicks.  It's not like it's a complete shot in the dark.  I mean, the 45th president of the United States is a lot more likely to be, say, Mark Warner than Herb Kohl.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on June 09, 2008, 09:17:13 AM
These threads are absolutely inane and retarded. Ask this in 1992. How many would say the Governor of Arkansas, the current President's son, and either a Chicago community organizer or Senator just involved in the Keating Five? There's a ton of other similar scenarios.

I think we've had this argument before.  You're right that it's crazy to suggest that anyone can predict for sure who it'll be two presidents from now, and especially not three presidents from now, but there are definitely certain people who we'ver heard of who are more likely than others to be the 45th or even 46th president.  Bill Clinton was already a rising star in the Democratic Party in 1988, so it would hardly be crazy to guess him as one potential future president back then.  It would hardly be crazy to guess George Bush as a potential future president in 1980, or even 1976.  It would hardly be crazy to guess Reagan as a potential future president as far back as the Nixon years.

To be honest, a great many of the things people try to predict on this board are "inane and retarded".  (The idea that one can perfectly predict the percentage margins in every state in the 2008 presidential election is crazy, for example.)  But people do it anyway, just for kicks.  It's not like it's a complete shot in the dark.  I mean, the 45th president of the United States is a lot more likely to be, say, Mark Warner than Herb Kohl.


I like that stuff...where Nixon was a well-known politician in the Leave it to Beaver days of the 50s...and yet his term was set to expire nearly in the 1980s. Talk about a politican who covered time.

Same with Reagan...he was on the political scene for Truman in 1948...only to be President of the United States 40 years later.

If McCain becomes President...and serves two terms...I'll say "When I was 11 years old...McCain was on the political scene...now he's leaving office when I am 28 years old".

I like that stuff.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Iosif is a COTHO on June 09, 2008, 09:58:54 AM
Barack Obama  (2009-2017)
Jim Webb (2017-2025)
Malia Ann Obama (2025-2033)



Yes, I know that's ridicolous before anyone says it. :P


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon on June 09, 2008, 11:31:16 AM
Barack Obama (2009-2012)
State Representative Joy Jamieson (2012-2016)
School Lunch Monitor/Community Organizer Andy Smith (2016-2020)
Maybe someone who is actually qualified for the job? (2020-)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on June 09, 2008, 04:49:01 PM
Barack Obama (2009-2013)
Bobby Jindal (2013-2021)
Sarah Palin (2021-2025)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Albus Dumbledore on June 09, 2008, 05:48:57 PM
Barack Obama (2009-2013)
Bobby Jindal (2013-2021)
Sarah Palin (2021-2025)
I'd say Huckabee is more plausible than Jindal for that time period. Perhaps Huckabee '13-'21 then Jindal after that.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on June 09, 2008, 06:34:28 PM
Barack Obama (2009-2013)
Bobby Jindal (2013-2021)
Sarah Palin (2021-2025)
I'd say Huckabee is more plausible than Jindal for that time period. Perhaps Huckabee '13-'21 then Jindal after that.

Jindal will have a bump from running as McCain's veep and/or speaking at the GOP convention a la Obama


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Albus Dumbledore on June 09, 2008, 07:19:05 PM
The experience issue will doom Jindal though.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on June 09, 2008, 07:49:07 PM
The experience issue will doom Jindal though.

Just like it's dooming Obama?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Albus Dumbledore on June 09, 2008, 08:13:39 PM
Jindal has significantly less experience than Obama hth.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mr. Morden on June 09, 2008, 08:18:05 PM
Jindal has significantly less experience than Obama hth.

Uh....barring some unexpected circumstances, by 2012, Jindal will have served at least a full 4 year term as governor of Louisiana, on top of his 3 years in the House of Representatives.  In what universe is that "significantly less" experience than Obama has now?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Albus Dumbledore on June 09, 2008, 09:00:54 PM
Weird. I was under the impression Jindal's sole experience was being elected recently to governor. Nevermind then.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mr. Morden on June 09, 2008, 09:04:50 PM
Weird. I was under the impression Jindal's sole experience was being elected recently to governor. Nevermind then.

Well it was recent, but we're talking about what his experience will be in 2012, as that's when he'd be running for president in this hypothetical.  By that time, he will surely have had more experience than Barack Obama does in 2008.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Albus Dumbledore on June 09, 2008, 09:05:44 PM
That presumes a nonwhite can win the GOP primaries. Given the rustbelt and Dixie base of the GOP...


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mr. Morden on June 09, 2008, 09:14:08 PM
That presumes a nonwhite can win the GOP primaries. Given the rustbelt and Dixie base of the GOP...

I'm not saying that he can.  The only thing I was taking issue with was "The experience issue will doom Jindal though."

I leave it to Earl to defend the issue of whether Jindal can actually win the GOP nom. in 2012.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Albus Dumbledore on June 09, 2008, 09:36:14 PM
If Jindal can keep in office he'd be a possibility for 2016 or 2020.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Person Man on June 10, 2008, 09:11:19 AM
Funny. I see Jindal as a McGovern-like figure by 2012.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Albus Dumbledore on June 10, 2008, 09:42:24 AM
Funny. I see Jindal as a McGovern-like figure by 2012.
As in loses badly?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Adlai Stevenson on June 10, 2008, 11:22:50 AM
Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) 2009-2017
Governor Sarah Palin (R-AK)/Governor Bobby Jindal (R-LA) 2017-

Beyond that I think its impossible to say anything. 


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Person Man on June 10, 2008, 04:45:20 PM

Well, that, and being basically the ultra-radical who is so conservative that people will question if he really believes in democracy.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on June 11, 2008, 10:08:05 AM
Is Jindal term-limited?  If so I think 2016 or 2020 is about the latest he could think of being elected.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Eraserhead on June 12, 2008, 03:14:13 AM
I find it slightly amusing that almost none of the McCain people here even seem to think he's going to win.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: I spent the winter writing songs about getting better on June 12, 2008, 11:43:05 AM
Aside from my original point:

Why do so many think a Jindal presidency is basically inevitable at some point? Jindal is currently the most right wing Governor in America. Also:

()

Northern Louisiana didn't change radically in 4 years, neither did Jindal's skin color. Simply the political context of the state. And even then Jindal notably underperformed in the area. I don't see anything that makes Jindal so strong of a candidate that there is no way he can be denied the Presidency.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on June 12, 2008, 12:51:03 PM
Aside from my original point:

Why do so many think a Jindal presidency is basically inevitable at some point? Jindal is currently the most right wing Governor in America. Also:

()

Northern Louisiana didn't change radically in 4 years, neither did Jindal's skin color. Simply the political context of the state. And even then Jindal notably underperformed in the area. I don't see anything that makes Jindal so strong of a candidate that there is no way he can be denied the Presidency.
Its not so much that he's a lock for the presidency, he's a good bet for the nomination.  Plus, I don't think people would care if he said "macaca", its kind of like if Obama just started beltin out the N-word, so he's pretty set there.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Spaghetti Cat on June 21, 2008, 09:40:50 PM
I'll do the next five because I feel like it.
Senator John McCain (R-Arizona) (2009-2013)
does not seek reelection
Governor Bobby Jindal (R-LA) (2013-2021)
Vice President Sarah Palin (R-AK) (2021-2029)
Senate Majority Leader Mark Warner (D-VA) (2029-2033)
loses primary
Governor Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) (2033-2037)
loses reelection

or

Senator Barack Obama (D-Ill) (2009-2017)
Vice President Jim Webb (D-VA) (2017-2025)
Governor Tim Ryan (D-OH) (2025-2029)
loses reelection
Senator Norm Coleman (R-MN) (2029-2037)
Senator Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA) (2037-2041)
loses reelection


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Albus Dumbledore on June 21, 2008, 09:46:24 PM
Webb is unelectable.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Governor PiT on June 25, 2008, 07:55:11 PM
McCain: 2008-2012
Warner: 2012-2020
Jindal: 2020-2028


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Josh/Devilman88 on June 27, 2008, 11:57:42 AM
2008:

(
)

Obama: 306
McCain: 232



From here out I will not do EV totals because they will change.

2012

(
)

Obama wins over Romney.



2016

(
)

Sarah Palin(AK) vs Mary Landiren(LA), I don't know who wins, because the EV will be different, but it will be using the 2012 EV map, what every that may be. I may add the EV totals.



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on June 27, 2008, 12:31:19 PM
Palin v. Landrieu?  Do you really the Dems will nominate a moderate who is either out of office or barely winning?  BTW, LOL @ NC, GA, and LA voting Dem


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on June 27, 2008, 01:12:59 PM
Georgia LOL


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Josh/Devilman88 on June 27, 2008, 01:56:23 PM
Palin v. Landrieu?  Do you really the Dems will nominate a moderate who is either out of office or barely winning?  BTW, LOL @ NC, GA, and LA voting Dem

LA did in 1992 and 1996. Also by that time, GA and NC will both have around 10 to 11 million people live in them states, Most from up North moving down because the cost of living is lower and the weather is better.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on June 27, 2008, 02:13:25 PM
Palin v. Landrieu?  Do you really the Dems will nominate a moderate who is either out of office or barely winning?  BTW, LOL @ NC, GA, and LA voting Dem

LA did in 1992 and 1996. Also by that time, GA and NC will both have around 10 to 11 million people live in them states, Most from up North moving down because the cost of living is lower and the weather is better.
1.) VT has voted Republican more times any state, in fact up until 1992, I don't know the last time they didn't.  Is it going to be a GOP bastion soon?
2.) More people does not equal more Democratic, Georgia is growing a lot and is moving right


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Flying Dog on June 27, 2008, 02:18:06 PM
Barack Obama (2009-2017)
Gordon Smith (2017-2021)
Hobo living in a box in downtown saginaw (2021-????)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Josh/Devilman88 on June 27, 2008, 02:39:58 PM
Palin v. Landrieu?  Do you really the Dems will nominate a moderate who is either out of office or barely winning?  BTW, LOL @ NC, GA, and LA voting Dem

LA did in 1992 and 1996. Also by that time, GA and NC will both have around 10 to 11 million people live in them states, Most from up North moving down because the cost of living is lower and the weather is better.
1.) VT has voted Republican more times any state, in fact up until 1992, I don't know the last time they didn't.  Is it going to be a GOP bastion soon?
2.) More people does not equal more Democratic, Georgia is growing a lot and is moving right

GA isn't moving right or left right now, its holding steady, but I see it being more Democratic at the natonal level, but saying republican at the local level. Also  LA would go Democratic because the Mary is from there, and 99% of the time the candidate wins their home state.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on June 27, 2008, 02:41:57 PM
Palin v. Landrieu?  Do you really the Dems will nominate a moderate who is either out of office or barely winning?  BTW, LOL @ NC, GA, and LA voting Dem

LA did in 1992 and 1996. Also by that time, GA and NC will both have around 10 to 11 million people live in them states, Most from up North moving down because the cost of living is lower and the weather is better.
1.) VT has voted Republican more times any state, in fact up until 1992, I don't know the last time they didn't.  Is it going to be a GOP bastion soon?
2.) More people does not equal more Democratic, Georgia is growing a lot and is moving right

GA isn't moving right or left right now, its holding steady, but I see it being more Democratic at the natonal level, but saying republican at the local level. Also  LA would go Democratic because the Mary is from there, and 99% of the time the candidate wins their home state.
1.) No, you can't argue Georgia is not moving to the right, its a fact not an opinion
2.) Al Gore did incredibly well in TN in 2000


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Josh/Devilman88 on June 27, 2008, 02:57:03 PM
Palin v. Landrieu?  Do you really the Dems will nominate a moderate who is either out of office or barely winning?  BTW, LOL @ NC, GA, and LA voting Dem

LA did in 1992 and 1996. Also by that time, GA and NC will both have around 10 to 11 million people live in them states, Most from up North moving down because the cost of living is lower and the weather is better.
1.) VT has voted Republican more times any state, in fact up until 1992, I don't know the last time they didn't.  Is it going to be a GOP bastion soon?
2.) More people does not equal more Democratic, Georgia is growing a lot and is moving right

GA isn't moving right or left right now, its holding steady, but I see it being more Democratic at the natonal level, but saying republican at the local level. Also  LA would go Democratic because the Mary is from there, and 99% of the time the candidate wins their home state.
1.) No, you can't argue Georgia is not moving to the right, its a fact not an opinion
2.) Al Gore did incredibly well in TN in 2000

I said 99% of the time. Also Gore was too liberal for TN when he ran.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on June 27, 2008, 03:30:12 PM
While at least you admitted Georgia is trending Republican.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: SPC on June 27, 2008, 03:41:12 PM
Barack H. Obama (2009-2013)
Mark Sanford (2013-2021)
Rand Paul (2021-2029)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: NDN on June 27, 2008, 03:53:41 PM
McCain: 2008-2012
Warner: 2012-2020
Jindal: 2020-2028
Jindal will be unelectable in a few years, if not already. Otherwise that's not an implausible list.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on June 27, 2008, 04:30:32 PM
Barack H. Obama (2009-2013)
Mark Sanford (2013-2021)
Rand Paul (2021-2029)

IIRC, he's just like his dad. IIRC, his dad failed to win a single state.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on June 27, 2008, 05:10:46 PM
That doesn't mean that Rand Paul couldn't get elected in 12 years, just as Reagan couldn't get elected in 1976 let alone 1968


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: bgwah on June 27, 2008, 05:20:56 PM
lol, Jindal has about a 0.0001% chance of ever becoming President.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: War on Want on June 27, 2008, 06:54:55 PM
Palin v. Landrieu?  Do you really the Dems will nominate a moderate who is either out of office or barely winning?  BTW, LOL @ NC, GA, and LA voting Dem

LA did in 1992 and 1996. Also by that time, GA and NC will both have around 10 to 11 million people live in them states, Most from up North moving down because the cost of living is lower and the weather is better.
1.) VT has voted Republican more times any state, in fact up until 1992, I don't know the last time they didn't.  Is it going to be a GOP bastion soon?
2.) More people does not equal more Democratic, Georgia is growing a lot and is moving right

GA isn't moving right or left right now, its holding steady, but I see it being more Democratic at the natonal level, but saying republican at the local level. Also  LA would go Democratic because the Mary is from there, and 99% of the time the candidate wins their home state.
1.) No, you can't argue Georgia is not moving to the right, its a fact not an opinion

It isn't anymore. Most of the growth to its suburbs recently hasn't been as Republican, as before and I think it is holding steady now.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: War on Want on June 27, 2008, 06:55:22 PM
That doesn't mean that Rand Paul couldn't get elected in 12 years, just as Reagan couldn't get elected in 1976 let alone 1968
Nope because Libertarianism will never be popular enough to allow for it.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: War on Want on June 27, 2008, 06:58:04 PM
Barack Obama(2009-2017)
Sarah Palin(2017-2025)
Pancho Villa from Phoenix, Arizona(2025-2029)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on June 28, 2008, 12:42:09 AM
Pancho Villa from Phoenix, Arizona(2025-2029)

Nice name.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on June 28, 2008, 04:08:17 AM
How about this?

OBAMA 2009-2013
JINDAL 2013-2021
WARNER 2021-2029

With the exception of the four years of Obama....this timeline isn't all that bad as Mark Warner isn't all that extreme a Democrat.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: NDN on June 28, 2008, 04:16:33 AM
Come on Mike, do you really think Americans are going to go for an ultra-conservative Catholic Indian who performs exorcisms?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: HardRCafé on June 28, 2008, 04:31:56 AM
It makes about as much sense as a just elected Chicago pol Teddy Kennedy was still calling "Osama" just yesterday.

And no, that is not a swipe at Obama.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on June 28, 2008, 07:46:46 AM
That doesn't mean that Rand Paul couldn't get elected in 12 years, just as Reagan couldn't get elected in 1976 let alone 1968
Nope because Libertarianism will never be popular enough to allow for it.
Just as conservatism was not popular enough in 1964?  Or just as Democracy was not too popular before the revolution?  Can I have a look into your crystal ball that tells you how America will feel in 10 years?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Albus Dumbledore on June 29, 2008, 09:20:44 AM
McCain
Ford
Kyanka


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: HardRCafé on June 29, 2008, 10:47:03 PM
That doesn't mean that Rand Paul couldn't get elected in 12 years, just as Reagan couldn't get elected in 1976 let alone 1968
Nope because Libertarianism will never be popular enough to allow for it.
Just as conservatism was not popular enough in 1964?  Or just as Democracy was not too popular before the revolution?  Can I have a look into your crystal ball that tells you how America will feel in 10 years?

Because anti-Semitism and hardcore drug abuse are not that rampant here.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: © tweed on July 01, 2008, 12:39:16 AM
just to be interesting since this is stupid

Obama '09-'14 (assassinated)
Webb '14-17
random hispanic Republican state legislator '17-'25


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Albus Dumbledore on July 01, 2008, 09:24:40 AM
Webb isn't going to be veep.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: MasterJedi on July 01, 2008, 04:57:10 PM
Two scenarios:

John McCain 2009-2013
Mark Warner 2013-2021
Bobby Jindal or Sarah Palin 2021-2029


Barack Obama 2009-2013
Bobby Jindal 2013-2021
Who the hell knows 2021- ?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on July 01, 2008, 05:00:52 PM
That doesn't mean that Rand Paul couldn't get elected in 12 years, just as Reagan couldn't get elected in 1976 let alone 1968
Nope because Libertarianism will never be popular enough to allow for it.
Just as conservatism was not popular enough in 1964?  Or just as Democracy was not too popular before the revolution?  Can I have a look into your crystal ball that tells you how America will feel in 10 years?

America will not support an utter lunatic; therefore, Paul will never win.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on July 01, 2008, 10:14:29 PM
That doesn't mean that Rand Paul couldn't get elected in 12 years, just as Reagan couldn't get elected in 1976 let alone 1968
Nope because Libertarianism will never be popular enough to allow for it.
Just as conservatism was not popular enough in 1964?  Or just as Democracy was not too popular before the revolution?  Can I have a look into your crystal ball that tells you how America will feel in 10 years?

America will not support an utter lunatic; therefore, Paul will never win.
Really?  Then how do you explain Barack Obama's rise to power?  Obviously you do not think he will the election if an "utter lunatic" cannot win


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: War on Want on July 01, 2008, 10:44:15 PM
That doesn't mean that Rand Paul couldn't get elected in 12 years, just as Reagan couldn't get elected in 1976 let alone 1968
Nope because Libertarianism will never be popular enough to allow for it.
Just as conservatism was not popular enough in 1964?  Or just as Democracy was not too popular before the revolution?  Can I have a look into your crystal ball that tells you how America will feel in 10 years?

America will not support an utter lunatic; therefore, Paul will never win.
Really?  Then how do you explain Barack Obama's rise to power?  Obviously you do not think he will the election if an "utter lunatic" cannot win
Shut up, I don't care what you think about the man, but 75% of the country thinks that Paul's views are those of a lunatic and at the most 40% of the country thinks Obama's views are those of a lunatic.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: SPC on July 04, 2008, 08:52:48 PM
That doesn't mean that Rand Paul couldn't get elected in 12 years, just as Reagan couldn't get elected in 1976 let alone 1968
Nope because Libertarianism will never be popular enough to allow for it.
Just as conservatism was not popular enough in 1964?  Or just as Democracy was not too popular before the revolution?  Can I have a look into your crystal ball that tells you how America will feel in 10 years?

America will not support an utter lunatic; therefore, Paul will never win.
Really?  Then how do you explain Barack Obama's rise to power?  Obviously you do not think he will the election if an "utter lunatic" cannot win
Shut up, I don't care what you think about the man, but 75% of the country thinks that Paul's views are those of a lunatic and at the most 40% of the country thinks Obama's views are those of a lunatic.

Because the majority's always right, right? (Except for the War in Iraq, global cooling, the Holocaust, eugenics, Communism, the Inquisition, etc.)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: War on Want on July 04, 2008, 09:00:31 PM
That doesn't mean that Rand Paul couldn't get elected in 12 years, just as Reagan couldn't get elected in 1976 let alone 1968
Nope because Libertarianism will never be popular enough to allow for it.
Just as conservatism was not popular enough in 1964?  Or just as Democracy was not too popular before the revolution?  Can I have a look into your crystal ball that tells you how America will feel in 10 years?

America will not support an utter lunatic; therefore, Paul will never win.
Really?  Then how do you explain Barack Obama's rise to power?  Obviously you do not think he will the election if an "utter lunatic" cannot win
Shut up, I don't care what you think about the man, but 75% of the country thinks that Paul's views are those of a lunatic and at the most 40% of the country thinks Obama's views are those of a lunatic.

Because the majority's always right, right? (Except for the War in Iraq, global cooling, the Holocaust, eugenics, Communism, the Inquisition, etc.)
This is about his chances of winning an election not about whether he is right or not.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: MatthewZD on July 05, 2008, 11:26:05 AM
John McCain (2009-2013)
Mark Warner (2013-2021)
Sarah Palin or more likely someone not on the national scene (2021-????)

Barack Obama  (2009-2013)
Mitt Romney (2013-2017)
Mark Warner (2017-2025)

My gut tells me that the next POTUS will be a one-termer, whether it's McCain or Obama.  If it's McCain, it'll be another close election in 2012 with Warner winning against either a very visibly aged McCain or against the VP since McCain has decided not to seek re-election.  Warner is easily re-elected in 2016 and Palin wins a very close election in 2020.

If it's Obama, the GOP is energized behind Romney in 2012, who wins a close election but loses to Warner in 2016.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: TomC on July 05, 2008, 11:29:45 AM
Obama, Santorum, Rahm Emmanuel


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: MarkWarner08 on July 05, 2008, 06:45:18 PM
Obama (2009-2013)
Brad Ellsworth (2013-2047, when he passes away).
Brad Ellsworth, Jr. (2047-2080)

Maybe I should mention that Brad Ellsworth proclaimed himself benevolent dictator in 2013, and ruled the nation with an iron fist till his death 34 years after he assumed office. Under Ellsworth the Magnificent, the America was renamed U.S.E. (the United States of Evansville), and our greatest export was good 'ol conservative values.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Albus Dumbledore on July 05, 2008, 08:01:10 PM
Obama
Romney
Porter


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: MarkWarner08 on July 05, 2008, 09:03:54 PM
Which Porter? Jon Porter?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on July 05, 2008, 09:06:14 PM

Please tell me that isn't Garrison Porter?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: MarkWarner08 on July 05, 2008, 09:44:57 PM
On second thought, my money's on this guy.
()


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on July 06, 2008, 01:31:39 AM

Phil, aren't you supposed to be on vacation in Italy?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Albus Dumbledore on July 06, 2008, 09:42:28 AM

Yes, that Porter.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: I spent the winter writing songs about getting better on July 06, 2008, 01:09:54 PM
If Mark Warner had in any interest in running for President why didn't he this year?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: MarkWarner08 on July 06, 2008, 03:41:31 PM
If Mark Warner had in any interest in running for President why didn't he this year?
How could he have  competed with the Clinton and Obama fundraising juggernauts?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on July 06, 2008, 07:01:21 PM
If Mark Warner had in any interest in running for President why didn't he this year?
How could he have  competed with the Clinton and Obama fundraising juggernauts?

He's independently wealthy.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: I spent the winter writing songs about getting better on July 06, 2008, 07:23:36 PM
If Mark Warner had in any interest in running for President why didn't he this year?
How could he have  competed with the Clinton and Obama fundraising juggernauts?

He took himself out of running before Obama even entered the race.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Spaghetti Cat on July 06, 2008, 09:30:41 PM
Obama (2009-2013)
Brad Ellsworth (2013-2047, when he passes away).
Brad Ellsworth, Jr. (2047-2080)

Maybe I should mention that Brad Ellsworth proclaimed himself benevolent dictator in 2013, and ruled the nation with an iron fist till his death 34 years after he assumed office. Under Ellsworth the Magnificent, the America was renamed U.S.E. (the United States of Evansville), and our greatest export was good 'ol conservative values.
How the hell does Ellsworth get elected in 2012?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: MarkWarner08 on July 06, 2008, 10:15:30 PM
Obama (2009-2013)
Brad Ellsworth (2013-2047, when he passes away).
Brad Ellsworth, Jr. (2047-2080)

Maybe I should mention that Brad Ellsworth proclaimed himself benevolent dictator in 2013, and ruled the nation with an iron fist till his death 34 years after he assumed office. Under Ellsworth the Magnificent, the America was renamed U.S.E. (the United States of Evansville), and our greatest export was good 'ol conservative values.
How the hell does Ellsworth get elected in 2012?
That's least credible part of my satrical historical narrative? Of course, Ellsworth the Magnifcent defeated Obama in the 2012 primaries.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kevin on July 06, 2008, 10:33:11 PM
If Mark Warner had in any interest in running for President why didn't he this year?
How could he have  competed with the Clinton and Obama fundraising juggernauts?

Btw rumor has it tha Hillary blackmailed him out of the race.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: YRABNNRM on July 07, 2008, 08:54:43 AM
If Mark Warner had in any interest in running for President why didn't he this year?
How could he have  competed with the Clinton and Obama fundraising juggernauts?

Btw rumor has it tha Hillary blackmailed him out of the race.

Whose rumor?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Albus Dumbledore on July 09, 2008, 09:09:57 PM
A good website for finding potential GOP hopefuls. (http://tinyurl.com/veepfinder)
Why not try that website for potential veeps/'12 hopefuls??


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on July 12, 2008, 11:21:17 PM
If Mark Warner had in any interest in running for President why didn't he this year?
How could he have  competed with the Clinton and Obama fundraising juggernauts?

Btw rumor has it tha Hillary blackmailed him out of the race.

From where, and with what?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Meeker on July 13, 2008, 03:38:33 PM
Barack Obama (2009 - 2017)
Bill Richardson (2017 - 2019)

Richardson proves to be an ineffectual Commander-in-Chief and allows the country to be overtaken by his arch-nemesis in 2019 - Lord Desk.

()

If only he'd finished the job when he had the chance...


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Person Man on July 17, 2008, 03:03:23 PM

Santorum? ewwww...


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: troosvelt on August 18, 2008, 12:22:01 AM
Well once Obama is elected and proves to be as wonderful as the Obama fanatics suggest, won't he be President for life ? <smirk>


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Daniel Z on October 20, 2008, 10:34:11 PM
2008 Obama/Biden Defeats McCain/Palin
()

2012 Obama/Biden Defeats Romney/Jindal
-note I know EV change
()

2016 Rossi/DeMint defeats Giffords/Tester

()

2020 Warner/Sanchez Defeats Rossi/DeMint
()

I think I will stop here


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Workers' Friend on October 22, 2008, 11:30:15 AM
2009 - 2013: Obama/Biden
2013 - 2021: Huckabee/Jindal
2021 - ?: Unsure


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Iosif on October 22, 2008, 03:31:44 PM
This thread is funny.

I would just like to say that Bobby Jindal will never be elected President. Never.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Daniel Z on October 22, 2008, 09:58:37 PM
 
Quote
For the First time in history, a woman has one the white house. Sarah Palin, (that's right)
has one the White House.


Dear God no!



