Talk Elections

Atlas Fantasy Elections => Atlas Fantasy Elections => Topic started by: DownWithTheLeft on August 07, 2008, 10:04:04 AM



Title: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 07, 2008, 10:04:04 AM
Ok, so we have the same acronym as the Sam Spade Party :P

We share almost the same views as the United Antifederalist League, but we set up shop solely in the Southeast.  Here are our goals:

1.) Electing officials who support rights of region
2.) Electing officials who support the Independence of the Dirty South


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 07, 2008, 10:10:46 AM
Also note we will only be running candidates in the Southeast


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on August 07, 2008, 10:13:43 AM
I will join.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on August 07, 2008, 10:17:37 AM
Membership: 2
Trolls-and-or-Frauds: 2

lol

joke party


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 07, 2008, 10:19:41 AM
Membership: 2
Trolls-and-or-Frauds: 2

lol

joke party
Don't you have some Holocaust pictures to enjoy?


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on August 07, 2008, 10:24:53 AM
Membership: 2
Trolls-and-or-Frauds: 2

lol

joke party
Don't you have some Holocaust pictures to enjoy?

Watch it, 10-year-old.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 07, 2008, 10:26:57 AM
Your like watching a bad Monty Phyton, and I don't like a good Monty Phyton

Also seriously are you complaining about my responses?  Your the one who butted your nose into something and called two people trolls and frauds


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on August 07, 2008, 10:31:50 AM
I wouldn't worry about him. Anyone who has to cheapen themselves to name calling really has no legit argument. Run along, realpolitik, you're not needed here.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on August 07, 2008, 10:32:58 AM
Your like watching a bad Monty Phyton, and I don't like a good Monty Phyton

I've no idea what a "Monty Phyton" is. Some form of alcoholic drink, perhaps. Phyton... fy-tonne... futon... ah. Some form of bed then.

Quote
Your the one who butted your nose into something and called two people trolls and frauds

Oh, but you are trolls and frauds :)


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on August 07, 2008, 10:34:22 AM
I wouldn't worry about him. Anyone who has to cheapen themselves to name calling really has no legit argument. Run along, realpolitik, you're not needed here.

Pointing out the probable truth is not actually name-calling. Fraud.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Colin on August 07, 2008, 10:44:02 AM
We already had the Southeast attempt to seceed once in Atlasia and it was crushed with full impunity, I intend to help with that again if the time comes.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 07, 2008, 11:48:40 AM
I was about to suggest you join the NCP, but this works, too.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 07, 2008, 03:39:54 PM
We already had the Southeast attempt to seceed once in Atlasia and it was crushed with full impunity, I intend to help with that again if the time comes.

     You have my full support. LET'S TAKE . . . THESE . . . REBS . . . DOWN! Who's with me?


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Hash on August 07, 2008, 03:41:32 PM

You need to re-register, then.

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=34355.1950


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: The Mikado on August 07, 2008, 03:41:43 PM
Ok, so we have the same acronym as the Sam Spade Party :P

We share almost the same views as the United Antifederalist League, but we set up shop solely in the Southeast.  Here are our goals:

1.) Electing officials who support rights of region
2.) Electing officials who support the Independence of the Dirty South


So, you've left the Atlasian Unity Block for a secessionist party?


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Sam Spade on August 07, 2008, 03:46:10 PM
(yawn)  StatesRights and Jake were much better at this.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: SPC on August 07, 2008, 05:02:41 PM
Membership: 2
Trolls-and-or-Frauds: 2

lol

joke party

"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win"
-Mahatma Gandhi


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 07, 2008, 05:06:57 PM
What do you win? This is a damn computer simulation. We can just set up a loyal Southeastern government.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: SPC on August 07, 2008, 05:13:47 PM
What do you win? This is a damn computer simulation. We can just set up a loyal Southeastern government.

And what constitutional authority would the Atlasian government have to do that? Unless unionists currently in the Southeast join Columbia and Columbia subsequently ratifies the Atlasian constitution. In that case, we will have succeeed in ridding those willing to stay in the Dirty South of Atlasian intervention. We will be able to make our own laws just like the Atlasian government makes their laws.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 07, 2008, 05:15:40 PM
What do you win? This is a damn computer simulation. We can just set up a loyal Southeastern government.

And what constitutional authority would the Atlasian government have to do that? Unless unionists currently in the Southeast join Columbia and Columbia subsequently ratifies the Atlasian constitution. In that case, we will have succeeed in ridding those willing to stay in the Dirty South of Atlasian intervention. We will be able to make our own laws just like the Atlasian government makes their laws.

Since secession is illegal, the Southeastern government becomes illegal the moment it approves secession. Power then passes normally to John Dibble.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: SPC on August 07, 2008, 05:19:16 PM
What do you win? This is a damn computer simulation. We can just set up a loyal Southeastern government.

And what constitutional authority would the Atlasian government have to do that? Unless unionists currently in the Southeast join Columbia and Columbia subsequently ratifies the Atlasian constitution. In that case, we will have succeeed in ridding those willing to stay in the Dirty South of Atlasian intervention. We will be able to make our own laws just like the Atlasian government makes their laws.

Since secession is illegal, the Southeastern government becomes illegal the moment it approves secession. Power then passes normally to John Dibble.

This is a matter of logic:
If The Atlasian Constitution does not mention secession
and The Atlasian Constitution on two occasions grants all powers not given to the federal government to the regions and the people
then Secession is a right given to the regions and the people


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 07, 2008, 05:38:01 PM
What do you win? This is a damn computer simulation. We can just set up a loyal Southeastern government.

And what constitutional authority would the Atlasian government have to do that? Unless unionists currently in the Southeast join Columbia and Columbia subsequently ratifies the Atlasian constitution. In that case, we will have succeeed in ridding those willing to stay in the Dirty South of Atlasian intervention. We will be able to make our own laws just like the Atlasian government makes their laws.

Since secession is illegal, the Southeastern government becomes illegal the moment it approves secession. Power then passes normally to John Dibble.
I think you really missed the ball where Section 2 is merely to try for appeasement, we honestly don't care if we are part of Atlasia at all.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: ilikeverin on August 08, 2008, 11:24:56 AM
The UAC disavows all ties with the new secessionist party and would like to remind said party that the UAC favors legal, multilateral dissolution of the federal government, not unilateral secession.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 08, 2008, 11:27:19 AM
The UAC disavows all ties with the new secessionist party and would like to remind said party that the UAC favors legal, multilateral dissolution of the federal government, not unilateral secession.
I hope that means a vote against the end of regional senators from your region


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: SPC on August 08, 2008, 07:22:44 PM
The UAC disavows all ties with the new secessionist party and would like to remind said party that the UAC favors legal, multilateral dissolution of the federal government, not unilateral secession.

There is nothing in the Atlasian Constitution prohibition secession, and all powers not given to the Atlasian government are given to the people. Thus, the secession is legal.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 08, 2008, 07:24:22 PM
The UAC disavows all ties with the new secessionist party and would like to remind said party that the UAC favors legal, multilateral dissolution of the federal government, not unilateral secession.

There is nothing in the Atlasian Constitution prohibition secession, and all powers not given to the Atlasian government are given to the people. Thus, the secession is legal.

Stop being a damn broken record. Colin's sufficiently debunked your argument.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: SPC on August 08, 2008, 07:29:15 PM
The UAC disavows all ties with the new secessionist party and would like to remind said party that the UAC favors legal, multilateral dissolution of the federal government, not unilateral secession.

There is nothing in the Atlasian Constitution prohibition secession, and all powers not given to the Atlasian government are given to the people. Thus, the secession is legal.

Stop being a damn broken record. Colin's sufficiently debunked your argument.

Please show me this argument.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 08, 2008, 07:32:23 PM
At your service:

OFFICIAL STATEMENT
7 Aug 2008, The White House

The President continues to monitor the situation in the Southeast and its impending secession vote.  It has been and remains the position of the White House that it is of the highest priority that our union be preserved.

Even if the union is not consentual? Any contract that prohibits one party from exiting that contract is a slave contract. Do you wish to be the president of slaves?

The union was never consentual. The regions were created out of thin air after the creation of the federal government, by the federal government, and enshrined in the first constitution. This is not the United States, the regions did not come together to form a nation, the federal structure formed first and then bequethed the regions as defined sub-national entities. There was no consentual compact since they were created by fiat of the Federal Government and the first Constitutional Convention and did not exist prior to the existance of this Federal Government.

Quote
Quote
First and formost, the government of Atlasia will in no way recognize the upcoming vote in the Southeast as legitimate.  The region shall remain a part of Atlasia regardless of the result of the vote.

Since I have already pointed out the constitutional

There are none. StatesRights v. Atlasia already dismisses the idea that regions have the power to nullify legislation and that they must submit to the legislation enacted by the Senate as long as it's constitutional. If the regional seats are done away with through normal constitutional amendment procedure and the South then nullifies that law and seceeds they are going against a previous Supreme Court ruling. Unlike the United States, you cannot make the argument that the Supreme Court does not hold the power of judicial review, since this stems from the judicial powers given to it in Article III of the Constitution including the power to nullify and void legislation.

Quote
historical

What the hell does this mean? Most of the people in the Southeast aren't even Southerners in real life but play Southerners, a land of Northerners who like to affix a drawl and long for the day when some romanticized version of the South will rise again. The Southeast, as a completely artificial creation, has no more history than the beginnings of this nation.

Quote
moral reasons for secession in the convention thread

There are no moral reasons. This is a game and you are acting like me when I used to play Monopoly when I was little. If I was going bankrupt I would always try to kick and scream until I got my way. The Southeast is attempting to do the same now, extorting the federal government and the citizens of the other regions so that something they don't like isn't enacted. That's about as moral as 8 year old me's tantrums over the rent on Park Place.

Quote
could you please explain what constitutional authority you have to stop secession, in Article II of the Atlasian Constitution?

The Supreme Court ruling Sam Spade v. Porce concluded that executive power is only limited by the Constitution itself. As long as the President does not actively violate the Constitution he can do whatever he likes, in essence. There is no stated set of powers for the executive but it is stated that he has them. Therefore the Senate concluded that the Presidential powers are not limited by anything more than the Constitutional limits set on all actions and legislation. As the Constitution does not explicitly state that regions have the right to secession than, under the Sam Spade v. Porce ruling, he has the power to stop secession, if he so chooses.


Quote
Quote
Secondly, it is the opinion of this administration that secession from the Republic of Atlasia constitutes treason under the Consolidated Criminal Justice Act.  The government will not hesitate to seek the prosecution of responsible parties in this act of rebellion.

According to Wikipedia's law entry for treason, the legal definition for treason is:
"...[a]...citizen's actions to help a foreign government overthrow, make war against, or seriously injure the [parent nation]."

We have no intent to overthrow the government of Atlasia, we just would like to leave it on our own terms, a victimless crime. We have no intent to make war against the government of Atlasia, we have sought peace. We also have no intention of injuring the nation, as we hope that Atlasian life continues on even when we are our own republic. Also, even if we were to assume that the secessionists we doing any of thse things, it still would not constitute treason, as the Southeast is a regional government, not a foreign government.

It will constitute treason if the President attempts to, under the powers that he was shown to have under the ruling Sam Spade v. Porce and as Commander-in-Chief of Atlasia, subdue the secession and you attempt to resist. I would say resisting the orders of the President to cease what you are currently doing would constitute treason in Atlasia since we are not a physical entity we cannot take up physical arms against the government but only either pretend to do so, through RPing, or by acting refusing to acknowledge the orders of that government. You of course aren't looking at the relevant text at all, when was the last time Atlasian law was determined by Wikipedia for Christ's sake, you need to look at the afformentioned Consolidated Criminal Justice Act.

Quote
Quote
In the meantime, the President encourages the residents of the Southeast to protect their own rights and reject the efforts of a small minority that wishes to destroy our union.

How about the small minority in Nyman that wishes to abolish regional senate elections?

If it is such a small number, as you suggest, why the theatrics? If it is such a small number it is unlikely to get pass the Senate and even more unlikely to pass in the required number of regions. If it is such a small minority why bother this nation with your antics and just let the normal democratic course play out?

Quote
Shouldn't we protect our rights against them?

You can do that by voting against the amendment. It's within every citizens rights, and indeed duty, to take a stand on the subject and vote accordingly and then to either live with the result of those votes or attempt to change them through democratic means.

Quote
Also, how does the seceding of a region infringe upon the residents' rights?

Because I'll bet you about 6 people will vote in this upcoming election. You, DWTL, PiT, Duke, Brandon, and somebody else, maybe Bacon King. The four of you will vote for it with probably two or three against. The motion will pass with roughly 4 out of the 22 or so Southeast residents. That definitely sounds like both a minority and an infringement upon the rights of the 18 or so people who don't want to seceed and what to remain a part of Atlasia.

Quote
The Dirty South has already let two Unionists freely declare themselves independent, so we cannot be said to be forcing the secessionist government upon the people.

Joke secessions by one person, one of them ended it quickly and moved to the Mideast. The other is Andy Jackson. Neither of which has been supported by either myself, the President, or anyone in government.

Quote
We are merely letting the secessionists have their own government. If anyone is infringing upon Southerners' rights, it is you, Mr. President, for attempting to force the secessionists to be part of an Atlasian Union they do not wish to be a part of.

There is no Atlasian Union there is the Atlasian state. In reality we are a singular entity that, back in 2004, we decided to carve up into 5 arbitrary regions in order to simulate states. Atlasia has been a country of faux-federalism, unlike a normal federal republic where the states were independent entities prior to federation, in Atlasia the regions did not exist until the after the federal government and were only create and codified in the first constitution, which was a federal entity.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Colin on August 08, 2008, 10:57:44 PM
Also I don't want to hear SPC talking like he knows the fucking Constitution. Atlasia's Constitution is not America's and his knowledge of it is probably a hell of alot less than mine. We aren't debating the meaning of phrases written down 200 years ago, these were written three years ago, mostly by Peter Bell with some input and advice from myself, Ernest, Al, and a few others. I also served nearly a year on the Supreme Court, 3 months of that as Chief Justice. I think I know what the hell I'm talking about.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: minionofmidas on August 09, 2008, 08:45:32 AM
What do you win? This is a damn computer simulation. We can just set up a loyal Southeastern government.

And what constitutional authority would the Atlasian government have to do that?

None whatsoever, of course. Just as when we made the same error (of setting up regional governments, then pretending they were genuine federal entities that came together to set up Atlasia) the first time.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: SPC on August 09, 2008, 10:49:07 AM
Also I don't want to hear SPC talking like he knows the fucking Constitution. Atlasia's Constitution is not America's and his knowledge of it is probably a hell of alot less than mine. We aren't debating the meaning of phrases written down 200 years ago, these were written three years ago, mostly by Peter Bell with some input and advice from myself, Ernest, Al, and a few others. I also served nearly a year on the Supreme Court, 3 months of that as Chief Justice. I think I know what the hell I'm talking about.

Sorry, Colin. I was not aware that participating in a game earlier makes one more literate.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Colin on August 09, 2008, 11:21:32 AM
Also I don't want to hear SPC talking like he knows the fucking Constitution. Atlasia's Constitution is not America's and his knowledge of it is probably a hell of alot less than mine. We aren't debating the meaning of phrases written down 200 years ago, these were written three years ago, mostly by Peter Bell with some input and advice from myself, Ernest, Al, and a few others. I also served nearly a year on the Supreme Court, 3 months of that as Chief Justice. I think I know what the hell I'm talking about.

Sorry, Colin. I was not aware that participating in a game earlier makes one more literate.

No, but writing the fucking Constitution does. Crazy ass libertarians, now I know why I couldn't stand Ron Paul and his fanboys after a while.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 10, 2008, 11:45:03 AM
I move that we change the party name to the Regional Preservation Party (gotta use the old acronyms :))


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 10, 2008, 03:29:29 PM
I move that we change the party name to the Regional Preservation Party (gotta use the old acronyms :))

     I would rather change it to Allied Atlasian Rightist Party -- AARP for short.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: John Dibble on August 10, 2008, 07:52:41 PM
I move that we change the party name to the Regional Preservation Party (gotta use the old acronyms :))

     I would rather change it to Allied Atlasian Rightist Party -- AARP for short.

Tread lightly - the old folks would get quite angry at you stealing their acronym.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 10, 2008, 07:56:03 PM
I move that we change the party name to the Regional Preservation Party (gotta use the old acronyms :))

     I would rather change it to Allied Atlasian Rightist Party -- AARP for short.

Tread lightly - the old folks would get quite angry at you stealing their acronym.

     Indeed. I was going for something self-satirizing with the acronym, since the stereotype of conservative Republicans is a bunch of angry, old people.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 11, 2008, 04:32:20 PM
     I recently noticed that the amendment at dispute has moved to the Senate floor. I'll be closely following the proceedings.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 11, 2008, 04:58:12 PM
After further consideration, we will be dropping secession from both the name and party platform.  We will simply be pushing for regional rights


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Colin on August 11, 2008, 04:58:44 PM
After further consideration, we will be dropping secession from both the name and party platform.  We will simply be pushing for regional rights

So all of you are going to re-register as the Southern Party?


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 11, 2008, 04:59:45 PM
After further consideration, we will be dropping secession from both the name and party platform.  We will simply be pushing for regional rights

So all of you are going to re-register as the Southern Party?
The new name and any new membership is still being discussed


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 11, 2008, 05:06:57 PM
After further consideration, we will be dropping secession from both the name and party platform.  We will simply be pushing for regional rights

So all of you are going to re-register as the Southern Party?
The new name and any new membership is still being discussed

     So far, we have gotten three suggestions:

Regional Protection Party (RPP)
Allied Atlasian Rightist Party (AARP)
Atlasian Tea Party (ATP)

     As party whip, I'm in charge of recruiting members. This is also a nationwide act from now on. :)


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 11, 2008, 05:08:57 PM
I personally like Regional Protection Party because I regret never joining the Ron Paul Party.  I could also go for something a bit more out there, perhaps Regions Ending Get Insane Crazy Idiots Dumbasses Excited (REGICIDE) :)


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 11, 2008, 05:11:48 PM
I personally like Regional Protection Party because I regret never joining the Ron Paul Party.  I could also go for something a bit more out there, perhaps Regions Ending Get Insane Crazy Idiots Dumbasses Excited (REGICIDE) :)

     I notified several fellow right-wingers about the change in platform. Perhaps when they join, we can hold a referendum on a new name.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 11, 2008, 05:12:18 PM
I personally like Regional Protection Party because I regret never joining the Ron Paul Party.  I could also go for something a bit more out there, perhaps Regions Ending Get Insane Crazy Idiots Dumbasses Excited (REGICIDE) :)

That made no sense.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 12, 2008, 12:39:11 AM
I personally like Regional Protection Party because I regret never joining the Ron Paul Party.  I could also go for something a bit more out there, perhaps Regions Ending Get Insane Crazy Idiots Dumbasses Excited (REGICIDE) :)

That made no sense.

     It's not supposed to make sense. :) Though I have a strong feeling that I am the only one who takes this party seriously. If you'll notice, neither Governor Duke nor any of the other people I invited has re-registered yet. :(

     Maybe getting a new name is more important than I had previously thought.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on August 12, 2008, 12:54:41 AM
I just joined. I was being a lazy bum is my only excuse for not reregistering sooner.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 12, 2008, 12:59:27 AM
I just joined. I was being a lazy bum is my only excuse for not reregistering sooner.

     Yes! Now we only need one more person & then we'll be recognized as a major party! Of the nine people I contacted, four have shown interest in joining so far.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 12, 2008, 12:19:26 PM
After discussing it over with some members, in order to help boost our cause and membership we are renaming to the Regional Protection Party


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 12, 2008, 12:33:18 PM
Once a few more members join we will elect a chair, vice-chair and vote on the following platform planks:

1.) The Regional Protection Party supports the continuation of regional senate elections
2.) The Regional Protection Party opposes efforts to expand the federal government
3.) The Regional Protection Party supports the return of a GM
4.) The Regional Protection Party supports term limits on Supreme Court justices



Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Meeker on August 12, 2008, 01:17:49 PM
Hmm... I support all but number 2...


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: HappyWarrior on August 12, 2008, 01:22:42 PM
Four for me is a deal breaker


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 12, 2008, 01:30:11 PM
It's not for sure, just throwing things on the ballot to see what people think.  The AUB voted on almost indentical planks


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 12, 2008, 02:19:15 PM
Meeker, that reminded me to post plank 5:

5.) The Regional Protection Party supports a constitutional convention


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 12, 2008, 02:40:44 PM
     Also, we could find non-game related issues to emphasize as well, like the death penalty or abortion. It will be hard to find issues though, because of the amount of variance in the beliefs of the party members.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 12, 2008, 02:42:46 PM
     Also, we could find non-game related issues to emphasize as well, like the death penalty or abortion. It will be hard to find issues though, because of the amount of variance in the beliefs of the party members.

Variance? At this point, the party is uniformly right-libertarian.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 12, 2008, 02:53:11 PM
     Also, we could find non-game related issues to emphasize as well, like the death penalty or abortion. It will be hard to find issues though, because of the amount of variance in the beliefs of the party members.

Variance? At this point, the party is uniformly right-libertarian.

     True, though I have invited several right-populists & staunch conservatives. As such, there will probably be variance in the future.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on August 12, 2008, 03:06:01 PM
I support a few points of this. And I can side, to some extent, with the federalists (Damn. Feels weird using that term in this context). But I probably won't join.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 12, 2008, 03:27:55 PM
I support a few points of this. And I can side, to some extent, with the federalists (Damn. Feels weird using that term in this context). But I probably won't join.

     Allies are always appreciated. Not to mention it would be trouble to create a map with Puerto Rico. Anyway, here's the map of membership so far:

(
)

     Southeast heavy I must say. :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 12, 2008, 03:47:48 PM
Ah! So someone else is using my format!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_colors

Pick a color.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on August 12, 2008, 03:51:24 PM


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 12, 2008, 04:00:13 PM
Ah! So someone else is using my format!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_colors

Pick a color.

     Okay, here's the sprite version:

(
)

     As I'm sure you could tell, I picked yellow (Sprite forever! >:().


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 12, 2008, 04:03:01 PM
Which shade of yellow?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 12, 2008, 04:06:23 PM

     The ones that the Atlas uses. ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 12, 2008, 04:06:58 PM

No. That's too boring. Pick a fancy shade. Or at least specify the percentage.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 12, 2008, 04:07:33 PM

No. That's too boring. Pick a fancy shade. Or at least specify the percentage.

     You mean as in the percentage of the state's population?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on August 12, 2008, 04:08:21 PM
He means what yellow colour you want the RPP to use on the Wiki.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 12, 2008, 04:09:57 PM
He means what yellow colour you want the RPP to use on the Wiki.

Yes, exactly.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 12, 2008, 04:10:42 PM

     DarkKhaki in that case. ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on August 12, 2008, 04:11:01 PM

Unrelated, but I saw that you changed the DC colour to the Wikipedia colour for the real-DC.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 12, 2008, 04:12:37 PM

Unrelated, but I saw that you changed the DC colour to the Wikipedia colour for the real-DC.

Did I? I didn't mean to.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on August 12, 2008, 04:14:38 PM

Both ways, I don't mind. The DC is dead and will probably never be resurrected. I won't come back to my old parties, methinks.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 12, 2008, 04:16:14 PM

Both ways, I don't mind. The DC is dead and will probably never be resurrected. I won't come back to my old parties, methinks.

Why make so many, then?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on August 12, 2008, 04:19:15 PM

Both ways, I don't mind. The DC is dead and will probably never be resurrected. I won't come back to my old parties, methinks.

Why make so many, then?

Fun.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 12, 2008, 04:21:21 PM

Both ways, I don't mind. The DC is dead and will probably never be resurrected. I won't come back to my old parties, methinks.

Why make so many, then?

Fun.

Like your avatars?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on August 12, 2008, 04:23:49 PM

Both ways, I don't mind. The DC is dead and will probably never be resurrected. I won't come back to my old parties, methinks.

Why make so many, then?

Fun.

Like your avatars?

I rarely change them anymore, you might've noticed.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 12, 2008, 04:27:36 PM

Both ways, I don't mind. The DC is dead and will probably never be resurrected. I won't come back to my old parties, methinks.

Why make so many, then?

Fun.

Like your avatars?

I rarely change them anymore, you might've noticed.

     I'm thinking of donning an R-UK avatar. I've never seen one around here & I'm half-British anyway.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on August 12, 2008, 04:38:05 PM

Both ways, I don't mind. The DC is dead and will probably never be resurrected. I won't come back to my old parties, methinks.

Why make so many, then?

Fun.

Like your avatars?

I rarely change them anymore, you might've noticed.

     I'm thinking of donning an R-UK avatar. I've never seen one around here & I'm half-British anyway.

I'll put on a G-FR or I-FR avatar when I go to France next week.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 12, 2008, 04:41:12 PM

Both ways, I don't mind. The DC is dead and will probably never be resurrected. I won't come back to my old parties, methinks.

Why make so many, then?

Fun.

Like your avatars?

I rarely change them anymore, you might've noticed.

     I'm thinking of donning an R-UK avatar. I've never seen one around here & I'm half-British anyway.

I'll put on a G-FR or I-FR avatar when I go to France next week.

     There, I changed my avatar.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 12, 2008, 04:41:44 PM

Both ways, I don't mind. The DC is dead and will probably never be resurrected. I won't come back to my old parties, methinks.

Why make so many, then?

Fun.

Like your avatars?

I rarely change them anymore, you might've noticed.

     I'm thinking of donning an R-UK avatar. I've never seen one around here & I'm half-British anyway.

I'll put on a G-FR or I-FR avatar when I go to France next week.

     There, I changed my avatar.

No! The shape of California is way better.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 12, 2008, 04:44:07 PM

Both ways, I don't mind. The DC is dead and will probably never be resurrected. I won't come back to my old parties, methinks.

Why make so many, then?

Fun.

Like your avatars?

I rarely change them anymore, you might've noticed.

     I'm thinking of donning an R-UK avatar. I've never seen one around here & I'm half-British anyway.

I'll put on a G-FR or I-FR avatar when I go to France next week.

     There, I changed my avatar.

No! The shape of California is way better.

     I've always wanted an R-UK avatar though. I'll change it back in a few hours. ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 12, 2008, 04:55:30 PM
Again with the people that don't understand the idea of voting :P



Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 12, 2008, 08:10:53 PM

     I wonder though if this means that ben is thinking about joining the RPP. We always welcome brave citizens looking to add a few drops of lemon to the can of Sprite that is Atlasia. ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 13, 2008, 03:21:01 AM
     I am pleased to announce that the RPP's wiki (https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/Regional_Protection_Party) is now online. It's not that big yet, but it's only the first draft. :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on August 13, 2008, 06:54:36 AM
USE CATEGORIES, DAMMIT


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 13, 2008, 12:08:29 PM
     The infobox for the party isn't showing up correctly. I've checked the revisions (I could have sworn that it worked with the first version), but I don't see what the problem is with it.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 13, 2008, 12:36:29 PM
     The infobox for the party isn't showing up correctly. I've checked the revisions (I could have sworn that it worked with the first version), but I don't see what the problem is with it.

A lot of things. Not experienced with Wikipedia, I assume?

I'll fix it.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 13, 2008, 01:04:16 PM
     The infobox for the party isn't showing up correctly. I've checked the revisions (I could have sworn that it worked with the first version), but I don't see what the problem is with it.

A lot of things. Not experienced with Wikipedia, I assume?

I'll fix it.

     Thank you. & you're right, thisis the first wiki article I've ever worked on. It's strange though, because in the first edition, the infobox worked perfectly.

     UPDATE: The wiki inffobox is once again working properly.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 14, 2008, 05:09:59 AM
     Updated map (including meeker & dead0man):

(
)

     EDIT: Daniel Adams joined the RPP. That makes 5 members in the Southeast, 2 in the Midwest, & 1 in the Mideast.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 14, 2008, 05:05:59 PM
Time to get a name change.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 14, 2008, 05:11:13 PM

     How come?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 14, 2008, 05:12:08 PM

The name annoys me.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on August 14, 2008, 05:12:42 PM

How about the Conservative Reform Alliance Party?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 14, 2008, 05:16:40 PM

     Makes me think of Wayne Gretsky doing an impression of MC Hammer.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 14, 2008, 05:17:08 PM

To be soon renamed the Atlasian Reform Conservative Alliance?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 14, 2008, 05:18:24 PM

     When we hold our convention, we'll discuss a name change.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 14, 2008, 05:20:14 PM

When'll that be?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 14, 2008, 05:22:21 PM

     I don't know. I guess when DWTL decides we have enough members.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on August 14, 2008, 05:23:19 PM
So, who exactly is leader here? DWTL or you?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 14, 2008, 05:25:07 PM
     DWTL is the interim chairman. I'm the interim vice-chairman.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 14, 2008, 05:25:18 PM
     DWTL is the interim chairman. I'm the interim vice-chairman.

LOL.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 14, 2008, 05:26:33 PM

     What's so funny? :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 14, 2008, 05:27:23 PM
What's he done? All of nothing, I think.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 14, 2008, 05:28:47 PM

     He & I regularly confer via PM about the party's course of action.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hatman 🍁 on August 14, 2008, 05:56:10 PM

:D

I would love putting in that abbreviation


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 14, 2008, 06:19:59 PM
As PiT stated, we confer quite regularly through PMs.  BTW, I offered PiT the chairmanship but he said he wanted to yield it to me because he felt he better fit for recruiting and since I had been an Atlasian much longer I would be a better fit for the chair.  Personally, I don't think it matters much, everything action we take I plan on calling a vote.  So I guess you could say my main responsibility as chair for right is setting up voting booths


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 14, 2008, 08:02:44 PM
We have 8 members (SPC still registered as SSP, but know where he is).  At 10 I motion for a convention and votes.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 14, 2008, 11:29:29 PM
I encourage the party to first preference myself, and in a bid for activity 2nd preference Xahar


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 14, 2008, 11:38:06 PM
     I second the motion to endorse DWTL & Xahar for 1st & 2nd preference respectively.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 14, 2008, 11:47:40 PM
I'd also like to endorse Xahar for Pacific governor


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 14, 2008, 11:59:00 PM
     I support that too (even though we have no party members in the Pacific).


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: HappyWarrior on August 15, 2008, 12:13:28 PM
I hope that as a fellow supporter of regional rights that I can get a high ballot preference from the RPP in the Senate election.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 15, 2008, 01:20:21 PM
     I don't like voting in the absentee booth, but I'm too antsy about our first election, so I'll go ahead & vote now.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 16, 2008, 08:35:15 PM
     Updated through MasterJedi:

(
)

     To date, we haven't gotten two members in one state. 5 Southeast, 2 Midwest, 2 Mideast.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 17, 2008, 09:09:46 PM
One member and I'll a vote on the platform and whether to retain myself as chair and PiT as vice-chair/whip/greatest recruiter ever


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Torie on August 17, 2008, 09:45:18 PM
Other than the protection of regional voting rights, does this party have any other agenda?  I am strongly leaning to the former in any event. The case for doing something else has not been made yet. The burden of proof is on the change agents.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 17, 2008, 09:47:18 PM
Other than the protection of regional voting rights, does this party have any other agenda?  I am strongly leaning to the former in any event. The case for doing something else has not been made yet. The burden of proof is on the change agents.
Well, we are billing ourselves as the party for conservatives, although we haven't adopted a platform to the like.  Were basically like the AUB but with a slightly right-wing tilt.  Basically we want to drastically limit any power the federal government has, even with issues that aren't Atlasia exclusive


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Torie on August 17, 2008, 09:49:16 PM
Other than the protection of regional voting rights, does this party have any other agenda?  I am strongly leaning to the former in any event. The case for doing something else has not been made yet. The burden of proof is on the change agents.
Well, we are billing ourselves as the party for conservatives, although we haven't adopted a platform to the like.  Were basically like the AUB but with a slightly right-wing tilt.  Basically we want to drastically limit any power the federal government has, even with issues that aren't Atlasia exclusive

The game might get dull, if the Senate has nothing to do.  :)  I suppose one could do an archeological dig to find out what has passed in the past that should be repealed.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 17, 2008, 09:50:57 PM
Other than the protection of regional voting rights, does this party have any other agenda?  I am strongly leaning to the former in any event. The case for doing something else has not been made yet. The burden of proof is on the change agents.
Well, we are billing ourselves as the party for conservatives, although we haven't adopted a platform to the like.  Were basically like the AUB but with a slightly right-wing tilt.  Basically we want to drastically limit any power the federal government has, even with issues that aren't Atlasia exclusive

The game might get dull, if the Senate has nothing to do.  :)
Well, there are still plenty of bills to be passed to undue federal things.  For example, my last bill on legalizing heroin was a bill about taking power away from the federal government and returning it to the regions.  I wouldn't say anything but senate activity could come from this.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Smid on August 19, 2008, 11:44:53 PM
I should like to join your new party, if the party would be willing to accept me.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 19, 2008, 11:54:22 PM
I should like to join your new party, if the party would be willing to accept me.

     New members are always welcome. :)

     EDIT: here's the newest version of the map:

(
)

     This means that we now have members in every region except the Pacific. In total, we have 5 in the Southeast, 3 in the Mideast, 2 in the Midwest, & 1 in the Northeast.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 20, 2008, 08:20:32 AM
I should like to join your new party, if the party would be willing to accept me.
We are more than willing to accept and encourage to vote for our endorsed slate of candidates

Which you have already done :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 20, 2008, 09:53:01 AM
Alright, I was going to hold off on voting, but I thought I should do it since the RPP preferences are well-known at this point anyway:

[ 1 ] Fmr. Sen. DWTL
[ 2 ] SDP Chairman Xahar
[ 3 ] Judge HappyWarrior
[ 4 ] Lt. Gov. Benconstine
[ 5 ] Sen. ColinWixted
[ 6 ] Sen. AndrewCT
[ 7 ] Fmr. Gov. Sensei
[ 8 ] Fmr. Sen. Jas
[ 9 ] WRITE-IN: Gov. AHDuke99
[ 10 ]WRITE-IN: Lt. Gov. SouthParkConservative
[ 11 ] WRITE-IN: RPP Vice-Chair PiT
[ 12 ] Sen. CultureKing

I was going to put CultureKing in before I started writing people in, but I didn't feel like renumbering :P  Party members can feel free to do so

The last three are not meant as actual votes so don't feel obligated to include them, I was just paying homage to those who have helped get this party off the ground


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MaxQue on August 20, 2008, 10:47:26 AM
Alright, I was going to hold off on voting, but I thought I should do it since the RPP preferences are well-known at this point anyway:

[ 1 ] Fmr. Sen. DWTL
[ 2 ] SDP Chairman Xahar
[ 3 ] Judge HappyWarrior
[ 4 ] Lt. Gov. Benconstine
[ 5 ] Sen. ColinWixted
[ 6 ] Sen. AndrewCT
[ 7 ] Fmr. Gov. Sensei
[ 8 ] Fmr. Sen. Jas
[ 9 ] WRITE-IN: Gov. AHDuke99
[ 10 ]WRITE-IN: Lt. Gov. SouthParkConservative
[ 11 ] WRITE-IN: RPP Vice-Chair PiT
[ 12 ] Sen. CultureKing

I was going to put CultureKing in before I started writing people in, but I didn't feel like renumbering :P  Party members can feel free to do so

The last three are not meant as actual votes so don't feel obligated to include them, I was just paying homage to those who have helped get this party off the ground

Wht Al isn't on your ballot?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 20, 2008, 11:57:42 AM
Alright, I was going to hold off on voting, but I thought I should do it since the RPP preferences are well-known at this point anyway:

[ 1 ] Fmr. Sen. DWTL
[ 2 ] SDP Chairman Xahar
[ 3 ] Judge HappyWarrior
[ 4 ] Lt. Gov. Benconstine
[ 5 ] Sen. ColinWixted
[ 6 ] Sen. AndrewCT
[ 7 ] Fmr. Gov. Sensei
[ 8 ] Fmr. Sen. Jas
[ 9 ] WRITE-IN: Gov. AHDuke99
[ 10 ]WRITE-IN: Lt. Gov. SouthParkConservative
[ 11 ] WRITE-IN: RPP Vice-Chair PiT
[ 12 ] Sen. CultureKing

I was going to put CultureKing in before I started writing people in, but I didn't feel like renumbering :P  Party members can feel free to do so

The last three are not meant as actual votes so don't feel obligated to include them, I was just paying homage to those who have helped get this party off the ground

Wht Al isn't on your ballot?
I could go on a huge list, but I could with
1.) Accusing my of loving the Holocaust
2.) Overreacting to a joke about a Jewish conspriacy
3.) He repeated calling of the RPP a party of trolls

And on and on


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on August 20, 2008, 09:02:50 PM

That's a lie. I did not accuse you of loving the holocaust I find your attitude towards the holocaust (which is characterised by callous, brattish sneering and a total lack of humanity) to be utterly despicable and to reflect extremely poorly on you as a person, but that's not the same thing.
Quote
2.) Overreacting to a joke about a Jewish conspriacy

You are either an anti-semite or so utterly clueless as to find pretending to be an anti-semite amusing. I look at anything you write about the Jews in the light of that. And so should everyone else.

Quote
3.) He repeated calling of the RPP a party of trolls

Now lets see... at the time I made that little remark the only members of your party (whatever it was called then) that I was aware of were you and that nasty rape-loving racist, Duke. Both you are trolls. I wouldn't make that claim now as there are clearly non-trolls in your party (though I've no idea why).


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: dead0man on August 22, 2008, 01:41:36 AM
I didn't want to clutter up the voting booth, but can somebody try and convince me one way or the other on term limits for the Supremes?  (or point me to the appropriate thread)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 22, 2008, 07:52:46 AM
I didn't want to clutter up the voting booth, but can somebody try and convince me one way or the other on term limits for the Supremes?  (or point me to the appropriate thread)
It was a debate that came up awhile and I was trying to gauge opinions.  The idea isn't that the SC cannot serve more than 12 months, its that they have to be reconfirmed.  If a justice is not doing their job, the senate should have the right to remove them IMHO


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: dead0man on August 22, 2008, 08:17:14 AM
They can't impeach?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 22, 2008, 08:19:39 AM
They could, but the process is lenghty and requires an incredible supermajority.  Under the term limits scenario, a simply majority is all that would be require for gaining another term.  And remember, one year is an enternity in Atlas time, very few justices serve that long.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: dead0man on August 22, 2008, 09:23:08 AM
Aye....makes sense.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 22, 2008, 11:55:20 AM
The RPP will be coming out with a big announcement following the election

STAY TUNED


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 22, 2008, 12:05:19 PM
I didn't want to clutter up the voting booth, but can somebody try and convince me one way or the other on term limits for the Supremes?  (or point me to the appropriate thread)
It was a debate that came up awhile and I was trying to gauge opinions.  The idea isn't that the SC cannot serve more than 12 months, its that they have to be reconfirmed.  If a justice is not doing their job, the senate should have the right to remove them IMHO

     Oh. If I had known that's what you meant, I would've voted yes.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 22, 2008, 12:37:48 PM
The RPP will be coming out with a big announcement following the election

STAY TUNED

*stays tuned*


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 22, 2008, 12:48:44 PM
Tell Duke to stop buying date rape drugs long enough to open the voting booth.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on August 22, 2008, 03:58:14 PM
I've joined the party.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 22, 2008, 04:27:29 PM
:)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on August 22, 2008, 04:49:41 PM

I was going to before, but I got really busy and kinda forgot.  lol


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on August 22, 2008, 04:51:14 PM

:)  Welcome to the Party.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 22, 2008, 05:51:51 PM
     The map through Inks:

(
)

     In total, we have 5 members in the Southeast, 4 in the Mideast, 2 in the Midwest, & 1 in the Northeast.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on August 22, 2008, 08:01:04 PM
One of Down's many interesting features is the fact that he's too cowardly to respond to just criticism.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 22, 2008, 08:37:21 PM
One of Down's many interesting features is the fact that he's too cowardly to respond to just criticism.
??  Idk the last time I refused to answer a question.  If I missed something feel free to bump it and I'll answer it


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on August 22, 2008, 08:39:07 PM

That's a lie. I did not accuse you of loving the holocaust I find your attitude towards the holocaust (which is characterised by callous, brattish sneering and a total lack of humanity) to be utterly despicable and to reflect extremely poorly on you as a person, but that's not the same thing.
Quote
2.) Overreacting to a joke about a Jewish conspriacy

You are either an anti-semite or so utterly clueless as to find pretending to be an anti-semite amusing. I look at anything you write about the Jews in the light of that. And so should everyone else.

Quote
3.) He repeated calling of the RPP a party of trolls

Now lets see... at the time I made that little remark the only members of your party (whatever it was called then) that I was aware of were you and that nasty rape-loving racist, Duke. Both you are trolls. I wouldn't make that claim now as there are clearly non-trolls in your party (though I've no idea why).


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 22, 2008, 08:48:51 PM
That's a lie. I did not accuse you of loving the holocaust I find your attitude towards the holocaust (which is characterised by callous, brattish sneering and a total lack of humanity) to be utterly despicable and to reflect extremely poorly on you as a person, but that's not the same thing.
That's not my view of the Holocaust at all, the comment was mocking people who think of the Holocaust as something to take lightly

Quote
You are either an anti-semite or so utterly clueless as to find pretending to be an anti-semite amusing. I look at anything you write about the Jews in the light of that. And so should everyone else.
That statement is so absurd there is really nothing to respond with.  See statement above

Quote
Now lets see... at the time I made that little remark the only members of your party (whatever it was called then) that I was aware of were you and that nasty rape-loving racist, Duke. Both you are trolls. I wouldn't make that claim now as there are clearly non-trolls in your party (though I've no idea why).
There is nothing that suggests either myself or Duke fits the definition of a troll.  The fact that we disagree with you does not make us trolls.  Obviously a lot of people feel the same way considering those that joined the party and voted in the affirmative for getting me as the chair


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on August 22, 2008, 09:42:57 PM
That's not my view of the Holocaust at all, the comment was mocking people who think of the Holocaust as something to take lightly

People who do not understand irony cannot claim it in order to defend themselves.

Quote
That statement is so absurd there is really nothing to respond with.  See statement above

Your own words do defeat you:

Hardcore jews are some dangerous people and they definetly have more influence over our government.

Everytime I see this topic I keep thinking it says "Impact of Jews on the Movies"

I hate the term "anti-Semetic", people get the impression that Semetic is somehow synonumous with "jew" which it is not at all.  It pretty much means the Middle East as a whole I believe. 

The fact that I despise Israel and would support Muslims over Jews no matter what the case (balance purposes) in an election isn't really closested :P


I know convinced due to today's spike Israel is responsible for high gas prices, yet we keep supporting these bastards

This is just more proof that the existence of a Jewish state in Israel is the biggest road block to world peace

1.) I believe he knew about it
2.) He attacked the wrong goddamn country, much worse than Bush going after Iraq AFTER Afghanistan
3.) His aid of the British and taking it up the ass from Churchill is why they were so pissed

===

1.) Lincoln encouraged war too, this was nothing new
2.) He went to war with Japan after Germany
3.) Sounds like the stupid Israeli policy that is screwing us now

Then there's this sorry thread: https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=52952.0
And some stuff here also: https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=43926.0

And so on and so forth. Plenty more out there. I'm sure that you'll now claim irony again (though see my earlier post for why that'd still be disgusting). Or trot out your sad little cop-out that "hating Israel isn't anti-semitic".

One of the many interesting things about the virus of anti-semitism is quite how obsessive those who suffer from it can become. Seeps into all kinds of things. Of course, it's possible that you're just a nasty little shit who gets a kick out of pretending to be an anti-semite because other people find anti-semitism so disgusting. Either way...

Quote
There is nothing that suggests either myself or Duke fits the definition of a troll.

You are certainly both monsters, and that's proof enough for me.

Quote
The fact that we disagree with you does not make us trolls.

Amusing. Actually I get on quite well with plenty of people here who I disagree with greatly in political matters.

Quote
Obviously a lot of people feel the same way considering those that joined the party and voted in the affirmative for getting me as the chair

I wonder how many would have done so if they knew that you have proudly declared that you would vote for Hitler.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Torie on August 23, 2008, 01:53:59 AM
:(


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 23, 2008, 01:55:26 AM

     Sad about anything in particular?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 23, 2008, 07:22:58 AM
My two personal favorites that Al pulled out of there was when I said "Effect of Jews on the Movies" because I read it wrong, and when I defined that anti-Semitism was commonly mistaken to only refer to Jews when it technically means the Middle East as a whole.  But seriously Al, get a life instead of reading old threads desperatley trying to find something that does not exist.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 24, 2008, 12:16:54 PM
Congrats everyone!  We got every single member of the party out to vote :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 24, 2008, 03:08:24 PM
Now, with 13 members we are the second largest party in Atlasia.  Thanks to PiT's recruiting and an effort to keep all our members active, we hope to remain a force.  Even if a huge movement knocks me off in the last few hours, we showed that we are something to be reckon with.

Hopefully in the next nationwide election we can run 2 candidates, and the presidential race remains up in the air for now.  The big announcement on our future is tentatively scheduled for later on tonight.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 24, 2008, 05:18:12 PM
And here is the big announcement (alright maybe it won't excite you that much :) ):

BREAKING NEWS

Following the pickup of a senate seat in the recent August midterm election, the RPP looks to build on its success.  For this, it is only appropriate that the party turns to the region where it exploded and to the person who made it all possible.  It is with great pleasure that I announce PiT will be making his fantasy politics debut in the October Southeast senate race!


Alright, so maybe its not that big of a deal but we want to make sure our party keeps paying attention ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 24, 2008, 05:19:08 PM
Oh, this? Damn, you could've said that it was news I already knew. ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 24, 2008, 05:20:13 PM
Oh, this? Damn, you could've said that it was news I already knew. ;)
You might have been the only outside of the party I think, although I guess almost everyone could have seen it coming.  We are targeting this as our prime pick-up opportunity in the next election after my narrow loss last time around.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 24, 2008, 05:45:24 PM
     It would be my honor to run for regional Senator of the Southeast. I hope that I receive serious consideration from all the citizens of the Southeast.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 26, 2008, 06:02:23 PM
Official Party Statement on Southeast Elections

The party would like to issue congradulations to both Gov. Duke on his re-election and the new Lt. Gov. Andy Jackson.  Although the party is sad to lose the Lt. Gov. office in SouthParkConservative, we can understand why voters may have been skeptical at his recent abscene.  We look forward to working with Mr. Jackson toward the continued rebirth of our wonderful region.  God Bless the Dirty South and all of Atlasia


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 27, 2008, 02:03:11 PM
This thread will continue to serve as the party's official headquarters for the time being:

Official Statement on Pending Constitutional Amendment

The party urges all its members, and others of course, to urge their senators to oppose the constitutional amendment at a vote that would end regional senate seats.  We must stand together against this massive intrusion on the rights of the regions.  If the amendment passes the senate, then we urge everyone to vote against it in their respective regions.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 28, 2008, 08:17:39 AM
Official Endorsement

The RPP officially endorses Inks and HappyWarrior in their bids for the Mideast assembly.  The endorsement for the 3rd seat will held off on at this time


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on August 28, 2008, 09:51:57 AM

That's an interesting new expression for astroturf.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 29, 2008, 08:00:59 AM
"We are the Champions" plays in the background:

The constitutional amendment to eliminate regional power in the senate has failed!  God Bless Atlasia!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: HappyWarrior on August 29, 2008, 08:03:13 AM
"We are the Champions" plays in the background:

The constitutional amendment to eliminate regional power in the senate has failed!  God Dave Bless Atlasia!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on August 29, 2008, 12:40:25 PM
Praise the great Jesus Christ in Heaven, my friends! For he has smiled down on us today and helped the weak and meek RPP defeat this overstepping amendment. This isn't just a great day for southerners, but a great day for Americans. May God continue to shower us with sweet tea, fried chicken, and beautiful women as we continue to send Him our blessings. GOD BLESS THE DIRTY, DIRTY SOUTH!!!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on August 29, 2008, 12:42:09 PM
Atlasians dammit, not Americans.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 29, 2008, 01:59:11 PM
     In this victory, I extend my deepest thanks to Senators Meeker, Torie, CK, & Andrew for voting nay on this amendment. Sadly, Andrew lost his bid for re-election, but I wish him a bright future as head of the Northeastern Judiciary.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 29, 2008, 08:55:31 PM
     The map through Ronnie:

(
)

     Now we have members in all five regions. In total, we have 6 members in the Southeast, 4 in the Mideast, 2 in the Midwest, 1 in the Northeast, & 1 in the Pacific.



Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on August 31, 2008, 04:35:15 PM
I don't want to sound like an alarmist, but I caution all RPP members to be wary of xahar. The recent controvery over accusations that he is using the account of cookies n milk makes me think that he is attempting to undermine our party. Cookies n milk cast the tie breaking vote that defeated RPP member SPC and was 2 votes from becoming governor of our great region.

Xahars statements warning me that he had a lot of power in our region is making sense. Because of this, I warn our party members to be wary of him.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 31, 2008, 06:42:17 PM
I don't want to sound like an alarmist, but I caution all RPP members to be wary of xahar. The recent controvery over accusations that he is using the account of cookies n milk makes me think that he is attempting to undermine our party. Cookies n milk cast the tie breaking vote that defeated RPP member SPC and was 2 votes from becoming governor of our great region.

Xahars statements warning me that he had a lot of power in our region is making sense. Because of this, I warn our party members to be wary of him.
I'd like to believe not, but it does seem I bit strange.  We'll place him on official party notice for now, but continue to regard him as an ally against those who wish to harm the regions


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 31, 2008, 06:59:14 PM
Well, that's not exactly what I was referring to when I was talking about my power in the Southeast. Besides, if I was Cookies and Milk, there'd have been more than one vote in the infamous July election.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Smid on August 31, 2008, 07:44:11 PM
     In this victory, I extend my deepest thanks to Senators Meeker, Torie, CK, & Andrew for voting nay on this amendment. Sadly, Andrew lost his bid for re-election, but I wish him a bright future as head of the Northeastern Judiciary.

Is this an endorsement of Andrew? Does the party support him in future elections?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 31, 2008, 09:00:49 PM
     In this victory, I extend my deepest thanks to Senators Meeker, Torie, CK, & Andrew for voting nay on this amendment. Sadly, Andrew lost his bid for re-election, but I wish him a bright future as head of the Northeastern Judiciary.

Is this an endorsement of Andrew? Does the party support him in future elections?

     I didn't intend this to be an official endorsement. Rather, I was merely extending my gratitude towards him. I suppose that we would prefer him to most other NLCers (except Sensei, of course :)).


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 05, 2008, 05:02:51 PM
Well now we control 20% of the senate :)

Anyway, I'll post it here too, vote for Inks/Franzl/Happy in the the Mideast assembly, Hashemite is one of the biggest opponents of regional rights that exists in this great nation.  I will admit I do not know much about Franzl, but he seems like a decent guy out of Atlasia so its worth the risk over the known quantity of horrendousness that is Hashemite.


Update on platform, another senate candidate, and other business shortly.  Glad to see we are staying active and getting everyone out to the polls and other things


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 05, 2008, 05:13:52 PM
Hashemite has always been a thorn in our side. I don't know if it's because he's French or because he's European, but he seems to dislike everything we stand for: personal liberty, freedom, and region's rights. Southerners didn't fight a civil war for no reason, and if he is hellbent on starting another one, I'll rally to my weapons and lay back on my old battle cry: The South will rise again, and this time, we'll win!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 05, 2008, 05:16:58 PM
Hashemite has always been a thorn in our side. I don't know if it's because he's French or because he's European, but he seems to dislike everything we stand for: personal liberty, freedom, and region's rights. Southerners didn't fight a civil war for no reason, and if he is hellbent on starting another one, I'll rally to my weapons and lay back on my old battle cry: The South will rise again, and this time, we'll win!
He probably also enjoy fancy wine and cheese that would spoil easily in the heat of the Dirty South.  Its kind of funny how much he cried over secession, when in the end he was the one who winded up seceded.  At least AJax sort of seceded and then came back to work with the Dirty South.  This kid just packed up his baguettes and mime costume and went away


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on September 05, 2008, 05:24:58 PM
I don't eat cheese. Just a heads up.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 05, 2008, 05:25:42 PM
Well thank you at least for taking your baguettes and mime costume


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on September 05, 2008, 06:12:21 PM
Well thank you at least for taking your baguettes and mime costume

I eat Kouign Amann. I'm not much into Bro C'hall cuisine.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 05, 2008, 09:26:05 PM
To quote to the great Eric Cartman, Hashemite left "because he choked on the sweet smell of freedom"


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 05, 2008, 09:52:44 PM
And you know what? Despite his constant name calling, such as fascists, authoritarians, etc, he had the FREEDOM to go. We never forced him to stay. He doesn't think about that.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 05, 2008, 09:56:42 PM
And you know what? Despite his constant name calling, such as fascists, authoritarians, etc, he had the FREEDOM to go. We never forced him to stay. He doesn't think about that.
Please, there is enough humor to revel in in the fact that he is the one who seceded.  All he did was complain about how we discussed secession if other things failed, yet he was the first one lined up to march his little ass to France and secede. 


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 05, 2008, 10:02:32 PM
And you know what? Despite his constant name calling, such as fascists, authoritarians, etc, he had the FREEDOM to go. We never forced him to stay. He doesn't think about that.
Please, there is enough humor to revel in in the fact that he is the one who seceded.  All he did was complain about how we discussed secession if other things failed, yet he was the first one lined up to march his little ass to France and secede. 

And then had the audacity to demand his vote be counted in regional matters even after he seceded. Typical French. They want you to do the work for them, but they still want a say.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on September 05, 2008, 10:36:19 PM
And you know what? Despite his constant name calling, such as fascists, authoritarians, etc, he had the FREEDOM to go. We never forced him to stay. He doesn't think about that.
Please, there is enough humor to revel in in the fact that he is the one who seceded.  All he did was complain about how we discussed secession if other things failed, yet he was the first one lined up to march his little ass to France and secede. 

And then had the audacity to demand his vote be counted in regional matters even after he seceded. Typical French. They want you to do the work for them, but they still want a say.

     In actuality, he was too lazy to head to France. He just remained where he was. Of course, that was in Puerto Rico, so there might have been some wisdom in his decision to not run. ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 06, 2008, 07:57:18 AM
BREAKING NEWS

The Regional Protection Party made a splash when they announced that PiT would challenge incumbent Bacon King in the Southeast.  Perhaps this move was quite expected, but maybe the next one is not as much.  The Regional Protection Party is proud to announce that Dead0man will be making his Atlasian political debut as a candidate in the Midwestern senate race.  We urge all party members and those who support the rights of the regions to even exist, given his opponent, to vote for him and give him all the support we can.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on September 06, 2008, 11:33:10 AM
You can't win in the Midwest.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 06, 2008, 11:35:08 AM
Well considering your track record of success of winning races looks like its time for us to give up.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on September 06, 2008, 03:33:44 PM

     I'm sure that there are plenty of Midwesterners who would take pause at his recent efforts to neuter the regions, even if they may like him personally. ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on September 06, 2008, 04:19:24 PM

     I'm sure that there are plenty of Midwesterners who would take pause at his recent efforts to neuter the regions, even if they may like him personally. ;)

I'm sure the vast majority of Midwesterners won't care. To win office there, you have to embrace the establishment and wait your turn.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 06, 2008, 05:15:18 PM

     I'm sure that there are plenty of Midwesterners who would take pause at his recent efforts to neuter the regions, even if they may like him personally. ;)

I'm sure the vast majority of Midwesterners won't care. To win office there, you have to embrace the establishment and wait your turn.
At first I was perplexed as to why Xahar took such an absurd stance, forgot Lewis was a member of the SDP


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on September 06, 2008, 05:19:23 PM

     I'm sure that there are plenty of Midwesterners who would take pause at his recent efforts to neuter the regions, even if they may like him personally. ;)

I'm sure the vast majority of Midwesterners won't care. To win office there, you have to embrace the establishment and wait your turn.
At first I was perplexed as to why Xahar took such an absurd stance, forgot Lewis was a member of the SDP

     Lewis is not just a member of the SDP. He is, so to speak, Lady MacBeth.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on September 06, 2008, 05:21:40 PM

     I'm sure that there are plenty of Midwesterners who would take pause at his recent efforts to neuter the regions, even if they may like him personally. ;)

I'm sure the vast majority of Midwesterners won't care. To win office there, you have to embrace the establishment and wait your turn.
At first I was perplexed as to why Xahar took such an absurd stance, forgot Lewis was a member of the SDP

Stance? I'm just stating facts.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 06, 2008, 05:26:09 PM
It's a very unpopulated region.  We'll see what happens when election day rolls around.  Either way we're near guaranteed three seats after this set of elections, a fourth would just be icing on the cake.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on September 06, 2008, 05:33:11 PM
It's a very unpopulated region.  We'll see what happens when election day rolls around.  Either way we're near guaranteed three seats after this set of elections, a fourth would just be icing on the cake.

Hmm. Most of the Midwest has personally been befriended by Lewis.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: ilikeverin on September 06, 2008, 11:41:39 PM
It's a very unpopulated region.  We'll see what happens when election day rolls around.  Either way we're near guaranteed three seats after this set of elections, a fourth would just be icing on the cake.

Hmm. Most of the Midwest has personally been befriended by Lewis.

Lewis is an antifederalist.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on September 06, 2008, 11:48:53 PM
It's a very unpopulated region.  We'll see what happens when election day rolls around.  Either way we're near guaranteed three seats after this set of elections, a fourth would just be icing on the cake.

Hmm. Most of the Midwest has personally been befriended by Lewis.

Lewis is an antifederalist.

     You're a Midwestern voter. If I may ask, what's your take on this race?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: dead0man on September 07, 2008, 09:23:04 AM
I'm sure the vast majority of Midwesterners won't care. To win office there, you have to embrace the establishment and wait your turn.
The people of the region know this and acknowledge it? 


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 07, 2008, 09:31:52 AM
I'm sure the vast majority of Midwesterners won't care. To win office there, you have to embrace the establishment and wait your turn.
The people of the region know this and acknowledge it? 
Please don't acknowledge Xahar, now he is pretending to know anything another region he has nothing to do with.  The funny part he never does anything for the region he actually lives in


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on September 07, 2008, 11:58:14 AM
I'm sure the vast majority of Midwesterners won't care. To win office there, you have to embrace the establishment and wait your turn.
The people of the region know this and acknowledge it? 

DWDL's gone into spite mode now (I don't know why, but he occasionally does). But the answer is yes. Thus the preponderance of smileys and *hughughug*s.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on September 07, 2008, 02:02:36 PM
I'm sure the vast majority of Midwesterners won't care. To win office there, you have to embrace the establishment and wait your turn.
The people of the region know this and acknowledge it? 

DWDL's gone into spite mode now (I don't know why, but he occasionally does). But the answer is yes. Thus the preponderance of smileys and *hughughug*s.

     The Midwest is the home of hugbox politics, I've noticed. ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: PBrunsel on September 07, 2008, 02:47:58 PM
Guys,

In case you have not noticed I was somehow elected Lt. Governor of the Midwest, so we can win in the Midwest, even if it is completely random!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on September 07, 2008, 03:00:37 PM
Guys,

In case you have not noticed I was somehow elected Lt. Governor of the Midwest, so we can win in the Midwest, even if it is completely random!

     That was pretty sweet. ;D Nevertheless, the issue isn't so much winning as it is winning against Lewis. :(


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 07, 2008, 07:12:20 PM
I'm sure the vast majority of Midwesterners won't care. To win office there, you have to embrace the establishment and wait your turn.
The people of the region know this and acknowledge it? 

DWDL's gone into spite mode now (I don't know why, but he occasionally does). But the answer is yes. Thus the preponderance of smileys and *hughughug*s.
I've gone into "not tolerating arrogance" mode.  Something I can quite often in.  Despite helping you to no end in the last election (which despite all that help you still lost because you couldn't even support from your own party) you find it necessary to trash my party and its candidates instead of doing the traditional wishing of good luck


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on September 07, 2008, 07:37:10 PM
I'm sure the vast majority of Midwesterners won't care. To win office there, you have to embrace the establishment and wait your turn.
The people of the region know this and acknowledge it? 

DWDL's gone into spite mode now (I don't know why, but he occasionally does). But the answer is yes. Thus the preponderance of smileys and *hughughug*s.
I've gone into "not tolerating arrogance" mode.  Something I can quite often in.  Despite helping you to no end in the last election (which despite all that help you still lost because you couldn't even support from your own party) you find it necessary to trash my party and its candidates instead of doing the traditional wishing of good luck

Trash? No, certainly not. I just said you have no chance. Trust me, I'm familiar with that.

Plus I like Lewis. But good luck anyway.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 07, 2008, 07:47:00 PM
Xahar, please just refrain from all commenting.  You obviously don't have this place figured out anywhere near as well I do as I have been in the senate for four terms compared to your zero


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on September 07, 2008, 11:44:42 PM
As you wish, Dear Leader.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 10, 2008, 08:53:03 PM
Statement on Mideast Assembly Crisis

The party condems Gov. Constine for not using the results of the first election, and then not using the results of the first election.  However, the party does not take a stance on his recall


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on September 10, 2008, 10:06:12 PM
     I say that we oppose his recall (he won't be there that much longer), but we withhold endorsement from him if he runs for Mideast Governor at any point in the next year or so.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 11, 2008, 08:21:22 PM
Official Statement Regarding Mideast Gubenatorial Race

The Regional Protection Party is proud to endorse Fmr. Gov. Inks to return to his old job.  Inks has stood for regional rights, compentent government, and change throughout his tenure in Atlasia.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on September 14, 2008, 07:27:57 PM
     The map through Driedapples:

(
)

     In total, we have 6 members in the Southeast, 4 in the Mideast, 2 in the Midwest, 2 in the Northeast, & 1 in the Pacific. First new recruit in over two weeks.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 18, 2008, 07:36:49 PM
Forgot about this....

Official Endorsement

To continue our efforts to bring in Atlasia new and old, the RPP is proud to announce their endorsement of the Lt. Gov. campaign of Daniel Adams


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 18, 2008, 09:39:32 PM
Rundown of federal elections:

Northeast: TBD
Mideast: Meeker
Southeast: PiT
Midwest: Dead0man
Pacific: None (the RPP will not challenge incumbent Torie)

President: TBD



Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on September 19, 2008, 07:43:34 PM
I have just joined the party and will do all I can to spread the ideals and values of the RPP!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on September 20, 2008, 03:22:51 AM
     The map through RowanBrandon (we now have two Brandons :))

(
)

     In total, we have 6 members in the Southeast, 4 in the Mideast, 3 in the Northeast, 2 in the Midwest, & 1 in the Pacific. Our position has recently improved considerably in the Northeast. :)



Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Smid on September 20, 2008, 04:15:47 AM
     The map through RowanBrandon (we now have two Brandons :))

(
)

     In total, we have 6 members in the Southeast, 4 in the Mideast, 3 in the Northeast, 2 in the Midwest, & 1 in the Pacific. Our position has recently improved considerably in the Northeast. :)



I'd love to take credit for our improvement in the Northeast (since I was the first in there), but I think all due credit is to you, PiT.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on September 20, 2008, 08:13:24 AM
PiT is the one that recruited me, so yes all credit should go to him.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 20, 2008, 08:23:59 AM
17 members strong, nearly the largest party in Atlasia :)

The more the merrier and we are still looking for new members, the battle against the NLCers and SDPers who want to destroy the regions takes a large army


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 23, 2008, 04:15:44 PM
Party convention will be held in October, finalists for the cities will be announced later this week


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Smid on September 24, 2008, 10:17:21 PM
The current push to remove the power of the regions is the greatest threat facing Atlasian freedoms today. I am very pleased to endorse RowanBrandon in his bid for the Governorship of the Northeast Region. RowanBrandon will stand up for the rights and freedoms of Northeasterners and ensure our liberties are protected. I encourage all Northeasterners to support the Northeast Region by voting for RowanBrandon.

