Talk Elections

Election Archive => 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls => Topic started by: Bandit3 the Worker on September 17, 2008, 10:25:33 PM



Title: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Bandit3 the Worker on September 17, 2008, 10:25:33 PM
I had to do a double-take when I saw this one, but here it comes:

http://www.wthr.com/global/story.asp?s=9029011


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Ronnie on September 17, 2008, 10:27:58 PM
By all means, let this poll influence Obama to dump his precious resources into IN.


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Sam Spade on September 17, 2008, 10:29:45 PM
Selzer again...


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Eraserhead on September 17, 2008, 10:32:32 PM
These state polls are certainly coming out at a furious pace these days.


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: TheresNoMoney on September 17, 2008, 10:35:26 PM
The poll was done by Selzer & Co., who 538.com ranked as the most accurate pollster during the primary season:

538.com Pollster Rankings (http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/search/label/pollster%20ratings)

Here is the Indianapolis Star writeup on the poll:

Link (http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080917/NEWS0502/80917076/-1/ARCHIVE)


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Lief 🗽 on September 17, 2008, 10:36:31 PM
Neat. I was worried that McCain would get a North Dakota or Montana-esque bounce in Indiana, but so far it seems like he has not.


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: HardRCafé on September 17, 2008, 10:42:04 PM
No doubt propelled by the awesome reverse coattails of Jill Long-Thompson.


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Alcon on September 17, 2008, 10:43:30 PM
The poll was done by Selzer & Co., who 538.com ranked as the most accurate pollster during the primary season:

538.com Pollster Rankings (http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/search/label/pollster%20ratings)

Here is the Indianapolis Star writeup on the poll:

Link (http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080917/NEWS0502/80917076/-1/ARCHIVE)

Being that it's an Indiana poll...isn't that n=1?


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Sam Spade on September 17, 2008, 10:45:12 PM
The poll was done by Selzer & Co., who 538.com ranked as the most accurate pollster during the primary season:

538.com Pollster Rankings (http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/search/label/pollster%20ratings)

Here is the Indianapolis Star writeup on the poll:

Link (http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080917/NEWS0502/80917076/-1/ARCHIVE)

It's easier to be the most accurate (and least accurate) when you only poll one primary (not a primary actually, but a caucus).


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Alcon on September 17, 2008, 10:46:09 PM
The poll was done by Selzer & Co., who 538.com ranked as the most accurate pollster during the primary season:

538.com Pollster Rankings (http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/search/label/pollster%20ratings)

Here is the Indianapolis Star writeup on the poll:

Link (http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080917/NEWS0502/80917076/-1/ARCHIVE)

It's easier to be the most accurate (and least accurate) when you only poll one primary (not a primary actually, but a caucus).

Indiana was a primary...?


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Sam Spade on September 17, 2008, 10:50:02 PM
The poll was done by Selzer & Co., who 538.com ranked as the most accurate pollster during the primary season:

538.com Pollster Rankings (http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/search/label/pollster%20ratings)

Here is the Indianapolis Star writeup on the poll:

Link (http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080917/NEWS0502/80917076/-1/ARCHIVE)

It's easier to be the most accurate (and least accurate) when you only poll one primary (not a primary actually, but a caucus).

Indiana was a primary...?

Now that I'm looking it up, they did poll Indiana couple of weeks before the primary.  Had it as Obama +3 - barely within the MOE.

But what else did they poll, because a one-point miss in Iowa and a four-point miss in Indiana does not give me a 0.75 accuracy average.


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Alcon on September 17, 2008, 11:29:12 PM
The poll was done by Selzer & Co., who 538.com ranked as the most accurate pollster during the primary season:

538.com Pollster Rankings (http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/search/label/pollster%20ratings)

Here is the Indianapolis Star writeup on the poll:

Link (http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080917/NEWS0502/80917076/-1/ARCHIVE)

It's easier to be the most accurate (and least accurate) when you only poll one primary (not a primary actually, but a caucus).

I know she does work for the Detroit Free Press in Michigan.  I've always heard very good things about Ann Selzer, but I do not believe this poll.


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Tender Branson on September 17, 2008, 11:37:14 PM
Too much information. ERROR. ERROR !

I´ve created the German Wikipedia page on 2008 State polling and I used to update it every day, but now each day about 20-30 polls are released ...

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umfragen_zur_Pr%C3%A4sidentschaftswahl_in_den_Vereinigten_Staaten_2008_nach_Bundesstaaten

As for the poll: Indiana will be considerably closer than 2004, but I don´t think Obama can win. I would be happy though if CNN is not able to call IN after the polls are closed on Nov. 4 ...


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Mr. Morden on September 17, 2008, 11:39:33 PM
The poll was done by Selzer & Co., who 538.com ranked as the most accurate pollster during the primary season:

538.com Pollster Rankings (http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/search/label/pollster%20ratings)

Here is the Indianapolis Star writeup on the poll:

Link (http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080917/NEWS0502/80917076/-1/ARCHIVE)

It's easier to be the most accurate (and least accurate) when you only poll one primary (not a primary actually, but a caucus).

Indiana was a primary...?