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: big bad fab on October 23, 2008, 08:45:43 AM
2009-2013: Obama/Biden         McCain-Palin
2013-2017: Obama/Bayh          Romney/Crist
2017-2020: Warner/Herseth     Jindal/Petraeus   (Warner dies from a heart attack)
2020-2021: Herseth/Richardson
2021-2025: Jindal/Thune           Herseth/Richardson
2025- ? :     Clinton/Schweitzer  Jindal/Thune
(yep, Chelsea.... the Clintons avenged, at last...)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Horus on October 23, 2008, 10:58:52 AM
2009 - 2017: Senator Barack Obama/Senator Joe Biden
2017 - 2021: Governor Dino Rossi/Senator John Thune
2021 - 2025: Governor Stephanie Herseth/Senator Jared Polis


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mr. Morden on October 25, 2008, 05:20:58 PM
If Mark Warner had in any interest in running for President why didn't he this year?
How could he have  competed with the Clinton and Obama fundraising juggernauts?

Btw rumor has it tha Hillary blackmailed him out of the race.

Whose rumor?

Sam Spade's.  Apparently, it's "obvious" that someone has some dirt on Warner, and that this was apparent "from the first time Sam saw the guy", or some such thing.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: BM on October 25, 2008, 10:02:01 PM
LOL @ the map with every state going to Warner.

There is something weird about him, I must say.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 25, 2008, 10:15:20 PM
The Mark Warner love on this forum almost rivals that of Barack Obama.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on October 25, 2008, 10:26:53 PM
The Mark Warner love on this forum almost rivals that of Barack Obama.

Yeah, and at least Warner deserves it.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 26, 2008, 01:28:47 AM
The Mark Warner love on this forum almost rivals that of Barack Obama.

Yeah, and at least Warner deserves it.

LOL.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on October 26, 2008, 01:45:57 AM

What?  Warner is more capable, and would make a better President, than Barack Obama.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Dan the Roman on October 26, 2008, 07:16:56 AM
I have a hunch that Obama will win, have a mediocre term, and be vulnerable in 2012. The GOP will respond to this heaven sent opportunity by nominating the one person who could actually lose to an unpopular President: Sarah Palin. Palin runs a nasty and negative campaign, and ends up losing badly.

On the bright side it will open the way for Crist in 2016.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 26, 2008, 11:51:37 AM

What?  Warner is more capable, and would make a better President, than Barack Obama.

LOL.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on October 26, 2008, 11:57:05 AM
On the bright side it will open the way for Crist in 2016.

A Warner v. Crist matchup would be great.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Platypus on October 26, 2008, 11:58:23 AM
Barack Obama, Olympia Snowe, Evan Bayh

Or not :p


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: paul718 on October 27, 2008, 11:05:19 AM
Barack Obama (2009-2013)
Mitt Romney (2013-2021)
Mike Pence (2021-2029)

or in my dreams, at least.


I would consider voting for Mark Warner against say, a populist social-conservative, but I'm not 100% sure where Warner stands economically.  I'm sure that will be fleshed out in his coming Senate term.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on October 27, 2008, 07:12:20 PM

May Heaven have mercy on us all if that awful man ever becomes President.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Workers' Friend on October 27, 2008, 07:16:20 PM
Barack Obama (2009-2013)
Mike Huckabee (2013-2021)
Mike Pence (2021-2029)

or in my dreams, at least.


I would consider voting for Mark Warner against say, a populist social-conservative, but I'm not 100% sure where Warner stands economically.  I'm sure that will be fleshed out in his coming Senate term.

Fixed


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: paul718 on October 28, 2008, 12:04:38 AM
Barack Obama (2009-2013)
Mike Huckabee (2013-2021)
Mike Pence (2021-2029)

or in my dreams, at least.


I would consider voting for Mark Warner against say, a populist social-conservative, but I'm not 100% sure where Warner stands economically.  I'm sure that will be fleshed out in his coming Senate term.

Fixed

nice work! haha

Though Huckabee might have me with the Fair Tax.  I plan on reading Boortz's book in the near future to get a better understanding.

Put it this way...if Warner ran against Sarah Palin and Palin claimed the solution to our economic ills to be more regulation and "putting a stop to the corruption and greed on Wall Street"...then I'd consider voting for Warner


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Person Man on October 30, 2008, 11:35:40 AM
I really have no idea how Huck will give us a fair tax. Does he raise taxes on the rest of us or does he give tax cuts to the fat asses (However, many fat asses don't appear fat because they can afford daily liposuction).  In Wyoming, Cynthia Lummis wants a flat tax by the former. The dawn of the tax-and-spend compassionate conservative, anyone? More solvent but even more statist than their unevolved form, the borrow-and-spend compassionate conservative.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: paul718 on October 30, 2008, 02:26:23 PM
I really have no idea how Huck will give us a fair tax. Does he raise taxes on the rest of us or does he give tax cuts to the fat asses (However, many fat asses don't appear fat because they can afford daily liposuction).  In Wyoming, Cynthia Lummis wants a flat tax by the former. The dawn of the tax-and-spend compassionate conservative, anyone? More solvent but even more statist than their unevolved form, the borrow-and-spend compassionate conservative.

From what I understand, the Fair Tax involves an elimination of ALL federal income tax, with the federal government financed by a consumption tax instead.  I could be wrong on this, I haven't really read into it. 


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 01, 2008, 10:33:08 AM
I forgot what I said before but I'm going with this:

John McCain (2009-2013)
Hillary Clinton (2013-2017)
Christopher Christie (2017-2025)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on November 02, 2008, 12:39:58 PM
I would consider voting for Mark Warner against say, a populist social-conservative, but I'm not 100% sure where Warner stands economically.  I'm sure that will be fleshed out in his coming Senate term.

He's moderately pro-business, and is basically a Blue Dog Democrat on economics.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Workers' Friend on November 02, 2008, 12:59:49 PM
I would consider voting for Mark Warner against say, a populist social-conservative, but I'm not 100% sure where Warner stands economically.  I'm sure that will be fleshed out in his coming Senate term.

He's moderately pro-business, and is basically a Blue Dog Democrat on economics.

Then he wouldn't get my support.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: SPC on November 03, 2008, 12:13:32 AM
updated:

Barack H. Obama (2009-2013)
Sarah L. Palin (2013-2021)
William Lawson (2021-2029)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Workers' Friend on November 03, 2008, 12:21:05 AM
My Update:

Barack Obama/Joseph Biden (2009 - 2013)
Michael Huckabee/ John Thune (2013 - 2021)
John Thune/Mike Pence (2021 - 2025)

I'll do a wishful-thinking McCain one if he somehow wins the election.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on November 03, 2008, 01:00:34 AM
Obama/Biden (2009-2013)
Thune/Romney (2013-2017)
Warner/McCaskill (2017-2025)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Daniel Z on November 05, 2008, 08:55:50 PM
2008 Obama/Biden Defeats McCain/Palin
()

2012 Obama/Biden Defeats Romney/Jindal
-note I know EV change
()

2016 Rossi/DeMint defeats Giffords/Tester

()

2020 Warner/Sanchez Defeats Rossi/DeMint
()

I think I will stop here

Guess I was wrong about Rossi :)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on November 07, 2008, 09:27:52 PM
2009-2017: Barack Obama (D-IL)
2017-2021: Mark R. Warner (D-VA)
2021-2025: Mike Pence (R-IN)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: bhouston79 on November 07, 2008, 09:50:45 PM
Barack Obama       2009 -2017
Kathleen Sebelius 2017-2021
Some yet unheard of Moderate Republican from the Northeast 2021-2029


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: paul718 on November 07, 2008, 10:25:12 PM
2009-2017: Barack Obama (D-IL)
2017-2021: Mark R. Warner (D-VA)
2021-2025: Mike Pence (R-IN)

How come only one term for Warner?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Robespierre's Jaw on November 08, 2008, 04:04:35 PM
44th: Barack Hussien Obama (D) 2009-2017
45th: Brian David Schweitzer (D) 2017-2021
46th: George Prescott Bush (R) 2021-??


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 08, 2008, 04:13:28 PM
Bobby Jindal (2013-2021)
Some little known/unknown Midwestern Dem (2021-2029)
Virtually unknown Southern Republican (2029-2033)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Josh/Devilman88 on November 09, 2008, 10:43:00 AM
Bobby Jindal (2013-2021)
Some little known/unknown Midwestern Dem (2021-2029)
Virtually unknown Southern Republican (2029-2033)

Ok yea sure keep dreaming.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 09, 2008, 08:42:20 PM
Bobby Jindal (2013-2021)
Some little known/unknown Midwestern Dem (2021-2029)
Virtually unknown Southern Republican (2029-2033)

Ok yea sure keep dreaming.
LOL
Keep dreaming?  I didn't even name a person following Jindal


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on November 09, 2008, 08:59:17 PM
Bobby Jindal (2013-2021)
Some little known/unknown Midwestern Dem (2021-2029)
Virtually unknown Southern Republican (2029-2033)

I just don't see Jindal winning in 2012; I think he'd do better in 2016, with 2 terms as Governor under his belt.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: © tweed on November 09, 2008, 09:02:21 PM
Bobby Jindal (2013-2021)
Some little known/unknown Midwestern Dem (2021-2029)
Virtually unknown Southern Republican (2029-2033)

I just don't see Jindal winning in 2012; I think he'd do better in 2016, with 2 terms as Governor under his belt.

I just don't see Obama winning in 2008; I think he'd do better in 2012 or 2016 with as many as 2 terms as Senator under his belt.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: pragmatic liberal on November 09, 2008, 10:16:59 PM
1. Barack Obama (he's not president yet)
2. Someone elected as a big-state governor in 2010 or a senator this year (Kay Hagan, Mark Warner maybe?)
3. Someone who isn't even in politics right now.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Punditty on November 11, 2008, 09:42:01 PM
Barack Obama 2009-2017
Hillary Clinton 20017-2025
Chelsea Clinton 2025-2033


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 12, 2008, 01:20:38 AM
I would consider voting for Mark Warner against say, a populist social-conservative, but I'm not 100% sure where Warner stands economically.  I'm sure that will be fleshed out in his coming Senate term.

He's moderately pro-business, and is basically a Blue Dog Democrat on economics.

So he's a Republican, more or less.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on November 12, 2008, 07:05:39 PM
I would consider voting for Mark Warner against say, a populist social-conservative, but I'm not 100% sure where Warner stands economically.  I'm sure that will be fleshed out in his coming Senate term.

He's moderately pro-business, and is basically a Blue Dog Democrat on economics.

So he's a Republican, more or less.

No; he can govern well.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Nixon in '80 on November 12, 2008, 09:45:30 PM
I would consider voting for Mark Warner against say, a populist social-conservative, but I'm not 100% sure where Warner stands economically.  I'm sure that will be fleshed out in his coming Senate term.

He's moderately pro-business, and is basically a Blue Dog Democrat on economics.

So he's a Republican, more or less.

No; he can govern well.

Well played.

Anyway, just for fun:

1. Barack Obama (2009-2011)
2. Joe Biden (2011-2013)
3. Mark Warner (2013-??)

I'm not implying an Obama assassination to stir up the pot, or based on any animosity I hold towards him, I'm just making my best guess based on the historical drama. Now, poke holes in it.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on November 12, 2008, 10:03:55 PM
I would consider voting for Mark Warner against say, a populist social-conservative, but I'm not 100% sure where Warner stands economically.  I'm sure that will be fleshed out in his coming Senate term.

He's moderately pro-business, and is basically a Blue Dog Democrat on economics.

So he's a Republican, more or less.

No; he can govern well.

Well played.

Anyway, just for fun:

1. Barack Obama (2009-2011)
2. Joe Biden (2011-2013)
3. Mark Warner (2013-??)

I'm not implying an Obama assassination to stir up the pot, or based on any animosity I hold towards him, I'm just making my best guess based on the historical drama. Now, poke holes in it.

If Biden becomes President, he runs for reelection.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mr. Morden on November 12, 2008, 10:41:15 PM
Biden probably is the most likely person to become the 45th president at this point. Not saying that Obama dying in office or resigning is *likely*, but if he does, then of course Biden automatically becomes president.  Whereas, anyone else becoming the 45th president depends on difficult-to-predict election outcomes.  And even if Obama serves a full two terms, I'd say the chances of Biden then running in 2016 at age 73 (same age as Dole in 1996) is not completely negligible.



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Daniel Z on November 12, 2008, 11:09:59 PM
Biden probably is the most likely person to become the 45th president at this point. Not saying that Obama dying in office or resigning is *likely*, but if he does, then of course Biden automatically becomes president.  Whereas, anyone else becoming the 45th president depends on difficult-to-predict election outcomes.  And even if Obama serves a full two terms, I'd say the chances of Biden then running in 2016 at age 73 (same age as Dole in 1996) is not completely negligible.


I agree that there is a good chance Biden could run in 2016. That doesn't necessarily mean he will win the nomination, but he certainly seems to have the ambition to try.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Nixon in '80 on November 12, 2008, 11:54:05 PM
I would consider voting for Mark Warner against say, a populist social-conservative, but I'm not 100% sure where Warner stands economically.  I'm sure that will be fleshed out in his coming Senate term.

He's moderately pro-business, and is basically a Blue Dog Democrat on economics.

So he's a Republican, more or less.

No; he can govern well.

Well played.

Anyway, just for fun:

1. Barack Obama (2009-2011)
2. Joe Biden (2011-2013)
3. Mark Warner (2013-??)

I'm not implying an Obama assassination to stir up the pot, or based on any animosity I hold towards him, I'm just making my best guess based on the historical drama. Now, poke holes in it.

If Biden becomes President, he runs for reelection.

I don't think he could win his party's nomination, even as a sitting President. True, Warner doesn't seem the type to challenge him, but I couldn't think of anyone better.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: paul718 on November 14, 2008, 10:03:27 PM
Has anyone here heard about Mark Begich? The Democratic candidate for the Senate in Alaska? He's 46 and currently Mayor of Anchorage, If he wins, he is currently 811 votes ahead, I could see him as a candidate in 2016.

Why?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Workers' Friend on November 14, 2008, 10:05:46 PM
Has anyone here heard about Mark Begich? The Democratic candidate for the Senate in Alaska? He's 46 and currently Mayor of Anchorage, If he wins, he is currently 811 votes ahead, I could see him as a candidate in 2016.

The only reason he is likely to be Senator is because Stevens is a crook on levels much bigger than Nixon.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Lunar on November 15, 2008, 01:37:08 AM
Has anyone here heard about Mark Begich? The Democratic candidate for the Senate in Alaska? He's 46 and currently Mayor of Anchorage, If he wins, he is currently 811 votes ahead, I could see him as a candidate in 2016.


Maybe in 10 years but I think the lower 48 are getting tired of Alaska, especially Democrats, haha. Gravel/Palin/Stevens


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 19, 2008, 07:47:34 PM
I would consider voting for Mark Warner against say, a populist social-conservative, but I'm not 100% sure where Warner stands economically.  I'm sure that will be fleshed out in his coming Senate term.

He's moderately pro-business, and is basically a Blue Dog Democrat on economics.

So he's a Republican, more or less.

No; he can govern well.

Raising taxes and all was cool, but anyone can break a campaign promise when they're termed out.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Nixon in '80 on November 19, 2008, 09:54:48 PM
Has anyone here heard about Mark Begich? The Democratic candidate for the Senate in Alaska? He's 46 and currently Mayor of Anchorage, If he wins, he is currently 811 votes ahead, I could see him as a candidate in 2016.

From what I've seen of him, he has the charisma of strained peas.

I honestly haven't seen much of him, though.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: BM on November 19, 2008, 11:11:37 PM
Begich was just lucky enough to be the generic Democrat running at the time Stevens finally got busted for his sh**t.

He didn't win.  Stevens lost.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Four49 on November 19, 2008, 11:54:55 PM
I don't think Obama's going to pick Biden again.  He won't need him.  And he'll (along with the rest of his party) want to pick someone seen as a lock to win the office when he leaves.  So, if Obama's got high exit numbers, #45 will be whoever his next VP is. 

If Obama's a one-termer, it'll be any one of the current GOP Governers.  Except Palin.

After that, my local dog catcher might rise up, for all I know.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Daniel Z on November 21, 2008, 08:17:08 PM
Updated post election

2012:
(
)
Obama/Biden defeat Romney/Jindal

2016
(
)
Huntsman/Putnam defeat Biden/Herseth

2020
(
)
Warner/Giffords defeat Huntsman/Putnam

2024
(
)
Warner/Giffords defeat Putnam/Gov AL

2028
(
)
Giffords/NC Sen defeat Shock/KS Gov

To Sum up
Obama 2009-2017
Huntsman 2017-2021
Warner 2021-2029
Giffords 2029-?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on November 22, 2008, 07:45:58 AM
Bobby Jindal (2013-2017)
Joe Biden (2017-2021)
Bobby Jindal (2021-2025)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Keystone Phil on November 22, 2008, 02:04:45 PM
Bobby Jindal (2013-2017)
Joe Biden (2017-2021)
Bobby Jindal (2021-2025)

Uh...I guess this is playing into the Indian joke. Anyway, Biden isn't going to be nominated at the age of 74 to run for President, Naso.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: BM on November 22, 2008, 06:43:33 PM
Another person to watch is San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom. he's a gay rights activist, illegal immigrant cheerleader, and tax hiker and is hated by conservatives.

He's got skeletons in the closet

+affair with campaign manager's wife

He's extremely ambitious, running for Governor in '10

He's young, late thirties, early forties

And these things make him someone who could win at the national level?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on November 23, 2008, 06:15:32 PM
2009-2017: Barack Obama (D-IL)
2017-2021: Mark R. Warner (D-VA)
2021-2025: Mike Pence (R-IN)

How come only one term for Warner?

A random guess.  I think he could serve 2 terms, but I dunno.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Ronnie on November 24, 2008, 09:03:19 PM
Aw, what the hell:

1) Barack Obama (D-IL) 2009-2013
2) Mark Sanford (R-SC) 2013-2017
3) Jay Nixon (D-MO) 2017-?

And so on


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Governor PiT on November 28, 2008, 06:43:20 PM
Barak Obama: 2009-2013
Gary Johnson: 2013-2021
BJ Lawson: 2021-2029


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: SPC on November 29, 2008, 03:38:33 PM
Barack Obama 2009-2013
Gary Johnson 2013-2021
Steve Westly 2021-2025


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 30, 2008, 04:49:34 PM
Barack Obama 2009-2013
Gary Johnson 2013-2021
Steve Westly 2021-2025

Westly?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: RIP Robert H Bork on December 01, 2008, 07:29:27 PM
Barack Obama (2009-13)
Mike Huckabee (2013-21)
Whoever is Huckabee's VP (2021-25 or 29??)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: The Populist on December 01, 2008, 09:19:42 PM
Barack Obama (2009-2017)
Mike Pence (2017-2021)
Jason Altmire (2021-2029)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Person Man on December 01, 2008, 09:34:39 PM
Gary Johnson sounds like a pretty....interesting guy. Do you think he would have a chance? He seems like Ron Paul 2.0.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Keystone Phil on December 01, 2008, 09:38:35 PM

Very interesting. He has appeal but he's not the Big League type.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Person Man on December 01, 2008, 09:45:27 PM

Very interesting. He has appeal but he's not the Big League type.

Yes, pretty much what I was going to say-

This is what I think will happen-

Barack Obama (2009-2017)
Stephane Herseth-Sandlin (2017-2021)
Charlie Crist (2021-2029)



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: paul718 on December 02, 2008, 12:20:27 AM

Yes, pretty much what I was going to say-

This is what I think will happen-

Barack Obama (2009-2017)
Stephane Herseth-Sandlin (2017-2021)
Charlie Crist (2021-2029)


I refuse to vote for anyone with a hyphenated last name.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: SPC on December 02, 2008, 12:42:07 AM
Gary Johnson sounds like a pretty....interesting guy. Do you think he would have a chance? He seems like Ron Paul 2.0.

My scenario involves Johnson positioning himself as a centrist. Exit polls in NH show that if every anti-war Republican how voted for the only anti-war Republican running, Ron Paul would have won the primary 35-23 over Mitt Romney. Had Paul had enough money to get his name out in New Hampshire early, that demographic probably would have voted for him instead of voting for the hawk McCain. However, Johnson has 3 years to prepare, whereas Paul only had 1. With a conservative split between Romney, Huckabee, and Palin, Johnson would have a good chance at winning New Hampshire.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Person Man on December 02, 2008, 11:34:18 AM

Yes, pretty much what I was going to say-

This is what I think will happen-

Barack Obama (2009-2017)
Stephane Herseth-Sandlin (2017-2021)
Charlie Crist (2021-2029)


I refuse to vote for anyone with a hyphenated last name.

You aren't going to vote for her, anyway.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Person Man on December 02, 2008, 11:22:52 PM
What about a post-Rounds era? Sandlin could do very well in the Gubatorials in 2010 and perhaps get tapped by Obama in 2012 (Palin, but with real experience) or run in 2016.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on December 23, 2008, 01:08:03 PM
Barack Obama (2009-2017)
John Ellis Bush (2017-2025)
Unknown Democrat (2025-2033)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Blazers93 on December 24, 2008, 03:36:56 AM
Obama: 2009-2011
Biden: 2011-2017
Warner: 2017-2021


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: paul718 on December 24, 2008, 01:29:58 PM
Obama: 2009-2011
Biden: 2011-2017
Warner: 2017-2021

What happens to Barry?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Iosif on December 24, 2008, 04:28:42 PM
Barack Obama 2009 - 2017
Boris Johnson 2017 - 2021
Al Franken 2021 - 2021


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Psychic Octopus on December 24, 2008, 04:43:17 PM
Boris Johnson? Britain's mayor? Possible Conservative Prime Minister? What are we, absorbed by the UK for 4 Years?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Iosif on December 24, 2008, 04:53:39 PM
Britain doesn't have a mayor, they have a Queen and a Prime Minister.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: justfollowingtheelections on December 24, 2008, 05:10:47 PM
I just found out that Boris Johnson was born in the United States, which automatically makes him a US citizen.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Iosif on December 24, 2008, 05:21:23 PM
Boris Johnson is a buffoon who only became London mayor because everybody thought it'd be a laugh.

He was born in New York. You lot can have him.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Applezz on December 24, 2008, 10:20:06 PM
Romney (2012-2014)-dies of a heart attack after 2 years making VP Pawlenty the new president
Pawlenty (2014-2020)-wins re-election in 2016 over Hilary Clinton/Bill Richardson
Bayh (2020-2028)-with running mate Bill Richardson beats re-election from Pawlenty/Palin


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Middle-aged Europe on December 28, 2008, 10:31:01 AM
Joe Biden (2010-2011)
Hillary Clinton (2011-2013)
Newt Gingrich (2013-2021)

Eight monthts after Barack Obama is assassinated (and neither by white supremacists nor by al-Qaeda, I might add), President Biden dies of a heart attack. His VP Hillary Clinton serves out the remainder of Obama/Biden's term. In the 2012 election, Newt Gingrich ushers in a new Republican REVOLUTION.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: GMantis on December 28, 2008, 02:17:58 PM
Barack Obama 2009 - 2017
Boris Johnson 2017 - 2021
Al Franken 2021 - 2021
I think if Boris Johnson ran for US president (an utterly absurd scenario, of course), he would of course run as a democrat.
Of course, he wouldn't meet the 14 years residency requirement in 2017.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: SPC on January 05, 2009, 07:45:04 PM
Joe Biden 2009-2013
Gary Johnson 2013-2021
Beau Biden 2021-2029


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Matt Damon™ on January 05, 2009, 08:25:55 PM
Obama 09-13
Palin 13-21
Jindal 21-29


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Psychic Octopus on January 05, 2009, 11:31:10 PM

Never let that happen. Ever.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: CCA on January 10, 2009, 03:50:53 AM
You know for someone who self-identifies as a Democrat, DCDonut seems disturbingly hackish towards Republican Party candidates...


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Matt Damon™ on January 10, 2009, 09:56:27 AM
Obama doesn't look that competent. I favor democrat policies but fear a conservative backlash.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Bacon King on January 10, 2009, 05:00:50 PM
2016-2024: Rebecca Otto (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebecca_Otto)
2024-2032: Mike Fleck (http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/home/member_information/house_bio.cfm?id=1097)
2032-2036: Michael Naso, Jr. (http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y66/Floydbuster/mike1.jpg)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on January 10, 2009, 05:38:09 PM
2016-2024: Rebecca Otto (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebecca_Otto)
2024-2032: Mike Fleck (http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/home/member_information/house_bio.cfm?id=1097)
2032-2036: Michael Naso, Jr. (http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y66/Floydbuster/mike1.jpg)

I clicked each picture and was surprised at the last one. LOL IDK but thanks ;)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Keystone Phil on January 10, 2009, 06:12:40 PM
2016-2024: Rebecca Otto (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebecca_Otto)
2024-2032: Mike Fleck (http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/home/member_information/house_bio.cfm?id=1097)
2032-2036: Michael Naso, Jr. (http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y66/Floydbuster/mike1.jpg)

Oh wow!

Very funny that Fleck was mentioned. We'll see...  ;)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: LongIslandLiberal on January 16, 2009, 08:02:42 PM
Barack Obama (2009-2017)
Claire McCaskill (2017-2021)
Robert Jindal (2021-2025)
Lisa Madigan (2025-2033)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: RIP Robert H Bork on January 17, 2009, 12:26:31 AM
\
Barack Obama (2009-2017)
Claire McCaskill (2017-2021)
Robert Jindal (2021-2025)
Lisa Madigan (2025-2033)

You mean Piyush Jindal?

"Bobby" is usually a nickname for Robert, but in this case his real name is Piyush, not Robert. So yes, I think that he means governor of LA Bobby Jindal.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Matt Damon™ on January 17, 2009, 05:19:01 PM
2013-2021 Palin
2021-2029 Jindal
2029-2037 Stark


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on January 17, 2009, 06:17:13 PM
Tim Pawlenty (2017-2025)
Patrick Kennedy (2025-2029)
Philip Innamorato (2029-2037)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Keystone Phil on January 17, 2009, 06:19:58 PM
Tim Pawlenty (2017-2025)
Patrick Kennedy (2025-2029)
Philip Innamorato (2029-2037)

Knock it off, Naso.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on February 03, 2009, 04:27:20 AM
(2009-2013) Barry Obama
(2013-2017) Mike Huckabee
(2017-2021) Brian Schweitzer

This one actually seems a bit realistic to me...


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: paul718 on February 03, 2009, 11:43:26 AM
(2009-2013) Barry Obama
(2013-2017) Mike Huckabee
(2017-2021) Brian Schweitzer

This one actually seems a bit realistic to me...

Huckabee won't win.  He's a Baptist minister.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: RIP Robert H Bork on February 03, 2009, 08:44:45 PM
(2009-2013) Barry Obama
(2013-2017) Mike Huckabee
(2017-2021) Brian Schweitzer

This one actually seems a bit realistic to me...

Huckabee won't win.  He's a Baptist minister.

So what?? Stop trying to silence Christians. You are simply trying to bash Huckabee.

In Reaganfan's defense, I agree that his list is good.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on February 04, 2009, 12:00:18 AM
Obama = Reagan+FDR

Barack Obama 2009-2017
Gavin Newsom 2017-2021
Reagan's Second Coming 2021-2029
Democrat 2029-2033
Mike Naso 2033-2041
Ben Constine 2041-

Haha that would be awesome. Me standing there as Ben takes the oath to succeed me. HAHA!


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on February 06, 2009, 11:53:49 AM
How about this?