RowanBrandon for Governor.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on September 24, 2008, 10:52:24 PM
I thank Smid for his endorsement and graciously am prepared to accept my party's nomination for position of Governor of the Northeast. I do not take these responsibilities lightly, and will make sure that ALL Northeasterners are heard. I can hear you people of the Northeast, the whole country can hear you, and Atlasia will hear all of us soon!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Robespierre's Jaw on September 24, 2008, 10:59:03 PM
A few questions directed to Mr. Brandon. Why are you running for the Governorship of the Northeast? What are your opinions of the Northeast Region's inability to produce any legislation for the last two months during our monthly proposition thread, which the Northeast was once famous for? If you are elected Governor, how will you combat this?



Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Smid on September 26, 2008, 05:05:29 AM
Conor: What's your stance on Class A Senators and the Trondheim Amendment?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 26, 2008, 03:09:42 PM
Official Endorsement

After some discussion, the RPP has decided to endorse Sec. of Awesomeness, CJ of the NE, Fmr. Sen. and Gov. AndrewCT for the NE senate seat and wish him the best of luck.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on September 26, 2008, 07:13:48 PM
Remember the "dead red avatars" Sam would constantly complain about before he got kicked into the Supreme Court and obscurity?

I think we have a far greater and opposite reaction. And when I say reaction, I mean it literally.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on September 29, 2008, 04:08:53 AM
Remember the "dead red avatars" Sam would constantly complain about before he got kicked into the Supreme Court and obscurity?

I think we have a far greater and opposite reaction. And when I say reaction, I mean it literally.

     What exactly provoked that comment, if I may inquire?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Robespierre's Jaw on September 29, 2008, 04:29:38 AM
Mr. Brandon, might you please be able to take the time to answer these questions which I asked you more than four days ago? Much appreciated, your Lieutenant Governor, Rockefeller Republican, or presently known as "Jimmy the Flute".

A few questions directed to Mr. Brandon. Why are you running for the Governorship of the Northeast? What are your opinions of the Northeast Region's inability to produce any legislation for the last two months during our monthly proposition thread, which the Northeast was once famous for? If you are elected Governor, how will you combat this?



Conor: What's your stance on Class A Senators and the Trondheim Amendment?

Sorry for the delay Smid, here's my answers regarding your questions regarding the Trondheim Amendment. To be quite frank with you Mr. Smith, as of yet I am undecided about whether or not I should support the Trondheim Amendment. Whilst on one hand it would revitalise the ever so boring Senate contests held during February, June and October, which would be great for the nation, on the other hand it would be yet another devastating blow for the regions, thus all but removing the meaning of a region in Atlasia.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Smid on September 29, 2008, 06:08:49 AM
No worries about the delay.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Brandon H on September 29, 2008, 08:35:35 AM
Mr. Brandon, might you please be able to take the time to answer these questions which I asked you more than four days ago? Much appreciated, your Lieutenant Governor, Rockefeller Republican, or presently known as "Jimmy the Flute".


Thought you were talking to me for a minute. :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on September 29, 2008, 09:10:09 AM
A few questions directed to Mr. Brandon. Why are you running for the Governorship of the Northeast? What are your opinions of the Northeast Region's inability to produce any legislation for the last two months during our monthly proposition thread, which the Northeast was once famous for? If you are elected Governor, how will you combat this?



Sorry for the delay.

First, I am running for the Governorship of the Northeast because we need to bring accountability back to Atlasia. People will be now held accountable for their inactivity and inaction. Change is needed for the Northeast, and I am the person to bring about that change. I am embarrased by the inaction of our leaders to present legislation to bring the change needed to the Northeast. Something needs to be done and done fast. I promise I will veto every pork barrel spending bill that comes across my desk. I will bring the reform that is needed. And I promise you, when I get into office, there will be many pieces of legislation that will be presented, because I will be working for the people. I will not be in the pocket of special interest groups. I represent the people of the Northeast and will work my hardest to ensure that the Northeast will get back on track. Inactive senators may be asked to take a back seat, or will be asked to resign their positions. These people were elected to change Atlasia, but Atlasia changed them. Now they must be held accountable.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: HappyWarrior on September 29, 2008, 12:00:35 PM
A few questions directed to Mr. Brandon. Why are you running for the Governorship of the Northeast? What are your opinions of the Northeast Region's inability to produce any legislation for the last two months during our monthly proposition thread, which the Northeast was once famous for? If you are elected Governor, how will you combat this?



Sorry for the delay.

First, I am running for the Governorship of the Northeast because we need to bring accountability back to Atlasia. People will be now held accountable for their inactivity and inaction. Change is needed for the Northeast, and I am the person to bring about that change. I am embarrased by the inaction of our leaders to present legislation to bring the change needed to the Northeast. Something needs to be done and done fast. I promise I will veto every pork barrel spending bill that comes across my desk. I will bring the reform that is needed. And I promise you, when I get into office, there will be many pieces of legislation that will be presented, because I will be working for the people. I will not be in the pocket of special interest groups. I represent the people of the Northeast and will work my hardest to ensure that the Northeast will get back on track. Inactive senators may be asked to take a back seat, or will be asked to resign their positions. These people were elected to change Atlasia, but Atlasia changed them. Now they must be held accountable.

???


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on September 29, 2008, 03:05:13 PM
Remember the "dead red avatars" Sam would constantly complain about before he got kicked into the Supreme Court and obscurity?

I think we have a far greater and opposite reaction. And when I say reaction, I mean it literally.

     What exactly provoked that comment, if I may inquire?

I was annoyed that day.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 29, 2008, 04:25:59 PM
Endorsement

The RPP loves activity and regional government, for that reason the party has no hesistation in supporting Torie in the Pacific senate race


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on September 29, 2008, 04:29:37 PM
A few questions directed to Mr. Brandon. Why are you running for the Governorship of the Northeast? What are your opinions of the Northeast Region's inability to produce any legislation for the last two months during our monthly proposition thread, which the Northeast was once famous for? If you are elected Governor, how will you combat this?



Sorry for the delay.

First, I am running for the Governorship of the Northeast because we need to bring accountability back to Atlasia. People will be now held accountable for their inactivity and inaction. Change is needed for the Northeast, and I am the person to bring about that change. I am embarrased by the inaction of our leaders to present legislation to bring the change needed to the Northeast. Something needs to be done and done fast. I promise I will veto every pork barrel spending bill that comes across my desk. I will bring the reform that is needed. And I promise you, when I get into office, there will be many pieces of legislation that will be presented, because I will be working for the people. I will not be in the pocket of special interest groups. I represent the people of the Northeast and will work my hardest to ensure that the Northeast will get back on track. Inactive senators may be asked to take a back seat, or will be asked to resign their positions. These people were elected to change Atlasia, but Atlasia changed them. Now they must be held accountable.

???

Yes, WTF???


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Robespierre's Jaw on September 29, 2008, 05:11:49 PM
First, I am running for the Governorship of the Northeast because we need to bring accountability back to Atlasia. People will be now held accountable for their inactivity and inaction. Change is needed for the Northeast, and I am the person to bring about that change. I am embarrassed by the inaction of our leaders to present legislation to bring the change needed to the Northeast. Something needs to be done and done fast. I promise I will veto every pork barrel spending bill that comes across my desk. I will bring the reform that is needed. And I promise you, when I get into office, there will be many pieces of legislation that will be presented, because I will be working for the people. I will not be in the pocket of special interest groups. I represent the people of the Northeast and will work my hardest to ensure that the Northeast will get back on track. Inactive senators may be asked to take a back seat, or will be asked to resign their positions. These people were elected to change Atlasia, but Atlasia changed them. Now they must be held accountable.

Firstly I appreciate your comments regarding my questions. However, I would like to point out a few flaws in your statements, particularly those regarding the Northeast, in which you are running for the office of Governor. Firsly, are you trying to suggest that every single Northeast citizen is responsible for the recent inaction plaguing our region at the present? Because, judging from your use of language it seems that very way. I admit under the leadership of Lief as Governor of the Northeast we have not acheived legislative greatness as seen under Governor's MAS and AndrewCT. However, we as citizens of the Northeast will strive for that glory once more, when the next Administration takes office this October. Also, if you are elected this October, how exactly will you improve the activity in the monthly proposition ballots?

Secondly and finally, we do not have Senators which vote upon monthly legislation. In fact every registered Northeast citizen can propose legislation in the monthly proposition ballot, and in the process can vote on the items of legislation that have made it to that particular month's ballot. Only of course after that have the signatures of three Northeast citizens.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on September 30, 2008, 12:19:45 AM
Remember the "dead red avatars" Sam would constantly complain about before he got kicked into the Supreme Court and obscurity?

I think we have a far greater and opposite reaction. And when I say reaction, I mean it literally.

     What exactly provoked that comment, if I may inquire?

I was annoyed that day.

     Eh, okay. ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on September 30, 2008, 07:41:08 AM
First, I am running for the Governorship of the Northeast because we need to bring accountability back to Atlasia. People will be now held accountable for their inactivity and inaction. Change is needed for the Northeast, and I am the person to bring about that change. I am embarrassed by the inaction of our leaders to present legislation to bring the change needed to the Northeast. Something needs to be done and done fast. I promise I will veto every pork barrel spending bill that comes across my desk. I will bring the reform that is needed. And I promise you, when I get into office, there will be many pieces of legislation that will be presented, because I will be working for the people. I will not be in the pocket of special interest groups. I represent the people of the Northeast and will work my hardest to ensure that the Northeast will get back on track. Inactive senators may be asked to take a back seat, or will be asked to resign their positions. These people were elected to change Atlasia, but Atlasia changed them. Now they must be held accountable.

Firstly I appreciate your comments regarding my questions. However, I would like to point out a few flaws in your statements, particularly those regarding the Northeast, in which you are running for the office of Governor. Firsly, are you trying to suggest that every single Northeast citizen is responsible for the recent inaction plaguing our region at the present? Because, judging from your use of language it seems that very way. I admit under the leadership of Lief as Governor of the Northeast we have not acheived legislative greatness as seen under Governor's MAS and AndrewCT. However, we as citizens of the Northeast will strive for that glory once more, when the next Administration takes office this October. Also, if you are elected this October, how exactly will you improve the activity in the monthly proposition ballots?

Secondly and finally, we do not have Senators which vote upon monthly legislation. In fact every registered Northeast citizen can propose legislation in the monthly proposition ballot, and in the process can vote on the items of legislation that have made it to that particular month's ballot. Only of course after that have the signatures of three Northeast citizens.

Well, there should be Senators which vote upon legislation. I would change it, I would make 2 elected Senators from the Northeast who would report back to the Governor on any proposed legislation. If it passes the initial vote from the Governor, 2 senators, and LT Governor, then it will be presented to the Northeastern people for a full vote. That is what I propose to do, to get the Northeast back on track.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Robespierre's Jaw on September 30, 2008, 05:08:21 PM
Well, there should be Senators which vote upon legislation. I would change it, I would make 2 elected Senators from the Northeast who would report back to the Governor on any proposed legislation. If it passes the initial vote from the Governor, 2 senators, and LT Governor, then it will be presented to the Northeastern people for a full vote. That is what I propose to do, to get the Northeast back on track.

Although I appreciate your comments Mr. Brandon, I'm curious as to why the Northeast should have only two Senators in your proposed Northeast legislative assembly. Surely if such a plan was to be undertaken if you were to be elected Governor this October, the Northeast should have more Senators in our legislative assembly, as we are the most populated region in the entire nation. Thus, I doubt that one Senator per every fourteen constituents would do the proposed Northeast legislative assembly justice.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 30, 2008, 05:29:44 PM
The RPP endorses Lt. Gov. Rocky in his reelection bid


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on September 30, 2008, 06:11:19 PM
Rockefeller Republican isn't Lt. Governor of anything.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 30, 2008, 06:12:30 PM
Rockefeller Republican isn't Lt. Governor of anything.
Wrong again Frenchie treasonist


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on September 30, 2008, 06:13:56 PM
Rockefeller Republican isn't Lt. Governor of anything.

     WTF? Do you mean that he was lying? :'( :P


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 30, 2008, 07:56:50 PM
LOL, just happened to click on the first page and saw this


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on September 30, 2008, 08:11:18 PM
Rockefeller Republican isn't Lt. Governor of anything.

Actually, he was appointed by Lief.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Smid on September 30, 2008, 09:41:28 PM

He's running for election for the position he already holds and I will be supporting him. Conor, you have my whole hearted support!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Robespierre's Jaw on September 30, 2008, 09:49:52 PM

Indeed I was, back in September to be precise, or so I think ??? I appreciate the endorsement of the RPP and those of Smid, etc. Thank you very much (in an Elvis Presley tone). I bid all the candidates Good and Good Luck this October!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on September 30, 2008, 10:29:57 PM
     It's not a problem. :) I find it funny though that Hashemite said you weren't Lt. Governor.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on September 30, 2008, 11:06:29 PM
     It's not a problem. :) I find it funny though that Hashemite said you weren't Lt. Governor.

The appointment wasn't filled with fanfare. It's not surprising he missed it.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 01, 2008, 11:45:02 PM
     The map through Dabeav.

(
)

     In total, we have 7 members in the Southeast, 4 in the Mideast, 3 in the Northeast, 2 in the Midwest, & 1 in the Pacific. I'd like to take this moment to notice that MasterJedi has logged on for the first time in three weeks. :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rules for me, but not for thee on October 01, 2008, 11:49:12 PM
What's that map represent exactly?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 02, 2008, 12:00:13 AM
What's that map represent exactly?

States with party members (yellow). Ripoff of my idea.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 02, 2008, 12:01:21 AM
     Your idea was so great that I had to "borrow" it. :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 02, 2008, 02:33:05 PM
What do the different shades mean? Regions?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 02, 2008, 02:52:12 PM

Yes.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 06, 2008, 12:32:46 AM
     The map through Generic:

(
)

     In total, we have 7 members in the Southeast, 4 in the Mideast, 4 in the Northeast, 2 in the Midwest, & 1 in the Pacific. The party continues to grow in the Northeast of Atlasia. :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 06, 2008, 01:40:47 AM
I want to propose we vote to change the official flag of the Dirty South to something else to signify the rebirth of the region. I was looking through the SoFA today and our flag looked dreadful.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 06, 2008, 01:49:12 AM
     Should it contain dark khaki as one of its colors? :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 06, 2008, 01:51:50 AM
     Should it contain dark khaki as one of its colors? :P

No. Why? I'm thinking more along the lines of the South Carolina flag with the Palmetto tree and the crescent moon.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 06, 2008, 02:01:33 AM
     Should it contain dark khaki as one of its colors? :P

No. Why? I'm thinking more along the lines of the South Carolina flag with the Palmetto tree and the crescent moon.

that sounds nice.

     I agree. Maybe we should move the regional capital to Charleston.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 06, 2008, 02:03:46 AM
I'll add those initiatives to the October ballot. I think we need to move the capitol to Charleston as well. Is Memphis our current one? If so, we definitely need to move to the coast.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 06, 2008, 02:08:39 AM
     Yep, it's Memphis.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 06, 2008, 02:13:59 AM
Dirty South Flag Act  of 2008

1. Effective immediately following the passage of this law by vote of the region's citizens, the flag of the Dirty South will change from the current uninspiring generic flag to a design consisting on a navy background with the Palmetto tree and crescent moon in the center.


Dirty South Capitol Relocation Act

1. Effective immediately following the passage of this law by the votes of the region's citizens, the capitol city of the Dirty South will be relocated from Memphis, Tennessee to Charleston, South Carolina.


I'll add these for the vote. I think it would be a good move long term for the region and continue to set us apart from the others. Our current image really doesn't match what we're doing here. I want us to be on top of everything.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 06, 2008, 02:19:00 PM
I support the measure both personally and the party supports them as well.  The convention will occur soon, most likely next week with a location to pick at a later date.  18 members strong and growing.  We also would like to extend an invitation for Gov. Jesus to address our convention to accept our nomination if he so chooses.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 06, 2008, 02:53:20 PM
At least change it slightly from the flag of SC.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 06, 2008, 03:44:25 PM

We can discuss that at the convention and make changes. I think the Palmetto tree and crescent moon need to be the centerpiece. The background color is up for debate if we so chose.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Bacon King on October 06, 2008, 04:18:03 PM
Why is regional government stuff being conducted in the RPP thread?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 06, 2008, 06:15:07 PM
Why is regional government stuff being conducted in the RPP thread?
Its not really regional government business, we are discussing where the party stands on regional issues.  We are the major party in the region and care deeply about the Dirty South


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 06, 2008, 06:29:22 PM
Why is regional government stuff being conducted in the RPP thread?

Honestly, I just didn't know where else to mention this. I didn't think that it warranted a new thread.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 06, 2008, 06:34:44 PM
October Endorsement List (just as a friendly reminder):

President
Gov. Jesus (JCP-WA)/Sen. Meeker (RPP-MD)

Senate:
Northeast: AndrewCT (NLC-CT)
Mideast: Meeker (RPP-MD)
Southeast: PiT (RPP-LA)
Midwest: dead0man (RPP-NE)
Pacific: Torie (I-CA)

October Regionals:
Northeast: RowanBrandon (RPP-NJ)/RockefellerRepublican (NLC-ME)
Southeast: Gov. Duke (RPP-SC)/Daniel Adams (RPP-FL)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Bacon King on October 06, 2008, 06:35:38 PM
Why is regional government stuff being conducted in the RPP thread?

Honestly, I just didn't know where else to mention this. I didn't think that it warranted a new thread.

Historically we've always had initiative proposal threads each month to propose/debate initiatives like those two up there. I'd like a chance to have my say without interrupting your party in here. :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 06, 2008, 06:38:31 PM
Why is regional government stuff being conducted in the RPP thread?

Honestly, I just didn't know where else to mention this. I didn't think that it warranted a new thread.

Historically we've always had initiative proposal threads each month to propose/debate initiatives like those two up there. I'd like a chance to have my say without interrupting your party in here. :)
Please feel free to interrupt this thread at anytime as Xahar made himself at home here a long time ago :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Bacon King on October 06, 2008, 06:42:21 PM
Why is regional government stuff being conducted in the RPP thread?

Honestly, I just didn't know where else to mention this. I didn't think that it warranted a new thread.

Historically we've always had initiative proposal threads each month to propose/debate initiatives like those two up there. I'd like a chance to have my say without interrupting your party in here. :)
Please feel free to interrupt this thread at anytime as Xahar made himself at home here a long time ago :)

Haha, alright. If weve got some Dirty South business in here I guess I'll just have to make myself home in here.

But about the proposals above. Personally, I'd prefer not to move the capital to Charleston. In the unfortunate event of a hurricane the regional government would be essentially decapitated. Do agree to a new flag though.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Historia Crux on October 06, 2008, 07:08:30 PM
Why is regional government stuff being conducted in the RPP thread?

Honestly, I just didn't know where else to mention this. I didn't think that it warranted a new thread.

Historically we've always had initiative proposal threads each month to propose/debate initiatives like those two up there. I'd like a chance to have my say without interrupting your party in here. :)
Please feel free to interrupt this thread at anytime as Xahar made himself at home here a long time ago :)

Haha, alright. If weve got some Dirty South business in here I guess I'll just have to make myself home in here.

But about the proposals above. Personally, I'd prefer not to move the capital to Charleston. In the unfortunate event of a hurricane the regional government would be essentially decapitated. Do agree to a new flag though.
The Hurricane issue has also been on my mind, I truly like Memphis as the capitol. It's been the capitol for quite some time, is a lovely city and it rich in history and culture. Memphis is in the middle of the region and that's where it needs to be in case of natural disaster.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Bacon King on October 06, 2008, 07:15:59 PM
I'd also like to point out that the Southeast has a billion dollar capitol complex (https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/Southeast_Capital_Initiative) in Memphis.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 06, 2008, 08:48:07 PM
Well, I'm a coastal guy myself, so I support moving the capitol to the coast. What does our budget look like, anyway? I just feel like this region has gone from being a joke to one of the most active warrants a change in the capital. Charleston has much more culture and heritage as compared to Memphis, my dear Lt. Governor! ;)


But we can debate it.

Bacon, I can start a new thread if you wish so we can debate this .. that way more members will participate.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Bacon King on October 06, 2008, 08:54:27 PM
Well, I'm a coastal guy myself, so I support moving the capitol to the coast. What does our budget look like, anyway? I just feel like this region has gone from being a joke to one of the most active warrants a change in the capital. Charleston has much more culture and heritage as compared to Memphis, my dear Lt. Governor! ;)


But we can debate it.

Bacon, I can start a new thread if you wish so we can debate this .. that way more members will participate.

Go for it. I'll save my additional comments until the new thread is up.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 06, 2008, 08:58:51 PM
Well, I'm a coastal guy myself, so I support moving the capitol to the coast. What does our budget look like, anyway? I just feel like this region has gone from being a joke to one of the most active warrants a change in the capital. Charleston has much more culture and heritage as compared to Memphis, my dear Lt. Governor! ;)


But we can debate it.

Bacon, I can start a new thread if you wish so we can debate this .. that way more members will participate.

Go for it. I'll save my additional comments until the new thread is up.

Yeah, I went ahead and made one before you even responded. That way all our citizens will be able to input their ideas.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 08, 2008, 03:52:09 PM
For any party members who weren't fully committed to Jesus (if there are any of you anymore), please take note that Moderate has spit on the RPP by appointing staunch federalist, treasonist, and Dirty South deserter Hashemite to represent our great nation to the rest of the world.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 08, 2008, 04:47:53 PM
Bgwah has my vote now. Hashimite called the government of the Dirty South incompetent, Nazi's, and dictators before leaving the region only to demand reentry during election season. To see him rewarded for that behavior by getting appointed to the President's cabinet makes me question President Moderate's judgement. I don't know if he as unaware or what, but he should've researched this sooner. 


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 08, 2008, 04:50:54 PM
Bgwah has my vote now. Hashimite called the government of the Dirty South incompetent, Nazi's, and dictators before leaving the region only to demand reentry during election season. To see him rewarded for that behavior by getting appointed to the President's cabinet makes me question President Moderate's judgement. I don't know if he as unaware or what, but he should've researched this sooner. 
No, he knows.  Read the thread, he just called an idiot for questioning his decision


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 10, 2008, 12:31:44 AM
     I updated the endorsements section of the party's wiki pages.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 13, 2008, 05:19:23 PM
The RPP strongly opposes the senate's decision to confirm Hashemite


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 13, 2008, 07:12:46 PM
Isn't tonight the beginning of our convention, DWTL? Aren't the elections next week?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 13, 2008, 07:29:56 PM
Isn't tonight the beginning of our convention, DWTL? Aren't the elections next week?
Ah, indeed I'll open a thread shortly


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 13, 2008, 07:47:06 PM
Why are we even bothering arguing with Xahar? His record speaks for itself. No need to listen to his cute little explanations for his shortcomings. We have a better party and I think it really is obvious to any reasonable person.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 13, 2008, 07:50:59 PM
Why are we even bothering arguing with Xahar? His record speaks for itself. No need to listen to his cute little explanations for his shortcomings. We have a better party and I think it really is obvious to any reasonable person.
so just ignore him. It would be funy to hear him scream and shout cause we weren't listening.
As anyone has been here awhile knows, I ignore no one


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 13, 2008, 07:52:01 PM
Why are we even bothering arguing with Xahar? His record speaks for itself. No need to listen to his cute little explanations for his shortcomings. We have a better party and I think it really is obvious to any reasonable person.
so just ignore him. It would be funy to hear him scream and shout cause we weren't listening.

Yes. Why these guys chose to engage with him is beyond me. It's the same thing every time with him making up some reason as to why he was a part of everything.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 13, 2008, 07:57:07 PM
Why are we even bothering arguing with Xahar? His record speaks for itself. No need to listen to his cute little explanations for his shortcomings. We have a better party and I think it really is obvious to any reasonable person.
so just ignore him. It would be funy to hear him scream and shout cause we weren't listening.

Yes. Why these guys chose to engage with him is beyond me. It's the same thing every time with him making up some reason as to why he was a part of everything.

kids, what are we gonna do about them?

Take away their computers. Give them some golf clubs or a basketball.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 13, 2008, 08:00:20 PM
Why are we even bothering arguing with Xahar? His record speaks for itself. No need to listen to his cute little explanations for his shortcomings. We have a better party and I think it really is obvious to any reasonable person.
so just ignore him. It would be funy to hear him scream and shout cause we weren't listening.

Yes. Why these guys chose to engage with him is beyond me. It's the same thing every time with him making up some reason as to why he was a part of everything.

kids, what are we gonna do about them?

Take away their computers. Give them some golf clubs or a basketball.

yeah then they would be healthier. We would change America if we did that. wow.

     You're officially in charge of implementing that. I expect results, mind you. *leaves*

     :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 13, 2008, 08:49:58 PM
Speaking of changing the world, anyone know where the "Search for Lost Gov. KoTBP Act" got buried?  I'd love to pass that


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 13, 2008, 08:59:47 PM
Good to see the SDP is electing Xahar chairman, they just went from irrelveant to a joke party


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 13, 2008, 09:11:26 PM
Speaking of changing the world, anyone know where the "Search for Lost Gov. KoTBP Act" got buried?  I'd love to pass that

     We should also draft the "Search for Lost Lt. Gov. SPC Act."


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 13, 2008, 11:15:03 PM
Good to see the SDP is electing Xahar chairman, they just went from irrelveant to a joke party

is he really that bad?

     Most people consider him to be quite annoying.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 13, 2008, 11:27:07 PM
Good to see the SDP is electing Xahar chairman, they just went from irrelveant to a joke party

is he really that bad?

     Most people consider him to be quite annoying.
Then why do they vote for him?

     Most, not all. You notice that he's lost multiple elections though.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 13, 2008, 11:29:42 PM
Well, kingofthebenchpress made a comeback for a few days and disappeared again. I am concerned about SPC myself. He just randomly left without warning, and he was part of the original three that brought the Dirty South back to prominence.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 13, 2008, 11:32:13 PM
Good to see the SDP is electing Xahar chairman, they just went from irrelveant to a joke party

Notice how all the people who voted for Xahar, outside of Lief, were O avatars from outside the US? What are the odds they are all Xahar's accounts?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 13, 2008, 11:33:54 PM
Good to see the SDP is electing Xahar chairman, they just went from irrelveant to a joke party

is he really that bad?

     Most people consider him to be quite annoying.
Then why do they vote for him?

     Most, not all. You notice that he's lost multiple elections though.

no he is not my focus point. How many did he loose. Is that why he is only chairman and not anything more?

     He ran for Senator of the Pacific in February & lost. He ran for Senator & Governor of the Pacific simultaneously in August & lost both of them. He might have run other times, but I know nothing of them.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MaxQue on October 13, 2008, 11:34:19 PM
Good to see the SDP is electing Xahar chairman, they just went from irrelveant to a joke party

Notice how all the people who voted for Xahar, outside of Lief, were O avatars from outside the US? What are the odds they are all Xahar's accounts?

0. That is very offensive to me, to Lewis, to Earl, to Xahar and to Al to say that. You only say that because you want to discredit them because thet are opposing you. Duke, usually, you say smarter things than that. You don't need to go at the level of DWDL.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 13, 2008, 11:36:55 PM
Good to see the SDP is electing Xahar chairman, they just went from irrelveant to a joke party

Notice how all the people who voted for Xahar, outside of Lief, were O avatars from outside the US? What are the odds they are all Xahar's accounts?

     I doubt it, unless Xahar has been posting on five different accounts, some being active from the time the site was started (at which time he would have been eight or nine years old).


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 13, 2008, 11:41:57 PM
Good to see the SDP is electing Xahar chairman, they just went from irrelveant to a joke party

Notice how all the people who voted for Xahar, outside of Lief, were O avatars from outside the US? What are the odds they are all Xahar's accounts?

0. That is very offensive to me, to Lewis, to Earl, to Xahar and to Al to say that. You only say that because you want to discredit them because thet are opposing you. Duke, usually, you say smarter things than that. You don't need to go at the level of DWDL.

Chill out. It's a joke we say about Xahar because he used another account of his to try to influence the Dirty South's elections. I know Earl and Lewis especially are not Xahar accounts. Sorry if you were offended. 


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 13, 2008, 11:48:27 PM
Lulz.

You're just bitter because you can't defeat even me in an argument.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 13, 2008, 11:56:09 PM
Lulz.

You're just bitter because you can't defeat even me in an argument.

oh get over yourself.

Oh leave The Party. ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 13, 2008, 11:57:18 PM

     Be careful. She might take you seriously. ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MaxQue on October 14, 2008, 12:07:36 AM
Good to see the SDP is electing Xahar chairman, they just went from irrelveant to a joke party

Notice how all the people who voted for Xahar, outside of Lief, were O avatars from outside the US? What are the odds they are all Xahar's accounts?

0. That is very offensive to me, to Lewis, to Earl, to Xahar and to Al to say that. You only say that because you want to discredit them because thet are opposing you. Duke, usually, you say smarter things than that. You don't need to go at the level of DWDL.

Chill out. It's a joke we say about Xahar because he used another account of his to try to influence the Dirty South's elections. I know Earl and Lewis especially are not Xahar accounts. Sorry if you were offended. 

I wasn't offended, but that is strange. That was never proven than he used a account to fraud the SE elections.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 14, 2008, 12:07:47 AM

     Was that directed to me or to Xahar? :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 14, 2008, 12:09:31 AM
Good to see the SDP is electing Xahar chairman, they just went from irrelveant to a joke party

Notice how all the people who voted for Xahar, outside of Lief, were O avatars from outside the US? What are the odds they are all Xahar's accounts?

0. That is very offensive to me, to Lewis, to Earl, to Xahar and to Al to say that. You only say that because you want to discredit them because thet are opposing you. Duke, usually, you say smarter things than that. You don't need to go at the level of DWDL.

Chill out. It's a joke we say about Xahar because he used another account of his to try to influence the Dirty South's elections. I know Earl and Lewis especially are not Xahar accounts. Sorry if you were offended. 

I wasn't offended, but that is strange. That was never proven than he used a account to fraud the SE elections.

Well yes it was. Both were posted with the same IP. Xahar claims his friend just logged on on his computer. We have no way of "proving" it. It's his word against ours. Considering that account only logged on in the past month to vote in the elections, I'm willing to bet Xahar just logged on and voted.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 14, 2008, 12:16:50 AM
Good to see the SDP is electing Xahar chairman, they just went from irrelveant to a joke party

Notice how all the people who voted for Xahar, outside of Lief, were O avatars from outside the US? What are the odds they are all Xahar's accounts?

0. That is very offensive to me, to Lewis, to Earl, to Xahar and to Al to say that. You only say that because you want to discredit them because thet are opposing you. Duke, usually, you say smarter things than that. You don't need to go at the level of DWDL.

Chill out. It's a joke we say about Xahar because he used another account of his to try to influence the Dirty South's elections. I know Earl and Lewis especially are not Xahar accounts. Sorry if you were offended. 

I wasn't offended, but that is strange. That was never proven than he used a account to fraud the SE elections.

Well yes it was. Both were posted with the same IP. Xahar claims his friend just logged on on his computer. We have no way of "proving" it. It's his word against ours. Considering that account only logged on in the past month to vote in the elections, I'm willing to bet Xahar just logged on and voted.

     Actually, C&M also logged on to register for a game on the Election & History Games board. Just letting you know so Xahar doesn't use it against you.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 14, 2008, 12:21:19 AM

He has a +8 E score.

Good to see the SDP is electing Xahar chairman, they just went from irrelveant to a joke party

Notice how all the people who voted for Xahar, outside of Lief, were O avatars from outside the US? What are the odds they are all Xahar's accounts?

0. That is very offensive to me, to Lewis, to Earl, to Xahar and to Al to say that. You only say that because you want to discredit them because thet are opposing you. Duke, usually, you say smarter things than that. You don't need to go at the level of DWDL.

Chill out. It's a joke we say about Xahar because he used another account of his to try to influence the Dirty South's elections. I know Earl and Lewis especially are not Xahar accounts. Sorry if you were offended. 

I wasn't offended, but that is strange. That was never proven than he used a account to fraud the SE elections.

Well yes it was. Both were posted with the same IP. Xahar claims his friend just logged on on his computer. We have no way of "proving" it. It's his word against ours. Considering that account only logged on in the past month to vote in the elections, I'm willing to bet Xahar just logged on and voted.

C&M has a Bellarmine (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bellarmine_College_Preparatory) e-mail address. I have on several occasions mentioned that I attend Lynbrook (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynbrook_High_School).

But I digress. Brandon knows the truth. He has the most sense of all of you. You should listen to him more often.

     Actually, C&M also logged on to register for a game on the Election & History Games board. Just letting you know so Xahar doesn't use it against you.

Yeah, City Hall is by far the part of this forum he likes the most.

Anyway, PiT, you still have time. It's not too late for the salvation.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 14, 2008, 12:25:10 AM

     I also know her in real life. I know how to talk to her better than you do.

     Actually, C&M also logged on to register for a game on the Election & History Games board. Just letting you know so Xahar doesn't use it against you.

Yeah, City Hall is by far the part of this forum he likes the most.

Anyway, PiT, you still have time. It's not too late for the salvation.

     I haven't had the time to discuss the salvation with DWTL yet. :(


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 14, 2008, 12:27:45 AM

     I also know her in real life. I know how to talk to her better than you do.

No kidding.

     Actually, C&M also logged on to register for a game on the Election & History Games board. Just letting you know so Xahar doesn't use it against you.

Yeah, City Hall is by far the part of this forum he likes the most.

Anyway, PiT, you still have time. It's not too late for the salvation.

     I haven't had the time to discuss the salvation with DWTL yet. :(

Ah. Well, get it done.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MaxQue on October 14, 2008, 12:28:56 AM
Sensei/Speed of Sound vs. Conor Flynn/Xahar

I have a vote in a thread ''Of the four preceeding Atlasians, pick the ticket that would receive your vote'' of January against Xahar.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: SPC on October 16, 2008, 06:15:06 PM
What's happened in Atlasian/Dirty Southern politics since I've been on hiatus?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on October 16, 2008, 06:16:31 PM
What's happened in Atlasian/Dirty Southern politics since I've been on hiatus?

He's back! :D


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Brandon H on October 16, 2008, 08:48:10 PM
Welcome back.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 16, 2008, 09:18:16 PM
What's happened in Atlasian/Dirty Southern politics since I've been on hiatus?

     Lots. Andy Jackson beat you, & now Daniel Adams is running against him in his bid for re-election. I'm running for Senator against Bacon King. Bgwah & Afleitch are running for president. The party now has 18 members in total. There's probably other stuff that I'm forgetting. :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: SPC on October 16, 2008, 09:42:29 PM
What's happened in Atlasian/Dirty Southern politics since I've been on hiatus?

     Lots. Andy Jackson beat you, & now Daniel Adams is running against him in his bid for re-election. I'm running for Senator against Bacon King. Bgwah & Afleitch are running for president. The party now has 18 members in total. There's probably other stuff that I'm forgetting. :P

It was quite ironic, since my own vote would have tied the election. :P Do we have our own presidential candidate? If not, then I suggest a mass NOTA protest vote.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 16, 2008, 09:46:56 PM
What's happened in Atlasian/Dirty Southern politics since I've been on hiatus?

     Lots. Andy Jackson beat you, & now Daniel Adams is running against him in his bid for re-election. I'm running for Senator against Bacon King. Bgwah & Afleitch are running for president. The party now has 18 members in total. There's probably other stuff that I'm forgetting. :P

It was quite ironic, since my own vote would have tied the election. :P Do we have our own presidential candidate? If not, then I suggest a mass NOTA protest vote.

     Meeker is running on the ticket with Bgwah. Meeker joined the party soon after we stopped threatening to secede. :P Also, you ought to re-register under our new name (the Regional Protection Party) so Earl's registry is more accurate. Not that he has updated it in a while. :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 16, 2008, 10:12:20 PM
What's happened in Atlasian/Dirty Southern politics since I've been on hiatus?

     Lots. Andy Jackson beat you, & now Daniel Adams is running against him in his bid for re-election. I'm running for Senator against Bacon King. Bgwah & Afleitch are running for president. The party now has 18 members in total. There's probably other stuff that I'm forgetting. :P

It was quite ironic, since my own vote would have tied the election. :P Do we have our own presidential candidate? If not, then I suggest a mass NOTA protest vote.

I actually made a suggestion that we run our own candidate, but the chairman of the party made the argument that we partner with bgwah and meeker this time and explore our own candidate next time. I was leaning towards pushing for someone to run on our ticket this time with Moderate not running. But we pledge to support bgwah/meeker a while back, and felt like it would look bad to backout now.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 17, 2008, 12:14:48 AM
     I sent notices to all of the party members about the elections. In the process, I came across a terrifying fact concerning PMs. If you send a PM to 10 people, it's counted as sending 10 PMs. This caused me to hit the 20 PMs per hour limit. :( Now I know better for the future.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 17, 2008, 12:16:13 AM
     I sent notices to all of the party members about the elections. In the process, I came across a terrifying fact concerning PMs. If you send a PM to 10 people, it's counted as sending 10 PMs. This caused me to hit the 20 PMs per hour limit. :( Now I know better for the future.

We may be the only people to have ever legitimately hit that limit.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 17, 2008, 12:25:24 AM
     I sent notices to all of the party members about the elections. In the process, I came across a terrifying fact concerning PMs. If you send a PM to 10 people, it's counted as sending 10 PMs. This caused me to hit the 20 PMs per hour limit. :( Now I know better for the future.

We may be the only people to have ever legitimately hit that limit.

     At least the warning doesn't reset the timer, unlike the posting within 20 seconds one. If it did, there would be a hole in my wall in the shape of a human fist.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 17, 2008, 12:26:12 AM
     I sent notices to all of the party members about the elections. In the process, I came across a terrifying fact concerning PMs. If you send a PM to 10 people, it's counted as sending 10 PMs. This caused me to hit the 20 PMs per hour limit. :( Now I know better for the future.

We may be the only people to have ever legitimately hit that limit.

     At least the warning doesn't reset the timer, unlike the posting within 20 seconds one. If it did, there would be a hole in my wall in the shape of a human fist.

I hate that the 20 seconds one does that.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 17, 2008, 12:27:56 AM
     I sent notices to all of the party members about the elections. In the process, I came across a terrifying fact concerning PMs. If you send a PM to 10 people, it's counted as sending 10 PMs. This caused me to hit the 20 PMs per hour limit. :( Now I know better for the future.

We may be the only people to have ever legitimately hit that limit.

     At least the warning doesn't reset the timer, unlike the posting within 20 seconds one. If it did, there would be a hole in my wall in the shape of a human fist.

I hate that the 20 seconds one does that.

     I do too, though it's rather bearable since it's only 20 seconds.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: specific_name on October 17, 2008, 12:56:09 AM
     I sent notices to all of the party members about the elections. In the process, I came across a terrifying fact concerning PMs. If you send a PM to 10 people, it's counted as sending 10 PMs. This caused me to hit the 20 PMs per hour limit. :( Now I know better for the future.

Perhaps we should have an email list or something, to avoid that in the future?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 17, 2008, 01:03:03 AM
     I sent notices to all of the party members about the elections. In the process, I came across a terrifying fact concerning PMs. If you send a PM to 10 people, it's counted as sending 10 PMs. This caused me to hit the 20 PMs per hour limit. :( Now I know better for the future.

Perhaps we should have an email list or something, to avoid that in the future?

     I'll just space the PMs out more in the future. It's not the end of the world if some folks get their notices a couple of hours after I start sending them out.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Brandon H on October 17, 2008, 08:58:16 AM
     I sent notices to all of the party members about the elections. In the process, I came across a terrifying fact concerning PMs. If you send a PM to 10 people, it's counted as sending 10 PMs. This caused me to hit the 20 PMs per hour limit. :( Now I know better for the future.

Perhaps we should have an email list or something, to avoid that in the future?

     I'll just space the PMs out more in the future. It's not the end of the world if some folks get their notices a couple of hours after I start sending them out.

Send it to the regional chairman and ask them to send it to the members in their region.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 17, 2008, 05:03:31 PM
     I sent notices to all of the party members about the elections. In the process, I came across a terrifying fact concerning PMs. If you send a PM to 10 people, it's counted as sending 10 PMs. This caused me to hit the 20 PMs per hour limit. :( Now I know better for the future.

Perhaps we should have an email list or something, to avoid that in the future?

     I'll just space the PMs out more in the future. It's not the end of the world if some folks get their notices a couple of hours after I start sending them out.

Send it to the regional chairman and ask them to send it to the members in their region.

     Good idea. I'll be sure to do that in the future.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 18, 2008, 03:21:00 PM
Our plans for the December election will be announced shortly after these elections


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 19, 2008, 02:55:25 PM
Ah. I think I have a pretty good idea of what's going on.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 19, 2008, 03:02:59 PM
Ah. I think I have a pretty good idea of what's going on.
With Decemeber? 

Hint: We won't be endorsing you again


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 19, 2008, 03:07:38 PM
Ah. I think I have a pretty good idea of what's going on.
With Decemeber? 

Hint: We won't be endorsing you again

Yup. But that's not what I had in mind, actually. Besides, I'll be holding another office at that point.

you endorsed him once? what happened there?

He decided he liked me in August (just as he had last December). It wasn't an endorsement per se, but almost all members gave me a second preference.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 19, 2008, 03:14:26 PM
you endorsed him once? what happened there?

He decided he liked me in August (just as he had last December). It wasn't an endorsement per se, but almost all members gave me a second preference.

     How was it not an endorsement per se?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 19, 2008, 03:20:34 PM
Ah. I think I have a pretty good idea of what's going on.
With Decemeber? 

Hint: We won't be endorsing you again

you endorsed him once? what happened there?
He was better than most other options, plus I was unaware of his puppet account that tried to sabotage Duke and he wasn't such a know-it-all smart alec


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 19, 2008, 03:25:19 PM
jeez he killed himself. do you think if he changed you would endorse him again or did you loose all respect?
I lost respect because I won't own up to having a sock puppet account.  If he said, "yea, C&M is me" that's a different story.  I'm sure we'll see C&M popping up to vote for BaconKing and Andy Jackson within the next week


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: minionofmidas on October 19, 2008, 03:26:48 PM
I can't recall seeing him since the election, so perhaps not.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 19, 2008, 03:28:09 PM
I can't recall seeing him since the election, so perhaps not.
Xahar has not reason to post as C&M except during election time


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 19, 2008, 03:30:03 PM
I can't recall seeing him since the election, so perhaps not.
Xahar has not reason to post as C&M except during election time

It's mostly because of the quietness of City Hall. Anyway, I'll be seeing C&M in about an hour.


Ah, but it wouldn't be any fun then, would it?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 19, 2008, 04:58:02 PM
right you might not even hold an office.

I'm 80% sure I will. :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 19, 2008, 05:20:19 PM
right you might not even hold an office.
That would be a good bet

His dream job apparently is SoEA, no way Pres. Jesus is giving to give him that spot or any other in the cabinet.  The SDP is not large enough to hold two at-large senate seats, so unless he tries to strong arm Al out (which wouldn't be bad really), he's not going to the senate.  And if he thinks he can win a regional Pacific seat w/Jesus in the White House, he's dreaming


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 19, 2008, 06:17:54 PM
right you might not even hold an office.
That would be a good bet

His dream job apparently is SoEA, no way Pres. Jesus is giving to give him that spot or any other in the cabinet.  The SDP is not large enough to hold two at-large senate seats, so unless he tries to strong arm Al out (which wouldn't be bad really), he's not going to the senate.  And if he thinks he can win a regional Pacific seat w/Jesus in the White House, he's dreaming

i just wonder if he will ever get it.

     I have a strong suspicion that at some point in the near future, we'll be happy to have Ronnie out there in the Pacific. :-\


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 19, 2008, 06:23:14 PM
right you might not even hold an office.
That would be a good bet

His dream job apparently is SoEA, no way Pres. Jesus is giving to give him that spot or any other in the cabinet.  The SDP is not large enough to hold two at-large senate seats, so unless he tries to strong arm Al out (which wouldn't be bad really), he's not going to the senate.  And if he thinks he can win a regional Pacific seat w/Jesus in the White House, he's dreaming

i just wonder if he will ever get it.

     I have a strong suspicion that at some point in the near future, we'll be happy to have Ronnie out there in the Pacific. :-\

why?

     Haven't you noticed that a large proportion of Pacifickers are inactive, generally speaking?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 19, 2008, 06:36:00 PM
right you might not even hold an office.
That would be a good bet

His dream job apparently is SoEA, no way Pres. Jesus is giving to give him that spot or any other in the cabinet.  The SDP is not large enough to hold two at-large senate seats, so unless he tries to strong arm Al out (which wouldn't be bad really), he's not going to the senate.  And if he thinks he can win a regional Pacific seat w/Jesus in the White House, he's dreaming

i just wonder if he will ever get it.

     I have a strong suspicion that at some point in the near future, we'll be happy to have Ronnie out there in the Pacific. :-\

why?

     Haven't you noticed that a large proportion of Pacifickers are inactive, generally speaking?

Pacificans, dammit.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 19, 2008, 07:07:58 PM
right you might not even hold an office.
That would be a good bet

His dream job apparently is SoEA, no way Pres. Jesus is giving to give him that spot or any other in the cabinet.  The SDP is not large enough to hold two at-large senate seats, so unless he tries to strong arm Al out (which wouldn't be bad really), he's not going to the senate.  And if he thinks he can win a regional Pacific seat w/Jesus in the White House, he's dreaming

i just wonder if he will ever get it.

     I have a strong suspicion that at some point in the near future, we'll be happy to have Ronnie out there in the Pacific. :-\

why?

     Haven't you noticed that a large proportion of Pacifickers are inactive, generally speaking?

Pacificans, dammit.

     How about Pacificonianites (cookie for whoever gets the reference)?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 19, 2008, 07:21:55 PM
right you might not even hold an office.
That would be a good bet

His dream job apparently is SoEA, no way Pres. Jesus is giving to give him that spot or any other in the cabinet.  The SDP is not large enough to hold two at-large senate seats, so unless he tries to strong arm Al out (which wouldn't be bad really), he's not going to the senate.  And if he thinks he can win a regional Pacific seat w/Jesus in the White House, he's dreaming

i just wonder if he will ever get it.

     I have a strong suspicion that at some point in the near future, we'll be happy to have Ronnie out there in the Pacific. :-\

why?

     Haven't you noticed that a large proportion of Pacifickers are inactive, generally speaking?

Pacificans, dammit.

     How about Pacificonianites (cookie for whoever gets the reference)?

I won't answer it then cause I am on a diet.

     Nice one! ;) Do you know what it is a reference to, though?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 19, 2008, 10:30:39 PM
And if he thinks he can win a regional Pacific seat w/Jesus in the White House, he's dreaming

Hmm?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 19, 2008, 10:34:39 PM
And if he thinks he can win a regional Pacific seat w/Jesus in the White House, he's dreaming

Hmm?

     I guess he's referring to you becoming Governor or Lt. Governor after Bgwah takes office. Also, I find it funny that it's been almost two pages since someone with the avatar of a Southern state posted.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 19, 2008, 11:10:09 PM
And if he thinks he can win a regional Pacific seat w/Jesus in the White House, he's dreaming

Hmm?

     I guess he's referring to you becoming Governor or Lt. Governor after Bgwah takes office. Also, I find it funny that it's been almost two pages since someone with the avatar of a Southern state posted.

I don't. You're (almost) all carpetbaggers.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 19, 2008, 11:13:13 PM
And if he thinks he can win a regional Pacific seat w/Jesus in the White House, he's dreaming

Hmm?

     I guess he's referring to you becoming Governor or Lt. Governor after Bgwah takes office. Also, I find it funny that it's been almost two pages since someone with the avatar of a Southern state posted.

I don't. You're (almost) all carpetbaggers.

     The Southeastern RPP is (barely) majority Southern. Interestingly, outside of the Southeast, we only have two carpetbaggers. Meeker (who has been in the Mideast for awhile it would seem) & Smid (out of necessity since Australia is not a part of Atlasia).


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 21, 2008, 04:32:11 PM
Get to the polls, no lead is safe and the travesty of BaconKing being re-elected is too much to handle


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 21, 2008, 08:19:36 PM
Do I need to vote absentee or can I wait and vote later?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Brandon H on October 21, 2008, 11:20:38 PM
Technically, Absentee voting is suppose to be only for people who will not be able to vote during the regular time, but it has turned into early voting. You can vote now or during the regular election times.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 21, 2008, 11:24:59 PM
Technically, Absentee voting is suppose to be only for people who will not be able to vote during the regular time, but it has turned into early voting. You can vote now or during the regular election times.

That's what I thought. When are the regional election supposed to begin? October is just about over.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 22, 2008, 12:30:37 AM
Technically, Absentee voting is suppose to be only for people who will not be able to vote during the regular time, but it has turned into early voting. You can vote now or during the regular election times.

That's what I thought. When are the regional election supposed to begin? October is just about over.

This weekend.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 25, 2008, 12:30:32 PM
6-2 PiT, Jesus has a commanding lead

Nice job folks, but its not over yet


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 25, 2008, 12:37:23 PM
Does The Party have anything to say about last night's events?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on October 25, 2008, 12:41:13 PM
6-2 PiT, Jesus has a commanding lead

Nice job folks, but its not over yet

We still need to turnout voters for me in the Mideast.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 25, 2008, 12:43:14 PM
6-2 PiT, Jesus has a commanding lead

Nice job folks, but its not over yet

We still need to turnout voters for me in the Mideast.

You haven't come to the realization yet that the Dear Leader doesn't support you, have you?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 25, 2008, 12:48:05 PM
Does The Party have anything to say about last night's events?
I have no idea what you are talking about


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 25, 2008, 12:48:42 PM
6-2 PiT, Jesus has a commanding lead

Nice job folks, but its not over yet

We still need to turnout voters for me in the Mideast.

You haven't come to the realization yet that the Dear Leader doesn't support you, have you?
I already stated that I support Ben, I came to the realization that it was best for the party to have someone to support regional rights for sure.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 25, 2008, 01:00:41 PM
6-2 PiT, Jesus has a commanding lead

Nice job folks, but its not over yet

We still need to turnout voters for me in the Mideast.

You haven't come to the realization yet that the Dear Leader doesn't support you, have you?
I already stated that I support Ben, I came to the realization that it was best for the party to have someone to support regional rights for sure.

HappyWarrior?

Does The Party have anything to say about last night's events?
I have no idea what you are talking about

Do I have to do it (http://brandonhendricks.com/atlasforum/index.php) again? Don't play retarded.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on October 25, 2008, 02:24:28 PM
6-2 PiT, Jesus has a commanding lead

Nice job folks, but its not over yet

We still need to turnout voters for me in the Mideast.

You haven't come to the realization yet that the Dear Leader doesn't support you, have you?
I already stated that I support Ben, I came to the realization that it was best for the party to have someone to support regional rights for sure.

That sure does sound like DWDL supporting me.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 27, 2008, 02:25:40 PM
The Regional Protection Party will be alloted is time and funds this week to Benconstine's run-off election in the Mideast


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Workers' Friend on October 27, 2008, 02:26:25 PM
I have joined the party registered in Arkansas.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 27, 2008, 02:32:49 PM
I have joined the party registered in Arkansas.
Welcome, that also makes a citizen of the Dirty South, the most thriving region of the country.  Our governor is AHDuke, our Lt. Gov. is Andy Jackson (although he is currently losing his re-election bid to Daniel Adams).  The regional senator is BaconKing, however, he was just voted out in favor of PiT who will take office on November 7th.  Any other questions feel free to ask or PM


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Workers' Friend on October 27, 2008, 02:36:46 PM
I have joined the party registered in Arkansas.
Welcome, that also makes a citizen of the Dirty South, the most thriving region of the country.  Our governor is AHDuke, our Lt. Gov. is Andy Jackson (although he is currently losing his re-election bid to Daniel Adams).  The regional senator is BaconKing, however, he was just voted out in favor of PiT who will take office on November 7th.  Any other questions feel free to ask or PM

Thanks, I am glad to be Resident here.

Yes, I plan on running for Senate when I am eligible, when will that time be?

I would've registered earlier, but I had some family issues to deal with.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 27, 2008, 02:40:00 PM
Yes, I plan on running for Senate when I am eligible, when will that time be?
The next senate elections will be held in December for national at-large seats.  The RPP will be holding a convention at a later date to discuss nominees for these seats.  I must inform that it would be quite tough to win as a newbie without party backing in one of these contests.  Regional senate elections will be held in February, but that seat is pretty much PiT's until he no longer wants it.  If you are eager for running for office, you may want to consider another region as there is a backlog of people in the Southeast holding positions.  However, we would certainly welcome you to stay as a citizen of our region at least until you get your feet wet, most people don't get elected to anything for at least a few months.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Workers' Friend on October 27, 2008, 02:41:15 PM
Yes, I plan on running for Senate when I am eligible, when will that time be?
The next senate elections will be held in December for national at-large seats.  The RPP will be holding a convention at a later date to discuss nominees for these seats.  I must inform that it would be quite tough to win as a newbie without party backing in one of these contests.  Regional senate elections will be held in February, but that seat is pretty much PiT's until he no longer wants it.  If you are eager for running for office, you may want to consider another region as there is a backlog of people in the Southeast holding positions.  However, we would certainly welcome you to stay as a citizen of our region at least until you get your feet wet, most people don't get elected to anything for at least a few months.

I see, is there a State Senate or something I can start at?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 27, 2008, 02:42:46 PM
I see, is there a State Senate or something I can start at?
Not in the Southeast, the Mideast has an assembly not sure when elections are though. 


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Workers' Friend on October 27, 2008, 02:44:42 PM
I see, is there a State Senate or something I can start at?
Not in the Southeast, the Mideast has an assembly not sure when elections are though. 

Ah well, I'll endorse and vote (even campaign) for another candidate next Senate Elections, so I can gain experience and maybe follow in their footsteps.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 27, 2008, 02:46:39 PM
     Through Bob Dole:

(
)

     In total, we have 8 members in the Southeast, 4 in the Mideast, 4 in the Northeast, 2 in the Midwest, & 1 in the Pacific.  Every state in the Southeast has a citizen again. :D


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Workers' Friend on October 27, 2008, 02:50:45 PM
That is good.

I believe in protecting The Southeast, a region which I dearly love (born and raised in Georgia but moved to Arkansas due to military reasons), which is why I joined your party.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 28, 2008, 06:22:51 PM
4 people in the Mideast, hopefully we get them all out for Constine.  This is going to be a tough battle, I'd certainly feel more confident in it being held in the Dirty South.  While certainly not a hostile region for RPPers, its not the most friendly either.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Workers' Friend on October 28, 2008, 07:43:18 PM
4 people in the Mideast, hopefully we get them all out for Constine.  This is going to be a tough battle, I'd certainly feel more confident in it being held in the Dirty South.  While certainly not a hostile region for RPPers, its not the most friendly either.

Yes, thankfully we are very strong In Dirty South.

Just a quick question, how many members do we have versus the SD party?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 28, 2008, 07:47:49 PM
Regional Protection Party (19)
Social Democratic Party (14)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Workers' Friend on October 28, 2008, 07:51:31 PM

Ok that is good.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 29, 2008, 02:42:03 PM
The RPP endorses GMantis for SDP chair hoping that the party can regain its status as a credible party


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on October 29, 2008, 03:14:28 PM
This is the first time I see a party endorsing a candidate in another separate party's internal election.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 29, 2008, 04:30:36 PM
This is the first time I see a party endorsing a candidate in another separate party's internal election.
Its necessary in the parties opinion that we are able to keep open and honest lines of communication with all parties.  We also want the integrity of the game upheld.  That is why this was necessary.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MaxQue on October 29, 2008, 05:18:39 PM
The RPP endorses GMantis for SDP chair hoping that the party can regain its status as a credible party

The SDP endorses the closing RRP private forum.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on October 29, 2008, 05:22:10 PM
The RPP should keep its nose out of the internal affairs of another political party.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 29, 2008, 05:23:11 PM
The RPP should keep its nose out of the internal affairs of another political party.
Yeah because your chairman has done a great job of that ::)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on October 29, 2008, 05:23:56 PM
The RPP should keep its nose out of the internal affairs of another political party.
Yeah because your chairman has done a great job of that ::)

Completely irrelevent.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: dead0man on October 29, 2008, 11:04:13 PM
Good for the goose and all that.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 29, 2008, 11:16:25 PM

Hmm?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 31, 2008, 07:25:22 PM

     I don't know what he means either. :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: dead0man on November 01, 2008, 02:35:02 AM
I shortened the idium "What's good for the goose is good for the gander" (which you probably got, but just in case...) and what I meant by that was that it's kind of hypocritical to bash somebody not of your party for doing the exact same thing a member of your own party has been doing.  Everybody should keep their dogs in their own backyard.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 01, 2008, 02:43:48 AM
I shortened the idium "What's good for the goose is good for the gander" (which you probably got, but just in case...) and what I meant by that was that it's kind of hypocritical to bash somebody not of your party for doing the exact same thing a member of your own party has been doing.  Everybody should keep their dogs in their own backyard.

Isn't the point of a party endorsement to sway members of your  party in their vote?

In that case, what good is one party's endorsement in another party's election?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: dead0man on November 01, 2008, 02:52:00 AM
I'm saying you're both wrong.  We have no business in your party's internal affairs and you have no business in ours.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 01, 2008, 03:06:32 AM
I'm saying you're both wrong.  We have no business in your party's internal affairs and you have no business in ours.

I'm not trying to make any endorsements here.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: dead0man on November 01, 2008, 03:17:41 AM
()


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 01, 2008, 03:38:02 AM
I was waiting for Picard.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 01, 2008, 09:37:31 AM
The Regional Protection Party reminds voters to get out to the polls for Benconstine


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 01, 2008, 09:45:51 AM
Statement on Dirty South Elections

The Regional Protection Party would like to congradulate Gov. Duke on his re-election and Daniel Adams on his election to Lt. Gov.  We also would like to extend Andy Jackson well wishes to continue to help with the Dirty South.

We are also pleased that all but of the initiatives passed, and that we call officially call the region the Dirty South now on official statements


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Historia Crux on November 01, 2008, 11:39:54 PM
Statement on Dirty South Elections

The Regional Protection Party would like to congratulate Gov. Duke on his reelection and Daniel Adams on his election to Lt. Gov.  We also would like to extend Andy Jackson well wishes to continue to help with the Dirty South.

We are also pleased that all but of the initiatives passed, and that we call officially call the region the Dirty South now on official statements

I would like to thank this well wishes by the RPP and I offer a outstretched hand to the newly elected Lt. Governor Daniel Adams and offer my gratitude and any help that I may offer as now a former Lt. Governor and as a citizen of this great region.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: GMantis on November 18, 2008, 12:19:49 PM
What is the opinion of the RPP concerning the recent events that shooked Atlasia?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 23, 2008, 09:09:27 PM
I urge all RPP members to follow the example set by party leaders and spoil your ballots ASAP


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MaxQue on November 23, 2008, 09:11:34 PM
I thank the RRP members to prepare the removal of their voting rights.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Lief 🗽 on November 23, 2008, 09:12:13 PM
I urge all RPP members to follow the example set by party leaders and spoil your ballots ASAP
Wow, so I'm pretty sure that's illegal.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 23, 2008, 09:13:05 PM
I thank the RRP members to prepare the removal of their voting rights.
1.) We did nothing illegal, its been done plenty of times before
2.) Even if there was a case, the AG is inept at best


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on November 23, 2008, 09:13:40 PM
I thank the RRP members to prepare the removal of their voting rights.
1.) We did nothing illegal, its been done plenty of times before
2.) Even if there was a case, the AG is inept at best

Records must be kept.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on November 23, 2008, 09:13:45 PM
2.) Even if there was a case, the AG is inept at best

Yeah, but he hates us with a passion.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 23, 2008, 09:14:26 PM
2.) Even if there was a case, the AG is inept at best

Yeah, but he hates us with a passion.
Doesn't matter, he would still to prove a case that doesn't exist to the SC

Constine spoil your vote already


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on November 23, 2008, 09:16:03 PM
2.) Even if there was a case, the AG is inept at best

Yeah, but he hates us with a passion.
Doesn't matter, he would still to prove a case that doesn't exist to the SC

Constine spoil your vote already

Records must be kept.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 23, 2008, 09:17:19 PM
2.) Even if there was a case, the AG is inept at best

Yeah, but he hates us with a passion.
Doesn't matter, he would still to prove a case that doesn't exist to the SC

Constine spoil your vote already

Records must be kept.
There's no secret here, nothing illegal is being done.  Just proves that even in small numbers we can occasionally get something done


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on November 23, 2008, 09:18:40 PM
2.) Even if there was a case, the AG is inept at best

Yeah, but he hates us with a passion.
Doesn't matter, he would still to prove a case that doesn't exist to the SC

Constine spoil your vote already

Records must be kept.
There's no secret here, nothing illegal is being done.  Just proves that even in small numbers we can occasionally get something done

I dimly recall that legislation was passed making it illegal to incite people to spoilt their ballots. Maybe that was just in the Mideast region.

Records must be kept, in any event.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 23, 2008, 09:19:41 PM
I dimly recall that legislation was passed making it illegal to incite people to spoilt their ballots. Maybe that was just in the Mideast region.

Records must be kept, in any event.
Possibly, but not nationally I checked before doing this just in case.  If you want to introduce, I'll vote for it, but for now I'll do what I can legally to help out the JCP


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on November 23, 2008, 09:20:19 PM
I dimly recall that legislation was passed making it illegal to incite people to spoilt their ballots. Maybe that was just in the Mideast region.

Records must be kept, in any event.
Possibly, but not nationally I checked before doing this just in case.  If you want to introduce, I'll vote for it, but for now I'll do what I can legally to help out the JCP

Records must be kept.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 23, 2008, 09:21:01 PM


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 23, 2008, 09:21:10 PM
The Campaigning for Invalidation of Votes Act will be used here.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on November 23, 2008, 09:23:29 PM
The Campaigning for Invalidation of Votes Act will be used here.