Now that I'm looking it up, they did poll Indiana couple of weeks before the primary.  Had it as Obama +3 - barely within the MOE.

But what else did they poll, because a one-point miss in Iowa and a four-point miss in Indiana does not give me a 0.75 accuracy average.

They had an OK Michigan poll:

https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/PRESIDENT/2008R/polls.php?action=indpoll&id=2620080111040

which showed Romney up by 5 (actual result: Romney wins by 9).  Better than the polls that actually had McCain winning, I guess.



Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: auburntiger on September 17, 2008, 11:51:11 PM
This is getting annoying!! Obama will never win Indiana! Trash poll.


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: ?????????? on September 18, 2008, 01:28:22 AM

Isn't that a steakhouse? Sam Selzers?


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Aizen on September 18, 2008, 01:32:03 AM
ahahahahahahah

mccain is losing in indiana

indiana!

hahaha

how the mighty have fallen

stick a fork in mccain


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: ?????????? on September 18, 2008, 01:33:08 AM
ahahahahahahah

mccain is losing in indiana

indiana!

hahaha

how the mighty have fallen

stick a fork in mccain

Please, for the love of Christ, go away.


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Aizen on September 18, 2008, 01:35:59 AM
ahahahahahahah

mccain is losing in indiana

indiana!

hahaha

how the mighty have fallen

stick a fork in mccain

Please, for the love of Christ, go away.


whoa

you go away you stupid son of a bitch

nah i'm just messin', you're not really stupid


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Sam Spade on September 18, 2008, 08:59:06 AM
The poll was done by Selzer & Co., who 538.com ranked as the most accurate pollster during the primary season:

538.com Pollster Rankings (http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/search/label/pollster%20ratings)

Here is the Indianapolis Star writeup on the poll:

Link (http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080917/NEWS0502/80917076/-1/ARCHIVE)

It's easier to be the most accurate (and least accurate) when you only poll one primary (not a primary actually, but a caucus).

I know she does work for the Detroit Free Press in Michigan.  I've always heard very good things about Ann Selzer, but I do not believe this poll.

She does the polling for the Detroit Free Press?


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: JohnCA246 on September 18, 2008, 11:16:58 AM
The Hoosier state loves corn, Peyton Manning, and Barack Obama?


Somehow I doubt this poll, but hey Ill take it.


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: agcatter on September 18, 2008, 11:57:17 AM
Must explain why McCain is spending all that time in Indiana.  Oh wait, he hasn't been there.


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: ChrisFromNJ on September 18, 2008, 11:57:54 AM
Must explain why McCain is spending all that time in Indiana.  Oh wait, he hasn't been there.

I agree!

Signed,

- Al Gore and Tennessee in 2000


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: RJ on September 18, 2008, 02:37:28 PM
Wow, does this mean Obama needs the Kerry states+IA+NM+IN? Make that Kerry states+IA+IN???

Not even I would buy that one! Good to see, though.


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Ebowed on December 22, 2008, 06:03:12 AM
ahahahahahahah

mccain is losing in indiana

indiana!

hahaha

how the mighty have fallen

stick a fork in mccain

way to buy into trash polls, troll


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Meeker on December 22, 2008, 06:08:45 AM
This thread is great.


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: justfollowingtheelections on December 22, 2008, 12:58:05 PM
I've had a lot of fun reading these threads about how Obama couldn't possibly win in states such as Indiana or North Carolina.  To be honest I didn't think it would happen either because of the Bradley effect, but I think we should all show a little more respect to statisticians.  They know a lot more about their science than most of us do.


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: emailking on December 22, 2008, 01:04:43 PM
I remember this thread.

Most of the prognosticators here are just armchair pollsters really. Each poll released is a piece of evidence worthy of consideration.


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Edu on December 22, 2008, 02:47:29 PM
LOL


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Holmes on December 22, 2008, 03:22:54 PM
Obama can never win states like Georgia and Tennessee, especially not in 2012!!

:)

Apparently saying something is impossible here makes it happen...


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on December 22, 2008, 03:24:58 PM
By all means, let this poll influence Obama to dump his precious resources into IN.

....:P


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Lief 🗽 on December 23, 2008, 11:46:06 PM
LOLOL, Republican hacks (includes Sam Spade).


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Lunar on December 24, 2008, 12:05:43 AM
That's why I only make fun of Insider Advantage and SUSA polls (and Zogby, obv).


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Ronnie on December 24, 2008, 12:09:03 AM

...bah


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Lunar on December 24, 2008, 12:14:53 AM
since when were Obama's resources precious anyway?  He was advertising in Atlanta, West Virginia, and North Dakota.


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Bacon King on December 24, 2008, 01:21:55 AM
since when were Obama's resources precious anyway?  He was advertising in Atlanta, West Virginia, and North Dakota.

Well McCain did win the money war you know. [/JJ]


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: Lunar on December 24, 2008, 01:23:21 AM
Yeah but Ronnie is not crazy insane OCD like JJ


Title: Re: Obama leading by 3% in INDIANA!!!
Post by: LanceMcSteel on December 24, 2008, 01:38:29 AM
Republicans=Fail