(2009-2013) Sen. Barack Obama
(2013-2017) Gov. Mitt Romney
(2017-2021) Pres. Barack Obama
(2021-2025) Pres. Mitt Romney


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Matt Damon™ on February 06, 2009, 12:04:22 PM
Huckabee
Palin
Jindal


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Psychic Octopus on February 06, 2009, 07:56:50 PM
44. Barack Obama 2009-2013
45. Robert McDonnell 2013-2021
46. John Thune 2021-2025
47. Kirsten Gillibrand 2025-2033


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on February 06, 2009, 09:52:47 PM
Obama = Reagan+FDR

Barack Obama 2009-2017
Gavin Newsom 2017-2021
Reagan's Second Coming 2021-2029
Democrat 2029-2033
Mike Naso 2033-2041
Ben Constine 2041-

Haha that would be awesome. Me standing there as Ben takes the oath to succeed me. HAHA!

That would be awesome ;D  I can only imagine how the forum vote would be split :)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Wall St. Wiz on February 08, 2009, 06:36:01 PM
B. Hussein Obama 2009-2017
H. Rodham Clinton 2017-2021
Piyush Jindal 2021-2029



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Phony Moderate on February 12, 2009, 12:38:14 PM
Barack Obama 2009-2017
Hillary Clinton 2017-2021
Jeb Bush 2021-2025


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on February 12, 2009, 03:12:20 PM
Barack Obama (2009-2013)
Tim Pawlenty (2013-2021)
Val Kilmer (2021-2025)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Franzl on February 12, 2009, 06:07:47 PM
(2009-2013) Barry Obama
(2013-2017) Mike Huckabee
(2017-2021) Brian Schweitzer

This one actually seems a bit realistic to me...

Huckabee won't win.  He's a Baptist minister.

So what?? Stop trying to silence Christians. You are simply trying to bash Huckabee.

In Reaganfan's defense, I agree that his list is good.

Ummm...so what? You see, that's basically the way it is in politics....both parties try to bash each other...get it?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on February 12, 2009, 06:14:32 PM
Barack Obama (2009-2017)
John Thune (2017-2021)
Mark Warner (2021-2029)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Fritz on February 14, 2009, 12:10:04 PM
Barack Obama (2009-2011)
Joe Biden (2011-2017)
Hillary Clinton (2017-2025)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on February 14, 2009, 04:55:13 PM
(D) Barack Obama (2009-2013)
(R) Sarah Palin (2013-2021)
(R) John Thune (2021-2029)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Daniel Z on February 14, 2009, 07:54:43 PM
Good Obama Presidency
Barack Obama 2009-2017
Joe Biden 2017-2021
Jon Huntsman 2021-2029
Kirsten Gillibrand 2029-2037

Mediocre Obama Presidency
Barack Obama 2009-2017
John Thune 2017-2025
Gabrielle Giffords 2025-2029
Aaron Schock 2029-2037

Bad Obama Presidency
Barack Obama 2009-2013
Mitt Romney 2013-2021
Bobby Jindal 2021-2025
Luke Ravenstahl 2025-2032


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Daniel Plainview on February 14, 2009, 10:47:44 PM
Yawn. So we're still going from 2012, even thiygh this thread precludes it?

Barack Obama: 2009-2013
Bobby Jindal:2013-2017
Brad Henry:2016-2024


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Psychic Octopus on February 14, 2009, 10:54:36 PM
I haven't seen mention of Brad Henry as a presidential candidate in years, even on this site. It's good to see that again.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Keystone Phil on February 14, 2009, 11:03:45 PM

Ha. Interesting. I notice how he doesn't serve the full two terms. What's up there?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Holmes on February 14, 2009, 11:39:36 PM
Al Gore -> John Kerry -> Barack Obama -> Brad Henry?

Please explain the primary voter's major shift in ideology.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on February 18, 2009, 04:35:24 PM
That seems impossible to imagine, for a simple reason : if Obama stays in office for 2 terms, and so do his successors, that will mean 2037. The potential candidates in 2037 are today 20 or 30 years old ! Nobody could know them today...


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: tmthforu94 on February 19, 2009, 07:39:42 PM
Barack Obama 2009-2011
Joseph Biden 2011-2013
Mitt Romney 2013-2017
John Thune 2017-2025


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on February 20, 2009, 04:32:49 AM
Ok, I will imagine...

Barack Obama : 2009-2017
John Edwards : 2017-2025
*a moderate republican* : 2025-...


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DanielX on February 20, 2009, 10:08:12 AM
Ok, I will imagine...

Barack Obama : 2009-2017
John Edwards : 2017-2025
*a moderate republican* : 2025-...

I'm highly doubtful of Edwards; he ran for and lost the nomination twice and is not terribly popular in his home state of North Carolina. I think that Sebelius, Henry, or Napolitano would be more realistic; heck, Newsom would be more realistic as well. Also, its not likely that either party will have two 2-term presidents in a row.

Here's my prediction - very loose, as predictions this far in advance should be:
(Obama - current)
Huntsman,  Jindal, or Sanford (in 2012 or 2016)
Sebelius, Napolitano, or Henry (in 2020)
Jindal, Flake, Drolet, or Haridopolis (in 2024 or 2028)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on February 20, 2009, 12:30:42 PM
Why not Edwards ? Lot of things can happen in 8 years... If it's not Edwards, it will be Clinton or Biden, but I'm sure that we'll have at least 12 years of democratic government.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Keystone Phil on February 20, 2009, 12:33:41 PM
Why not Edwards ? Lot of things can happen in 8 years... If it's not Edwards, it will be Clinton or Biden, but I'm sure that we'll have at least 12 years of democratic government.

Edwards dug himself one of the deepest political graves by cheating on his wife (who happens to be suffering from cancer) and there are rumors that he fathered his mistress' child.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Person Man on February 20, 2009, 12:49:40 PM
Why not Edwards ? Lot of things can happen in 8 years... If it's not Edwards, it will be Clinton or Biden, but I'm sure that we'll have at least 12 years of democratic government.

Edwards dug himself one of the deepest political graves by cheating on his wife (who happens to be suffering from cancer) and there are rumors that he fathered his mistress' child.

I thought he was caught in TWO affairs...


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on February 20, 2009, 01:31:14 PM
Why not Edwards ? Lot of things can happen in 8 years... If it's not Edwards, it will be Clinton or Biden, but I'm sure that we'll have at least 12 years of democratic government.
Edwards dug himself one of the deepest political graves by cheating on his wife (who happens to be suffering from cancer) and there are rumors that he fathered his mistress' child.

Yes, I see... Rumors are very ( too ) importants in politics. But with a good communication, everyone can make people forget them ( Nixon and Clinton are best examples ). I don't want to assume that he will become president, I just wanted to immagine this.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on February 20, 2009, 02:52:43 PM
Why not Edwards ? Lot of things can happen in 8 years... If it's not Edwards, it will be Clinton or Biden, but I'm sure that we'll have at least 12 years of democratic government.

Edwards dug himself one of the deepest political graves by cheating on his wife (who happens to be suffering from cancer) and there are rumors that he fathered his mistress' child.

Yeah are you sure Rick didn't have a mistress?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: GLPman on February 26, 2009, 09:23:43 AM
2009-2017 Barack Obama
2017-2021 Tim Pawlenty
2021-2025 Jeff Flake


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Josh/Devilman88 on February 26, 2009, 11:39:18 AM
2009-2013: Barack Obama(D-IL)/Joe Biden(D-DE)
2013-2021: Jon Huntsman, Jr(R-UT)/Charlie Crist(R-FL)
2021-2025:Charlie Crist(R-FL)/Susan M. Collins(R-ME)
2025-: Mary Landrieu(D-LA)/Deval Patrick(D-MA)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on February 26, 2009, 04:25:33 PM
Mitt Romney (2013-2017)
Barack Obama (2017-2021)
George Bush (2021-2029)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Psychic Octopus on March 01, 2009, 02:09:26 PM
Barack Obama 2009-2017
Russ Feingold 2017-2021
Bobby Jindal 2021-2029


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Nixon in '80 on March 01, 2009, 05:19:31 PM
2009-2017 Barack Obama
2017-2021 Tim Pawlenty
2021-2025 Jeff Flake

Why only one term for Pawlenty... does Flake primary him, or does he retire?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on March 01, 2009, 07:29:19 PM

2017-2025: John Thune
2025-2029: Mark Warner
2029-2037: George P. Bush


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: GLPman on March 02, 2009, 03:31:45 PM
2009-2017 Barack Obama
2017-2021 Tim Pawlenty
2021-2025 Jeff Flake

Why only one term for Pawlenty... does Flake primary him, or does he retire?

Flake is Pawlenty's running mate in 2016. Pawlenty declines to run in 2020 for whatever reason. I wanted to make things interesting.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Applezz on March 08, 2009, 10:13:06 PM
Bad Obama presidency:
2012-2016 Mark Sanford/Tim Pawlenty
2016-2024 Hilary Clinton/Mark Warner
2024-2028 Bobby Jindal/Eric Cantor

Good Obama Presidency:
2016-2024 Clinton/Warner
2024-2032 Jindal/Palin
2032- unknown


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: SPC on March 08, 2009, 11:58:42 PM
Ron Paul or Mark Sanford or Gary Johnson 2013-2021

Don't know about the rest.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: ○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└ on March 09, 2009, 12:48:44 AM

Are you serious?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Keystone Phil on March 09, 2009, 10:58:13 AM

He's a Paul supporter. They're all serious when they say that.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on March 10, 2009, 01:21:09 AM
Barack Obama (2009-2013)
Newt Gingrich (2013-2017)
Barack Obama (2017-2021)
John Thune (2021-2029)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: pbrower2a on March 29, 2009, 12:14:44 AM
45. Olympia Snowe (2017-2021) ... as a Democrat!

46, 47... you tell me how the Democratic Party splits.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: RosettaStoned on March 30, 2009, 08:15:38 PM
45. some southern republican (2017-2021)
46. some western democrat (2021-2029)
47. the preceding president's VP (2029-2033)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Lincoln Republican on March 30, 2009, 09:44:36 PM
After Barack Obama 2009-2013

Mitt Romney 2013-2021
Jeb Bush 2021-2025
Mark Pryor 2025-2033


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Person Man on March 31, 2009, 11:02:04 AM
Barack Obama (2009-2013)
Newt Gingrich (2013-2017)
Barack Obama (2017-2021)
John Thune (2021-2029)

Obama is 44...and 46. :P


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on March 31, 2009, 04:23:07 PM

:)

Also, LOL at Romney and Jeb Bush.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on April 13, 2009, 07:50:53 PM
Barack Obama (2009-2013)
Newt Gingrich (2013-2017)
Barack Obama (2017-2021)
John Thune (2021-2029)

Obama is 44...and 46. :P

Yep.

How about this?

Barack Obama (2009-2013)
Mike Huckabee (2013-2017)
Brian Schweitzer (2017-2025)
Aaron Schock (2025-2033)



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: tonyreyes89 on May 10, 2009, 05:10:16 PM
Barack Obama/Joe Biden 2009-2017
Hillary Clinton/Evan Byah 2017-2021
Bobby Jindal/Sarah Palin 2021-2029
Tony Reyes/Alex Kostal 2029-2037


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: JerryBrown2010 on May 22, 2009, 10:50:25 PM
Obama/Biden 2009 - 2017
Clinton/Sebelius 2017 - 2025
Jindal/Bush 2025 -

George P. Bush Jeb Bush's Son is selected for vice presidency


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: BM on May 23, 2009, 03:57:41 PM
I just noticed how many Palin predictions there were in the early posts of this thread (summer 2008).  Now hardly anyone seems to want to show an inkling of support for her.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on May 24, 2009, 10:09:01 AM
Obama : 2009-2017
Biden or Clinton or someone else : 2017-2025
A moderate western republican : 2025-2033
A radical progressive democrat : 2033-2037


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: You kip if you want to... on May 24, 2009, 04:09:29 PM
Obama 2009-2017
A current Democratic governor or senator (probably Mark Warner) 2017-2023
A mid-western, moderate Republican 2023-2031
A southern Democrat 2031-2039


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on July 03, 2009, 03:47:31 AM
(2017-2021) John Thune
(2021-2025) Brian Schweitzer
(2025-2031) Kelsey Grammer


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Dan the Roman on July 03, 2009, 06:17:33 AM
Barrack Obama 2009-2017
Jon Huntsman   2017-2025
Unknown GOP VP 2025-2029


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: tmthforu94 on July 03, 2009, 09:21:56 AM
Mitt Romney - 2013-2021
Mark Warner - 2021-2025
Bobby Jindal - 2025-2029


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: 5280 on July 03, 2009, 02:39:45 PM
^ same as that


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mint on July 03, 2009, 02:50:26 PM
Barack Obama (2009-2010)
Joe Biden (2010-2013)
Unknown Republican (2013-)

My suspicion is that the economy will collapse entirely sometime between now and 2010. We'll be racked by high crime and civil unrest culminating in Obama being assassinated. Hope I'm wrong.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Vepres on July 03, 2009, 03:19:21 PM
Barack Obama (2009-2010)
Joe Biden (2010-2013)
Unknown Republican (2013-)

My suspicion is that the economy will collapse entirely sometime between now and 2010. We'll be racked by high crime and civil unrest culminating in Obama being assassinated. Hope I'm wrong.

Now now, don't be too optimistic here. ::)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Vepres on July 03, 2009, 03:42:19 PM
As for my predictions:

Mitt Romney (2013-2021)
Moderate Western Democrat (2021-2029)
Moderate libertarian Republican (2029-2033/2027)



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mint on July 03, 2009, 04:15:04 PM
Barack Obama (2009-2010)
Joe Biden (2010-2013)
Unknown Republican (2013-)

My suspicion is that the economy will collapse entirely sometime between now and 2010. We'll be racked by high crime and civil unrest culminating in Obama being assassinated. Hope I'm wrong.

Now now, don't be too optimistic here. ::)

Give me a reason to and I will be.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Dan the Roman on July 03, 2009, 05:15:24 PM
Barack Obama (2009-2010)
Joe Biden (2010-2013)
Unknown Republican (2013-)

My suspicion is that the economy will collapse entirely sometime between now and 2010. We'll be racked by high crime and civil unrest culminating in Obama being assassinated. Hope I'm wrong.

The odds that a Republican would win in that scenario in 2012 are not high, though if there were an ugly Hillary-Biden Primary, possible. Given the current verbal climate, too many people would associate an assassination with elements in the Conservative movement.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mint on July 03, 2009, 05:24:52 PM
Barack Obama (2009-2010)
Joe Biden (2010-2013)
Unknown Republican (2013-)

My suspicion is that the economy will collapse entirely sometime between now and 2010. We'll be racked by high crime and civil unrest culminating in Obama being assassinated. Hope I'm wrong.

The odds that a Republican would win in that scenario in 2012 are not high, though if there were an ugly Hillary-Biden Primary, possible. Given the current verbal climate, too many people would associate an assassination with elements in the Conservative movement.

I think that would be a factor, but when you have close to 1/4th or 1/3rd of the population out of work after about four years of promises people will be tired of the Democrats (and possibly the Republicans too). Anyway I'd give Obama about 50/50 chance of making it out of his term but I'm completely convinced now that we're heading towards something which dwarfs the Great Depression. I honestly wish I could share the optimism of 90% of this board but when China and co are moving away from the currency at the same time we're spending record amounts I really don't see this ending well.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Dan the Roman on July 03, 2009, 06:20:44 PM
Barack Obama (2009-2010)
Joe Biden (2010-2013)
Unknown Republican (2013-)

My suspicion is that the economy will collapse entirely sometime between now and 2010. We'll be racked by high crime and civil unrest culminating in Obama being assassinated. Hope I'm wrong.

The odds that a Republican would win in that scenario in 2012 are not high, though if there were an ugly Hillary-Biden Primary, possible. Given the current verbal climate, too many people would associate an assassination with elements in the Conservative movement.

I think that would be a factor, but when you have close to 1/4th or 1/3rd of the population out of work after about four years of promises people will be tired of the Democrats (and possibly the Republicans too). Anyway I'd give Obama about 50/50 chance of making it out of his term but I'm completely convinced now that we're heading towards something which dwarfs the Great Depression. I honestly wish I could share the optimism of 90% of this board but when China and co are moving away from the currency at the same time we're spending record amounts I really don't see this ending well.

I doubt we will get that bad. If the US imploded to that degree it causes such critical problems for China and India that they need us. Plus the US is insulated far better than Europe. You see there are two places for money in the world: US treasuries and stocks. When stocks go down, the dollar goes up. For all this talk about inflation, the dollar has been the strongest its been in a decade during the height of the financial crisis. It is still trading 20% above where it was a year ago.

The people who are in real trouble is Europe, especially the UK which is engaging in our spending without any of the safeguards we have.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: pogo stick on July 08, 2009, 11:48:15 AM
Barack Obama - 2009-2017
Sarah Palin 2017-2025
John Thune 2025-current


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese on July 08, 2009, 04:00:17 PM
Barack Obama 2009-2017
Jon Huntsman 2017-2021
Hilda Solis/Kirsten Gilibrand 2021-2028



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DS0816 on July 09, 2009, 05:12:05 PM
There's no point to this! But what the hell…

No. 44: Barack Obama (D-Illinois)
No. 45: Claire McCaskill (D-Missouri)
No. 46: Aaron Schock (R-Illinois)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on July 11, 2009, 11:29:50 AM
(2017-2025) Bob McDonnell
(2025-2029) Harold Ford
(2029-2037) Meghan McCain


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: liberalkid on July 13, 2009, 11:55:59 AM
Romney beats Obama over the economy, picks Charlie Christ
Crist loses to Mark Warner
Warner's VP, Clinton, wins over  Jindal


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on July 14, 2009, 06:32:57 AM
Haley Barbour (2013-2017)
Hillary Clinton (2017-2021)
Jeb Bush (2021-2029)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on July 21, 2009, 05:25:19 PM
Mitt Romney (2013-2021)
John Thune (2021-2029)
Unknown Western Democrat (2029-2037)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: pogo stick on July 21, 2009, 05:29:25 PM
Palin (2013-2021)
Herseth-Sandlin (2021-2029)
Thune (2029-??)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: tmthforu94 on July 21, 2009, 06:01:30 PM
Gov. Romney/Gov. Hutchison- 2013-2021
Sen. Warner/Gov. Herseth-Sandlin- 2021-2025
Gov. Becky Skillman/Sen. Tagg Romney- 2025-???


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on July 22, 2009, 03:25:07 PM
Barack Obama, Thune, and Cuomo.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on July 23, 2009, 01:18:20 PM
Naso, why do you keep doing this?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Hillary 2016 on July 27, 2009, 03:29:07 PM
hi everyone !  im new here...

This is a tough one, but...

Barack Obama (2009-2017)
Sarah Palin (2017-2021)
Patrick Murphy (2021-2029)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: President Mitt on July 27, 2009, 03:44:16 PM
Barack Obama (2009- 2017)
John Thune (2017- 2025)
Who the Hell Knows? (2025- ????)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mr.Phips on July 27, 2009, 07:48:25 PM
Mitt Romney(2013-2021)
Charlie Crist(2021-2025)
Some Unknown Democrat(2025-2033)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on July 29, 2009, 03:17:21 PM
Sen. John McCain (2009-2013)
Sen. Mark Warner (2013-2021) (narrowly def. Gov. Bobby Jindal)
Fmr. Gov. Bobby Jindal (2021-?)

Certainly not certain or anything close, but I think McCain wins and Warner faces Jindal in 2012


Pigs will fly before McCain run agains


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on July 29, 2009, 03:21:33 PM
This tread make absolutelly no sense other than just for fun

First of all, It's too earlty to predict anything

Second of all, save well-know names. They getting older and older and by 2016 (assuming Obama winning reelection) we'll rather see new names and faces, someone you'd not consider right now

Seriously, who would say in 2005 that Obama will be Bush successor. All right, many people thought aldready he may be President someday: someday, certainly not so quick.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: hcallega on July 29, 2009, 08:56:01 PM
I think we can pretty safely predict a group of candidates who could plausibly win the 2012 GOP nomination:

Sarah Palin
Mike Huckabee
Mit Romney
Newt Gingrich
John Thune
Bobby Jindal
Charlie Crist
Haley Barbour

Now odds are that they will loose, if only because the GOP is in such dire straits and I think Obama's worst case scenario is something like Bush in 2004. So then the key is who gives the keynote address or who REALLY makes a scene, like if Rubio was to beat Crist for the GOP nomination in FLA. My bet would be Thune for the GOP in 2016, and lets say he faces Biden, well then he probably wins. If he faces Hillary, then its a tossup, and if he faces a popular moderate (Warner, Schweitzer, Kaine) then he prolly looses. Anyway, just for fun here is my guess

Barack Obama-D 2009-2017
John Thune-R 2017-2021
Western or Hispanic Democrat-D 2021?

I personally see Hispanics becoming the next Irish Catholics in the Dem Party, as in running the party machinery within the next 20 years.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mr. Morden on July 30, 2009, 04:15:54 AM
I think we can pretty safely predict a group of candidates who could plausibly win the 2012 GOP nomination:

Sarah Palin
Mike Huckabee
Mit Romney
Newt Gingrich
John Thune
Bobby Jindal
Charlie Crist
Haley Barbour

Pawlenty should be on that list.  Way more likely than, say, Charlie Crist, who is almost certainly not running in 2012.


Title: Re: I guess this has become name the next two after Obama
Post by: Mr. Morden on July 30, 2009, 04:27:27 AM
For reference, let's go back to Ike and from six months into the administration of each president, see where the next two future presidents were.

With respect, such an exercise doesn't really work unless you were following politics closely all those decades ago.  You write for example that it would be crazy to pick Reagan as a future president in the mid-70s because of his age.  But Dole was widely viewed as a potential 1996 candidate as early as 1992, despite the fact that no one over 70 had ever won the nomination of either major party.  So it's possible that Reagan was widely viewed as a likely challenger in 1980 years in advance.  I don't know, because I'm not old enough to have been following politics back then.

Likewise, Bush was a darkhorse possibility for Ford's VP in 1976.  It's possible that he was being discussed as a possible future presidential candidate as far back as the first year of Carter's term.  Though I don't know if he was or not, because I wasn't around then.  And people were apparently talking about Clinton as a future presidential candidate in the 1980s (though again, I'm too young to have been following politics back then, so I'm just repeating what I've read).

You're right that we are very unlikely to guess the exact circumstances under which someone becomes president in the future, but there's a very good chance that one or more of the names mentioned in this thread will someday be president.  Most recent presidents were known at least to political junkies at least 8 years in advance of them being elected.  Not GW Bush or Obama, true, they both came on the scene less than 8 years before being president.  But it's too early to say whether that's an aberration or the new normal.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Person Man on July 30, 2009, 09:58:00 AM
For reference, let's go back to Ike and from six months into the administration of each president, see where the next two future presidents were.

With respect, such an exercise doesn't really work unless you were following politics closely all those decades ago.  You write for example that it would be crazy to pick Reagan as a future president in the mid-70s because of his age.  But Dole was widely viewed as a potential 1996 candidate as early as 1992, despite the fact that no one over 70 had ever won the nomination of either major party.  So it's possible that Reagan was widely viewed as a likely challenger in 1980 years in advance.  I don't know, because I'm not old enough to have been following politics back then.

Likewise, Bush was a darkhorse possibility for Ford's VP in 1976.  It's possible that he was being discussed as a possible future presidential candidate as far back as the first year of Carter's term.  Though I don't know if he was or not, because I wasn't around then.  And people were apparently talking about Clinton as a future presidential candidate in the 1980s (though again, I'm too young to have been following politics back then, so I'm just repeating what I've read).

You're right that we are very unlikely to guess the exact circumstances under which someone becomes president in the future, but there's a very good chance that one or more of the names mentioned in this thread will someday be president.  Most recent presidents were known at least to political junkies at least 8 years in advance of them being elected.  Not GW Bush or Obama, true, they both came on the scene less than 8 years before being president.  But it's too early to say whether that's an aberration or the new normal.


Yes, it's guesswork.  I'm just trying to get into the mindset with the info I have. 

The internet has made the observance of political junkies an easier task.  In 85, 7 years before he got elected, Clinton was largely unknown until his flop of a nomination speech in 1988.  But if a place like this existed, we'd know about him as a governor in his late 30s, a strong politician from the same region as the last Democratic president.  On the other hand, six months into Reagan's first term, he was a guy who had served two years as governor of Arkansas then been voted out of office.  It seems a much less likely to predict he'd make a comeback and be the 2nd president after Reagan.  I'm just trying to guess but I assume someone like Ted Kennedy, Bill Bradley, Al Gore, Gary Hart or Joe Biden would have been a more common prediction.

Dole and Reagan are a little different in that by the time Dole was nominated Reagan was already a precedent of a president who- except the first 3 weeks of his term- was in his 70s.  And of course the game here is guess subsequent presidents so if you guessed Dole would become president in spite of his age, you'd be wrong.  Six months into Nixon's first term, Reagan was 57 and a plausible pick as the next president immediately after Nixon.  But if in 1969 -I'm speculating- you picked Reagan to be elected in 1980, I'm just assuming that would be a less likely pick to make when we'd never had a president in his 70s.  (Note how few people pick Biden or even Hillary here even with the precedent.)  Dole was the age Reagan was nominated for a 2nd term and 4 years before the election is a bit easier to pick. 

Also given the rarity of a single White House term for a party, it would have been more common to pick two terms for Nixon and if a Democrat succeeds him, two for that guy.  Actually, while no one knew Watergate would happen, given how common assassinations were in the 60s, six months into Nixon's term, it wouldn't have been unreasonable to think Nixon wouldn't finish his term (though a bit vulgar to predict it in a game perhaps.)

I think it's very likely the next president is now known to us- maybe only as a candidate in next year's elections, or maybe someone more obvious like Hillary Clinton or Mitt Romney.  As for who is elected in 2020 or 2024, it could be someone like Jindal or Gillibrand or Gabrielle Giffords or Paul Ryan.  But I think there are also very good chances it's someone who won't be elected to anything for another 5-10 years.


That's pretty much how 2008 was. Obama really was just a freshman state legislator when W. was first sworn in. Then again, John McCain was almost nominated instead of W. and appear on the ballot for his party in 2008. So. You can ask yourself this question- at the start of his forerunner's presidency, how many times was the next president actually known to the American People? In 1994, Bush took the nation by storm in the Contract On America by becoming Governor of Texas. In 1980, Herbert Walker was already the VEEP. In 1976, Reagan had been floating around forever. In 1968, very few people knew who Carter was and I am not sure that he was even a Governor yet. In 1960, Nixon was already Vice President. In 1953, JFK was in his 30s and had just gotten out of the Navy. In 1945, people already saw Eisenhower as one of the greatest statemen that America had or would ever have...both parties sought for him to join as he made the likes of Snowe or Schuler look radical....before 1945, I wonder whether people thought that FDR would ever leave..


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on July 30, 2009, 11:03:39 AM
Haley Barbour (2013-2017)
Hillary Clinton (2017-2021)
Jeb Bush (2021-2029)

You know they'll be old, don't you?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on July 31, 2009, 05:21:56 PM
Obama's rise still astounds me. That'd be like me retiring from the U.S. Air Force at 41, running for the State Senate, two years later the U.S. Senate, then four years later being elected President.