Ah, is that it's name then. Yes, here it be;

https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/Campaigning_for_Invalidation_of_Votes_Act


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 23, 2008, 09:23:59 PM
The Campaigning for Invalidation of Votes Act will be used here.
Does not really apply here


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MaxQue on November 23, 2008, 09:25:27 PM
I dimly recall that legislation was passed making it illegal to incite people to spoilt their ballots. Maybe that was just in the Mideast region.

Records must be kept, in any event.
Possibly, but not nationally I checked before doing this just in case.  If you want to introduce, I'll vote for it, but for now I'll do what I can legally to help out the JCP

You help so the JCP. You are destroying their good reputation by association with you.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 23, 2008, 09:26:23 PM
I dimly recall that legislation was passed making it illegal to incite people to spoilt their ballots. Maybe that was just in the Mideast region.

Records must be kept, in any event.
Possibly, but not nationally I checked before doing this just in case.  If you want to introduce, I'll vote for it, but for now I'll do what I can legally to help out the JCP

You help so the JCP. You are destroying their good reputation by association with you.
Dude, this is called an online simulation.  No one is concerned about reputations.  All I'm concerned about is screwing with liberal's heads and trying to attract conservatives to the game


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 23, 2008, 09:26:51 PM
The Campaigning for Invalidation of Votes Act will be used here.
Does not really apply here

Why not?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MaxQue on November 23, 2008, 09:26:57 PM
The Campaigning for Invalidation of Votes Act will be used here.
Does not really apply here
Quote
It shall be a crime against the Republic of Atlasia for any citizen who may be called upon to make a determination as to the validity of a ballot cast in a federal election, including but not limited to the voting booth administrator, to instruct or encourage a voter who has already cast his or her ballot to take an action that would have the effect of invalidating the ballot.

I don't see why that not apply. That is very clear.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 23, 2008, 09:29:11 PM
The Campaigning for Invalidation of Votes Act will be used here.
Does not really apply here
Quote
It shall be a crime against the Republic of Atlasia for any citizen who may be called upon to make a determination as to the validity of a ballot cast in a federal election, including but not limited to the voting booth administrator, to instruct or encourage a voter who has already cast his or her ballot to take an action that would have the effect of invalidating the ballot.

I don't see why that not apply. That is very clear.
We'll see what the court thinks.  But either way it cost Lief the election.  What can happen?  I'm thrown out of office?  I'm sure SouthParkConservative would be happy to have my seat and we have the votes to get at least one senator elected.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on November 23, 2008, 09:30:06 PM
The Campaigning for Invalidation of Votes Act will be used here.
Does not really apply here
Quote
It shall be a crime against the Republic of Atlasia for any citizen who may be called upon to make a determination as to the validity of a ballot cast in a federal election, including but not limited to the voting booth administrator, to instruct or encourage a voter who has already cast his or her ballot to take an action that would have the effect of invalidating the ballot.

I don't see why that not apply. That is very clear.
We'll see what the court thinks.  But either way it cost Lief the election.  What can happen?  I'm thrown out of office?  I'm sure SouthParkConservative would be happy to have my seat and we have the votes to get at least one senator elected.

Records must be kept


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MaxQue on November 23, 2008, 09:30:17 PM
The Campaigning for Invalidation of Votes Act will be used here.
Does not really apply here
Quote
It shall be a crime against the Republic of Atlasia for any citizen who may be called upon to make a determination as to the validity of a ballot cast in a federal election, including but not limited to the voting booth administrator, to instruct or encourage a voter who has already cast his or her ballot to take an action that would have the effect of invalidating the ballot.

I don't see why that not apply. That is very clear.
We'll see what the court thinks.  But either way it cost Lief the election.  What can happen?  I'm thrown out of office?  I'm sure SouthParkConservative would be happy to have my seat and we have the votes to get at least one senator elected.

PiT just said than Lief will be the senator.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 23, 2008, 09:31:01 PM
PiT just said than Lief will be the senator.
What?  I'm talking about the next election cycle, obviously SPC isnt' winning this one, even a Canadian could figure that one out


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MaxQue on November 23, 2008, 09:32:17 PM
The Campaigning for Invalidation of Votes Act will be used here.
Does not really apply here
Quote
It shall be a crime against the Republic of Atlasia for any citizen who may be called upon to make a determination as to the validity of a ballot cast in a federal election, including but not limited to the voting booth administrator, to instruct or encourage a voter who has already cast his or her ballot to take an action that would have the effect of invalidating the ballot.

I don't see why that not apply. That is very clear.
We'll see what the court thinks.  But either way it cost Lief the election.  What can happen?  I'm thrown out of office?  I'm sure SouthParkConservative would be happy to have my seat and we have the votes to get at least one senator elected.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 23, 2008, 09:33:50 PM
The Campaigning for Invalidation of Votes Act will be used here.
Does not really apply here
Quote
It shall be a crime against the Republic of Atlasia for any citizen who may be called upon to make a determination as to the validity of a ballot cast in a federal election, including but not limited to the voting booth administrator, to instruct or encourage a voter who has already cast his or her ballot to take an action that would have the effect of invalidating the ballot.

I don't see why that not apply. That is very clear.
We'll see what the court thinks.  But either way it cost Lief the election.  What can happen?  I'm thrown out of office?  I'm sure SouthParkConservative would be happy to have my seat and we have the votes to get at least one senator elected.
Yeah, it cost hiim this election.  And if I got convicted of this crime that's been dreamed up, SPC can take my seat in December.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MaxQue on November 23, 2008, 09:34:31 PM
The Campaigning for Invalidation of Votes Act will be used here.
Does not really apply here
Quote
It shall be a crime against the Republic of Atlasia for any citizen who may be called upon to make a determination as to the validity of a ballot cast in a federal election, including but not limited to the voting booth administrator, to instruct or encourage a voter who has already cast his or her ballot to take an action that would have the effect of invalidating the ballot.

I don't see why that not apply. That is very clear.
We'll see what the court thinks.  But either way it cost Lief the election.  What can happen?  I'm thrown out of office?  I'm sure SouthParkConservative would be happy to have my seat and we have the votes to get at least one senator elected.
Yeah, it cost hiim this election.  And if I got convicted of this crime that's been dreamed up, SPC can take my seat in December.

He also did this crime, problem.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 23, 2008, 09:35:10 PM
Actually he did nothing except invalidate his own vote which by no stretch of any imagination is a crime


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 23, 2008, 10:01:24 PM
Kick me out of office, I mean there's already such great balance and debate in the senate, let's make the precedings even more interesting


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MaxQue on November 23, 2008, 10:05:42 PM
Kick me out of office, I mean there's already such great balance and debate in the senate, let's make the precedings even more interesting

I have nothing against Conservatives. I would have been open to vote for you, if you have respected your opponents, if you weren't doing all for winning and doing ethical things.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 23, 2008, 10:07:43 PM
Kick me out of office, I mean there's already such great balance and debate in the senate, let's make the precedings even more interesting

I have nothing against Conservatives. I would have been open to vote for you, if you have respected your opponents, if you weren't doing all for winning and doing ethical things.
Yeah that being all for ethical things is a huge road block for anyone ::P  And let's not kick ourselves you wouldn't vote for a conservative, your party has none.  I on the other hand orchestrated the alliance to put one of the staunchest liberals in the White House


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MaxQue on November 23, 2008, 10:10:05 PM
Kick me out of office, I mean there's already such great balance and debate in the senate, let's make the precedings even more interesting

I have nothing against Conservatives. I would have been open to vote for you, if you have respected your opponents, if you weren't doing all for winning and doing ethical things.
Yeah that being all for ethical things is a huge road block for anyone ::P  And let's not kick ourselves you wouldn't vote for a conservative, your party has none.  I on the other hand orchestrated the alliance to put one of the staunchest liberals in the White House

I don't see that a conservative would find in SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC party. I add than Lief had support from Keystone Phil, former President of Atlasia, and of Mike Naso, who are two conservatives.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 23, 2008, 10:10:41 PM
I don't see that a conservative would find in SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC party. I add than Lief had support from Keystone Phil, former President of Atlasia, and of Mike Naso, who are two conservatives.
You do realize that Phil takes this about as seriously as I do right?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MaxQue on November 23, 2008, 10:14:48 PM
I don't see that a conservative would find in SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC party. I add than Lief had support from Keystone Phil, former President of Atlasia, and of Mike Naso, who are two conservatives.
You do realize that Phil takes this about as seriously as I do right?

Yes.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 25, 2008, 04:04:07 PM
ATTN: ALL PARTY MEMBERS

How do you feel about the secret ballot?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 25, 2008, 04:39:36 PM
Although we obviously do not have the votes now, an idea to consider in the future is for each region to decide how their senator is elected.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Lief 🗽 on November 25, 2008, 04:40:29 PM
Although we obviously do not have the votes now, an idea to consider in the future is for each region to decide how their senator is elected.
Haha, you are guys are wacky.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 25, 2008, 04:41:12 PM
Although we obviously do not have the votes now, an idea to consider in the future is for each region to decide how their senator is elected.
Haha, you are guys are wacky.
Wacky because we want to further expand regional rights?  Of course ::)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Lief 🗽 on November 25, 2008, 04:41:49 PM
Yeah, but you take it to such extremes that it becomes humorous.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 25, 2008, 04:44:50 PM
Yeah, but you take it to such extremes that it becomes humorous.
This really wouldn't be that extreme, secession is extreme.  My intention was to have at some point each region have an assembly like the Mideast that would vote in a senator, similar to the system America used prior to the 17th(?) amendment


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 25, 2008, 04:53:42 PM
Indirect election?

That's an interesting idea, though your motives are clear here.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 25, 2008, 04:57:23 PM
Indirect election?

That's an interesting idea, though your motives are clear here.
Honestly I have no motives, I'm not really sure at what you are getting at.  The RPP candidate will win the Dirty South for awhile unless there are drastic changes.  I actually want to get a DS legislature as I feel there is a lot of talented people and not enough positions.

The legislature would also be free to select a member or the Gov or Lt. Gov..


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 25, 2008, 05:07:57 PM
Indirect election?

That's an interesting idea, though your motives are clear here.
Honestly I have no motives, I'm not really sure at what you are getting at.  The RPP candidate will win the Dirty South for awhile unless there are drastic changes.  I actually want to get a DS legislature as I feel there is a lot of talented people and not enough positions.

The legislature would also be free to select a member or the Gov or Lt. Gov..

A Tennessee-style system where the legislature elects the Lt. Gov. would be interesting.

But the real question here is what "posters" today are ericadlers, created to undermine fantasy elections?

The RPP may want to ask itself this.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 25, 2008, 06:18:25 PM
But the real question here is what "posters" today are ericadlers, created to undermine fantasy elections?

The RPP may want to ask itself this.
We know which poster you tried to be to gain access to the forum.  I'm pretty sure the two (hoping to expand to three) people I have in mind are not you


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Brandon H on November 25, 2008, 06:29:39 PM
Well the real-life U.S. allows the states to determine its own method of electing its own representatives and senators, as long as the actual election takes place on the Tuesday following the first Monday in November, or after.

This is another idea I had a while back. Let the governors administer the senate elections and the SoFA would just have to focus on President / Vice President.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on November 25, 2008, 06:32:29 PM
Indirect election?

That's an interesting idea, though your motives are clear here.
Honestly I have no motives, I'm not really sure at what you are getting at.  The RPP candidate will win the Dirty South for awhile unless there are drastic changes.  I actually want to get a DS legislature as I feel there is a lot of talented people and not enough positions.

The legislature would also be free to select a member or the Gov or Lt. Gov..

A Tennessee-style system where the legislature elects the Lt. Gov. would be interesting.

But the real question here is what "posters" today are ericadlers, created to undermine fantasy elections?

The RPP may want to ask itself this.

     What if we prohibited any party from holding a majority of the seats in the legislature?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 25, 2008, 06:32:37 PM
Well the real-life U.S. allows the states to determine its own method of electing its own representatives and senators, as long as the actual election takes place on the Tuesday following the first Monday in November, or after.

This is another idea I had a while back. Let the governors administer the senate elections and the SoFA would just have to focus on President / Vice President.

^^^ this. The regions need to be in charge of senate races, not the government.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 25, 2008, 06:33:08 PM
Well the real-life U.S. allows the states to determine its own method of electing its own representatives and senators, as long as the actual election takes place on the Tuesday following the first Monday in November, or after.

This is another idea I had a while back. Let the governors administer the senate elections and the SoFA would just have to focus on President / Vice President.

^^^ this. The regions need to be in charge of senate races, not the government.
I'll start drafting a bill and if it fails maybe we'll conduct our senate election however we want anyway


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 25, 2008, 06:33:20 PM
Indirect election?

That's an interesting idea, though your motives are clear here.
Honestly I have no motives, I'm not really sure at what you are getting at.  The RPP candidate will win the Dirty South for awhile unless there are drastic changes.  I actually want to get a DS legislature as I feel there is a lot of talented people and not enough positions.

The legislature would also be free to select a member or the Gov or Lt. Gov..

A Tennessee-style system where the legislature elects the Lt. Gov. would be interesting.

But the real question here is what "posters" today are ericadlers, created to undermine fantasy elections?

The RPP may want to ask itself this.

     What if we prohibited any party from holding a majority of the seats in the legislature?

Undemocratic.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 25, 2008, 06:34:35 PM
What if we prohibited any party from holding a majority of the seats in the legislature?
Nah, in a three seat legislature that would be impossible, Idk if there are three parties its pretty much the RPP and everybody else for themselves


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on November 25, 2008, 06:35:50 PM
Indirect election?

That's an interesting idea, though your motives are clear here.
Honestly I have no motives, I'm not really sure at what you are getting at.  The RPP candidate will win the Dirty South for awhile unless there are drastic changes.  I actually want to get a DS legislature as I feel there is a lot of talented people and not enough positions.

The legislature would also be free to select a member or the Gov or Lt. Gov..

A Tennessee-style system where the legislature elects the Lt. Gov. would be interesting.

But the real question here is what "posters" today are ericadlers, created to undermine fantasy elections?

The RPP may want to ask itself this.

     What if we prohibited any party from holding a majority of the seats in the legislature?

Undemocratic.

     Also unworkable since only the RPP & SDP have anything resembling a presence in the Dirty South. ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 25, 2008, 06:42:17 PM
That too.

Anyway, can you simulate an election to a hypothetical legislature? The voters would be the ones who voted (or had voted) in the recent election.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 25, 2008, 06:46:18 PM
That too.

Anyway, can you simulate an election to a hypothetical legislature? The voters would be the ones who voted (or had voted) in the recent election.
Really depends on who runs, there are plenty of indies who could win.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 25, 2008, 06:47:01 PM
That too.

Anyway, can you simulate an election to a hypothetical legislature? The voters would be the ones who voted (or had voted) in the recent election.
Really depends on who runs, there are plenty of indies who could win.

Well, we would pretend only party members run. PiT's a statistician, he can do this.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: SPC on November 25, 2008, 07:34:06 PM
Well the real-life U.S. allows the states to determine its own method of electing its own representatives and senators, as long as the actual election takes place on the Tuesday following the first Monday in November, or after.

This is another idea I had a while back. Let the governors administer the senate elections and the SoFA would just have to focus on President / Vice President.

^^^ this. The regions need to be in charge of senate races, not the government.

Thirded.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on November 25, 2008, 08:15:24 PM
Most regions couldn't run a bath, let alone an election.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 25, 2008, 08:21:49 PM
Most regions couldn't run a bath, let alone an election.
Which one are you referring to?  The Dirty South is more than capable, the Mideast seems fairly effecive as does the Pacific.  The Midwest chooses not to have elections.  The only really do nothing regoin at this point is the Northeast


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 25, 2008, 08:23:05 PM
I love how the Pacific is great and active. I'd like someone to point me to this "activity". Power was illegally transferred a few weeks ago and there's no Lieutenant Governor.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 25, 2008, 08:26:01 PM
I love how the Pacific is great and active. I'd like someone to point me to this "activity". Power was illegally transferred a few weeks ago and there's no Lieutenant Governor.
Well, they had it and I'm sure they could regain it.  Sure, no region really rivals the activity of the Dirty South but that's cause we think we're our own country :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 25, 2008, 08:28:09 PM
"Could regain it" isn't very reassuring. Why did it lose it in the first place?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 25, 2008, 08:28:42 PM
"Could regain it" isn't very reassuring. Why did it lose it in the first place?
Bgwah taking over the presidency


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on November 25, 2008, 08:29:55 PM
"Could regain it" isn't very reassuring. Why did it lose it in the first place?
Bgwah taking over the presidency

     Indeed. CultureKing hasn't been very active lately from what I've seen. Does anyone know why?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 25, 2008, 08:30:32 PM
"Could regain it" isn't very reassuring. Why did it lose it in the first place?
Bgwah taking over the presidency

No, it lost it well before that. In fact, I don't ever remember it having had it.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on November 25, 2008, 08:31:07 PM
Most regions couldn't run a bath, let alone an election.
Which one are you referring to?  The Dirty South is more than capable, the Mideast seems fairly effecive as does the Pacific.  The Midwest chooses not to have elections.  The only really do nothing regoin at this point is the Northeast

You've not been paying close (or any) attention if you think things are fine and dandy in the Mideast or if you think the region would be able to run a federal election by itself.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 25, 2008, 08:40:44 PM
You've not been paying close (or any) attention if you think things are fine and dandy in the Mideast or if you think the region would be able to run a federal election by itself.
Well that has a lot to do with every person elected to the assembly going off to bigger things after five seconds.  I think Mikado could do a fine job of running an election for what its worth


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 25, 2008, 08:43:49 PM
You've not been paying close (or any) attention if you think things are fine and dandy in the Mideast or if you think the region would be able to run a federal election by itself.
Well that has a lot to do with every person elected to the assembly going off to bigger things after five seconds.  I think Mikado could do a fine job of running an election for what its worth

He's resigning because he failed at it.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 25, 2008, 08:44:53 PM
You've not been paying close (or any) attention if you think things are fine and dandy in the Mideast or if you think the region would be able to run a federal election by itself.
Well that has a lot to do with every person elected to the assembly going off to bigger things after five seconds.  I think Mikado could do a fine job of running an election for what its worth

He's resigning because he failed at it.
Mikado resigned?  OMG what is wrong with the Mideast? LOL


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 25, 2008, 08:52:30 PM
You've not been paying close (or any) attention if you think things are fine and dandy in the Mideast or if you think the region would be able to run a federal election by itself.
Well that has a lot to do with every person elected to the assembly going off to bigger things after five seconds.  I think Mikado could do a fine job of running an election for what its worth

He's resigning because he failed at it.
Mikado resigned?  OMG what is wrong with the Mideast? LOL

Not yet.

But yes, there is something very wrong with the Mideast, and the regions in general.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 25, 2008, 08:53:13 PM
No, there is nothing wrong with the Dirty South.  And we were deeper in the sh**tter than anyone else a few months.  All you need is people who care and a little bit of controversey


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on November 26, 2008, 12:05:08 AM
You've not been paying close (or any) attention if you think things are fine and dandy in the Mideast or if you think the region would be able to run a federal election by itself.
Well that has a lot to do with every person elected to the assembly going off to bigger things after five seconds.  I think Mikado could do a fine job of running an election for what its worth

He's resigning because he failed at it.
Mikado resigned?  OMG what is wrong with the Mideast? LOL

Not yet.

But yes, there is something very wrong with the Mideast, and the regions in general.

The Constine Administration will run elections effectively, and make sure that the legislature has plenty of activity.  This time, I will not be a failure.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 26, 2008, 12:09:17 AM
Forgive me if I'm not convinced.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on November 26, 2008, 12:11:18 AM

I'm probably the only one who is convinced.  But this administration will work better than any administration in recent times.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MaxQue on November 26, 2008, 12:13:21 AM

I'm probably the only one who is convinced.  But this administration will work better than any administration in recent times.

Last time, you didn't succeed to open the voting booth in time. At least, you didn't forget.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 26, 2008, 12:13:40 AM
I say we just elect Inks Governor-for-life.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Meeker on November 26, 2008, 12:15:40 AM

At this point I would probably support that.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on November 26, 2008, 07:25:32 AM

At this point I would probably support that.

     Well yeah, that would be the sane thing to do.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on November 26, 2008, 07:31:04 AM
     Through Frihetsivrare:

(
)

     In total, we have 8 members in the Southeast, 4 in the Mideast, 3 in the Northeast, 2 in the Midwest, & 2 in the Pacific.  In other news, this is the first time there's been a non-JCPer in WA in what feels like forever.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: SPC on November 26, 2008, 12:38:05 PM

At this point I would probably support that.

     Well yeah, that would be the sane thing to do.

If you did that it would not be a democracy.

But the region would be more active.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on November 26, 2008, 12:55:16 PM

At this point I would probably support that.

     Well yeah, that would be the sane thing to do.

If you did that it would not be a democracy.

But the region would be more active.

Under my administration, the region will be active again.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Lief 🗽 on November 26, 2008, 03:47:10 PM
     Through Frihetsivrare:

(
)

     In total, we have 8 members in the Southeast, 4 in the Mideast, 3 in the Northeast, 2 in the Midwest, & 2 in the Pacific.  In other news, this is the first time there's been a non-JCPer in WA in what feels like forever.
There's an RPPer in my fair state of Vermont? :(


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on November 26, 2008, 04:10:03 PM
     Through Frihetsivrare:

(
)

     In total, we have 8 members in the Southeast, 4 in the Mideast, 3 in the Northeast, 2 in the Midwest, & 2 in the Pacific.  In other news, this is the first time there's been a non-JCPer in WA in what feels like forever.
There's an RPPer in my fair state of Vermont? :(

     Smid. He's been there for a long time.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 27, 2008, 02:50:44 PM
Damn.  All this time we've been rebuilding regions and winning elections we forgot the obvious most important thing that should consume 90% of our party discussions:

A FLAG!

But seriously we should get one, I propose the "Don't Thread on Me" thing.

Anyone wishing to object has 72 hours to do so


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: The Populist on November 27, 2008, 02:52:14 PM
Damn.  All this time we've been rebuilding regions and winning elections we forgot the obvious most important thing that should consume 90% of our party discussions:

A FLAG!

But seriously we should get one, I propose the "Don't Thread on Me" thing.

Anyone wishing to object has 72 hours to do so

Works for me.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on November 27, 2008, 03:35:46 PM
Damn.  All this time we've been rebuilding regions and winning elections we forgot the obvious most important thing that should consume 90% of our party discussions:

A FLAG!

But seriously we should get one, I propose the "Don't Thread on Me" thing.

Anyone wishing to object has 72 hours to do so

Works for me.

     Me too.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Lief 🗽 on November 27, 2008, 04:42:28 PM
     Through Frihetsivrare:

(
)

     In total, we have 8 members in the Southeast, 4 in the Mideast, 3 in the Northeast, 2 in the Midwest, & 2 in the Pacific.  In other news, this is the first time there's been a non-JCPer in WA in what feels like forever.
There's an RPPer in my fair state of Vermont? :(

     Smid. He's been there for a long time.
Huh, didn't know he was registered in Vermont. Smid's not that bad of an RPPer though, unlike some of the crazies in the Southeast (DWDL, etc.).


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Smid on November 27, 2008, 07:06:51 PM
     Through Frihetsivrare:

(
)

     In total, we have 8 members in the Southeast, 4 in the Mideast, 3 in the Northeast, 2 in the Midwest, & 2 in the Pacific.  In other news, this is the first time there's been a non-JCPer in WA in what feels like forever.

There's an RPPer in my fair state of Vermont? :(

     Smid. He's been there for a long time.
Huh, didn't know he was registered in Vermont. Smid's not that bad of an RPPer though, unlike some of the crazies in the Southeast (DWDL, etc.).

I don't know why, but I've always liked Vermont for some reason. Never been there, but it sounds like such a beautiful, tranquil place. Actually, I think I'd really like most of New England.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Lief 🗽 on November 27, 2008, 07:10:26 PM
Yeah, I've never been to Vermont either. Seems like a beautiful place to live though.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 28, 2008, 10:32:01 AM
Now taking applications for Northeast chair


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on November 28, 2008, 03:35:38 PM
      Something momentous has happened! :) With the appointment of Smid to the Northeastern Judiciary, a majority (10 out of 19 to be precise) of RPPers now hold public office!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: SPC on November 28, 2008, 07:17:17 PM
      Something momentous has happened! :) With the appointment of Smid to the Northeastern Judiciary, a majority (10 out of 19 to be precise) of RPPers now hold public office!

What? Two governors, two senators, two lt. governors, one vice-president, one judge, one assemblyman, where does the other one come in?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on November 28, 2008, 08:03:18 PM
      Something momentous has happened! :) With the appointment of Smid to the Northeastern Judiciary, a majority (10 out of 19 to be precise) of RPPers now hold public office!

What? Two governors, two senators, two lt. governors, one vice-president, one judge, one assemblyman, where does the other one come in?

     Keelhaul it all, it seems I put Ben on the list twice. :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 29, 2008, 03:12:04 PM
Once all the parties have declared their candidates, I'll set up a booth so we can make the official party ballot


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 01, 2008, 05:17:04 PM
Endorsement

The RPP endorses CultureKing in his bid for re-election as Pacific governor


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 02, 2008, 09:24:30 PM
Orders of Business

1.) Still taking applications for Northeast chairman
2.) Sometime midweek next week vote on endorsements for senate
3.) Should we ever release the bylaws or continue to drive Xahar by not?
4.) Do I need to hold any elections of some sort?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on December 02, 2008, 09:29:21 PM
     Why exactly do we need a new Northeastern chair?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 02, 2008, 09:30:12 PM
     Why exactly do we need a new Northeastern chair?
Smid resigned the position when he became CJO, conflict of interest in his opinion and I agree with him


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on December 02, 2008, 09:40:07 PM
     Why exactly do we need a new Northeastern chair?
Smid resigned the position when he became CJO, conflict of interest in his opinion and I agree with him

     Ah. Since RB has disappeared & Generic is no longer a member of the RPP, I guess Driedapples is the only option left here.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on December 02, 2008, 09:40:46 PM
     Why exactly do we need a new Northeastern chair?
Smid resigned the position when he became CJO, conflict of interest in his opinion and I agree with him

I don't see how.  I'm Governor, but I'm also Regional Chair.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on December 02, 2008, 09:43:41 PM
Just a question: What's the point?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: AndrewTX on December 02, 2008, 09:48:17 PM

I dont think that Smid would have had to resign his regional chair. Any cases that could have possibly involved him in this region (which never happen), I believe he would remain fair. If for some reason he didnt, the Governor could just dismiss him.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Brandon H on December 02, 2008, 11:49:41 PM
One could always recuse himself from the case if it is a conflict of interest.

Post the bylaws, just so the link for RPP Bylaws is blue and exists instead of being red and not existing in the wiki.

Wait until the filing deadline for endorsements, though how we vote should be obvious once the candidates list is final.

I don't think we have to hold elections for anything unless any of our chairmen vacate their seats.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Smid on December 03, 2008, 08:29:16 AM
     Why exactly do we need a new Northeastern chair?
Smid resigned the position when he became CJO, conflict of interest in his opinion and I agree with him

I don't see how.  I'm Governor, but I'm also Regional Chair.

I would note that the difference there is that the Governor is a political position, and is a party leader in a particular region. The CJO role is unpolitical and unpoliticised and I felt it best that I step aside to avoid any accusation of impropriety.

I dont think that Smid would have had to resign his regional chair. Any cases that could have possibly involved him in this region (which never happen), I believe he would remain fair. If for some reason he didnt, the Governor could just dismiss him.

It wasn't so much that I had to but rather I felt it the right thing to do. I think I could remain fair, but I think it's important to not just be fair, but to also be seen to be fair. I wouldn't think poorly of a person who didn't step aside if they were in a similar situation to me, that's just the standard to which I choose to hold myself.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 04, 2008, 04:45:16 PM
Anyone want to have a convention for December or just in February?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 04, 2008, 05:08:52 PM
I doubt we need one for just a Senate race. There isn't a Presidential race or anything going on, is there?

We can just have an election dinner or something like that where we all speak about the region. It's been a slow few months, so I doubt we have anything to talk about for a full fledged convention.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 04, 2008, 06:27:17 PM
I doubt we need one for just a Senate race. There isn't a Presidential race or anything going on, is there?

We can just have an election dinner or something like that where we all speak about the region. It's been a slow few months, so I doubt we have anything to talk about for a full fledged convention.
Good idea.  I say we hold something similar to CPAC, just a formal get together of the RPP to discuss important issues.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Smid on December 04, 2008, 07:36:41 PM
I doubt we need one for just a Senate race. There isn't a Presidential race or anything going on, is there?

We can just have an election dinner or something like that where we all speak about the region. It's been a slow few months, so I doubt we have anything to talk about for a full fledged convention.
Good idea.  I say we hold something similar to CPAC, just a formal get together of the RPP to discuss important issues.

If y'all happy to travel up to Vermont, I've got a lovely place up here and am more than happy to hire a chef to cater for a small dinner of party representatives.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 04, 2008, 08:16:56 PM
I doubt we need one for just a Senate race. There isn't a Presidential race or anything going on, is there?

We can just have an election dinner or something like that where we all speak about the region. It's been a slow few months, so I doubt we have anything to talk about for a full fledged convention.
Good idea.  I say we hold something similar to CPAC, just a formal get together of the RPP to discuss important issues.

If y'all happy to travel up to Vermont, I've got a lovely place up here and am more than happy to hire a chef to cater for a small dinner of party representatives.
And so it is done


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on December 04, 2008, 08:18:28 PM
I doubt we need one for just a Senate race. There isn't a Presidential race or anything going on, is there?

We can just have an election dinner or something like that where we all speak about the region. It's been a slow few months, so I doubt we have anything to talk about for a full fledged convention.
Good idea.  I say we hold something similar to CPAC, just a formal get together of the RPP to discuss important issues.

If y'all happy to travel up to Vermont, I've got a lovely place up here and am more than happy to hire a chef to cater for a small dinner of party representatives.
And so it is done

Let's have it in College Park, hosted at the Governor's Mansion.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on December 04, 2008, 08:19:10 PM
I doubt we need one for just a Senate race. There isn't a Presidential race or anything going on, is there?

We can just have an election dinner or something like that where we all speak about the region. It's been a slow few months, so I doubt we have anything to talk about for a full fledged convention.
Good idea.  I say we hold something similar to CPAC, just a formal get together of the RPP to discuss important issues.

If y'all happy to travel up to Vermont, I've got a lovely place up here and am more than happy to hire a chef to cater for a small dinner of party representatives.
And so it is done

Let's have it in College Park, hosted at the Governor's Mansion.

Fat chance.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 04, 2008, 08:19:27 PM
Too late, already made it in Vermont :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on December 04, 2008, 08:20:19 PM
I doubt we need one for just a Senate race. There isn't a Presidential race or anything going on, is there?

We can just have an election dinner or something like that where we all speak about the region. It's been a slow few months, so I doubt we have anything to talk about for a full fledged convention.
Good idea.  I say we hold something similar to CPAC, just a formal get together of the RPP to discuss important issues.

If y'all happy to travel up to Vermont, I've got a lovely place up here and am more than happy to hire a chef to cater for a small dinner of party representatives.
And so it is done

Let's have it in College Park, hosted at the Governor's Mansion.

Fat chance.

Really?  The Governor, Superior Court Judge, and 1 member of the Assembly are here, as well as a Founder, and the VP.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on December 04, 2008, 08:21:41 PM
I doubt we need one for just a Senate race. There isn't a Presidential race or anything going on, is there?

We can just have an election dinner or something like that where we all speak about the region. It's been a slow few months, so I doubt we have anything to talk about for a full fledged convention.
Good idea.  I say we hold something similar to CPAC, just a formal get together of the RPP to discuss important issues.

If y'all happy to travel up to Vermont, I've got a lovely place up here and am more than happy to hire a chef to cater for a small dinner of party representatives.
And so it is done

Let's have it in College Park, hosted at the Governor's Mansion.

Fat chance.

Really?  The Governor, Superior Court Judge, and 1 member of the Assembly are here, as well as a Founder, and the VP.

You're there.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 04, 2008, 08:21:54 PM
Really?  The Governor, Superior Court Judge, and 1 member of the Assembly are here, as well as a Founder, and the VP.
Smid offered first, perhaps we can hold the April CORR in College Park


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on December 04, 2008, 08:34:59 PM
Really?  The Governor, Superior Court Judge, and 1 member of the Assembly are here, as well as a Founder, and the VP.
Smid offered first, perhaps we can hold the April CORR in College Park

Perhaps; hopefully, I'll still be Governor then.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on December 04, 2008, 09:51:51 PM
Really?  The Governor, Superior Court Judge, and 1 member of the Assembly are here, as well as a Founder, and the VP.
Smid offered first, perhaps we can hold the April CORR in College Park

Perhaps; hopefully, I'll still be Governor then.

As long as you don't screw up, you will be.  :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on December 07, 2008, 11:43:16 PM
     Sorry for the false alarm earlier, but now 10/19 RPPers are employed in public office. This includes:

4/5 in the Mideast
4/7 in the Southeast
1/2 in the Midwest
1/3 in the Northeast
0/2 in the Pacific


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: SPC on December 08, 2008, 12:54:25 AM
     Sorry for the false alarm earlier, but now 10/19 RPPers are employed in public office. This includes:

4/5 in the Mideast
4/7 in the Southeast
1/2 in the Midwest
1/3 in the Northeast
0/2 in the Pacific

Who was the 10th office-holder, may I ask?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on December 08, 2008, 12:57:30 AM
     MasterJedi, appointed to the office of Mideast Superior Court Judge.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on December 09, 2008, 01:23:54 AM
     Through Gporter & KotBP:

(
)

     In total, we have 9 members in the Southeast, 5 in the Mideast, 3 in the Northeast, 2 in the Midwest, & 2 in the Pacific. We now have 21 members total, including three in TN & VA each, as well as two in LA.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: SPC on December 09, 2008, 07:32:33 PM
On the downside, their addition means that the RPP no longer holds  a majority of its party in public office.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on December 09, 2008, 07:34:41 PM
     Yeah, that occurred to me too. Of course, the more people you have the harder it is for most of them to hold public office.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on December 09, 2008, 07:35:51 PM
     Yeah, that occurred to me too. Of course, the more people you have the harder it is for most of them to hold public office.

Still, having 10 members hold office is pretty good.  Does any other Party have that many?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 09, 2008, 08:17:47 PM
     Yeah, that occurred to me too. Of course, the more people you have the harder it is for most of them to hold public office.

Still, having 10 members hold office is pretty good.  Does any other Party have that many?
The SDP runs that many candidates each time around, however, I think they have around 5 or so office holders


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on December 09, 2008, 09:29:06 PM
     Yeah, that occurred to me too. Of course, the more people you have the harder it is for most of them to hold public office.

Still, having 10 members hold office is pretty good.  Does any other Party have that many?
The SDP runs that many candidates each time around, however, I think they have around 5 or so office holders

     Which is pathetic considering that they are close to the same size & left-wing, which automatically makes them more mainstream in Atlasia.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 09, 2008, 09:32:39 PM
Which is pathetic considering that they are close to the same size & left-wing, which automatically makes them more mainstream in Atlasia.
Other than Al, Lewis, and Lief there made up mostly of Xahar sockpuppet accounts


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Lief 🗽 on December 09, 2008, 10:02:55 PM
Ah, yes, a pity we were unable to attract such successful, respected Atlasians as King of the Bench Press and gporter.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 09, 2008, 10:03:50 PM
Ah, yes, a pity we were unable to attract such successful, respected Atlasians as King of the Bench Press and gporter.
1.) They were not recruited and will not under my watch receive any RPP endorsements for office
2.) You have Xahar which is 20X worse


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MaxQue on December 09, 2008, 10:05:03 PM
Which is pathetic considering that they are close to the same size & left-wing, which automatically makes them more mainstream in Atlasia.
Other than Al, Lewis, and Lief there made up mostly of Xahar sockpuppet accounts

I didn't know than I was a Xahar sockpuppet.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Lief 🗽 on December 09, 2008, 10:10:27 PM
Ah, yes, a pity we were unable to attract such successful, respected Atlasians as King of the Bench Press and gporter.
1.) They were not recruited and will not under my watch receive any RPP endorsements for office
2.) You have Xahar which is 20X worse
Hardly. Just because you hate him doesn't mean there's anything wrong with him (and increases my opinion of him, actually), and the Presidential candidate your party endorsed thought well enough of him to appoint him to his cabinet.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 11, 2008, 05:13:24 PM
Statement on the Gporter Situation
While perennial candidate and one-time ten minute illegimate senator from the Dirty South, Garrison Porter, has joined the party, the party has no plans to endorse him or his agenda or mass genocide as advocated in a prior debate.



Statement on the Death of Fmr. Gov. KoTBP

:(


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Eraserhead on December 11, 2008, 09:45:43 PM
Just curious, how exactly was KoTBP elected?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Robespierre's Jaw on December 11, 2008, 09:53:30 PM
Just curious, how exactly was KoTBP elected?

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=77832.0

Dave was the only Southeast citizen that voted in the election and King of the Bench happened to be the only candidate running. Thus, Dave voted for King of the Bench and he was ultimately elected Governor of the Southeast. Shame he did a Harold Holt prior to swearing himself in however.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 11, 2008, 10:31:47 PM
Kingofthebench was governor before I took over. I can't believe he's died again. He wouldve made a great President.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Smid on December 11, 2008, 10:59:12 PM
Shame he did a Harold Holt prior to swearing himself in however.

What? He was picked up by a Chinese submarine?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Robespierre's Jaw on December 11, 2008, 11:09:26 PM
Shame he did a Harold Holt prior to swearing himself in however.

What? He was picked up by a Chinese submarine?

My Grandad used to tell me it was the Japanese >:(

I'm surprised that the temporary disappearance of King of the Bench until December 2008 didn't get Atlasian conspiracy theorists going. I mean there are so many possibilities, more than what those 9/11 conspiracy theorists have accumulated over the last several years, as to where the "King" went. I wouldn't be surprised if a Southern Belle took him and held him hostage for months on end, even the possibility those kids from the documentary Spellbound annoyed at his lacking ability to spell had something to do with his disappearance.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Smid on December 11, 2008, 11:45:54 PM
Shame he did a Harold Holt prior to swearing himself in however.

What? He was picked up by a Chinese submarine?

My Grandad used to tell me it was the Japanese >:(

I'm surprised that the temporary disappearance of King of the Bench until December 2008 didn't get Atlasian conspiracy theorists going. I mean there are so many possibilities, more than what those 9/11 conspiracy theorists have accumulated over the last several years, as to where the "King" went. I wouldn't be surprised if a Southern Belle took him and held him hostage for months on end, even the possibility those kids from the documentary Spellbound annoyed at his lacking ability to spell had something to do with his disappearance.

Japanese, Chinese, could have been either back then... Then again, I've read emails from a navy diver who claims he was involved in the disappearance and that Holt was murdered because he opposed American bases in Australia. I've done some googling and found his website:

http://www.harold-holt.net/

I warn you to not mess with his website, though, because it is invoked under the second law of the universe and shows CT-scan of the illicit implants in his throat, proving that the Navy used "its small but elite branch of 100 Divers for 'medical and mind drug experiments'" - apparently one of his duties was to engage "in several clandestine operations, one of which was the removal of the body of then Australian Prime Minister Harold Holt from his home out to an awaiting fishing boat the night before it was reported he disappeared while swiming." It's all online to be enjoyed.

Belle or bell? Judging from his comment the other day, he prefers the residents of church towers.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Robespierre's Jaw on December 11, 2008, 11:59:10 PM
By jove is that a hilarious website, I believe it has inspired myself to create such a website regarding King of the Bench Press! Shame I'm not all too good when it comes to creating websites though :(

Despite Gary Simmons having invoked the web site regarding the disappearance of Harold Edward Holt, 17th Prime Minister of Australia, under the Second Law of the Universe, it falls agonisingly close to Conservapedia's Page on Barack Obama (http://www.conservapedia.com/Barack_Obama). Hilarious stuff.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Smid on December 12, 2008, 12:06:22 AM
Those are pretty epic websites! I heart conspiracy theories - they make for such enjoyable reading! That's why I've always enjoyed Ludlum, the difference being, however, that Ludlum realises his writings are works of fiction.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Eraserhead on December 12, 2008, 02:06:39 AM
By jove is that a hilarious website, I believe it has inspired myself to create such a website regarding King of the Bench Press! Shame I'm not all too good when it comes to creating websites though :(

Despite Gary Simmons having invoked the web site regarding the disappearance of Harold Edward Holt, 17th Prime Minister of Australia, under the Second Law of the Universe, it falls agonisingly close to Conservapedia's Page on Barack Obama (http://www.conservapedia.com/Barack_Obama). Hilarious stuff.

Dude, you should totally do a site dedicated to the King.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 12, 2008, 06:56:18 PM
It is a little known Atlasia fact that the RPP was actually started inadvertently by DaveHawk


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on December 12, 2008, 07:00:08 PM
It is a little known Atlasia fact that the RPP was actually started inadvertently by DaveHawk

     Well if you're going to go that far back, it was also started by Dave Liep since he created Atlasia to begin with. :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 12, 2008, 10:08:36 PM
It is a little known Atlasia fact that the RPP was actually started inadvertently by DaveHawk

Let us all thank DaveHawk for his service to the Dirty South! Perhaps one day he will see the light and join our loving party.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on December 13, 2008, 11:00:52 PM
I have decided after much consideration to join the RPP.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on December 14, 2008, 01:07:34 AM
I have decided after much consideration to join the RPP.

Really...


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on December 14, 2008, 05:23:33 PM
     Through NC Yankee:

(
)

     In total, we have 10 members in the Southeast (including 9 non-banned ones :P), 5 in the Mideast, 3 in the Northeast, 2 in the Midwest, & 2 in the Pacific. We now have 22 members total. I don't think I can edit the Wiki on this computer, so I'll have to do that on Monday. ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on December 15, 2008, 11:21:50 AM

     That was uncalled for. :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on December 15, 2008, 05:20:28 PM

I don't ever recall being brainwashed. Maybe cause this is the only party in Atlasia that cares about restraining Gov't and thus fits very well with my beliefs. All power to the Regions!!!!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on December 15, 2008, 05:22:50 PM
My god. Have you any idea of that of which you speak?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on December 15, 2008, 05:39:05 PM
My god. Have you any idea of that of which you speak?

Okay I will admit the comment might have been a little extreme. But I do have some general idea of what it means. Just cause I joined Saturday doesn't mean I know nothing of the process by which the place operates. I also now the history of the RPP and how it was founded back in August as a secessionist party. I do think that the Regions can't handle everything and thats where the feds should step in but for the most part power needs to be in the hand of the regions where it is closer to the people of Atlasia. 


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on December 15, 2008, 05:46:26 PM
Unfortunately, regional power isn't closer to the people. Atlasia's actively interested in what goes on in the Senate, but the regions can easily be manipulated by a small clique (for instance, a recent vote on legislation in the Pacific had just 13% turnout). Being peope we know, Senators are easy to lobby and will often be swayed by good arguments, if you are willing to make them. As for the issues with the regions, I suggest you read this speech (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=73383.0) by Al.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on December 15, 2008, 07:04:20 PM
     I'd like to think the Southeast is rather more active than the Pacific. ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on December 15, 2008, 07:06:18 PM
     I'd like to think the Southeast is rather more active than the Pacific. ;)

You're quite wrong, though.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on December 15, 2008, 07:08:55 PM
     I'd like to think the Southeast is rather more active than the Pacific. ;)

You're quite wrong, though.

     Well there's no reason to be active at this time, though the Southeast has made an impressive comeback since earlier this year.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on December 15, 2008, 07:28:48 PM
Given the state of the Southeast back then, that doesn't imply it's very good right now.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 15, 2008, 08:09:47 PM
The RPP not only does not endorse Garrison Porter, we beg of you not to cast joke votes to encourage him either


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Brandon H on December 15, 2008, 08:10:18 PM
Xahar,
Your sig is too small. I can't see it. :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on December 15, 2008, 08:10:47 PM
Xahar,
Your sig is too small. I can't see it. :)

I'm sorry. I'll make it bigger. ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 15, 2008, 08:12:04 PM
LOL at the Pacific region not re-electing CultureKing.  Thankfully Xahar sockpuppets have at least conceded Dirty South elections.  You have an SDP candidate that would get our support you just don't turn to him


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on December 15, 2008, 08:13:43 PM
Maybe there's a reason we don't support him?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 15, 2008, 08:14:05 PM
well, i joined the SDP because they seemed more open minde then you in the RPP, SDWTL
Thank God.  I already have to shut Gporter's mouth every once in awhile


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on December 15, 2008, 09:04:01 PM
thank god i dont have anyone shutting my mouth

I think everyone on here would love to have that chance so watch what you wish for.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MaxQue on December 15, 2008, 09:29:12 PM
LOL at the Pacific region not re-electing CultureKing.  Thankfully Xahar sockpuppets have at least conceded Dirty South elections.  You have an SDP candidate that would get our support you just don't turn to him

You are stupid or what? I am not a Xahar sockpuppet.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on December 16, 2008, 11:17:03 AM

     Because he's too much of a maverick for you? :P I mean, Meeker voted for Mikado over Inks in the Mideast Gubernatorial election, but we still campaigned to get him on a ticket with Bgwah.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on December 16, 2008, 03:51:01 PM

     Because he's too much of a maverick for you? :P I mean, Meeker voted for Mikado over Inks in the Mideast Gubernatorial election, but we still campaigned to get him on a ticket with Bgwah.

Nope.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 17, 2008, 06:39:18 PM
After conferring with other members of the RPP I would like to issue the following statement.  I also want to make it clear this was not unilateral:

Statement on the Benconstine Dual Account Situation

The Regional Protection Party calls for the immediate resignation of Governor Constine.  We also are stripping of Mr. Constine of his regional chairmanship.  We refrain from comment on possible impending legal action.

On a side note, I feel incredibly betrayed by Ben.  I felt along like he was relaying (knowingly or not) information to other parties and the fact that he did not inform this was a 2nd account is disheartening.  He even took the step of asking me, as "The Populist", for information about Atlasia and which party I thought he should join.  To lie to the chairman of your party like that is inexcusable.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on December 17, 2008, 07:01:30 PM
     Oh, I get it now. Hmm, that's rather shocking, I must say. :(


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on December 17, 2008, 08:29:03 PM
It always happens when you least expect it, doesn't it. I must say I am very disapointed in Ben and I think he should be very dissapointed in himself as well.

A Question for DWTL and Sen PiT. Who will be replacing Ben as regional chairmen? I like to keep track of leadership changes and such within our party. I am guessing Inks would be a top candidate for it, if he wanted it, considering his record. We can't afford to lose ground in any region now that there is new party in the mix(The DA) and the SDP now bests us in membership. So we need someone to start cleaning up the taintedness of Mideast RPP.

Man and right before the elections too, how Mark Foleyish.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: SPC on December 17, 2008, 08:31:02 PM
If Inks doesn't want it, I'll take the regional chairmanship.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on December 17, 2008, 08:39:41 PM
If Inks doesn't want it, I'll take the regional chairmanship.

Hopefully you will be a Senator as well. :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: SPC on December 17, 2008, 10:43:09 PM
If Inks doesn't want it, I'll take the regional chairmanship.

Hopefully you will be a Senator as well. :)

I do hope so, but if I have learned anything from my past six races, it is not to be overly optimistic.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: dead0man on December 18, 2008, 12:20:10 AM
le sigh

It's much more painful when one of your own does it.  I wholeheartedly condemn what Mr Constine did.  Is creating a sock at Atlas not a bannable offense?  Shouldn't it be?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 18, 2008, 05:35:09 PM
Statement on Mideast Governor Race

The Regional Protection Party announces that following the senate elections, the focus of the party's attention will shift to the gubenatorial candidate of Fmr. Gov. Inks.  Inks has demonstrated the ability to lead the region and competently run elections.  The Mideast seems to have hit rock bottom, and we saw what happend when a rock bottom Southeast elected a new governor and became the rocking Dirty South


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 19, 2008, 07:08:28 PM
Statement on Mideast Chair

The RPP is not yet ready to name a regional chairman for the Mideast, but we would like to note that the party has a sizable prescene in the region and we will look to do something rather quickly.



Statement on Southeast Elections

The RPP, to the surprise of no one, endorses Gov. Duke and Lt. Gov. Daniel Adams for re-election to continue the dream of the Dirty South.  We also continue to wish Sen. DWTL and Fmr. Lt. Gov. SouthParkConservative the best of luck this weekend


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on December 19, 2008, 07:11:26 PM
Do you unilaterally release these all?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 19, 2008, 07:44:13 PM
No I PM certain people, who those people are is contained in the bylaws which I have no intention of letting you know, although I'm quite sure you do


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on December 19, 2008, 07:57:56 PM
No I PM certain people, who those people are is contained in the bylaws which I have no intention of letting you know, although I'm quite sure you do

So, yeah, you're unilaterally releasing them.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Lief 🗽 on December 19, 2008, 09:45:29 PM
The fact that this party is basically run in smoke-filled backrooms is disgusting.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 19, 2008, 09:47:08 PM
The fact that this party is basically run in smoke-filled backrooms is disgusting.
Any party member is welcome to have input, and most do.  Just because we don't do our bickering in public and waste forum space doesn't mean it does not occur.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on December 19, 2008, 10:34:28 PM
The fact that this party is basically run in smoke-filled backrooms is disgusting.
Any party member is welcome to have input, and most do.  Just because we don't do our bickering in public and waste forum space doesn't mean it does not occur.

Well, then, open it up. The SDP is an open party; we welcome differences in opinon. What have you got to hide?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on December 19, 2008, 11:25:14 PM
The fact that this party is basically run in smoke-filled backrooms is disgusting.

It isn't run in smoke-filled rooms.  We make decisions as a Party, and there is plenty of discussion.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on December 19, 2008, 11:27:44 PM
The fact that this party is basically run in smoke-filled backrooms is disgusting.

It isn't run in smoke-filled rooms.  We make decisions as a Party, and there is plenty of discussion.

Where? We don't see it.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on December 20, 2008, 01:11:56 AM
The fact that this party is basically run in smoke-filled backrooms is disgusting.

It isn't run in smoke-filled rooms.  We make decisions as a Party, and there is plenty of discussion.

Where? We don't see it.

Just because you don't see it doesn't mean it doesn't happen.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Lief 🗽 on December 20, 2008, 01:27:52 AM
Yes. That's what smoke-filled room decision making is all about. Never has an Atlasian party been so private, closed and secretive. Every single decision made by the SDP is discussed and voted on in public.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Lief 🗽 on December 20, 2008, 01:34:31 AM
Well, okay, never since I've been here. :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on December 20, 2008, 01:46:08 AM
The ACA had its own board back in the day.  Just saying...

But sorting topics by subject today, I found more than a page's worth beginning with "ACA". The major decisions were in public.

EDIT: Here (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?board=13.300;sort=subject), etc.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 20, 2008, 02:05:56 AM
Last time I checked, the RPP had a 41 page thread on the front page of Atlasia and has held public conventions prior to each Presidential election since it's existence. When you say all our decisions are made behind smoke and mirrors, it makes you look silly.

I also have an office with an open door for anyone to propose anything they wish to see put on the ballots. We do not have a transparency problem in the RPP or the Dirty South.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 21, 2008, 02:29:49 PM
Do we want to take a stand on secret ballots?  I personally am opposed but is there support among party members?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: SPC on December 21, 2008, 02:33:58 PM
Do we want to take a stand on secret ballots?  I personally am opposed but is there support among party members?

I oppose them on the basis that it makes the game more vulnerable to fraud and less accountable.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Brandon H on December 22, 2008, 12:24:17 AM
Congratulations to DownWithTheLeft and South Park Conservative for their election / re-election to the Senate. While we knew we were more or less guaranteed at least one seat in this election, we managed to win two. Thank you to everyone who came out and voted. To anyone who played any part in getting our members and supporters to the polls, good work on a job well done.

Also congratulations to Southeast Governor and Lt. Governor Duke and Daniel Adams on their re-election.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 24, 2008, 11:54:35 AM
Contact Your Senator...

And tell them to vote for the Gubenatorial Amendment.  Also make sure that they continue to vote down the amendment that was just voted down.  It is important that we have a Council of Governors WITHOUT destroying regional senate seats


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MaxQue on December 24, 2008, 01:36:33 PM
Contact Your Senator...

And tell them to vote for the Gubenatorial Amendment.  Also make sure that they continue to vote down the amendment that was just voted down.  It is important that we have a Council of Governors WITHOUT destroying regional senate seats

There is again restrictions?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on December 24, 2008, 02:40:43 PM
     I personally think that secret ballots should be given a chance to work. After all, if the SoFA tries to change someone's vote, the poster in question can call him out for it.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 24, 2008, 02:41:46 PM
     I personally think that secret ballots should be given a chance to work. After all, if the SoFA tries to change someone's vote, the poster in question can call him out for it.
I'm not concerned about that, I just like following the live election results


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on December 24, 2008, 02:43:27 PM
     I personally think that secret ballots should be given a chance to work. After all, if the SoFA tries to change someone's vote, the poster in question can call him out for it.
I'm not concerned about that, I just like following the live election results

     But instead, we could have exit polling. Like live election results, only they can be wrong. :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Smid on January 07, 2009, 10:21:46 AM
     Why exactly do we need a new Northeastern chair?
Smid resigned the position when he became CJO, conflict of interest in his opinion and I agree with him

     Ah. Since RB has disappeared & Generic is no longer a member of the RPP, I guess Driedapples is the only option left here.

Did Driedapples accept the position? If not, as my role is no longer apolitical, I'm happy to renominate for the position of Party Chair of the Northeast.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on January 07, 2009, 10:27:51 AM
No acceptance that I know of, Smid I waive my magic wand and make you Northeast chair again :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Smid on January 07, 2009, 11:17:32 AM
No acceptance that I know of, Smid I waive my magic wand and make you Northeast chair again :)

Thank you, kind sir.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on January 09, 2009, 08:07:47 PM
Greetings! I just registered to be in this party! So I'm here to introduce myself, and say a mighty HELLO!
:)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: SPC on January 09, 2009, 08:09:42 PM
Greetings! I just registered to be in this party! So I'm here to introduce myself, and say a mighty HELLO!
:)

Welcome to the party. :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on January 09, 2009, 08:16:07 PM
Greetings! I just registered to be in this party! So I'm here to introduce myself, and say a mighty HELLO!
:)

Welcome to the party. :)

Glad to be here! Can I ask what are platform is?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Countess Anya of the North Parish on January 09, 2009, 08:19:49 PM
Greetings! I just registered to be in this party! So I'm here to introduce myself, and say a mighty HELLO!
:)

Welcome to the party. :)

Glad to be here! Can I ask what are platform is?
They don't have one.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on January 09, 2009, 08:20:46 PM
Greetings! I just registered to be in this party! So I'm here to introduce myself, and say a mighty HELLO!
:)

Welcome to the party. :)

Glad to be here! Can I ask what are platform is?

     We oppose the expansion of the power of the federal government in relation to that of the regional governments.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on January 09, 2009, 08:23:11 PM
Greetings! I just registered to be in this party! So I'm here to introduce myself, and say a mighty HELLO!
:)

Welcome to the party. :)

Glad to be here! Can I ask what are platform is?

     We oppose the expansion of the power of the federal government in relation to that of the regional governments.

That makes very good sense.
Thanks! Now I know what I'm supporting


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on January 10, 2009, 10:23:33 AM
That makes very good sense.
Thanks! Now I know what I'm supporting
If you have any specific questions relating to the platform, feel free to ask.  Our platform is still a rough draft at this point, and therefore not fully released, but we have a good idea.

And welcome to the party :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on January 11, 2009, 09:06:03 PM
     Dug this puppy up. Through tmthforu94:

(
)

     In total, we have 8 members in the Southeast, 6 in the Mideast, 3 in the Northeast, 2 in the Midwest, & 2 in the Pacific. We now have 21 members. Interestingly, we're becoming almost as large in the Mideast as we are in the Southeast.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Smid on January 11, 2009, 09:14:49 PM
Greetings! I just registered to be in this party! So I'm here to introduce myself, and say a mighty HELLO!
:)

Welcome to our party! It's great to have you on board!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on January 11, 2009, 09:15:20 PM
Greetings! I just registered to be in this party! So I'm here to introduce myself, and say a mighty HELLO!
:)

Welcome to the Party :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on January 11, 2009, 10:06:19 PM
     I was curious, so I decided to find the average RPPer PM score by region. :)

Southeast: +5.19, -0.78
Mideast: +1.00, +2.13
Northeast: +5.81, +5.57
Pacific: +4.01, -3.29
Midwest: +5.82, -4.39

     Notes:
-The Northeastern figure is based on one reference point. To my knowledge, Diredapples & RowanBrandon have never taken the PM test.
-The Pacific figure was really easy to get. There were only two reference points, whose economic PM scores were +4.02 & +4.00.
-The Midwestern figure was a pain to get. PBrunsel, to my knowledge, has never done the PM test, so I based it off his PC score.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Smid on January 12, 2009, 03:42:16 AM
     I was curious, so I decided to find the average RPPer PM score by region. :)

Southeast: +5.19, -0.78
Mideast: +1.00, +2.13
Northeast: +5.81, +5.57
Pacific: +4.01, -3.29
Midwest: +5.82, -4.39

     Notes:
-The Northeastern figure is based on one reference point. To my knowledge, Diredapples & RowanBrandon have never taken the PM test.
-The Pacific figure was really easy to get. There were only two reference points, whose economic PM scores were +4.02 & +4.00.
-The Midwestern figure was a pain to get. PBrunsel, to my knowledge, has never done the PM test, so I based it off his PC score.

So the Northeast is the most conservative region, however we are actually predominantly a party of libertarians and moderates. Interesting, I sort of expected us to be more conservative generally.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on January 12, 2009, 06:46:42 PM
     I was curious, so I decided to find the average RPPer PM score by region. :)

Southeast: +5.19, -0.78
Mideast: +1.00, +2.13
Northeast: +5.81, +5.57
Pacific: +4.01, -3.29
Midwest: +5.82, -4.39

     Notes:
-The Northeastern figure is based on one reference point. To my knowledge, Diredapples & RowanBrandon have never taken the PM test.
-The Pacific figure was really easy to get. There were only two reference points, whose economic PM scores were +4.02 & +4.00.
-The Midwestern figure was a pain to get. PBrunsel, to my knowledge, has never done the PM test, so I based it off his PC score.

So the Northeast is the most conservative region, however we are actually predominantly a party of libertarians and moderates. Interesting, I sort of expected us to be more conservative generally.

     The Northeast is the most conservative because you're the only person there whose PM score I knew. :P

     The Mideast ends up being the most moderate because it's the only one to really represent both the left & the right of both economic & social issues.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Smid on January 12, 2009, 10:55:41 PM
The midwest seems to be the most libertarian.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on January 12, 2009, 11:02:24 PM
     Midwest is the only region where all members have PM scores in the libertarian quadrant.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: ilikeverin on January 12, 2009, 11:50:23 PM
     Midwest is the only region where all members have PM scores in the libertarian quadrant.

And yet I did not banish the RPP from the Midwest!  How tolerant of me! :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on January 12, 2009, 11:57:18 PM
     Midwest is the only region where all members have PM scores in the libertarian quadrant.

And yet I did not banish the RPP from the Midwest!  How tolerant of me! :)

     Glad to hear it. :)

     Maybe I should restart the old attempt at a recruitment drive in the Midwest, so we can crowd out the SDPers. :P I'll be sure to try to get some folks from the liberal quadrant. Don't know if I'll succeed, though.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on January 13, 2009, 04:51:56 PM
Get out there and support Inks for governor


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on January 19, 2009, 10:24:09 AM
Statement on Mideast Elections

The RPP would like to congradulate Inks on his election back to the governor's mansion of the Mideast


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Smid on January 23, 2009, 10:30:30 AM
Congratulations on your election, Governor!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on February 25, 2009, 09:07:45 AM
BUMP

The thread hasn't been posted in for awhile, mostly due to seperate threads.  Consolidation may be key.  Endorsements for constitutional delegates coming shortly


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on February 26, 2009, 06:40:10 PM
Statement on Vice-Chairman PiT

The RPP frowns upon the recent actions of Sen. PiT and are taking the following action:

1.) PiT's vice-chairmanship will be put before an entire vote of the party
2.) We will not endorse his bid for re-election


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Lief 🗽 on February 26, 2009, 06:55:00 PM
What did PiT do?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on February 26, 2009, 10:31:33 PM

     I, due to my negligence, came to be aiding Xahar in his attempt to take over Atlasia.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on February 26, 2009, 10:34:23 PM

     I, due to my negligence, came to be aiding Xahar in his attempt to take over Atlasia.

Sorry for intruding in this thread, but what'd you do that warrants such actions by your own party?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sir Coffeebeans on February 26, 2009, 10:35:07 PM
And I got the 16000th view of this thread. I would like to say that I do not condone the actions of Senator PiT. Although I do not support this party, I think it is best to let him go.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on February 26, 2009, 10:45:13 PM

     I, due to my negligence, came to be aiding Xahar in his attempt to take over Atlasia.

Sorry for intruding in this thread, but what'd you do that warrants such actions by your own party?

     Even though I didn't know it was Xahar, I was much too trusting of someone I didn't know. This resulted in the secret forum's security being breached as my account there was hacked.

     Basically, I compromised our security by associating too much with people that I didn't know well enough. I'm not too clear on much of it, since I'm not an expert on computers.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Countess Anya of the North Parish on February 26, 2009, 10:53:40 PM
And I got the 16000th view of this thread. I would like to say that I do not condone the actions of Senator PiT. Although I do not support this party, I think it is best to let him go.

SHUT IT. He is a great person no party should do that.

Mistakes happen and if you really treat him like that DWTL then it reflects bad on you and your desicions. He has helped your party in every way he can. If you go through with the choice i urge other parties to endorse PiT. He is truely what this game needs.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Lief 🗽 on February 26, 2009, 10:58:20 PM
I still have no idea what you did. Are RPP members not allowed to associate with Xahar now?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Countess Anya of the North Parish on February 26, 2009, 11:02:48 PM
I still have no idea what you did. Are RPP members not allowed to associate with Xahar now?
he talked about some stuff that was posted on the secret forum with Xahar. But PiT did not know it was Xahar.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on February 26, 2009, 11:03:41 PM
I still have no idea what you did. Are RPP members not allowed to associate with Xahar now?

I believe, from what I gathered, that PiT was the one whose account Xahar led Franzl to use to view the RPP forum. Xahar used a sock screen name to get the info from PiT somehow.

I understand how the RPP would worry about such a breach int he future, but I don't know if punishing a pretty stellar member would help in this situation. It should be taken into account that it was Xahar. The kid is evil.