Whose got money on me :D


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: pogo stick on August 01, 2009, 11:11:17 AM
Sarah Palin : 2013-2021
Jim Webb : 2021-2025
Trey Grayson : 2025-????


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on August 01, 2009, 11:16:57 AM
Sarah Palin : 2013-2021
Jim Webb : 2021-2025
Trey Grayson : 2025-????

I don't think Palin could even be nominee in 2012 after her suspicious resignation. Well, she's still "young" and may want until 2016 or 2020.

You realize Webb would be 74 in 2021?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: pbrower2a on August 01, 2009, 12:06:06 PM
to 2017       Barack Hussein (D, IL)
2017-2021  Jon Huntsman    (D, UT)
2021-??     

I don't have the Party identification wrong on Huntsman; he will have left or been purged from the Republican Party.  By 2018 the Republican Party will have gone the way of the Federalists and Whigs (or States' Rights at the absolute worst; in 1968 one of its few card-carrying members was James Earl Ray). By 2020 the Democratic Party is so unwieldy that it splits into a Social Democratic Party and a Christian Democratic Party as American politics become more ... European.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: pogo stick on August 01, 2009, 12:21:37 PM
to 2017       Barack Hussein (D, IL)
2017-2021  Jon Huntsman    (D, UT)
2021-??     

I don't have the Party identification wrong on Huntsman; he will have left or been purged from the Republican Party.  By 2018 the Republican Party will have gone the way of the Federalists and Whigs (or States' Rights at the absolute worst; in 1968 one of its few card-carrying members was James Earl Ray). By 2020 the Democratic Party is so unwieldy that it splits into a Social Democratic Party and a Christian Democratic Party as American politics become more ... European.

in your dreams Democrat.



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: pbrower2a on August 01, 2009, 12:53:57 PM
to 2017       Barack Hussein (D, IL)
2017-2021  Jon Huntsman    (D, UT)
2021-??     

I don't have the Party identification wrong on Huntsman; he will have left or been purged from the Republican Party.  By 2018 the Republican Party will have gone the way of the Federalists and Whigs (or States' Rights at the absolute worst; in 1968 one of its few card-carrying members was James Earl Ray). By 2020 the Democratic Party is so unwieldy that it splits into a Social Democratic Party and a Christian Democratic Party as American politics become more ... European.

in your dreams Democrat.

No, in your nightmares -- if you have any wisdom.

The GOP needs to develop a different coalition if it is to have any continuing relevance as a political entity. Show me the formation of a new coalition (because current young voters are not going GOP) and you just might have a revived Republican Party.



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on August 01, 2009, 03:55:21 PM
to 2017       Barack Hussein (D, IL)
2017-2021  Jon Huntsman    (D, UT)
2021-??     

I don't have the Party identification wrong on Huntsman; he will have left or been purged from the Republican Party.  By 2018 the Republican Party will have gone the way of the Federalists and Whigs (or States' Rights at the absolute worst; in 1968 one of its few card-carrying members was James Earl Ray). By 2020 the Democratic Party is so unwieldy that it splits into a Social Democratic Party and a Christian Democratic Party as American politics become more ... European.

That's a good point. In most of European countries such people as Brownback, Bush, Coburn of Inhofe would be nothing more than a bunch of fringe politicians without any significance and probably out of any parliament. But in U.S. they are, scary to say, in some way mainstream.

Well, even in Poland in worst case guys like Bush, Coburn or DeMint woule be members of some very fringe, minor party as present League of Polish Families :P

The same applies to people like Bernie Sanders, Dennis Kucinich or Barbara Boxer. According to U.S. standarts they are "far-left", but in Europe they'd regular social democrats.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Vepres on August 01, 2009, 06:26:31 PM
to 2017       Barack Hussein (D, IL)
2017-2021  Jon Huntsman    (D, UT)
2021-??     

I don't have the Party identification wrong on Huntsman; he will have left or been purged from the Republican Party.  By 2018 the Republican Party will have gone the way of the Federalists and Whigs (or States' Rights at the absolute worst; in 1968 one of its few card-carrying members was James Earl Ray). By 2020 the Democratic Party is so unwieldy that it splits into a Social Democratic Party and a Christian Democratic Party as American politics become more ... European.

That's a good point. In most of European countries such people as Brownback, Bush, Coburn of Inhofe would be nothing more than a bunch of fringe politicians without any significance and probably out of any parliament. But in U.S. they are, scary to say, in some way mainstream.

Well, even in Poland in worst case guys like Bush, Coburn or DeMint woule be members of some very fringe, minor party as present League of Polish Families :P

The same applies to people like Bernie Sanders, Dennis Kucinich or Barbara Boxer. According to U.S. standarts they are "far-left", but in Europe they'd regular social democrats.

Hmmm... and the US is the most economically successful country at the moment and, if trends continue, will recover from this recession faster than many European countries.

Anyway, the Republicans aren't going anywhere. There's a reason they've survived 150 years.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: War on Want on August 01, 2009, 06:41:04 PM
to 2017       Barack Hussein (D, IL)
2017-2021  Jon Huntsman    (D, UT)
2021-??     

I don't have the Party identification wrong on Huntsman; he will have left or been purged from the Republican Party.  By 2018 the Republican Party will have gone the way of the Federalists and Whigs (or States' Rights at the absolute worst; in 1968 one of its few card-carrying members was James Earl Ray). By 2020 the Democratic Party is so unwieldy that it splits into a Social Democratic Party and a Christian Democratic Party as American politics become more ... European.

That's a good point. In most of European countries such people as Brownback, Bush, Coburn of Inhofe would be nothing more than a bunch of fringe politicians without any significance and probably out of any parliament. But in U.S. they are, scary to say, in some way mainstream.

Well, even in Poland in worst case guys like Bush, Coburn or DeMint woule be members of some very fringe, minor party as present League of Polish Families :P

The same applies to people like Bernie Sanders, Dennis Kucinich or Barbara Boxer. According to U.S. standarts they are "far-left", but in Europe they'd regular social democrats.

Hmmm... and the US is the most economically successful country at the moment and, if trends continue, will recover from this recession faster than many European countries.

Anyway, the Republicans aren't going anywhere. There's a reason they've survived 150 years.
Not really...


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: TeePee4Prez on August 02, 2009, 06:33:48 PM
hi everyone !  im new here...

Patrick Murphy (2021-2029)

Welcome.  Where from?

I met Pat before, but that's wishful thinking.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Hillary 2016 on August 02, 2009, 10:42:00 PM
I'm from Pennsylvania and I can tell you are too.

Yes, let's think about that - in 2001, the next President of the United States LOST a congressional primary, if you go back to 1993, the second next President was a 31-year-old law professor.

I don't think ANYONE knows who the President in 2012, 2016, 2020 will be.  It could be someone that doesn't even land on the political radar right now...

I just have this gut feeling though about Al Franken.  I think he might be the nominee in 2016.  Yes, I know, President Franken?  First Lady Franni Franken?  It sounds so odd...but yet, if you told someone eight years ago in my home state of Pennsylvania that a man by the name of Barack Hussein Obama would be the President in 2008, they'd say "What the **** are you smoking?".


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: TeePee4Prez on August 03, 2009, 01:22:06 AM
I'm from Pennsylvania and I can tell you are too.

Yes, let's think about that - in 2001, the next President of the United States LOST a congressional primary, if you go back to 1993, the second next President was a 31-year-old law professor.

I don't think ANYONE knows who the President in 2012, 2016, 2020 will be.  It could be someone that doesn't even land on the political radar right now...

I just have this gut feeling though about Al Franken.  I think he might be the nominee in 2016.  Yes, I know, President Franken?  First Lady Franni Franken?  It sounds so odd...but yet, if you told someone eight years ago in my home state of Pennsylvania that a man by the name of Barack Hussein Obama would be the President in 2008, they'd say "What the **** are you smoking?".

Wouldn't write him off.  Pat Murphy does have potential, but I don't think it's likely.  I'm thinking he's gonna be asked to keep that Congressional seat for sometime because the GOP bench in Bucks is too deep and the Dems don't really have much of one.  I would like to see Russ Feingold.

Here's my picks:

Barack Obama (D, 2009-2017)
Russ Feingold (D, 2017-2021)
George P. Bush or some moderate Republican because me think the GOP will get their heads out of their asses by then (R, 2021-2029) 


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 03, 2009, 11:45:06 AM
I still think Chris Christie has huge potential though I admit my bias


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Person Man on August 09, 2009, 10:55:12 PM
to 2017       Barack Hussein (D, IL)
2017-2021  Jon Huntsman    (D, UT)
2021-??     

I don't have the Party identification wrong on Huntsman; he will have left or been purged from the Republican Party.  By 2018 the Republican Party will have gone the way of the Federalists and Whigs (or States' Rights at the absolute worst; in 1968 one of its few card-carrying members was James Earl Ray). By 2020 the Democratic Party is so unwieldy that it splits into a Social Democratic Party and a Christian Democratic Party as American politics become more ... European.

That's a good point. In most of European countries such people as Brownback, Bush, Coburn of Inhofe would be nothing more than a bunch of fringe politicians without any significance and probably out of any parliament. But in U.S. they are, scary to say, in some way mainstream.

Well, even in Poland in worst case guys like Bush, Coburn or DeMint woule be members of some very fringe, minor party as present League of Polish Families :P

The same applies to people like Bernie Sanders, Dennis Kucinich or Barbara Boxer. According to U.S. standarts they are "far-left", but in Europe they'd regular social democrats.

Hmmm... and the US is the most economically successful country at the moment and, if trends continue, will recover from this recession faster than many European countries.

Anyway, the Republicans aren't going anywhere. There's a reason they've survived 150 years.

....and the U.S. is one of the fattest countries. I think our greed is a double-edged sword. If you are greedy, but  your life up, you will just be another fat ass. If you are greedy and succeed, you can hire someone to put you on a diet, or "just have the surger(ies)" and be rich AND hot. Very nice.

...back to the topic at hand. The Democrats and Republicans have about a 60% chance to survive as long as the United States Constitution isn't been overturned. That could be 50 years or even a few years. That could be 2000 years or even more. I would say that in the other 40%, it would probably be that one wing of one party that cannot be dislodged even when their leadership has caused ruin. If this happens, one party will probably start to splinter into a bunch of third parties and a new 2nd party will eventually come back, with the help of moderates from the dominant party. The wheels could have been set in motion if the Democrats lost in 2006 or lost in 2008 and let McCain have his way (or if both happened- 2006 to start the process and 2008 to reenforce it). I would give it a 5% that any party would become totally dominant for more than 10 years. You could say that the dems did this between 1930 and 1950 or the pubs did between 1896 and 1912, but the party was only the "best" party in America because there was an anti-administration coalition between moderates and the minority party. There was the "Progressive/Bull-Moose Coalition" or the "Southern/Conservative Coalition", for example. However, in these times, its unlikely that a "Coalition" would actually form outside of getting the public option dropped for a co-op plan. There are just too many angry rednecks and angry hippies. So, if anger is allowed to stew for more than say 3 or 4 elections of one-party dominance, the other party will start to break up. So, a second party forming straight from the moderates of another party doesn't make much sense.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 10, 2009, 01:35:43 AM
I still think Chris Christie has huge potential though I admit my bias

He's got to lose some pounds first, or we'll be seeing the next Taft.

And a name change. I wouldn't vote for Bill Billie, George Georgie, or Barack Barackie. I'm definitely not voting for a Chris Christie.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Person Man on August 10, 2009, 02:37:06 PM
See. This is why I have so much contempt for Ron Paul. He has two first names. And I will be damned if I ever trust a dude, or chick for that matter, that has two first names.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on August 10, 2009, 03:16:01 PM
I still think Chris Christie has huge potential though I admit my bias

He's got to lose some pounds first, or we'll be seeing the next Taft.

And a name change. I wouldn't vote for Bill Billie, George Georgie, or Barack Barackie. I'm definitely not voting for a Chris Christie.

Great. :D


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: nhmagic on August 11, 2009, 10:54:47 PM
Barack H. Obama 2009 - 2017 (massive takeover of congress by Republicans, aka Clinton 2)
R - Sarah H. Palin 2017 - 2025 (Next Reagan)
R - Whoever Palin picks as VP 2026 - 2031 (who will be defeated in a landslide election by democrats)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 11, 2009, 11:12:07 PM
R - Sarah H. Palin 2017 - 2025 (Next Reagan)

oh god.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 12, 2009, 03:24:55 PM
to 2017       Barack Hussein (D, IL)
2017-2021  Jon Huntsman    (D, UT)
2021-??     

I don't have the Party identification wrong on Huntsman; he will have left or been purged from the Republican Party.  By 2018 the Republican Party will have gone the way of the Federalists and Whigs (or States' Rights at the absolute worst; in 1968 one of its few card-carrying members was James Earl Ray). By 2020 the Democratic Party is so unwieldy that it splits into a Social Democratic Party and a Christian Democratic Party as American politics become more ... European.

LOL, no. The two-party system survived the Democrats' screwing over their pivotal white Southern demographic; it'll survive anything.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on August 12, 2009, 04:30:03 PM
D: Barack Obama 2009-17
R: Charlie Crist  2017-21
D: Andrew Cuomo 2021-

Mitt Romney loses to Obama
Charlie Crist beats Russ Feingold
Andrew Cuomo beats Crist.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 12:03:51 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: nhmagic on August 13, 2009, 12:08:48 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: ajc0918 on August 13, 2009, 12:10:23 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 12:11:45 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.

people think he's gay, so he won't be a good national contender. I don't think he's really a RINO.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: nhmagic on August 13, 2009, 12:12:40 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 12:13:42 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: nhmagic on August 13, 2009, 12:18:22 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 12:18:58 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: ajc0918 on August 13, 2009, 12:20:34 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.

This is how I see it.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: nhmagic on August 13, 2009, 12:20:50 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 12:20:55 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.

This is how I see it.

Do you support Crist or Rubio?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 12:21:31 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: nhmagic on August 13, 2009, 12:24:04 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 12:25:51 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: nhmagic on August 13, 2009, 12:32:47 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 12:33:42 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: nhmagic on August 13, 2009, 12:35:53 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 12:37:30 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: nhmagic on August 13, 2009, 12:40:39 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 12:41:38 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: nhmagic on August 13, 2009, 12:46:54 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 12:48:13 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: nhmagic on August 13, 2009, 12:51:34 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 12:53:24 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: nhmagic on August 13, 2009, 12:58:39 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 12:59:50 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: nhmagic on August 13, 2009, 01:05:47 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mr. Morden on August 13, 2009, 01:39:49 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 13, 2009, 01:50:53 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 02:14:46 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 13, 2009, 02:21:10 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 02:21:43 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 13, 2009, 02:27:19 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 02:28:11 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 13, 2009, 02:32:27 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 02:33:33 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 13, 2009, 02:45:09 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 02:45:44 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 13, 2009, 02:54:07 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 02:54:52 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


Title: Re: spamspamspamspam
Post by: Sewer on August 13, 2009, 02:58:40 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.


Title: Re: spamspamspamspam
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 02:59:28 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.


Title: Re: spamspamspamspam
Post by: Sewer on August 13, 2009, 03:02:39 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.


Title: Live free or not free
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 03:03:26 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on August 13, 2009, 05:01:06 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 13, 2009, 11:47:27 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 11:56:03 AM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 13, 2009, 12:06:31 PM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 12:07:12 PM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 13, 2009, 12:08:32 PM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 12:09:48 PM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 13, 2009, 12:38:07 PM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 12:40:38 PM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on August 13, 2009, 12:58:35 PM
R - Sarah H. Palin 2017 - 2025 (Next Reagan)

Look, I'm not a Reagan fan, but you just offended him horribly


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on August 13, 2009, 01:42:29 PM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 01:45:27 PM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 13, 2009, 02:00:29 PM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.


()


weird...


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 02:03:15 PM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
[/quote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrw as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.




Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 13, 2009, 02:05:04 PM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
[/quote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrw as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.




wtf


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 02:05:34 PM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
[/quote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrw as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.




wtf


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 13, 2009, 02:07:21 PM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
[/quote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrw as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.




wtf
`AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 02:07:46 PM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
[/quote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrw as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.




wtf
`AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 13, 2009, 02:10:14 PM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
[/quote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrw as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.




wtf
`AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

()


not.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 02:12:19 PM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
[/quote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrw as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.


Wtf?

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.




wtf
`AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

()


not.
lol


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on August 13, 2009, 02:19:04 PM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
[/quote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrw as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.


Wtf?

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.




wtf
`AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

()


not.
lol

What's happening here ?? :o


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 02:22:01 PM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
[/quote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrw as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.


Wtf?

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.




wtf
`AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

()


not.
lol

What's happening here ?? :o
idk


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 13, 2009, 03:53:36 PM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
[/quote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrw as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.


Wtf?

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.




wtf
`AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

()


not.
lol

What's happening here ?? :o
idk

my BFF Jill?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on August 13, 2009, 05:47:01 PM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
[/quote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrw as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.


Wtf?

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.





wtf
`AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

()


not.
lol

What's happening here ?? :o
idk

my BFF Jill?

Ok. Now it should work a bit more correctly.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 06:04:41 PM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
[/quote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrw as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.


Wtf?

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.





wtf
`AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

()


not.
lol

What's happening here ?? :o
idk

my BFF Jill?

Ok. Now it should work a bit more correctly.
aite.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 13, 2009, 06:09:29 PM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
[/quote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrw as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.


Wtf?

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.





wtf
`AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

()


not.
lol

What's happening here ?? :o
idk

my BFF Jill?

Ok. Now it should work a bit more correctly.
aite.

[/quote]
[/quote]
gh


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 06:13:08 PM

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.





wtf
`AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

()


not.
lol

What's happening here ?? :o
idk

my BFF Jill?

Ok. Now it should work a bit more correctly.
aite.

gh
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 13, 2009, 06:18:49 PM

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.

Bringing this back to non-messed up territory.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on August 13, 2009, 06:26:47 PM
Quote

45 Mitt Romney
46 Charlie Crist
47 Southern Democrat

I just can't see Crist. Jeb Bush is more likely.
If Crist ever gets put on a national ticket, I would consider going independent.  What a terrible man...

I only disagree with his participation with the stimulus. Why is he thought of as a RINO? Remind me.
Endorsing Obama's package (the stimulus package)

He only endorsed it because the economy in FL is really bad, and no other options were presented to him. It's not like he could say "screw helping FL" for money that would be spent frivolously anyways.
That kind of just makes him a weasel then.  He could have cut spending massively like my state did and even CA, for all the crap that went on with budget reconciliation - though the IOUs are psychotic - did.  Crist is a big spender.

Doesn't make him a RINO. Look at 2000-2006.
I will take a look at that and form a more educated opinion of him.  Though, my liberal buddies just love him to death and that's a warning sign...

Liberals loved McCain, too, until he actually ran against one. then they hated him.
And that's exactly how you tell which candidates not to run in a general election campaign.  Whenever media or anyone in the Democrat party heap lavish praise upon a republican, you know... Even George Soros helped McCain with financial donations during the primary season.

And turncoat Colin Powell did too.
Exactly.  Now Powell is out giving speeches about how the American people WANT to pay more taxes, want more government control.  McCain was exactly the model republican that types like Powell wanted to have in government.  Years from now, both John McCain and Powell will be irrelevant.  They will never have presented a choice, or changed the country for the better and will wash away with all of the moderates of civilization.

I think McCain did a good job as a Senator, but Powell I lost respect for.
McCain can be a fairly good senator when he wants to be and is running for reelection.  Don't kid yourself - the only reason he has been so anti Obama as of late is 1) because he's a bit bitter as senator and 2) because he's up in 2010 for reelection - hence the no on Sotomayor vote

McCain is safe anyways. No primary or Democrat will stop him. He is free to vote as he wishes.
Only retirement - even then, we will likely still have the senate seat.  It is very difficult for a democrat to win statewide here.  They have to be incredibly well funded, incredibly talented at faking moderate or truly being moderate to win.  Napolitano faked moderate and was talented at doing so.  Now as DHS secretary she can let her freak flag fly and show her true inner liberal.

napolitano and sebelius seem very similar to me. But Jon Kyl as Senator is basically proof that AZ is more Republican than people seem to think.
Yep, and so is John Shadegg.  Harry Mitchell has had to vote against several of Obama's bills and he's a democrat.  Kyl could actually be president one day - I doubt it though.

He is a hardline conservative with a voice of reason, not a Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn. I have respect for Jon Kyl.
1. Obama (2009 - 2013)
2. Jon Kyl (2013 - 2021)
3. Robert Byrd aka Kleagle (2021 - 2022)


Wtf?
A decision is made by the democratic party to freeze Robert Byrd cryogenically in his former KKK duds and bring him out on the campaign trail.  The slogan is "Kleagle Kan!".  After winning election, telepaths communicate with his cryotube over a year until one of them accidentally spills their cup of coffee on the plug outlet and short circuits the tube.  The nation mourns.

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.

Bringing this back to non-messed up territory.

Thanks. You're the only civilized person here.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: pogo stick on August 13, 2009, 07:28:04 PM
wtf? that is one hell of a quote.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mr. Morden on August 14, 2009, 12:52:52 AM

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.





wtf
`AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

()


not.
lol

What's happening here ?? :o
idk

my BFF Jill?

Ok. Now it should work a bit more correctly.
aite.

gh
[/quote]
[/quote]

[/quote]

I'm taking this back to messed up territory.  Note how in the innermost quote, it's having to split up short runs of words, like "45 Mitt Romney" into multiple lines.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 14, 2009, 01:08:16 AM

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.





wtf
`AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

()


not.
lol

What's happening here ?? :o
idk

my BFF Jill?

Ok. Now it should work a bit more correctly.
aite.

gh
[/quote]

[/quote]

I'm taking this back to messed up territory.  Note how in the innermost quote, it's having to split up short runs of words, like "45 Mitt Romney" into multiple lines.

[/quote]

thats cool


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 14, 2009, 01:25:12 AM

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.





wtf
`AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

()


not.
lol

What's happening here ?? :o
idk

my BFF Jill?

Ok. Now it should work a bit more correctly.
aite.

gh

[/quote]

I'm taking this back to messed up territory.  Note how in the innermost quote, it's having to split up short runs of words, like "45 Mitt Romney" into multiple lines.

[/quote]

thats cool
[/quote]


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mr. Morden on August 14, 2009, 04:50:01 AM

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.





wtf
`AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

()


not.
lol

What's happening here ?? :o
idk

my BFF Jill?

Ok. Now it should work a bit more correctly.
aite.

gh


I'm taking this back to messed up territory.  Note how in the innermost quote, it's having to split up short runs of words, like "45 Mitt Romney" into multiple lines.


thats cool

Now I'm adding in some links to fake quotes to create confusion as to who said what.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on August 14, 2009, 01:28:37 PM
Just horrible... :s


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 15, 2009, 01:36:43 AM

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.





wtf
`AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

()


not.
lol

What's happening here ?? :o
idk

my BFF Jill?

Ok. Now it should work a bit more correctly.
aite.

gh


I'm taking this back to messed up territory.  Note how in the innermost quote, it's having to split up short runs of words, like "45 Mitt Romney" into multiple lines.


thats cool

Now I'm adding in some links to fake quotes to create confusion as to who said what.



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mechaman on August 16, 2009, 12:12:44 AM

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.
Yes, wouldn't it be hilarious if that happened.  I can even see the democrats being like: "How are you demeaning a man in a cryotube?" There would be a new protest movement that arises called "The Tubers" who will say that Kleagle is in an entirely different cryotube and that democrats placed Rosie O'Donnell within in order to keep her from harming any other poor koosh balls.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.





wtf
`AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

()


not.
lol

What's happening here ?? :o
idk

my BFF Jill?

Ok. Now it should work a bit more correctly.
aite.

gh


I'm taking this back to messed up territory.  Note how in the innermost quote, it's having to split up short runs of words, like "45 Mitt Romney" into multiple lines.


thats cool

Now I'm adding in some links to fake quotes to create confusion as to who said what.



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 16, 2009, 12:42:22 AM

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.





wtf
`AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

()


not.
lol

What's happening here ?? :o
idk

my BFF Jill?

Ok. Now it should work a bit more correctly.
aite.

gh


I'm taking this back to messed up territory.  Note how in the innermost quote, it's having to split up short runs of words, like "45 Mitt Romney" into multiple lines.


thats cool

Now I'm adding in some links to fake quotes to create confusion as to who said what.



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 16, 2009, 12:48:01 AM

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.





wtf
`AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

()


not.
lol

What's happening here ?? :o
idk

my BFF Jill?

Ok. Now it should work a bit more correctly.
aite.

gh


I'm taking this back to messed up territory.  Note how in the innermost quote, it's having to split up short runs of words, like "45 Mitt Romney" into multiple lines.


thats cool

Now I'm adding in some links to fake quotes to create confusion as to who said what.



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 16, 2009, 01:11:48 AM

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.





wtf
`AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

()


not.
lol

What's happening here ?? :o
idk

my BFF Jill?

Ok. Now it should work a bit more correctly.
aite.

gh


I'm taking this back to messed up territory.  Note how in the innermost quote, it's having to split up short runs of words, like "sex" into multiple lines.


thats cool

Now I'm adding in some links to fake quotes to create confusion as to who said what.



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 16, 2009, 01:19:34 AM

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the quotebox even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No link on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This chain shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.





wtf
`AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

()


not.
lol

What's happening here ?? :o
idk

my BFF Jill?

Ok. Now it should work a bit more correctly.
aite.

gh


I'm taking this back to messed up territory.  Note how in the innermost quote, it's having to split up short runs of words, like "sex" into multiple lines.


thats cool

Now I'm adding in some links to fake quotes to create confusion as to who said what.



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 16, 2009, 01:26:12 AM
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the dick even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No dick on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This dick shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.





wtf
`AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

()


not.
lol

What's happening here ?? :o
idk

my BFF Jill?

Ok. Now it should work a bit more correctly.
aite.

gh


I'm taking this back to messed up territory.  Note how in the innermost quote, it's having to split up short runs of words, like "sex" into multiple lines.


thats cool

Now I'm adding in some links to fake quotes to create confusion as to who said what.



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mr. Morden on August 16, 2009, 03:01:26 AM
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the dick even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No dick on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This dick shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

No you're weirds.

no u.

RPP bitches!

Let's be weird together !

Fine With Me.





wtf
`AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

()


not.
lol

What's happening here ?? :o
idk

my BFF Jill?

Now I'm getting a message that says "The message exceeds the maximum allowed length (10000 characters)."  I'm forced to delete text from within the loop.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 16, 2009, 04:16:53 AM
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the dick even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No dick on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This dick shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

Now I'm getting a message that says "The message exceeds the maximum allowed length (10000 characters)."  I'm forced to delete text from within the loop.


     Yeah, that happens.... The loop is more important than the text therein, fortunately.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Phony Moderate on August 16, 2009, 07:55:42 AM
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321

LOL! I remember him saying there are "white n-words too" and right after the interview his office put out an apology ahahaha.

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the dick even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

First red avatar, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was done before somewhere. No dick on me, sorry.

Let's do it again, though.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This dick shall not be broken.......

ok.

So.........

Dude, you're weird.

Now I'm getting a message that says "The message exceeds the maximum allowed length (10000 characters)."  I'm forced to delete text from within the loop.


     Yeah, that happens.... The loop is more important than the text therein, fortunately.



This looks fun.

[/quote]






Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mr. Morden on August 16, 2009, 10:34:43 PM
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the dick even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

Firstr, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was donhough.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This dick shall not be broken.......

ok.

So...

Dude u weird.

Now I'm getting a message that says "The message exceeds the maximum allowed length (10000 characters)."  I'm forced to delete text from within the loop.


     Yeah, that happens.... The loop is more important than the text therein, fortunately.



This looks fun.


It is.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 16, 2009, 11:08:30 PM
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321

I have nothing to add.  I just wanted to make the dick even larger.  IIRC, if you nest enough quotes, it eventually breaks.



O Rly?

Lets find out.

That's not true. It doesn't.

Firstr, woohoo!

have you tried it before?

It was donhough.

might as well. it's after midnight and the mods have better things to worry about.

so.

Dude, you're weird.


yes.


i am.


gkmnbtup.

Why do you switch states and parties everyday?


I Don't Know.

Yes You Do.


But you don't.

Not yet.

Not ever.

I doubt that.

OMG I've never seen so many quotes...

Yup.

This dick shall not be broken.......

ok.

So...

Dude u weird.

Now I'm getting a message that says "The message exceeds the maximum allowed length (10000 characters)."  I'm forced to delete text from within the loop.


     Yeah, that happens.... The loop is more important than the text therein, fortunately.



This looks fun.


It is.



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: big bad fab on August 18, 2009, 05:12:24 AM
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321
Yes.
ever.
ok.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on August 18, 2009, 05:20:52 AM
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321
Yes.
ever.
ok.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mr. Morden on August 18, 2009, 06:10:12 AM
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321
Yes.
ever.
ok.
You shouldn't have edited down "Supercalifragilisticexpialodocious".  The whole point is to have a long word in the innermost quote box, to see what happens when it gets squeezed to death.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on August 18, 2009, 06:45:50 AM
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321
Yes.
ever.
ok.

fixed


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: big bad fab on August 18, 2009, 08:29:08 AM
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321
Yes.
ever.

fixed


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Hash on August 18, 2009, 08:39:35 AM
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321
Yes.
ever.

fixed


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: big bad fab on August 18, 2009, 08:47:18 AM
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321
Yes.
ever.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on August 18, 2009, 08:51:58 AM
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321
Yes.
ever.

:D


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Psychic Octopus on August 18, 2009, 12:19:38 PM
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321
Yes.
ever.

:D

Ah! holy crap! What did you do!


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 18, 2009, 12:41:07 PM
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321
Yes.
ever.

:D

Ah! holy crap! What did you do!


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Middle-aged Europe on August 18, 2009, 02:09:39 PM
2009-2010: Barack Obama (D) - assassinated by a birther during a townhall meeting
2010-2011: Joe Biden (D) - dies of a heart attack
2011-2021: Hillary Clinton (D) - became Biden's vice president
2021-2029: George P. Bush (R) - former governor of Florida


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: minionofmidas on August 18, 2009, 02:22:45 PM
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321
Yes.
ever.
ok.

Oh wow. Never seen that thing before.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 18, 2009, 02:36:13 PM
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321
Yes.
ever.
ok.

Oh wow. Never seen that thing before.

Its cool 8)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 18, 2009, 02:46:29 PM
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321
Yes.
ever.
ok.

Oh wow. Never seen that thing before.

Its cool 8)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 18, 2009, 02:53:31 PM
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321
Yes.
ever.
ok.

Oh wow. Never seen that thing before.

Its cool 8)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Person Man on August 18, 2009, 03:31:40 PM
You're slowing down my computer. So no, I am not playing in your game.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on August 18, 2009, 06:05:20 PM
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321

:D

Ah! holy crap! What did you do!

Hahahahahahahahahaha ! ;D

I love to be evil.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mr. Morden on August 18, 2009, 08:11:21 PM
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321

:D

Ah! holy crap! What did you do!

Hahahahahahahahahaha ! ;D

I love to be evil.

Looks like the long word in the center doesn't get squashed.  It just stretches out the page.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 18, 2009, 08:13:23 PM
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321

:D

Ah! holy crap! What did you do!

Hahahahahahahahahaha ! ;D

I love to be evil.

Looks like the long word in the center doesn't get squashed.  It just stretches out the page.



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: pogo stick on August 18, 2009, 11:18:45 PM
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321

:D

Ah! holy crap! What did you do!

Hahahahahahahahahaha ! ;D

I love to be evil.

Looks like the long word in the center doesn't get squashed.  It just stretches out the page.


Yes, oyu guys aren't bored


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 18, 2009, 11:50:00 PM
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321

:D

Ah! holy crap! What did you do!

Hahahahahahahahahaha ! ;D

I love to be evil.

Looks like the long word in the center doesn't get squashed.  It just stretches out the page.


Yes, oyu guys aren't bored

Oyu?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 19, 2009, 12:14:29 AM
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321
Yes.
ever.
ok.

Oh wow. Never seen that thing before.

Its cool 8)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 19, 2009, 12:16:35 AM
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321
Yes.
ever.
ok.

Oh wow. Never seen that thing before.

Its cool 8)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 19, 2009, 12:31:38 AM
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321
Yes.
ever.
ok.

Oh wow. Never seen that thing before.

Its cool 8)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on August 19, 2009, 07:04:24 AM
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321

Looks like the long word in the center doesn't get squashed.  It just stretches out the page.


And now ?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on August 20, 2009, 08:52:59 AM
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321

Guys, you already stopped making fun ?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 20, 2009, 01:44:37 PM
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321

Guys, you already stopped making fun ?

no


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on August 20, 2009, 02:22:30 PM
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321

Guys, you already stopped making fun ?

no

:D


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 20, 2009, 02:52:28 PM
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321

Guys, you already stopped making fun ?

no

:D


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on August 20, 2009, 04:55:40 PM
STOP THIS PLEASE!

This thread looks horrible


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: RIP Robert H Bork on August 22, 2009, 01:05:56 AM
STOP THIS PLEASE!

This thread looks horrible

Agreed.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on August 28, 2009, 06:44:44 AM
44th: Barack Obama (2009-?)
45th: ?
46th: ?
47th: ?

 :P 


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on August 28, 2009, 01:33:06 PM
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote from:  link=topic=77200.msg2111676#msg2111676 date=1250191321

Guys, you already stopped making fun ?

no

:D


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: H. Ross Peron on August 28, 2009, 07:00:06 PM
David Petreaus (Republican 2017-2025)
Tim Pawlenty (Republican 2025-2033)
[[Democrat]] (Democrat 2033-2037)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on October 05, 2009, 10:49:45 PM
2009-2017 Barack Obama
2017-2021 Brian Schweitzer
2021-2025 Mark Warner


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: HappyWarrior on October 05, 2009, 10:54:33 PM
2009-2017 Barack Obama
2017-2021 Brian Schweitzer
2021-2015 Mark Warner

I think my old buddy ben just creamed his pants  ;) lol


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mr. Morden on October 06, 2009, 03:49:48 AM
2009-2017 Barack Obama
2017-2021 Brian Schweitzer
2021-2015 Mark Warner

Warner is president for negative 6 years?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on October 06, 2009, 06:59:39 PM
Yeesh, didn't realize that I typed "2015" and not "2025."


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on October 29, 2009, 01:39:04 PM
Mike Huckabee (2013-2021)
John Thune (2021-2029)
Unknown Democrat (2029-2033)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: tmthforu94 on October 29, 2009, 02:49:36 PM
Mitt Romney (2013-2021)
Andrew Cuomo (2021-2029)
Bobby Jindal (2029-???)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on October 29, 2009, 09:33:34 PM
2009-2017 Barack Obama
2017-2021 Brian Schweitzer
2021-2015 Mark Warner

I think my old buddy ben just creamed his pants  ;) lol

I'd rather have Warner serve 8 years, than 4 ;)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: ShadowRocket on October 30, 2009, 03:10:52 PM
45. Andrew Cuomo (2017-2021)
46. Kelly Ayotte (2021-2029)
47. Beau Biden (2029-?)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Bacon King on November 15, 2009, 03:08:25 PM
Obama's rise still astounds me. That'd be like me retiring from the U.S. Air Force at 41, running for the State Senate, two years later the U.S. Senate, then four years later being elected President.

Whose got money on me :D

Just so everyone knows, for future posterity, I already had this called!

2016-2024: Rebecca Otto (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebecca_Otto)
2024-2032: Mike Fleck (http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/home/member_information/house_bio.cfm?id=1097)
2032-2036: Michael Naso, Jr. (http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y66/Floydbuster/mike1.jpg)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mechaman on November 15, 2009, 03:50:33 PM
44. Barack Obama (D-IL) 2009-2010
45. Joseph Biden (D-DE) 2010-2017
46. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) 2017-2021
47. Joseph A. Sestak (D-PA) 2021-2029

*Notes
44. Barack Obama dies from a health condition that it unknown at this current time.
45. Joseph Biden becomes the oldest person to ever a) ascend to the presidency and b)be elected to a 1st term as president (age 70 at Inauguration Day)
46. Lisa Murkowski becomes first woman president and first president from Alaska.
47. Joseph A. Sestak, at the age of 69 on Inauguration Day, would become the 3rd oldest President ever elected. If he had waited until 2025 to run he would've become the oldest ever elected for a first term to office.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: jimsnaza on November 23, 2009, 12:16:05 AM
2009-2017: Barack Obama
2017-2021: Gavin Newsom (after running for Senate)
2021-2029: Marco Rubio (after losing for Senate, becomes governor of Florida)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Lahbas on November 23, 2009, 12:29:17 PM
44) Barack Hussein Obama          January 20th 2009 - January 20th 2013
45) Mitchell Elias "Mitch" Daniels, Jr.          January 20th 2013 - January 20th 2021
46) Piyush "Bobby" Jindal          January 20th 2021 - January 20th 2025
47) Thomas Stuart Price "Tom" Perriello          January 20th 2025 - January 20th 2031


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Frodo on November 23, 2009, 10:43:30 PM
Barack Obama (2009-2017)
Jon Huntsman, Jr. (2017-2021)
Russ Feingold (2021-2029)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: k-onmmunist on November 26, 2009, 05:00:30 PM
Some Republican
Some Libertarian
Anarcho-capitalism.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Vepres on November 27, 2009, 12:29:37 AM
44. Barack Obama (2009-2013)
45. Newt Gingrich (2013-2021)
46. Gary Johnson (2021-2029)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on December 13, 2009, 06:34:24 AM
Last Prediction: God has revealed it to be in a dream:

44. Barack Obama       2009-2013
45. Mitt Romney      2013-2017
46. Hillary Clinton      2017-2025
47. Gavin Newsom      2025-2029

Hillary never going to be President. Gee, even Romney have bigger chances for GOP nod.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Bo on December 22, 2009, 01:04:31 PM
Andrew Cuomo (D) 2017-2025
Brian Sandoval (R) 2025-2029
Chelsea Clinton-Mezvinsky (D) 2029-2037


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: GOP732 on December 29, 2009, 07:19:31 PM
45) Sen. Barack Obama/ Sen. Joe Biden (2012-2013)
46) Sen. Jon Kyle/ Sen. Marco Rubio (2013-2017)
47) Frm. Pres. Barack Obama/ Gov. Brian Schweitzer(2017-2021)
48) Sen. Sarah Palin/ Sen. Megan McCain (2021-2029)



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on December 30, 2009, 07:53:01 AM
44 Barack Obama 45 Tim Pawlenty 46 Andrew Cuomo

I would consider to vote for all three of them.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: War on Want on December 30, 2009, 09:36:27 PM
44. Barack Obama (2009-2013)
45. Newt Gingrich (2013-2021)
46. Gary Johnson (2021-2029)
lol


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: I spent the winter writing songs about getting better on December 31, 2009, 12:02:42 AM
44 Barack Obama
45 Al Franken
46 opebo


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: ajc0918 on February 28, 2010, 05:08:44 PM

Al Franken is a joke, literally.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Bo on February 28, 2010, 05:09:54 PM
Andrew Cuomo (2017-2025)
Brian Sandoval (2025-2029)
Chelsea Clinton (2029-2037)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: CatoMinor on February 28, 2010, 05:17:18 PM
Gary Johnson (2013-2021)
Andrew Cuomo (2021-2029)
Aaron Shock (2029-2037)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Bo on February 28, 2010, 05:23:01 PM
Gary Johnson (2013-2021)
Andrew Cuomo (2021-2029)
Aaron Shock (2029-2037)

Three two-termers in a row, eh?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Bo on February 28, 2010, 07:30:59 PM
Andrew Cuomo (2017-2025)
Brian Sandoval (2025-2029)
Chelsea Clinton (2029-2037)

That has to be the oddest I have ever seen. Say that I may be a hack for my list (In reality I think Obama serving to 2017 and Cuomo succeeding him is equally likely, but seriously, from 2009-2037, a Republican serving only ONCE for one term? That seems very, very, very hackish to me.


Well, the GOP controlled the White House for 20 out of 24 years between 1969 and 1993. Also, here's another possibility that might have occured if Gore won in 2000.
It's very realistic.


Bill Clinton/Al Gore (D): 1993-2001
Al Gore/Joe Lieberman (D): 2001-2005
John McCain/Lamar Alexander (R): 2005-2009
Hillary Clinton/Mark Warner (D): 2009-2017
Mark Warner/Evan Bayh (D): 2017-2021

In this scenario, Democrats control the White House for 24 out of 28 years.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Bo on March 22, 2010, 01:06:50 AM
*Assuming HRC doesn't run in 2016

Barack Hussein Obama II (D): 2009-2017
Andrew Cuomo (D): 2017-2025
Paul Ryan (R): 2025-2033
Bobby Jindal (R): 2033-2037


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl on March 22, 2010, 01:07:40 AM
*Assuming HRC doesn't run in 2016

Barack Hussein Obama II (D): 2009-2017
Andrew Cuomo (D): 2017-2025
Paul Ryan (R): 2025-2033

Hahahahaha!

Obama is finished. Stick a fork in him.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Bo on March 22, 2010, 01:11:02 AM
*Assuming HRC doesn't run in 2016

Barack Hussein Obama II (D): 2009-2017
Andrew Cuomo (D): 2017-2025
Paul Ryan (R): 2025-2033

Hahahahaha!

Obama is finished. Stick a fork in him.

I hope the Secret Service don't read this thread of yours.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sewer on March 22, 2010, 02:14:25 AM
*Assuming HRC doesn't run in 2016

Barack Hussein Obama II (D): 2009-2017
Andrew Cuomo (D): 2017-2025
Paul Ryan (R): 2025-2033

Hahahahaha!

Obama is finished. Stick a fork in him.

Obsessed much?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Robespierre's Jaw on March 27, 2010, 12:31:16 AM
45. Reactionary
46. Reactionary
47. Reactionary

Ah, the wonder of American politics, and above all politics of the western world. Where despite bickering and name calling the electorate is still  idiotic enough to perceive differences between the two major parties.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Bo on March 27, 2010, 12:36:16 AM
Barack Obama (Democrat, 2009-2017)
Anointed Successor (Democrat, 2017-2021)
Moderate Crist/Brown-lite (Republican, 2021-2029)

In any case,

Barack Obama (Democrat, 2009-2017)
Hillary Clinton (Democrat, 2017-2021)
Scott Brown (Republican, 2021-2029)

That was my prediction if anyone had to guess.

Please explain why Hillary would only serve one term.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Psychic Octopus on March 27, 2010, 12:36:33 AM
45. Reactionary
46. Reactionary
47. Reactionary

Ah, the wonder of American politics, and above all politics of the western world. Where despite bickering and name calling the electorate is still  idiotic enough to perceive differences between the two major parties.

Come on Conor, have some fun and guess specifics, not general facts... :)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Iosif on March 27, 2010, 03:16:39 AM
45. Michelle Obama
46. Bernie Sanders
47. Al Franken
48. Sasha Obama


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mechaman on March 27, 2010, 09:00:18 AM
45. Reactionary
46. Reactionary
47. Reactionary

Ah, the wonder of American politics, and above all politics of the western world. Where despite bickering and name calling the electorate is still  idiotic enough to perceive differences between the two major parties.

Great list.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on March 27, 2010, 09:40:48 AM
(2013-2021) Mitt Romney
(2021-2025) Barack Obama
(2025-2033) George P. Bush


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mechaman on March 27, 2010, 10:04:48 AM
Palin v. Landrieu?  Do you really the Dems will nominate a moderate who is either out of office or barely winning?  BTW, LOL @ NC, GA, and LA voting Dem

LA did in 1992 and 1996. Also by that time, GA and NC will both have around 10 to 11 million people live in them states, Most from up North moving down because the cost of living is lower and the weather is better.
1.) VT has voted Republican more times any state, in fact up until 1992, I don't know the last time they didn't.  Is it going to be a GOP bastion soon?
2.) More people does not equal more Democratic, Georgia is growing a lot and is moving right

GA isn't moving right or left right now, its holding steady, but I see it being more Democratic at the natonal level, but saying republican at the local level. Also  LA would go Democratic because the Mary is from there, and 99% of the time the candidate wins their home state.
1.) No, you can't argue Georgia is not moving to the right, its a fact not an opinion
2.) Al Gore did incredibly well in TN in 2000

I said 99% of the time. Also Gore was too liberal for TN when he ran.

I know this is old, but I just have to address the idea that 99% of the time presidential candidates win their homestates.  Keep in mind this list doesn't even take into consideration minor tickets (aka those that either didn't get more than 10 electoral votes or got less than 10% of the popular vote), which would make this statement even more wrong.  Keep in mind that a winner could still lose his home state and win the election, so this isn't just limited to losers (though usually if a candidate does lose his home state, he also loses the election).

Major ticket candidates who have lost their homestates in a presidential contest:
1804/1808: Charles C. Pinckney (Federalist Party) (South Carolina)
1816: Rufus King (Federalist Party) (New York)
1836: Willie Person Mangum (Whig Party) (South Carolina)
1840: Martin Van Buren (Democratic Party) (New York)
1844: James K. Polk (Democratic Party) (Tennessee)
1852: Winfield Scott (Whig Party) (New Jersey)
1856: John C. Fremont (Republican Party) (California) and Millard Fillmore (Know Nothing Party) (New York)
1860: Stephen Douglas (Northern Democratic) (Illinois) and John C. Breckenridge (Southern Democratic) (Kentucky)
1872: Horace Greeley (Liberal Republican) (New York)
1880: Winfield Hancock (Democratic Party) (Pennsylvania)
1888: Grover Cleveland (Democratic Party) (New York)
1892: Benjamin Harrison (Republican Party) (Indiana) and James Weaver (Populist) (Iowa)
1900: William J. Bryan (Democratic Party) (Nebraska)
1904: Alton B. Parker (Democratic Party) (New York)
1912: Theodore Roosevelt (Progressive Party) (New York) and William H. Taft (Republican Party) (Ohio)
1920: James M. Cox (Democratic Party) (Ohio)
1924: John W. Davis (Democratic Party) (West Virginia)
1928: Alfred E. Smith (Democratic Party) (New York)
1932: Herbert Hoover (Republican Party) (California)
1936: Alf Landon (Republican Party) (Kansas)
1944: Thomas E. Dewey (Republican Party) (New York)
1952/1956: Adlai Stevenson (Democratic Party) (Illinois)
1972: George McGovern (Democratic Party) (South Dakota)
1992: Ross Perot (Independent) (Texas)
2000: Albert Gore Jr. (Democratic Party) (Tennessee)

Seems a lot more common than just 1% of the time that a candidate loses their home state in an election. Hell, if I included third party tickets that earned less than 1% of the popular vote, it would be more accurate to say that presidential candidates lose their homestate 50% of the time than the joker who says that presidential candidates win their home states 99% of the time.
I mean really, it depends on the candidate and the location.  For example I severely doubt that Mitt Romney could win Massachusetts in a presidential election.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Bo on May 16, 2010, 10:11:42 PM
Stop Spamming!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Joe Biden 2020 on May 17, 2010, 03:51:08 PM
Spamming will NOT be tolerated on my boards.  Thank you.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: yougo1000 on May 20, 2010, 07:21:41 AM
Mitt Romney
Barbara boxer
Scott Brown


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Bo on May 20, 2010, 04:42:11 PM
Mitt Romney
Barbara boxer
Scott Brown

Wrong


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Ameriplan on June 11, 2010, 03:00:11 AM
45. Michelle Obama
46. Bernie Sanders
47. Al Franken
48. Sasha Obama

Ah, what a beautiful vision of the future.

Three pieces of discarded garbage, a comedienne, and a democratic socialist who thought the Democratic Party was a little too right wing for his taste.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: justW353 on June 11, 2010, 09:09:24 AM
45. Michelle Obama
46. Bernie Sanders
47. Al Franken
48. Sasha Obama

Ah, what a beautiful vision of the future.

Three pieces of discarded garbage, a comedienne, and a democratic socialist who thought the Democratic Party was a little too right wing for his taste.

Hm...Discard my previous statement about your posts being "alright"...

Anyone who thinks an eight year old is a "piece of discarded garbage" needs to get their head checked.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Ameriplan on June 11, 2010, 04:26:10 PM
45. Michelle Obama
46. Bernie Sanders
47. Al Franken
48. Sasha Obama

Ah, what a beautiful vision of the future.

Three pieces of discarded garbage, a comedienne, and a democratic socialist who thought the Democratic Party was a little too right wing for his taste.

Hm...Discard my previous statement about your posts being "alright"...

Anyone who thinks an eight year old is a "piece of discarded garbage" needs to get their head checked.

Not now, but I can see into the future and see what that campaign would look like. So yeah.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Derek on June 11, 2010, 04:37:25 PM
Al Franken? I could beat him. Give us Al Franken, the former writer for Playboy. Do it! Nominate Al Franken. LMAO his running mate could be Larry Flint or better yet better yet George Soros. I can see the ads now showing potential playboy parties at OUR WHITE HOUSE. Let the GOP run against him. PLEASE!!!


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Ameriplan on June 12, 2010, 02:27:36 AM
Al Franken? I could beat him. Give us Al Franken, the former writer for Playboy. Do it! Nominate Al Franken. LMAO his running mate could be Larry Flint or better yet better yet George Soros. I can see the ads now showing potential playboy parties at OUR WHITE HOUSE. Let the GOP run against him. PLEASE!!!

lmao, run that ticket against Daniels/Cantor. Stuart Smalley may carry DC, but that's it.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Psychic Octopus on January 18, 2011, 12:57:26 AM
Now that the 2010 elections are over, we can see what the GOP and Democrats have to offer in the following years, so this topic deserves a bump. Time to make some revised lists, people.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: jbgator on January 18, 2011, 01:40:18 AM
Rand Paul (2017 - 2021) - Nikki Haley as VP
Gavin Newsom (2021 - 2025)
Mike Haridopolos (2025 - 2033)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on January 18, 2011, 08:11:44 AM
In my timeline...

Bobby Jindal (R-LA): 2017-2021

Ted Kennedy Jr. (D-CT): 2021-2029

Julian Castro (D-TX): 2029-2033


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: The Economist on January 20, 2011, 10:44:10 PM
For fun:

1. Governor Bobby Jindal (R-Louisiana) - 2017-2025
2. A young governor who comes to prominence during the latter half of the 2010s / early 2020s (Democratic)
3. That governor's Vice President (A Democrat)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Phony Moderate on January 21, 2011, 10:46:11 AM
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D-NY) - 2017-2025
Senator Scott Brown (R-MA) - 2025-2029
Senator Michelle Obama (D-IL) - 2029-2037



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on January 28, 2011, 05:34:38 AM
Barack Obama (2009-2017)
Marco Rubio (2017-2025)
Joe Kennedy (2025-2031)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on January 28, 2011, 11:38:26 AM
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D-NY) - 2017-2025

16 years of one party rule? Yes, keep dreaming ::)

Barack Obama (2009-2017)
Marco Rubio (2017-2025)
Joe Kennedy (2025-2031)

I'm suspecting Naso is living on drugs.

45. Reactionary
46. Reactionary
47. Reactionary

Ah, the wonder of American politics, and above all politics of the western world. Where despite bickering and name calling the electorate is still  idiotic enough to perceive differences between the two major parties.

Rocky won the thread.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: tpfkaw on January 28, 2011, 11:40:11 AM
Mike Huckabee (2013-2017)
Brian Schweitzer (2017-2025)
Scott Brown (2025-2033)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mechaman on January 28, 2011, 12:58:45 PM
Mitchell Elias Daniels (2013-2021) Republican-Indiana
Mark Peter Begich (2021-2023) Democratic-Alaska*
Brendan Conway Neal (2023-2029) Democratic-Massachusetts

*Dies in office


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Bull Moose Base on January 29, 2011, 03:30:34 AM
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D-NY) - 2017-2025

16 years of one party rule? Yes, keep dreaming ::)

The Democrats won 5 terms in a row.  Little later the Republicans won 5 out of 6, which, if it weren't for the butterfly ballot, would have been followed by 4 Democratic terms in a row.  Maybe the White House is like baseball All-Star game streaks and similarly, the last one was a turning point.

Two terms of Hillary after two of Obama doesn't seem all that crazy a pick.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Niemeyerite on January 29, 2011, 07:01:34 AM
Ron Johnson (2017-2021)
Cory Booker (2021-2029)
Aaron Shock (2029-2037)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on January 29, 2011, 07:54:33 AM
Mitchell Elias Daniels (2013-2021) Republican-Indiana
Mark Peter Begich (2021-2023) Democratic-Alaska*
Brendan Conway Neal (2023-2029) Democratic-Massachusetts

*Dies in office

What and unlucky family.

Let me guess... air crash?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Grumpier Than Thou on January 29, 2011, 09:50:25 AM
Mitch Daniels (2013-2021)
Andrew Cuomo (2021-2025)
Rand Paul (2025-2033)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Penelope on February 05, 2011, 03:32:42 PM
Based on what I've seen from this website:

1. Mitch Daniels (2013-Heat Death of the Universe).

Based off of my own gut:

1. Paul Ryan (2017-2021)
2. Julian Castro (2021-2029)
3. Some unknown fiscal conservative from the Rustbelt (2029-?)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mexino Vote on February 05, 2011, 03:52:05 PM
45. Jeb Ellis Bush (R-FL): 2013-2021
46. Andrew Cuomo (D-NY): 2021-2029
47. Kristi Noem (R-SD): 2029-2037



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: RogueBeaver on February 05, 2011, 08:26:40 PM
 Bobby Jindal [R-LA] (2017-2025)
 Marco Rubio [R-FL] (2025-2029)
 Julian Castro [D-TX] (2029-2037)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on February 05, 2011, 09:12:14 PM
My list is the same as Rogue Beaver (who wrote the altenrate history regarding RFK) except Gavin Newson replaces Julian Castro.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Its Evolution Baby on February 13, 2011, 11:24:09 PM
Gov. Mitch Daniels (2013-2021)
Sen. Rand Paul (2021-2029)
Rep. Aaron Schock (2029-2037)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on May 04, 2011, 10:34:00 PM
Barack Obama (2009-2017)
Marco Rubio (2017-2025)
Unknown Democrat (2025-2031)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on May 05, 2011, 09:45:47 AM
Barack Obama(2013-17)
Bobby Jindell (2017-21)
Gov. NJ. Marty Booker (2021-25)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Joe Republic on May 05, 2011, 09:55:04 AM

What connection does he have with New Jersey?  Surely Louisiana would make more sense?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on May 05, 2011, 10:02:51 AM


Is a possibilty or even Governor Sestak, southern populist governors have become boring.