Ok, enough of my input in the RPP. :-)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on February 26, 2009, 11:49:36 PM
This came down to an issue of trust and loyalty. I had a lot of respect for PiT and felt he was going to do great things in this game (and still could). However, if he is out there freely giving information to a complete stranger (assuming he didn't know it was Xahar), then that is a bit bothersome. He also never mentioned this to any of us, who were at work trying to figure out why we were still having security breaches. We simply can't have that, especially from our Vice Chair. It is very upsetting to me, but it was something we felt we had to do.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Countess Anya of the North Parish on February 26, 2009, 11:54:40 PM
This came down to an issue of trust and loyalty. I had a lot of respect for PiT and felt he was going to do great things in this game (and still could). However, if he is out there freely giving information to a complete stranger (assuming he didn't know it was Xahar), then that is a bit bothersome. He also never mentioned this to any of us, who were at work trying to figure out why we were still having security breaches. We simply can't have that, especially from our Vice Chair. It is very upsetting to me, but it was something we felt we had to do.

well I hope you decide to take him back at some point. Also if it is a bit bothersome than there is no need to act like this.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Franzl on February 27, 2009, 03:25:06 AM
I do not believe that PiT knowingly and willingly intended to harm the RPP, and I'd recommend that the RPP forgive him and keep him.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: afleitch on February 27, 2009, 07:01:12 AM
I do not believe that PiT knowingly and willingly intended to harm the RPP, and I'd recommend that the RPP forgive him and keep him.

I agree.

He is of course welcome to join the DA if he should be exprelled; we have no offsite forum to worry about and we have full confidence in the process by which we undertake decision making and policy formation.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on February 27, 2009, 08:00:45 AM
Forgive me for sticking my nose to where it may not belong, but PiT was either incredibly naive and negligent in forum security and his own personal security or he actively worked with Xahar. In either case, it's hardly worth rewarding, especially from someone as intelligent and respected as PiT.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on February 27, 2009, 12:31:34 PM
This came down to an issue of trust and loyalty. I had a lot of respect for PiT and felt he was going to do great things in this game (and still could). However, if he is out there freely giving information to a complete stranger (assuming he didn't know it was Xahar), then that is a bit bothersome. He also never mentioned this to any of us, who were at work trying to figure out why we were still having security breaches. We simply can't have that, especially from our Vice Chair. It is very upsetting to me, but it was something we felt we had to do.

well I hope you decide to take him back at some point. Also if it is a bit bothersome than there is no need to act like this.


It is bothersome that he seemed so trusting to a complete stranger to give out his login and password to it. It is bothersome that he didn't come forward and tell us this as we were trying to find out who kept breaching the forum. Instead of telling us he may have accidently given someone access, he kept silent until this whole thing blew up. We've been working with PiT since he started in Atlasia and he was our Vice Chairmen. I have no idea why he didn't come forward with us. If he had and told the truth, none of this would have happened. We could have handled it internally if it was an internal problem. He chose to keep quiet and allow this all to start by first playing dumb and then telling us Marokai should not be trusted. Smid, myself, DWTL and SPC were very disappointed by that, especially in light of what has happened.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on February 27, 2009, 05:46:10 PM
Statement from the Chair

Folks, frankly they say people mess with those in power.  When the RPP began, conservatives had no voice in Atlasia.  Myself and a few others decided we were fed of being pushed around and we took a gamble that very well may have cost of any chance of winning in this game.  However, the adverse occured.  We gave conservatives a voice, we actually gave them more than a voice.  Over the course of a few months, we have become the most powerful party in Atlasia.  While some will deny it, it really is becoming near impossible to win elections without gaining support from the RPP.  We have a strangehold on the Dirty South and hold an elected office in every region but the Pacific.

With great power comes great enemies.  This is what is threatening our party and we must resist or fall victim to what has happened to many of Atlasia's most powerful parties.  We cannot allow division, we cannot allow a collapse.  We have a moderator overstepping his bounds and threatening one of the party's founders and we have an egotistical maniac 14-year-old pulling the strings on many of Atlasia's finest.

So I call upon my party to not allow distractions to get in the way.  As SPC said on the second page of this thread when that moderator called us "jokes" and "frauds", "first they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win."  At the time it seemed to be not relevant, but at this moment it is moreso than ever.  Today I call upon the RPP to stand strong and show Atlasia what organization and ideas can bring.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Lief 🗽 on February 27, 2009, 05:55:02 PM
Well, at least you guys aren't trying to pretend you're not a conservative party anymore.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: afleitch on February 27, 2009, 06:29:06 PM
Statement from the Chair

Folks, frankly they say people mess with those in power.  When the RPP began, conservatives had no voice in Atlasia.  Myself and a few others decided we were fed of being pushed around and we took a gamble that very well may have cost of any chance of winning in this game.  However, the adverse 
occured.  We gave conservatives a voice, we actually gave them more than a voice.  Over the course of a few months, we have become the most powerful party in Atlasia.  While some will deny it, it really is becoming near impossible to win elections without gaining support from the RPP.  We have a strangehold on the Dirty South and hold an elected office in every region but the Pacific.

With great power comes great enemies.  This is what is threatening our party and we must resist or fall victim to what has happened to many of Atlasia's most powerful parties.  We cannot allow division, we cannot allow a collapse.  We have a moderator overstepping his bounds and threatening one of the party's founders and we have an egotistical maniac 14-year-old pulling the strings on many of Atlasia's finest.

So I call upon my party to not allow distractions to get in the way.  As SPC said on the second page of this thread when that moderator called us "jokes" and "frauds", "first they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win."  At the time it seemed to be not relevant, but at this moment it is moreso than ever.  Today I call upon the RPP to stand strong and show Atlasia what organization and ideas can bring.

The moderator was not overstepping the mark - you cannot make baseless accusations on this Forum as someone did, and expect us to be happy with that. And remember that this is just a game on that forum and can easily be shut down if McCarthyist nonsense takes hold. Understood?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on February 27, 2009, 06:41:16 PM
The only McCarthyist non-sense going on this forum is that questioning the motives behind the actions of some people is becoming a bannable offense. 

Please stop playing stupid.  Al continually refers to Duke as a rapist, certainly a worse claim that Duke saying Lewis may be being influenced by Xahar.  Absurdity at its finest


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: afleitch on February 27, 2009, 06:51:27 PM
The only McCarthyist non-sense going on this forum is that questioning the motives behind the actions of some people is becoming a bannable offense. 

Please stop playing stupid.  Al continually refers to Duke as a rapist, certainly a worse claim that Duke saying Lewis may be being influenced by Xahar.  Absurdity at its finest

By the tone of your last two posts I'm beginning to wonder whether you're intentionally trying to heighten the atmosphere on here.

You can't make accusations and expect to get away with it, whether or not the accused makes a formal complaint. This forum should be safe and people here should be made to feel safe. Making baseless personal accusations on the forum in my book is just as bad at attempting to hack the forums. If Duke feels Al is being unfair to him or saying things he shouldn't he should report it to the mods. These are the only people who can deal with these matters - you don't take them into your own hands.



Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Countess Anya of the North Parish on February 27, 2009, 07:19:41 PM
Statement from the Chair

Folks, frankly they say people mess with those in power.  When the RPP began, conservatives had no voice in Atlasia.  Myself and a few others decided we were fed of being pushed around and we took a gamble that very well may have cost of any chance of winning in this game.  However, the adverse occured.  We gave conservatives a voice, we actually gave them more than a voice.  Over the course of a few months, we have become the most powerful party in Atlasia.  While some will deny it, it really is becoming near impossible to win elections without gaining support from the RPP.  We have a strangehold on the Dirty South and hold an elected office in every region but the Pacific.

With great power comes great enemies.  This is what is threatening our party and we must resist or fall victim to what has happened to many of Atlasia's most powerful parties.  We cannot allow division, we cannot allow a collapse.  We have a moderator overstepping his bounds and threatening one of the party's founders and we have an egotistical maniac 14-year-old pulling the strings on many of Atlasia's finest.

So I call upon my party to not allow distractions to get in the way.  As SPC said on the second page of this thread when that moderator called us "jokes" and "frauds", "first they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win."  At the time it seemed to be not relevant, but at this moment it is moreso than ever.  Today I call upon the RPP to stand strong and show Atlasia what organization and ideas can bring.

to me it sounds like you are trying to take over the game. I also think you are trying to avoid the fact that you may be in the wrong.

Lastly I think you need to not insult others. When you can make a speech without belittling someone else just cause you don't agree with them, then you can be seen as a higher figure. But I think you need to learn to sound humble.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on February 27, 2009, 11:59:05 PM
Look, my accusations weren't very fair, but Al's conduct with me in the past has been nothing but unprofessional. Referring to me as a rapist, a fraud, or a joke is just as out of line as what I did, or worse. It also seems to go unnoticed that the reason I made the statement in the first place was because Lewis was making BASELESS claims that the RPP was somehow trying to take over the game and that I was manipulating Franzl behind the scenes. I didn't just start throwing that out.

Al threatening to ban me and telling me I committed the worst case of abuse in quite some time is simply ludicrous. We have people unfairly attacked on this forum by BRTD and the like constantly to the point where they run them away from the forum.

I have sent a complaint in to another moderator. I won't make accusations anymore, but I also expect fair treatment. If I'm going to be banned for asking Lewis if he was influenced by Xahar, then I expect a whole host of other posters to go along with me.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on February 28, 2009, 12:06:17 AM
You have my support, Duke.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on February 28, 2009, 10:52:21 AM
By the tone of your last two posts I'm beginning to wonder whether you're intentionally trying to heighten the atmosphere on here.

You can't make accusations and expect to get away with it, whether or not the accused makes a formal complaint. This forum should be safe and people here should be made to feel safe. Making baseless personal accusations on the forum in my book is just as bad at attempting to hack the forums. If Duke feels Al is being unfair to him or saying things he shouldn't he should report it to the mods. These are the only people who can deal with these matters - you don't take them into your own hands.
All I ask that if you are going to call out Duke for questioning, not stating, that someone may be involved with Xahar, it is unfair not to call out Al for blatently calliing Duke a rapist.  Especially a mod, who conceivably, should be held to a higher standard.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: afleitch on February 28, 2009, 11:01:52 AM
By the tone of your last two posts I'm beginning to wonder whether you're intentionally trying to heighten the atmosphere on here.

You can't make accusations and expect to get away with it, whether or not the accused makes a formal complaint. This forum should be safe and people here should be made to feel safe. Making baseless personal accusations on the forum in my book is just as bad at attempting to hack the forums. If Duke feels Al is being unfair to him or saying things he shouldn't he should report it to the mods. These are the only people who can deal with these matters - you don't take them into your own hands.
All I ask that if you are going to call out Duke for questioning, not stating, that someone may be involved with Xahar, it is unfair not to call out Al for blatently calliing Duke a rapist.  Especially a mod, who conceivably, should be held to a higher standard.

Actually I was calling you out as well over accusing a Bulgarian based poster of coercion :)

I am not aware of what Al has or hasn't called Duke (as I only really speak to Duke on the Atlasia forums and Al on the main forums) but if Duke finds something offensive he can report it. However don't expect anything more than a 'word in your ear' (which from what I know is all Al gave to Duke) I've reported people for using the world 'f--got' but don't expect anything more than an aside.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on February 28, 2009, 01:51:38 PM
We have a moderator overstepping his bounds and threatening one of the party's founders

Hilarious.

For the record, all I did was send Duke a sharply-worded warning (and then a further clarification) informing him of what would likely happen to him if he continued to act in a way that made a mockery of the ToS.

Quote
So I call upon my party to not allow distractions to get in the way.  As SPC said on the second page of this thread when that moderator called us "jokes" and "frauds", "first they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win."  At the time it seemed to be not relevant, but at this moment it is moreso than ever.  Today I call upon the RPP to stand strong and show Atlasia what organization and ideas can bring.

Words fail.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on February 28, 2009, 02:20:57 PM
Look, my accusations weren't very fair, but Al's conduct with me in the past has been nothing but unprofessional.

I resent the charge that I've acted in an unprofessional manner over this. I sent you a sharply-worded warning (of the sort I've sent out to other people in the past, actually) and then, when you indicated that you didn't understand why you had been warned in such a way, I sent you a message further clarifying the situation.

My personal dislike of you did not come into it at all. As you (and others) have noted, I can be very rude when I want to be. I was not rude in those warnings.

Quote
Referring to me as a rapist,

Don't think I've ever called you that. I believe the insult in question is Duke Raper of Rapington. Crude, I admit.

Quote
Al threatening to ban me and telling me I committed the worst case of abuse in quite some time is simply ludicrous. 

Don't lie.

1. I did not threaten to ban you. I merely informed you that such a thing might happen in the future unless you change(d) your behavior.

2. I did not tell you that you had committed the worst case of abuse in quite some tie. I wrote:

one of the worst cases of abusive, threatening bullying (frankly) seen on this place for quite a while (to say nothing of the poisonous subtext).

Which is quite different.

Quote
but I also expect fair treatment.

I don't think that's true. You've had fair treatment and didn't like it. You mean that you want (perhaps even expect) to be treated softly.

---

Just to make something in your (apparently) paranoid mind clear; I am not lobbying behind the scenes to have you banned. The point of the warning was to shock some sense into you as well as to make it very clear that certain sorts of behavior are just not allowed here.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: dead0man on February 28, 2009, 02:58:02 PM
Quote
Referring to me as a rapist,

Don't think I've ever called you that. I believe the insult in question is Duke Raper of Rapington. Crude, I admit.
How the hell is that not referring to him as a rapist?  Are you 7?
Quote
Quote
Al threatening to ban me and telling me I committed the worst case of abuse in quite some time is simply ludicrous. 

Don't lie.

1. I did not threaten to ban you. I merely informed you that such a thing might happen in the future unless you change(d) your behavior.
You can't see how that would be perceived as a threat?  Seriously?

Quote
2. I did not tell you that you had committed the worst case of abuse in quite some tie. I wrote:

one of the worst cases of abusive, threatening bullying (frankly) seen on this place for quite a while (to say nothing of the poisonous subtext).
How is what he did worse than what Xahar did and continues to do?  I suppose you have an out with the "one of the" phrase.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on February 28, 2009, 03:13:29 PM
As moderator, Al is extremely competent.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on February 28, 2009, 04:08:37 PM
How the hell is that not referring to him as a rapist?

Because it isn't. It's a reference to an especially disgusting example of his "humour" from a while back. That, and the fact that there used to be a Congresscritter with the middle name (I think it was the middle name, yes) "Raper" and I found out about that at the same time...

Quote
Are you 7?

I make no apologies for the quality (or otherwise) of my sense of humour.

Quote
You can't see how that would be perceived as a threat?  Seriously?

Depends.

Quote
How is what he did worse than what Xahar did and continues to do?  I suppose you have an out with the "one of the" phrase.

What Xahar was banned for was not really "abusive, threatening bullying". And I'm not suggesting that Duke has done anything to compare. Besides I'm not sure if this new tendency to appeal to the apparent inherent evil of Xahar in all things even remotely related to forum policing or this damn game is especially helpful.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Meeker on February 28, 2009, 04:19:09 PM
We're going to need a Godwin's Law for Xahar pretty soon.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on February 28, 2009, 04:32:35 PM
Anyway, there seems to be some confusion here, and I'd like to clear it up.

The warnings I sent to Duke were only incidentally related to fantasyland; if the same sort of thing had happend elsewhere (unlikely as that is) I would have reacted in the same way. It was an issue of forum administration and its only link to fantasyland politics was the fact that it related to messages posted in the fantasyland forum.

Now, you can reject that, if you like. You can assume that there's some grand and sinister plot to bring down the RPP and that my actions are the first shots from the Aurora... to which I reply with this:

()

This place here is just a game. It is not reality. Treating it as seriously as some here do is not healthy (and, yes, I know a lot here are very young and when you're that age your priorities are a little different. Not the point though). To see where that leads, I think we only have to look at a random sample of recent threads here. Or remember what Snowball Xahar actually did and why he was banned.

And, once again...

"Can't you hear yourselves, though?"


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on February 28, 2009, 08:35:24 PM
I'm not asking for soft treatment. I want fair treatment. If I am going to get a warning and a threat of bannishment, I expect others to receive the same when they attack someone or bully them. Tell me, was Ebowed reprimanded for his conduct?

You're right. If it benefits your guy, who the  cares! Let everyone and their dog vote!

If this was a Republican leaning group doing it, you'd all be claiming we were stealing yet another election.

Whoa... aren't you the guy who opposes government handouts, unless you're about to lose your trust fund?

Talk about hypocrisy.

What on earth does voter fraud have to do with the bailout? You're really grasping at straws. It's kind of sad.

Earlier in this thread, you were bitching about wealth redistribution.

Apparently the only people who don't need to take responsibility for their financial well-being are the people who are already rich.

And until you can explain this discrepancy, I won't stop bringing it up.

P.S. Dumbass rapist.

And BRTD? Why is he given immunity just because he was 41,000 posts?


You think McCain would be leading by 10 if Mitt Romney was chosen as VP? No way.

It's called a "convention bounce". Romney? Probably not. Pawlenty or anyone else without sky-high disapprovals? Probably, (though "leading by 10 is quite misleading)

Of course it's a convention bounce. Why can't the Democrats get something called a bounce?

Holy f**k is the idiot rapist saying Obama didn't get a bounce post-convention?

But Palin has energized this ticket. Pawlenty and Romney would not have come close to doing that.

So people who were going to vote for McCain anyway like her. OK.

Probably SPC's. I'm almost certain obebo is still a republican and posts to make a mockery of the far left. It's implausible that someone makes as big a shift as he made as fast as he did. It would be like me adopting former poster Bob Dole's views overnight.

It didn't happen overnight you rapist joke, there was a transition period of about 2 months or so. He was an economically right-wing Democrat for awhile.

Or maybe even yourself?

Duke is an obvious troll and an obvious fraud.

I just want fair treatment. If some members, like yourself, are allowed to run around name calling, creating threads that ridicule certain members (do you just ignore BRTD's bullying of Constine, JJ, Josh22, etc), and engaging baseless accusation, as you stated was the reason for my warning, then I shouldn't be given a serious warning for asking Lewis if he was involved with Xahar. I am positive if I mentioned Lewis's possible involvement with Xahar in every thread as BRTD does with Ben's political views or JJ's predictions or whatever, I'd be banned in a heartbeat.

Don't go whining about how I am the one wanting special treatment when certain posters on this forum are allowed to get away with just about anything. Until BRTD is banned, I think most of the forum would agree that no one else should be booted for any sort of "harassment."

Also, in response to your signature, if you can provide us with quotes where any of us use harsh character assassinations to attack members unprovoked, then I'll accept that. And please, don't tell me that episode where I foolishly had to defend myself against BRTD with the rape thing, which was a joke blown out of proportion, is justification for it to be used as an attack on me months afterwards.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on February 28, 2009, 10:21:48 PM
It's hard to believe that this thing called "Atlasia" is just a game. Really. I'm not lying. It's a game.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on March 01, 2009, 12:25:17 AM

I think he just owned you guys. You should all probably take some time to think about what you've done.

It's hard to believe that this thing called "Atlasia" is just a game. Really. I'm not lying. It's a game.

Agreed. This is a simulation game for elections. Although I guess that is why we shouldn't be surprised that we get personal attacks like this. Welcome to politics. I guess the only reason that it's (somewhat) gentler in real life is that they have to look each other in the eyes at some point, whereas online it's just a screen so "no harm done."

You all really need to chill though.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: I spent the winter writing songs about getting better on March 01, 2009, 12:41:02 AM
LOL, I love how Duke just owned himself by quoting old posts in which he claimed Palin was a genius move and apparentely a fantastic pick.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Verily on March 01, 2009, 12:45:50 AM
People commenting on the rape comments should really make themselves aware of the context in which they were made. And, really, defending your own behavior by comparing to BRTD's is rather stupid. BRTD has been banned before, recall?

That it is very difficult to get Dave to ban someone is not reason for the Moderators to not make it clear that your actions violate the ToS, which includes stating that you risk being banned. If you don't understand why your behavior was problematic, Duke, it doesn't matter what other people have done. You have a problem.

But there are plenty of other people in Atlasia with problems. One is the President, although I think his problematic behavior has taken place primarily elsewhere on the forums. This doesn't excuse anything.

Finally, Xahar-baiting is moronic. He has no influence anywhere. If he's ever unbanned he will continue to be a joke. Stop mentioning his name, period.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: I spent the winter writing songs about getting better on March 01, 2009, 02:11:40 AM
Duke is starting to remind me of some 2nd grader on the playground who keeps getting scolded by teachers and then starts crying and pointing fingers "Oh, but he did it too!". And then raving about some kid who's suspended and of no relevance to the school anymore.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Gustaf on March 01, 2009, 06:30:44 AM
Sigh. Listen to Hashemite.

Anyway, Duke. Ebowed I am fairly certain has been warned in the past. He has certainly been discussed several times. So has BRTD, of course.

As opposed to these kind of name-calling threads we moderators generally try to keep the work more or less private. If someone does something wrong the usual procedure is to PM that person a warning. The matter may be discussed among moderators. If the person in question does not make it public it won't be public. So just because there is not a public thread with a lot of people bitching about it doesn't mean that no action was taken.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: dead0man on March 01, 2009, 07:37:43 AM
Can I ask one thing?  The next time Duke needs to be "Moderated", can somebody else do it?



(and Xahar would be mentioned a lot less if he was appropriately punished for his actions)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 01, 2009, 08:40:20 AM
(and Xahar would be mentioned a lot less if he was appropriately punished for his actions)
This is key. 

Verily, how can you say Xahar will continue to be a joke when banned?  We have at least 2 people who have openly admitted they have proposed ideas on behalf of Xahar and a few more who admit contact with him.

The RPP really feels two things are necessary to keep this game civil and smooth:
1.) A full ban of Xahar
2.) Al either being held to moderator standards or unable to moderate RPP member posts


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on March 01, 2009, 09:32:10 AM
I'm not asking for soft treatment. I want fair treatment. If I am going to get a warning and a threat of bannishment, I expect others to receive the same when they attack someone or bully them.


The sort of behavior that got you the charming letter that you're very happy with is, or at least was, pretty rare here. But, from what I'm aware, when it has been drawn to our attention it has always been acted on.

Quote
Tell me, was Ebowed reprimanded for his conduct?

See what Gustaf wrote.

Quote
I just want fair treatment. If some members, like yourself, are allowed to run around name calling, creating threads that ridicule certain members (do you just ignore BRTD's bullying of Constine, JJ, Josh22, etc),

Oh for God's sake! You weren't yelled at for mockery or name calling. You were warned because you decide to engage in some pretty serious harassment; the sort of thing that can actually get you in a hell of a lot of trouble out in the real world (you know, like losing your job). I cannot believe that you don't understand this; are you so used to getting your own way that you are incapable of understanding that you crossed some pretty big red lines?

Quote
Don't go whining about how I am the one wanting special treatment when certain posters on this forum are allowed to get away with just about anything

There is only one poster on this forum who is apparently allowed to get away with "just about anything" and it is not BRTD.

Quote
the rape thing, which was a joke blown out of proportion

You aren't still trying to defend that? Hells Teeth.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on March 01, 2009, 09:37:38 AM
(and Xahar would be mentioned a lot less if he was appropriately punished for his actions)

He was banned (that it might not be a permanent ban was Dave's decision) I'm not sure what else we're supposed to do. Maybe we ought to go down to San Jose and hang the kid up from a lamp-post or something. But even if we did that, I think there would be those who'd accuse us of being soft on him.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on March 01, 2009, 09:42:43 AM
(and Xahar would be mentioned a lot less if he was appropriately punished for his actions)
This is key. 

Verily, how can you say Xahar will continue to be a joke when banned?  We have at least 2 people who have openly admitted they have proposed ideas on behalf of Xahar and a few more who admit contact with him.

The RPP really feels two things are necessary to keep this game civil and smooth:
1.) A full ban of Xahar
2.) Al either being held to moderator standards or unable to moderate RPP member posts

Little boy, you aren't in a position to negotiate for anything (and especially not something so unhinged). Once again:

()

Go and have a walk or something. Fresh air would do you good, I think.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on March 01, 2009, 09:44:24 AM
People commenting on the rape comments should really make themselves aware of the context in which they were made. And, really, defending your own behavior by comparing to BRTD's is rather stupid. BRTD has been banned before, recall?

That it is very difficult to get Dave to ban someone is not reason for the Moderators to not make it clear that your actions violate the ToS, which includes stating that you risk being banned. If you don't understand why your behavior was problematic, Duke, it doesn't matter what other people have done. You have a problem.

But there are plenty of other people in Atlasia with problems. One is the President, although I think his problematic behavior has taken place primarily elsewhere on the forums. This doesn't excuse anything.

Finally, Xahar-baiting is moronic. He has no influence anywhere. If he's ever unbanned he will continue to be a joke. Stop mentioning his name, period.

This is a very, very sensible post.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on March 01, 2009, 09:57:09 AM
I'm all for tamping things down a little, the rhetoric here seems unnecessary. However, denying the fact that Xahar does have influence is naive and dangerous at worst. The fact that many people, myself included, do not like him in the slightest does not mean that he doesn't hold considerable influence among certain members and has utilized this influence to get proposals like Franzl's proposed constitution out into the public arena.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: afleitch on March 01, 2009, 10:30:10 AM
I'm all for tamping things down a little, the rhetoric here seems unnecessary. However, denying the fact that Xahar does have influence is naive and dangerous at worst. The fact that many people, myself included, do not like him in the slightest does not mean that he doesn't hold considerable influence among certain members and has utilized this influence to get proposals like Franzl's proposed constitution out into the public arena.

Suprisingly the only evidence we have of Xahar 'manipulating' anything is the RPP. As he said to some members he was controlling Franzl which was a lie. That generated some hysteria which caused RPP members to accuse Franzl and not follow correct forum procedure.

As Al has said, raising the spectre of Xahar as 'bogeyman' does no good. The mods know what he is capable of and we take it seriously. The ban we got was the most heavy handed ban that we could get Dave Leip to agree.

The mods are caught between a 'rock and a hard place' ; if we were able to open the Mod's Corner board to everyone for just one day you'd see a completely different side to things.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Lief 🗽 on March 01, 2009, 10:43:47 AM
Question: What is wrong with Xahar having "influence"? Is there a rule against banned people having "influence"?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Verily on March 01, 2009, 11:57:03 AM
(and Xahar would be mentioned a lot less if he was appropriately punished for his actions)
This is key. 

Verily, how can you say Xahar will continue to be a joke when banned?  We have at least 2 people who have openly admitted they have proposed ideas on behalf of Xahar and a few more who admit contact with him.

He has talked to people. Crisis. You may be a solipsist, but most people would agree that everyone has a mind of their own. No ideas have been proposed "on behalf of Xahar", they have only been inspired by some of his statements. Which, as has been pointed out numerous times, doesn't mean anything against those proposals, nor does any of them involve unbanning him (which changes to Atlasian law can't do anyway) or giving him any power.

Quote
The RPP really feels two things are necessary to keep this game civil and smooth:
1.) A full ban of Xahar
2.) Al either being held to moderator standards or unable to moderate RPP member posts

If the RPP gets the latter, I call upon all non-RPP members of Atlasia to leave, permanently. Maybe your goal is just to destroy Atlasia, DWTL, but some people actually enjoyed themselves before you came along.

And Xahar is already banned. And Atlasian politics have no say whatsoever on forum decisions in any case.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Franzl on March 01, 2009, 12:28:26 PM
I think we really need to cool it here. Sure we all need to pay attention and make sure that Xahar doesn't assume too much power, that's perfectly reasonable.

But come on...he's just an obsessed kid, and I don't really think we have that much to worry about (we meaning Atlasia...obviously a different story for people being actively harrassed by him, which it appears is happening).

The guy only has as much power as we give him.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on March 01, 2009, 04:30:40 PM
Quote from: Verily
That it is very difficult to get Dave to ban someone is not reason for the Moderators to not make it clear that your actions violate the ToS, which includes stating that you risk being banned. If you don't understand why your behavior was problematic, Duke, it doesn't matter what other people have done. You have a problem.

I stated in my post that I understand that my accusations were out of line so...

I was asking for fair treatment across the board. Apparently that is too much to ask for around this forum. I know pointing fingers isn't the proper way to go about things, but sometimes exposing some of the hypocrisy around here is the way to go. If someone like BRTD isn't fair game, then who is? I love how all of my examples outside of Ebowed were sluffed off as not counting. 

I'm not asking for soft treatment. I want fair treatment. If I am going to get a warning and a threat of bannishment, I expect others to receive the same when they attack someone or bully them.


The sort of behavior that got you the charming letter that you're very happy with is, or at least was, pretty rare here. But, from what I'm aware, when it has been drawn to our attention it has always been acted on.

Quote
Tell me, was Ebowed reprimanded for his conduct?

See what Gustaf wrote.

Quote
I just want fair treatment. If some members, like yourself, are allowed to run around name calling, creating threads that ridicule certain members (do you just ignore BRTD's bullying of Constine, JJ, Josh22, etc),

Oh for God's sake! You weren't yelled at for mockery or name calling. You were warned because you decide to engage in some pretty serious harassment; the sort of thing that can actually get you in a hell of a lot of trouble out in the real world (you know, like losing your job). I cannot believe that you don't understand this; are you so used to getting your own way that you are incapable of understanding that you crossed some pretty big red lines?

Quote
Don't go whining about how I am the one wanting special treatment when certain posters on this forum are allowed to get away with just about anything

There is only one poster on this forum who is apparently allowed to get away with "just about anything" and it is not BRTD.

Quote
the rape thing, which was a joke blown out of proportion

You aren't still trying to defend that? Hells Teeth.

So now this forum is like the real world? Really? You do realize referring to your boss as Raper of Rapington or a fraud or troll will probably get you fired in the real world too, if we're going to play that game. You do realize accusing someone of being a rapist is crossing some pretty big red lines too, don't you? Or does your conduct not count either in this whole little game?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on March 01, 2009, 05:32:43 PM
So now this forum is like the real world? Really?

No. Let me make this clear to you; this forum happens to be a part of the real world meaning that certain rules (you know, things that us commoners have to abide by and that you are supposed to) from the real world apply here as well.

I think you'll find that the vast majority of posters here have no difficulty grasping this concept and have, in fact, never even needed to give it so much as a second of thought.

Quote
You do realize referring to your boss as Raper of Rapington or a fraud or troll will probably get you fired in the real world too, if we're going to play that game.

You aren't my boss. Actually, you aren't even in a position of authority over me here. Fascinating that you assume that you must be the boss of me in any hypothetical though... says a lot more about you than is especially nice.

Also, there is a difference between casually insulting people and harrassment. You must understand that.

Quote
You do realize accusing someone of being a rapist is crossing some pretty big red lines too, don't you? Or does your conduct not count either in this whole little game?

I don't think that I've ever actually called you a rapist. Besides, I don't see why you keep harking back to that; all it does is remind anyone here at the time quite how much of a disgusting misogynist you are.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Countess Anya of the North Parish on March 01, 2009, 08:24:54 PM
can any of you guys get along? As for Duke and DWTL, can you just accept you did something wrong and move on. This is childish and is RUINING the game. So can you two stop acting like a 5 year old and just learn from you mistakes?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on March 01, 2009, 08:35:17 PM
can any of you guys get along? As for Duke and DWTL, can you just accept you did something wrong and move on. This is childish and is RUINING the game. So can you two stop acting like a 5 year old and just learn from you mistakes?

Pardon my naivete, but wouldn't all that be too...easy? You underestimate the impossibility for people to act as, well, people.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on March 01, 2009, 08:38:51 PM
Some people obviously either are too dumb to realize that this is a game, or they don't want it to be a game.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Countess Anya of the North Parish on March 01, 2009, 09:05:53 PM
can any of you guys get along? As for Duke and DWTL, can you just accept you did something wrong and move on. This is childish and is RUINING the game. So can you two stop acting like a 5 year old and just learn from you mistakes?

Pardon my naivete, but wouldn't all that be too...easy? You underestimate the impossibility for people to act as, well, people.
I see what you are saying, but this bickering should not go on.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on March 01, 2009, 09:13:00 PM
can any of you guys get along? As for Duke and DWTL, can you just accept you did something wrong and move on. This is childish and is RUINING the game. So can you two stop acting like a 5 year old and just learn from you mistakes?

Pardon my naivete, but wouldn't all that be too...easy? You underestimate the impossibility for people to act as, well, people.
I see what you are saying, but this bickering should not go on.

     Yeah, the bickering sucks. I would prefer it if certain people could learn to treat others in a respectable manner, but maturity is hard to come by nowadays. Basically, Duke's comments were stupid, but everyone who gave him a hard time over it needs to grow up & leave him alone.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on March 01, 2009, 09:28:09 PM
So now this forum is like the real world? Really?

No. Let me make this clear to you; this forum happens to be a part of the real world meaning that certain rules (you know, things that us commoners have to abide by and that you are supposed to) from the real world apply here as well.

I think you'll find that the vast majority of posters here have no difficulty grasping this concept and have, in fact, never even needed to give it so much as a second of thought.

Quote
You do realize referring to your boss as Raper of Rapington or a fraud or troll will probably get you fired in the real world too, if we're going to play that game.

You aren't my boss. Actually, you aren't even in a position of authority over me here. Fascinating that you assume that you must be the boss of me in any hypothetical though... says a lot more about you than is especially nice.

Also, there is a difference between casually insulting people and harrassment. You must understand that.

Quote
You do realize accusing someone of being a rapist is crossing some pretty big red lines too, don't you? Or does your conduct not count either in this whole little game?

I don't think that I've ever actually called you a rapist. Besides, I don't see why you keep harking back to that; all it does is remind anyone here at the time quite how much of a disgusting misogynist you are.

Last time I checked, Lewis wasn't my boss either, so I do not understand your point. I did not attack you in any way in that post. You took it upon yourself to crusade against it. I received a much more civil message from Gustaf, which I responded and apologized for my conduct. I have been saying I wronged all along here, but you and some others neglect to read that part and keep on harping that I don't understand. I do. That's not a question to me.

I also never said I was your boss. I was asking you if you'd ever refer to your boss as some of the things you said. Again, I do not understand why you are taking personal offense to this since it was to Lewis, not yourself. If you two are very close, then I apologize for upsetting your friend.

can any of you guys get along? As for Duke and DWTL, can you just accept you did something wrong and move on. This is childish and is RUINING the game. So can you two stop acting like a 5 year old and just learn from you mistakes?

Pardon my naivete, but wouldn't all that be too...easy? You underestimate the impossibility for people to act as, well, people.
I see what you are saying, but this bickering should not go on.

The game is going to be dead, my dear. It's on life support right now. The old guard is retiring and new members have no interest in it. It is pretty pointless, but I enjoy the inner workings of running a party and government. Too many people become obsessed with it and go on power trips.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: I spent the winter writing songs about getting better on March 01, 2009, 10:59:04 PM
I've openly said fuck several times to both my supervisor and the boss of the site, and they've never cared. Not surprising though considering they say it as much as I do.

Anyway, a suggestion for Duke:

If you don't want to be called a rapist, don't openly say that you are a rapist and that you find the concept of rape amusing.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on March 02, 2009, 10:01:10 AM
Last time I checked, Lewis wasn't my boss either, so I do not understand your point.

You mean you aren't aware that you can get into trouble for harrassing, say, a fellow worker? Strange.

You say that you accept that what you did was wrong. This is true, but you don't seem to understand quite how bad it was; you wouldn't be complaining so loudly (or making so many strange comparisions) if you did (neither would you have gone around smearing me in private; I know about that because one of your acolytes PM'ed me demanding to know why I had been "threatening" you).  But I'm happy to let that pass) And, as it happens, I was aware that you'd already been contacted by another moderator (I even hinted that I knew this in the warning). I felt, though, that a sharper warning was necessary to shock some sense into you and to make the consequences of behaving like that in the future very clear.

I don't especially like the suggestion that I've acted in an unprofessional way (I try to draw strict lines between my role as a moderator and my presence as a poster here) , but I'll let it pass as well.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sir Coffeebeans on March 02, 2009, 06:52:01 PM
PiT made a mistake, but its not as if he made it knowingly, so of course he shouldn't be banned. If he did, KNOWINGLY, give Xahar his login and password to his Atlas account, then I think he should be banned. However, the lack of intelligence in his actions should tell the RPP to release him. I suggest removing PiT from the RPP for a month, and then allowing him back, with full priveliges.
I don't understand why giving Xahar such information is such a big offense anyway. It's not as if people have anything to hide......or do they?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 02, 2009, 06:57:41 PM
[I felt, though, that a sharper warning was necessary to shock some sense into you and to make the consequences of behaving like that in the future very clear.
That plan worked to perfection, I honestly don't think how you think anyone is stupid enough to think you have done this if the poster wasn't an RPP member


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on March 02, 2009, 06:58:53 PM
[I felt, though, that a sharper warning was necessary to shock some sense into you and to make the consequences of behaving like that in the future very clear.
That plan worked to perfection, I honestly don't think how you think anyone is stupid enough to think you have done this if the poster wasn't an RPP member

I'm a big fan of keeping various obscure (and to outsiders confusing) English dialects alive, but a translation would be helpful.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 02, 2009, 07:01:02 PM
[I felt, though, that a sharper warning was necessary to shock some sense into you and to make the consequences of behaving like that in the future very clear.
That plan worked to perfection, I honestly don't think how you think anyone is stupid enough to think you have done this if the poster wasn't an RPP member

I'm a big fan of keeping various obscure (and to outsiders confusing) English dialects alive, but a translation would be helpful.
I read that over and I'm not sure how its not clear.

If it was someone other than Duke/myself/SPC, etc. you would not have given the warning


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: afleitch on March 02, 2009, 07:01:37 PM
[I felt, though, that a sharper warning was necessary to shock some sense into you and to make the consequences of behaving like that in the future very clear.
That plan worked to perfection, I honestly don't think how you think anyone is stupid enough to think you have done this if the poster wasn't an RPP member

I'm a big fan of keeping various obscure (and to outsiders confusing) English dialects alive, but a translation would be helpful.
I read that over and I'm not sure how its not clear.

If it was someone other than Duke/myself/SPC, etc. you would not have given the warning

He would.
He has.
And so have I.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 02, 2009, 07:02:39 PM
Easy to say, still not true


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 10, 2009, 05:03:35 PM
Statement on Elections

The party congradulates MasterJedi and Franzl on their recent election to the senate.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 10, 2009, 06:01:55 PM
Declared PPT Support:

DWTL 2 (DWTL, SPC)
HappyWarrior 2 (HW, Franzl)

Yet to declare: Smid, MasterJedi, PiT, RealisticIdealist, Lief, BaconKing


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on March 10, 2009, 06:17:37 PM
     I'll support you.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Smid on March 10, 2009, 06:24:30 PM
I believe DWTL will dutifully perform the responsibilities of the PPT.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 21, 2009, 08:25:00 AM
I believe a convention being held in early April may be in order.  If not a full-blown convention, at least another CORR


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 22, 2009, 09:04:42 AM
After much long debate and deciding that annoying Xahar is no longer necessary, the RPP has decided to release its by-laws

Chair and Vice-Chair
1.) The chairman and vice-chair shall serve a term of at least four months
2.) This term shall conclude two weeks before the beginning of a presidential election
3.) The chairman and vice-chair are voted on at the party convention by approval voting
4.) If the chair or vice-chair fails to gain 50% of the party's support, they are removed from office and a new election is held for the position
5.) Any member of the party has the right to request a vote on the chair and/or vice-chair at the party's convention

Party Dean
1.) The chairman may appoint a party dean to help serve with the chairman and vice-chair
2.) The Dean must be a member of the party for at least two months, or since its inception.
3.) The primary function of the dean will be to settle disputes between the chair and vice-chair

Endorsements
1.) To receive the endorsement of the Regional Protection Party a candidate must receive the endorsement of either the chair and vice-chair or a vote of the party.
2.) Any candidate who does not receive the party endorsement and runs under the party banner is denied support of the party for a minimum of six (6) months

Regional Chairs
1.) Each region shall have its own chair appointed by the party chairman
2.) Regional chairman may be hired/fired at the discretion of the party chair
3.) The primary duty of regional chairs is to remind voters in their regions to vote and to represent the party in their region


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on March 22, 2009, 09:09:29 AM
Diabolical. Especially the part about consuming the elders to gain their powers.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 22, 2009, 09:12:45 AM
Diabolical. Especially the part about consuming the elders to gain their powers.
?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Јas on March 22, 2009, 09:15:06 AM

LOL


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 22, 2009, 09:16:13 AM
I sense sarcasm from Purple State, but one never knows


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 22, 2009, 09:18:21 AM
This actually reminded of me something that I wanted to do but forgot...

Statement from the Chair

Due to his ban from voting, Benconstine is removed as Mideast.  I will taking applications for Mideast chair and plan to appoint one in the coming days.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on March 22, 2009, 09:22:35 AM

I was poking fun at all those who were freaking out about the private RPP server, as if the things found there would be ground-breaking and reveal the deepest secrets of the party. Clearly there is nothing so scandalous about your by-laws.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 22, 2009, 09:24:48 AM
I think it was clear nothing diabolic was happening on the forum when Xahar had access and couldn't produce anything ground-breaking other than the RPP wanted to see Lewis, Al, and Hashpipe out of office


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: afleitch on March 22, 2009, 09:26:55 AM
I think it was clear nothing diabolic was happening on the forum when Xahar had access and couldn't produce anything ground-breaking other than the RPP wanted to see Lewis, Al, and Hashpipe out of office

He has a user-name. It would be nice if you'd use it.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 22, 2009, 09:28:08 AM
I think it was clear nothing diabolic was happening on the forum when Xahar had access and couldn't produce anything ground-breaking other than the RPP wanted to see Lewis, Al, and Hashpipe out of office

He has a user-name. It would be nice if you'd use it.
Really?  Because I seen to be referred to as "Crazy Downy" quite often.  Double standards are wonderful.  I honestly don't think he cares


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 22, 2009, 09:28:48 AM
Just wait to put up the platform, you'll be shaking in your boots.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: SPC on March 22, 2009, 10:01:00 AM
Just wait to put up the platform, you'll be shaking in your boots.

Will you be displaying the part where it says our goal of Atlasian takeover? :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 22, 2009, 10:01:35 AM
Just wait to put up the platform, you'll be shaking in your boots.

Will you be displaying the part where it says our goal of Atlasian takeover? :P
Well, it does need some tweaking before I present it


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: afleitch on March 22, 2009, 10:06:52 AM
Just wait to put up the platform, you'll be shaking in your boots.

Will you be displaying the part where it says our goal of Atlasian takeover? :P
Well, it does need some tweaking before I present it

I've waited several months for this so a few more hours or days won't be too much bother :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on March 22, 2009, 10:17:28 AM
I think I am a member of this party but I don't remember...


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 22, 2009, 10:34:30 AM
I think I am a member of this party but I don't remember...
You most certainly are, do you an update on what has been going on?  Check the private board for any party happenings


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 22, 2009, 10:43:08 AM
The long awaited platform has arrived...

Mission Statement

The Regional Protection Party stands for the rights of regions, in the grand tradition of men like Jefferson, Madison, and Jackson.  We oppose attempts by the federal government to infringe on the rights of regions, and we will continue to oppose any such attempts in the future.

Foreign Policy Issues

Atlasia is and must remain an integral nation on the world stage.  We fully support all other liberal democracies.  During times of global crises Atlasia should lead the good nations of the world in the fight, but we should not bring that fight alone.  As we are one of the many leaders of the spread of democracy, we must also be the vanguard when it comes to military technology.  We cannot rely on the kindness of others when our nation’s future is at stake.  The military should remain robust as long as there are threats to democracy out there.

Our main Foreign Policy goal should be the spread and protection of our fellow democratic states.  We should work with our allies in making life very uncomfortable for the dictatorships and oligarchies of the world.

Economic Issues

"We believe that burdensome taxes stifle opportunity and should be minimised."

"We believe that a budget deficit is a deferred tax that will need to be paid in future budgets, and as such we believe that the government's priority should be balancing the budget."

"We believe that our tax system exists to fund the decent services in health, education, aged care, and other services that Atlasians legitimately expect and are entitled to receive. If after we provide for those services, invest for the future, and balance our budget, we can reduce the tax burden, we should do so."

Education

"The Regional Protection Party believes that every child has a right to access educational services until the age of 18."

"We believe that it is the responsibility of regions to provide a suitable level of education to all children within the region."

Forum Affairs

We believe that to secure the rights of the regions, the Senate must need be deprived of certain law-making powers, namely to prevent it from regulating the affairs of the regions. As such, the president and vice-president's powers would necessarily be reduced as well.

We wish to retain the Class A seats as regional in order to retain the advantages of the regional Senate seat; those being guaranteed representation of all Atlasians, as well as a distinct constituency to which a Senator can be held accountable.

While we support the increased power of the regions, we do recognize that at-large Senate seats do have definite benefits; those benefits including more competitive elections with Senators who are accountable to all the citizens of Atlasia. As such, we wish to retain the Class B seats as at-large.

It is our opinion that a Supreme Court Justice ought must stand for re-confirmation if called for by Senators representing at least three regions.

Social Issues

-Freedom of speech, assembly, religion, the press and respect for the due process of law are essential components to a free society.

-We hold that the right to bear arms is a fundamental freedom. Notwithstanding, the regions shall exercise individual discretion on registration requirements for firearms and other weapons.

-Drug control policy is best decided individually by the regional governments.

-The legality of abortion for any non-medical reason should ultimately be legislated upon by the regional governments.

-We hold that illegal immigration is an issue on which the regions must have greater input. The public infrastructure of each region is utilized by all residents, regardless of legal status. Therefore, it is necessary that all those who reside in Atlasia pay their proper share of taxes.

-Regulation and criminalization of prostitution is an issue which the regional governments must determine individually.

-Environmental protection legislation should be decided upon by the regional governments.

-Educational policy and curricular content must be determined by the regions. In this way, Atlasian students will receive the most relevant instruction and attention to individual needs. The national government cannot provide this with a one size fits all educational plan.

-We believe in strong penalties for violent crime. The final decision on punishment of violent criminals must rest with the regions. The death penalty should be an option if a regional government determines such a measure is appropriate


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 22, 2009, 10:44:16 AM
Note to party members: I just copied/pasted the snipets we had worked out from myself, PiT, Smid, and Brandon.  If anyone objects it should be known soon.

BTW, I don't hear anymore "you're too secretive complaints" :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on March 22, 2009, 10:47:46 AM
Although I am not a member of the RPP, I would very much value an endorsement by your party in the upcoming elections.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on March 22, 2009, 10:50:08 AM
I recognize my preamble, and at least a little of the foreign policy section as mine :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 22, 2009, 10:50:15 AM
Although I am not a member of the RPP, I would very much value an endorsement by your party in the upcoming elections.
Well obviously our first two preferences will go to myself and SPC as you can understand, but if you like to state a case as to why you are the right fit our party feel free to make your case for a 3rd preference (which if there is a surplus can come in handy)

Consider the following:
Are you are dedicated to keeping the regions and regional senators in tact?
Can we trust you will vote for the Council of Governors if it comes up for a vote?
What kind of allegiance to you have to your party members that despise the RPP such as Afletich, HappyWarrior, and Hashemite?
Where do you find major disagreements with our platform?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 22, 2009, 10:50:48 AM
I recognize my preamble, and at least a little of the foreign policy section as mine :)
The preamble is you, but the foreign policy is copy/paste dead0man


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: afleitch on March 22, 2009, 10:51:39 AM
Thank you for posting this :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on March 22, 2009, 10:53:56 AM
I recognize my preamble, and at least a little of the foreign policy section as mine :)
The preamble is you, but the foreign policy is copy/paste dead0man

Yeah, you're right.  That first sentence looked like something I wrote, what with the support of democracies and what-not.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on March 22, 2009, 11:00:16 AM
I make no illusions that I agree 100% with the RPP, but I do think I would make a strong third preference for the RPP.

I believe strongly in a separation between the federal and regional governments. I do support very strongly the maintenance of the regional Senate seats. I feel that the regions play an integral role in the development of Atlasia, especially new members.

However, I cannot guarantee my support for a CoG, nor will I reject fellow DA members such as afleitch, Hashemite, or HappyWarrior. This is because I feel as though a certain question has been missed in the build-up of tensions between federalists and region advocates: what are the regions really meant to do? My answer to this is that the regions must foster involvement, growth, and activity in Atlasia, something I do not see a CoG doing. In addition, the DA is largely made up of current officeholders, something I see as a result of their personal abilities to invoke passion by other members.

Thus, I tell you that no, we are not  perfect fit and my allegiances are to the DA. However, I see the regions as an integral part of Atlasian politics and I will never take actions to hinder the progress of the regions. Nor will I ever consider the federal agenda as separate from the regions. If you have any additional questions feel free to ask.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Lief 🗽 on March 22, 2009, 12:14:44 PM
Well, that wasn't so hard, was it?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 22, 2009, 05:54:43 PM
Hard? No
Necessary? No


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on March 22, 2009, 07:24:04 PM
I make no illusions that I agree 100% with the RPP, but I do think I would make a strong third preference for the RPP.

I believe strongly in a separation between the federal and regional governments. I do support very strongly the maintenance of the regional Senate seats. I feel that the regions play an integral role in the development of Atlasia, especially new members.

However, I cannot guarantee my support for a CoG, nor will I reject fellow DA members such as afleitch, Hashemite, or HappyWarrior. This is because I feel as though a certain question has been missed in the build-up of tensions between federalists and region advocates: what are the regions really meant to do? My answer to this is that the regions must foster involvement, growth, and activity in Atlasia, something I do not see a CoG doing. In addition, the DA is largely made up of current officeholders, something I see as a result of their personal abilities to invoke passion by other members.

Thus, I tell you that no, we are not  perfect fit and my allegiances are to the DA. However, I see the regions as an integral part of Atlasian politics and I will never take actions to hinder the progress of the regions. Nor will I ever consider the federal agenda as separate from the regions. If you have any additional questions feel free to ask.

And just to clarify and prevent any confusion, I do not outright oppose the CoG. I just don't see it as a cure-all to the region vs. federal debate. What would be far more productive is an amendment I have proposed (and that will be sponsored) allowing for dual office-holding on the two levels of government to increase competitiveness and opportunity in regional elections.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on March 22, 2009, 08:03:32 PM
I make no illusions that I agree 100% with the RPP, but I do think I would make a strong third preference for the RPP.

I believe strongly in a separation between the federal and regional governments. I do support very strongly the maintenance of the regional Senate seats. I feel that the regions play an integral role in the development of Atlasia, especially new members.

However, I cannot guarantee my support for a CoG, nor will I reject fellow DA members such as afleitch, Hashemite, or HappyWarrior. This is because I feel as though a certain question has been missed in the build-up of tensions between federalists and region advocates: what are the regions really meant to do? My answer to this is that the regions must foster involvement, growth, and activity in Atlasia, something I do not see a CoG doing. In addition, the DA is largely made up of current officeholders, something I see as a result of their personal abilities to invoke passion by other members.

Thus, I tell you that no, we are not  perfect fit and my allegiances are to the DA. However, I see the regions as an integral part of Atlasian politics and I will never take actions to hinder the progress of the regions. Nor will I ever consider the federal agenda as separate from the regions. If you have any additional questions feel free to ask.

And just to clarify and prevent any confusion, I do not outright oppose the CoG. I just don't see it as a cure-all to the region vs. federal debate. What would be far more productive is an amendment I have proposed (and that will be sponsored) allowing for dual office-holding on the two levels of government to increase competitiveness and opportunity in regional elections.

     I haven't been paying attention to the convention, but I would expect that an alternative solution has been receiving more attention lately.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on March 22, 2009, 08:13:35 PM
Well with the Convention the hope is that all of these issues are resolved in ways we may not currently even consider. But DWTL asked so I was answering the question.

Feel free to ask my opinion on matters that mean more to you. I am unabashed in my pursuit of an RPP endorsement.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: dead0man on March 23, 2009, 05:08:36 AM
I recognize my preamble, and at least a little of the foreign policy section as mine :)
The preamble is you, but the foreign policy is copy/paste dead0man

Yeah, you're right.  That first sentence looked like something I wrote, what with the support of democracies and what-not.
Let's just say I borrowed heavily :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Smid on March 23, 2009, 09:54:13 AM
I recognised my comments on taxation there! I recognise them, having initially stolen them from a couple of other sources...


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 24, 2009, 06:14:47 PM
Anyone wishing to object to the platform and call it to a full party vote has 72 hours to do so.  The motion must be 2nd by another member of the party


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on March 24, 2009, 07:11:39 PM
I recognize my preamble, and at least a little of the foreign policy section as mine :)
The preamble is you, but the foreign policy is copy/paste dead0man

Yeah, you're right.  That first sentence looked like something I wrote, what with the support of democracies and what-not.
Let's just say I borrowed heavily :)

Well, it is an excellent foreign policy platform.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fine...I Made This More Civil on March 25, 2009, 10:30:58 PM
I may consider becoming a member of the RPP, but I have a bone to pick with the platform. I don't believe that the legality of abortion should be decided by the regional government. Although I stand for the rights of states, I fimly believe that a fetus should not be terminated and any fetus that is should be a reason to put the executor behind bars.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 26, 2009, 01:31:01 PM
I may consider becoming a member of the RPP, but I have a bone to pick with the platform. I don't believe that the legality of abortion should be decided by the regional government. Although I stand for the rights of states, I fimly believe that a fetus should not be terminated and any fetus that is should be a reason to put the executor behind bars.
I honestly don't think you are going to find a more conservative party.  We are the most conservative party by far


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on March 26, 2009, 03:29:03 PM
We have a lot of pro-lifers in the RPP, so you should be fine.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on March 26, 2009, 03:32:57 PM
We have a lot of pro-lifers in the RPP, so you should be fine.

     Not to mention leaving the issue up to the states is the most conservative position any party would take here. Due to the largely leftist composition of the forum, many parties would be unwilling to take any position to the right of full legalization in the first two trimesters.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on March 26, 2009, 03:37:54 PM
We have a lot of pro-lifers in the RPP, so you should be fine.

     Not to mention leaving the issue up to the states is the most conservative position any party would take here. Due to the largely leftist composition of the forum, many parties would be unwilling to take any position to the right of full legalization in the first two trimesters.

I would be against any sort of legislation that would ban abortion myself.

But yes, this is as good as you'll get in Atlasia unless you form your own party, which isn't recommended.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: RI on March 26, 2009, 03:45:28 PM
We have a lot of pro-lifers in the RPP, so you should be fine.

     Not to mention leaving the issue up to the states is the most conservative position any party would take here. Due to the largely leftist composition of the forum, many parties would be unwilling to take any position to the right of full legalization in the first two trimesters.

Kinda sad, IMHO. :(


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fine...I Made This More Civil on March 26, 2009, 04:34:26 PM
We have a lot of pro-lifers in the RPP, so you should be fine.

     Not to mention leaving the issue up to the states is the most conservative position any party would take here. Due to the largely leftist composition of the forum, many parties would be unwilling to take any position to the right of full legalization in the first two trimesters.

Yes, I have noticed that this forum is, for the most part, on the left. However, this party seems to be doing very well, all factors in consideration.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: RI on March 26, 2009, 04:55:29 PM
We have a lot of pro-lifers in the RPP, so you should be fine.

     Not to mention leaving the issue up to the states is the most conservative position any party would take here. Due to the largely leftist composition of the forum, many parties would be unwilling to take any position to the right of full legalization in the first two trimesters.

Yes, I have noticed that this forum is, for the most part, on the left. However, this party seems to be doing very well, all factors in consideration.

It helps that there are four liberal parties and only one conservative party. ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fine...I Made This More Civil on March 26, 2009, 05:11:00 PM
We have a lot of pro-lifers in the RPP, so you should be fine.

     Not to mention leaving the issue up to the states is the most conservative position any party would take here. Due to the largely leftist composition of the forum, many parties would be unwilling to take any position to the right of full legalization in the first two trimesters.

Yes, I have noticed that this forum is, for the most part, on the left. However, this party seems to be doing very well, all factors in consideration.

It helps that there are four liberal parties and only one conservative party. ;)

True, that.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fine...I Made This More Civil on March 26, 2009, 05:16:14 PM
I have a question to the RPP in general. I see there is a national Senate election coming up. If I were to run, would I receive the support of the RPP, or would I be running against one of my own party? I know there are five nationally elected positions, but would it align with the party's goals that I run in this upcoming election?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 26, 2009, 05:30:37 PM
I have a question to the RPP in general. I see there is a national Senate election coming up. If I were to run, would I receive the support of the RPP, or would I be running against one of my own party? I know there are five nationally elected positions, but would it align with the party's goals that I run in this upcoming election?
No offense to yourself, but the party has determined the ceiling for our party electing candidates in the nationwide election is 2, and myself and SPC have already declared our intentions to run for re-election.  You may consider moving to a region such as the Mideast to run for senate in the next regional elections.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fine...I Made This More Civil on March 26, 2009, 05:32:22 PM
I have a question to the RPP in general. I see there is a national Senate election coming up. If I were to run, would I receive the support of the RPP, or would I be running against one of my own party? I know there are five nationally elected positions, but would it align with the party's goals that I run in this upcoming election?
No offense to yourself, but the party has determined the ceiling for our party electing candidates in the nationwide election is 2, and myself and SPC have already declared our intentions to run for re-election.  You may consider moving to a region such as the Mideast to run for senate in the next regional elections.

OK then. I will consider that. Why the ceiling of two, though?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: SPC on March 26, 2009, 07:18:01 PM
I have a question to the RPP in general. I see there is a national Senate election coming up. If I were to run, would I receive the support of the RPP, or would I be running against one of my own party? I know there are five nationally elected positions, but would it align with the party's goals that I run in this upcoming election?
No offense to yourself, but the party has determined the ceiling for our party electing candidates in the nationwide election is 2, and myself and SPC have already declared our intentions to run for re-election.  You may consider moving to a region such as the Mideast to run for senate in the next regional elections.

OK then. I will consider that. Why the ceiling of two, though?

We ran two candidates in the last election and both of us barely won. Any more and we would have certainly lost.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fine...I Made This More Civil on March 26, 2009, 07:22:03 PM
I have a question to the RPP in general. I see there is a national Senate election coming up. If I were to run, would I receive the support of the RPP, or would I be running against one of my own party? I know there are five nationally elected positions, but would it align with the party's goals that I run in this upcoming election?
No offense to yourself, but the party has determined the ceiling for our party electing candidates in the nationwide election is 2, and myself and SPC have already declared our intentions to run for re-election.  You may consider moving to a region such as the Mideast to run for senate in the next regional elections.

OK then. I will consider that. Why the ceiling of two, though?

We ran two candidates in the last election and both of us barely won. Any more and we would have certainly lost.

I see. I guess you would not want to split the vote. However, if we could gain the support of some independents, we could afford to run a third candidate.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Brandon H on March 26, 2009, 10:13:59 PM
You'd have to take a look at the results of the previous election and understand the PR-STV system we use here. After that and looking at the voter rolls, it will make sense why we only run two candidates. (Of course if we get more right leaning persons involved in the game, we may be able to run more candidates in the future.)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fine...I Made This More Civil on March 26, 2009, 10:21:17 PM
You'd have to take a look at the results of the previous election and understand the PR-STV system we use here. After that and looking at the voter rolls, it will make sense why we only run two candidates. (Of course if we get more right leaning persons involved in the game, we may be able to run more candidates in the future.)

Then that should be a goal of ours. I believe we have 6 Senators at the moment, but there is really very little chance we can improve on that, considering that the Pacific is a dead region to us, according to DWTL. I am willing to pitch in for recruitment, if necessary. Really, if we lose another Senator, we will no longer have a majority, making it more difficult to pass our agendas.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: RIP Robert H Bork on March 26, 2009, 10:45:57 PM
As I said when I last registered (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=34355.msg1921542#msg1921542), I am currently an independent, though I may consider joining one of the major parties soon. As far as I know the RPP is the most right wing of the major parties (the only right wing major party in fact), but I have some beef with it, and not just with parts of the platform.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on March 26, 2009, 11:31:45 PM
How can so many people have beefs with our party when they've just joined Atlas?

We aren't here to cater to specific members. We are the premiere and only right leaning party in Atlas. If you want to stay as an independent, fine. No one is forcing you to join. We'd love for you all to join and help us out, but not if you're going to complain about it all the time.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on March 26, 2009, 11:43:28 PM
How can so many people have beefs with our party when they've just joined Atlas?

We aren't here to cater to specific members. We are the premiere and only right leaning party in Atlas. If you want to stay as an independent, fine. No one is forcing you to join. We'd love for you all to join and help us out, but not if you're going to complain about it all the time.

     I suspect it's more like a beef with certain prominent members of the party.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Eraserhead on March 27, 2009, 12:58:20 AM

briNg bacK OGIS!!!!11


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 27, 2009, 09:37:48 AM
How can so many people have beefs with our party when they've just joined Atlas?

We aren't here to cater to specific members. We are the premiere and only right leaning party in Atlas. If you want to stay as an independent, fine. No one is forcing you to join. We'd love for you all to join and help us out, but not if you're going to complain about it all the time.

     I suspect it's more like a beef with certain prominent members of the party.
Who?  He gave both myself, SPC, and almost all our other candidates first preference


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on March 27, 2009, 10:11:05 AM
How can so many people have beefs with our party when they've just joined Atlas?

We aren't here to cater to specific members. We are the premiere and only right leaning party in Atlas. If you want to stay as an independent, fine. No one is forcing you to join. We'd love for you all to join and help us out, but not if you're going to complain about it all the time.

     I suspect it's more like a beef with certain prominent members of the party.
Who?  He gave both myself, SPC, and almost all our other candidates first preference

     He hates me & Duke IIRC.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on March 27, 2009, 10:58:54 AM
How can so many people have beefs with our party when they've just joined Atlas?

We aren't here to cater to specific members. We are the premiere and only right leaning party in Atlas. If you want to stay as an independent, fine. No one is forcing you to join. We'd love for you all to join and help us out, but not if you're going to complain about it all the time.

     I suspect it's more like a beef with certain prominent members of the party.
Who?  He gave both myself, SPC, and almost all our other candidates first preference

     He hates me & Duke IIRC.

Yes, because I am a "moderate liberal" as he likes to point out.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Brandon H on March 27, 2009, 11:11:47 PM
You can either have allies that agree with you on some issues or no allies at all. You won't get people that agree with you on every issue, especially if you are a right leaning individual.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on March 29, 2009, 07:54:39 PM
     Figured I ought to update the map. Through Persepolis:

(
)

     We now have 7 members in the Southeast, 5 in the Mideast, 3 in the Northeast, 3 in the Midwest, & 2 in the Pacific. We now have 20 members total. Hopefully we can gain a few more recruits soon.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on March 29, 2009, 08:30:12 PM
     That was current for all of half an hour. :P

(
)

     We now have 7 members in the Southeast, 6 in the Mideast, 3 in the Northeast, 3 in the Midwest, & 2 in the Pacific. We now have 21 members. First time Kentucky has had a voter since I joined the forum. I think this means there's just three or four states left with no voters.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 29, 2009, 08:31:13 PM
The most important number in that equation


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on March 29, 2009, 08:32:39 PM

     I think we should redouble our recruitment efforts in the Southeast, though.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on March 29, 2009, 08:35:32 PM

Just make sure to be smart about who you run in the Mideast Senate race against HW. As you know we tend to be an active region and not all that ideologically driven. The current Assembly and Governor have no had a single partisan struggle yet. And we tend to view HW favorably.