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Joe Republic on May 05, 2011, 10:06:55 AM
... That was an odd way of correcting yourself, but okay.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: King on May 05, 2011, 10:46:15 AM

is my opinon of joe


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Grumpier Than Uncle Joe on May 05, 2011, 11:59:59 AM
(2013-2021) Mitt Romney
(2021-2025) Barack Obama
(2025-2033) George P. Bush

lulz


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: MAINEiac4434 on May 06, 2011, 03:22:19 PM
Barack Obama, D-Illinois (2009-2017)
Marco Rubio, R-Florida  (2017-2021)
Gavin Newsom, D-California (2021-2029)

Sorry if that's already been done before, but that's just what I think. It'll be either Newsom or Corey Booker in 2020.

And for my totally-not-going-to-happen one:

Sarah Palin, R-Alaska(2013-2014) (resigned)
Paul LePage, R-Maine (2014-2017)
Bernie Sanders, I-Vermont (2017-2025)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: milhouse24 on May 15, 2011, 06:12:58 PM
I'm gonna go with:
Romney 2013-2016
Warner 2017-2024
Rubio 2025 -


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: feeblepizza on May 18, 2011, 05:17:18 PM
Mitch Daniels (2013-2021)
Daniels' VP (2021-2029)
Unknown Dem (2029-?)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Horus on May 18, 2011, 07:02:43 PM
Obama (2009-2017)
Rubio (2017-2021)
Klobuchar or Booker (2021-2029)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: PulaskiSkywayDriver on May 19, 2011, 02:46:04 PM
Whats this Klobuchar obsession on here?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: FEMA Camp Administrator on May 19, 2011, 03:17:03 PM
What's with the Democratic opinion that, whoever the Republican is in 2016, he'll be a one termer?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: feeblepizza on May 19, 2011, 05:56:28 PM
What's with the Democratic opinion that, whoever the Republican is in 2016, he'll be a one termer?
They're all hacks.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on May 19, 2011, 07:50:20 PM
Barack Obama(2013-17)
Bobby Jindell (2017-21)
Gov. NJ. Marty Booker (2021-25)

Never heard of Jindell. Who's this man?

But, since you mentioned him, I'm at least sure he's somebody greater than that bore Jindall.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on May 19, 2011, 07:51:06 PM
What's with the Democratic opinion that, whoever the Republican is in 2016, he'll be a one termer?
They're all hacks.

Your list presents a straight four Republican terms. Hence, you are the last person to call anyone a hack.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: feeblepizza on May 19, 2011, 08:17:14 PM
What's with the Democratic opinion that, whoever the Republican is in 2016, he'll be a one termer?
They're all hacks.

Your list presents a straight four Republican terms. Hence, you are the last person to call anyone a hack.
Parties have won the White House for four straight terms in the past.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: FEMA Camp Administrator on May 19, 2011, 08:35:05 PM
What's with the Democratic opinion that, whoever the Republican is in 2016, he'll be a one termer?
They're all hacks.

Your list presents a straight four Republican terms. Hence, you are the last person to call anyone a hack.
Parties have won the White House for four straight terms in the past.

Last time was the FDR/Truman era and that was because of:
Great Depression
Republicans falling into shambles basically
FDR's charisma and popularity
Republicans nominating just plain bad candidates in 1936 and 1940
World War II
An upset in 1945

It was basically the perfect storm for the Democrats, like 1980 turned into the perfect storm for the Republicans, albeit 1980 was to a lesser degree.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: auburntiger on May 19, 2011, 09:28:59 PM
Barack Obama (2009-2017)
Bob McDonnell (2017-2025)
Marco Rubio (2025-2029)
some Democrat we don't know of (2029-2037)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mechaman on May 20, 2011, 09:35:45 AM
What's with the Democratic opinion that, whoever the Republican is in 2016, he'll be a one termer?
They're all hacks.

Your list presents a straight four Republican terms. Hence, you are the last person to call anyone a hack.
Parties have won the White House for four straight terms in the past.

Last time was the FDR/Truman era and that was because of:
Great Depression
Republicans falling into shambles basically
FDR's charisma and popularity
Republicans nominating just plain bad candidates in 1936 and 1940
World War II
An upset in 1945

It was basically the perfect storm for the Democrats, like 1980 turned into the perfect storm for the Republicans, albeit 1980 was to a lesser degree.

Don't you mean 1948?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: mondale84 on May 22, 2011, 04:01:54 PM
Barack Obama 2009-2017

Kirsten Gillibrand 2017-2021

Marco Rubio 2021-2029


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: FEMA Camp Administrator on May 22, 2011, 04:31:26 PM
What's with the Democratic opinion that, whoever the Republican is in 2016, he'll be a one termer?
They're all hacks.

Your list presents a straight four Republican terms. Hence, you are the last person to call anyone a hack.
Parties have won the White House for four straight terms in the past.

Last time was the FDR/Truman era and that was because of:
Great Depression
Republicans falling into shambles basically
FDR's charisma and popularity
Republicans nominating just plain bad candidates in 1936 and 1940
World War II
An upset in 1945

It was basically the perfect storm for the Democrats, like 1980 turned into the perfect storm for the Republicans, albeit 1980 was to a lesser degree.

Don't you mean 1948?

Yeah. :P


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Bo on May 22, 2011, 05:50:55 PM
Current--Barack Obama (2009-2017)

-----------------------

Andrew Cuomo (2017-2021)--loses reelection due to recession
Marco Rubio (2021-2029)
Kirsten Gillibrand (2029-2037)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Lou34679 on May 22, 2011, 06:40:47 PM
Barack Obama: 2013-2017

Marco Rubio: 2017-2021

Some democrat: 2021-2029. Democratic presidents are harder to predict than republicans, in my opinion.



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Dgov on May 22, 2011, 09:34:22 PM
What with the Rubio Love fest all of a sudden?  Sure he's a young and fairly popular Conservative Senator in a swing state, but does that really propel him to the "Next Republican President" slot for so many people here?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: NHI on May 23, 2011, 09:32:09 PM
44. Barack Obama: 2009-2017
45. Hillary Clinton: 2017-2021
46. Marco Rubio:   2021-2029


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Historia Crux on May 23, 2011, 10:08:43 PM
A list, more just something I thought of a possible TL for the future.

44. Barack Obama (D-IL) 2009-2017
45. John Thune (R-SD) 2017-2025
46. Thune VP (R-??) 2025-2029


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: feeblepizza on May 24, 2011, 10:22:24 AM
2009-2017: Obama (D)
2017-2025: Republican (R)
2025-?: Unkown Democrat (D)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: milhouse24 on May 24, 2011, 08:56:11 PM
A list, more just something I thought of a possible TL for the future.

44. Barack Obama (D-IL) 2009-2017
45. John Thune (R-SD) 2017-2025
46. Thune VP (R-??) 2025-2029

Thune still seems like a VP candidate, not yet presidential.  Senators aren't good Presidential candidates. 

But I think Warner can win the presidency in 2016.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Del Tachi on June 23, 2011, 01:52:44 PM
2017-2021: Bob McDonnel (R-VA)/Marco Rubio (R-FL)
2021-2029: Michael Bennet (D-CO)/Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)
2029-2033: Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)/Alexi Giannoulias (D-IL)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: RodPresident on June 23, 2011, 08:28:04 PM
2017-2021: Secretary Kathleen Sebelius /  Former Governor Brian Schweitzer defeats Former Governor Bobby Jindal / Former Governor Mitch Daniels. Republicans are able to gain Pennsylvania and Florida, but Sebelius/Schweitzer ticket brings Montana, Kansas, Missouri and Ohio to Democratic column.
2021-2025:  Former Governor Brian Sandoval/ Former Senator Scott Brown defeats Preident Kathleen Sebelius / Vice President Brian Schweitzer. With his latino appeal, Sandoval is able to get Florida, New Jersey, while Brown helps with victories in New Hampshire, Massachussetts, Maine and Rhode Island.
2025-2033: Senator Vincent Sheheen/Senator Julian Castro defeats Sandoval/Brown (2024) and Scott Brown/ Ben Quayle. Shaheen, who was elected to Lindsey Graham's seat after his teabaggering in 2014, became popular with moderates in south and becomes Senate Minority Leader in 2021, replacing Tim Kaine. and is able to win primaries against former Vice President Schweitzer and Senator Lisa Madigan. Senator Castro, elected after a defeat for Texas governorship in 2014, comes back and defeat Senator Dewhurst in 2018. They are able to become first ticket to win deep south since Carter.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on June 30, 2011, 06:20:43 PM
2017-?: Someone we haven't heard about yet
?-?: Someone we haven't heard about yet
?-?: Someone we haven't heard about yet


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Paul Kemp on August 26, 2011, 12:02:27 PM
Laugh at this in years to come:

46. Mitt Romney (R-MA) 2013-2017
47. Andrew Cuomo (D-NY) 2017-2025
48. who knows


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Grumpier Than Thou on August 27, 2011, 06:12:50 PM
Rand Paul 2017-2025
Amy Klobuchar 2025-2033
Aaron Schock 2033-2041


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Penelope on August 27, 2011, 06:52:34 PM
Barack Obama (D-IL): 2009-2017
Andrew Cuomo (D-NY): 2017-2021
Scott Brown (R-MA): 2021-2029


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: NCeriale on September 01, 2011, 09:39:46 PM
Rick Perry (2013-2017)
Andrew Cuomo (2017-2021)
Marco Rubio (2021- ?)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on January 25, 2012, 07:11:45 AM
1. Barack Obama (2009-2017)
2. Chris Christie (2017-2021)
3. Virg Bernero (2021-2029)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: TNF on January 25, 2012, 01:10:14 PM
44. Barack Obama (D) 2009-2017
45. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D) 2017-2025
46. Marco Rubio (R) 2025-2033


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: traininthedistance on January 25, 2012, 03:59:06 PM
Barack Obama/Joe Biden: 2009-2017
Marco Rubio/Mitch Daniels: 2017-2021
John Hickenlooper/Kirsten Gillibrand: 2021-2029

In detail:

Obama/Biden squeak it out in 2012, helped by a protracted Gingrich/Romney fight that sends both of their negatives sky-high. Gary Johnson sets a high-water mark for the Libertarians with something like 5 percent of the vote, his campaign hits Republicans worse but he gets a sizable number of protest votes from the left as well.

In 2016, voter fatigue from 8 years of Obama, Rubio's inroads among Hispanics, and deep left-wing dislike of the horrible Andrew Cuomo lead to an absolute bloodbath in the Electoral College.  Some Nader-like figure does even better than Gary Johnson, and even manages to win Vermont.

In 2020, people revolt against GOP overreach, climate change has finally gotten too bad to ignore, the Dems nominate better candidates, and take back the White House (the House and Senate both flip Dem in 2018 after a long period of mostly R control).


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: tallguy23 on January 25, 2012, 09:39:10 PM
Barack Obama until 2016
John Thune until 2020
A female Democrat after that


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: morgieb on January 26, 2012, 07:51:30 AM
Obama
Christie
nfi


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Jerseyrules on January 26, 2012, 08:44:09 PM
Hopefully:
1. Ron Paul (2013-2021)
2. Robert "Piyush" Jindal (2021-2029)
3. Andrew Cuomo (2029-?)

Realistically:

1. Mitt Romney (2013-2021)
2. Rand Paul (2021-2025)
3. Andrew Cuomo (2025-2029)
4. Marco Rubio (2029-2037)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Indy Prez on January 29, 2012, 03:48:11 PM
Joe Biden
Mario Cuomo
Marco Rubio

Gotta love the poetry of the latter two


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Reaganfan on January 29, 2012, 03:57:56 PM

Mitt Romney (2013-2017)
Andrew Cuomo (2017-2021)
Rick Santorum (2021-2029)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on January 29, 2012, 05:08:50 PM

lol


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian. on January 30, 2012, 12:23:26 AM
2017-2021--Chris Christie
2021-2025--John Hickenlooper
2025-1115985--Deth-Tron the Mutilator


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: LastVoter on January 30, 2012, 01:40:33 AM
Dem Hackery
(now-2016)Obama
(2017-2024)Warren
(2025-2032)Levi Sanders(Bernie's son)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Spamage on January 30, 2012, 01:43:51 AM
Romney 2013-2017
Cuomo 2017-2021
Rubio 2021-2029


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Is Totally Not Feeblepizza. on January 30, 2012, 12:25:54 PM
2013-2021: Mitt Romney
2021-2025: Romney's veep
2025-???: Some Democrat we've never heard of

-OR-

2017-???: Tim Kaine/Andrew Cuomo/etc.
??-???: Some Republican we've never heard of (maaaaaybe someone first elected in 2010)
??-???: ??

Realistically, all I can come up with is a bunch of question marks.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Indy Prez on February 04, 2012, 01:27:18 PM
2025-1115985--Deth-Tron the Mutilator

Disguised as Samuel the Plumber's Assistant (maybe we should have a few President's with honorific titles before we elect this guy). This is probably the most frighteningly perceptive prediction made on this board. 


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Middle-aged Europe on February 04, 2012, 04:41:33 PM
2017-2021: Newt Gingrich (R)
2021-2029: Alejandro García Padilla (D)
2029-2037: George P. Bush (R)

You read it here first. :P


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Stand With Israel. Crush Hamas on February 04, 2012, 09:23:44 PM
Mitt Romney - 2013-2017
Andrew Cuomo - 2017-2025
Kelly Ayotte - 2025-2033


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Joe Biden is your president. Deal with it. on August 22, 2012, 06:42:42 PM
44.Barack Obama(D) 2009-2017
45.Hillary Clinton(D) 2017-2025
46.Stephanie Herseth Sandlin(D) 2025-2033
47.Some old GOP dude 2033-????


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: renegadedemocrat on September 10, 2012, 10:15:18 PM
Obama wins re-election, then

2017-2025: Brian Schweitzer (D)
2025-2033: Marco Rubio (R)
2033-2037: Alexi Giannoulias (D)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Person Man on September 10, 2012, 11:23:49 PM
2017-2021--Chris Christie
2021-2025--John Hickenlooper
2025-1115985--Deth-Tron the Mutilator

Is he related to Brawndo the Thirst Mutilator?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Maxwell on September 10, 2012, 11:56:16 PM
2017-2021 Chris Christie
2021-2025 Andrew Cuomo
2025-2029 Chris Christie

CHRIS CHRISTIE IS... GROVER CLEVELAND.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on September 11, 2012, 11:19:17 AM
In my timeline:

Jan. 20th, 2009-Jan. 20th, 2017: Barack Obama (D)
Jan. 20th, 2017-July 25th, 2019: Chris Christie (R)
July 25th, 2019-January 20th, 2025: Condoleeza Rice (R)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: HagridOfTheDeep on September 11, 2012, 11:56:57 AM
President Barack Obama 2009-2017
Vice President Joe Biden 2017-2021
Senator Susana Martinez 2021-2025


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Grumpier Than Thou on September 11, 2012, 02:57:19 PM
Obama wins re-election:

Marco Rubio 2017-2025
Martin O'Malley 2025-2029
Susana Martinez 2029-2037

Obama loses re-election:

Mitt Romney 2013-2021
Russ Feingold 2021-2029
Susana Martinez 2029-2037


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: BM on September 11, 2012, 03:40:45 PM
In my timeline:

Jan. 20th, 2009-Jan. 20th, 2017: Barack Obama (D)
Jan. 20th, 2017-July 25th, 2019: Chris Christie (R)
July 25th, 2019-January 20th, 2025: Condoleeza Rice (R)
Heart attack?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY on September 11, 2012, 04:28:25 PM
Obama, Christie, Booker.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on September 11, 2012, 06:30:36 PM
In my timeline:

Jan. 20th, 2009-Jan. 20th, 2017: Barack Obama (D)
Jan. 20th, 2017-July 25th, 2019: Chris Christie (R)
July 25th, 2019-January 20th, 2025: Condoleeza Rice (R)
Heart attack?

Yes, actually.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY on September 11, 2012, 06:44:27 PM
I think it's fairly likely that the party who wins in 2012 will relinquish power in 2016. And since I'd rate 2012 a toss-up, I'll make two lists, naming the winners of 2012, 2016, and 2020.

44. Barack Obama (2009-2017)
45. Paul Ryan (2017-2021)
46. Andrew Cuomo (2021-)

44. Mitt Romney (2013-2017)
45. Andrew Cuomo (2017-2021)
46. Ted Cruz (2021-)

Three one-termers?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Psychic Octopus on September 11, 2012, 06:55:27 PM
I think it's fairly likely that the party who wins in 2012 will relinquish power in 2016. And since I'd rate 2012 a toss-up, I'll make two lists, naming the winners of 2012, 2016, and 2020.

44. Barack Obama (2009-2017)
45. Paul Ryan (2017-2021)
46. Andrew Cuomo (2021-)

44. Mitt Romney (2013-2017)
45. Andrew Cuomo (2017-2021)
46. Ted Cruz (2021-)

Three one-termers?

Yep. If we didn't have 9/11, or Gore won in 2000, it's possible we could be on our way to having three one-termers by 2012 (since the only thing Obama has going for him right now is his favorable rating and a mediocre opponent. If he had the personality of Gore or Kerry, he would not be leading right now), and it is highly likely that if either of those two scenarios occurred, the Obama's career would be set back.

For example:

Bush (2001-2005)
Kerry (2005-2009)
Romney (2009-2013)

Gore (2001-2005)
McCain (2005-2009)
Hillary (2009-2013)

It doesn't seem too implausible, though Hillary would have probably been a more effective president, her favorability rating would be awful compared to Obama's today, as it is only high because she is in a non-partisan position.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: 5280 on September 11, 2012, 07:03:02 PM
45. Mitt Romney (R) 2013-2017
46. Mitt Romney (I) 2017-2021
47. Mitt Romney (Android 4.0) 2021-2025
48. Mitt Romney (Middle Class Party) 2025-2029

/sarc


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Talleyrand on September 11, 2012, 07:48:09 PM
In my timeline:

Jan. 20th, 2009-Jan. 20th, 2017: Barack Obama (D)
Jan. 20th, 2017-July 25th, 2019: Chris Christie (R)
July 25th, 2019-January 20th, 2025: Condoleeza Rice (R)

How does Christie/die resign?

And does Rice lose in 2024 or retire?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY on September 11, 2012, 07:53:31 PM
In my timeline:

Jan. 20th, 2009-Jan. 20th, 2017: Barack Obama (D)
Jan. 20th, 2017-July 25th, 2019: Chris Christie (R)
July 25th, 2019-January 20th, 2025: Condoleeza Rice (R)

How does Christie/die resign?

And does Rice lose in 2024 or retire?

Heart attack and I'm presuming Republican fatigue.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on September 14, 2012, 12:04:12 PM
In my timeline:

Jan. 20th, 2009-Jan. 20th, 2017: Barack Obama (D)
Jan. 20th, 2017-July 25th, 2019: Chris Christie (R)
July 25th, 2019-January 20th, 2025: Condoleeza Rice (R)

How does Christie/die resign?

And does Rice lose in 2024 or retire?

Heart attack and defeat.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mr. Morden on March 18, 2015, 05:08:19 AM
*bump*

Barack Obama (2009-2013)
Newt Gingrich (2013-2017)
Barack Obama (2017-2021)
John Thune (2021-2029)

Obama is 44...and 46. :P

Yep.

How about this?

Barack Obama (2009-2013)
Mike Huckabee (2013-2017)

Ummmm….

()

Quote
Brian Schweitzer (2017-2025)

Ummmm….

()

Quote
Aaron Schock (2025-2033)

Ummmm….

()


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: MATTROSE94 on March 18, 2015, 10:05:28 AM
Hillary Clinton/Martin Heinrich (2017-21)*
Rand Paul/Larry Hogan (2021-29)
Larry Hogan/Cory Gardner (2029-33)**

*opts not to run for reelection.
**loses reelection due to effects of a minor recession occurring in 2030-31.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: NeverAgain on March 18, 2015, 11:35:27 PM
Ben Carson predicted it and Obama will declare martial law, and cause mass genocide of the opposite party making him the only potential contender. And after eating the constitution, and the 22nd amendment. He wins the next 9 elections 538-0. My List:

1. Barack Hussein Obama - 2009 - 2039

2. Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama - 2039 - 2047

3. Cyborg Hillary Clinton - 2047 - 3055*

* - Hillary Clinton loses popularity after RoboWater



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Thunderbird is the word on March 19, 2015, 12:13:58 AM
45. Hillary Rodham Clinton 2017-2021

Is unable to achieve much domestically due to gridlock and her presidency is largely focused on foreign policy with US troops deployed to Syria and a ratcheted up bombing campaign against ISIS in Iraq. Is forced to deal with an increasingly bellicose Israel thanks to Netenyahu's becoming more emboldened following his victory in 2015. Israel attacks Iran and Iran launches cruise missiles at Tel Aviv. Europe is also growing increasingly xenophobic with a National Front government in France attempting to impose harsh anti-muslim laws and scattered terrorist attacks in Berlin, Paris and London. Shortly before the 2018 midterm elections which see slight Republican gains Ruth Bader Ginsberg dies. After several Republican filibusters in 2019 of her supreme court nominee she pushes through an unpopular recess appointment. The economy sets into a deep recession due to instability in Europe and the oil market and in 2020 Rand Paul, the runner-up from 2016 defeats Tom Cotton and Rob Portman in the GOP primaries and with former Michigan governor Rick Snyder as his running mate cruises to a landslide victory with the country in an isolationist mood, also runs to her left on civil liberties.

46. Rand Paul 2021-2025

Despite winning election largely on the basis of his anti-war and pro-Civil liberties stance Rand Paul realizes that with increased Republican majorities in both houses he first has to make moves which will appease the Republican base. In 2021 he successfully manages to slash taxes on all Americans, with the top bracket lowered to 15%, enacts a national right to work law and pushes to abolish the Department of Education. In 2022 with the economy having worsened and the Democratic base emboldened Democrats manage to take back both houses of congress. Sensing defeat Paul in his 2023 state of the union address attempts to reach out to civil libertarians in both parties to abolish the Patriot Act and reign in NSA spying. In the summer of 2023 the NSA Reform Act passes the senate, co-sponsored by Sheena Bellows (D)-Maine and Mike Lee (R)-Utah and Paul signs it in perhaps the biggest domestic accomplishment of his presidency.

47. Martin Heinrich 2025-2033

The junior senator from New Mexico manages to emerge as the dark horse candidate out of a crowded Democratic field in 2024, running largely on the issue of climate change. Many see him as a more charismatic version of Al Gore. Although Rand Paul's stance on civil liberties received praise from some on the left, most of the Democratic Party united against him for his staunchly conservative economic agenda, at the same time he was badly damaged by a primary challenge from Tom Cotton who much like Pat Buchanan in 1992 managed to channel the anger of many conservatives within the GOP. Cotton received strong support from both neocons and the christian right and won several southern primaries. With Julian Castro as his running mate Heinrich won by a fairly comfortable margin, attacking the GOP for being anti-science and promising to sign sweeping climate legislation into law and restore many of the programs that Republicans had cut.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Del Tachi on March 19, 2015, 10:02:14 PM
45.  Scott Walker (R-WI) / Kelly Ayotte (R-NH); 2017-2021
46.  Andrew Cuomo (D-NY) / Kamala Harris (D-CA); 2021-2029
47.  George P. Bush (R-TX) / Adam Putnam (R-FL); 2029 - 2033


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: IceSpear on March 19, 2015, 10:30:52 PM
Clinton
Cotton
Some Democrat who nobody knows/cares about now


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Thunderbird is the word on March 20, 2015, 02:55:13 AM
45.  Scott Walker (R-WI) / Kelly Ayotte (R-NH); 2017-2021
46.  Andrew Cuomo (D-NY) / Kamala Harris (D-CA); 2021-2029
47.  George P. Bush (R-TX) / Adam Putnam (R-FL); 2029 - 2033

Walker, Cuomo, Bush....somebody kill me please


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Thunderbird is the word on March 20, 2015, 02:58:05 AM
45.  Scott Walker (R-WI) / Kelly Ayotte (R-NH); 2017-2021
46.  Andrew Cuomo (D-NY) / Kamala Harris (D-CA); 2021-2029
47.  George P. Bush (R-TX) / Adam Putnam (R-FL); 2029 - 2033

Walker, Cuomo, Bush....somebody kill me please


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: MATTROSE94 on March 20, 2015, 09:43:01 AM
Clinton
Cotton
Some Democrat who nobody knows/cares about now
Do you have Tom Cotton winning in 2020 or 2024?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: solarstorm on March 20, 2015, 09:58:28 AM
45. Buddy Roemer
46. Martin O'Malley
47. Jenna Bush Hager


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: The Other Castro on March 20, 2015, 02:13:16 PM
Fmr. Secretary Hillary Clinton 2017-2021 (declines to run for 2nd term)
Fmr. Governor Brian Sandoval 2021-2029
Governor Joaquín Castro 2029-2037


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: m4567 on March 22, 2015, 09:03:58 AM
Hillary Rodham Clinton 2017-2021
John Kasich 2021-2025
Unknown democrat 2025-2033


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mr. Illini on March 26, 2015, 12:07:31 PM
Hillary Rodham Clinton (2017-2021)
Marco Antonio Rubio (2021-2029)
Joseph Patrick Kennedy III (2029-2035)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: JonathanSwift on March 26, 2015, 12:10:40 PM
Joseph Patrick Kennedy III (2029-2035)

Another Kennedy assassination?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mr. Illini on March 26, 2015, 12:18:13 PM

Should read 2037* :/


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: JonathanSwift on March 26, 2015, 12:42:27 PM

Oh, okay then.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: hopper on March 26, 2015, 01:26:00 PM
45. Hillary Rodham Clinton 2017-2021

Is unable to achieve much domestically due to gridlock and her presidency is largely focused on foreign policy with US troops deployed to Syria and a ratcheted up bombing campaign against ISIS in Iraq. Is forced to deal with an increasingly bellicose Israel thanks to Netenyahu's becoming more emboldened following his victory in 2015. Israel attacks Iran and Iran launches cruise missiles at Tel Aviv. Europe is also growing increasingly xenophobic with a National Front government in France attempting to impose harsh anti-muslim laws and scattered terrorist attacks in Berlin, Paris and London. Shortly before the 2018 midterm elections which see slight Republican gains Ruth Bader Ginsberg dies. After several Republican filibusters in 2019 of her supreme court nominee she pushes through an unpopular recess appointment. The economy sets into a deep recession due to instability in Europe and the oil market and in 2020 Rand Paul, the runner-up from 2016 defeats Tom Cotton and Rob Portman in the GOP primaries and with former Michigan governor Rick Snyder as his running mate cruises to a landslide victory with the country in an isolationist mood, also runs to her left on civil liberties.