Just don't hurt your party image trying to get the seat.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 29, 2009, 08:35:50 PM

     I think we should redouble our recruitment efforts in the Southeast, though.
We don't have competition in the Southeast for the most part, taking HW is going to require a few more votes IMHO


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 29, 2009, 08:36:44 PM

Just make sure to be smart about who you run in the Mideast Senate race against HW. As you know we tend to be an active region and not all that ideologically driven. The current Assembly and Governor have no had a single partisan struggle yet. And we tend to view HW favorably.

Just don't hurt your party image trying to get the seat.
Well obviously Inks would be our ideal candidate, but I don't think he wants to leave the executive branch.  It would be harming the interests of our party if we did not try to go after this seat, the only regional seat we do not hold that we can conceivably hold.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on March 29, 2009, 08:38:22 PM

Just make sure to be smart about who you run in the Mideast Senate race against HW. As you know we tend to be an active region and not all that ideologically driven. The current Assembly and Governor have no had a single partisan struggle yet. And we tend to view HW favorably.

Just don't hurt your party image trying to get the seat.
Well obviously Inks would be our ideal candidate, but I don't think he wants to leave the executive branch.  It would be harming the interests of our party if we did not try to go after this seat, the only regional seat we do not hold that we can conceivably hold.

Oh, I'm not saying you shouldn't try. But make sure to pick a candidate that is an active and recognized member of the region or you risk losing more than just a race there. And yeah, Inks would be your ideal candidate, but we love him as Governor and hope to keep him there.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on March 29, 2009, 08:42:51 PM
I intend to vote for HW unless Inks challenges him.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on March 29, 2009, 08:46:13 PM

     I think we should redouble our recruitment efforts in the Southeast, though.
We don't have competition in the Southeast for the most part, taking HW is going to require a few more votes IMHO

     However, the Southeast has shrunken in recent months while other regions have grown. We need to get more people (more active ones of course), or sparking activity becomes that much harder.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fine...I Made This More Civil on March 30, 2009, 05:23:08 PM

Just make sure to be smart about who you run in the Mideast Senate race against HW. As you know we tend to be an active region and not all that ideologically driven. The current Assembly and Governor have no had a single partisan struggle yet. And we tend to view HW favorably.

Just don't hurt your party image trying to get the seat.
Well obviously Inks would be our ideal candidate, but I don't think he wants to leave the executive branch.  It would be harming the interests of our party if we did not try to go after this seat, the only regional seat we do not hold that we can conceivably hold.

Oh, I'm not saying you shouldn't try. But make sure to pick a candidate that is an active and recognized member of the region or you risk losing more than just a race there. And yeah, Inks would be your ideal candidate, but we love him as Governor and hope to keep him there.

Well, I am a relatively new member, but I am sure that my running in any Senatorial election would not tarnish the reputation of the RPP. I am sure I can provide a new outlook on Atlasia and be a fresh face in Atlasian politics. Senator Realisticidealist was a very junior member when he ran and won his Senate race, and that only helped the JCP as a whole.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on March 30, 2009, 05:38:22 PM
I'll decide soon if I want to run for another reelection or not. Right now I am consumed with school work and other activities, and I have been bad about being active. The Dirty South has shrunken in size recently, and I take responsibility for that. Come the beginning of May, I'll be out for the summer and my free time to run things will increase. It's just whether the Dirty South needs to go through another month of inactivity is the question.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Devilman88 on March 30, 2009, 05:41:37 PM
I'll decide soon if I want to run for another reelection or not. Right now I am consumed with school work and other activities, and I have been bad about being active. The Dirty South has shrunken in size recently, and I take responsibility for that. Come the beginning of May, I'll be out for the summer and my free time to run things will increase. It's just whether the Dirty South needs to go through another month of inactivity is the question.

Couldn't you get the LT. Governor to step up and take some of the duties you do?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 30, 2009, 05:43:11 PM
As a heads up, I do intend to run for governor whenever Duke decides to step down


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Devilman88 on March 30, 2009, 05:44:28 PM
As a heads up, I do intend to run for governor whenever Duke decides to step down

What state are you in?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 30, 2009, 05:45:54 PM
As a heads up, I do intend to run for governor whenever Duke decides to step down

What state are you in?
Alabama, I moved down there when we threatended secession and in turn created the RPP.  Read the beginning of this thread for details


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 30, 2009, 05:51:13 PM
Inks will NOT be running.  Time to groom another candidate


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Devilman88 on March 30, 2009, 05:55:14 PM
Inks will NOT be running.  Time to groom another candidate

Inks is not running for what?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on March 30, 2009, 05:56:46 PM
Inks will NOT be running.  Time to groom another candidate

Inks is not running for what?
Senate in June


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: afleitch on March 30, 2009, 05:58:37 PM
Inks will NOT be running.  Time to groom another candidate

Inks is not running for what?

Mideast Senate.

Despite defeating me, he is doing a very good job as governor, I'd vote for him (as he has continued what I had started) and he's popular.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Devilman88 on March 30, 2009, 05:59:48 PM

Ah ok, well June is far away.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fine...I Made This More Civil on March 30, 2009, 06:41:56 PM
Inks will NOT be running.  Time to groom another candidate

I would like to throw my name on the table for early candidacy, so we can organize a runoff if necessary.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on March 30, 2009, 07:06:41 PM
I'm happy with Inks's choice, as it increases the likelihood of keeping two good representatives of the Mideast in place.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on April 12, 2009, 01:32:51 PM
Preference for April elections:

DWTL/SPC
SPC/DWTL
Purple State
Franzl

Might get a longer list eventually


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on April 12, 2009, 10:18:10 PM
I want to thank the RPP for placing me in the third preference slot for the April elections. I hope that we will be able to work together to create a more open Senate, more active regions, and more productive government.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: afleitch on April 13, 2009, 08:39:55 AM
Dissapointing, however only in the sense that I had wished and requested to speak to the party prior to a vote being held.

Ah well. That's politics for you :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on April 13, 2009, 06:25:14 PM
Dissapointing, however only in the sense that I had wished and requested to speak to the party prior to a vote being held.

Ah well. That's politics for you :)
We very well may still have a convention, but we felt our endorsement could not wait any longer


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: afleitch on April 13, 2009, 06:28:49 PM
Dissapointing, however only in the sense that I had wished and requested to speak to the party prior to a vote being held.

Ah well. That's politics for you :)
We very well may still have a convention, but we felt our endorsement could not wait any longer

If I had known when you were holding the vote, I would have PMed you something to put to the members as I had suggested before I left for the week. No worries.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Franzl on April 14, 2009, 02:01:22 PM
I welcome any RPP support in the upcoming election.

Although we have many ideological differences, we have managed to work together on several pieces of legislation, and I think that's worked out really well.

I did not publicly seek the RPP's endorsement as I do not believe it to be very fair towards my own party and its members, but as said, I welcome support and votes from people of all parties and ideologies that believe that I can work well with them to reach common goals.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on July 02, 2009, 05:02:45 PM
(
)

     Updated map showing where we have members. We now have 8 members in the Southeast, 7 in the Mideast, 7 in the Midwest, 3 in the Northeast, & 3 in the Pacific.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on July 02, 2009, 05:39:55 PM
We have 28 members?? :)

I don't think we've ever had that many

Still we must never forget the DAPS which is the acronym I just made up for the founding members :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on July 02, 2009, 05:41:39 PM
DAPS = what now?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on July 02, 2009, 07:58:19 PM

    (D)WTL, (A)HDuke99, (P)iT, (S)PC, I assume.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on July 02, 2009, 11:03:11 PM
(D)WTL
(A)HDuke
(P)iT
(S)outhParkConservative

Duke, I must say I am still very upset that you left the Governor's Plantation.  No offense to anyone else here, but you always have been my favorite Atlasian for your throw it all on the line, have no fear attitude.  Without it, conservatives would not exist in this great nation of ours.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on July 08, 2009, 01:12:25 AM
Sign me up on the Pacific side, yeah? I think that brings it up to 4.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on July 08, 2009, 01:38:30 AM
(D)WTL
(A)HDuke
(P)iT
(S)outhParkConservative

Duke, I must say I am still very upset that you left the Governor's Plantation.  No offense to anyone else here, but you always have been my favorite Atlasian for your throw it all on the line, have no fear attitude.  Without it, conservatives would not exist in this great nation of ours.

I'm very sad he left too, honestly. I practically begged him to stay. :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on July 08, 2009, 01:41:15 AM
Sign me up on the Pacific side, yeah? I think that brings it up to 4.

     Indeed it does. :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: big bad fab on July 08, 2009, 04:45:22 PM
I'm sorry, my friends, but in AtlasWiki, you've forgotten me in Ohio. Maybe in your map and count as well...
A pity, as I'll be loyal in my votes, believe me ! And in MidEast, I'll be useful I think...


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on July 08, 2009, 04:48:35 PM
I'm sorry, my friends, but in AtlasWiki, you've forgotten me in Ohio. Maybe in your map and count as well...
A pity, as I'll be loyal in my votes, believe me ! And in MidEast, I'll be useful I think...

     You mean the membership list? I stopped updating that a while ago, but I could resume with it. Also, I definitely counted you in the map. We don't have any other party members in Ohio.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: big bad fab on July 08, 2009, 04:51:54 PM
I'm sorry, my friends, but in AtlasWiki, you've forgotten me in Ohio. Maybe in your map and count as well...
A pity, as I'll be loyal in my votes, believe me ! And in MidEast, I'll be useful I think...

     You mean the membership list? I stopped updating that a while ago, but I could resume with it. Also, I definitely counted you in the map. We don't have any other party members in Ohio.
Yeah, the membership list. In fact, many lists (voters, etc) seem a bot outdated... Never mind.

Oh, so, on the map, I haven't understood colors... Too many maps for the "what-ifs" sections I think... :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on July 08, 2009, 04:53:57 PM
     I just looked at it, & tmth updated it after I stopped. I think he might've actually forgotten to add you, but I would have to check to make sure.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on July 08, 2009, 05:33:53 PM
I want to post this so everyone can see it. We have been in the process of creating an official RPP logo. I did this mockup last night and I need feedback from more than just a few people.

()

Let me know what you'd like to see changed, if anything. Please nothing too complicated. I know someone wanted the star through the hole on the P, but that would take me a good three hours to do, and I haven't the patience to do it on an unpaid project.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on July 08, 2009, 06:54:52 PM
I'm really glad the RPP is working on a Logo, the Introduction to Atlasia thread could really use it. :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on July 08, 2009, 07:07:08 PM
I'm really glad the RPP is working on a Logo, the Introduction to Atlasia thread could really use it. :)

We were pushing for one before the election but with all the Persepolis crap and then the election itself it got placed on the backburner. There is competition though so we still have a ways to go before you can update the introduction thread. However the Party numbers are I beleive out of date as I think currently we have either 30 or 31 members now.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on July 08, 2009, 07:08:25 PM
I'm really glad the RPP is working on a Logo, the Introduction to Atlasia thread could really use it. :)

We were pushing for one before the election but with all the Persepolis crap and then the election itself it got placed on the backburner. There is competition though so we still have a ways to go before you can update the introduction thread. However the Party numbers are I beleive out of date as I think currently we have either 30 or 31 members now.

Yes I'm sure they are out of date. I'll correct them based on the SoFA's count at some point tonight.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on July 08, 2009, 07:13:41 PM
I'm really glad the RPP is working on a Logo, the Introduction to Atlasia thread could really use it. :)

We were pushing for one before the election but with all the Persepolis crap and then the election itself it got placed on the backburner. There is competition though so we still have a ways to go before you can update the introduction thread. However the Party numbers are I beleive out of date as I think currently we have either 30 or 31 members now.

Yes I'm sure they are out of date. I'll correct them based on the SoFA's count at some point tonight.


Its 30 according to the wiki. That is probably the best course though. I am sure the JCP has added some more deadwood since then as well. :D.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on July 08, 2009, 07:27:44 PM
I'm really glad the RPP is working on a Logo, the Introduction to Atlasia thread could really use it. :)

We were pushing for one before the election but with all the Persepolis crap and then the election itself it got placed on the backburner. There is competition though so we still have a ways to go before you can update the introduction thread. However the Party numbers are I beleive out of date as I think currently we have either 30 or 31 members now.

Yes I'm sure they are out of date. I'll correct them based on the SoFA's count at some point tonight.


Its 30 according to the wiki. That is probably the best course though. I am sure the JCP has added some more deadwood since then as well. :D.

     I don't really recall any JCP recruits in the past couple of weeks.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on July 08, 2009, 07:54:13 PM
I'm really glad the RPP is working on a Logo, the Introduction to Atlasia thread could really use it. :)

We were pushing for one before the election but with all the Persepolis crap and then the election itself it got placed on the backburner. There is competition though so we still have a ways to go before you can update the introduction thread. However the Party numbers are I beleive out of date as I think currently we have either 30 or 31 members now.

Yes I'm sure they are out of date. I'll correct them based on the SoFA's count at some point tonight.


Its 30 according to the wiki. That is probably the best course though. I am sure the JCP has added some more deadwood since then as well. :D.

     I don't really recall any JCP recruits in the past couple of weeks.

They have more then 32, which is what the Introduction thread says.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on July 09, 2009, 02:31:07 AM
Are we going to be fielding any candidates in the Pacific for the Gov/Lt Gov?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on July 09, 2009, 02:36:07 AM
Are we going to be fielding any candidates in the Pacific for the Gov/Lt Gov?

     We generally haven't, considering the strength of the JCP in the region. If you want to run for it though, we would be happy to support you in your bid for office.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on July 09, 2009, 01:09:06 PM
Are we going to be fielding any candidates in the Pacific for the Gov/Lt Gov?

     We generally haven't, considering the strength of the JCP in the region. If you want to run for it though, we would be happy to support you in your bid for office.

lol, don't try.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on July 09, 2009, 02:07:57 PM
Are we going to be fielding any candidates in the Pacific for the Gov/Lt Gov?

     We generally haven't, considering the strength of the JCP in the region. If you want to run for it though, we would be happy to support you in your bid for office.

lol, don't try.

     Noted, but not listened to.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on July 09, 2009, 02:34:35 PM
Are we going to be fielding any candidates in the Pacific for the Gov/Lt Gov?

     We generally haven't, considering the strength of the JCP in the region. If you want to run for it though, we would be happy to support you in your bid for office.

lol, don't try.

     Noted, but not listened to.

Not talking to you.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on July 09, 2009, 04:53:24 PM
Are we going to be fielding any candidates in the Pacific for the Gov/Lt Gov?

     We generally haven't, considering the strength of the JCP in the region. If you want to run for it though, we would be happy to support you in your bid for office.

lol, don't try.

     Noted, but not listened to.

Not talking to you.

Unlike the DA we do have very effective and efficient security services, thanks to SPC. So if you don't remove yourself from these here premises we shall arrest ye for trespassing.

Considering how many times you ran SDP candidates into a hail of lead from the JCP who outnumbered and outgunned you, you of all people have no place lecturing any of us on the futililty of a race. Even if he does lose it will be a good learning experience for him. Lord knows you lost quite a good many times, actually, have you ever won anything?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on July 10, 2009, 12:32:51 AM
And I've learned now, see?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on July 10, 2009, 12:34:43 AM

lol, you could have fooled me.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on July 10, 2009, 12:41:36 AM

Let me settle down into my new role of semi-crazy old guy.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on July 10, 2009, 01:13:40 PM
My "submission" for our new logo. Criticism welcome.

()


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on July 10, 2009, 02:43:35 PM
My "submission" for our new logo. Criticism welcome.

()

Yuck. KidPix.

What a gay logo.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Devilman88 on July 10, 2009, 03:54:14 PM
Here is one I made.

()


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Countess Anya of the North Parish on July 10, 2009, 03:55:50 PM
you can barely see the letters. but i like it. maybe you should make the letters stand out more.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: the artist formerly known as catmusic on July 10, 2009, 03:57:58 PM

KidPix? That stupid thing? Doesn't look like kidpix to me. Although, it does, somewhat.....


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Barnes on July 10, 2009, 04:06:52 PM
Just a friendly suggestion form a DA member, why don't you use your party colors? Dark Khaki. And maybe display the flag of the Dirty South.

Just a suggestion. :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Countess Anya of the North Parish on July 10, 2009, 04:07:49 PM
Just a friendly suggestion form a DA member, why don't you use your party colors? Dark Khaki. And maybe display the flag of the Dirty South.

Just a suggestion. :)

good point. what he said.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: RIP Robert H Bork on July 10, 2009, 04:15:23 PM
Just a friendly suggestion form a DA member from an independent, why don't you use your party colors? Dark Khaki. As well as your slogan, "Power to the Regions". And maybe display the flag of the Dirty South map of the regions.

Just a suggestion. :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Barnes on July 10, 2009, 04:27:58 PM
Just a friendly suggestion form a DA member from an independent, why don't you use your party colors? Dark Khaki. As well as your slogan, "Power to the Regions". And maybe display the flag of the Dirty South map of the regions.

Just a suggestion. :)

That's cool too. ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on July 10, 2009, 09:29:28 PM
IDK?

i think you are really crossing the line.
What line?

Why?

If you stop that would be greatly appreciated.
...

If you can't you might get banned for offense.


What offense?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on July 10, 2009, 09:31:53 PM

Potential Violation of the TOS you signed when you joined the forums.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Countess Anya of the North Parish on July 10, 2009, 09:33:14 PM
you now what you did. you wanted the reaction. and we want you gone. So if one day you can't get back on. There is a reason. remember this momenet.
I think he did violate it.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on July 10, 2009, 09:35:59 PM
you now what you did. you wanted the reaction. and we want you gone. So if one day you can't get back on. There is a reason. remember this momenet.
I think he did violate it.

I think he did, I have been trying to find somewhere where you can the read the TOS in full, just for these sorts of things. And wouldn't you know it not one damn Moderator is currently online. Except for one that probably went off 12 minutes ago but is still listed at the bottom.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Countess Anya of the North Parish on July 10, 2009, 09:43:35 PM
here it is:

You agree, through your use of this forum, that you will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, adult material, or otherwise in violation of any International or United States Federal law. You also agree not to post any copyrighted material unless you own the copyright or you have written consent from the owner of the copyrighted material. Spam, flooding, advertisements, chain letters, pyramid schemes, and solicitations are also forbidden on this forum.

Note that it is impossible for the staff or the owners of this forum to confirm the validity of posts. Please remember that we do not actively monitor the posted messages, and as such, are not responsible for the content contained within. We do not warrant the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information presented. The posted messages express the views of the author, and not necessarily the views of this forum, its staff, its subsidiaries, or this forum's owner. Anyone who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to notify an administrator or moderator of this forum immediately. The staff and the owner of this forum reserve the right to remove objectionable content, within a reasonable time frame, if they determine that removal is necessary. This is a manual process, however, please realize that they may not be able to remove or edit particular messages immediately. This policy applies to member profile information as well.

You remain solely responsible for the content of your posted messages. Furthermore, you agree to indemnify and hold harmless the owners of this forum, any related websites to this forum, its staff, and its subsidiaries. The owners of this forum also reserve the right to reveal your identity (or any other related information collected on this service) in the event of a formal complaint or legal action arising from any situation caused by your use of this forum.

You have the ability, as you register, to choose your username. We advise that you keep the name appropriate. With this user account you are about to register, you agree to never give your password out to another person except an administrator, for your protection and for validity reasons. You also agree to NEVER use another person's account for any reason.  We also HIGHLY recommend you use a complex and unique password for your account, to prevent account theft.

After you register and login to this forum, you will be able to fill out a detailed profile. It is your responsibility to present clean and accurate information. Any information the forum owner or staff determines to be inaccurate or vulgar in nature will be removed, with or without prior notice. Appropriate sanctions may be applicable.

Please note that with each post, your IP address is recorded, in the event that you need to be banned from this forum or your ISP contacted. This will only happen in the event of a major violation of this agreement.

Also note that the software places a cookie, a text file containing bits of information (such as your username and password), in your browser's cache. This is ONLY used to keep you logged in/out. The software does not collect or send any other form of information to your computer.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on July 10, 2009, 09:45:16 PM
     I'd say it qualifies as defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, hateful, & harassing.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Countess Anya of the North Parish on July 10, 2009, 09:47:42 PM
lets move on. he will be taken care of.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on July 10, 2009, 09:48:27 PM
Opebo posts material which is vulgar,profane, sexually oriented, adult material.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on July 10, 2009, 09:48:49 PM
here it is:

You agree, through your use of this forum, that you will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, adult material, or otherwise in violation of any International or United States Federal law. You also agree not to post any copyrighted material unless you own the copyright or you have written consent from the owner of the copyrighted material. Spam, flooding, advertisements, chain letters, pyramid schemes, and solicitations are also forbidden on this forum.

Note that it is impossible for the staff or the owners of this forum to confirm the validity of posts. Please remember that we do not actively monitor the posted messages, and as such, are not responsible for the content contained within. We do not warrant the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information presented. The posted messages express the views of the author, and not necessarily the views of this forum, its staff, its subsidiaries, or this forum's owner. Anyone who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to notify an administrator or moderator of this forum immediately. The staff and the owner of this forum reserve the right to remove objectionable content, within a reasonable time frame, if they determine that removal is necessary. This is a manual process, however, please realize that they may not be able to remove or edit particular messages immediately. This policy applies to member profile information as well.

You remain solely responsible for the content of your posted messages. Furthermore, you agree to indemnify and hold harmless the owners of this forum, any related websites to this forum, its staff, and its subsidiaries. The owners of this forum also reserve the right to reveal your identity (or any other related information collected on this service) in the event of a formal complaint or legal action arising from any situation caused by your use of this forum.

You have the ability, as you register, to choose your username. We advise that you keep the name appropriate. With this user account you are about to register, you agree to never give your password out to another person except an administrator, for your protection and for validity reasons. You also agree to NEVER use another person's account for any reason.  We also HIGHLY recommend you use a complex and unique password for your account, to prevent account theft.

After you register and login to this forum, you will be able to fill out a detailed profile. It is your responsibility to present clean and accurate information. Any information the forum owner or staff determines to be inaccurate or vulgar in nature will be removed, with or without prior notice. Appropriate sanctions may be applicable.

Please note that with each post, your IP address is recorded, in the event that you need to be banned from this forum or your ISP contacted. This will only happen in the event of a major violation of this agreement.

Also note that the software places a cookie, a text file containing bits of information (such as your username and password), in your browser's cache. This is ONLY used to keep you logged in/out. The software does not collect or send any other form of information to your computer.


I just copied and pasted the whole think into Notepad and saved it. Thanks Madame la Resource :)

     I'd say it qualifies as defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, hateful, & harassing.

Most definately


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MasterJedi on July 10, 2009, 09:51:24 PM
Don't worry about it, it's been noted. And I'm leaving it for evidence even though we can't see it anymore.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on July 10, 2009, 09:54:31 PM
Don't worry about it, it's been noted. And I'm leaving it for evidence even though we can't see it anymore.

     Thank you for the help! :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on July 10, 2009, 09:55:22 PM
Don't worry about it, it's been noted. And I'm leaving it for evidence even though we can't see it anymore.

What are you talking about, its visible at the top of this page and the previous one. I guess they just don't make mods like they used to, anymore ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MasterJedi on July 10, 2009, 09:56:08 PM
Don't worry about it, it's been noted. And I'm leaving it for evidence even though we can't see it anymore.

What are you talking about, its visible at the top of this page and the previous one. I guess they just don't make mods like they used to, anymore ;)

Well my comp was being dumb so I couldn't see it before. Now I can again. Just know it has been noted.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on July 10, 2009, 10:01:26 PM
Opebo posts material which is vulgar,profane, sexually oriented, adult material.

Are you going too ban him?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on July 10, 2009, 10:13:33 PM
Opebo posts material which is vulgar,profane, sexually oriented, adult material.

Are you going too ban him?

You can't justify your own bad behavior by pointing out someone elses.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Countess Anya of the North Parish on July 10, 2009, 10:17:58 PM
Opebo posts material which is vulgar,profane, sexually oriented, adult material.

Are you going too ban him?

You can't justify your own bad behavior by pointing out someone elses.
^^^ yup. but can we all ignore him and move on now.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on July 11, 2009, 10:06:20 AM
Membership: 2
Trolls-and-or-Frauds: 2

lol

joke party
Still hilarious as we approach our one year anniversary


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese on July 11, 2009, 02:06:31 PM
I probably shouldn't make logos for parties I'm not a member of, but I made one just for fun anyway. :P

Combination of Isaac's logo and this:

Quote
Just a friendly suggestion form a DA member from an independent, why don't you use your party colors? Dark Khaki. As well as your slogan, "Power to the Regions". And maybe display the flag of the Dirty South map of the regions.

Just a suggestion. :)


()



Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: SPC on July 11, 2009, 02:43:02 PM
I probably shouldn't make logos for parties I'm not a member of, but I made one just for fun anyway. :P

Combination of Isaac's logo and this:

Quote
Just a friendly suggestion form a DA member from an independent, why don't you use your party colors? Dark Khaki. As well as your slogan, "Power to the Regions". And maybe display the flag of the Dirty South map of the regions.

Just a suggestion. :)


()



i actually like this logo.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on July 11, 2009, 02:54:40 PM
I probably shouldn't make logos for parties I'm not a member of, but I made one just for fun anyway. :P

Combination of Isaac's logo and this:

Quote
Just a friendly suggestion form a DA member from an independent, why don't you use your party colors? Dark Khaki. As well as your slogan, "Power to the Regions". And maybe display the flag of the Dirty South map of the regions.

Just a suggestion. :)


()



i actually like this logo.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: big bad fab on July 11, 2009, 03:24:34 PM
Yeah, fine.
A good logo as it's an idea put into an image.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: RIP Robert H Bork on July 11, 2009, 04:10:40 PM
I probably shouldn't make logos for parties I'm not a member of, but I made one just for fun anyway. :P

Combination of Isaac's logo and this:

Quote
Just a friendly suggestion form a DA member from an independent, why don't you use your party colors? Dark Khaki. As well as your slogan, "Power to the Regions". And maybe display the flag of the Dirty South map of the regions.

Just a suggestion. :)


()



Excellent. Now just add "Power to the Regions" under the RPP text.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on July 11, 2009, 04:16:50 PM
Is there anyway you could scale that down? For the sake of the introduction thread.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese on July 11, 2009, 04:38:15 PM
Here you go guys

()

()


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on July 11, 2009, 11:38:28 PM
I oppose that logan. Not only did a DA member create it, but it's way too loud and way too much going on in it. Do we really need five flags in one logo? It's tacky.

My main gripe is that a DA member made it. I appreciate his input, but how would it look if we had to have another party member make it?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on July 11, 2009, 11:39:25 PM
I oppose that logan. Not only did a DA member create it, but it's way too loud and way too much going on in it. Do we really need five flags in one logo? It's tacky.

My main gripe is that a DA member made it. I appreciate his input, but how would it look if we had to have another party member make it?

Can't we all just get along? No need for partisanship over a logo.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: ilikeverin on July 11, 2009, 11:40:25 PM
I oppose that logan. Not only did a DA member create it, but it's way too loud and way too much going on in it. Do we really need five flags in one logo? It's tacky.

My main gripe is that a DA member made it. I appreciate his input, but how would it look if we had to have another party member make it?

...who cares?  I may not be an RPP member, but I know a good logo when I see it.  And that's a good one.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on July 11, 2009, 11:42:56 PM
I like the logo, but I feel the flag of the Dirty South should show the most prominence


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on July 11, 2009, 11:45:32 PM
I oppose that logan. Not only did a DA member create it, but it's way too loud and way too much going on in it. Do we really need five flags in one logo? It's tacky.

My main gripe is that a DA member made it. I appreciate his input, but how would it look if we had to have another party member make it?

Well it could be worse, at least it doesn't have a Swastika on it like the last non-party member suggested. Last time I checked I though we would have a vote on the matter anyway, and yours is I beleive still I contender, if you wish to pursue.

I oppose that logan. Not only did a DA member create it, but it's way too loud and way too much going on in it. Do we really need five flags in one logo? It's tacky.

My main gripe is that a DA member made it. I appreciate his input, but how would it look if we had to have another party member make it?

Can't we all just get along? No need for partisanship over a logo.

Is there ever a time a DA member isn't proposing a compromise to something jeeze. Oh yea I remember now, but I promised never to mention that one in public again, something about it being confrontational, :P.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on July 11, 2009, 11:48:21 PM
I oppose that logan. Not only did a DA member create it, but it's way too loud and way too much going on in it. Do we really need five flags in one logo? It's tacky.

My main gripe is that a DA member made it. I appreciate his input, but how would it look if we had to have another party member make it?

Can't we all just get along? No need for partisanship over a logo.

Is there ever a time a DA member isn't proposing a compromise to something jeeze. Oh yea I remember now, but I promised never to mention that one in public again, something about it being confrontational, :P.

We do our best to promote unity and progress. I think my work on that stimulus bill compromise was pretty handy. Kept you and Marokai from coming to blows on the floor of the Senate. We don't need a Sumner moment.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on July 11, 2009, 11:52:40 PM
I oppose that logan. Not only did a DA member create it, but it's way too loud and way too much going on in it. Do we really need five flags in one logo? It's tacky.

My main gripe is that a DA member made it. I appreciate his input, but how would it look if we had to have another party member make it?

Can't we all just get along? No need for partisanship over a logo.

Is there ever a time a DA member isn't proposing a compromise to something jeeze. Oh yea I remember now, but I promised never to mention that one in public again, something about it being confrontational, :P.

We do our best to promote unity and progress. I think my work on that stimulus bill compromise was pretty handy. Kept you and Marokai from coming to blows on the floor of the Senate. We don't need a Sumner moment.

Yes and you have just helped me make my decision as to what to do with my amendment on that bill, :P.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: RIP Robert H Bork on July 12, 2009, 12:22:50 AM
I oppose that logan. Not only did a DA member create it, but it's way too loud and way too much going on in it. Do we really need five flags in one logo? It's tacky.

My main gripe is that a DA member made it. I appreciate his input, but how would it look if we had to have another party member make it?

...who cares?  I may not be an RPP member, but I know a good logo when I see it.  And that's a good one.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Brandon H on July 12, 2009, 10:55:30 AM
I think I would make "Regional Protection Party" a little smaller, but overall I like the concept with the star and the regional flags.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on July 12, 2009, 12:49:59 PM
As chairman I now going to asset my powers BWAHAHAHAHAHA

Sorry needed to do that

All logo submissions must be made by 0900 hours on Tuesday and I will open up a booth Tuesday night through the weekend for a vote


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on July 12, 2009, 01:04:00 PM
My submission:
()


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese on July 13, 2009, 08:14:29 AM
Bump

Since people seemed to like it, I'll submit my logo as well.

()

()


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on July 13, 2009, 09:23:26 PM
I'm not going back and looking it up, but it's on page 52 of this thread. No need to repost it.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on July 13, 2009, 09:32:04 PM
I think this is what the lazy guy from Charleston is reffering too.

I want to post this so everyone can see it. We have been in the process of creating an official RPP logo. I did this mockup last night and I need feedback from more than just a few people.

()

Let me know what you'd like to see changed, if anything. Please nothing too complicated. I know someone wanted the star through the hole on the P, but that would take me a good three hours to do, and I haven't the patience to do it on an unpaid project.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on July 13, 2009, 09:35:44 PM

Hell yeah we do.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on July 13, 2009, 09:50:03 PM
My submission:

()


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fritz on July 13, 2009, 10:03:36 PM
Okay, it was funny the first time.  Now you're overdoing it.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on July 13, 2009, 10:09:22 PM

     The trolling is still not appreciated.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on July 13, 2009, 10:14:53 PM
Can we just get this sick, insensitive F**k banned already? >:(


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on July 13, 2009, 10:15:31 PM
Okay, it was funny the first time.  Now you're overdoing it.
Yeah, I will stop.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on July 13, 2009, 10:17:12 PM
Can we just get this sick, insensitive F**k banned already? >:(

Would have been nice if people voted for my libel/slander act.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on July 13, 2009, 10:19:38 PM
Can we just get this sick, insensitive F**k banned already? >:(
That's not nice.

You sick, insensitive F**k. >:(


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on July 13, 2009, 10:20:48 PM
Can we just get this sick, insensitive F**k banned already? >:(

Would have been nice if people voted for my libel/slander act.

I wasn't in the Senate at that time. My fear at the time was my occasional outbursts might constantly land me in court thus my opposition in my campaign. :P.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Devilman88 on July 13, 2009, 10:42:35 PM
My submission:

()


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on July 13, 2009, 10:53:33 PM
I like mine because it was designed on a Mac.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: RIP Robert H Bork on July 13, 2009, 10:55:58 PM
I like mine because it was designed on a Mac.

So if it were not designed on a Mac, you would dislike it?

That is a stupid reason.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on July 14, 2009, 09:04:22 AM
The RPP will be discussing senate details at greater length, but it is expected that RowanBrandon and SPC will be our nominees


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on July 14, 2009, 11:18:51 AM
All the bright red dots, clashing with the gold. It's hurting my eyes. :(
I'd like it more without all the dots and stuff around the name, just keep the big one. And maybe make the font bolder.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Meeker on July 14, 2009, 06:35:21 PM
I like mine because it was designed on a Mac.

^^^

This is the most convincing reason I've heard.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on July 17, 2009, 10:30:57 AM
Alright, with DS legislature likely to pass, we have to decide who, besides myself, our candidates will be


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: SPC on July 17, 2009, 10:36:23 AM
Alright, with DS legislature likely to pass, we have to decide who, besides myself, our candidates will be

Since we have a stronghold on the region, we don't we just permit several of our candidates to run for competitive elections?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on July 17, 2009, 10:39:48 AM
Alright, with DS legislature likely to pass, we have to decide who, besides myself, our candidates will be

Since we have a stronghold on the region, we don't we just permit several of our candidates to run for competitive elections?
We certainly could, but I think other parties should be welcomed as well.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on July 17, 2009, 10:57:40 AM
Alright, with DS legislature likely to pass, we have to decide who, besides myself, our candidates will be

Since we have a stronghold on the region, we don't we just permit several of our candidates to run for competitive elections?
We certainly could, but I think other parties should be welcomed as well.

Why not leave it as a competitive and open election? Regional legislature elections are the closest things we have to primaries as assemblymen tend to use the experience and recognition gained in the regional bodies to eventually run for higher office.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on July 17, 2009, 11:19:51 AM
Alright, with DS legislature likely to pass, we have to decide who, besides myself, our candidates will be

You mean the Supreme Soviet? ;D


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on July 17, 2009, 11:24:55 AM
Alright, with DS legislature likely to pass, we have to decide who, besides myself, our candidates will be

Since we have a stronghold on the region, we don't we just permit several of our candidates to run for competitive elections?
We certainly could, but I think other parties should be welcomed as well.

Why not leave it as a competitive and open election? Regional legislature elections are the closest things we have to primaries as assemblymen tend to use the experience and recognition gained in the regional bodies to eventually run for higher office.
I think that may be a good idea, but I also don't think having a legislature made up of 3 RPP members (which more than likely would happen) as a good idea


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on July 17, 2009, 11:29:57 AM
Alright, with DS legislature likely to pass, we have to decide who, besides myself, our candidates will be

Since we have a stronghold on the region, we don't we just permit several of our candidates to run for competitive elections?
We certainly could, but I think other parties should be welcomed as well.

Why not leave it as a competitive and open election? Regional legislature elections are the closest things we have to primaries as assemblymen tend to use the experience and recognition gained in the regional bodies to eventually run for higher office.
I think that may be a good idea, but I also don't think having a legislature made up of 3 RPP members (which more than likely would happen) as a good idea

I would agree, but hopefully the region will be willing to elect someone that is outside the party. Regional politics is always slightly different than party affiliation.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on July 17, 2009, 11:33:48 AM
Yes, but with approval voting all we have to do is run 3 candidates, approve of them and no one else, and we win


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on July 17, 2009, 11:36:45 AM
Please do elections the good old Corsican/Sardinian way, please.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on July 17, 2009, 09:55:35 PM
     If there are more than three candidates, everyone blindly approving of all could have interesting consequences.

     Anyway, I have every intention of running for the legislature.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Devilman88 on July 18, 2009, 03:19:46 PM
If I can I will run too.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on July 18, 2009, 03:40:07 PM
Did you move from the Mideast?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on July 18, 2009, 03:58:39 PM

     Yeah, he's now a North Carolinian in Atlasia too.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Devilman88 on July 18, 2009, 07:05:16 PM

Yes sir I did.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on July 26, 2009, 02:25:56 PM
BUMP

Not really sure why I didn't include the quote in this bump


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Mechaman on July 26, 2009, 02:28:36 PM
All the bright red dots, clashing with the gold. It's hurting my eyes. :(
I'd like it more without all the dots and stuff around the name, just keep the big one. And maybe make the font bolder.

Looks too "Focus on the Family"-ish.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on July 26, 2009, 09:59:49 PM
At this time, the party officially endorses SPC and RowanBrandon, however, the party has not come to a consensus on a 3rd preference, or if the party will pick one at all.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Vepres on July 26, 2009, 10:43:27 PM
I think Purple State deserves the third preference endorsement. He's been pro-region on a number of issues, and he is generally willing to compromise with us.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on July 26, 2009, 10:45:40 PM
I think Purple State deserves the third preference endorsement. He's been pro-region on a number of issues, and he is generally willing to compromise with us.

He's generally willing to compromise on anything and everything. He's our own Stephen Douglas.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on July 26, 2009, 10:46:42 PM
I think Purple State deserves the third preference endorsement. He's been pro-region on a number of issues, and he is generally willing to compromise with us.

I am pro-region.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on July 26, 2009, 10:49:45 PM
I think Purple State deserves the third preference endorsement. He's been pro-region on a number of issues, and he is generally willing to compromise with us.

Of course. He helped us hold DWTL's seat back in June..... oh wait. I hope the JCP supports him in the general this time.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on July 26, 2009, 10:53:20 PM
I think Purple State deserves the third preference endorsement. He's been pro-region on a number of issues, and he is generally willing to compromise with us.

I am pro-region.

In what manner?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on July 26, 2009, 10:57:08 PM
I think Purple State deserves the third preference endorsement. He's been pro-region on a number of issues, and he is generally willing to compromise with us.

Stunner. ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on July 26, 2009, 10:58:01 PM
I think Purple State deserves the third preference endorsement. He's been pro-region on a number of issues, and he is generally willing to compromise with us.

Of course. He helped us hold DWTL's seat back in June..... oh wait. I hope the JCP supports him in the general this time.

     I agree with this. The actions of both him & Hashemite at that juncture were disappointing to the utmost. For that matter, Franzl & afleitch happily enabled their cloak & dagger actions. For some reason I am not interested in seeing any of them win re-election.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on July 26, 2009, 11:01:51 PM
I think Purple State deserves the third preference endorsement. He's been pro-region on a number of issues, and he is generally willing to compromise with us.

Of course. He helped us hold DWTL's seat back in June..... oh wait. I hope the JCP supports him in the general this time.

     I agree with this. The actions of both him & Hashemite at that juncture were disappointing to the utmost. For that matter, Franzl & afleitch happily enabled their cloak & dagger actions. For some reason I am not interested in seeing any of them win re-election.

Forgive me for speaking on behalf of the DA or in their defense, but I thought the point of the DA was pragmatism and following, for the most part, individual ideologies that are only loosely connected with each other? (Socially liberal, for instance.) The idea, or the expectation, that the DA should fall lockstep in line with someone else sort of, in my view, goes against what I thought the Democratic Alliance stood for, and I'd be sorely disappointed if I saw them start rallying consistently behind RPP candidates, especially.

In short what I'm trying to say is that you shouldn't expect the DA to fall in lockstep over Senate candidates, expecting that is unrealistic and I think hurts what the Democratic Alliance is.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on July 26, 2009, 11:04:25 PM
I think Purple State deserves the third preference endorsement. He's been pro-region on a number of issues, and he is generally willing to compromise with us.

Of course. He helped us hold DWTL's seat back in June..... oh wait. I hope the JCP supports him in the general this time.

     I agree with this. The actions of both him & Hashemite at that juncture were disappointing to the utmost. For that matter, Franzl & afleitch happily enabled their cloak & dagger actions. For some reason I am not interested in seeing any of them win re-election.

I personally think you misrepresented the position of the DA to the RPP. Marokai was a more active member who contributed a great deal to this game. Duke seemed to provide an ultimatum: either vote me in and I'll be active for once or vote against me and I'll disappear forever.

I vote for who I believe has the most to contribute to the game. In that election it was Marokai. In the next it was DWTL over Fritz. It is against my nature to assume that my support for any one group is unwavering. The RPP has my support when it is appropriate, but not unconditionally.

I believe my credentials, both pro-region and in working with RPP members like NCYank on GM reform, show my true colors. It is up to your membership to decide if that is something you support.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on July 26, 2009, 11:07:10 PM
I think Purple State deserves the third preference endorsement. He's been pro-region on a number of issues, and he is generally willing to compromise with us.

Of course. He helped us hold DWTL's seat back in June..... oh wait. I hope the JCP supports him in the general this time.

     I agree with this. The actions of both him & Hashemite at that juncture were disappointing to the utmost. For that matter, Franzl & afleitch happily enabled their cloak & dagger actions. For some reason I am not interested in seeing any of them win re-election.

Forgive me for speaking on behalf of the DA or in their defense, but I thought the point of the DA was pragmatism and following, for the most part, individual ideologies that are only loosely connected with each other? (Socially liberal, for instance.) The idea, or the expectation, that the DA should fall lockstep in line with someone else sort of, in my view, goes against what I thought the Democratic Alliance stood for, and I'd be sorely disappointed if I saw them start rallying consistently behind RPP candidates, especially.

In short what I'm trying to say is that you shouldn't expect the DA to fall in lockstep over Senate candidates, expecting that is unrealistic and I think hurts what the Democratic Alliance is.

     I'm guessing you don't know about the reports we received that Hashemite & Purple State leaned heavily on all DAers to vote for you (which came as a disappointment considering Duke's strong personal ties to a number of them, which he had been promised would translate into the bulk of their votes).


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on July 26, 2009, 11:10:43 PM
I think Purple State deserves the third preference endorsement. He's been pro-region on a number of issues, and he is generally willing to compromise with us.

Of course. He helped us hold DWTL's seat back in June..... oh wait. I hope the JCP supports him in the general this time.

     I agree with this. The actions of both him & Hashemite at that juncture were disappointing to the utmost. For that matter, Franzl & afleitch happily enabled their cloak & dagger actions. For some reason I am not interested in seeing any of them win re-election.

I personally think you misrepresented the position of the DA to the RPP. Marokai was a more active member who contributed a great deal to this game. Duke seemed to provide an ultimatum: either vote me in and I'll be active for once or vote against me and I'll disappear forever.

I vote for who I believe has the most to contribute to the game. In that election it was Marokai. In the next it was DWTL over Fritz. It is against my nature to assume that my support for any one group is unwavering. The RPP has my support when it is appropriate, but not unconditionally.

I believe my credentials, both pro-region and in working with RPP members like NCYank on GM reform, show my true colors. It is up to your membership to decide if that is something you support.

     This has nothing to do with what I said. I heard that you & Hashemite engineered a plot to have the DA to fall in line behind Marokai (despite the inconclusive results of the endorsement vote). Everything that I heard & saw at that time seems to strongly back up that theory. I don't appreciate that, just a heads up. ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Countess Anya of the North Parish on July 26, 2009, 11:11:17 PM
I think Purple State deserves the third preference endorsement. He's been pro-region on a number of issues, and he is generally willing to compromise with us.

Of course. He helped us hold DWTL's seat back in June..... oh wait. I hope the JCP supports him in the general this time.

     I agree with this. The actions of both him & Hashemite at that juncture were disappointing to the utmost. For that matter, Franzl & afleitch happily enabled their cloak & dagger actions. For some reason I am not interested in seeing any of them win re-election.

Forgive me for speaking on behalf of the DA or in their defense, but I thought the point of the DA was pragmatism and following, for the most part, individual ideologies that are only loosely connected with each other? (Socially liberal, for instance.) The idea, or the expectation, that the DA should fall lockstep in line with someone else sort of, in my view, goes against what I thought the Democratic Alliance stood for, and I'd be sorely disappointed if I saw them start rallying consistently behind RPP candidates, especially.

In short what I'm trying to say is that you shouldn't expect the DA to fall in lockstep over Senate candidates, expecting that is unrealistic and I think hurts what the Democratic Alliance is.

     I'm guessing you don't know about the reports we received that Hashemite & Purple State leaned heavily on all DAers to vote for you (which came as a disappointment considering Duke's strong personal ties to a number of them, which he had been promised would translate into the bulk of their votes).
keep in mind this is an online game. And you should not rely on someone just cause of the personal ties. You are asking people to vote for someone cause of what they stand for and how active they are. not personal ties.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Vepres on July 26, 2009, 11:12:46 PM
Perhaps I'm not as loyal to my party as my fellow RPPers, but I personally would love to see both afleitch and Purple State reelected (assuming, of course, that Ronan and/or SPC win too).

Look, as much as I'd have loved to see Duke win, I have a great deal of respect for independently-minded people, and so I cannot hate them for not backing him.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on July 26, 2009, 11:17:02 PM
Perhaps I'm not as loyal to my party as my fellow RPPers, but I personally would love to see both afleitch and Purple State reelected (assuming, of course, that Ronan and/or SPC win too).

Look, as much as I'd have loved to see Duke win, I have a great deal of respect for independently-minded people, and so I cannot hate them for not backing him.


     I don't take issue with them for that. I take issue with them for going out & leaning on all their party members to vote for a candidate that they had not even endorsed.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Countess Anya of the North Parish on July 26, 2009, 11:18:37 PM
Perhaps I'm not as loyal to my party as my fellow RPPers, but I personally would love to see both afleitch and Purple State reelected (assuming, of course, that Ronan and/or SPC win too).

Look, as much as I'd have loved to see Duke win, I have a great deal of respect for independently-minded people, and so I cannot hate them for not backing him.


     I don't take issue with them for that. I take issue with them for going out & leaning on all their party members to vote for a candidate that they had not even endorsed.

It does not matter if a party does not endorse a candidate. They just voted. get over it.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on July 26, 2009, 11:21:14 PM
PiT, I think you believe that Hashemite and I attempt to influence our members' votes far more than we actually do. All I do is announce my endorsement. I don't think I have ever "leaned heavily" on a member to produce a certain vote.

In the DA, we promote loose affiliation. The leaders make our opinions known, but individual members are free to think and act as they wish. This is why there is room for people at every end of the political spectrum in the party. It is also why you may have been disappointed with some of the election results. I endorse Marokai there, DWTL here. I am not a member of either the RPP or the JCP, so I am not committed to supporting one party 100% of the time.

I am sorry if the DA has been misrepresented, but let me be clear: The DA does not hold sway over its members in the way that the RPP and JCP influence their own membership. We like everyone to be informed through announcements and endorsements, but what you see in public is what is actually happening.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on July 26, 2009, 11:28:09 PM
PiT, I think you believe that Hashemite and I attempt to influence our members' votes far more than we actually do. All I do is announce my endorsement. I don't think I have ever "leaned heavily" on a member to produce a certain vote.

In the DA, we promote loose affiliation. The leaders make our opinions known, but individual members are free to think and act as they wish. This is why there is room for people at every end of the political spectrum in the party. It is also why you may have been disappointed with some of the election results. I endorse Marokai there, DWTL here. I am not a member of either the RPP or the JCP, so I am not committed to supporting one party 100% of the time.

I am sorry if the DA has been misrepresented, but let me be clear: The DA does not hold sway over its members in the way that the RPP and JCP influence their own membership. We like everyone to be informed through announcements and endorsements, but what you see in public is what is actually happening.


     I heard reports that two members of the DA (who shall go unnamed for their protection) had said that they were pressured into voting a particular way. Duke said that several members had promised him their support, but they then preferenced him third only hours later.

     Maybe I remember incorrectly or maybe I was misinformed somewhere down the line, but understand my misgivings.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on July 26, 2009, 11:33:58 PM
I think Purple State deserves the third preference endorsement. He's been pro-region on a number of issues, and he is generally willing to compromise with us.

I am pro-region.

In what manner?
'

I support the Midwest's right to have a silly name.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on July 26, 2009, 11:38:38 PM
PiT, I think you believe that Hashemite and I attempt to influence our members' votes far more than we actually do. All I do is announce my endorsement. I don't think I have ever "leaned heavily" on a member to produce a certain vote.

In the DA, we promote loose affiliation. The leaders make our opinions known, but individual members are free to think and act as they wish. This is why there is room for people at every end of the political spectrum in the party. It is also why you may have been disappointed with some of the election results. I endorse Marokai there, DWTL here. I am not a member of either the RPP or the JCP, so I am not committed to supporting one party 100% of the time.

I am sorry if the DA has been misrepresented, but let me be clear: The DA does not hold sway over its members in the way that the RPP and JCP influence their own membership. We like everyone to be informed through announcements and endorsements, but what you see in public is what is actually happening.


     I heard reports that two members of the DA (who shall go unnamed for their protection) were pressured into voting a particular way. Duke said that several members had promised him their support, but they then preferenced him third only hours later.

     Maybe I remember incorrectly or maybe I was misinformed somewhere down the line, but understand my misgivings.

I understand both your misgivings and your frustration, but I will say for all to see that I have never pressured a member, DA or otherwise, into voting the way I wanted them to. That is the true message of the DA. I know it is hard to imagine, as the major parties in Atlasia are quite expert at simply providing ballots to their voters and mobilizing them as the leadership chooses, but I do not function in that way. I do not mobilize members, I do not pressure members.

I can't speak for everyone in my party. Nor can I say that members of other parties did not successfully lobby DA members. We have a variance of ideologies, stances and beliefs and are open to members bucking party line. Understand that the DA is a new sort of party and we hold that very dear. The conventional wisdom does not hold with me.

Like last election, I do seek the endorsement of the RPP. My credentials speak for themselves. I believe it is a mistake to let rumors and conventional assumptions hold you back from voting according to your beliefs, but that is up to you and your membership.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on July 27, 2009, 12:23:41 AM
I think Purple State deserves the third preference endorsement. He's been pro-region on a number of issues, and he is generally willing to compromise with us.

I am pro-region.

In what manner?
'

I support the Midwest's right to have a silly name.

You, sir, are a good man.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on July 27, 2009, 06:22:16 AM
PiT really ought to get better sources.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: afleitch on July 27, 2009, 07:10:57 AM
Right to cut through this -

On the matter of the Fritz vote, recall that DWTL had only recently returned after a period of absence which had resulted in him loosing his Senate seat. There was always going to be a reluctance to re-elect him after such a short period of time; a period of absense can be beneficial. There was no co-ordinated effort to ensure that the DA voted one way or the other; remember that in the Presidential race we split between both candidates and without that the race wouldn't have been close.

Secondly, I see no harm in stressing my record :) If the RPP is about economic conservatism then I would ask you to remember I've cut tax twice in two bills and I hope to do so for a third time. If it's about regionalism, then to my knowledge I'm the only Senator who has specifically mentioned the regions in two bills; the first given them control over the SEDZ's and secondly through an amendment to the Health Care bill to give region based boards control over health spending and prioritising.

If these things matter, then I hope you would consider giving me a little of your support.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on July 27, 2009, 10:22:27 AM
For references, let us just how friendly Afleitch was to the RPP in the last election:

[1] Afleitch
[2] Franzl
[3] Purple State
[4] Bacon King
[5] Lief
[6] SPC
[7] DWTL

7 candidates, our 2 preferenced last behind a lot of liberal candidates.  How conservative of him.  Guys, it seems like every election cycle he comes to us claiming to a "conservative" and wanting to work with our party.  Yet every time its a load of empty promises that he does not keep.  I must admit that many times I have taken him up on his offer and tried to work with him, but every time he works as hard as possible to screw our party, not even for the benefit of his party, for the benefits of those who truly hate our party like Al and Earl.  If we 3rd preference anyone, it has to be Franzl or PurpleState


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on July 27, 2009, 10:28:48 AM
PiT, I think you believe that Hashemite and I attempt to influence our members' votes far more than we actually do. All I do is announce my endorsement. I don't think I have ever "leaned heavily" on a member to produce a certain vote.

In the DA, we promote loose affiliation. The leaders make our opinions known, but individual members are free to think and act as they wish. This is why there is room for people at every end of the political spectrum in the party. It is also why you may have been disappointed with some of the election results. I endorse Marokai there, DWTL here. I am not a member of either the RPP or the JCP, so I am not committed to supporting one party 100% of the time.

I am sorry if the DA has been misrepresented, but let me be clear: The DA does not hold sway over its members in the way that the RPP and JCP influence their own membership. We like everyone to be informed through announcements and endorsements, but what you see in public is what is actually happening.


     I heard reports that two members of the DA (who shall go unnamed for their protection) had said that they were pressured into voting a particular way. Duke said that several members had promised him their support, but they then preferenced him third only hours later.

     Maybe I remember incorrectly or maybe I was misinformed somewhere down the line, but understand my misgivings.

Correct. This is water under the bridge now, but I was informed by two DA members that they were pushed hard to vote Marokai ahead of me. The others that voted to endorse me at the convention gave into the demands. It is really hard for PS to claim otherwise. It was hardly as simple as "I announced my endorsement and that was that." If you had noticed, you did that and I still had the most votes during the convention after your announcement. It was when the voting booth opened that I began getting third preferences from nearly all of them sans a few loyal folks.

All I am saying is that you may work with us, and that is true, but only when you expect us to get you reelected. So all I am saying is that I hope the JCP is kind to you, because you certainly stuck your neck out there for them back in June.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: afleitch on July 27, 2009, 10:45:15 AM
For references, let us just how friendly Afleitch was to the RPP in the last election:

[1] Afleitch
[2] Franzl
[3] Purple State
[4] Bacon King
[5] Lief
[6] SPC
[7] DWTL

7 candidates, our 2 preferenced last behind a lot of liberal candidates.  How conservative of him.  Guys, it seems like every election cycle he comes to us claiming to a "conservative" and wanting to work with our party.  Yet every time its a load of empty promises that he does not keep.  I must admit that many times I have taken him up on his offer and tried to work with him, but every time he works as hard as possible to screw our party, not even for the benefit of his party, for the benefits of those who truly hate our party like Al and Earl.  If we 3rd preference anyone, it has to be Franzl or PurpleState

Remember that this vote came on the back of not being endorsed by the RPP despite campaigning to do so. I don't see a 'backlash' at that time as entirely unreasonable. I also voted for PiT in the presidential race, which was the 'last election' (federally) that I voted in!

For the record, what were PS and Franzls votes in that election?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Vepres on July 27, 2009, 10:50:21 AM
My party is doing an excellent job of alienating moderates, keep  up the good work. We'll win two seats now for sure. ::)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on July 27, 2009, 10:52:28 AM
My party is doing an excellent job of alienating moderates, keep it up the good work. We'll win two seats now for sure. ::)

That's what it was designed to do, don't you know?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on July 27, 2009, 11:52:03 AM
PiT, I think you believe that Hashemite and I attempt to influence our members' votes far more than we actually do. All I do is announce my endorsement. I don't think I have ever "leaned heavily" on a member to produce a certain vote.

In the DA, we promote loose affiliation. The leaders make our opinions known, but individual members are free to think and act as they wish. This is why there is room for people at every end of the political spectrum in the party. It is also why you may have been disappointed with some of the election results. I endorse Marokai there, DWTL here. I am not a member of either the RPP or the JCP, so I am not committed to supporting one party 100% of the time.

I am sorry if the DA has been misrepresented, but let me be clear: The DA does not hold sway over its members in the way that the RPP and JCP influence their own membership. We like everyone to be informed through announcements and endorsements, but what you see in public is what is actually happening.


     I heard reports that two members of the DA (who shall go unnamed for their protection) had said that they were pressured into voting a particular way. Duke said that several members had promised him their support, but they then preferenced him third only hours later.

     Maybe I remember incorrectly or maybe I was misinformed somewhere down the line, but understand my misgivings.

Correct. This is water under the bridge now, but I was informed by two DA members that they were pushed hard to vote Marokai ahead of me. The others that voted to endorse me at the convention gave into the demands. It is really hard for PS to claim otherwise. It was hardly as simple as "I announced my endorsement and that was that." If you had noticed, you did that and I still had the most votes during the convention after your announcement. It was when the voting booth opened that I began getting third preferences from nearly all of them sans a few loyal folks.

All I am saying is that you may work with us, and that is true, but only when you expect us to get you reelected. So all I am saying is that I hope the JCP is kind to you, because you certainly stuck your neck out there for them back in June.

Are you saying that I am lying? I have stated and will state again that never have I pressured a member of the DA to vote in any specific way. I announce my endorsement, I vote in the public polls and make my opinion known, but I reject party leaders leaning on members to vote as the leaders want.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on July 27, 2009, 12:18:50 PM
PiT, I think you believe that Hashemite and I attempt to influence our members' votes far more than we actually do. All I do is announce my endorsement. I don't think I have ever "leaned heavily" on a member to produce a certain vote.

In the DA, we promote loose affiliation. The leaders make our opinions known, but individual members are free to think and act as they wish. This is why there is room for people at every end of the political spectrum in the party. It is also why you may have been disappointed with some of the election results. I endorse Marokai there, DWTL here. I am not a member of either the RPP or the JCP, so I am not committed to supporting one party 100% of the time.

I am sorry if the DA has been misrepresented, but let me be clear: The DA does not hold sway over its members in the way that the RPP and JCP influence their own membership. We like everyone to be informed through announcements and endorsements, but what you see in public is what is actually happening.


     I heard reports that two members of the DA (who shall go unnamed for their protection) had said that they were pressured into voting a particular way. Duke said that several members had promised him their support, but they then preferenced him third only hours later.

     Maybe I remember incorrectly or maybe I was misinformed somewhere down the line, but understand my misgivings.

Correct. This is water under the bridge now, but I was informed by two DA members that they were pushed hard to vote Marokai ahead of me. The others that voted to endorse me at the convention gave into the demands. It is really hard for PS to claim otherwise. It was hardly as simple as "I announced my endorsement and that was that." If you had noticed, you did that and I still had the most votes during the convention after your announcement. It was when the voting booth opened that I began getting third preferences from nearly all of them sans a few loyal folks.

All I am saying is that you may work with us, and that is true, but only when you expect us to get you reelected. So all I am saying is that I hope the JCP is kind to you, because you certainly stuck your neck out there for them back in June.

Are you saying that I am lying? I have stated and will state again that never have I pressured a member of the DA to vote in any specific way. I announce my endorsement, I vote in the public polls and make my opinion known, but I reject party leaders leaning on members to vote as the leaders want.

I am not saying you are lying. I am simply stating what I was told by two of your party members. They said there was a lot of pressure applied behind the scenes to vote for Marokai over me. Your name was mentioned. It was strange that people who promised me second preferences behind Gustaf and others who voted for me in the convention AFTER you made your announcement suddenly voted for Marokai. I'm not saying you are lying. I am just calling it like I heard and saw. Either that, or Marokai played dirty like he did with Bayh and tried to throw the election by making some sort of promise. I have no proof or belief that happened because I heard otherwise.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on July 27, 2009, 04:59:39 PM
My endorsement may very well have been the impetus behind people changing their minds on a vote. I do hope my endorsements have some meaning and I will not deny that I ensured that there were no doubts on where I stood, but I did not privately or publicly pressure individual members of the DA to vote a specific way.

I would be happy to continue this discussion in greater detail in private. I just thought I should make it quite clear that, regardless of what some members of the RPP may think, I have been nothing but an honest broker with your party and Atlasians in general.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: afleitch on July 27, 2009, 05:35:42 PM
Oh.

On a lighter note, Happy 1st Birthday...whenever that is...I'm sure its in the next few weeks or so. Or it may have been! Hey ho!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on July 27, 2009, 05:41:45 PM
Oh.

On a lighter note, Happy 1st Birthday...whenever that is...I'm sure its in the next few weeks or so. Or it may have been! Hey ho!

     August 7th. Thanks for the birthday greetings, though. On a side note, yesterday would have been the SDP's 1st birthday, were it still around.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on July 28, 2009, 12:28:59 PM
Membership: 2
Trolls-and-or-Frauds: 2

lol

joke party

BUMP and a lolz


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: SPC on July 28, 2009, 12:33:55 PM
Funny that this may have been the event that changed Atlasian politics. I doubt anyone a year ago would have predicted a United Right, a United Left, and a United Center.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on July 28, 2009, 12:44:35 PM
Funny that this may have been the event that changed Atlasian politics. I doubt anyone a year ago would have predicted a United Right, a United Left, and a United Center.
I think Atlasian politics changes violenty and rapidly.  I don't know how long a unified left, right, and center can last.  The unified right should last awhile because we know how to run a party and accomedate all our members, the question is whether the other two can do the same.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on July 29, 2009, 09:01:07 AM
Statement on Statements

I forgot that I used to issue statements and I have stopped, so I now am issuing a statement to announce the return of statements.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on July 29, 2009, 02:33:20 PM
(
)

     Updated map showing where we have members. We now have 9 members in the Southeast, 7 in the Mideast, 7 in the Midwest, 5 in the Northeast, & 4 in the Pacific.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on July 29, 2009, 03:40:32 PM
We are becoming too spread out, as I noted we need to return to our DS roots more.  We've haven't recruited a member in the DS in an amount of time I cannot remember


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: President Mitt on July 29, 2009, 03:55:51 PM
(
)

     Updated map showing where we have members. We now have 9 members in the Southeast, 7 in the Mideast, 7 in the Midwest, 5 in the Northeast, & 4 in the Pacific.


Add another one in the Mideast, my good man.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on July 29, 2009, 04:27:47 PM
(
)

     Updated map showing where we have members. We now have 9 members in the Southeast, 7 in the Mideast, 7 in the Midwest, 5 in the Northeast, & 4 in the Pacific.


Add another one in the Mideast, my good man.

     Yes, now it's 8 in the Mideast. :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on July 29, 2009, 04:30:02 PM
We are becoming too spread out, as I noted we need to return to our DS roots more.  We've haven't recruited a member in the DS in an amount of time I cannot remember


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on July 29, 2009, 04:39:53 PM
We are becoming too spread out, as I noted we need to return to our DS roots more.  We've haven't recruited a member in the DS in an amount of time I cannot remember

     I've been trying to say that for months now. What good is virtually owning a region if you don't use the chance to initiate new members? We've taken advantage of the opportunity with NC Yankee, Daniel Adams, & that's kind of it.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on July 29, 2009, 04:47:11 PM
What good is virtually owning a region...

You don't see anything wrong with this?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on July 29, 2009, 04:52:10 PM
What good is virtually owning a region...