46. Rand Paul 2021-2025

Despite winning election largely on the basis of his anti-war and pro-Civil liberties stance Rand Paul realizes that with increased Republican majorities in both houses he first has to make moves which will appease the Republican base. In 2021 he successfully manages to slash taxes on all Americans, with the top bracket lowered to 15%, enacts a national right to work law and pushes to abolish the Department of Education. In 2022 with the economy having worsened and the Democratic base emboldened Democrats manage to take back both houses of congress. Sensing defeat Paul in his 2023 state of the union address attempts to reach out to civil libertarians in both parties to abolish the Patriot Act and reign in NSA spying. In the summer of 2023 the NSA Reform Act passes the senate, co-sponsored by Sheena Bellows (D)-Maine and Mike Lee (R)-Utah and Paul signs it in perhaps the biggest domestic accomplishment of his presidency.

47. Martin Heinrich 2025-2033

The junior senator from New Mexico manages to emerge as the dark horse candidate out of a crowded Democratic field in 2024, running largely on the issue of climate change. Many see him as a more charismatic version of Al Gore. Although Rand Paul's stance on civil liberties received praise from some on the left, most of the Democratic Party united against him for his staunchly conservative economic agenda, at the same time he was badly damaged by a primary challenge from Tom Cotton who much like Pat Buchanan in 1992 managed to channel the anger of many conservatives within the GOP. Cotton received strong support from both neocons and the christian right and won several southern primaries. With Julian Castro as his running mate Heinrich won by a fairly comfortable margin, attacking the GOP for being anti-science and promising to sign sweeping climate legislation into law and restore many of the programs that Republicans had cut.

This is a very good prediction except for Hillary's recess appointment to the Supreme Court. The GOP didn't even filibuster any of Obama's Supreme Court Nominees.

Rand Paul-He tries to go back to 1981-1989 Reagan Tax Rates(a 25-28% top tax rate) before Bush H.W. in 1990 reneged on his "No New Taxes Pledge". US Senate Dems block Paul's "Tax Reform" and say his "Tax Reform" is a gift to America's Wealthiest. Don't see a "National Right To Work Law" in his presidency either. I don't think Paul will abolish "The Department of Education" but I think he will somehow give states more leeway in Education Policy somehow and take away some of the Departments power. Again I don't know how will this work.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: ChainsawJedis on April 02, 2015, 09:46:26 PM
Former Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (2017-2025)
Sen.Tom Bryant Cotton (2025-2029)
Sen. Joseph Patrick Kennedy III (2029-2037)
Vice President. Joaquin Castro (2037-2045)

Threw in a 4th because a Kennedy/Castro ticket makes sense to me and the irony would be too real.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Horus on April 03, 2015, 07:40:27 PM
Here's a shot in the dark..

Hillary (2017-2021)
Paul (2021-2025)
Gillibrand (2025-2033)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Vega on April 03, 2015, 10:20:05 PM
This thread's first couple of pages reminded me of how popular and big Mark Warner was in 2008.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: H. Ross Peron on April 03, 2015, 10:41:34 PM
Clinton (D, 2017-2025)
Cotton (R, 2025-2029)
Moulton (D, 2025-2033)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mister Mets on April 04, 2015, 09:51:42 AM
45. Jeb Bush 2017-2025

46. Kamala Harris 2025-2033

47. Some Republican who has yet to be elected to office. 2033-2041



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: bobloblaw on April 10, 2015, 05:58:43 PM
45. Jeb Bush 2017-2025

46. Kamala Harris 2025-2033

47. Some Republican who has yet to be elected to office. 2033-2041



So youre saying that from 1993-2043 there will be 50 years of nothing but two term presidents


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Thunderbird is the word on April 10, 2015, 06:31:36 PM
45. Hillary Rodham Clinton 2017-2021

Is unable to achieve much domestically due to gridlock and her presidency is largely focused on foreign policy with US troops deployed to Syria and a ratcheted up bombing campaign against ISIS in Iraq. Is forced to deal with an increasingly bellicose Israel thanks to Netenyahu's becoming more emboldened following his victory in 2015. Israel attacks Iran and Iran launches cruise missiles at Tel Aviv. Europe is also growing increasingly xenophobic with a National Front government in France attempting to impose harsh anti-muslim laws and scattered terrorist attacks in Berlin, Paris and London. Shortly before the 2018 midterm elections which see slight Republican gains Ruth Bader Ginsberg dies. After several Republican filibusters in 2019 of her supreme court nominee she pushes through an unpopular recess appointment. The economy sets into a deep recession due to instability in Europe and the oil market and in 2020 Rand Paul, the runner-up from 2016 defeats Tom Cotton and Rob Portman in the GOP primaries and with former Michigan governor Rick Snyder as his running mate cruises to a landslide victory with the country in an isolationist mood, also runs to her left on civil liberties.

46. Rand Paul 2021-2025

Despite winning election largely on the basis of his anti-war and pro-Civil liberties stance Rand Paul realizes that with increased Republican majorities in both houses he first has to make moves which will appease the Republican base. In 2021 he successfully manages to slash taxes on all Americans, with the top bracket lowered to 15%, enacts a national right to work law and pushes to abolish the Department of Education. In 2022 with the economy having worsened and the Democratic base emboldened Democrats manage to take back both houses of congress. Sensing defeat Paul in his 2023 state of the union address attempts to reach out to civil libertarians in both parties to abolish the Patriot Act and reign in NSA spying. In the summer of 2023 the NSA Reform Act passes the senate, co-sponsored by Sheena Bellows (D)-Maine and Mike Lee (R)-Utah and Paul signs it in perhaps the biggest domestic accomplishment of his presidency.

47. Martin Heinrich 2025-2033

The junior senator from New Mexico manages to emerge as the dark horse candidate out of a crowded Democratic field in 2024, running largely on the issue of climate change. Many see him as a more charismatic version of Al Gore. Although Rand Paul's stance on civil liberties received praise from some on the left, most of the Democratic Party united against him for his staunchly conservative economic agenda, at the same time he was badly damaged by a primary challenge from Tom Cotton who much like Pat Buchanan in 1992 managed to channel the anger of many conservatives within the GOP. Cotton received strong support from both neocons and the christian right and won several southern primaries. With Julian Castro as his running mate Heinrich won by a fairly comfortable margin, attacking the GOP for being anti-science and promising to sign sweeping climate legislation into law and restore many of the programs that Republicans had cut.

This is a very good prediction except for Hillary's recess appointment to the Supreme Court. The GOP didn't even filibuster any of Obama's Supreme Court Nominees.

Rand Paul-He tries to go back to 1981-1989 Reagan Tax Rates(a 25-28% top tax rate) before Bush H.W. in 1990 reneged on his "No New Taxes Pledge". US Senate Dems block Paul's "Tax Reform" and say his "Tax Reform" is a gift to America's Wealthiest. Don't see a "National Right To Work Law" in his presidency either. I don't think Paul will abolish "The Department of Education" but I think he will somehow give states more leeway in Education Policy somehow and take away some of the Departments power. Again I don't know how will this work.

Good thinking. I'll keep that in mind as I've been thinking about expand ingot his into a timeline.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: ViaActiva on April 11, 2015, 01:01:51 PM
Scott Walker (R): 2017-2021
Kirsten Gillibrand (D): 2021-2025
Martha McSally (R): 2025-2033


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sir Mohamed on April 12, 2015, 07:17:53 AM
Hillary Clinton (2017-2021)
Jeff Flake (2021-2025)
Gavin Newsom (2025-2033)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on April 12, 2015, 07:28:02 AM
Hillary Rodham Clinton (2017-2021)* retires
Julian Castro  (2021-2025) VP Castro takes over

George P Bush (2025-2029)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: ElectionsGuy on April 12, 2015, 08:11:27 AM
Might as well take a shot.

Scott Walker: 2017-2025
Gavin Newsom: 2025-2029 (defeated)
Tom Cotton: 2029-2033 (defeated)

or this...

Hillary Clinton: 2017-2021 (defeated)
Cory Gardner: 2021-2029
Ruben Gallego: 2029-2037

Could be anything really. Its really fun to think about and predict future Senators, governors, etc. rising.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on April 12, 2015, 02:33:16 PM
Hillary Clinton (2017-2021)
A Republican (2021-2025)
A Democrat (2025-2033)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: ChainsawJedis on April 13, 2015, 09:52:23 PM
Hillary Rodham Clinton (2017-2021)* retires
Julian Castro  (2021-2025) VP Castro takes over

George P Bush (2025-2029)

Are you saying Clinton runs in 2020 and then with the election won she retires and Castro takes over, or that she decides not to seek a second term and Castro wins the 2020 election?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: RINO Tom on April 13, 2015, 10:32:21 PM
Hillary Clinton (D-NY): 2017-2025

Brian Sandoval (R-NV): 2025-2033

Cory Gardner (R-CO): 2033-2037


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Skill and Chance on April 14, 2015, 12:33:45 AM
Leaning this way:

Hillary Clinton (2017-2021) (retires)
Brian Sandoval (2021-29)
Jared Polis (2029-37) (2nd term ends in disgrace)

But also think something like this is quite possible:

Scott Walker (2017-21)
Elizabeth Warren (2021-29) (largest win since Reagan in 2024)
Patrick Murphy (2029-33)





Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: TPL99 on June 21, 2015, 08:16:35 PM
45: 2017-2025: Hillary Clinton (D-NY)
46: 2025-2029: Tom Cotton (R-AR)
47: 2029-: Joe Kennedy III (D-MA)

or

45: 2017-2021: Bernie Sanders (D-VT) (retires)
46: 2021-2029: Marco Rubio (R-FL)
47: 2029-: Kamala Harris (D-CA)

or

45: 2017-2021: Martin O'Malley (D-MD) (defeated in '20)
46: 2021-2025: Scott Walker (R-WI) (defeated in '24)
47: 2025-: Bill de Blasio (D-NY)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Crumpets on June 22, 2015, 03:51:14 PM
45: 2017-2025: Clinton/Heinrich (Clinton easily wins nomination, beats Bush modestly in '16 and Martinez strongly in '20)
46: 2025-2029: Sandoval/Thune (Sandoval defeats Clinton VP Heinrich soundly after 16 years of Democrats in the White House)
47: 2029-2033: Harris/Castro (After a tough primary between Harris, Castro, and Gilibrand, Harris chooses Castro as her running mate and goes on to unseat President Sandoval, despite his moderate popularity, due to economic and foreign policy troubles)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Yelnoc on June 22, 2015, 06:07:24 PM
45. Jeb Bush (2017-2021) [1]
46. Kamala Harris (2021-2029) [2]
47. Joaquin Castro (2029-2033) [3]

[1] Or some other Republican. Hillary is going to flop. Whoever wins in 2016 will have to deal with the next recession, and will be clobbered running for reelection in 2020.

[2] Senator Harris becomes the first female President and running mate Joaquin Castro becomes the first latino Vice President.

[3] Though his brother Julian's career stalled after joining Obama's cabinet, Joaquin timed his rise perfectly to become Harris's running mate and eventual successor.

Just for fun, the elections:

2016: Hillary Clinton v. Jeb Bush
2020: Jeb Bush v. Kamala Harris
2024: Kamala Harris v. John Kasich [4]
2028: Joaquin Castro v. Tom Cotton

[4] Assumes Kasich is Bush's main opposition in 2016 and hangs around as Heir Apparent like McCain, maybe getting elected to the senate to pass the time in between.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: 100% pro-life no matter what on June 23, 2015, 05:11:12 PM
Gov. Scott Walker/Gov. Susana Martinez (2017-2025)
VP Susana Martinez/Gov. Marco Rubio (2025-2029)
Gov. Andrew Cuomo/A young (Socialist) Dem Senator (2029-2037)
Gov. George P. Bush/Sen. Tom Cotton (2037-2045)
Sen. Matt Walker/ Some random GOPer we don't know yet (2045-2053)

Elections:
2016: Scott Walker over Hillary Clinton
2020: Scott Walker over Elizabeth Warren
2024: Susana Martinez over Alan Grayson
2028: Andrew Cuomo over Marco Rubio (Pres. Martinez decides not to run)
2032: Andrew Cuomo over Rand Paul
All subsequent losers are as of yet unknown (and remember that I have a ton of names of young Republicans who could rise, but almost no Democrats).


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Leinad on June 23, 2015, 10:44:20 PM
I'll probably look back and laugh 6 months from now, but hey, why not give it a go?

45. Gov. Scott Walker - Sen. Marco Rubio (2017-2025)
46. Sen. Julian Castro - Sen. Kamala Harris (2025-2029)
47. Gov. Susana Martinez - Sen. Rand Paul (2029-2033)
48. VP Kamala Harris - Currently Unknown Democrat (2033-2041)
49. Speaker Justin Amash - Sen./Gov. Leinad [lastname] (me) (2041-2049)

Elections:
2016: Walker over Clinton easily. Why easily? The vote is split when many liberals write-in Hillary's VP, Elizabeth Warren, instead of her.
2020: Walker (narrowly) over Warren/Cuomo.
2024: Castro over Rubio/Cotton.
2028: Martinez over Castro/Harris.
2032: Harris over Martinez/Paul.
2036: Harris over Thomas Massie/Currently Unknown Republican.
2040: Amash over two unknown Democrats. By this point, as you can tell, the Republican party is broadly Libertarian. After his defeat as VP, Rand Paul now re-enters the Senate and, as his positions are equal to the party platform, becomes the majority leader. My inclusion of myself as VP is probably wishful thinking. Fun fact: I share a birthday with Justin Amash.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on June 24, 2015, 05:41:14 AM
Hilary Rodham😍(2017-2025)
Patrick Murphy (2025-2029)
Some GOP candidate(2029-2035)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Simfan34 on June 24, 2015, 07:09:02 PM
Hillary Clinton (2021-2025)
Michael Bennet (2025-2029)
George P Bush (2029-2037)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Leinad on June 27, 2015, 07:06:46 AM
Hillary Clinton (2021-2025)
Michael Bennet (2025-2029)
George P Bush (2029-2037)

Is that an Obama third-term, a vacant office, or did record of Hillary's first term get lost in her other email account?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Cryptic on June 27, 2015, 11:18:44 AM
45. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) 2017-2025
46. Julian Castro (D-TX) 2025-2029
47. A Republican we haven't heard of yet. (R-?) 2029-2037



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sprouts Farmers Market ✘ on June 27, 2015, 11:30:25 AM
It will be:

Hillary Clinton/Tim Kaine 2017-2021 (over Marco Rubio)
Cory Gardner/Susana Martinez 2021-2029 (over Hillary Clinton, Julian Castro)
Kirsten Gillibrand/Cory Booker 2029-2037 (over Tom Cotton, Unknown Republican)

(though it would be nice to start that off with Rand Paul and switch the next two)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: hurricanehink on June 27, 2015, 05:28:02 PM
Jeb Bush/Brian Sandoval 2017-2021
Kamala Harris/Jack Markell 2021-2029
Justin Amash/Tom Cotton 2029-?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: / on June 27, 2015, 05:53:32 PM
Bernie Sanders (2017-2025)

Sernie Banders (2025-2033)

Sander Bernies (2033-2041)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: TDAS04 on June 27, 2015, 09:05:09 PM
Hillary Clinton (2017-2025)
Jeb Bush (2025-2029)
Chelsea Clinton (2029-2037)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: ElectionsGuy on June 27, 2015, 09:34:01 PM
Jeb Bush/Brian Sandoval 2017-2021
Kamala Harris/Jack Markell 2021-2029
Justin Amash/Tom Cotton 2029-?

This isn't going to happen.

Hillary Clinton (2017-2025)
Jeb Bush (2025-2029)
Chelsea Clinton (2029-2037)

Lord save us.

Bernie Sanders (2017-2025)

Sernie Banders (2025-2033)

Sander Bernies (2033-2041)

Hike Muckabee
Sick Rantorum
Ced Truz
Pand Raul
Beb Jush
Rarco Mubio
Cillary Hlinton
Tonald Drump
Farly Ciorina

LOL!


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sprouts Farmers Market ✘ on June 27, 2015, 09:35:58 PM

Switch that to Raul Pand, and we're golden to lock up the Hispanic vote!


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mr. Smith on June 27, 2015, 11:07:59 PM
Hillary Clinton (2017-2021)
John Kasich (2021- 2025)
Seth Moulton (2025-)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: NHI on June 28, 2015, 11:45:27 AM
45. Hillary Clinton: 2017-2021
46. Brian Sandoval: 2021-2029
47. Seth Moulton: 2029-2037


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kevinstat on June 28, 2015, 12:22:08 PM

Fitting name for him.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Simfan34 on June 28, 2015, 01:45:58 PM
Hillary Clinton (2021-2025)
Michael Bennet (2025-2029)
George P Bush (2029-2037)

Is that an Obama third-term, a vacant office, or did record of Hillary's first term get lost in her other email account?

Haha, it got lost in the tubes.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: mvd10 on July 02, 2015, 10:15:36 AM
Hillary Clinton/Tim Kaine 2017-2021
Bill Haslam/Tom Cotton 2021-2029
Kirsten Gillibrand/some random democrat 2029-2037

Or:

Jeb Bush/John Kasich 2017-2025
Kirsten Gillibrand/some democrat 2025-2029
Tom Cotton/some republican 2029-2033

These are completely random tbh, Im pretty confident Kaine and Kasich atleast are high on Bush's and Clintons veep list because of Virginia and Ohio. Haslam is pretty popular in his state and seems like someone the establishment would like. But Sandoval/Baker/Rauner also could be in Haslam's place. I still hope Romney will be president someday but he is not running in 2016 and he will be 73 in 2020. The only chance on a Romney presidency seems to be a brokered GOP convention with Romney as compromise candidate, but even then he is 69 and I doubt he could win the general election. I think Cotton will eventually end up being a republican and even less popular Obama who eventually will lose reelection.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: ScottieF on July 03, 2015, 12:26:59 AM
Hillary Clinton 2017-2021
Marco Rubio 2021-2029
Kirsten Gillibrand/some Democrat 2029-2037


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: m4567 on July 03, 2015, 10:03:47 AM
Hillary Rodham Clinton: 2017-2021
Marco Rubio: 2021-2029
Unknown democrat: 2029-2037


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: dudeabides on July 03, 2015, 07:56:50 PM
Jeb Bush (R) 2017-2025
Kristen Gillibrand (D) 2025-2033
George P. Bush (R) 2033-2041


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Anti-Bothsidesism on July 03, 2015, 08:49:09 PM
2017-2021 Hillary Clinton (D)
2021-2025 Sherrod Brown (D)
2025-2033 Susanna Martinez (R)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Higgs on July 03, 2015, 10:52:06 PM
45. Hillary Clinton (D) {2017-2021}
46. Marco Rubio (R) {2021-2029}
47. Cory Booker (D) {2029-2037}


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sir Mohamed on July 04, 2015, 06:07:55 AM
2017-2025: Hillary Clinton
2025-2029: Jeff Flake
2029-2037: Cory Booker


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: SWE on July 04, 2015, 06:53:58 PM
Hillary Clinton (2017-2021)
Tom Cotton (2021-2025)
Kamala Harris (2025-2032)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: TarHeelDem on July 24, 2015, 12:25:55 AM
45. Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton (2017-2025)
46. Julian Castro (2025-2033)
47. Marco Antonio Rubio (2033-2041)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mehmentum on July 24, 2015, 11:17:03 AM
Looking through the beginning of the thread, most are very off base.  I noticed one post, though, that was almost eerily prescient.
Barack Obama 2009-2017
Hillary Clinton 2017-2021
Jeb Bush 2021-2025



Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: 100% pro-life no matter what on July 24, 2015, 05:38:49 PM
45. Hillary Clinton (2017 - 2025) (Not sure if she'll win a second term)
46. A Republican (2025 - 2029)
47. A Democrat (Julian Castro?) (2029 - 2037)

No way that there will be a Democratic president for 24 of 28 years


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on July 24, 2015, 08:51:11 PM
45. Hillary Clinton (2017 - 2025) (Not sure if she'll win a second term)
46. A Republican (2025 - 2029)
47. A Democrat (Julian Castro?) (2029 - 2037)



No way that there will be a Democratic president for 24 of 28 years

The GOP party is far from done, but unless they duplicate what Cameron did in UK, after three straight labor party wins, the US will continue to elect dems, with a Hilary win nxt Nov.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kingpoleon on July 29, 2015, 02:39:30 AM
2017-2025: John Kasich(R-OH)/Brian Sandoval(R-NV)
Def.: 2016: Hillary Clinton(D-NY)/Martin Heinrich(D-NM), 2020: Martin Heinrich(D-NM)/Mark Shriver(D-CA)

2025-2029: Joseph P. Kennedy, III(D-MA)/Benjamin Chandler(D-KY)
Def.: 2024: Lindsey Graham(R-SC)/George P. Bush(R-TX)

2029-????: George P. Bush(R-TX)/Georgina Bloomberg(R-NY)

Also, minor parties candidates:
Libertarian Party:
2016: Gary Johnson(L-NM)/Ron Paul(L-TX)
2020: Wayne Allen Root(L-NV)/Rand Paul(L-KY)
2024: Justin Amash(L-MI)/Wayne Allen Root(L-NV)
2028: William Paul(L-ME)/?????

Green Party:
2016: Dennis Kuchinich(G-OH)/Ralph Nader(G-CT)
2020: Gayle McLaughin(G-CA)/Jill Stein(G-MA)
2024: Ben Chipman(G-ME)/David Cobb(D-TX)
2028: Ken Block(G-CT)/Ben Chipman(G-ME)

Constitution Party:
2016: Alan Keyes(C-MD)/Laurie Roth(C-WA)
2020: Tom Tancredo(C-CO)/Jesse Ventura(C-MN)
2024: Tom Hoefling(C-IA)/Douglas Philips(C-VA)
2028: Douglas Philips(C-VA)/Rick Jore(C-MT)

Justice Party:
2016: Rocky Anderson(J-UT)/Gayle McLaughin(J-CA)
2020: Ralph Nader(J-CT)/Rocky Anderson(J-UT)
2024: Rocky Anderson(J-UT)/Richard Caroll(J-AR)
2028: Thomas Arnold(J-IA)/Rocky Anderson(J-UT)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: mencken on August 07, 2015, 11:40:28 AM
2017-2025 Scott Walker
2025-2029 Carly Fiorina
2029-2033 Kamala Harris


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Brewer on August 07, 2015, 10:49:59 PM
Hillary Clinton (2017-2021)
Marco Rubio (2021-2029)
Seth Moulton (2029-2037)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: m4567 on August 08, 2015, 01:53:36 AM
Hillary Rodham Clinton: 2017-2021
John Kasich: 2021-2029
Unknown democrat: 2029-2037


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Leinad on August 08, 2015, 08:37:06 AM

The same William Paul who's done nothing of note so far except a DUI? Also, guys like Rand and probably Amash won't be Libertarian nominees. They're in the Republican party, so I find a switch less than probable, although certainly not impossible. Another thing: Jesse Ventura just endorsed Bernie Sanders, he's not, by any stretch of the imagination, a Constitution Party guy.

This applies to everyone: keep age in mind. I know it's tricky, but make sure the future names are fairly young people. Someone who's about 60 now probably isn't going to be running several years into the future.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Adriano Chiká on August 09, 2015, 11:15:10 AM
Hillary Clinton (2017-2025)
John Kasich (2025-2033)
George P. Bush (2033-2037)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Horsemask on August 09, 2015, 06:42:06 PM
Oh, I'll play along.

Hillary Clinton (2017-2021)
Brian Sandoval (2021-29)
Paul Ryan (2029-2033)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DS0816 on August 11, 2015, 06:12:37 AM
2017-2025 Scott Walker
2025-2029 Carly Fiorina
2029-2033 Kamala Harris

In a realignment period trending against their party, which took effect with Barack Obama's first-term election from 2008,  the Republicans aren't going to string together three consecutive presidential victories.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DS0816 on August 11, 2015, 06:13:23 AM
Hillary Clinton (2017-2025)
John Kasich (2025-2033)
George P. Bush (2033-2037)

Same response from me as I had made to the previous poster's list.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: 100% pro-life no matter what on August 11, 2015, 08:33:10 AM
2017-2025 Scott Walker
2025-2029 Carly Fiorina
2029-2033 Kamala Harris

In a realignment period trending against their party, which took effect with Barack Obama's first-term election from 2008,  the Republicans aren't going to string together three consecutive presidential victories.

Many of us still feel that we are in the Reagan realigning period and that the GOP will continue to be the majority going forward.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DS0816 on August 11, 2015, 08:50:39 AM
2017-2025 Scott Walker
2025-2029 Carly Fiorina
2029-2033 Kamala Harris

In a realignment period trending against their party, which took effect with Barack Obama's first-term election from 2008,  the Republicans aren't going to string together three consecutive presidential victories.

Many of us still feel that we are in the Reagan realigning period and that the GOP will continue to be the majority going forward.

I know.

And that's truly sad.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: tallguy23 on August 11, 2015, 12:30:54 PM
Hillary Clinton
Brian Sandoval
Kristen Gillibrand


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: hopper on August 11, 2015, 01:28:58 PM
45. Hillary Clinton (2017 - 2025) (Not sure if she'll win a second term)
46. A Republican (2025 - 2029)
47. A Democrat (Julian Castro?) (2029 - 2037)



No way that there will be a Democratic president for 24 of 28 years

The GOP party is far from done, but unless they duplicate what Cameron did in UK, after three straight labor party wins, the US will continue to elect dems, with a Hilary win nxt Nov.
I think the GOP is 8-12 years away doing what Cameron did in the UK. They are still a Deep South Party in the idealogical sense. I do think the Republicans can still make it interesting next year though. I really think Hillary has some flaws as a candidate that the GOP can really exploit. However, with Trump sucking up all the oxygen in the media right now....


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DS0816 on August 11, 2015, 03:02:43 PM
45. Hillary Clinton (2017 - 2025) (Not sure if she'll win a second term)
46. A Republican (2025 - 2029)
47. A Democrat (Julian Castro?) (2029 - 2037)



No way that there will be a Democratic president for 24 of 28 years

The GOP party is far from done, but unless they duplicate what Cameron did in UK, after three straight labor party wins, the US will continue to elect dems, with a Hilary win nxt Nov.
I think the GOP is 8-12 years away doing what Cameron did in the UK. They are still a Deep South Party in the idealogical sense. I do think the Republicans can still make it interesting next year though. I really think Hillary has some flaws as a candidate that the GOP can really exploit. However, with Trump sucking up all the oxygen in the media right now....

The Deep South is the base for the Republican Party.

Take a look at old electoral maps, dating back to the second half of the 19th century. States voting diametrically opposite each other are the Deep South neighbors Alabama and Mississippi, on one side, and the northeastern Vermont, on the other political side.

Ulysses Grant carried all three states with his re-election in 1872. The three didn't carry the same again until 100 years later for the 49-state re-election of Richard Nixon in 1972. Both Grant and Nixon won their re-elections having carried more than 80 percent of available states. And in between—that would be the presidential elections of 1876 to 1968—resulted in Alabama/Mississippi on one side and Vermont on the other political side as they would not all carry the same, not even once, with any of the 24 election cycles which saw Woodrow Wilson (1912), Herbert Hoover (1928), Franklin Roosevelt (his first two wins from 1932 and 1936), Dwight Eisenhower (1952 and 1956), and Lyndon Johnson (1964) also carry 80 percent or more of available states with their landslide victories.