You don't see anything wrong with this?
What's wrong with it?  The JCP owns the Pacific.  Just because you are jealous does not mean it is a bad thing.  Its not like states in America aren't dominated by one party at times.  We certainly welcome all to participate and the minority sometimes has their way (see the assembly defeat for now).  We certainly could have done things like removed Dibble from magistrate, but we didn't do that because that would have been absurd.  Other than keeping the Governor's Plantation and the senate seat, our domination isn't something sinister


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on July 29, 2009, 04:59:07 PM
You didn't do that because you couldn't. Don't lie.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on July 29, 2009, 05:03:03 PM
You didn't do that because you couldn't. Don't lie.
No, we honestly could have removed Dibble and it was floated around as an idea when we first took control.  However, we felt it would not have been in our best interest and he did not do anything to deserve the ax. 

We could simply recalled him with 6 RPP signatures and a simply majority vote.  Duke also could have appointed someone new to be approved by the voters at the next election.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on July 30, 2009, 09:05:08 AM
Appointment of Dean

I just realized that I had never officially appointed a "party dean".  According to our posted by-laws, the dean of the party is responsible for settling a dispute that arises between the chair and the vice-chair.  It is with great honor that I formally appoint, in public, BrandonH as the dean of the RPP.



Re-Appointment of Regional Chairs

As per my job as chairman, I am required to appoint regional chairs to help with recruiting in GOTV efforts in each region.  Since there has been some confusion as to who chairs what region, I would like to formally reappoint all our regional chairs:

Northeast: RowanBrandon
Mideast: Tmthforu94
Midwest: dead0man
Pacific: Ronnie
Southeast: Daniel Adams


If any of these regional chairs feel that someone better would be suited for the job, feel free to post so or let me know in a PM so I can get a new regional chair.  It is important to our growth as a party that we continue to spread across every region


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 02, 2009, 07:49:45 PM
Statement on Pacific Lt. Gov. Race

The RPP offers it full endorsement to Alexander Hamilton in his bid for Lt. Gov.



Statement on Free Trade Agreements

The RPP supports any and all free trade agreements much to the chagrin of Fmr. Gov. BenConstine


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 03, 2009, 11:38:14 AM
One year anniversary party on Friday!!  We will be celebrating I'm just not sure how :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on August 03, 2009, 05:48:18 PM
One year anniversary party on Friday!!  We will be celebrating I'm just not sure how :)

A lot of anniversaries are coming up. On Wednesday it will be One year since I decided to darken the halls of the forum.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 03, 2009, 05:52:14 PM
One year anniversary party on Friday!!  We will be celebrating I'm just not sure how :)

A lot of anniversaries are coming up. On Wednesday it will be One year since I decided to darken the halls of the forum.
Come to think of it, today is 3 yrs since I did the same :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 07, 2009, 03:39:40 PM
Statement from The Chairman

While it may not have seemed like a long-term venture at the time, the party that myself, Duke, and SPC founded has turned one year old today.  It has not always been easy, and perhaps the beginning was the toughest, but we have climbed a lot of hurdles and showed once again that conservatives can have a voice in Atlasia.  There is still plenty of work to be done, but as we enter our second year, we are truly a nationwide party with a prescene in every region.  What seemed like a short-term fling has turned into long-term success.  Thanks to all who have made this day possible.  And here is to a successful future :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 07, 2009, 03:40:28 PM
Congratulations to the RPP!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on August 07, 2009, 06:11:17 PM


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 07, 2009, 06:15:10 PM


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: SPC on August 08, 2009, 02:21:12 AM


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on August 08, 2009, 04:32:42 PM
I can safely say that no one expected this renegade party created out of a crisis to last this long, much less be one of the largest parties in Atlasia. This is a wonderful accomplishment, and I thank all of our members for making the successes we have enjoyed possible throughout the past year.

Congratulations to us all, and he's to another year!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 09, 2009, 07:05:34 PM
RPP ENDORSED AUGUST BALLOT

1. RowanBrandon/SPC
2. SPC/RowanBrandon
3. PurpleState/Franzl
4. Franzl/PurpleState

I know its kind of early, but some of the party members seemed confused about the direction this party is headed in.  As always, this vote may affect future endorsements by the party


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on August 09, 2009, 07:59:50 PM
RPP ENDORSED AUGUST BALLOT

1. RowanBrandon/SPC
2. SPC/RowanBrandon
3. PurpleState/Franzl
4. Franzl/PurpleState

I know its kind of early, but some of the party members seemed confused about the direction this party is headed in.  As always, this vote may affect future endorsements by the party

Why did you not endorse me?



I am in the RPP.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 12, 2009, 08:20:23 AM
Do we have to issue regional endorsements?  I mean seriously I think everyone knows who we support in each election.  If anyone actually wants to have a vote on that stuff, I gave I am obligated by by-laws but seriously it would be a huge waste of time.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: big bad fab on August 12, 2009, 08:26:38 AM
Do we have to issue regional endorsements?  I mean seriously I think everyone knows who we support in each election.  If anyone actually wants to have a vote on that stuff, I gave I am obligated by by-laws but seriously it would be a huge waste of time.
I agree.
The more we organize internal debates on things not compulsory, the more there are attempts to divide the party or the more personal criteria and "stories" may prevail on idea and institutional behaviour.
And, anyways, the individual vote remains free.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 12, 2009, 08:30:29 AM
I agree with you Big Bad Fab, but that actually wasn't even what I was thinking about :)

Anyway, just vote for RPP candidates :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: big bad fab on August 12, 2009, 08:39:18 AM
I agree with you Big Bad Fab, but that actually wasn't even what I was thinking about :)
And you were thinking about... ?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 12, 2009, 11:45:21 AM
I agree with you Big Bad Fab, but that actually wasn't even what I was thinking about :)
And you were thinking about... ?
I was just thinking that it made no sense to endorse when every race is either unopposed or between an RPP candidate and a non-RPP candidate.  You did bring up an interesting point though


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 12, 2009, 12:28:51 PM
Anyone who needs any further evidence is why Afletich is a terrible, terrible senator please refer to the JCP convention


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Bacon King on August 12, 2009, 12:33:46 PM
Happy birthday guys, if a few days late. There's no opposition quite like y'all.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 13, 2009, 09:03:31 AM
Happy birthday guys, if a few days late. There's no opposition quite like y'all.
Well we are always welcome to your input and you have a lot more influence than you think :) (killed the assembly, cough, asshole :) )


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 16, 2009, 02:20:30 PM
Before I finalize voting plans, does anyone know our exact number of voters?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 16, 2009, 02:28:52 PM
Seven active members in my region.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: SPC on August 16, 2009, 03:52:57 PM
Before I finalize voting plans, does anyone know our exact number of voters?

40 total members, 30 active voters.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 18, 2009, 09:38:57 AM
I would like to encourage members of our party to consider all three of our candidates and choose wisely when voting.  The DA got 3 members in last time with a much smaller party.  All Duke has to do to win is outlast Afleitch and Franzl, he does not need to reach a quota


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 20, 2009, 05:15:52 PM
Scratch it, no official endorsements other than vote for our candidates


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 21, 2009, 06:01:09 PM
Its pretty much safe to stop voting for RB, there would need to be like 110 voters minimum for him to start having problems.  Start preffing SPC and Duke


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: afleitch on August 23, 2009, 09:41:49 AM
UPDATED ENDORSED BALLOT:

1. SPC
2. AHDuke
3. Franzl

That's the 'keep Afleitch out' ballot I presume?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on August 23, 2009, 09:51:15 AM
I'm still a member of this worthless goddamned party, aren't I?

Not that I know of.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on August 23, 2009, 09:56:02 AM
I'm still a member of this worthless goddamned party, aren't I?

Not that I know of.

As I recall, I registered with it. Unless you flushed it down your Judeo-Christian memory hole, I still am.

You're registered with the JCP, moron.

https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/JCP#Members


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on August 23, 2009, 10:06:56 AM
UPDATED ENDORSED BALLOT:

1. SPC
2. AHDuke
3. Franzl

That's the 'keep Afleitch out' ballot I presume?
Exactly, our goal now is elect SPC and then make sure if Duke fails short Franzl is in there. 

Right. And my goal is to make sure that SPC lives up to the "libertari" portion of his "libertarian" presumptions. If he doesn't legalize gay marriage, I'll smash his penis in.

Actually no marriage in Atlasia anymore. All couples, no matter sexual affiliation, can receive civil unions.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on August 23, 2009, 10:19:46 AM
How the heck does a person marry oneself?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on August 23, 2009, 10:22:56 AM

By saying it's so. Should there be anything else involved?

Sure you can say it. But that doesn't mean the government has to recognize it.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Peter on August 23, 2009, 12:28:32 PM
DWTL would like me to say that the RPP endorses the following ballot:

1. Franzl
2. Afleitch
3. Marokai Blue
4. Fritz

It is no longer necessary tp vote for Rowan Brandon as they think he already has enough votes to win.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Brandon H on August 23, 2009, 12:38:53 PM
DWTL would like me to say that the RPP endorses the following ballot:

1. Franzl
2. Afleitch
3. Marokai Blue
4. Fritz

It is no longer necessary tp vote for Rowan Brandon as they think he already has enough votes to win.

If anyone believes that, I suggest you slowly get up from your computer and walk away as the computer you are sitting in front of may be to complex of machine for you to operate properly.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fritz on August 23, 2009, 01:35:08 PM
Oh my, I'm getting an endorsement from the RPP?

Did I just see a pig fly past my window?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on August 23, 2009, 04:27:39 PM
DWTL would like me to say that the RPP endorses the following ballot:

1. Franzl
2. Afleitch
3. Marokai Blue
4. Fritz

It is no longer necessary tp vote for Rowan Brandon as they think he already has enough votes to win.

Little something you should know, there is more to the RPP then just DWTL.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 23, 2009, 04:28:43 PM
DWTL would like me to say that the RPP endorses the following ballot:

1. Franzl
2. Afleitch
3. Marokai Blue
4. Fritz

It is no longer necessary tp vote for Rowan Brandon as they think he already has enough votes to win.

Little something you should know, there is more to the RPP then just DWTL.
NC, i never said anything close to that


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Countess Anya of the North Parish on August 23, 2009, 04:29:23 PM
DWTL would like me to say that the RPP endorses the following ballot:

1. Franzl
2. Afleitch
3. Marokai Blue
4. Fritz

It is no longer necessary tp vote for Rowan Brandon as they think he already has enough votes to win.

Little something you should know, there is more to the RPP then just DWTL.

do i sense a power struggle?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Peter on August 23, 2009, 04:29:39 PM
You said somebody should tell everybody to vote Franzl. I did just that.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Franzl on August 23, 2009, 04:30:43 PM
You said somebody should tell everybody to vote Franzl. I did just that.

I have no problem with that ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MasterJedi on August 23, 2009, 04:35:32 PM
DWTL would like me to say that the RPP endorses the following ballot:

1. Franzl
2. Afleitch
3. Marokai Blue
4. Fritz

It is no longer necessary tp vote for Rowan Brandon as they think he already has enough votes to win.

Little something you should know, there is more to the RPP then just DWTL.

do i sense a power struggle?

lol


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on August 23, 2009, 04:53:54 PM
DWTL would like me to say that the RPP endorses the following ballot:

1. Franzl
2. Afleitch
3. Marokai Blue
4. Fritz

It is no longer necessary tp vote for Rowan Brandon as they think he already has enough votes to win.

Little something you should know, there is more to the RPP then just DWTL.
NC, i never said anything close to that

Oh pipe down off course you didn't say that. My point was that even if you did, it wouldn't affect the way the RPP votes.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 23, 2009, 10:57:34 PM
Oh well, so we probably will (once again) fall just short of getting a second seat.  Either way, great job guys and the focus can now shift to October where, I think, we certainly should be favorites to win the presidential election


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 23, 2009, 10:58:22 PM
Oh well, so we probably will (once again) fall just short of getting a second seat.  Either way, great job guys and the focus can now shift to October where, I think, we certainly should be favorites to win the presidential election

Among other electoral surprises.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Lief 🗽 on August 23, 2009, 11:19:43 PM
Oh well, so we probably will (once again) fall just short of getting a second seat.  Either way, great job guys and the focus can now shift to October where, I think, we certainly should be favorites to win the presidential election

oh?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 23, 2009, 11:20:45 PM
Oh well, so we probably will (once again) fall just short of getting a second seat.  Either way, great job guys and the focus can now shift to October where, I think, we certainly should be favorites to win the presidential election

oh?

Well, we did have more show up for us last time. Some just happened to get disqualified. And since then, we have expanded at a quicker pace.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 23, 2009, 11:22:34 PM
Oh well, so we probably will (once again) fall just short of getting a second seat.  Either way, great job guys and the focus can now shift to October where, I think, we certainly should be favorites to win the presidential election

oh?
Our party numbers are much larger than last time and I have a strong feeling this ticket is going to attract a lot of support


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on August 23, 2009, 11:23:44 PM
Oh well, so we probably will (once again) fall just short of getting a second seat.  Either way, great job guys and the focus can now shift to October where, I think, we certainly should be favorites to win the presidential election

oh?
Our party numbers are much larger than last time and I have a strong feeling this ticket is going to attract a lot of support

Just remember to keep an eye on other sites for potential recruits. :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 23, 2009, 11:27:46 PM
Oh well, so we probably will (once again) fall just short of getting a second seat.  Either way, great job guys and the focus can now shift to October where, I think, we certainly should be favorites to win the presidential election

oh?
Our party numbers are much larger than last time and I have a strong feeling this ticket is going to attract a lot of support

Just remember to keep an eye on other sites for potential recruits. :P

     You're just jealous because this ticket will be much stronger than the ticket that Lief ran against in June. ;D


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 23, 2009, 11:29:13 PM
Yeah at least this the VP is competent and not a liability :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 23, 2009, 11:31:19 PM
Yeah at least this the VP is competent and not a liability :)

Referring to when we supported bgwah, I agree. But last ticket had a great VP choice.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on August 23, 2009, 11:59:23 PM
Yeah at least this the VP is competent and not a liability :)

PiT only got the DA vote last time because HappyWarrior was on the ticket. I don't really see a VP that drew in the entire moderate center of Atlasia to his ticket as a liability. Of course, we can always see how October goes.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fritz on August 24, 2009, 06:52:16 AM
What ticket are you guys running?  Did I miss the announcement?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese on August 24, 2009, 07:01:53 AM
What ticket are you guys running?  Did I miss the announcement?

Only the RPP members know who their candidate is. They're sworn to secrecy, not to reveal who it is until that candidate makes an official statement. So no, you didn't miss the announcment.



Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 24, 2009, 09:21:12 AM
What ticket are you guys running?  Did I miss the announcement?

Only the RPP members know who their candidate is. They're sworn to secrecy, not to reveal who it is until that candidate makes an official statement. So no, you didn't miss the announcment.
I'd honestly be surprised if you didn't know the ticket, to be honest I was under the impression that nearly 70% of Atlasia already knew


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 24, 2009, 09:49:49 AM
What ticket are you guys running?  Did I miss the announcement?

Only the RPP members know who their candidate is. They're sworn to secrecy, not to reveal who it is until that candidate makes an official statement. So no, you didn't miss the announcment.
I'd honestly be surprised if you didn't know the ticket, to be honest I was under the impression that nearly 70% of Atlasia already knew

Which doesn't mean we're telling anyone that doesn't. ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 24, 2009, 10:00:44 AM
Looking ahead, the RPP plans, for the first time in their history, to contest all five senate seats


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 24, 2009, 01:14:27 PM
It's time to rebuild our party!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 24, 2009, 01:28:32 PM
     It's time to become Atlasia's first truly national party in years!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on August 24, 2009, 03:47:46 PM
What ticket are you guys running?  Did I miss the announcement?

Only the RPP members know who their candidate is. They're sworn to secrecy, not to reveal who it is until that candidate makes an official statement. So no, you didn't miss the announcment.



Yeah we're not allowed to tell you we are running the unbeatable ticket of JewishConservative/cindywho.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: California8429 on August 24, 2009, 10:43:33 PM
Oh well, so we probably will (once again) fall just short of getting a second seat.  Either way, great job guys and the focus can now shift to October where, I think, we certainly should be favorites to win the presidential election

oh?
Our party numbers are much larger than last time and I have a strong feeling this ticket is going to attract a lot of support

Which ticket? Leadership already decided who's running?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 25, 2009, 12:21:45 AM
Oh well, so we probably will (once again) fall just short of getting a second seat.  Either way, great job guys and the focus can now shift to October where, I think, we certainly should be favorites to win the presidential election

oh?
Our party numbers are much larger than last time and I have a strong feeling this ticket is going to attract a lot of support

Which ticket? Leadership already decided who's running?

we are running the unbeatable ticket of JewishConservative/cindywho.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 25, 2009, 09:49:55 AM
October Election Status

Northeast: TBD
Mideast: Sen. Tmthforu
Midwest: Sen. MasterJedi
Dirty South: Sen. NCYankee
Pacific: TBD

President: TBD/TBD

candidates are yet to declare


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 27, 2009, 04:46:21 PM
Big news a-comin' :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 27, 2009, 07:50:49 PM

I wonder how the public will react.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Vepres on August 27, 2009, 07:54:12 PM

Well, we do know that they will react publicly (snare, snare, symbol)...


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on August 27, 2009, 08:34:46 PM
I'm fairly sure this 'news' is obvious.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 27, 2009, 08:35:43 PM

Are you stalking me or something?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on August 27, 2009, 08:54:45 PM

Yes, look outside your window.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 27, 2009, 08:56:06 PM
I think he thought I was going to announce your run for Pacific senate :P

But I don't think many people will expect the announcement so here it comes (in a post by itself of course)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 27, 2009, 09:08:25 PM
Statement from the Chair

Well, I know I put out a lot of meaningless statements, but this one is certainly far from meaningless.  I was hoping this could be the 1000th post in this thread, and although its close it just feel short.  First, I want to say the following.  In August 2008, conservatism was dead in Atlasia, a few of dredged along in what was left of the ACA, the Republicans, and a few other fragmented parties that did little to nothing.  The party system was dead, turnout was done, and Atlasia seemed to be on its last legs.  Three braves souls, you know who they are by now, decided to give it one least chance and start a little fringe party known as the Southern Secessionist Party.  From there, you know the story, the party system was revitilized, Atlasia was saved, and once again conservatives felt like they had a voice. 

Now, it seems as if conservatives have forgotten what exactly the RPP is all about and why we were founded.  Complaining has taken over and people are questioning whether or not survival is going to continue.  Tales of demise are greatly exaggerated, as they always have been in the past.  However, I want to do something that maybe will change the perception of our party a bit.  I've never been known as someone to be selfless in Atlasia, mostly selfish, but at this point I need to do something that is good for the party rather than myself.

So without further ado, I would like to make the following annoucement.  The RPP as a party cannot have a chair who commands so much focus at this time.  So I will name a successor.  In my time here, only person that I allied with has ever shared my entire feelings for this game.  He was there from the beginning, encouraging me that what we were doing was worthwhile.  In fact, he coined the term Dirty South.

Ladies and gentleman, well mostly gentleman, I am proud to announce Fmr. Gov. AHDuke as the new chairman of the RPP.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 27, 2009, 09:12:46 PM
Thank you for serving us as chairman and building our party into a strong national presence. We wish you luck in your future endeavors regarding regional rights. Also, I am excited to see the new perspective Duke will bring to the role and the ideas he has to build a better RPP.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 27, 2009, 09:16:17 PM
In my time here, only person that I allied with has ever shared my entire feelings for this game.

Now, if only you can translate this post into english.

;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 27, 2009, 09:18:09 PM
Thank you for serving us as chairman and building our party into a strong national presence. We wish you luck in your future endeavors regarding regional rights. Also, I am excited to see the new perspective Duke will bring to the role and the ideas he has to build a better RPP.

     Agreed. This is a new era for the party, & it will be interesting to see where we go after this.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 27, 2009, 09:18:21 PM
In my time here, only person that I allied with has ever shared my entire feelings for this game.

Now, if only you can translate this post into english.

;)

Hey you quote what I quote! That's stealing!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 27, 2009, 09:21:25 PM
In my time here, only person that I allied with has ever shared my entire feelings for this game.

Now, if only you can translate this post into english.

;)

Hey you quote what I quote! That's stealing!

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on August 27, 2009, 09:23:32 PM
()

I wish the new leader the best.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on August 27, 2009, 09:29:29 PM
First, I want to thank DWTL for his service to this party and to this game. While we may not see eye to eye on every issue, I must admit that without him, Atlasia would not be the same. He brought the dedication and passion that all Atlasians should embrace. It was a passion that led to the creation of the RPP, and a passion that may have led to many, many controversies which sprang forth during his tenure.

But today we stand at a crossroads in the RPP. We have expanded a great deal in the past few months. We have made great strides in national recognition. Yet, we find ourselves dissatisfied. We did not win the two senate seats we expected to win. We have lost several high profile members. Neither of these sit well with me. Also, there are several scandals that are being thrown at the RPP, and as Chairman, I pledge to all Atlasians that if any illegal or otherwise shady activity that is unfair to the game is occurring in recruiting, I will make sure to stop it.

I am also up for working with other Atlasians of other parties for the good of this nation. I'm proud of the connections and friends I have made in other parties, and I hope that we will be able to use those for the good of the game in the future. I cannot say that my style of leadership will be anywhere near the style DWTL used, but I hope all members of the RPP, from the oldest to the newest, feel comfortable coming to me with any problems or concerns they have with the party, as well as ideas that they feel could better the party.

Again, I thank the former Chairman for the appointment, and I look forward to the road ahead. Let's get to work.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 27, 2009, 09:35:10 PM
As a note, I will remain heavily involved in Atlasia and serve in the RPP in pretty much the capacity Duke has for the last year. 


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on August 27, 2009, 09:36:46 PM
As a note, I will remain heavily involved in Atlasia and serve in the RPP in pretty much the capacity Duke has for the last year. 

So basically you're now the power behind the throne.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 27, 2009, 09:37:31 PM
Post #1000!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MasterJedi on August 27, 2009, 09:40:22 PM
As a note, I will remain heavily involved in Atlasia and serve in the RPP in pretty much the capacity Duke has for the last year. 

So basically you're now the power behind the throne.

You mean like your JCP Emperor bgwah? Bow to your master serf! :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on August 27, 2009, 09:42:49 PM
As a note, I will remain heavily involved in Atlasia and serve in the RPP in pretty much the capacity Duke has for the last year. 

So basically you're now the power behind the throne.

You mean like your JCP Emperor bgwah? Bow to your master serf! :P

I do. :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on August 27, 2009, 10:05:33 PM
In order to ease the transition for the new leadership, I am keeping PiT on as Vice-Chair, but I am expanding the position to include another Vice-chair, Senator Tmthforu in order to inject some newer blood into the RPP. He's a promising young fellow.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on August 27, 2009, 10:06:14 PM
In order to ease the transition for the new leadership, I am keeping PiT on as Vice-Chair, but I am expanding the position to include another Vice-chair, Senator Tmthforu in order to inject some newer blood into the RPP. He's a promising young fellow.

Well the excitement over your leadership lasted about half an hour. Well played, sir. :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 27, 2009, 10:27:00 PM
Do you guys, like, just do whatever you want? Or do you follow the bylaws?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 27, 2009, 10:30:39 PM
Do you guys, like, just do whatever you want? Or do you follow the bylaws?

Follow the bylaws.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 27, 2009, 10:38:15 PM
Do you guys, like, just do whatever you want? Or do you follow the bylaws?
We follow the bylaws, technically PiT resigned as vice-chair, I appointed Duke, then resigned, then Duke re-appointed PiT upon assuming the chair.  He then created a new position, which could be contested at the next convention.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on August 28, 2009, 12:00:50 AM
Right. Nothing in the bylaws says I can't half the vice chair office into two positions. If the general RPP opposes it, then can vote against it in the next Convention is October.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 28, 2009, 12:10:47 AM
Do you guys, like, just do whatever you want? Or do you follow the bylaws?
We follow the bylaws, technically PiT resigned as vice-chair, I appointed Duke, then resigned, then Duke re-appointed PiT upon assuming the chair.  He then created a new position, which could be contested at the next convention.

Interesting maneuver there.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on August 28, 2009, 12:12:07 AM
Do you guys, like, just do whatever you want? Or do you follow the bylaws?
We follow the bylaws, technically PiT resigned as vice-chair, I appointed Duke, then resigned, then Duke re-appointed PiT upon assuming the chair.  He then created a new position, which could be contested at the next convention.

Interesting maneuver there.

Long live democracy.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: big bad fab on August 28, 2009, 07:43:04 AM
The life of a political party is always an uneasily-reached balance between direct democracy and efficiency.

Parties which are embedded in institutions for a long time, either because of false democratic system (Paraguayan Colorado party), or because of history (Mexican PRI, South African ANC), or because of structurally strong following (Japanese LDP, Atlasian JCP or its predecessors), can afford open divisions, delays in picking leadership, etc.

But for parties with fading support (French Socialist party) or for young parties (Germany's Die Linke, Atlasian RPP), you also need to have an efficient and coherent leadership and to be able to take quick decisions, which are, a bit later, validated or reversed by a gathering of all the members.
Otherwise, you lose and, what is more, you've got parochial trends that are, eventually, contrary to democracy (see the French Socialist party, see the UK's Labour nowadays).

Hadn't the RPP taken a quick decision, some people outside the party would have criticized him for not being able to draw conclusions from its disappointing result and not being so alive.

This party is alive, shows that it's not one man's thing like Bayrou's French Democrat Movement, has gained one seat and is ready to keep on !


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on August 28, 2009, 09:14:08 AM
This little show reminds me of Eastern Bloc Communist Parties. Or any party run on a democratic centralist ideas... Ironic, quite.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Devilman88 on August 28, 2009, 10:40:13 AM
I just want to say Thank you to DWTL, him and I aren't the best of friends as many may know, but he did change the face of Atlasia and for that I thank him. I would also like to welcome our new chairman Duke. Duke you are a good friend of mine here in Atlasia and I do hope to work with you and everyone in the RPP. I hope you guys let me help.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 28, 2009, 04:53:44 PM
Actually I read the bylaws, and it says nothing about a new chair just that we can have elections for them at the convention


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on August 28, 2009, 04:56:28 PM
This little show reminds me of Eastern Bloc Communist Parties. Or any party run on a democratic centralist ideas... Ironic, quite.

Yeah, I noticed that a while back. Hilarious, really.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 29, 2009, 08:23:19 AM
Well, the reason these two left is fairly simple:

They wanted a vote on chairman right now.  I stated that it would happen at the convention, but it was an unnecessary distraction that we did not need now.  I also stated that I didn't want to be part of a party that didn't espoused the beliefs I founded this party upon.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on August 29, 2009, 08:31:48 AM
Well, the reason these two left is fairly simple:

They wanted a vote on chairman right now.  I stated that it would happen at the convention, but it was an unnecessary distraction that we did not need now.  I also stated that I didn't want to be part of a party that didn't espoused the beliefs I founded this party upon.

No, you want a confirmation vote of Duke. We want a free and open election.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 29, 2009, 08:47:52 AM
Well, the reason these two left is fairly simple:

They wanted a vote on chairman right now.  I stated that it would happen at the convention, but it was an unnecessary distraction that we did not need now.  I also stated that I didn't want to be part of a party that didn't espoused the beliefs I founded this party upon.

No, you want a confirmation vote of Duke. We want a free and open election.
The bylaws never ever called for such thing, this isn't an exact quote but the gist is that the chairman can be put up to a vote at the convention.  If he fails to gain 50% of the vote at the convention, then an open vote is held in which the current chair can run.  If you object to the bylaws, that could also be done at the convention.  Leaving the party was an incredibly irrational response especially after we threw our support at you instead making sure a loyal member like SPC got in first


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on August 30, 2009, 01:06:35 PM
A New Direction for the RPP

I am sure that most of you all have been following the drama surrounding the RPP over the course of the past few days. DWTL has resigned. We lost a few very influential members, regained them, and then lost some other members. We've heard the death of the RPP being proclaimed from a top the hills of Atlasia, and we've had the Grim Reaper on our front door step. In a fleeting moment the other night, it appeared as if the party was spiraling out of control.

During these tough times, we learn who our friends really are. We learn who we can trust and who we cannot. We learn who really cares about the principles they espouse, and we learn who do not. I am happy that some members have returned to the party, and to those who have not and do not intend to, I wish you nothing but the best. If you wish to work with the party in the future, I can assure you that we will gladly open our doors to you.

I want to move on to the more pressing issues facing the party. I and the whole community of RPP members acknowledge that we are at a crossroads in our party. I'm not going to take the time to satisfy the dissenters by trashing DWTL, but I will move on and address what is to come for the RPP in the coming month prior to our Convention in October, mainly highlighting two major reforms.

First, I would like to announce that the era of vengeful attacks, hit lists, and secretive operations is over as far as I am concerned. All matters pertaining to the RPP will be discussed in public in order for all Atlasian to read and, more importantly, for all members of the RPP to vote. The private forum will remain open, but only to be used for sensitive material like possible tickets and the like. The party desperately needs transparency and accountability, and one of my main goals during my interim chairmanship is to make sure we move toward that direction. We cannot allow ourselves to engage in petty fights and deceitful activity that is counterproductive to the game that we all hold so dear to our hearts.

Second, the RPP will begin to move toward deregulating leadership positions in order to give all members the opportunity to run for and win the chairmanship. I have always believed in fresh blood because a marketplace of ideas is essential to keeping a party up-to-date and adherent to member's wishes. Legislation is currently being drafted for a procedure, to be introduced at the convention, that will lead the way to electing a chairman by the people and for the people of the RPP. Additional legislation will be drafted to allow members to petition the chairman for votes on initiatives and to overturn current bylaws that a certain group disagrees, provided they have enough support.

While these two reforms may not be headline worthy, I feel it is a huge step for the RPP moving forward. The RPP must understands the importance of compromise. I hope to use my friendships and partnerships with other party members to help repair the heavily damaged image the party has been labeled with recently. We want to work with all parties in Atlasia to better our nation. I look forward to the months ahead, and I feel like the RPP has a strong future.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on August 30, 2009, 02:27:58 PM
First, I would like to announce that the era of hit lists is over


...


...


...

wut


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on August 30, 2009, 04:08:25 PM
First, I would like to announce that the era of hit lists is over


...


...


...

wut

Charming.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 30, 2009, 06:03:17 PM
I may say I am very depressed the hit list is gone, the last one was great even though it some thought it should have included Marokai to which I completely disagreed


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Countess Anya of the North Parish on August 30, 2009, 06:05:37 PM
I may say I am very depressed the hit list is gone, the last one was great even though it some thought it should have included Marokai to which I completely disagreed
WTF? god you party was really screwed up. may still be, who knows.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on August 30, 2009, 06:08:59 PM
Little old me on a hit list? :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on August 30, 2009, 06:11:17 PM
I may say I am very depressed the hit list is gone, the last one was great even though it some thought it should have included Marokai to which I completely disagreed
WTF? god you party was really screwed up. may still be, who knows.
It wasn't an actual kill people list, it was get these people as far away from power list.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on August 30, 2009, 06:44:43 PM
Oh noes, I'm off the hit list.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 30, 2009, 10:47:18 PM
There's only one hit list: Lewis/Hashemite/me.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Vepres on August 30, 2009, 10:49:59 PM
There's only one hit list: Lewis/Hashemite/me.

No, if that was a real hit list, you would have to have at least one Michael Jackson song on it :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on August 30, 2009, 10:50:51 PM
There's only one hit list: Lewis/Hashemite/me.

No, if that was a real hit list, you would have to have at least one Michael Jackson song on it :P

;D

But that was the original RPP hit list, of course.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Mechaman on August 30, 2009, 11:44:02 PM
I made this in honor of the RPP:

()


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Countess Anya of the North Parish on August 30, 2009, 11:51:03 PM
I made this in honor of the RPP:

()
hahahaha that is great! :D


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on August 30, 2009, 11:51:50 PM
I will make banners that are better than sewage socialists, for free.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on August 31, 2009, 12:05:55 AM

Apparently the RPP expires in November 2009.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 03, 2009, 07:32:01 AM
I am eagerly awaiting our November 2009 collapse


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: big bad fab on September 03, 2009, 10:28:29 AM
The RPP is the Really Perpetual Party: it will never collapse !


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on September 03, 2009, 02:57:13 PM
The RPP is the Really Perpetual Party: it will never collapse !

God help us.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Barnes on September 03, 2009, 08:26:23 PM
The RPP is the Really Perpetual Party: it will never collapse !

It will become "The Party" like in 1984! ;D


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: big bad fab on September 04, 2009, 02:30:47 AM
The RPP is the Really Perpetual Party: it will never collapse !

It will become "The Party" like in 1984! ;D
If it's not like in "The Party" with Peter Sellers...

More seriously, guys, don't you think that this party doesn't fit the image you (try to) stick to it ?

Duke, Tmthforu, PiT, NiK, NCYankee, Smid, Hamilton, etc, are all moderates in ideas, even if not always in formal aspects, but it's perfectly legitimate as the debate should be full of life.
And when you've got a situation structurally difficult, you have to fight.

So, please use less dumb recipes than quoting DWTL ever and ever and ever ;)
That's becoming a bit... boring.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 12, 2009, 09:42:52 AM
When are we going to decide on a final strategy for October?

December seems to be a go with myself and Hamilton running as at-large with the focus again being to take down Afleitch


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on September 12, 2009, 09:45:59 AM
When are we going to decide on a final strategy for October?

December seems to be a go with myself and Hamilton running as at-large with the focus again being to take down Afleitch
I strongly oppose the strategy of focusing on eliminating Afleitch. I think our goal should simply be to get 2 Senators in, no matter who they replace.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Franzl on September 12, 2009, 09:46:48 AM
When are we going to decide on a final strategy for October?

December seems to be a go with myself and Hamilton running as at-large with the focus again being to take down Afleitch
I strongly oppose the strategy of focusing on eliminating Afleitch. I think our goal should simply be to get 2 Senators in, no matter who they replace.

That would seem like a more mature, professional way to do things.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Ebowed on September 12, 2009, 09:47:46 AM
When are we going to decide on a final strategy for October?

December seems to be a go with myself and Hamilton running as at-large with the focus again being to take down Afleitch
I strongly oppose the strategy of focusing on eliminating Afleitch. I think our goal should simply be to get 2 Senators in, no matter who they replace.

That would seem like a more mature, professional way to do things.

Which is why that is not the strategy of this party. :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on September 12, 2009, 09:48:13 AM
So the RPP is going to run a candidate to the left of some candidates already in there. Brilliant I tell ya, brilliant!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 12, 2009, 10:07:44 AM
When are we going to decide on a final strategy for October?

December seems to be a go with myself and Hamilton running as at-large with the focus again being to take down Afleitch
I strongly oppose the strategy of focusing on eliminating Afleitch. I think our goal should simply be to get 2 Senators in, no matter who they replace.

That would seem like a more mature, professional way to do things.
Yea but as you would say, some things are more important :)

Tmth, cool it man we've already proved to you that Afletich hates our party stop being stupid


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on September 12, 2009, 11:00:08 AM
When are we going to decide on a final strategy for October?

December seems to be a go with myself and Hamilton running as at-large with the focus again being to take down Afleitch
I strongly oppose the strategy of focusing on eliminating Afleitch. I think our goal should simply be to get 2 Senators in, no matter who they replace.

That would seem like a more mature, professional way to do things.
Yea but as you would say, some things are more important :)

Tmth, cool it man we've already proved to you that Afletich hates our party stop being stupid
Cool it? I'm not the person in our party with the short fuse....


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on September 12, 2009, 11:01:18 AM
Someone remind me who leads this party again.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 12, 2009, 02:06:24 PM
When are we going to decide on a final strategy for October?

December seems to be a go with myself and Hamilton running as at-large with the focus again on getting two seats for our party

Sounds perfect


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on September 12, 2009, 02:34:27 PM
When are we going to decide on a final strategy for October?

December seems to be a go with myself and Hamilton running as at-large with the focus again being to take down Afleitch
I strongly oppose the strategy of focusing on eliminating Afleitch. I think our goal should simply be to get 2 Senators in, no matter who they replace.

That would seem like a more mature, professional way to do things.
Yea but as you would say, some things are more important :)

Tmth, cool it man we've already proved to you that Afletich hates our party stop being stupid
Cool it? I'm not the person in our party with the short fuse....

DWTL is pure Nuclear Fusion man, that is constantly exploding producing more energy for yet more destruction, no fuse is necessary its self-proppelled, perpetual and available at Wal-Mart, some assembly required, batteries not included. :D Warning: If improperly handle it could explode, some side effects include but are not limited to Nausea, Headache, Upset stomach, Chest Pain, severe depression. It has also been linked to a high risk of "suicidal tendecies" in some people. Consult a doctor immediately if any of these symptoms occur.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 12, 2009, 03:46:14 PM
So the RPP is going to run a candidate to the left of some candidates already in there. Brilliant I tell ya, brilliant!

We are non-ideological.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on September 12, 2009, 03:54:17 PM
So the RPP is going to run a candidate to the left of some candidates already in there. Brilliant I tell ya, brilliant!

We are non-ideological.


lol


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 12, 2009, 04:55:34 PM
Can the RPP give an official endorsement to the Jedi lead ticket?  Do we have to wait til the convention?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 12, 2009, 04:56:46 PM
According to the bylaws don't we automatically endorse MasterJedi unless another RPPer joins the race?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on September 12, 2009, 05:02:48 PM
Would you rather support someone from your party with no experience, or someone from another party with loads of expeience?

(Hypothetical, it doesn't apply in this situation)

Our A.S.S. Security guards must be asleep on the job. SPC get you people on the job or there fired. ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 12, 2009, 05:07:23 PM
Would you rather support someone from your party with no experience, or someone from another party with loads of expeience?

(Hypothetical, it doesn't apply in this situation)

Our A.S.S. Security guards must be asleep on the job. SPC get you people on the job or there fired. ;)


Can you answer my question?

Can you GTFO our thread?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on September 12, 2009, 05:23:30 PM
Would you rather support someone from your party with no experience, or someone from another party with loads of expeience?

(Hypothetical, it doesn't apply in this situation)

Our A.S.S. Security guards must be asleep on the job. SPC get you people on the job or there fired. ;)


Can you answer my question?

Can you GTFO our thread?

Once you answer my question.

Jedi/Gustaf, can we get an IP check on this a**hole?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on September 12, 2009, 05:55:46 PM
Jedi/Gustaf, can we get an IP check on this a**hole?

Mod hat on: a thread on him as been posted on the Mods board.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on September 12, 2009, 06:43:00 PM
So the RPP is going to run a candidate to the left of some candidates already in there. Brilliant I tell ya, brilliant!

We are non-ideological.


lol


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 12, 2009, 06:49:31 PM

Thought provoking.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on September 12, 2009, 06:53:15 PM

The idea that you aren't a conservative (or simply just a power hungry) party is ludicrous. Name one RPP office-holder that isn't a conservative economically and socially.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 12, 2009, 06:54:04 PM

The idea that you aren't a conservative (or simply just a power hungry) party is ludicrous. Name one RPP office-holder that isn't a conservative economically and socially.

PiT


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on September 12, 2009, 07:04:02 PM
Do you know what "and" means?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 12, 2009, 07:04:49 PM

Yes. PiT is not conservative economically AND socially, only economically. Our chairman is much more liberal than conservative. We have a moderate/progressive and a drug leagalizer running in December.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on September 12, 2009, 07:20:32 PM

You should have said "or". By saying "and" you are basically saying all RPPer's are conservative both Socially and Fiscally.

As to the question, some are beginning to think I am socialist on economics and PiT has been to thrilled with my social positions lately either. So to say we are all the same is not accurate. As whole though we are a conservative party compared to everyone else. 


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on September 12, 2009, 08:28:32 PM
Our chairman is much more liberal than conservative.

lol


We have a moderate/progressive running in December.

who?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 17, 2009, 04:56:32 PM
I was just reading our platform and it turns out that NCYank ascribes to none of it :)

The only interesting thing I did not know is that we support allowing SC justices to be recalled if 3 regions request it.  Did we ever even try to do this?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 17, 2009, 04:59:12 PM
I was just reading our platform and it turns out that NCYank ascribes to none of it :)

The only interesting thing I did not know is that we support allowing SC justices to be recalled if 3 regions request it.  Did we ever even try to do this?

No. Is opebo still on the court? :P

Anyways, I don't think we should still be using the same platform as October 2008.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 17, 2009, 05:09:23 PM
I was just reading our platform and it turns out that NCYank ascribes to none of it :)

The only interesting thing I did not know is that we support allowing SC justices to be recalled if 3 regions request it.  Did we ever even try to do this?

No. Is opebo still on the court? :P

Anyways, I don't think we should still be using the same platform as October 2008.
Why?  If anything this party needs to return to heydey of October-December 2008


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 17, 2009, 05:16:37 PM
I was just reading our platform and it turns out that NCYank ascribes to none of it :)

The only interesting thing I did not know is that we support allowing SC justices to be recalled if 3 regions request it.  Did we ever even try to do this?

No. Is opebo still on the court? :P

Anyways, I don't think we should still be using the same platform as October 2008.
Why?  If anything this party needs to return to heydey of October-December 2008

Those issues aren't as relevant now to Atlasia and our party and our future success.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on September 17, 2009, 05:36:24 PM
The long awaited platform has arrived...

Mission Statement

The Regional Protection Party stands for the rights of regions, in the grand tradition of men like Jefferson, Madison, and Jackson.  We oppose attempts by the federal government to infringe on the rights of regions, and we will continue to oppose any such attempts in the future.

Foreign Policy Issues

Atlasia is and must remain an integral nation on the world stage.  We fully support all other liberal democracies.  During times of global crises Atlasia should lead the good nations of the world in the fight, but we should not bring that fight alone.  As we are one of the many leaders of the spread of democracy, we must also be the vanguard when it comes to military technology.  We cannot rely on the kindness of others when our nation’s future is at stake.  The military should remain robust as long as there are threats to democracy out there.

Our main Foreign Policy goal should be the spread and protection of our fellow democratic states.  We should work with our allies in making life very uncomfortable for the dictatorships and oligarchies of the world.

Economic Issues

"We believe that burdensome taxes stifle opportunity and should be minimised."

"We believe that a budget deficit is a deferred tax that will need to be paid in future budgets, and as such we believe that the government's priority should be balancing the budget."
"We believe that our tax system exists to fund the decent services in health, education, aged care, and other services that Atlasians legitimately expect and are entitled to receive. If after we provide for those services, invest for the future, and balance our budget, we can reduce the tax burden, we should do so."

Education

"The Regional Protection Party believes that every child has a right to access educational services until the age of 18."

"We believe that it is the responsibility of regions to provide a suitable level of education to all children within the region."

Forum Affairs

We believe that to secure the rights of the regions, the Senate must need be deprived of certain law-making powers, namely to prevent it from regulating the affairs of the regions. As such, the president and vice-president's powers would necessarily be reduced as well.

We wish to retain the Class A seats as regional in order to retain the advantages of the regional Senate seat; those being guaranteed representation of all Atlasians, as well as a distinct constituency to which a Senator can be held accountable.

While we support the increased power of the regions, we do recognize that at-large Senate seats do have definite benefits; those benefits including more competitive elections with Senators who are accountable to all the citizens of Atlasia. As such, we wish to retain the Class B seats as at-large.

It is our opinion that a Supreme Court Justice ought must stand for re-confirmation if called for by Senators representing at least three regions.
Social Issues

-Freedom of speech, assembly, religion, the press and respect for the due process of law are essential components to a free society.
-We hold that the right to bear arms is a fundamental freedom. Notwithstanding, the regions shall exercise individual discretion on registration requirements for firearms and other weapons.

-Drug control policy is best decided individually by the regional governments.

-The legality of abortion for any non-medical reason should ultimately be legislated upon by the regional governments.

-We hold that illegal immigration is an issue on which the regions must have greater input. The public infrastructure of each region is utilized by all residents, regardless of legal status. Therefore, it is necessary that all those who reside in Atlasia pay their proper share of taxes.

-Regulation and criminalization of prostitution is an issue which the regional governments must determine individually.

-Environmental protection legislation should be decided upon by the regional governments.

-Educational policy and curricular content must be determined by the regions. In this way, Atlasian students will receive the most relevant instruction and attention to individual needs. The national government cannot provide this with a one size fits all educational plan.

-We believe in strong penalties for violent crime. The final decision on punishment of violent criminals must rest with the regions. The death penalty should be an option if a regional government determines such a measure is appropriate

As a response to DWTL, I agree with everything that is bolded and for some of the stuff that isn't, I partially agree. I beleive thats about 85% of the platform.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 17, 2009, 06:48:01 PM
Yeah but your recent nanny stating federal laws have irked me :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on September 17, 2009, 07:20:03 PM
Yeah but your recent nanny stating federal laws have irked me :P

I am the only Senator to vote againts both the Health Care Bill and the Merton Rule Bill. I voted for the Stimulus and introduced the Credit Bill, beyond that what have I done to irk you. I told PiT that I would much more Socially Conservative back in May, he said it wouldn't be a problem. I assumed he spoke for you as well. Now the both of you are giving me hell.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MasterJedi on September 17, 2009, 07:38:45 PM
Yeah but your recent nanny stating federal laws have irked me :P

I am the only Senator to vote againts both the Health Care Bill and the Merton Rule Bill. I voted for the Stimulus and introduced the Credit Bill, beyond that what have I done to irk you. I told PiT that I would much more Socially Conservative back in May, he said it wouldn't be a problem. I assumed he spoke for you as well. Now the both of you are giving me hell.

Well I don't know why they're not hitting me too to be honest. :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on September 17, 2009, 07:39:21 PM
Yeah but your recent nanny stating federal laws have irked me :P


lol


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on September 17, 2009, 08:17:43 PM
Yeah but your recent nanny stating federal laws have irked me :P

I am the only Senator to vote againts both the Health Care Bill and the Merton Rule Bill. I voted for the Stimulus and introduced the Credit Bill, beyond that what have I done to irk you. I told PiT that I would much more Socially Conservative back in May, he said it wouldn't be a problem. I assumed he spoke for you as well. Now the both of you are giving me hell.

     Well, we are mainly giving you grief in jest (at least I am). However, I will admit that I did not expect you to crusade against legalized pornography. :P But I am not really in a position where I have an excuse to complain, anyway.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 17, 2009, 09:05:31 PM
Just trying to keep in check man ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: cinyc on September 18, 2009, 12:30:02 AM
Yeah but your recent nanny stating federal laws have irked me :P

I am the only Senator to vote againts both the Health Care Bill and the Merton Rule Bill. I voted for the Stimulus and introduced the Credit Bill, beyond that what have I done to irk you. I told PiT that I would much more Socially Conservative back in May, he said it wouldn't be a problem. I assumed he spoke for you as well. Now the both of you are giving me hell.

     Well, we are mainly giving you grief in jest (at least I am). However, I will admit that I did not expect you to crusade against legalized pornography. :P But I am not really in a position where I have an excuse to complain, anyway.

Don't you mean the sale of pornography to children?  That's what the BCBW bill does - lets 14-year-olds buy porn without parental consent.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 18, 2009, 12:31:04 AM
Yeah but your recent nanny stating federal laws have irked me :P

I am the only Senator to vote againts both the Health Care Bill and the Merton Rule Bill. I voted for the Stimulus and introduced the Credit Bill, beyond that what have I done to irk you. I told PiT that I would much more Socially Conservative back in May, he said it wouldn't be a problem. I assumed he spoke for you as well. Now the both of you are giving me hell.

     Well, we are mainly giving you grief in jest (at least I am). However, I will admit that I did not expect you to crusade against legalized pornography. :P But I am not really in a position where I have an excuse to complain, anyway.

Don't you mean the sale of pornography to children?  That's what the BCBW bill does - lets 14-year-olds buy porn without parental consent.

Yeah but Yankee also said that he'd prefer to outlaw pornography outright, it's just an impossible task due to the make up of the Senate. I doubt he could find ten Atlasians to agree that extreme of a position.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on September 18, 2009, 07:44:03 AM
Yeah but your recent nanny stating federal laws have irked me :P

I am the only Senator to vote againts both the Health Care Bill and the Merton Rule Bill. I voted for the Stimulus and introduced the Credit Bill, beyond that what have I done to irk you. I told PiT that I would much more Socially Conservative back in May, he said it wouldn't be a problem. I assumed he spoke for you as well. Now the both of you are giving me hell.

     Well, we are mainly giving you grief in jest (at least I am). However, I will admit that I did not expect you to crusade against legalized pornography. :P But I am not really in a position where I have an excuse to complain, anyway.

Don't you mean the sale of pornography to children?  That's what the BCBW bill does - lets 14-year-olds buy porn without parental consent.

Yeah but Yankee also said that he'd prefer to outlaw pornography outright, it's just an impossible task due to the make up of the Senate. I doubt he could find ten Atlasians to agree that extreme of a position.

Yes but for right now all I care about is the defeating the BCBW bill.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 21, 2009, 09:00:52 PM
Motion to use the powers provided by the "Party Empowerment Act" to expel Tmthforu94


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on September 21, 2009, 09:03:34 PM
Motion to use the powers provided by the "Party Empowerment Act" to expel Tmthforu94

LOL


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on September 21, 2009, 09:06:14 PM
Motion to use the powers provided by the "Party Empowerment Act" to expel Tmthforu94

LOL


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 21, 2009, 09:28:43 PM
No. We're not expelling anyone, especially over a silly he said, she said fight.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on September 21, 2009, 09:31:34 PM
No. We're not expelling anyone, especially over a silly he said, she said fight.

Which one was the "she"?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 21, 2009, 10:10:45 PM
No. We're not expelling anyone, especially over a silly he said, she said fight.

Which one was the "she"?

Let your imagination run wild ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 22, 2009, 02:44:09 PM
Yeah, I have to agree with Duke, expelling anyone from the party who hasn't joined the party as a joke or done something extremely detrimental to the party is ridiculous.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on September 22, 2009, 04:15:41 PM
Yeah, I have to agree with Duke, expelling anyone from the party who hasn't joined the party as a joke or done something extremely detrimental to the party is ridiculous.

I concur with DWTL.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 22, 2009, 04:20:05 PM
So Hamilton really left over this? Really?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on September 22, 2009, 04:21:55 PM
So Hamilton really left over this? Really?

Hamilton left?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on September 22, 2009, 04:24:30 PM

wtf?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 22, 2009, 04:25:05 PM

That's what I was told. He said he'd be back to stir things up.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on September 22, 2009, 04:40:08 PM

That's what I was told. He said he'd be back to stir things up.

Why does everyone I recruit turn out to be a joke or innactive? I guess I don't have the touch.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on September 22, 2009, 04:43:17 PM

That's what I was told. He said he'd be back to stir things up.

Why does everyone I recruit turn out to be a joke or innactive? I guess I don't have the touch.

There's no way you would know that he would turn out to be a raving maniac.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on September 22, 2009, 04:44:40 PM

"Rejoice, rejoice, rejoice!"


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on September 22, 2009, 05:43:23 PM
()


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 22, 2009, 06:23:33 PM
Don't worry, I didn't leave, I was just spending the day in the emergency room. In case you all haven't noticed I have not been myself lately, I have actually been very stressed and got sick, I have too much going on at once. I will probably be back to my regular self in 4 or 5 days.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Badger on September 22, 2009, 07:54:17 PM
Jeez, dude!  Hope everything's OK. Take care, put down the computer (or scream at people on line if it reduces stress) :-) Either way, get well soon. K?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 22, 2009, 07:56:11 PM
Jeez, dude!  Hope everything's OK. Take care, put down the computer (or scream at people on line if it reduces stress) :-) Either way, get well soon. K?

Thanks for the support. I had a build up of acid in my sotmach and esophagus so I had very intense pains. But the stomach pain is probably preferable to what I am going through now, tbh.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Badger on September 22, 2009, 07:59:58 PM
Jeez, dude!  Hope everything's OK. Take care, put down the computer (or scream at people on line if it reduces stress) :-) Either way, get well soon. K?

Thanks for the support. I had a build up of acid in my sotmach and esophagus so I had very intense pains. But the stomach pain is probably preferable to what I am going through now, tbh.
So, gotta ask:

Has this situation caused temporary insanity explaining the "Whaaa???" new avatar and Index scores? :-D


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 22, 2009, 08:01:15 PM
Jeez, dude!  Hope everything's OK. Take care, put down the computer (or scream at people on line if it reduces stress) :-) Either way, get well soon. K?

Thanks for the support. I had a build up of acid in my sotmach and esophagus so I had very intense pains. But the stomach pain is probably preferable to what I am going through now, tbh.
So, gotta ask:

Has this situation caused temporary insanity explaining the "Whaaa???" new avatar and Index scores? :-D

Like I said, I am not myself lately and honestly I am quite confused about what is going on now. So I'm not really a green party member I'm jsut fukking around but if no one wants to take me seriously, why should I be serious abut myself?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Badger on September 22, 2009, 08:03:40 PM
Jeez, dude!  Hope everything's OK. Take care, put down the computer (or scream at people on line if it reduces stress) :-) Either way, get well soon. K?

Thanks for the support. I had a build up of acid in my sotmach and esophagus so I had very intense pains. But the stomach pain is probably preferable to what I am going through now, tbh.
So, gotta ask:

Has this situation caused temporary insanity explaining the "Whaaa???" new avatar and Index scores? :-D

Like I said, I am not myself lately and honestly I am quite confused about what is going on now. So I'm not really a green party member I'm jsut fukking around but if no one wants to take me seriously, why should I be serious abut myself?
Chilax, friend.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 22, 2009, 08:06:26 PM
Jeez, dude!  Hope everything's OK. Take care, put down the computer (or scream at people on line if it reduces stress) :-) Either way, get well soon. K?

Thanks for the support. I had a build up of acid in my sotmach and esophagus so I had very intense pains. But the stomach pain is probably preferable to what I am going through now, tbh.
So, gotta ask:

Has this situation caused temporary insanity explaining the "Whaaa???" new avatar and Index scores? :-D

Like I said, I am not myself lately and honestly I am quite confused about what is going on now. So I'm not really a green party member I'm jsut fukking around but if no one wants to take me seriously, why should I be serious abut myself?
Chilax, friend.

Some people just take the fun out of the game.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on September 22, 2009, 08:07:31 PM
Jeez, dude!  Hope everything's OK. Take care, put down the computer (or scream at people on line if it reduces stress) :-) Either way, get well soon. K?

Thanks for the support. I had a build up of acid in my sotmach and esophagus so I had very intense pains. But the stomach pain is probably preferable to what I am going through now, tbh.
So, gotta ask:

Has this situation caused temporary insanity explaining the "Whaaa???" new avatar and Index scores? :-D

Like I said, I am not myself lately and honestly I am quite confused about what is going on now. So I'm not really a green party member I'm jsut fukking around but if no one wants to take me seriously, why should I be serious abut myself?
Chilax, friend.

Some people just take the fun out of the game.

Yes you do.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on September 22, 2009, 08:07:52 PM
Jeez, dude!  Hope everything's OK. Take care, put down the computer (or scream at people on line if it reduces stress) :-) Either way, get well soon. K?

Thanks for the support. I had a build up of acid in my sotmach and esophagus so I had very intense pains. But the stomach pain is probably preferable to what I am going through now, tbh.
So, gotta ask:

Has this situation caused temporary insanity explaining the "Whaaa???" new avatar and Index scores? :-D

Like I said, I am not myself lately and honestly I am quite confused about what is going on now. So I'm not really a green party member I'm jsut fukking around but if no one wants to take me seriously, why should I be serious abut myself?
Chilax, friend.

Some people just take the fun out of the game.

Yes you do.

Precisely.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Psychic Octopus on September 22, 2009, 08:09:37 PM
"What happens in Vegas RPP Headquarters, stays in Vegas RPP Headquarters.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on September 22, 2009, 08:09:52 PM
Jeez, dude!  Hope everything's OK. Take care, put down the computer (or scream at people on line if it reduces stress) :-) Either way, get well soon. K?

Thanks for the support. I had a build up of acid in my sotmach and esophagus so I had very intense pains. But the stomach pain is probably preferable to what I am going through now, tbh.
So, gotta ask:

Has this situation caused temporary insanity explaining the "Whaaa???" new avatar and Index scores? :-D

Like I said, I am not myself lately and honestly I am quite confused about what is going on now. So I'm not really a green party member I'm jsut fukking around but if no one wants to take me seriously, why should I be serious abut myself?
Chilax, friend.

Some people just take the fun out of the game.

Yes you do.

Precisely.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 22, 2009, 08:15:29 PM
Jeez, dude!  Hope everything's OK. Take care, put down the computer (or scream at people on line if it reduces stress) :-) Either way, get well soon. K?

Thanks for the support. I had a build up of acid in my sotmach and esophagus so I had very intense pains. But the stomach pain is probably preferable to what I am going through now, tbh.
So, gotta ask:

Has this situation caused temporary insanity explaining the "Whaaa???" new avatar and Index scores? :-D

Like I said, I am not myself lately and honestly I am quite confused about what is going on now. So I'm not really a green party member I'm jsut fukking around but if no one wants to take me seriously, why should I be serious abut myself?
Chilax, friend.

Some people just take the fun out of the game.

Yes you do.

Precisely.

It's fine that you think that, at this rate, you won't be dealing with me much longer. I must say I find your style very distasteful however.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on September 22, 2009, 08:19:07 PM
Look, you're not all bad. You just need to be more honest with people, and stop feuding with good people for no reason. Take a break and deal with whatever issues you're having right now, I've been there.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 22, 2009, 08:25:15 PM
Look, you're not all bad. You just need to be more honest with people, and stop feuding with good people for no reason. Take a break and deal with whatever issues you're having right now, I've been there.

Is it a problem that I honestly believe I've been honest?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Bacon King on September 22, 2009, 08:26:33 PM
stop being such a troll bro


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on September 22, 2009, 08:36:10 PM
     You took a private beef & made it public, Hamilton. That wasn't cool. I suggest you apologize to Duke, HappyWarrior, & anyone else who you involved in your problems with tmth.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on September 22, 2009, 08:36:41 PM
()


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 22, 2009, 08:37:53 PM
     You took a private beef & made it public, Hamilton. That wasn't cool. I suggest you apologize to Duke, HappyWarrior, & anyone else who you involved in your problems with tmth.

I didn't post anything here besides a motion to remove him from the party I was in. So no apology.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on September 22, 2009, 08:48:43 PM
     You took a private beef & made it public, Hamilton. That wasn't cool. I suggest you apologize to Duke, HappyWarrior, & anyone else who you involved in your problems with tmth.

I didn't post anything here besides a motion to remove him from the party I was in. So no apology.

     On the secret forum, I mean. Being part of a secret forum isn't an unlimited right to drag someone else's name through the mud because you have a beef with them.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 22, 2009, 08:52:22 PM
     You took a private beef & made it public, Hamilton. That wasn't cool. I suggest you apologize to Duke, HappyWarrior, & anyone else who you involved in your problems with tmth.

I didn't post anything here besides a motion to remove him from the party I was in. So no apology.

     On the secret forum, I mean. Being part of a secret forum isn't an unlimited right to drag someone else's name through the mud because you have a beef with them.

It's not a secret forum, and like you guys always said, it's no different then PM. Well, you have no problem with him PMing my good friends complete lies about me.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: HappyWarrior on September 22, 2009, 09:18:48 PM
     You took a private beef & made it public, Hamilton. That wasn't cool. I suggest you apologize to Duke, HappyWarrior, & anyone else who you involved in your problems with tmth.

I have no idea how I became involved in this.......


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 22, 2009, 09:19:32 PM
     You took a private beef & made it public, Hamilton. That wasn't cool. I suggest you apologize to Duke, HappyWarrior, & anyone else who you involved in your problems with tmth.

I have no idea how I became involved in this.......

I compared DWTL's smearing you constantly to what tmth has been doing. tahts it, promise. youre a great guy HW


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Badger on September 23, 2009, 07:19:35 AM
Boo to your returned avatar and updated Index scores! >:-l Return to the dark bright side young jedi.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 25, 2009, 09:38:38 AM
Alright since enemies of freedom like BaconKing have once again done everything in their power to make cheap political ploys to deprive the Dirty South of the immensely popular assembly, I say we set up an unofficial assembly.

We'll teach this rebels that the Dirty South will not tolerate the will of the people being neglected.  Here's the plan:

1.) We set up an unofficial assembly
2.) That unoffiical assembly works on bills and agrees upon them
3.) As soon as a few laws are drawn up, we have the governor bring them up for an emergency vote
4.) We pass them by simple majorities

Anyone who actually cares about the Dirty South and our activity and not the political goals of the JCP to disrupt the RPP conducting business, I urge you to join me.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Lief 🗽 on September 25, 2009, 10:06:24 AM
Cheap political ploys = allowing everyone who wants to vote to actually vote?

wow.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 25, 2009, 10:21:37 AM
Cheap political ploys = allowing everyone who wants to vote to actually vote?

wow.
No, defeating the assembly is a cheap political ploy


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Lief 🗽 on September 25, 2009, 10:26:04 AM
Yes, but the assembly was defeated because not enough residents of the Southeast wanted it. That's how the government and the laws work. There were no "cheap political ploys"; this was a result of a free and fair election that your side lost.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 25, 2009, 10:33:38 AM
Yes, but the assembly was defeated because not enough residents of the Southeast wanted it. That's how the government and the laws work. There were no "cheap political ploys"; this was a result of a free and fair election that your side lost.
There was no legitimate reason to oppose this legislature (something popular in every region proposed) except for cheap political purposes.  If that was worth a boatload of 2nd preferences so be it, but the RPP is probably willing to give all its second preferences to Franzl that would have gone to you because you played this dirty little trick and deprived the majority will of the Dirty South.  If Jedi is eliminated, Franzl will become president now simple as that because you went against your game reform ideals into cheap tricks


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Franzl on September 25, 2009, 10:41:15 AM
I would really prefer to get 2nd preferences because people think I'm the next best candidate to their primary choice....not just to take revenge on another candidate :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 25, 2009, 10:43:28 AM
I would really prefer to get 2nd preferences because people think I'm the next best candidate to their primary choice....not just to take revenge on another candidate :)
Well as I said, I was undecided.  This decision just made it all the easier


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on September 25, 2009, 10:53:59 AM
You are quite such a Leninist and don't seem to realise it. Very strange.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Lief 🗽 on September 25, 2009, 11:02:14 AM
Yes, but the assembly was defeated because not enough residents of the Southeast wanted it. That's how the government and the laws work. There were no "cheap political ploys"; this was a result of a free and fair election that your side lost.
There was no legitimate reason to oppose this legislature (something popular in every region proposed) except for cheap political purposes.  If that was worth a boatload of 2nd preferences so be it, but the RPP is probably willing to give all its second preferences to Franzl that would have gone to you because you played this dirty little trick and deprived the majority will of the Dirty South.  If Jedi is eliminated, Franzl will become president now simple as that because you went against your game reform ideals into cheap tricks

I'd appreciate it if you could only reply to my posts while sober, thanks.

If people don't want a regional legislature, they don't want it. Maybe you could stop attacking everyone who disagrees with you and vowing to get revenge against them and try and make the case for this regional legislature which is, according to you, objectively a good thing. And I still don't know what the "dirty little trick" you're referring to is, and saying that I preformed this trick is especially puzzling, as I don't even live in the Southeast. In fact, in the region I do live in, a legislature passed which I opposed, and I didn't even throw a temper tantrum about it and threaten to set up a shadow government! Graciously accepting the results of a free and fair election, imagine that!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on September 25, 2009, 03:07:19 PM
Apparently, in DWTL's mind: Governor of the Southeast illegally closes the voting booth and, in the process, disenfranchises at least one voter = Bacon King up to his dirty tricks?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: ilikeverin on September 26, 2009, 10:34:43 AM
There was no legitimate reason to oppose this legislature (something popular in every region proposed) except for cheap political purposes.

???


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 29, 2009, 11:56:14 AM
Isn't it about time we start deciding on when to hold a convention and a city and all that?

As usual, people should start nominating cities from each region

I'll give my 5:
Northeast: Boston, MA
Mideast: Baltimore, MD
Dirty South: Charleston, SC
Midwest: Milwaukee, WI
Pacific: Seattle, WA

I'd highly suggest having the convention in the Midwest or Dirty South


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on September 29, 2009, 12:04:58 PM
I would like to propose holding our convention in Indianapolis, Indiana. ;) Chicago would be nice too.



Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 29, 2009, 01:23:26 PM
I forgot what the protocol is, but I'm thinking maybe we should select the region first and then the city


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 29, 2009, 01:36:24 PM
Maybe we should have it in the Midwest since Jedi hails from there.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sam Spade on September 29, 2009, 01:43:48 PM
How about where DWTL lives, i.e. in his parents' basement where the inflatable dolls are found?

You know, Sh!thole, NJ, though I consider that town name redundant.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Devilman88 on September 29, 2009, 02:37:50 PM
Kansas city, mo...


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 29, 2009, 02:39:53 PM
Duke, I petition you as the chair to open a vote on which region to have the convention in


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 29, 2009, 02:49:00 PM
Convention in San Diego, CA. A strong military city, beautiful weather, a Republican background, multi-cultured. It's a perfect spot.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 29, 2009, 02:50:03 PM
Convention in San Diego, CA. A strong military city, beautiful weather, a Republican background, multi-cultured. It's a perfect spot.
What would be the point in holding our convention in the most hostile region?  I think the Midwest is our best bet because Jedi is our candidate


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 29, 2009, 02:52:57 PM
Convention in San Diego, CA. A strong military city, beautiful weather, a Republican background, multi-cultured. It's a perfect spot.
What would be the point in holding our convention in the most hostile region?  I think the Midwest is our best bet because Jedi is our candidate

Because the Midwest is a boring ass region. Denver is the only option. Anyways, the GOP 2004 convention was in NYC. San Diego is a fine location. If not, then I propose Philadelphia.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 29, 2009, 02:54:59 PM
Well, having a vote on the region is certainly the first step.  After that, exact city details can be hammered out.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on September 29, 2009, 02:55:17 PM
Once again, I encourage all voters, especially those from the Mideast,  to support having the convention in the Mideast. Bringing tourism in should help boost our struggling economy.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 29, 2009, 02:55:54 PM
I vote for the Northeast region, with it's deep history, beautiful locations, and our VP's region.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 29, 2009, 02:59:29 PM
I have not decided on my vote yet, but it will not be the Pacific or the Mideast.  The two regions just aren't where we need to be right now.

The Midwest is Jedi's home, the Northeast is AndrewCT's home, and the Dirty South is the RPP's home


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 29, 2009, 03:00:11 PM
I have not decided on my vote yet, but it will not be the Pacific or the Mideast.  The two regions just aren't where we need to be right now.

The Midwest is Jedi's home, the Northeast is AndrewCT's home, and the Dirty South is the RPP's home

No


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 29, 2009, 03:02:37 PM
No?  The Dirty South is the home of the RPP, its where the party was founded and where the chairman is from.  We certainly have branched out beyond being a purely Dirty South party, but that does not change history or fact


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 29, 2009, 03:04:23 PM
No?  The Dirty South is the home of the RPP, its where the party was founded and where the chairman is from.  We certainly have branched out beyond being a purely Dirty South party, but that does not change history or fact

The RPP has a presence in every region, in fact we might have more registered in the Mideast than the Dirty South. Just because your Fantasy Five RPPers are in the South doesn't mean that is our party.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 29, 2009, 03:09:03 PM
No?  The Dirty South is the home of the RPP, its where the party was founded and where the chairman is from.  We certainly have branched out beyond being a purely Dirty South party, but that does not change history or fact

The RPP has a presence in every region, in fact we might have more registered in the Mideast than the Dirty South. Just because your Fantasy Five RPPers are in the South doesn't mean that is our party.
It is the home of the party, its not the only location but it is the home.  That's like denying that the JCP's home is the Pacific.  The fact is the original mission of the RPP was preservation of the Dirty South and that remains intrical


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 29, 2009, 04:28:55 PM
Is anyone planning on calling an approval vote on the chair at the next convention?  If so, I suggest they do it now so that the possible candidates for chair can make their positions for the direction of the RPP known if the motion of no confidence passes


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 29, 2009, 04:29:55 PM
Is anyone planning on calling an approval vote on the chair at the next convention?  If so, I suggest they do it now so that the possible candidates for chair can make their positions for the direction of the RPP known if the motion of no confidence passes

There is no need to change our chairman. Why would we?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 29, 2009, 04:31:48 PM
Is anyone planning on calling an approval vote on the chair at the next convention?  If so, I suggest they do it now so that the possible candidates for chair can make their positions for the direction of the RPP known if the motion of no confidence passes

There is no need to change our chairman. Why would we?
Of course there is no reason, but does not mean some power hungry party member is not going to try and grab it from a founding member.  I would will make it clear again, however, that if Duke or Brandon is not the chair, I am leaving the party because the direction of this ship is lost.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 29, 2009, 04:32:43 PM
Is anyone planning on calling an approval vote on the chair at the next convention?  If so, I suggest they do it now so that the possible candidates for chair can make their positions for the direction of the RPP known if the motion of no confidence passes

There is no need to change our chairman. Why would we?
Of course there is no reason, but does not mean some power hungry party member is not going to try and grab it from a founding member.  I would will make it clear again, however, that if Duke or Brandon is not the chair, I am leaving the party because the direction of this ship is lost.

That is equally pointless. I do agree that Brandon H and Duke are really our only options though.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on September 29, 2009, 04:49:15 PM
Since Duke isn't on right now, I'll briefly take over and open a vote on which region to host our convention in...

Vote for the region where you want our party convention to take place.

Voting has begun. The vote ends in 24 hours.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 29, 2009, 04:50:39 PM
1. Northeast
2. Pacific
3. Mideast
4. Midwest
5. Dirty South


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Devilman88 on September 29, 2009, 05:09:29 PM
midwest


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 29, 2009, 05:25:24 PM
The convention was held in the Dirty South during the period of great prosperity, but right now the region seems to have lost a bit of it's luster. There's no denying that the region is very special to the RPP and undoubtedly our birthplace. However, I think it's only appropriate that we hold it in Jedi's home region: the Midwest. Second would be the Northeast and third is, of course, the Dirty South.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 29, 2009, 05:38:59 PM
1.) Midwest
2.) Dirty South
3.) Northeast
4.) Mideast


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 29, 2009, 05:48:56 PM
Motion to expel Sewer Socialist using the Party Empowerment Act


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on September 29, 2009, 05:51:32 PM
1. Mideast
2. Northeast
3. Pacific
4. Midwest
5. Southeast Dirty South


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on September 29, 2009, 05:52:03 PM
Motion to expel Sewer Socialist using the Party Empowerment Act

You just love trying to expel people from your party.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on September 29, 2009, 05:53:49 PM
1.) Pacific
2.) Dirty South


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 29, 2009, 05:54:59 PM
Motion to expel Sewer Socialist using the Party Empowerment Act

You just love trying to expel people from your party.

Pretty much. Who knows who is next? You? Me? hmmm


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 29, 2009, 05:55:55 PM
1. Mideast
2. Northeast
3. Pacific
4. Midwest
5. Southeast
Automatic removal from the party for using the incorrect term to describe Atlasia's premier region


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 29, 2009, 05:56:32 PM
1. Mideast
2. Northeast
3. Pacific
4. Midwest
5. Southeast
Automatic removal from the party for using the incorrect term to describe Atlasia's premier region

lol


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: big bad fab on September 29, 2009, 06:02:51 PM
1. Mideast
2. Midwest
3. Northeast
4. Pacific
5. Dirty South


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on September 29, 2009, 06:08:13 PM
Motion to expel Sewer Socialist using the Party Empowerment Act

Nay.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on September 29, 2009, 06:09:57 PM
Motion to expel Alexander Hamilton using the Party Empowerment Act.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 29, 2009, 06:14:16 PM
Motion to expel Alexander Hamilton using the Party Empowerment Act.

Abstain


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Daniel Adams on September 29, 2009, 06:24:26 PM
1. Dirty South
2. Midwest
3. Northeast
4. Mideast
5. Pacific


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: ajc0918 on September 29, 2009, 07:14:30 PM
1. Mideast
2. Northeast
3. Pacific
4. Midwest
5. Southeast


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 29, 2009, 07:27:00 PM
1. Mideast
2. Northeast
3. Pacific
4. Midwest
5. Southeast
Some people are just asking to be removed from the party....


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on September 29, 2009, 07:31:33 PM
1. Mideast
2. Northeast
3. Pacific
4. Midwest
5. Southeast
Some people are just asking to be removed from the party....

Look at your signature.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 29, 2009, 07:35:14 PM
1. Mideast
2. Northeast
3. Pacific
4. Midwest
5. Southeast
Some people are just asking to be removed from the party....

Look at your signature.
That was from the dark days of the Southeast before our re-birth as the Dirty South


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 29, 2009, 07:51:20 PM
Also note we will only be running candidates in the Southeast


Any question where the home of this party is?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Ogis on September 29, 2009, 07:52:59 PM
DWTL, what's with the change in party name? Southern Seccessionist Party?


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 29, 2009, 07:55:30 PM
Also note we will only be running candidates in the Southeast


Any question where the home of this party is?

That was a different party, a party that never would've reached where the current RPP is.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 29, 2009, 08:01:14 PM
Also note we will only be running candidates in the Southeast


Any question where the home of this party is?

That was a different party, a party that never would've reached where the current RPP is.
They are the same thing, the RPP was simply a name change once we dropped secession.


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 29, 2009, 08:05:10 PM
Also note we will only be running candidates in the Southeast


Any question where the home of this party is?

That was a different party, a party that never would've reached where the current RPP is.
They are the same thing, the RPP was simply a name change once we dropped secession.

They had ENTIRELY different goals, aims, and appeals.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 29, 2009, 08:08:53 PM
They?  Who is they?  You mean the people in charge of the RPP now?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 29, 2009, 08:15:52 PM
They?  Who is they?  You mean the people in charge of the RPP now?

Precisely


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: FloridaRepublican on September 29, 2009, 08:58:55 PM
Dirty South


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on September 29, 2009, 09:11:36 PM
1. Mideast
2. Pacific
3. Midwest
4. Dirty South
5. Northeast


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 29, 2009, 09:20:43 PM
After a year and a great run, this party is not what it was.  Its a sham and its a shame.  The members have truly lost their way and I hope that they can find it.  For those of you who wish to truly preserve regional rights I urge you to join the new party I will be creating that will basically be what the RPP before I took my long hiatus.  For now, I will be in the JCP helping to dismantle this sham RPP


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on September 29, 2009, 11:10:54 PM
Funny. I feel like DWTL's departure from the RPP will, in the end, have less of an impact on the party than that one day when PiT, Tmth, Rowan and Hamilton did some switching shortly after Ben and Vepres joined the DA.

Of course, I don't doubt for a second there is a lot of PMing going on right now.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 29, 2009, 11:11:47 PM
Funny. I feel like DWTL's departure from the RPP will, in the end, have less of an impact on the party than that one day when PiT, Tmth, Rowan and Hamilton did some switching shortly after Ben and Vepres joined the DA.

Of course, I don't doubt for a second there is a lot of PMing going on right now.

I have never left this party and don't intend to. Also, I know for pretty certain there is no PMing going on regarding this event.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on September 29, 2009, 11:17:25 PM
Funny. I feel like DWTL's departure from the RPP will, in the end, have less of an impact on the party than that one day when PiT, Tmth, Rowan and Hamilton did some switching shortly after Ben and Vepres joined the DA.

Of course, I don't doubt for a second there is a lot of PMing going on right now.

I have never left this party and don't intend to. Also, I know for pretty certain there is no PMing going on regarding this event.

My mistake. I forget who the fourth one was. It was a pretty crazy day and I came at the tail end so a lot mushes together.

As for behind the scenes stuff, if no one is PMing DWTL right now about this (which is insanely doubtful) then my thoughts are confirmed. This means nothing for the RPP except help its image.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 29, 2009, 11:19:39 PM
Funny. I feel like DWTL's departure from the RPP will, in the end, have less of an impact on the party than that one day when PiT, Tmth, Rowan and Hamilton did some switching shortly after Ben and Vepres joined the DA.

Of course, I don't doubt for a second there is a lot of PMing going on right now.

I have never left this party and don't intend to. Also, I know for pretty certain there is no PMing going on regarding this event.

My mistake. I forget who the fourth one was. It was a pretty crazy day and I came at the tail end so a lot mushes together.

As for behind the scenes stuff, if no one is PMing DWTL right now about this (which is insanely doubtful) then my thoughts are confirmed. This means nothing for the RPP except help its image.

The fourth one was NiK, who was very new and got confused with what was going on. I am certain that he was not in anyway trying to use the DA for political gain and has nothing but respect for all Atlasians.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on September 29, 2009, 11:51:48 PM
Funny. I feel like DWTL's departure from the RPP will, in the end, have less of an impact on the party than that one day when PiT, Tmth, Rowan and Hamilton did some switching shortly after Ben and Vepres joined the DA.

Of course, I don't doubt for a second there is a lot of PMing going on right now.

I have never left this party and don't intend to. Also, I know for pretty certain there is no PMing going on regarding this event.

My mistake. I forget who the fourth one was. It was a pretty crazy day and I came at the tail end so a lot mushes together.

As for behind the scenes stuff, if no one is PMing DWTL right now about this (which is insanely doubtful) then my thoughts are confirmed. This means nothing for the RPP except help its image.

The fourth one was NiK, who was very new and got confused with what was going on. I am certain that he was not in anyway trying to use the DA for political gain and has nothing but respect for all Atlasians.

     Hey, so do I. ;) I needed to return to prevent Duke from closing down the RPP, but apparently someone has issues with those damn uppity non-founders. :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 29, 2009, 11:54:30 PM
Funny. I feel like DWTL's departure from the RPP will, in the end, have less of an impact on the party than that one day when PiT, Tmth, Rowan and Hamilton did some switching shortly after Ben and Vepres joined the DA.

Of course, I don't doubt for a second there is a lot of PMing going on right now.

I have never left this party and don't intend to. Also, I know for pretty certain there is no PMing going on regarding this event.

My mistake. I forget who the fourth one was. It was a pretty crazy day and I came at the tail end so a lot mushes together.

As for behind the scenes stuff, if no one is PMing DWTL right now about this (which is insanely doubtful) then my thoughts are confirmed. This means nothing for the RPP except help its image.

The fourth one was NiK, who was very new and got confused with what was going on. I am certain that he was not in anyway trying to use the DA for political gain and has nothing but respect for all Atlasians.

     Hey, so do I. I needed to return to prevent Duke from closing down the RPP, but apparently someone has issues with those damn uppity non-founders. :P

Founding a party doesn't make a party. We all built the party together with our own contributions and I can only speak for myself but I had no option of even being a founder. :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on September 29, 2009, 11:57:52 PM
Funny. I feel like DWTL's departure from the RPP will, in the end, have less of an impact on the party than that one day when PiT, Tmth, Rowan and Hamilton did some switching shortly after Ben and Vepres joined the DA.

Of course, I don't doubt for a second there is a lot of PMing going on right now.

I have never left this party and don't intend to. Also, I know for pretty certain there is no PMing going on regarding this event.

My mistake. I forget who the fourth one was. It was a pretty crazy day and I came at the tail end so a lot mushes together.

As for behind the scenes stuff, if no one is PMing DWTL right now about this (which is insanely doubtful) then my thoughts are confirmed. This means nothing for the RPP except help its image.

The fourth one was NiK, who was very new and got confused with what was going on. I am certain that he was not in anyway trying to use the DA for political gain and has nothing but respect for all Atlasians.

     Hey, so do I. I needed to return to prevent Duke from closing down the RPP, but apparently someone has issues with those damn uppity non-founders. :P

Founding a party doesn't make a party. We all built the party together with our own contributions and I can only speak for myself but I had no option of even being a founder. :P

     I took the plunge, moving from my native region to take part, before Duke or Brandon even re-registered, but I'm not a founder. :P But apparently, this is the party of DWTL, Duke, SPC, & Brandon H, & everyone else is just along for the ride.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 29, 2009, 11:59:04 PM
Funny. I feel like DWTL's departure from the RPP will, in the end, have less of an impact on the party than that one day when PiT, Tmth, Rowan and Hamilton did some switching shortly after Ben and Vepres joined the DA.

Of course, I don't doubt for a second there is a lot of PMing going on right now.

I have never left this party and don't intend to. Also, I know for pretty certain there is no PMing going on regarding this event.

My mistake. I forget who the fourth one was. It was a pretty crazy day and I came at the tail end so a lot mushes together.

As for behind the scenes stuff, if no one is PMing DWTL right now about this (which is insanely doubtful) then my thoughts are confirmed. This means nothing for the RPP except help its image.

The fourth one was NiK, who was very new and got confused with what was going on. I am certain that he was not in anyway trying to use the DA for political gain and has nothing but respect for all Atlasians.

     Hey, so do I. I needed to return to prevent Duke from closing down the RPP, but apparently someone has issues with those damn uppity non-founders. :P

Founding a party doesn't make a party. We all built the party together with our own contributions and I can only speak for myself but I had no option of even being a founder. :P

     I took the plunge, moving from my native region to take part, before Duke or Brandon even re-registered, but I'm not a founder. :P But apparently, this is the party of DWTL, Duke, SPC, & Brandon H, & everyone else is just along for the ride.

I recall you did more to turn this into a real party at the start than anyone else. Or is the first set of pages in this thread a mere illusion?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on September 30, 2009, 12:10:18 AM
No. 4 was Hamilton. NiK was involved too, but only as a follower.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 30, 2009, 12:11:25 AM
No. 4 was Hamilton. NiK was involved too, but only as a follower.

No. I have never left this party. You can check the New Register Thread.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on September 30, 2009, 12:12:48 AM
No. 4 was Hamilton. NiK was involved too, but only as a follower.

No. I have never left this party. You can check the New Register Thread.

Obviously. You weren't online.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 30, 2009, 12:16:53 AM
No. 4 was Hamilton. NiK was involved too, but only as a follower.

No. I have never left this party. You can check the New Register Thread.

Obviously. You weren't online.

When tmthforu is back online, I'll have to have him confirm. I never wanted to leave for the DA, and had consistently argued that it was a poor choice, if Vepres on he may be able to confirm as well.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Devilman88 on September 30, 2009, 02:27:15 AM
i should have my computer today, but i think we need to go ahead and pick a city and start. We have alot of things to do.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 30, 2009, 02:28:28 AM
i should have my computer today, but i think we need to go ahead and pick a city and start. We have alot of things to do.

We already decided it's between San Diego and Philadelphia. :)


Maybe only I decided...


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: big bad fab on September 30, 2009, 06:05:25 AM
After a year and a great run, this party is not what it was, thanks GodItsMy chairmanship was a sham and its a shame.  The membersI have truly lost their my way and I hope that theyI can find it.  For those of you who wish to truly preserve regional rightsmy own little power I urge you to join the new party I will be creating that will basically be what the RPP before I took my long hiatusscrewed it up.  For now, I will be in the JCP helping to dismantle this sham RPP

I'm sorry to do this as it's not in my nature, but I must say I'm fed up with this pride, this vanity, this futility, this boyishness.

Now, I urge all the forumers to think again about joining a party led by an open and moderate chairman, AHDuke, with members from progressive (Hamilton), moderate (NiK, Tmth), libertarian (PiT), conservative, etc, origins.

A party which can now be at ease, quiet, pacified. And really open, which is quite rare in Atlasia.

Join the RPP !
The Rosy and Peppermint Party ! ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 30, 2009, 06:48:38 AM
PMing isn't as much as an issue as the pleas are more coming from the private board.  The main concern seems to be that the party for the most part shares my concerns, but does not want to abandon Jedi, for that reason I plan to announce in the coming days a new party that will be, well, the RPP when the RPP was the RPP


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on September 30, 2009, 07:05:37 AM
Wow.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on September 30, 2009, 09:11:04 AM
Typical childish behavior.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Devilman88 on September 30, 2009, 09:23:15 AM
I have to say any party that is run by dwtl, i will not be joining.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: big bad fab on September 30, 2009, 10:04:01 AM
That's why, generally speaking,

I urge all the forumers to think again about joining a party led by an open and moderate chairman, AHDuke, with members from progressive (Hamilton), moderate (NiK, Tmth), libertarian (PiT), conservative, etc, origins.

A party which can now be at ease, quiet, pacified. And really open, which is quite rare in Atlasia.

Join the RPP !
The Rosy and Peppermint Party ! ;)

Join the Relieved and Peaceful Party !
Join the Respectful and Polite Party !
Join the Really Popular Party !
Join the RPP !
Welcome !


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on September 30, 2009, 10:17:36 AM
I have to say any party that is run by dwtl, i will not be joining.

And you had no problems with this before.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 30, 2009, 10:18:08 AM
I have to say any party that is run by dwtl, i will not be joining.

And you had no problems with this before.

Yes he did


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 30, 2009, 10:24:21 AM
After a number of conversations have assauged my concerns, I am returning the party and ready to lead us back to dominance


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on September 30, 2009, 10:28:29 AM
lol


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Mechaman on September 30, 2009, 10:28:46 AM
After a number of conversations have assauged my concerns, I am returning the party and ready to lead us back to dominance

LOL,

you are so spineless you can't even get yourself to stay committed to your grudges.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 30, 2009, 11:00:35 AM
After a number of conversations have assauged my concerns, I am returning the party and ready to lead us back to dominance

LOL,

you are so spineless you can't even get yourself to stay committed to your grudges.
I only left to make a point


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 30, 2009, 11:26:45 AM
During my time as the chairman of the RPP, I've seen more drama than what is seen a full season of The Hills.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 30, 2009, 11:32:23 AM
During my time as the chairman of the RPP, I've seen more drama than what is seen a full season of The Hills.
Figured it was my turn to contribute :), but seriously I received assurances that this drama is going to stop, if it doesn't, then there will be real reason to leave for good.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Devilman88 on September 30, 2009, 12:38:10 PM
duke are you running for chair again?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on September 30, 2009, 01:14:22 PM
Try removing the source of the drama, that usually helps.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on September 30, 2009, 01:20:18 PM
After a number of conversations have assauged my concerns, I am returning the party and ready to lead us back to dominance

LOL,

you are so spineless you can't even get yourself to stay committed to your grudges.
I only left to make a point

I missed what the point was. This hardly made a splash and, from what I can tell, your departure was probably helpful for the party while it lasted. Oh well.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 30, 2009, 02:00:53 PM
I missed what the point was. This hardly made a splash and, from what I can tell, your departure was probably helpful for the party while it lasted. Oh well.
My point was that bitching and drama were killing our party and that we need to return to where we were in December or so.  It looks like the party is willing to do that, so I'm staying for now. 


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 30, 2009, 03:22:53 PM
Can someone get a vote tally on the region for the convention?  I think once we do that we can pick a city quite soon and hopefully get the ball on a longer than usual convention where we can hammer out all that is troubling us.  Now that I am assured there are not going to be any convention surprises, it should be rather smooth.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: big bad fab on September 30, 2009, 03:24:22 PM
Can someone get a vote tally on the region for the convention?  I think once we do that we can pick a city quite soon and hopefully get the ball on a longer than usual convention where we can hammer out all that is troubling us.  Now that I am assured there are not going to be any convention surprises, it should be rather smooth.

I'm pretty sure it's the RPP here, not the ORPP.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 30, 2009, 03:26:10 PM
If the Silver Regional Protection Party was the same thing as the Regional Protection Party, then Original Regional Protection Party is the same as Regional Protection Party.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 30, 2009, 03:27:19 PM
The Original RPP is a five member group. The RPP is not a five member group.


Midwest wins. Denver is nominated.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 30, 2009, 03:28:58 PM
And I say, let them eat pudding!!

()

I plan to give a long speech on the problems facing us and how together we can correct them and run a better party.  I never like to agree with Jas, but he is right in that I have always tried to emulate the way the JCP is run because they are so effective.  The worst thing I ever did was stepping down as chair because it created too much choas inside the party.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on September 30, 2009, 03:29:16 PM
The Original RPP is a five member group. The RPP is not a five member group.


Midwest wins. Denver is nominated.
The voting is open for another hour. So the Midwest hasn't won yet.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 30, 2009, 03:29:41 PM
The Original RPP is a five member group. The RPP is not a five member group.


Midwest wins. Denver is nominated.
The ORPP is quite similar to the DFL


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: HappyWarrior on September 30, 2009, 03:32:27 PM
And I say, let them eat pudding!!

()

I plan to give a long speech on the problems facing us and how together we can correct them and run a better party.  I never like to agree with Jas, but he is right in that I have always tried to emulate the way the JCP is run because they are so effective.  The worst thing I ever did was stepping down as chair because it created too much choas inside the party.


God you are an egomaniac aren't you?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 30, 2009, 03:33:45 PM
The RPP was doing much better when I was chair.  We have two signifigant downturns, when I took a long break and since I stepped down as chair.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: big bad fab on September 30, 2009, 03:35:27 PM
The RPP was doing much better when I was chair.  We have two signifigant downturns, when I took a long break and since I stepped down as chair.

YOU are a chaos.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 30, 2009, 03:37:21 PM
We haven't hit a downturn. Our downturn was the sh**t known as August 2009 federal election. We are about to surpass all previous performances. October, December, and February- look for it.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on September 30, 2009, 03:59:34 PM
     I'd like to switch Midwest & Mideast's places in my vote, if that is permissible. ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on September 30, 2009, 04:05:20 PM
     I'd like to switch Midwest & Mideast's places in my vote, if that is permissible. ;)
I think it would be fine if you did that. I don't know where it says in the bylaws that you can't change your vote while the booth is open.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on September 30, 2009, 05:29:14 PM
The worst thing I ever did was stepping down as chair because it created too much choas inside the party.

Like when I left the SDP, eh?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on September 30, 2009, 05:34:25 PM
The worst thing I ever did was stepping down as chair because it created too much choas inside the party.

Like when I left the SDP, eh?
I left the as the party's most decorated electoral winner and a successful chair.  I left on my own accords to show that our party would not escape criticism because I was not the chair.  You got booted out of an already unsuccesful party because you commited a crime


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on September 30, 2009, 05:35:21 PM
Its probably to late to vote, but If I could of this is what it would have looked like

1. Northeast
2. Dirty South
3. Midwest
4. Mideast
5. Pacific


 


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on September 30, 2009, 05:36:47 PM
The worst thing I ever did was stepping down as chair because it created too much choas inside the party.

Like when I left the SDP, eh?
I left the as the party's most decorated electoral winner and a successful chair.  I left on my own accords to show that our party would not escape criticism because I was not the chair.  You got booted out of an already unsuccesful party because you commited a crime

You haven't got any decorations. No matter how many yes-men you surround yourself with, you can't win. You're still the pariah of Atlasia. You always will be.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Lief 🗽 on September 30, 2009, 05:42:11 PM
The worst thing I ever did was stepping down as chair because it created too much choas inside the party.

Like when I left the SDP, eh?
I left the as the party's most decorated electoral winner and a successful chair.  I left on my own accords to show that our party would not escape criticism because I was not the chair.  You got booted out of an already unsuccesful party because you commited a crime

You haven't got any decorations. No matter how many yes-men you surround yourself with, you can't win. You're still the pariah of Atlasia. You always will be.

Also, sorry to burst your bubble DWDL, but if I remember correctly, the unsuccessful SDP did better or as well as than the successful RPP in pretty much every election.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 30, 2009, 05:45:51 PM
The worst thing I ever did was stepping down as chair because it created too much choas inside the party.

Like when I left the SDP, eh?
I left the as the party's most decorated electoral winner and a successful chair.  I left on my own accords to show that our party would not escape criticism because I was not the chair.  You got booted out of an already unsuccesful party because you commited a crime

You haven't got any decorations. No matter how many yes-men you surround yourself with, you can't win. You're still the pariah of Atlasia. You always will be.

Also, sorry to burst your bubble DWDL, but if I remember correctly, the unsuccessful SDP did better or as well as than the successful RPP in pretty much every election.

You lost in April.  AND JUNE!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Lief 🗽 on September 30, 2009, 05:52:14 PM
The worst thing I ever did was stepping down as chair because it created too much choas inside the party.

Like when I left the SDP, eh?
I left the as the party's most decorated electoral winner and a successful chair.  I left on my own accords to show that our party would not escape criticism because I was not the chair.  You got booted out of an already unsuccesful party because you commited a crime

You haven't got any decorations. No matter how many yes-men you surround yourself with, you can't win. You're still the pariah of Atlasia. You always will be.

Also, sorry to burst your bubble DWDL, but if I remember correctly, the unsuccessful SDP did better or as well as than the successful RPP in pretty much every election.

You lost in April.  AND JUNE!

We both lost a seat in April (and by that time the SDP was a decrepit shell anyway). And I'm pretty sure I won in June. Let me just check... yup, yup I did.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 30, 2009, 06:06:31 PM
The worst thing I ever did was stepping down as chair because it created too much choas inside the party.

Like when I left the SDP, eh?
I left the as the party's most decorated electoral winner and a successful chair.  I left on my own accords to show that our party would not escape criticism because I was not the chair.  You got booted out of an already unsuccesful party because you commited a crime

You haven't got any decorations. No matter how many yes-men you surround yourself with, you can't win. You're still the pariah of Atlasia. You always will be.

Also, sorry to burst your bubble DWDL, but if I remember correctly, the unsuccessful SDP did better or as well as than the successful RPP in pretty much every election.

You lost in April.  AND JUNE!

We both lost a seat in April (and by that time the SDP was a decrepit shell anyway). And I'm pretty sure I won in June. Let me just check... yup, yup I did.

Debatable.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on September 30, 2009, 06:11:59 PM
rofl


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 30, 2009, 06:17:11 PM

You weren't invited.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on September 30, 2009, 06:17:14 PM
The voting booth closed at 5:49, so your vote doesn't count Yank. Sorry :(
I'm not 100% sure whether or not DWTL's vote should be counted, since he didn't vote again after rejoining the party, and he is currently under the ORPP, not the RPP. I went ahead and counted it, since it didn't affect the outcome.
(If anyone finds an error, or if I missed a vote, please let me know. It was hard to go through since there were so many posts that had nothing to do with the vote)

Results:
First Count-
Mideast - 4 (Tmthforu94, Big Bad Fab, ajc0918, PiT)
Midwest - 3 (Duke, devilman88, DWTL)
Dirty South - 2 (Daniel Adams, floridarepub)
Northeast - 1 (Hamilton)
Pacific - 0
Northeast and Pacific are eliminated

Second Count-
Mideast - 5 (Tmthforu94, Big Bad Fab, ajc0918, PiT, Hamilton)
Midwest - 3 (duke, devilman88, DWTL)
Dirty South - 2 (Daniel Adams, floridarepub)
Dirty South is eliminated

Final Count-
Mideast - 5 (Tmthforu94, Big Bad Fab, ajc0918, PiT, Hamilton)
Midwest - 4 (duke, devilman88, DWTL, Daniel Adams)

The RPP October convention will be held in the Mideast region. Nominations are now being accepted for which city to host it in.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on September 30, 2009, 06:19:44 PM
Detroit, Michigan. But really if its Detroit, Indianapolis, Cincinnati, Cleveland, or Chicago I would be happy with any of those old Industrial heartland cities.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 30, 2009, 06:20:04 PM
CHICAGO


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on September 30, 2009, 06:44:14 PM
I would be fine with any city, though Chicago and Indianapolis top my list.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on September 30, 2009, 06:59:31 PM
HEY YOU FUCKER YOU SKIPED ME.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 30, 2009, 07:01:17 PM

You were relinquished using the Party Empowerment Act.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on September 30, 2009, 07:04:16 PM

WAS NOT. >:(


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on September 30, 2009, 07:04:42 PM

Would you please be so kind as to watch you language, you uncivilized savage. This is the RPP HQ not the LNF's shed in the Minnesota backwoods.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 30, 2009, 07:04:53 PM

Actually, we conducted a "secret" vote. You're gone.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on September 30, 2009, 07:05:42 PM

PROFF???


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on September 30, 2009, 07:06:47 PM

Sorry.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on September 30, 2009, 07:07:05 PM
SECURITY!!!!!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 30, 2009, 07:07:16 PM

Quote
Secret Vote Tally: Bye Sewer: 12 Keep Sewer: 2

sorry :'(


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on September 30, 2009, 07:07:48 PM
I'm sorry.
Even with your vote included, the Mideast would still win.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on September 30, 2009, 07:08:38 PM


That's not proof.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on September 30, 2009, 07:36:15 PM
Still conducting party business in private?

My Duke, what a reformer you are!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 30, 2009, 07:36:48 PM
Still conducting party business in private?

My Duke, what a reformer you are!

It was a joke.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on September 30, 2009, 07:38:47 PM

Guards, throw everyone out that looks suspicious and doesn't have RPP credentials!!!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 30, 2009, 07:39:54 PM

We have to have credentials now? What kind of despotic totalitarian freak show is this?!?!? :'(


BTW Marokai: This is a joke as well.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 30, 2009, 07:40:28 PM

He knows that. Just leave him be.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on September 30, 2009, 07:41:46 PM

So am I still in the party?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 30, 2009, 07:42:31 PM

You are in the LNF.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on September 30, 2009, 07:42:46 PM

We have to have credentials now? What kind of despotic totalitarian freak show is this?!?!? :'(




The answer in your own words.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 30, 2009, 07:44:32 PM

You conveniently cut out the part of my post that said that was also a joke :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on September 30, 2009, 07:45:32 PM

No.


Sewer Socialist
Regional Protection Party
Awe


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on September 30, 2009, 07:47:22 PM


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on September 30, 2009, 07:50:35 PM

You conveniently cut out the part of my post that said that was also a joke :P

I clicked insert quote it should have been there. I didn't notice your fine print. Look at it this way, I am magnifying it for those who have sight problems.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Psychic Octopus on September 30, 2009, 07:51:04 PM
Chicago'd be a good place.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on September 30, 2009, 07:52:53 PM
Indianapolis!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on September 30, 2009, 08:28:52 PM


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on September 30, 2009, 08:31:14 PM
We're the last party you joined and Duke hasn't expelled you, so I would say so.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on September 30, 2009, 08:32:11 PM

Ok good.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Brandon H on September 30, 2009, 10:56:12 PM

We have to have credentials now? What kind of despotic totalitarian freak show is this?!?!? :'(

Well every convention I have been to or seen on TV have had credentials committees, but this is not a convention.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: big bad fab on October 01, 2009, 03:09:36 AM
My friends, just ignore Sewer.

Well, I could have been tempted to put forward a big city from Ohio (;)).
Though I'd be pleased with Chicago,

Milwaukee would be a good choice.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: big bad fab on October 01, 2009, 03:18:04 AM
Oh and DWTL's vote shouldn't have counted in "first" round, since he is a member of the ORPP, not the RPP.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 01, 2009, 03:21:09 AM
Oh and DWTL's vote shouldn't have counted in "first" round, since he is a member of the ORPP, not the RPP.

True


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Devilman88 on October 01, 2009, 08:17:27 AM
Oh and DWTL's vote shouldn't have counted in "first" round, since he is a member of the ORPP, not the RPP.

True

He shouldn't even be able to have an input. He's not even in the RPP. He's in the ORPP..


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 01, 2009, 10:54:26 AM
Oh and DWTL's vote shouldn't have counted in "first" round, since he is a member of the ORPP, not the RPP.
Thanks but I think I know the party I founded a little better than you do.  As to whether my vote counts, the precedent is there that it does


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on October 01, 2009, 04:45:56 PM

Milwaukee is home to crime and socialists.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 01, 2009, 04:46:58 PM

Sewer socialists


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on October 01, 2009, 04:55:57 PM
Eugene Debs(A Socialist) got 30.16% of the vote in Milwaukee.

And he was in prison.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 01, 2009, 04:57:22 PM
Eugene Debs(A Socialist) got 30.16% of the vote in Milwaukee.

And he was in prison.

Sewer Socialism was a term, originally more or less pejorative, for the American socialist movement that centered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on October 01, 2009, 05:03:26 PM
Eugene Debs(A Socialist) got 30.16% of the vote in Milwaukee.

And he was in prison.

Sewer Socialism was a term, originally more or less pejorative, for the American socialist movement that centered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

I nwo that.

That is why I am Sewer Socialist.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on October 01, 2009, 05:07:32 PM

Sewer socialists = Socialists.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on October 01, 2009, 07:23:25 PM
I'm going to go ahead and move things along my starting a vote on which city in the Mideast region to host our convention...

Vote for which city you want our party convention to take place.

The choices:
Chicago, Illinois
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Indianapolis, Indiana
Detroit, Michigan


Voting has begun. The vote ends in 24 hours.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on October 01, 2009, 07:27:59 PM
Indianapolis.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 01, 2009, 07:28:22 PM
Chicago
Milwaukee
Write-in: The other cities just suck and I'm going to write-in "somewhere in West Virginia"


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 01, 2009, 07:29:02 PM
1. Detroit
2. Indianapolis
3. Milwaukee
4. Chicago


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 01, 2009, 07:32:37 PM
Chicago
Milwaukee
Write-in: The other cities just suck and I'm going to write-in "somewhere in West Virginia"

Detroit is a great city with a rich history. Its not there fault they got screwed over by so many people, primarily the American Middle class in the Car showrooms and opted against the Detroit made vehicles. Its not there fault that the big three were mismanaged.

As for Indianapolis, I would like to know whats so bad about it?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 01, 2009, 07:34:45 PM
Chicago
Milwaukee
Write-in: The other cities just suck and I'm going to write-in "somewhere in West Virginia"

Detroit is a great city with a rich history. Its not there fault they got screwed over by so many people, primarily the American Middle class in the Car showrooms and opted against the Detroit made vehicles. Its not there fault that the big three were mismanaged.

As for Indianapolis, I would like to know whats so bad about it?

Kwame Kilpatrick?

And Indianapolis, eh, it's one of those cities that's only good if it is voting GOP.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 01, 2009, 07:41:17 PM
Chicago
Milwaukee
Write-in: The other cities just suck and I'm going to write-in "somewhere in West Virginia"

Detroit is a great city with a rich history. Its not there fault they got screwed over by so many people, primarily the American Middle class in the Car showrooms and opted against the Detroit made vehicles. Its not there fault that the big three were mismanaged.

As for Indianapolis, I would like to know whats so bad about it?

Kwame Kilpatrick?

And Indianapolis, eh, it's one of those cities that's only good if it is voting GOP.

Its more Republican then Chicago.

As for Kilpatrick, like I said, they just keep getting screwed by everyone.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 01, 2009, 07:42:35 PM
Chicago
Milwaukee
Write-in: The other cities just suck and I'm going to write-in "somewhere in West Virginia"

Detroit is a great city with a rich history. Its not there fault they got screwed over by so many people, primarily the American Middle class in the Car showrooms and opted against the Detroit made vehicles. Its not there fault that the big three were mismanaged.

As for Indianapolis, I would like to know whats so bad about it?

Kwame Kilpatrick?

And Indianapolis, eh, it's one of those cities that's only good if it is voting GOP.

Its more Republican then Chicago.

As for Kilpatrick, like I said, they just keep getting screwed by everyone.

But Chicago is at least important, as well as being absolutely awesome (went there in 08)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on October 01, 2009, 08:05:26 PM
I'm going to have to vote with Sewer...

1. Indianapolis, Indiana
2. Chicago, Illinois
3. Milwaukee, Wisconsin
4. Detroit, Michigan

I'll be fine with just about any city. I only voted Indy because, with school, it will be difficult for me to travel up to Chicago each afternoon.
(If Indy is selected, I will be opening up our guest house if someone needs a place to stay)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 01, 2009, 08:38:08 PM
1. Indianapolis
2. Milwaukee


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on October 01, 2009, 10:07:54 PM
1. Camden, NJ
2. Newark, NJ


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Brandon H on October 01, 2009, 11:20:29 PM
Milwaukee


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 01, 2009, 11:21:36 PM


You aren't in the party. New Jersey sucks. Go away.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Devilman88 on October 01, 2009, 11:26:50 PM

1. Indianapolis
2. Milwaukee


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 01, 2009, 11:30:39 PM
1. Chicago
2. Milwaukee


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: big bad fab on October 02, 2009, 03:29:47 AM
1. Milwaukee
2. Indianapolis
3. Chicago
4. Detroit


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 03, 2009, 01:22:16 AM
Indianapolis wins unless you don't count SewerSocialist's vote. If we don't, then Milwaukee and Indianapolis are tied.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 03, 2009, 01:47:04 AM
We don't count his vote.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Smid on October 03, 2009, 02:29:29 AM
I didn't cast a vote, so would anyone object to me casting the deciding vote in favour of Milwaukee, in MasterJedi's homestate of Wisconsin?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 03, 2009, 02:29:57 AM
I didn't cast a vote, so would anyone object to me casting the deciding vote in favour of Milwaukee, in MasterJedi's homestate of Wisconsin?

Sounds fair.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: dead0man on October 03, 2009, 05:04:57 AM
Milwaukee


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 03, 2009, 05:54:53 AM
()

Here we have arrived


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on October 03, 2009, 08:51:50 AM

what.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on October 03, 2009, 08:55:19 AM
If he is a member of the party, then his vote should be counted. Sounds pretty Fascist not to count it. Then again, coming from Hamilton, I'm not surprised.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on October 03, 2009, 10:34:09 AM
Win is convention?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on October 03, 2009, 01:01:44 PM


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Lief 🗽 on October 03, 2009, 01:51:36 PM
If he is a member of the party, then his vote should be counted.

yeah...


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 03, 2009, 02:26:13 PM
Can someone open the convention?  Either Duke or Tmth I presume has to do it


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 03, 2009, 02:30:29 PM
tmth's position as Vice-Chair didn't automatically expire when he left the RPP?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 03, 2009, 03:07:19 PM
If he is a member of the party, then his vote should be counted. Sounds pretty Fascist not to count it. Then again, coming from Hamilton, I'm not surprised.


Shut the fuck up and get out of our convention. Sewer Socialist isn't even in the party.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on October 03, 2009, 03:09:57 PM
If he is a member of the party, then his vote should be counted. Sounds pretty Fascist not to count it. Then again, coming from Hamilton, I'm not surprised.


Shut the fuck up and get out of our convention. Sewer Socialist isn't even in the party.

I was whin he saed that.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 03, 2009, 03:10:41 PM
If he is a member of the party, then his vote should be counted. Sounds pretty Fascist not to count it. Then again, coming from Hamilton, I'm not surprised.


Shut the fuck up and get out of our convention. Sewer Socialist isn't even in the party.

I was whin he saed that.

No. You were not accepted.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on October 03, 2009, 03:12:12 PM
If he is a member of the party, then his vote should be counted. Sounds pretty Fascist not to count it. Then again, coming from Hamilton, I'm not surprised.


Shut the fuck up and get out of our convention. Sewer Socialist isn't even in the party.

I was whin he saed that.

No. You were not accepted.


T_T


WTF is "accepted"?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 03, 2009, 03:13:54 PM
If he is a member of the party, then his vote should be counted. Sounds pretty Fascist not to count it. Then again, coming from Hamilton, I'm not surprised.


Shut the fuck up and get out of our convention. Sewer Socialist isn't even in the party.

I was whin he saed that.

No. You were not accepted.


T_T


WTF is "accepted"?

No one motioned to keep Sewer after I motioned to remove you, therefore, you weren't accepted.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on October 03, 2009, 03:15:54 PM
If he is a member of the party, then his vote should be counted. Sounds pretty Fascist not to count it. Then again, coming from Hamilton, I'm not surprised.


Shut the fuck up and get out of our convention. Sewer Socialist isn't even in the party.

I was whin he saed that.

No. You were not accepted.


T_T


WTF is "accepted"?

No one motioned to keep Sewer after I motioned to remove you, therefore, you weren't accepted.

No one motioned to keep Hamilton after I motioned to remove you.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on October 03, 2009, 03:17:06 PM
Why does the RPP allow a troll like Hamilton in the party? I thought the party was better than that.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 03, 2009, 03:17:36 PM
Why does the RPP allow a troll like Hamilton in the party? I thought the party was better than that.

No, we're obviously not.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 03, 2009, 03:20:51 PM
Why does the RPP allow a troll like Hamilton in the party? I thought the party was better than that.

     Quit trolling our headquarters.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on October 03, 2009, 03:23:08 PM
Why does the RPP allow a troll like Hamilton in the party? I thought the party was better than that.

     Quit trolling our headquarters.

Stop arbitrarily ignoring members of the party(Sewer Socialist).


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 03, 2009, 03:24:54 PM
Why does the RPP allow a troll like Hamilton in the party? I thought the party was better than that.

     Quit trolling our headquarters.

Stop arbitrarily ignoring members of the party(Sewer Socialist).

We like Sewer more than the DA likes you :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 03, 2009, 03:29:54 PM
Why does the RPP allow a troll like Hamilton in the party? I thought the party was better than that.

     Quit trolling our headquarters.

Stop arbitrarily ignoring members of the party(Sewer Socialist).

     That was just an arbitrary decision of one member not supported by anyone else. So again, quit trolling our headquarters.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on October 03, 2009, 03:31:24 PM
Why does the RPP allow a troll like Hamilton in the party? I thought the party was better than that.

     Quit trolling our headquarters.

Stop arbitrarily ignoring members of the party(Sewer Socialist).

     That was just an arbitrary decision of one member not supported by anyone else. So again, quit trolling our headquarters.

So then why wasn't his vote counted?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 03, 2009, 03:31:56 PM
Why does the RPP allow a troll like Hamilton in the party? I thought the party was better than that.

     Quit trolling our headquarters.

Stop arbitrarily ignoring members of the party(Sewer Socialist).

     That was just an arbitrary decision of one member not supported by anyone else. So again, quit trolling our headquarters.

So then why wasn't his vote counted?

Because he left
No get the fuck out!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on October 03, 2009, 03:32:58 PM
Why does the RPP allow a troll like Hamilton in the party? I thought the party was better than that.

     Quit trolling our headquarters.

Stop arbitrarily ignoring members of the party(Sewer Socialist).

     That was just an arbitrary decision of one member not supported by anyone else. So again, quit trolling our headquarters.

So then why wasn't his vote counted?

Because he left
No get the fuck out!

I did not leve at that ponit


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 03, 2009, 03:34:15 PM
Why does the RPP allow a troll like Hamilton in the party? I thought the party was better than that.

     Quit trolling our headquarters.

Stop arbitrarily ignoring members of the party(Sewer Socialist).

     That was just an arbitrary decision of one member not supported by anyone else. So again, quit trolling our headquarters.

So then why wasn't his vote counted?

Because he left
No get the fuck out!

I did not leve at that ponit

Doesn't matter anymore


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 03, 2009, 03:35:37 PM
Why does the RPP allow a troll like Hamilton in the party? I thought the party was better than that.

     Quit trolling our headquarters.

Stop arbitrarily ignoring members of the party(Sewer Socialist).

     That was just an arbitrary decision of one member not supported by anyone else. So again, quit trolling our headquarters.

So then why wasn't his vote counted?

     Last time I checked, only certain members can make that sort of decision. Of course the RPP changes between being either an anarchist society or a feudal oligarchy depending on whichever suits you best.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on October 03, 2009, 03:36:15 PM
Out of curiousity...
Why wasn't Sewer Socialist's vote counted? He is a member of the party. The motion to expel him from the party didn't pass. He is legally in our party.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 03, 2009, 03:36:53 PM
Out of curiousity...
Why wasn't Sewer Socialist's vote counted? He is a member of the party. The motion to expel him from the party didn't pass. He is legally in our party.


He's in the JCP.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 03, 2009, 03:37:33 PM
Why does the RPP allow a troll like Hamilton in the party? I thought the party was better than that.

     Quit trolling our headquarters.

Stop arbitrarily ignoring members of the party(Sewer Socialist).

We like Sewer more than the DA likes you :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on October 03, 2009, 03:37:48 PM
Out of curiousity...
Why wasn't Sewer Socialist's vote counted? He is a member of the party. The motion to expel him from the party didn't pass. He is legally in our party.


He's in the JCP.

Not when he cast his vote. YOU decided to arbitrarily not count it.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 03, 2009, 03:38:48 PM
Out of curiousity...
Why wasn't Sewer Socialist's vote counted? He is a member of the party. The motion to expel him from the party didn't pass. He is legally in our party.


He's in the JCP.

Not when he cast his vote. YOU decided to arbitrarily not count it.

Good for me. Now GTFOH


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on October 03, 2009, 03:39:47 PM
Out of curiousity...
Why wasn't Sewer Socialist's vote counted? He is a member of the party. The motion to expel him from the party didn't pass. He is legally in our party.


He's in the JCP.

Not when he cast his vote. YOU decided to arbitrarily not count it.

Good for me. Now GTFOH

You have the maturity of a 5 year old.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 03, 2009, 03:40:22 PM
     I think a ruling on this would need to be handed down by the Chair, anyway.

     Actually, that reminds me. Did we ever replace our NE Chair?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 03, 2009, 03:41:12 PM

Because I don't want our convention to continue being interrupted by the least intelligent poster on this forum? Right. That makes me immature. You're the one that always has to bring me up when it doesn't even involve you or me.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on October 03, 2009, 03:41:27 PM
Seriously though, he was in the party when he voted, and when the voting closed. The fact that he is in the JCP now isn't much of an excuse, because he was in the RPP when voting began and ended.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 03, 2009, 03:41:48 PM
    I think a ruling on this would need to be handed down by the Chair, anyway.

     Actually, that reminds me. Did we ever replace our NE Chair?

No, because regional chairmanship doesn't work. Take the DS for example


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on October 03, 2009, 03:42:30 PM

Because I don't want our convention to continue being interrupted by the least intelligent poster on this forum? Right. That makes me immature. You're the one that always has to bring me up when it doesn't even involve you or me.

No, what makes you immature is that you throw these hissy fits when people call you out for hypocrisy and dishonesty.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 03, 2009, 03:42:41 PM
Seriously though, he was in the party when he voted, and when the voting closed. The fact that he is in the JCP now isn't much of an excuse, because he was in the RPP when voting began and ended.

Stop being ignorant. At the very least he was on chairman review because a motion was pressed. He is a joke poster who switches parties for no reason. Why did you make that stupid law if you aren't going to use it when it is needed?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 03, 2009, 03:43:09 PM

Because I don't want our convention to continue being interrupted by the least intelligent poster on this forum? Right. That makes me immature. You're the one that always has to bring me up when it doesn't even involve you or me.

No, what makes you immature is that you throw these hissy fits when people call you out for hypocrisy and dishonesty.

Because those claims are untrue and unwarranted. You're a jealous little troll.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on October 03, 2009, 03:44:45 PM

Because I don't want our convention to continue being interrupted by the least intelligent poster on this forum? Right. That makes me immature. You're the one that always has to bring me up when it doesn't even involve you or me.

No, what makes you immature is that you throw these hissy fits when people call you out for hypocrisy and dishonesty.

Because those claims are untrue and unwarranted. You're a jealous little troll.

Jealous of what?? LOL. I just want to know who died and made you chairman of the RPP.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 03, 2009, 03:46:32 PM

Because I don't want our convention to continue being interrupted by the least intelligent poster on this forum? Right. That makes me immature. You're the one that always has to bring me up when it doesn't even involve you or me.

No, what makes you immature is that you throw these hissy fits when people call you out for hypocrisy and dishonesty.

Because those claims are untrue and unwarranted. You're a jealous little troll.

Jealous of what??

Of everyone else. You're a fool. You bring nothing to the Senate. Awful bills, no amendments, nay, nay, nay. You love Bush. You love Palin. You're just dumb, I suppose.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 03, 2009, 03:48:03 PM

Because I don't want our convention to continue being interrupted by the least intelligent poster on this forum? Right. That makes me immature. You're the one that always has to bring me up when it doesn't even involve you or me.

No, what makes you immature is that you throw these hissy fits when people call you out for hypocrisy and dishonesty.

Because those claims are untrue and unwarranted. You're a jealous little troll.

Jealous of what?? LOL. I just want to know who died and made you chairman of the RPP.

     Nobody. Which makes everyone freaking out over this ridiculous, since it's not as if he has authority to count or discount votes. If I randomly declared that every ballot a Democrat cast in CA statewide elections was automatically invalid, would people actually think that anything would happen?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on October 03, 2009, 03:48:50 PM
Seriously though, he was in the party when he voted, and when the voting closed. The fact that he is in the JCP now isn't much of an excuse, because he was in the RPP when voting began and ended.

He is a joke poster who switches parties for no reason.

No reason?

I have reasons.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on October 03, 2009, 03:50:22 PM
Seriously though, he was in the party when he voted, and when the voting closed. The fact that he is in the JCP now isn't much of an excuse, because he was in the RPP when voting began and ended.

Stop being ignorant. At the very least he was on chairman review because a motion was pressed. He is a joke poster who switches parties for no reason. Why did you make that stupid law if you aren't going to use it when it is needed?
Getting angry at anyone who disagrees with you won't get you far in life.
Does being on chairman review mean your votes can't count? And did I ever say I wouldn't support a motion to remove Sewer Socialist from the party? It doesn't even matter, since he isn't in our party anymore. Legally speaking, though, I don't see why his vote can't count.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 03, 2009, 03:50:46 PM
Seriously though, he was in the party when he voted, and when the voting closed. The fact that he is in the JCP now isn't much of an excuse, because he was in the RPP when voting began and ended.

He is a joke poster who switches parties for no reason.

No reason?

I have reasons.

If you restart the sh**t is getting on my nerves party, make sure to make Rowan chairman.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 03, 2009, 03:50:58 PM
Someone open the damn convention


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 03, 2009, 03:51:50 PM
Seriously though, he was in the party when he voted, and when the voting closed. The fact that he is in the JCP now isn't much of an excuse, because he was in the RPP when voting began and ended.

Stop being ignorant. At the very least he was on chairman review because a motion was pressed. He is a joke poster who switches parties for no reason. Why did you make that stupid law if you aren't going to use it when it is needed?
Getting angry at anyone who disagrees with you won't get you far in life.
Does being on chairman review mean your votes can't count? And did I ever say I wouldn't support a motion to remove Sewer Socialist from the party? It doesn't even matter, since he isn't in our party anymore. Legally speaking, though, I don't see why his vote can't count.

Because he never should have been here in the first place. If we wanted people like him in our party, why do you make that stupid law? Please explain.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 03, 2009, 03:54:34 PM

     Okay. I think it'll be in Indianapolis since Sewer's vote should be counted & also Smid & dead0man voted too late.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 03, 2009, 03:55:15 PM

     Okay. I think it'll be in Indianapolis since Sewer's vote should be counted & also Smid & dead0man voted too late.
What?  That's sets a horrible precedent if we count Sewer's vote.  I ask that the convention then be halted until Duke can rule on the matter


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on October 03, 2009, 03:56:00 PM
Does which city we host our convention really matter enough to delay the convention, possibly until tomorrow?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on October 03, 2009, 03:56:32 PM

     Okay. I think it'll be in Indianapolis since Sewer's vote should be counted & also Smid & dead0man voted too late.
What?  That's sets a horrible precedent if we count Sewer's vote.  I ask that the convention then be halted until Duke can rule on the matter

What horrible precedent? That members of the party can vote?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 03, 2009, 03:57:15 PM
Second the motion to hold for Duke's ruling.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 03, 2009, 03:58:58 PM
What horrible precedent? That members of the party can vote?
No, the idea that vote stacking is allowed.  My CRs had a similar problem last year, some kid brought all his friends to one meeting and vote so he would get a spot on the board.  This lead to adaption of a new constitution that included a clause saying you needed to attend 50% of meetings to vote.  The RPP needs something similar like that you must have been in the party for a certain amount of time, otherwise people could just join our party to vote on internal matters and then leave.  There are too many possible issues that could come at this convention to allow stunts like this to be precedent.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on October 03, 2009, 03:59:36 PM

     Okay. I think it'll be in Indianapolis since Sewer's vote should be counted & also Smid & dead0man voted too late.
What?  That's sets a horrible precedent if we count Sewer's vote.  I ask that the convention then be halted until Duke can rule on the matter

What horrible precedent? That members of the party can vote?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 03, 2009, 03:59:52 PM
     How about we just start the convention now & say it's in a city "to be determined"? We're already starting late as it is.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on October 03, 2009, 04:00:51 PM
    How about we just start the convention now & say it's in a city "to be determined"? We're already starting late as it is.

I second the motion.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on October 03, 2009, 04:01:03 PM
    How about we just start the convention now & say it's in a city "to be determined"? We're already starting late as it is.
Yeah, that's what I was thinking


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 03, 2009, 04:01:16 PM
Rowan and Sewer... Big Troll supporting Small Troll that is actually funny


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on October 03, 2009, 04:02:05 PM
What horrible precedent? That members of the party can vote?
No, the idea that vote stacking is allowed.  My CRs had a similar problem last year, some kid brought all his friends to one meeting and vote so he would get a spot on the board.  This lead to adaption of a new constitution that included a clause saying you needed to attend 50% of meetings to vote.  The RPP needs something similar like that you must have been in the party for a certain amount of time, otherwise people could just join our party to vote on internal matters and then leave.  There are too many possible issues that could come at this convention to allow stunts like this to be precedent.
That's a good idea for a party bylaw. Maybe, you have to be a member of the party for two weeks to participate in party votes?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on October 03, 2009, 04:03:03 PM
I will motion for a "No Sewer or Rowan Clause" banning infamous trolls.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on October 03, 2009, 04:03:40 PM
Rowan and Sewer... Big Troll supporting Small Troll that is actually funny

:^D


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on October 03, 2009, 04:11:59 PM
I will motion for a "No Sewer or Rowan Clause" banning infamous trolls.

Reminds me of the legendarily successful AUB.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on October 03, 2009, 04:13:03 PM
I will motion for a "No Hamilton Clause" banning infamous trolls.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on October 03, 2009, 07:02:10 PM
I would like private forum access please.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: afleitch on October 03, 2009, 07:04:09 PM
()

There you go. I was saving that torch for...something that did not quite come to pass.


Title: Re: Liberal Conservative Party
Post by: Psychic Octopus on October 03, 2009, 07:05:20 PM
()

There you go. I was saving that torch for...something that did not quite come to pass.

I like it; Both of the ones we made were good.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on October 03, 2009, 07:15:11 PM
After reading through this, I find actions surronding the counting of the votes despicable and criminal. Rule are rules and must be applied equally and fairly to everyone.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 08, 2009, 07:35:31 PM
BUMP

The party needs to take a more active role, regional senate seats are almost in as much danger as they were in August 2008.  With smaller numbers we defeated this absurd proposal but we need to organize the way we were back then. 


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on November 09, 2009, 11:21:38 AM
Any members of this party who believe in small government should head to the New Register Thread and join the Atlasia Reform Coalition.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 09, 2009, 01:55:14 PM
I think many sectors of the PC believe in smaller government, but the question that arises is how will your party, or our party for that matter, accomplish this in the Atlasia environment? As I have said, I am for smaller government, more civil liberties, lower taxes, and lower government spending, but I am a realist first and foremost in knowing that changes like that, economically speaking, are pretty unrealistic given the makeup of Atlasia at its present. I look favorably to any party that espouses those said principles, but realize it may not be a realistic goal given the disproportionate number of left leaners in this "nation."

Unlike others, I will wish you luck in your endeavors.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on November 09, 2009, 01:59:49 PM
Well, for starters, our party will be more accessible for most Atlasians, being less ideologically-driven. You have to give props to a party that can house me, Einzige, and Libertas all at once.

We don't hate the Progressive Conservatives. We just hate their lack of adherence to small government principles. The party might not be able to win the Midwest Senate seat or the Mideast Senate seat without big government supporters like Tmth and MJ, but why do they still support the same populist ideologues in the Southeast and At-Large. Einzige is right when he says that the libertarian wing is stifled. Much like the Republican Party, you abandon the base in the swing states/regions but then you use the same strategies for the safe seats, essentially abandoning much of the base altogether.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 09, 2009, 02:13:06 PM
Our base since our founding has always been to preserve the rights of regions and ensure that certain rights were not infringed upon by the federal government, with an end goal of transferring certain powers from the federal government to the regions. In fact, ideologies in Atlasia, back when I joined and the RPP was founded, was basically regionalists versus anti-regionalists, rather than the left and right we see today. The PC has had libertarians, liberals, populists and conservatives elected to office in our existence, and there is nothing to suggest we are not going to do that again in the future. Our current makeup is not what it was, but we are not a purist, single ideology party, which is funny considering you and Eizign claim we are too purist. But we haven't abandoned our base as long as we fight for regional rights. That is our base.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on November 09, 2009, 02:14:27 PM
Nationalistic populism defies regional governments their own self-governance.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 09, 2009, 02:16:29 PM
What exactly, in your mind, are our current elected officials doing to defy regional governments their own self-governance (granted we did have some support the stimulus)? And what makes your party different than ours in that respect? Just curious.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on November 09, 2009, 02:17:44 PM
What exactly, in your mind, are our current elected officials doing to defy regional governments their own self-governance (granted we did have some support the stimulus)? And what makes your party different than ours in that respect? Just curious.

My party has not yet clearly defined itself, but as stated, we support small government and personal freedoms. Some in the PCP do,a s well, but not the majority. I have class right now and will elaborate further upon my return.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 09, 2009, 02:22:59 PM
Looking forward to it. "Small government and personal freedoms" is such a vague term that it can mean anything. A party our size cannot have everyone believing in the exact same ideology, it would be too difficult, but I would argue we do have more social liberals/moderates than social conservatives, as well as nearly universal right of center economic conservatives (except tmth), but I realize your and Eigzine's definitions differ from the rest of us.

There are differences in your party though. If I recall, you are against free-trade, and Eigzine is pro-free trade! Just food for thought.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on November 09, 2009, 02:31:37 PM
im pro-free trade when it is mutual. im against free trade with places that manipulate their home markets like china and japan


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on November 09, 2009, 02:35:01 PM
Like I said, the ARC is not "Hamilton Party".