Nixon was right: the [Deep] South is the [future; and, of course, present] Republican Party.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: mencken on August 11, 2015, 05:44:00 PM
2017-2025 Scott Walker
2025-2029 Carly Fiorina
2029-2033 Kamala Harris

In a realignment period trending against their party, which took effect with Barack Obama's first-term election from 2008,  the Republicans aren't going to string together three consecutive presidential victories.

I disagree with the premise.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DS0816 on August 11, 2015, 08:03:42 PM
2017-2025 Scott Walker
2025-2029 Carly Fiorina
2029-2033 Kamala Harris

In a realignment period trending against their party, which took effect with Barack Obama's first-term election from 2008,  the Republicans aren't going to string together three consecutive presidential victories.

I disagree with the premise.

You're allowed to feel that you "disagree." But, go back to the previous realignments of 1800–1824 (Democratic–Republican), 1828–1856 (Democratic), 1860–1892 (Republican), 1896–1928 (Republican), 1932–1964 (Democratic), and 1968–2004 (Republican) and cite an example of the out party having won three consecutive election cycles.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: mencken on August 11, 2015, 08:08:30 PM
2017-2025 Scott Walker
2025-2029 Carly Fiorina
2029-2033 Kamala Harris

In a realignment period trending against their party, which took effect with Barack Obama's first-term election from 2008,  the Republicans aren't going to string together three consecutive presidential victories.

I disagree with the premise.

You're allowed to feel that you "disagree." But, go back to the previous realignments of 1800–1824 (Democratic–Republican), 1828–1856 (Democratic), 1860–1892 (Republican), 1896–1928 (Republican), 1932–1964 (Democratic), and 1968–2004 (Republican) and cite an example of the out party having won three consecutive election cycles.

Texas sharpshooter fallacy. Of course if you go back retroactively, periods in which the roulette wheel chooses the red several times in a row are not going to have three blacks in a row. That has no statistical bearing on the future though. Unless you can provide some inherent reason why there should be merit to such 40 (36? 28?) year cyclic behavior, I shall continue to regard it as as valid as astrology.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Rockefeller GOP on August 11, 2015, 08:32:39 PM
2017-2025 Scott Walker
2025-2029 Carly Fiorina
2029-2033 Kamala Harris

In a realignment period trending against their party, which took effect with Barack Obama's first-term election from 2008,  the Republicans aren't going to string together three consecutive presidential victories.

I disagree with the premise.

You're allowed to feel that you "disagree." But, go back to the previous realignments of 1800–1824 (Democratic–Republican), 1828–1856 (Democratic), 1860–1892 (Republican), 1896–1928 (Republican), 1932–1964 (Democratic), and 1968–2004 (Republican) and cite an example of the out party having won three consecutive election cycles.

Texas sharpshooter fallacy. Of course if you go back retroactively, periods in which the roulette wheel chooses the red several times in a row are not going to have three blacks in a row. That has no statistical bearing on the future though. Unless you can provide some inherent reason why there should be merit to such 40 (36? 28?) year cyclic behavior, I shall continue to regard it as as valid as astrology.

Exactly ... If he were a poster on here in the '50s, he'd be going on about how a bunch of stuff is "impossible," and it would have all happened (for the first time ever, OMG!!) by now.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DS0816 on August 12, 2015, 07:54:29 PM
2017-2025 Scott Walker
2025-2029 Carly Fiorina
2029-2033 Kamala Harris

In a realignment period trending against their party, which took effect with Barack Obama's first-term election from 2008,  the Republicans aren't going to string together three consecutive presidential victories.

I disagree with the premise.

You're allowed to feel that you "disagree." But, go back to the previous realignments of 1800–1824 (Democratic–Republican), 1828–1856 (Democratic), 1860–1892 (Republican), 1896–1928 (Republican), 1932–1964 (Democratic), and 1968–2004 (Republican) and cite an example of the out party having won three consecutive election cycles.

Texas sharpshooter fallacy. Of course if you go back retroactively, periods in which the roulette wheel chooses the red several times in a row are not going to have three blacks in a row. That has no statistical bearing on the future though. Unless you can provide some inherent reason why there should be merit to such 40 (36? 28?) year cyclic behavior, I shall continue to regard it as as valid as astrology.

Realignments are not “fallacies.”

I will let you do your own research—assuming you’re capable—which should be a help to you.




Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Yelnoc on August 12, 2015, 08:02:02 PM
2017-2025 Scott Walker
2025-2029 Carly Fiorina
2029-2033 Kamala Harris

In a realignment period trending against their party, which took effect with Barack Obama's first-term election from 2008,  the Republicans aren't going to string together three consecutive presidential victories.

I disagree with the premise.

You're allowed to feel that you "disagree." But, go back to the previous realignments of 1800–1824 (Democratic–Republican), 1828–1856 (Democratic), 1860–1892 (Republican), 1896–1928 (Republican), 1932–1964 (Democratic), and 1968–2004 (Republican) and cite an example of the out party having won three consecutive election cycles.

Texas sharpshooter fallacy. Of course if you go back retroactively, periods in which the roulette wheel chooses the red several times in a row are not going to have three blacks in a row. That has no statistical bearing on the future though. Unless you can provide some inherent reason why there should be merit to such 40 (36? 28?) year cyclic behavior, I shall continue to regard it as as valid as astrology.

Realignments are not “fallacies.”

I will let you do your own research—assuming you’re capable—which should be a help to you.




Damn dude, calm the f[inks] down, no need to be so rude.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: NHI on August 12, 2015, 10:00:33 PM
45. Hillary Clinton: 2017-2021
46. Marco Rubio: 2021-2029
47. Kelly Ayotte: 2029-


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: mencken on August 12, 2015, 10:07:50 PM
2017-2025 Scott Walker
2025-2029 Carly Fiorina
2029-2033 Kamala Harris

In a realignment period trending against their party, which took effect with Barack Obama's first-term election from 2008,  the Republicans aren't going to string together three consecutive presidential victories.

I disagree with the premise.

You're allowed to feel that you "disagree." But, go back to the previous realignments of 1800–1824 (Democratic–Republican), 1828–1856 (Democratic), 1860–1892 (Republican), 1896–1928 (Republican), 1932–1964 (Democratic), and 1968–2004 (Republican) and cite an example of the out party having won three consecutive election cycles.

Texas sharpshooter fallacy. Of course if you go back retroactively, periods in which the roulette wheel chooses the red several times in a row are not going to have three blacks in a row. That has no statistical bearing on the future though. Unless you can provide some inherent reason why there should be merit to such 40 (36? 28?) year cyclic behavior, I shall continue to regard it as as valid as astrology.

Realignments are not “fallacies.”

I will let you do your own research—assuming you’re capable—which should be a help to you.

What is even more amusing is that your entire theory contradicts itself. 537 more votes for Al Gore in Florida would provide a counterexample where Democrats won three consecutive elections in a Republican "realignment." Are we supposed to believe that such an insignificant difference is attributable to historicist hogwash? Similarly, are we to attribute Nixon's whisker loss in 1960 not to a poor debate performance or high turnout at the cemeteries, but to destiny?

Additionally, as I pointed out earlier, your alignment periods are of inconsistent length. The first is 28 years, the second is 32 years, then three of 36 years, followed by 40 years. Your realignment intervals should at least be consistent if you want a testable theory. Otherwise, couldn't one just as easily define the realignment periods as being 1968-1988 (Republican) and 1992-2012 (Democratic)? Both of those 24 year periods would be only 4 years short of your shortest realignment.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DS0816 on August 12, 2015, 11:13:54 PM
2017-2025 Scott Walker
2025-2029 Carly Fiorina
2029-2033 Kamala Harris

In a realignment period trending against their party, which took effect with Barack Obama's first-term election from 2008,  the Republicans aren't going to string together three consecutive presidential victories.

I disagree with the premise.

You're allowed to feel that you "disagree." But, go back to the previous realignments of 1800–1824 (Democratic–Republican), 1828–1856 (Democratic), 1860–1892 (Republican), 1896–1928 (Republican), 1932–1964 (Democratic), and 1968–2004 (Republican) and cite an example of the out party having won three consecutive election cycles.

Texas sharpshooter fallacy. Of course if you go back retroactively, periods in which the roulette wheel chooses the red several times in a row are not going to have three blacks in a row. That has no statistical bearing on the future though. Unless you can provide some inherent reason why there should be merit to such 40 (36? 28?) year cyclic behavior, I shall continue to regard it as as valid as astrology.

Realignments are not “fallacies.”

I will let you do your own research—assuming you’re capable—which should be a help to you.

What is even more amusing is that your entire theory contradicts itself. 537 more votes for Al Gore in Florida would provide a counterexample where Democrats won three consecutive elections in a Republican "realignment." Are we supposed to believe that such an insignificant difference is attributable to historicist hogwash? Similarly, are we to attribute Nixon's whisker loss in 1960 not to a poor debate performance or high turnout at the cemeteries, but to destiny?

Additionally, as I pointed out earlier, your alignment periods are of inconsistent length. The first is 28 years, the second is 32 years, then three of 36 years, followed by 40 years. Your realignment intervals should at least be consistent if you want a testable theory. Otherwise, couldn't one just as easily define the realignment periods as being 1968-1988 (Republican) and 1992-2012 (Democratic)? Both of those 24 year periods would be only 4 years short of your shortest realignment.

Are you telling us that John Kennedy wasn't the 35th president of the United States?

Are you telling us that George W. Bush wasn't the 43rd president of the United States?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: madelka on August 14, 2015, 03:07:36 AM
2017-2021: Hillary Clinton
2021-2029: Marco Rubio or another Republican (major Republican realignment)
2029-2037: Susana Martinez


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Snowman on August 17, 2015, 09:53:20 AM
2016
H. Clinton beats J. Bush/
2017-2021 Hillary Clinton

2020
Walker beats VP Julian Castro
2021-2025 Scott Walker

2024
JPKIII beats President Walker
2025-2033 Joseph P. Kennedy


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mister Mets on August 20, 2015, 10:53:44 PM
2017-2025: Jeb Bush
2025-2033: A Democrat who hasn't been elected to major office yet. Probably a woman.
2033-2041: George P Bush


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: 100% pro-life no matter what on August 21, 2015, 08:58:02 PM
2017-2025: Jeb Bush
2025-2033: A Democrat who hasn't been elected to major office yet. Probably a woman.
2033-2041: George P Bush

So, it's 2041 and it has been over half a century since there was a GOP President not named Bush and a whopping 64 years since there was no Bush on the ticket (112 without a GOP win without a Bush or Nixon).  Any more Bushes to be candidates by then?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sprouts Farmers Market ✘ on August 21, 2015, 09:11:46 PM
2017-2033 Donald J. Trump
2033-2053 Ivanka Trump
2043-20?? A Trump to be named Later


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mr. Illini on August 22, 2015, 10:40:43 AM
Hillary Clinton 2016-2024
John Kasich 2024-2032
Joe Kennedy III 2032-2040


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Lincoln Republican on August 22, 2015, 11:42:18 AM
Marco Rubio          2017-2025
Michael Bennett     2025-2033
Tom Cotton           2033-2041


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kingpoleon on August 22, 2015, 07:24:31 PM
The same William Paul who's done nothing of note so far except a DUI? Also, guys like Rand and probably Amash won't be Libertarian nominees. They're in the Republican party, so I find a switch less than probable, although certainly not impossible. Another thing: Jesse Ventura just endorsed Bernie Sanders, he's not, by any stretch of the imagination, a Constitution Party guy.

This applies to everyone: keep age in mind. I know it's tricky, but make sure the future names are fairly young people. Someone who's about 60 now probably isn't going to be running several years into the future.
Rand Paul is more libertarian than Bob Barr. Furthermore, Amash is most definitely libertarian. Even on gay marriage, "big government is the threat to traditional marriage." I can see Amash primaried out in 2018 by the establishment and running Libertarian for revenge.

As for Ventura, he's Ventura. Endorsing Sanders and Trump? Lunatic? 2000 Reform Party? The 2000 Reform Party, previously centrist, chose between the extreme Nader and Buchanan.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: TarHeelDem on August 23, 2015, 09:39:08 PM
Hillary Clinton 2016-2024
John Kasich 2024-2032
Joe Kennedy III 2032-2040

Something like this, probably.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: bagelman on September 05, 2015, 01:03:05 PM
John Kasich 2017-2025

Susanna Martinez 2025-2029

Currently a environmental activist from California (2029-2037)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: m4567 on October 28, 2015, 04:19:47 PM
Hillary Rodham Clinton: 2017-2021

John Kasich or Marco Rubio: 2021-2029

Unknown democrat: 2029-2037


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Clark Kent on October 28, 2015, 04:30:03 PM
2017-2021: Hillary Clinton (Democratic, New York)
2021-2029: Marco Rubio (Republican, Florida)
2029-         : Paul Ryan (Republican, Wisconsin)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Clark Kent on October 28, 2015, 08:06:10 PM
Hillary Clinton 2016-2024
John Kasich 2024-2032
Joe Kennedy III 2032-2040

Something like this, probably.

We've already broken the record for most two-termers in a row.  Three more would be truly extraordinary.
Correction: We've tied the record. Clinton/Bush/Obama is tied with Jefferson/Madison/Monroe.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: / on October 28, 2015, 11:02:41 PM
Donal J Trump 2017-2025
Donal J Trump Jr 2025-2033
Ivanka J Trump 2033-2041


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Penelope on October 29, 2015, 09:54:19 AM
Barring assassinations, deaths in office, etc, I think it's got to look something like this:

45. Hillary Rodham Clinton, 2017 - 2025
46. Marco A. Rubio, 2025 - 2033
47. Some Democrat, 2033 - 2037?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Figueira on October 29, 2015, 04:24:14 PM
Hillary Clinton 2016-2024
John Kasich 2024-2032
Joe Kennedy III 2032-2040

Something like this, probably.

We've already broken the record for most two-termers in a row.  Three more would be truly extraordinary.

Who knows? Maybe our political system has evolved to the point where two-term presidents are the norm.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Figueira on October 29, 2015, 05:53:09 PM
Hillary Clinton 2016-2024
John Kasich 2024-2032
Joe Kennedy III 2032-2040

Something like this, probably.

We've already broken the record for most two-termers in a row.  Three more would be truly extraordinary.

Who knows? Maybe our political system has evolved to the point where two-term presidents are the norm.

Can you explain why incumbency advantages would be growing with time?

I have no idea, honestly. I'm just saying that it's a possibility.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: I support Sanders on October 29, 2015, 11:24:45 PM
1.) Sanders/Chafee (2017-2027; 22nd amendment repealed in 2024, and Sanders dies in office.

2.) Lincoln Chafee (2027-2033) continues Sanders' progressive agenda for a term-and-a-half, retiring gracefully at age 79 and passing the mantle of the Democratic Party onto a new generation of progressives, who were just kids when George W. Bush was in office. The GOP disbanded in 2021, and its base split to populate the ranks of the Libertarian Party (Rand Paul and the libertarians) and Constitution Party (Ted Cruz and the social conservatives).

3*Unnamed fresh progressive Democratic face (2033-?)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Del Tachi on October 30, 2015, 02:00:49 PM
45.  Marco Rubio (R-FL) / John Kasich (R-OH); 2017-2021
46.  Andrew Cuomo (D-NY) / Kamala Harris (D-CA); 2021-2029
47.  George P. Bush (R-TX) / Adam Putnam (R-FL); 2029 - 2033
48.  Seth Moulton (D-MA) / Kari Dzidec (D-MN); 2033 - 2041


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Figueira on October 30, 2015, 02:07:08 PM
45. Hillary Clinton 2017-2025
46. Rick Snyder 2025-2029
47. Martin Heinrich 2029-2033


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Frodo on November 01, 2015, 01:00:30 PM
Hillary R. Clinton (she serves two full terms)
George P. Bush (if he becomes Texas governor in 2018)
Kamala Harris


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on November 02, 2015, 09:20:01 AM
Clinton (2017-2025)
George P Bush (2025-2029)
Joe Kennedy III (2029-2033)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Coolface Sock #42069 on November 08, 2015, 10:06:58 PM
Clinton 2017-2021
Republican, Rubio or someone to his right 2021-2029
Someone who has very little political experience 2029-?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kingpoleon on November 09, 2015, 10:15:22 PM
Joe Biden
Mario Cuomo
Marco Rubio

Gotta love the poetry of the latter two
10/10.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Drew on December 05, 2015, 10:33:24 PM
Hillary Clinton (D) 2017-2021
Paul Ryan (R) 2021-2029
Cory Booker (D) 2029-2037


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kingpoleon on December 05, 2015, 11:04:12 PM
These threads are absolutely inane and retarded. Ask this in 1992. How many would say the Governor of Arkansas, the current President's son, and either a Chicago community organizer or Senator just involved in the Keating Five? There's a ton of other similar scenarios.

Of course the sheer stupidity of them and the idea that in the 2020s we'll still be dealing with the same people we have today is probably why they appeal so much to people like Naso, DWTL and constine.

1. Gov. Bill Clinton(D-AR)
2. Gov. George W. Bush(R-TX)
3. Sen. Hillary Clinton(D-AR)

They might miss a state, but it's not that far-fetched.

For example, 2008:
2009-2017: Sen. Barack Obama(D-IL)
2017-2021: Fmr. Gov. Jeb Bush(R-FL)
2021-2025: Gov. Martin O'Malley(D-MD)

Right now, for instance:
2017-2021: Sen. Marco Rubio(R-FL)
2021-2029: Gov. Gavin Newsom(D-CA)
2029-2037: Sen. Elise Stefanik(R-NY)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: WVdemocrat on January 27, 2016, 05:25:00 PM
45. Hillary Clinton (2017-2021)
46. Paul Ryan (2021-2029)
47. Joe Kennedy (2029-)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Seneca on January 27, 2016, 05:40:01 PM
45. Donald Trump (2017-2021)
46. Bill de Blasio (2021-2025) [Or some other socialist-lite politician]
47. [Retired Airforce Colonel So-and-So] (2025-45)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: This account no longer in use. on January 27, 2016, 05:50:40 PM
Reading the early pages of this topic is quite hilarious.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mike Thick on January 27, 2016, 05:54:45 PM
Reading the early pages of this topic is quite hilarious.

If you thought this was good, go to the earliest page of the 2016 board.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Asian Nazi on January 27, 2016, 05:57:54 PM
Reading the early pages of this topic is quite hilarious.

It must be weird reading posts from before you were born


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Former Senator Haslam2020 on January 27, 2016, 06:26:00 PM
45. Hillary Clinton (2017-2021)
46. Tom Cotton (2021-2025)
47. some democrat


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: 100% pro-life no matter what on January 27, 2016, 08:15:10 PM
Gov. Scott Walker/Gov. Susana Martinez (2017-2025)
VP Susana Martinez/Gov. Marco Rubio (2025-2029)
Gov. Andrew Cuomo/A young (Socialist) Dem Senator (2029-2037)
Gov. George P. Bush/Sen. Tom Cotton (2037-2045)
Sen. Matt Walker/ Some random GOPer we don't know yet (2045-2053)

Elections:
2016: Scott Walker over Hillary Clinton
2020: Scott Walker over Elizabeth Warren
2024: Susana Martinez over Alan Grayson
2028: Andrew Cuomo over Marco Rubio (Pres. Martinez decides not to run)
2032: Andrew Cuomo over Rand Paul
All subsequent losers are as of yet unknown (and remember that I have a ton of names of young Republicans who could rise, but almost no Democrats).

It's time to go back and laugh at myself:

2017-2025: Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL)/Gov. Nikki Haley (R-SC)
2025-2029: Sen. Andrew Cuomo (D-NY)/Rep. Julian Castro (D-TX)
2029-2033: VP Julian Castro (D-TX)/Someone yet unknown in her early 40s (D-WA)
2033-: Speaker Elise Stefanik (R-NY)/Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC)


Losing candidates:
2016- Hillary Clinton
2020- Andrew Cuomo
2024- Nikki Haley
2028- Scott Walker (Pres. Cuomo did not seek re-election)
2032- Julian Castro (incumbent defeated for first time in 40 years)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kingpoleon on January 27, 2016, 09:56:48 PM
2017-2025: Gov. John Kasich(R-OH)/Sen. Cory Gardner(R-CO)
2025-2029: Gov. Gavin Newsom(D-CA)/Sen. Cory Booker(D-NJ)
2029-2037: Sen. Elise Stefanik(R-NY)/Sen. Jake Coleman(R-MN)


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: tallguy23 on February 01, 2016, 03:14:00 AM
Not sure on how many terms, but I'd guess something like this.

Clinton
Rubio
Heinrich


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Sir Mohamed on February 01, 2016, 03:19:52 AM
2017-2025: Hillary Clinton
2025-2029: Jeff Flake
2029-: Gavin Newsom


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: OSR stands with Israel on February 01, 2016, 04:10:03 AM
2017-2021: Hillary Clinton
2021- 2029: Nikki Haley
2029-2037: John Bell Edwards


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Nym90 on February 01, 2016, 12:43:00 PM
To appreciate the futility of this exercise, consider how many people if asked this question on January 20th, 1989 would have included Barack Obama.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: OSR stands with Israel on February 02, 2016, 03:12:43 AM
To appreciate the futility of this exercise, consider how many people if asked this question on January 20th, 1989 would have included Barack Obama.

I would have guessed

1996-2000: Robert Dole
2000-2008: Al Gore
2008-2016: Newt Gingrich


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Kingpoleon on February 02, 2016, 05:07:44 PM
To appreciate the futility of this, how many people would have guessed Ford, Carter, Reagan in 1973? Oh wait...


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Bob Dole '96 on February 03, 2016, 03:15:33 AM
Wild stab:

Marco Rubio (2017-2025) - Defeats Hillary with 330+ EV; Cuomo in re-election with 300EV
Cory Booker (2025-2029) -- Defeats Mike Lee in narrow election
Joni Ernst (2033) -- Defeats Booker in narrow election




Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mr. Morden on November 10, 2016, 01:22:28 PM
*bump*

So, who had Obama and Trump as the next two when this thread started?


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mr. Morden on December 05, 2020, 04:50:17 PM

Reaganfan started this thread in 2008, and (barring something crazy happening, like either Trump or Biden dropping dead before Jan. 20th) we now know the answer to the question he posed: Obama, Trump, Biden.  Not that anyone would have guessed that particular sequence back then.

Also, funny in retrospect is this suggestion that Biden would never be able to win the Dem. nomination for president even if he'd already ascended to the presidency and was running as an incumbent:

I would consider voting for Mark Warner against say, a populist social-conservative, but I'm not 100% sure where Warner stands economically.  I'm sure that will be fleshed out in his coming Senate term.

He's moderately pro-business, and is basically a Blue Dog Democrat on economics.

So he's a Republican, more or less.

No; he can govern well.

Well played.

Anyway, just for fun:

1. Barack Obama (2009-2011)
2. Joe Biden (2011-2013)
3. Mark Warner (2013-??)

I'm not implying an Obama assassination to stir up the pot, or based on any animosity I hold towards him, I'm just making my best guess based on the historical drama. Now, poke holes in it.

If Biden becomes President, he runs for reelection.

I don't think he could win his party's nomination, even as a sitting President. True, Warner doesn't seem the type to challenge him, but I couldn't think of anyone better.

Oh, and how about this prediction that Obama would drop Biden from the ticket in 2012:

I don't think Obama's going to pick Biden again.  He won't need him.  And he'll (along with the rest of his party) want to pick someone seen as a lock to win the office when he leaves.  So, if Obama's got high exit numbers, #45 will be whoever his next VP is. 


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: S019 on December 06, 2020, 12:46:41 AM
Joe Biden
Kamala Harris
Either Kamala's VP or a Republican


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: EastwoodS on December 06, 2020, 03:11:57 AM
Joe Biden dies in office, And Kamala Harris finishes his term and loses to a Republican in 2024. Yah, that makes the most sense, good take.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: DabbingSanta on December 06, 2020, 10:15:03 AM
Joe Biden
Kamala Harris
Kanye West

Please quote me in 4-8 years when this happens lol.



Well, he's not wrong, ya know? I don't think anyone in 2008 got it right.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: dw93 on December 06, 2020, 03:35:08 PM
To appreciate the futility of this, how many people would have guessed Ford, Carter, Reagan in 1973? Oh wait...

If I had to guess in January of 1973:

38. Nelson Rockefeller (Republican): 1977-1981
Def. 1976: Sen. Scoop Jackson (Democratic)
39. Ted Kennedy (Democratic): 1981-1989
Def. 1980:VP Bob Dole (Republican)*
Def. 1984: Sen. Howard Baker (Republican)

40. Southern or Western Republican: 1989-1997
Def. 1988: Kennedy's VP

*=President Rockefeller declines to seek a 2nd term due to Health issues.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Mr. Morden on December 06, 2020, 04:42:20 PM


Well, he's not wrong, ya know? I don't think anyone in 2008 got it right.

No one would have predicted Trump as a future president in 2008, that's true.  However, a few people in 2008 in this thread predicted Biden as a future president, but had him following immediately after Obama, and often because of presumed assassination of Obama or something, as they didn't think he could win an election on his own (lol).

There is often a response to threads like these along the lines of "What is the point of these threads?  You can't predict who's going to be president in 10 years."  But I'd say that, at any point in time, you can certainly pick out some current politicians who are more likely to be president at some point in the future than others, even if you can't predict what year they'll become president.  So maybe the thread should instead be something like "Name the people most likely to become president some day, regardless of timing."


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: ChiefFireWaterMike on December 06, 2020, 11:43:09 PM
Bobby Jindal (2013-2017)
Joe Biden (2017-2021)
Bobby Jindal (2021-2025)

Uh...I guess this is playing into the Indian joke. Anyway, Biden isn't going to be nominated at the age of 74 to run for President, Naso.
So much for that,  although it's crazy that no one really thought Biden was viable, let alone arguably Democrats best choice


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: EastwoodS on December 06, 2020, 11:55:51 PM
Joe Biden
Kamala Harris
Kanye West

Please quote me in 4-8 years when this happens lol.


Would Kanye run as a Republican?
Well, he's not wrong, ya know? I don't think anyone in 2008 got it right.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: H. Ross Peron on December 07, 2020, 05:52:43 PM
Barack Obama 2009 - 2017
Boris Johnson 2017 - 2021
Al Franken 2021 - 2021

Hahaha


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: H. Ross Peron on December 07, 2020, 05:55:28 PM
Al Franken? I could beat him. Give us Al Franken, the former writer for Playboy. Do it! Nominate Al Franken. LMAO his running mate could be Larry Flint or better yet better yet George Soros. I can see the ads now showing potential playboy parties at OUR WHITE HOUSE. Let the GOP run against him. PLEASE!!!

One of the most quaint posts in hindsight.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: TransfemmeGoreVidal on December 07, 2020, 07:35:28 PM
Al Franken? I could beat him. Give us Al Franken, the former writer for Playboy. Do it! Nominate Al Franken. LMAO his running mate could be Larry Flint or better yet better yet George Soros. I can see the ads now showing potential playboy parties at OUR WHITE HOUSE. Let the GOP run against him. PLEASE!!!

One of the most quaint posts in hindsight.

lol for real, I can't believe looking back that I used to joke about the possibility of Franken as a liberal Reagan.


Title: Re: Name the next three U.S. Presidents
Post by: Grumpier Than Thou on December 08, 2020, 11:09:56 AM
Rand Paul 2017-2025
Amy Klobuchar 2025-2033
Aaron Schock 2033-2041

YIKES