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 09, 2009, 02:44:15 PM
But you are the figurehead of the party, just as every other party has figureheads (except the NLF). And you made the claim no other party adheres to principles. Thus, I was just defending this party against those claims, pointing out that there are differences in the "ARC" as well. No party can have a single ideology or litmus test. Each goes through phases. It's unrealistic to expect any of us to elect ONLY libertarians or ONLY people to adhere to one principle, especially if their ideology is far out of the mainstream (not saying yours is, but I don't know what the ideology is of the ARC yet).


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on November 09, 2009, 02:47:35 PM
let me answer that when i get out of class


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Brandon H on November 09, 2009, 02:57:56 PM
We have a variety of ideologies in our party. Each of us could find things that we disagree with each other on. But for the most part none of us will run against another party member (much like the members of any other party are). And no matter how much anyone favors small government, you won't get it in Atlasia.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on November 09, 2009, 03:02:45 PM
It doesnt mean we should abandon attempts to represent those principles.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 09, 2009, 03:07:10 PM
I'm curious to see what you have to say, because you have called us the "party of no" in the past when we opposed these spending measures. I'd like to hear what you would've done differently so that your party is not the "party of no" either.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Scam of God on November 09, 2009, 03:09:01 PM
I'm curious to see what you have to say, because you have called us the "party of no" in the past when we opposed these spending measures. I'd like to hear what you would've done differently so that your party is not the "party of no" either.

Look at my platform for an example of progressive libertarianism.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on November 10, 2009, 08:00:37 PM
After doing some thinking, I have decided to resign from my post as Vice-Chairman of the Progressive Conservative Party.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on November 10, 2009, 08:01:43 PM
After doing some thinking, I have decided to resign from my post as Vice-Chairman of the Progressive Conservative Party.

The party has lost its way. You made the right choice, I'm sure.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 14, 2009, 08:09:46 PM
I am here to announce that I am stepping down as Chairman of the Progressive Conservative Party. It has been a wild ride over the past few months. I've witnessed many, many events that have caused me to rethink what the purpose of this party is, and what the purpose of Atlasia is as a whole. First off, I would like to thank my supporters, who have helped me tremendously through the difficult times since I took over in August. You are what makes Atlasia great.

But, I fear the worst is yet to come. Recently, the attacks have become more and more personal. I've seen members physical attributes under attack. I've been told I was "the biggest retard ever" and one person went as far as to say they wish I "would just go die." When it becomes that personal, that inappropriate, it is time to rethink why one is in the game. It should not be that way. This is why people do not want to participate in it. Perhaps I wasn't the best chairman in the world. Maybe it was because I wasn't able to make 1000 posts a month, monitor the "who's online" area to see who could be my best recruit, or respond to PMs within the hour. I don't know. I did what I could do, while trying to decipher the zombies, backroom deals, and strategic recruiting that occurred behind my back.

Before I go, I just want to call to an end to all this crap, or else Atlasia is doomed to return to the days in 2006, where no one wanted to be involved with it. We need to end these personal attacks and return to attacks on ideas. We need to return to an age where friendships meant something, not where each person is subject to being thrown under the bus for political gain. These are the days we need to return to, not the current climate we currently are seeing. It's disgusting. I'm sorry I've learned some of the things  I know about these people.

I hope that the right leaning people are able to unify in order to advance our principles of a less intrusive federal government and lower spending, because our undoing is our fault alone, and not that of the left. But right now, I fear, we will be spending a good amount of time in the wilderness before we ever have the chance to compete nationally again. That's just our climate.

To my successor in the PCP, good luck. Running this party is not easy, with so many egos in the room, but I hope that you are successful in your endeavors, because this party has never been about me, it has been about the cause. After all, the better this party does, the better off the voice of all right leaning individuals is. Thanks and good luck to all.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Psychic Octopus on November 14, 2009, 08:23:02 PM
Even though I left during the final moments of your tenure, my decision was not because of you. I've always maintained that you were a fine chairman, but that there were certain problems that you could not fix, nor anyone could fix, so you were blamed for it. The RPP/PCP is heading towards a new phase, and that is why I left. I cannot take the insufferable, childish infighting that has been going on since August, when I joined. I look at the other parties, and they are not in a state of constant civil war. I mean sure, they have their differences, but it never escalates to the rudeness and unbelieveable hatred some members display toward other each other. I've been accused of being a "Hamilton crony", while some members have been insulted even further.

That is why I have become an Independent, and I choose to remain so until I find a party that fits me. Unless the RPP cleans itself up internally, I will not be returning.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 14, 2009, 10:03:17 PM
Even though I left during the final moments of your tenure, my decision was not because of you. I've always maintained that you were a fine chairman, but that there were certain problems that you could not fix, nor anyone could fix, so you were blamed for it. The RPP/PCP is heading towards a new phase, and that is why I left. I cannot take the insufferable, childish infighting that has been going on since August, when I joined. I look at the other parties, and they are not in a state of constant civil war. I mean sure, they have their differences, but it never escalates to the rudeness and unbelieveable hatred some members display toward other each other. I've been accused of being a "Hamilton crony", while some members have been insulted even further.

That is why I have become an Independent, and I choose to remain so until I find a party that fits me. Unless the RPP cleans itself up internally, I will not be returning.

What happened to you is remarkably similar to what happened to Vepres back a few months. The fact the we let it happen again just makes it all the more stupid. A lesson for the future that this time will be paid attention to.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Devilman88 on November 14, 2009, 10:09:37 PM
Shouldn't we go ahead and vote in a new Chair?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 14, 2009, 10:17:34 PM
Shouldn't we go ahead and vote in a new Chair?

Yea, we should at least start the vote.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on November 14, 2009, 10:20:14 PM
     I guess this makes me acting chairman, so we will need to hold elections on a new permanent chairman. Anyone who wants to run will have 48 hours to declare.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 14, 2009, 10:23:08 PM
I am running for the Chairmenship of the Progressive Conservative Party.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: President Mitt on November 14, 2009, 10:25:37 PM
I am here to announce that I am stepping down as Chairman of the Progressive Conservative Party. It has been a wild ride over the past few months. I've witnessed many, many events that have caused me to rethink what the purpose of this party is, and what the purpose of Atlasia is as a whole. First off, I would like to thank my supporters, who have helped me tremendously through the difficult times since I took over in August. You are what makes Atlasia great.

But, I fear the worst is yet to come. Recently, the attacks have become more and more personal. I've seen members physical attributes under attack. I've been told I was "the biggest retard ever" and one person went as far as to say they wish I "would just go die." When it becomes that personal, that inappropriate, it is time to rethink why one is in the game. It should not be that way. This is why people do not want to participate in it. Perhaps I wasn't the best chairman in the world. Maybe it was because I wasn't able to make 1000 posts a month, monitor the "who's online" area to see who could be my best recruit, or respond to PMs within the hour. I don't know. I did what I could do, while trying to decipher the zombies, backroom deals, and strategic recruiting that occurred behind my back.

Before I go, I just want to call to an end to all this crap, or else Atlasia is doomed to return to the days in 2006, where no one wanted to be involved with it. We need to end these personal attacks and return to attacks on ideas. We need to return to an age where friendships meant something, not where each person is subject to being thrown under the bus for political gain. These are the days we need to return to, not the current climate we currently are seeing. It's disgusting. I'm sorry I've learned some of the things  I know about these people.

I hope that the right leaning people are able to unify in order to advance our principles of a less intrusive federal government and lower spending, because our undoing is our fault alone, and not that of the left. But right now, I fear, we will be spending a good amount of time in the wilderness before we ever have the chance to compete nationally again. That's just our climate.

To my successor in the PCP, good luck. Running this party is not easy, with so many egos in the room, but I hope that you are successful in your endeavors, because this party has never been about me, it has been about the cause. After all, the better this party does, the better off the voice of all right leaning individuals is. Thanks and good luck to all.

You were not the reason of my defection either. You were a good Chairman, if anybody else had been in charge, the defections would have been 10X worse than already. My new Party, the Democratic Alliance is almost never at each other's throats. The RPP was created to unite the Right (neat rhyme huh?) While what it only succeeded in was dividing the Right in the face of a much more united Left. And when Atlasia is almost 60% leftist, the Right cannot afford to splinter in the face of a united foe. I may very well return to the PCP one day, and the first step to regaining the defectors of this Party is to elect an Chairperson that can bring the right together.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on November 14, 2009, 10:39:16 PM
I agree, it is time to end this cut-throat environment. In the past few weeks I've resigned myself to simply watching things unfold. I've gotten tired of holding grudges, instead focusing on my job as GM and on internal party matters. When this game becomes centered around personal hatreds, it becomes less of a political simulation and more of a "tea party" rally.

I'm afraid your resignation, Duke, will not have the desired impact on the game. I hope I'm wrong.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 15, 2009, 03:08:56 AM
I wish it would, but I fear the negative aspects of the game will only get worse before those who are sane come up and say "enough is enough." There are certain elements in the game that play it to an unfair advantage, using dishonestly and other means to gain power, or other questionable methods to build up voter rolls. These were aspects of the game of which I had no control over, and I could not, in good conscious, continue to lead the party while receiving threats against my life and intelligence. All in all, I felt like I did the best I could given the situation at hand when I took over as chairman. I attempted to please those and create a happy medium between the factions, but it was never enough, and the attacks got more and more vile, the backroom secrecy become worse and worse, and it just got to the point where I could no longer handle it. The zombie recruiting and strategic registration aspects have been purged to another party, which I will not name, but whether that practice will continue or not remains to be seen. All of those aforementioned things were, again, things I could not stop if the party engaging in them was unwilling to listen.

We'll see how the next chairman does, but I fear it will only get worse in Atlasia before it gets better. I hope the PCP shapes up.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 15, 2009, 11:08:07 AM
The RPP had two major roadblocks that were stopping us for the last few months: Tmth and Hamilton

With both of them gone things should be much easier to run.  Seriously, ever problem stemmed from these two trying to seize power anyone they could.  At this time, for reasons I do not wish to disclose but has been discussed on the private forum (which is why I am sure Hamilton and Xahar do not have access or they would have disclosed them) I cannot return to my post as chair.  With that, I endorse someone who I know will restore the order that existed before my depature as chair (which is not Duke's fault it was more of prediction of that if you caved to Tmth and Hamilton a little they'd demand a lot), my former running mate, NCYankee


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Franzl on November 15, 2009, 12:29:02 PM
The RPP reminds me of the GOP.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 15, 2009, 04:45:06 PM
In the interest of all that is holy, I would like to get the chairman candidates nominated and voted on pretty quickly. We don't need to be in a state of chaos either way. Thus far, only NC Yankee has declared for the position.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: bgwah on November 15, 2009, 04:48:16 PM
Do you think you guys could change your name back? It seems like all of the name-change lovers have left the party and PCP is an awful name.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: k-onmmunist on November 15, 2009, 04:50:13 PM
PCP is a better name.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 15, 2009, 04:51:33 PM
Do you think you guys could change your name back? It seems like all of the name-change lovers have left the party and PCP is an awful name.

We can motion to repeal the name change once we decide on a chairman if that it agreed upon among enough members, which, I believe it will be.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 15, 2009, 04:53:24 PM
Do you think you guys could change your name back? It seems like all of the name-change lovers have left the party and PCP is an awful name.

Well it does seem so. But there still maybe some out there that supported it and its not a big concern. Also we are concerned that it would make us look kind of stupid to change it back down. If you could squash the potential criticism, I would gladly change it back.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on November 15, 2009, 05:51:08 PM
     Problem is, changing our name back would require a quorum once again. I don't know how many people we have currently, but getting a majority to come out to vote might be impossible.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 15, 2009, 06:16:17 PM
     Problem is, changing our name back would require a quorum once again. I don't know how many people we have currently, but getting a majority to come out to vote might be impossible.

There is more then one way to skin a cat, you know.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on November 15, 2009, 07:09:58 PM
     Problem is, changing our name back would require a quorum once again. I don't know how many people we have currently, but getting a majority to come out to vote might be impossible.

There is more then one way to skin a cat, you know.

As in, you could all just re-register as RPP and resurrect the party.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 15, 2009, 07:30:04 PM
     Problem is, changing our name back would require a quorum once again. I don't know how many people we have currently, but getting a majority to come out to vote might be impossible.

There is more then one way to skin a cat, you know.

As in, you could all just re-register as RPP and resurrect the party.

There is something else I can do, as well.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 17, 2009, 05:11:00 PM
I am sure the declaration period has ended by now.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on November 17, 2009, 05:12:48 PM
I am sure the declaration period has ended by now.

When did it start?

I declare.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 17, 2009, 05:18:24 PM

Saturday at 10:50 or something and it lasted for 48 hours. Ya have ta roon a write in compin, ladd.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on November 17, 2009, 08:36:29 PM
     The declaration period is over. Voting will be open for 72 hours. Here is the ballot:

[  ] North Carolina Yankee
[  ] Write-In:_____________


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 17, 2009, 09:18:06 PM
NCYankee


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 17, 2009, 09:25:13 PM
[ 1 ] North Carolina Yankee
[  ] Write-In:_____________


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: CatoMinor on November 17, 2009, 09:25:36 PM
NCYankee


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 17, 2009, 09:25:57 PM
NC Yankee


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MasterJedi on November 17, 2009, 09:27:05 PM
NC Yankee


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on November 17, 2009, 09:32:24 PM
     NC Yankee


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Brandon H on November 17, 2009, 09:53:39 PM
NC Yankee


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on November 17, 2009, 09:55:04 PM
RowanBrandon

That's right. I went all mavericky up in here biatches.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 17, 2009, 10:09:19 PM
RowanBrandon

That's right. I went all mavericky up in here biatches.

You have always been a maverick in this party of sorts. I don't mind.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Devilman88 on November 18, 2009, 12:56:20 AM
I guess NC Yank


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: big bad fab on November 18, 2009, 05:57:56 AM
NC Yankee


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 18, 2009, 04:58:12 PM
I don't know if I'm allowed to post here since I never joined any RPP (I'm a member of the PCP) but if I do get a vote, I vote for North Carolina Yankee


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 18, 2009, 05:08:05 PM
I don't know if I'm allowed to post here since I never joined any RPP (I'm a member of the PCP) but if I do get a vote, I vote for North Carolina Yankee

You get to vote. They are one in the same.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 18, 2009, 08:27:24 PM
Also, I made us some "logos" as seen in my sig.



Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 18, 2009, 08:48:30 PM
Also, I made us some "logos" as seen in my sig.



I like the idea of a torch. But as I have said the name Progressive Conservative Party will soon be gone. We only have it because it was foisted upon us as part of one of Hamilton's foolish schemes. We need to move away from Hamilton and that includes getting rid of his name for the party.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Countess Anya of the North Parish on November 18, 2009, 08:52:55 PM
I think i should let you guys know why you have gotton some weird IP's on your secret forum.

Pit let me access it for a year. And He did the same with others. just thought i should get that off my chest. And he isn't running so it is all good.

bye.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 18, 2009, 09:03:42 PM
I think i should let you guys know why you have gotton some weird IP's on your secret forum.

Pit let me access it for a year. And He did the same with others. just thought i should get that off my chest. And he isn't running so it is all good.

bye.

What? ???


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on November 18, 2009, 11:10:37 PM
Why you even have a secret forum is still beyond me.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 19, 2009, 12:48:36 AM
I think i should let you guys know why you have gotton some weird IP's on your secret forum.

Pit let me access it for a year. And He did the same with others. just thought i should get that off my chest. And he isn't running so it is all good.

bye.

Isn't this common knowledge?

Why you even have a secret forum is still beyond me.

Yeah, security is beyond horrible.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 19, 2009, 01:27:30 AM
Also, I made us some "logos" as seen in my sig.



I like the idea of a torch. But as I have said the name Progressive Conservative Party will soon be gone. We only have it because it was foisted upon us as part of one of Hamilton's foolish schemes. We need to move away from Hamilton and that includes getting rid of his name for the party.

Why not drop Progressive. Are we not Conservative?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 19, 2009, 07:17:08 AM
Also, I made us some "logos" as seen in my sig.



I like the idea of a torch. But as I have said the name Progressive Conservative Party will soon be gone. We only have it because it was foisted upon us as part of one of Hamilton's foolish schemes. We need to move away from Hamilton and that includes getting rid of his name for the party.

Why not drop Progressive. Are we not Conservative?

There are many options that will be on the table, if you want to propose that one you are more then welcome.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 19, 2009, 01:11:03 PM
Where is this secret forum that non members have access to but I dont?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 19, 2009, 03:55:26 PM
Where is this secret forum that non members have access to but I dont?

http://brandonhendricks.com/atlasforumprivate/


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 19, 2009, 06:58:23 PM
Just waiting for approval then I can go about stopping them from making the biggest mistake of their lives.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 19, 2009, 07:15:39 PM
Just waiting for approval then I can go about stopping them from making the biggest mistake of their lives.

What?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 19, 2009, 08:24:13 PM
Just waiting for approval then I can go about stopping them from making the biggest mistake of their lives.

What?
"Regional Protection Party" Ick. name makes me want to vomit. I'm going to be trying my darndest to ensure something better is picked.

Also, brown is the colour of poo


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 19, 2009, 09:10:22 PM
Just waiting for approval then I can go about stopping them from making the biggest mistake of their lives.

What?
"Regional Protection Party" Ick. name makes me want to vomit. I'm going to be trying my darndest to ensure something better is picked.

Also, brown is the colour of poo

It isn't Brown, the color is darkkhaki.

You see, I have seen to many people claim regions are not important or use the new name as an excuse to oppose Regional SEante seats or the Regions.

We will be returning to the RPP at least temporarily cause I intend to naulify the previous Name change vote for not meeting the terms expressed in the PArty Empowerment Act.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 19, 2009, 09:16:08 PM
How does naulificaiton work?

And why would the SoFA approve?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on November 19, 2009, 09:17:37 PM

Don't make fun of our chairman just because he is retarded and can't spell.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 19, 2009, 09:21:54 PM

I will simply declare that the vote didn't pass for failing to reach a quorum as per the Party Empowerment act. There is no bylaw governing a sitaution involving deleted ballots. PiT simply created a precedent to appease Hamilton and Duke went along cause he didn't want to party to collapse.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on November 19, 2009, 09:23:16 PM

I will simply declare that the vote didn't pass for failing to reach a quorum as per the Party Empowerment act. There is no bylaw governing a sitaution involving deleted ballots. PiT simply created a precedent to appease Hamilton and Duke went along cause he didn't want to party to collapse.

You're an idiot. He was clearly mocking you for making up a word.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 19, 2009, 09:24:21 PM
How does naulificaiton work?

And why would the SoFA approve?

Because its up to the party's to make rules about governing a vote and when votes are to be counted.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 19, 2009, 09:25:22 PM
Ah, I see your point.

Wait, you just contradicted yourself.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 19, 2009, 09:25:31 PM

I will simply declare that the vote didn't pass for failing to reach a quorum as per the Party Empowerment act. There is no bylaw governing a sitaution involving deleted ballots. PiT simply created a precedent to appease Hamilton and Duke went along cause he didn't want to party to collapse.

You're an idiot. He was clearly mocking you for making up a word.

Then why would he ask about the SoFA approving?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on November 19, 2009, 09:27:57 PM

I will simply declare that the vote didn't pass for failing to reach a quorum as per the Party Empowerment act. There is no bylaw governing a sitaution involving deleted ballots. PiT simply created a precedent to appease Hamilton and Duke went along cause he didn't want to party to collapse.

You're an idiot. He was clearly mocking you for making up a word.

Then why would he ask about the SoFA approving?

Then he is clearly an idiot too. Naulification isn't a word. You're looking for nullification.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on November 19, 2009, 09:30:29 PM
John C. Calhoun was an advocate of naulificaiton.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 19, 2009, 09:30:40 PM

I will simply declare that the vote didn't pass for failing to reach a quorum as per the Party Empowerment act. There is no bylaw governing a sitaution involving deleted ballots. PiT simply created a precedent to appease Hamilton and Duke went along cause he didn't want to party to collapse.

You're an idiot. He was clearly mocking you for making up a word.

Then why would he ask about the SoFA approving?

Then he is clearly an idiot too. Naulification isn't a word. You're looking for nullification.

ITs an internet forum, not a term paper, grammar nazi.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 19, 2009, 10:13:54 PM
Don't make fun of our chairman just because he is retarded

Party unity at it's finest


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 19, 2009, 10:29:22 PM
Don't make fun of our chairman just because he is retarded

Party unity at it's finest

Calling me retarded was not a good idea. I am insane, not retarded. :)



Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 20, 2009, 08:23:12 AM
Though it really is just a formality as this party is completely under my supreme command, we have a leadership election going on, so please VOTE!!!!!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party( WE NEED RPPers TO VOTE)
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 20, 2009, 04:33:14 PM
You already voted Brandon,

NC Yankee 8:  DWTL, NC Yankee, JBrase, Duke, Jedi, Brandon H, Devilman- questionable vote left party, BBF, Teddy


Rowan Brandon 1 : RowanBrandon


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: RIP Robert H Bork on November 20, 2009, 05:14:51 PM
     The declaration period is over. Voting will be open for 72 hours. Here is the ballot:

[X] North Carolina Yankee
[  ] Write-In:_____________


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on November 20, 2009, 11:50:49 PM
     Voting is now over. North Carolina Yankee is the new Chairman of the RPP/PCP.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Psychic Octopus on November 20, 2009, 11:52:42 PM
Congratulations, you have a tough job ahead. Are you up for it? :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 21, 2009, 12:53:18 AM
Sweet.

We've never had a "Conservative Party" and I will be working with our new leader to ensure that we have one now.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 21, 2009, 01:05:49 AM
Also. I made a logo for the Conservative Party of Atlasia:

()


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 21, 2009, 12:01:42 PM
Congratulations, you have a tough job ahead. Are you up for it? :)

Yes, I think I am.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 21, 2009, 07:53:11 PM
YOU'RE ALL MINE NOW, CONSERVATIVES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ;D


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Psychic Octopus on November 21, 2009, 07:54:14 PM
YOU'RE ALL MINE NOW, CONSERVATIVES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ;D

So Liberal Conservatives are not yours?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on November 21, 2009, 08:00:20 PM
Good decision.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on November 21, 2009, 08:00:43 PM
Congrats, Yankee


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: afleitch on November 21, 2009, 08:02:40 PM
Congrats :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 21, 2009, 08:05:41 PM
YOU'RE ALL MINE NOW, CONSERVATIVES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ;D

So Liberal Conservatives are not yours?

Especially Liberal Conservatives. They all belong to me now. :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 21, 2009, 08:06:29 PM
I await orders my leader


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Psychic Octopus on November 21, 2009, 08:07:44 PM
I await diplomatic orders, as a liason, my leader.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 21, 2009, 08:12:16 PM
To let you know what you just got, I am providing you with this post. This is the post that Hamilton neglected to leak you from the "Since its only a matter of time, anyway" topic on the privat Forum.

Here's what you are going to get.

1. DWTL/Rowan, As soon I become chairmen I am officially ordering you to halt all attacts on the following people: Vepres, Tmth, NiK, HappyWarrior, Afleitch, The DA in general, and anyone else, that I might add later to the list.

2. Hamilton, and anyone who attacks us first is fair game, attack them at will.

3. The penalty for violating this will be.

A. I will get very, very angry with you and I will send you a latter expressing how angry I am. :P

B. You risk losing the party endorsement for any future offices.

C. You risk being removed from the party by force if necessary.

Just in case you are confused this is not the appeasement strategy. Its the " kick ass in your own party, enforce the rules and play hardball with the other parties but not obliging to let them know our next move" strategy.

This only a taste of what Yankee's Empire..um Party will look like.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Psychic Octopus on November 21, 2009, 08:44:25 PM
I'm back, but I'm still Ambassador to the ARC. I just switched roles. :D


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 21, 2009, 08:48:33 PM
I'm back, but I'm still Ambassador to the ARC. I just switched roles. :D

Gunning for SoEA someday, watch out HappyWarrior. ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party(Name Change Vote)
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 21, 2009, 09:04:55 PM
Should the party name be restored to the Regional Protection Party? This vote will last a week. All members registered at the commencement of this election are eligible to vote.

Please Vote AYE or NAY.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Psychic Octopus on November 21, 2009, 09:09:35 PM
AYE


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 21, 2009, 09:10:27 PM
Aye


Only 17 more votes to go. :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Mint on November 21, 2009, 09:10:41 PM
Honestly why did you guys ever think naming yourself after a drug would turn out well? :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 21, 2009, 09:12:05 PM
Honestly why did you guys ever think naming yourself after a drug would turn out well? :P


How is Alexander's Rubbing Circus going? As a matter of a fact Hamilton is the one who foisted this name on us.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Psychic Octopus on November 21, 2009, 09:14:49 PM
Honestly why did you guys ever think naming yourself after a drug would turn out well? :P


How is Alexander's Rubbing Circus going? As a matter of a fact Hamilton is the one who foisted this name on us.

Cool down, Yank. We need to foster good relations between the ARC and RPP. :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on November 21, 2009, 09:24:11 PM
     Aye.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 21, 2009, 09:27:18 PM
Honestly why did you guys ever think naming yourself after a drug would turn out well? :P


How is Alexander's Rubbing Circus going? As a matter of a fact Hamilton is the one who foisted this name on us.

Cool down, Yank. We need to foster good relations between the ARC and RPP. :)

I was joking.

But for the moment I can't see a working relationship between rhe RPP and the ARC which is what I would like there to be and you know that NiK, I truly want that, but three things have to be done first.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on November 21, 2009, 09:32:00 PM
Aye


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 21, 2009, 09:34:57 PM
Aye, restore the founder's intent if we want to show we are ready to return to our old prominence


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Psychic Octopus on November 21, 2009, 09:36:46 PM
Honestly why did you guys ever think naming yourself after a drug would turn out well? :P


How is Alexander's Rubbing Circus going? As a matter of a fact Hamilton is the one who foisted this name on us.

Cool down, Yank. We need to foster good relations between the ARC and RPP. :)

I was joking.

But for the moment I can't see a working relationship between rhe RPP and the ARC which is what I would like there to be and you know that NiK, I truly want that, but three things have to be done first.

Ok, :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party(Name Change Vote)
Post by: RIP Robert H Bork on November 21, 2009, 09:38:46 PM
Should the party name be restored to the Regional Protection Party? This vote will last a week. All members registered at the commencement of this election are eligible to vote.

Please Vote AYE or NAY.

Aye.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: CatoMinor on November 21, 2009, 09:49:52 PM
Aye.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Daniel Adams on November 21, 2009, 10:00:59 PM
Aye


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Psychic Octopus on November 21, 2009, 10:03:57 PM
Seven so far.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 21, 2009, 10:07:19 PM

12 more to go.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 21, 2009, 10:59:00 PM

You use the royal plural?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 21, 2009, 11:01:28 PM
Aye


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 21, 2009, 11:03:46 PM
Nay

We need a better name than either of the two options presented (RPP VS PCP)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 21, 2009, 11:04:05 PM

What?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Hash on November 21, 2009, 11:21:12 PM

Do you know a bit about English grammar?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on November 21, 2009, 11:45:55 PM

He wants to naulify it.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Brandon H on November 21, 2009, 11:57:41 PM
Aye


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Purple State on November 22, 2009, 12:27:04 AM

Wouldn't the royal plural have been, "As soon [as] we become chairman"? His sentence is just poor grammar. :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: dead0man on November 22, 2009, 10:14:38 AM
Aye


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on November 22, 2009, 12:04:20 PM
Back to RPP ?

Why don't you just call yourself "Conservative Party" or something like that ?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 22, 2009, 12:57:02 PM
Back to RPP ?

Why don't you just call yourself "Conservative Party" or something like that ?

MAybe in the future. For now though I think that this is needed. That is certainly an option that will be on table when the time.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 22, 2009, 02:48:14 PM

Perhaps he was crowned in mid-sentence.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 22, 2009, 02:55:22 PM

Perhaps, I don't give a sh**t about sentence structure on a damn message board, dumbasses.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 22, 2009, 04:04:32 PM
We need 8 more votes


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: big bad fab on November 22, 2009, 06:21:09 PM
Blank vote.

So that it counts for the quorum,
but so that I can say I agree on the need to scratch a now failed name (PCP) but I don't agree to go back to RPP, as it has also failed (even if fro different reasons).

Of course, if the blank vote isn't considered as a real and complete vote, just let it me know, I'll cast another vote (no rule against that !).


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 22, 2009, 06:34:57 PM
Blank vote.

So that it counts for the quorum,
but so that I can say I agree on the need to scratch a now failed name (PCP) but I don't agree to go back to RPP, as it has also failed (even if fro different reasons).

Of course, if the blank vote isn't considered as a real and complete vote, just let it me know, I'll cast another vote (no rule against that !).

Here here!

I even say that even Regional Rights Party would be better, but again, I think Conservative is the best option.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: big bad fab on November 22, 2009, 06:45:04 PM
Blank vote.

So that it counts for the quorum,
but so that I can say I agree on the need to scratch a now failed name (PCP) but I don't agree to go back to RPP, as it has also failed (even if fro different reasons).

Of course, if the blank vote isn't considered as a real and complete vote, just let it me know, I'll cast another vote (no rule against that !).

Here here!

I even say that even Regional Rights Party would be better, but again, I think Conservative is the best option.

I know, your proposal is simple and clear. Adn I thank you to be a force for change in the name.

But, for the moment, this is more a procedural vote: to erase the latest name change.
Let's our chairman proceed. He thinks it's better first to erase PCP and then to relaunch the process. Then we'll be able to propose, discuss, think, vote and comply with the final result.

Don't worry, I'll be active too for a new name ;).


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 22, 2009, 07:17:37 PM
Blank vote.

So that it counts for the quorum,
but so that I can say I agree on the need to scratch a now failed name (PCP) but I don't agree to go back to RPP, as it has also failed (even if fro different reasons).

Of course, if the blank vote isn't considered as a real and complete vote, just let it me know, I'll cast another vote (no rule against that !).

Here here!

I even say that even Regional Rights Party would be better, but again, I think Conservative is the best option.

I know, your proposal is simple and clear. Adn I thank you to be a force for change in the name.

But, for the moment, this is more a procedural vote: to erase the latest name change.
Let's our chairman proceed. He thinks it's better first to erase PCP and then to relaunch the process. Then we'll be able to propose, discuss, think, vote and comply with the final result.

Don't worry, I'll be active too for a new name ;).

My plan is to bring it up again at the convention in February. No rushed last minute behind the scenes choice of the name and armed twisted etc. This way we will already have a decision reached by the time we vote.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 22, 2009, 07:42:21 PM
Blank vote.

So that it counts for the quorum,
but so that I can say I agree on the need to scratch a now failed name (PCP) but I don't agree to go back to RPP, as it has also failed (even if fro different reasons).

Of course, if the blank vote isn't considered as a real and complete vote, just let it me know, I'll cast another vote (no rule against that !).

Here here!

I even say that even Regional Rights Party would be better, but again, I think Conservative is the best option.

I know, your proposal is simple and clear. Adn I thank you to be a force for change in the name.

But, for the moment, this is more a procedural vote: to erase the latest name change.
Let's our chairman proceed. He thinks it's better first to erase PCP and then to relaunch the process. Then we'll be able to propose, discuss, think, vote and comply with the final result.

Don't worry, I'll be active too for a new name ;).

My plan is to bring it up again at the convention in February. No rushed last minute behind the scenes choice of the name and armed twisted etc. This way we will already have a decision reached by the time we vote.

This is very much democratic centralism.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 22, 2009, 07:53:10 PM
Blank vote.

So that it counts for the quorum,
but so that I can say I agree on the need to scratch a now failed name (PCP) but I don't agree to go back to RPP, as it has also failed (even if fro different reasons).

Of course, if the blank vote isn't considered as a real and complete vote, just let it me know, I'll cast another vote (no rule against that !).

Here here!

I even say that even Regional Rights Party would be better, but again, I think Conservative is the best option.

I know, your proposal is simple and clear. Adn I thank you to be a force for change in the name.

But, for the moment, this is more a procedural vote: to erase the latest name change.
Let's our chairman proceed. He thinks it's better first to erase PCP and then to relaunch the process. Then we'll be able to propose, discuss, think, vote and comply with the final result.

Don't worry, I'll be active too for a new name ;).

My plan is to bring it up again at the convention in February. No rushed last minute behind the scenes choice of the name and armed twisted etc. This way we will already have a decision reached by the time we vote.

This is very much democratic centralism.

And what Hamilton did the last time was more democratic? PCP had been taken off the list of possibilities. He revived it behind the scenes and arm twisted, bullied and blackmailed its way to passage. This way we will have a discussion on the private forum and coem to a consensus so its not done in one person's mind.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 22, 2009, 07:56:58 PM
Who is our chair, vice chair, dean, and regional chairs. I need to PM them


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 22, 2009, 08:01:11 PM
Blank vote.

So that it counts for the quorum,
but so that I can say I agree on the need to scratch a now failed name (PCP) but I don't agree to go back to RPP, as it has also failed (even if fro different reasons).

Of course, if the blank vote isn't considered as a real and complete vote, just let it me know, I'll cast another vote (no rule against that !).

Here here!

I even say that even Regional Rights Party would be better, but again, I think Conservative is the best option.

I know, your proposal is simple and clear. Adn I thank you to be a force for change in the name.

But, for the moment, this is more a procedural vote: to erase the latest name change.
Let's our chairman proceed. He thinks it's better first to erase PCP and then to relaunch the process. Then we'll be able to propose, discuss, think, vote and comply with the final result.

Don't worry, I'll be active too for a new name ;).

My plan is to bring it up again at the convention in February. No rushed last minute behind the scenes choice of the name and armed twisted etc. This way we will already have a decision reached by the time we vote.

This is very much democratic centralism.

And what Hamilton did the last time was more democratic? PCP had been taken off the list of possibilities. He revived it behind the scenes and arm twisted, bullied and blackmailed its way to passage. This way we will have a discussion on the private forum and coem to a consensus so its not done in one person's mind.

So, yes, it is democratic centralism.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: California8429 on November 22, 2009, 09:41:34 PM
How about the PCP

Progressive Conservative party.

Easy, simple. We have to go one way or anyother, not 10 different names for the same thing


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 22, 2009, 09:44:36 PM
How about the PCP

Progressive Conservative party.

Easy, simple. We have to go one way or anyother, not 10 different names for the same thing

We already are that name lol and there is wide support to repeal. It was foisted upon us by unethical actions on the part of Hamilton and that stain needs to be lifted. I intend to revisit it down the road. But for now, please vote Aye or Nay on Returning to being the Regional Protection Party.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: California8429 on November 22, 2009, 10:25:24 PM
How about the PCP

Progressive Conservative party.

Easy, simple. We have to go one way or anyother, not 10 different names for the same thing

We already are that name lol and there is wide support to repeal. It was foisted upon us by unethical actions on the part of Hamilton and that stain needs to be lifted. I intend to revisit it down the road. But for now, please vote Aye or Nay on Returning to being the Regional Protection Party.

NAY!

And I'm saying let's not be PCP/RPP. Forget the RPP. ONE NAME PEOPLE


Title: Re: Southern Secessionist Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 22, 2009, 10:27:52 PM
Membership: 2
Trolls-and-or-Frauds: 2

lol

joke party
Always worth a bump when in need of a laugh


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 22, 2009, 10:31:07 PM
Still substantially true, no?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 22, 2009, 10:31:45 PM
Not unless the party was made up of yourself and Hamilton and I missed it


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 23, 2009, 12:22:11 AM
Who is our chair, vice chair, dean, and regional chairs. I need to PM them

Bump. I wanna work!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 23, 2009, 07:47:17 AM
Who is our chair, vice chair, dean, and regional chairs. I need to PM them

Bump. I wanna work!

You will have plenty of work don't you worry. I'll get it to you later today. :)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Psychic Octopus on November 25, 2009, 12:00:16 AM
13 votes if I can count correctly, almost guaranteed passage if we can get out six more voters.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 25, 2009, 12:02:31 AM
13 votes if I can count correctly, almost guaranteed passage if we can get out six more voters.

sorry forgot to do that for you. I was talking to someone on AIM, don't you know. ;)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: #CriminalizeSobriety on November 25, 2009, 02:33:08 PM
i'm here to receive the scoop about joining? NiK recruited me yesterday.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Apollo on November 25, 2009, 03:24:42 PM
aye to the name change

i would, however, second the suggestion to change it to something else (not PCP) at a later time


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 25, 2009, 04:54:26 PM
i'm here to receive the scoop about joining? NiK recruited me yesterday.

Have you read through this yet?

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=95897.0 (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=95897.0)


If so any further questions can be directed towards me or to one of my esteemed associates of whom NiK is one among several.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Psychic Octopus on November 25, 2009, 10:04:34 PM
5 more!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Psychic Octopus on November 26, 2009, 01:57:04 PM
4.) The Regional Protection Party supports term limits on Supreme Court justices

Whatever happened to this idea?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: k-onmmunist on November 26, 2009, 02:00:57 PM
Hi everybody!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 26, 2009, 02:51:37 PM
4.) The Regional Protection Party supports term limits on Supreme Court justices

Whatever happened to this idea?
I have no idea, but we seem to have abandoed all our other originial principles so I guess this one too


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Psychic Octopus on November 26, 2009, 02:53:30 PM

Welcome!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 26, 2009, 02:54:36 PM
New rule that will really help this party:

No one is somebody's recruit, they are a member of the party.  We can't be plagued by this crap anymore where somebody belongs to someone because they recruited them.  You recruit for the good of the party.  

We need to do what is best for the party.  Was NCYank the greatest choice for me at the time to be my running mate?  Of course not, but it set up the party well for the future.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Umengus on November 26, 2009, 03:08:11 PM
aye


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: k-onmmunist on November 26, 2009, 03:36:33 PM
We need to make this more of a big tent party to attract ARC members. Combined with them, this party would dominate Atlasia and end the dominant JCP-party system.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 26, 2009, 04:01:34 PM
We need to make this more of a big tent party to attract ARC members. Combined with them, this party would dominate Atlasia and end the dominant JCP-party system.

lol?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: k-onmmunist on November 26, 2009, 04:02:24 PM
We need to make this more of a big tent party to attract ARC members. Combined with them, this party would dominate Atlasia and end the dominant JCP-party system.

lol?

what


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 26, 2009, 04:04:52 PM
We need to make this more of a big tent party to attract ARC members. Combined with them, this party would dominate Atlasia and end the dominant JCP-party system.

lol?

what

The party leadership lambasted the ARC as a joke party. What makes you think that they would be stupid enough to believe that a combination of the RPP with the ARC and its ≈6 members would lead to RPP "domination"?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: k-onmmunist on November 26, 2009, 04:05:49 PM
Actually, still nearer to 10. Also, it was only Hamilton they really 'lambasted'


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Psychic Octopus on November 26, 2009, 05:27:02 PM
I will need your help with this, Winston. Yankee has charged me with the duty of "ARC Representative", and with you coming as a former member, I will need your help to gather Hamilton's recruits. It won't lead to dominance, but I want to seek some sort of political union between the two, and it will help our electoral base.



Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 26, 2009, 05:44:26 PM
I don't believe any of us lambasted the ARC so much as we made it out to be more of a Hamilton ego trip than anything else. It became more apparently when he had, a week earlier, been a big government guy wanting to nationalize banks all of a sudden carrying the libertarian anti-government flag. Combining the parties would hardly end the JCP dominance though. They will rule as long as they stay together. There simply are not enough right Leandra on this site to compete directly. 


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: FloridaRepublican on November 26, 2009, 06:09:02 PM
AYE


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 27, 2009, 03:53:56 PM
New rule that will really help this party:

No one is somebody's recruit, they are a member of the party.  We can't be plagued by this crap anymore where somebody belongs to someone because they recruited them.  You recruit for the good of the party.  

We need to do what is best for the party.  Was NCYank the greatest choice for me at the time to be my running mate?  Of course not, but it set up the party well for the future.

An interesting concept.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 27, 2009, 04:11:02 PM
We have 16 votes so far.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 27, 2009, 05:14:25 PM
Just in case we don't reach a quorum in time, and because of Thanksgiving falling during the vote, I am prepared to extend the vote if necessary.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 27, 2009, 09:44:40 PM
Just in case we don't reach a quorum in time, and because of Thanksgiving falling during the vote, I am prepared to extend the vote if necessary.

::)

Is there a problem with me making a decision so that what the clear majority of the party wants can stand...(is it just me or does this sound very familiar ;) )?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Psychic Octopus on November 27, 2009, 11:46:54 PM
Yes, I agree with North Carolina Yankee. I have PM'd people about the vote, and I feel that Thanksgiving has affected turnout. I recommend the vote be extended from 7 to 10 days, and new members allowed to vote.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 27, 2009, 11:54:14 PM
Yes, I agree with North Carolina Yankee. I have PM'd people about the vote, and I feel that Thanksgiving has affected turnout. I recommend the vote be extended from 7 to 10 days, and new members allowed to vote.

The addition of new members has in fact raised the quorum needed for passage so I agree thus I will new members to vote in this. To not would in fact be very stupid. I must say I was not expected this level of new members this soon.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on November 28, 2009, 12:04:52 AM
Or we just say screw the quorum and change the name anyway.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 28, 2009, 12:07:13 AM
Or we just say screw the quorum and change the name anyway.

Yes, I can still excerisize the "nuclear option" of sorts which is to declare the previous vote invalid. But I would prefer not too if at all possible.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: 5280 on November 28, 2009, 09:25:10 PM
Nay, keep the new name.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: #CriminalizeSobriety on November 28, 2009, 09:34:27 PM
i fully support a name change, for what it's worth. ya got my vote!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Psychic Octopus on November 28, 2009, 09:43:45 PM
Thank you all for the votes. I hope we can reach the quorum.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 28, 2009, 09:46:20 PM
Should the party name be restored to the Regional Protection Party? This vote will last a week. All members registered at the commencement of this election are eligible to vote.

Please Vote AYE or NAY.

This vote fails.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on November 28, 2009, 10:11:21 PM
Should the party name be restored to the Regional Protection Party? This vote will last a week. All members registered at the commencement of this election are eligible to vote.

Please Vote AYE or NAY.

This vote fails.

     Evidently you missed the post where he extended the deadline due to Thanksgiving weekend. :P


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 28, 2009, 10:11:57 PM
Quote from: PiT (The Physicist) link=topic=80405.msg2245242#msg2245242 ate=1259464281
Should the party name be restored to the Regional Protection Party? This vote will last a week. All members registered at the commencement of this election are eligible to vote.

Please Vote AYE or NAY.

This vote fails.

     Evidently you missed the post where he extended the deadline due to Thanksgiving weekend. :P

I saw it. I simply contest his right to do so.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: k-onmmunist on November 29, 2009, 09:51:12 AM
I vote against. Long live the PCP!


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 29, 2009, 12:55:44 PM
I saw it. I simply contest his right to do so.
And we have long contested your right to post in our thread, looks like no one wins today


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: k-onmmunist on November 29, 2009, 01:14:17 PM
I saw it. I simply contest his right to do so.
And we have long contested your right to post in our thread, looks like no one wins today

LOL.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 29, 2009, 03:04:03 PM
I saw it. I simply contest his right to do so.
And we have long contested your right to post in our thread, looks like no one wins today

I believe it is the SoFA who determines the question. You have on many occasions antagonized him. I have not.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 29, 2009, 05:05:15 PM
We are the anti-you, we care 0 about official things.  We are the RPP whether the SoFA thinks so or not


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 29, 2009, 07:24:04 PM
Then why not just declare that you have taken power? Why participate in official things such as elections?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 29, 2009, 08:43:37 PM
This man does not speak for me.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: CatoMinor on November 29, 2009, 08:45:56 PM


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 29, 2009, 08:53:24 PM

Well, you haven't done anything about him.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 29, 2009, 09:13:26 PM

I never intended for you to be the judge of what my party members need to do. I know what he needs to do, I know how to make them do it, and so far I am enjoying complete success in that regards.

Quote from: PiT (The Physicist) link=topic=80405.msg2245242#msg2245242 ate=1259464281
Should the party name be restored to the Regional Protection Party? This vote will last a week. All members registered at the commencement of this election are eligible to vote.

Please Vote AYE or NAY.

This vote fails.

     Evidently you missed the post where he extended the deadline due to Thanksgiving weekend. :P

I saw it. I simply contest his right to do so.

You contest it on what grounds. Give me the statute that says a party chairmen must hold an election for a certain period and no longer.


Even so I will likely fail this vote by tomorrow if a quorum isn't reached. This is a pitiful, performance.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on November 29, 2009, 09:15:31 PM


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 29, 2009, 09:23:26 PM

I never intended for you to be the judge of what my party members need to do. I know what he needs to do, I know how to make them do it, and so far I am enjoying complete success in that regards.

Don't expect the rest of us to take your promises seriously, then.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Psychic Octopus on November 29, 2009, 09:26:38 PM


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 29, 2009, 09:29:22 PM

I never intended for you to be the judge of what my party members need to do. I know what he needs to do, I know how to make them do it, and so far I am enjoying complete success in that regards.

Don't expect the rest of us to take your promises seriously, then.

You calling me a liar, you criminal?

 I have done everything I promised to do. I never promised to turn him into Barack Obama for you. I promised to make a German shepard out of a pitbull.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 29, 2009, 09:33:09 PM

I never intended for you to be the judge of what my party members need to do. I know what he needs to do, I know how to make them do it, and so far I am enjoying complete success in that regards.

Don't expect the rest of us to take your promises seriously, then.

You calling me a liar, you criminal?

 I have done everything I promised to do. I never promised to turn him into Barack Obama for you. I promised to make a German shepard out of a pitbull.

I never called you a liar. I'm simply saying that what we get out of you may not be what we expected, and that we may expect different things as a result.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on November 29, 2009, 09:38:56 PM

I never intended for you to be the judge of what my party members need to do. I know what he needs to do, I know how to make them do it, and so far I am enjoying complete success in that regards.

Don't expect the rest of us to take your promises seriously, then.

You calling me a liar, you criminal?

 I have done everything I promised to do. I never promised to turn him into Barack Obama for you. I promised to make a German shepard out of a pitbull.

I never called you a liar. I'm simply saying that what we get out of you may not be what we expected, and that we may expect different things as a result.

I promised I would control DWTL within a certain set of limits. I even posted the terms that I gave him in this thread. Only an illiterate idiot could fail to grasp what I did and did not plan to do with him.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Rowan on November 29, 2009, 10:01:49 PM
This man speaks for me.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Teddy (IDS Legislator) on November 29, 2009, 11:58:08 PM

We are a big tent party.

Just because DWTL willingly lets his buttons be pressed does not mean we are going to pick him up by the back of the shirt and throw him out of the party.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: big bad fab on November 30, 2009, 04:36:41 AM


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: k-onmmunist on November 30, 2009, 05:31:22 AM


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on November 30, 2009, 11:24:48 AM
Thank you, someone finally got my point


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Daniel Adams on November 30, 2009, 03:57:10 PM
There was nothing outrageous in what DWTL said.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on November 30, 2009, 04:01:37 PM

That sort of thinking is why I am Governor and you are not.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on November 30, 2009, 04:11:33 PM
DWTL speaks for all of you.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: H. Ross Peron on November 30, 2009, 11:06:16 PM
Keep Progressive Conservative Party.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: nhmagic on December 02, 2009, 12:41:08 PM
Aye


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 02, 2009, 03:43:49 PM
I motion that we officially endorse Vepres as our 3rd preference, he has showed himself to have outgrown his newbie mistakes and is a solid conservative and regional rights advocate.   While Mint fits this bill too, his association with Hamilton is sickening


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Brandon H on December 03, 2009, 12:17:28 AM
I motion that we officially endorse Vepres as our 3rd preference, he has showed himself to have outgrown his newbie mistakes and is a solid conservative and regional rights advocate.   While Mint fits this bill too, his association with Hamilton is sickening

Agreed, though I don't think third preferences will end up meaning anything.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on December 03, 2009, 12:18:21 AM
I motion that we officially endorse Vepres as our 3rd preference, he has showed himself to have outgrown his newbie mistakes and is a solid conservative and regional rights advocate.   While Mint fits this bill too, his association with Hamilton is sickening

Agreed, though I don't think third preferences will end up meaning anything.

Why not? The RPP won't get two candidates in.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Scam of God on December 03, 2009, 11:49:10 AM
What, exactly, is "progressive" about any of you morons?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Psychic Octopus on December 03, 2009, 12:02:21 PM
Progressive is a dumb name, and in general, so is the term "progressive".


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Scam of God on December 03, 2009, 12:03:40 PM
Progressive is a dumb name, and in general, so is the term "progressive".

So is your "Regional Protection Party". The "Regional Protection" part of the name flies out the window when one of these regions does anything "progressive".


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on December 03, 2009, 12:05:29 PM
Progressive is a dumb name, and in general, so is the term "progressive".

So is your "Regional Protection Party". The "Regional Protection" part of the name flies out the window when one of these regions does anything "progressive".

Indeed. Notice the amendment in the Senate now; the RPP is blocking regional rights.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Franzl on December 03, 2009, 01:01:20 PM
APA: Authoritarian Party of Atlasia


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Brandon H on December 03, 2009, 01:35:16 PM
I motion that we officially endorse Vepres as our 3rd preference, he has showed himself to have outgrown his newbie mistakes and is a solid conservative and regional rights advocate.   While Mint fits this bill too, his association with Hamilton is sickening

Agreed, though I don't think third preferences will end up meaning anything.

Why not? The RPP won't get two candidates in.

You're right. So second preferences won't end up meaning much either.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Brandon H on December 03, 2009, 01:39:09 PM
The Samuel L. Jackson Party or anything else that makes good use of paraphrased quote:

"I've had it with these mothering trolls on this mothering forum."


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Franzl on December 03, 2009, 01:41:03 PM
You're right. So second preferences won't end up meaning much either.

You seem to not understand how the STV voting system works.

If your 2nd preferenced RPP candidate is not elected, then all his votes would go to your 3rd preferenced candidate.



Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on December 03, 2009, 01:44:26 PM
You're right. So second preferences won't end up meaning much either.

You seem to not understand how the STV voting system works.

If your 2nd preferenced RPP candidate is not elected, then all his votes would go to your 3rd preferenced candidate.

     Assuming the 3rd preferenced candidate is still in the race. Otherwise it goes to the 4th preferenced candidate. That is fairly important in this situation, since Vepres might not have a large enough base to edge out the second RPPer in 1st preferences.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Franzl on December 03, 2009, 01:46:47 PM
You're right. So second preferences won't end up meaning much either.

You seem to not understand how the STV voting system works.

If your 2nd preferenced RPP candidate is not elected, then all his votes would go to your 3rd preferenced candidate.

     Assuming the 3rd preferenced candidate is still in the race. Otherwise it goes to the 4th preferenced candidate. That is fairly important in this situation, since Vepres might not have a large enough base to edge out the second RPPer in 1st preferences.

Yes, but my point is that it is incorrect to believe that lower preferences will be irrlevant simply because the 2nd preferenced candidate is not elected, which Brandon seemed to be indicating (if it wasn't meant that way, I apologize)


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Brandon H on December 03, 2009, 04:31:32 PM
I know how it works. I don't believe there will be any other candidate that I preference not eliminated by the time one of the achieves the quota to get elected.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 03, 2009, 04:33:00 PM
I motion that is our endorsed ballot unless someone objects within the next 24 hours at which point I ask that the chair would call a vote:

[1] DWTL
[2] AHDuke
[3] Vepres


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Badger on December 07, 2009, 01:17:18 PM
Greetings RPP:

I posted this earlier to the ARC Convention thread believing Libertas was one of theirs. I then learned that he is apparently an RPP member and running under your banner for NE Assembly. (Correct?)

The reason I'm posting is I want to make the RPP aware of some VERY serious issues of blatant anti-Semitism by NE Assembly candidate Libertas. I wanted to make the party fully aware of his "character" (or lack thereof).

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=106237.0
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=106237.msg2257179#msg2257179
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=103928.msg2198995#msg2198995

Please note both Lieberman's tie and Obama's lapel pin in the image attached to his post. We're REALLY not talking either subtle or "misinterpreted" here.

I'm no fan of thought policing or political correctness, but the evidence here is rather incontrovertible. I don't want to see this type of beyond the pale bigotry infect either Atlasia or any party, so I'm doing my part to make sure voters and parties are aware of it. I urge your party to disown any support of this candidate and his views. I know you guys can find multiple other respectable conservative candidates to support for NE Assembly rather than stooping to back someone like this.

Thank you all for your time and consideration, and good luck in the upcoming elections.
 


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on December 07, 2009, 01:27:30 PM
     For that matter, the pattern on Obama's tie in that picture forms lots of Stars of David if you look closely.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: RIP Robert H Bork on December 07, 2009, 01:38:53 PM
     For that matter, the pattern on Obama's tie in that picture forms lots of Stars of David if you look closely.

^^^^


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Badger on December 07, 2009, 01:53:31 PM
     For that matter, the pattern on Obama's tie in that picture forms lots of Stars of David if you look closely.

^^^^

Yeah, I just noticed that too a couple minutes ago.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Badger on December 07, 2009, 05:49:09 PM
<Reposted from ARC Convention Thread as relevant to my previous post here.>

WMP. :P

I think we need to address this stuff with Libertas head on now, Sewer might be an idiot but this is an obvious PR disaster if we don't handle it right away.
Yes, I should release a statement.

As I said, I now fully recognize the G-D-given right of Israel to exterminate the Palestinians, the Iranians, and and any other sub-human groups to make Lebensraum for the Chosen People, as they have done since the genocidal times of their sacred Hebrew Scriptures. I pledge to be a faithful shabbos goy to serve Israel forever and ever.

I will be at the Wailing Wall to deposit my check to the ADL within the hour. After meeting with Mel Gibson, along with the ghosts of Marlon Brando and Michael Jackson, it was determined that this is the best way to show proof of my heartfelt conversion.

Two points:

First, both your post and the underlying thread where you posted that bigoted image had nothing whatsoever to do with Israel or the Middle East. I invite anyone to check. Nice try, but trying to pass off your not-so-latent anti-semitism bubbling up in public as a mere critique of Israeli influence over US foreign policy is grossly disingenuous.

Secondly, I went and looked up the website listed on that image you posted, Deesillustration.com

http://www.rense.com/1.mpicons/dees1.htm

Check out this crap if you wish, people, but suffice to say it the "artist" posts hundreds of photoshopped images chock full of holocaust denial, blatant anti-semitism (e.g. check out the 5th one down resurrecting the old "The Jews control Hollywood" canard), trutherism (see e.g. 2nd image down), and good old fashion conspiracy theories (tons of Illuminati references with the Fed, and about 12 down--I kid you not--an attack on the moon landing as staged). There's even a few lionizing imprisoned a German neo-nazi holocaust denier, Ernest Zundel.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Zundel

Libertas may not have created this "artwork", but knowing these are the types of websites he trolls and finds likeminded compatriots tells us plenty.

Again, I call on all parties to unreservedly disown Libertas's candidacy for the good of Atlasia.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: k-onmmunist on December 07, 2009, 05:51:30 PM
Can I have preferences in the Northeast?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on December 07, 2009, 05:52:26 PM

Might as well ask the RPP for preferences in the Pacific.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: k-onmmunist on December 07, 2009, 05:57:35 PM

Might as well ask the RPP for preferences in the Pacific.

:(


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on December 07, 2009, 05:59:00 PM

RPP affiliation will only get you somewhere if you are in the Mideast, at least when they had Tmth. I guess if you kiss enough ass it might help. But the RPP is generally a useless organization.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 09, 2009, 04:28:39 PM
Jbrase will be running for Lt. Gov., lets all give him our support


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: CatoMinor on December 09, 2009, 05:30:26 PM
Jbrase will be running for Lt. Gov., lets all give him our support
I know I'll support him.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on December 09, 2009, 07:44:17 PM
Sorry for the absence but I place more priority on my Graduation project then this stupid site.


I authorize PiT to conduct or start any votes on Endorsements, etc.


I shall be back around the middle of next week.




Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on December 09, 2009, 07:46:20 PM
Just fold already lol


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 09, 2009, 10:48:27 PM
You've convinced some of our weaker members that we can't win, but the ones with a brain are sitll standing


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on December 09, 2009, 10:51:22 PM
Would you say that this party is characterized by freedom of discussion and unity of action?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on December 09, 2009, 10:51:28 PM
You've convinced some of our weaker members that we can't win, but the ones with a brain are sitll standing

Actually, I didn't want them to leave your party. Catch my drift?

There is proof of that.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Scam of God on December 09, 2009, 10:52:09 PM
You've convinced some of our weaker members that we can't win, but the ones with a brain are sitll standing

You really ought to split into a libertarian and a populist Party - at the very least, the populists ought to join the JCP and try to infiltrate it and turn it from social democracy.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on December 09, 2009, 10:52:56 PM
You've convinced some of our weaker members that we can't win, but the ones with a brain are sitll standing

You really ought to split into a libertarian and a populist Party - at the very least, the populists ought to join the JCP and try to infiltrate it and turn it from social democracy.

DWTL's skewed vision of libertarianism includes himself.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Scam of God on December 09, 2009, 10:54:21 PM
You've convinced some of our weaker members that we can't win, but the ones with a brain are sitll standing

You really ought to split into a libertarian and a populist Party - at the very least, the populists ought to join the JCP and try to infiltrate it and turn it from social democracy.

DWTL's skewed vision of libertarianism includes himself.

If we had two broad-based, big-tent Parties in Atlasia - one libertarian, one populist - I could stomach being in the libertarian Party with him, and with you, however much I may dislike his stands on abortion and immigration. But as it stands, he's trying to preserve a rapidly collapsing tent, to his own detriment.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on December 09, 2009, 10:55:53 PM
You've convinced some of our weaker members that we can't win, but the ones with a brain are sitll standing

You really ought to split into a libertarian and a populist Party - at the very least, the populists ought to join the JCP and try to infiltrate it and turn it from social democracy.

DWTL's skewed vision of libertarianism includes himself.

If we had two broad-based, big-tent Parties in Atlasia - one libertarian, one populist - I could stomach being in the libertarian Party with him, and with you, however much I may dislike his stands on abortion and immigration. But as it stands, he's trying to preserve a rapidly collapsing tent, to his own detriment.

Perhaps, but we must recognize that DWTL is a power hungry manipulator who wants nothing but his own election. He does not care about his party mates and seeks not to help them but to use them. I do not want the ARC associated with such malice.

His antics have destroyed the RPP, and he continues to force out the most respected members.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on December 09, 2009, 10:56:48 PM
Atlasia's political system doesn't actively encourage a two-party system.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Badger on December 10, 2009, 12:15:58 AM
Greetings RPP:

I posted this earlier to the ARC Convention thread believing Libertas was one of theirs. I then learned that he is apparently an RPP member and running under your banner for NE Assembly. (Correct?)

The reason I'm posting is I want to make the RPP aware of some VERY serious issues of blatant anti-Semitism by NE Assembly candidate Libertas. I wanted to make the party fully aware of his "character" (or lack thereof).

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=106237.0
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=106237.msg2257179#msg2257179
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=103928.msg2198995#msg2198995

Please note both Lieberman's tie and Obama's lapel pin in the image attached to his post. We're REALLY not talking either subtle or "misinterpreted" here.

I'm no fan of thought policing or political correctness, but the evidence here is rather incontrovertible. I don't want to see this type of beyond the pale bigotry infect either Atlasia or any party, so I'm doing my part to make sure voters and parties are aware of it. I urge your party to disown any support of this candidate and his views. I know you guys can find multiple other respectable conservative candidates to support for NE Assembly rather than stooping to back someone like this.

Thank you all for your time and consideration, and good luck in the upcoming elections.
 

Bumped.

Strangely quiet....


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: big bad fab on December 10, 2009, 03:24:38 AM
You've convinced some of our weaker members that we can't win, but the ones with a brain are sitll standing

I'm so bored with this game that even this doesn't anger me any longer.

DWTL, you have the ability to kill your own party in every sentence which is THEORETICALLY aimed at outside Atlasians !! Amazing...


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Scam of God on December 10, 2009, 03:25:58 AM
I'm very serious regarding this suggestion:

You've convinced some of our weaker members that we can't win, but the ones with a brain are sitll standing

You really ought to split into a libertarian and a populist Party - at the very least, the populists ought to join the JCP and try to infiltrate it and turn it from social democracy.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 10, 2009, 09:12:44 AM
Einzinge, the RPP is going nowhere, we need to be the force against leftist domination.  Granted, Hamilton's brainwashed enough people where that gets harder, but we still can field a few senators and possibly make a run at the presidency if we can get AndrewCT to run on the top with an RPPer on the bottom


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Scam of God on December 10, 2009, 09:15:22 AM
Einzinge, the RPP is going nowhere, we need to be the force against leftist domination.

Except your entire electoral coalition is oblivious, obsequious, and obsolete. Your entire strategy, clearly patterned off the old-tried-and-true Republican Fusionism, is now less than worthless.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: big bad fab on December 10, 2009, 09:16:33 AM
I'm very serious regarding this suggestion:

You've convinced some of our weaker members that we can't win, but the ones with a brain are sitll standing

You really ought to split into a libertarian and a populist Party - at the very least, the populists ought to join the JCP and try to infiltrate it and turn it from social democracy.

The RPP isn't only libertarians and populists...
It's not just as you see the world...


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Scam of God on December 10, 2009, 09:18:33 AM
I'm very serious regarding this suggestion:

You've convinced some of our weaker members that we can't win, but the ones with a brain are sitll standing

You really ought to split into a libertarian and a populist Party - at the very least, the populists ought to join the JCP and try to infiltrate it and turn it from social democracy.

The RPP isn't only libertarians and populists...
It's not just as you see the world...

Pretty closely, though. Judging by your economic score, you'd be more than happy to sign up with a populist Party that might actually do something about your pet social issues. A score of one either way is expendable.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 10, 2009, 11:56:48 AM
Einzinge, the RPP is going nowhere, we need to be the force against leftist domination.

Except your entire electoral coalition is oblivious, obsequious, and obsolete. Your entire strategy, clearly patterned off the old-tried-and-true Republican Fusionism, is now less than worthless.
I suggest you find out what is actually going on rather than reading Hamilton talking points.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Psychic Octopus on December 10, 2009, 12:07:07 PM
Einzinge, the RPP is going nowhere, we need to be the force against leftist domination.

Except your entire electoral coalition is oblivious, obsequious, and obsolete. Your entire strategy, clearly patterned off the old-tried-and-true Republican Fusionism, is now less than worthless.
I suggest you find out what is actually going on rather than reading Hamilton talking points.
LOL, I know every voter you have. Most won't even show up. Many are old one-timers from August and September, who are somewhat active but don't pay attention to the game. The likelihood you have of future victories is shrinking fast, helped and perpetrated by your loud, boisterous failures.


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Sewer on December 10, 2009, 03:52:31 PM
()

Get it?


Title: Re: Regional Protection Party
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on December 10, 2009, 04:13:23 PM
lol, win